| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
553
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:I have no faith in the election voting process at all.
A candidate basically has his hundreds of alliance mate votes, and their alts on top. Pretty much seals the candidates seat and we can say is pretty much rigged voting..
People in small corps/alliances even though they may have lots of eve experience, would never get voted because of this.. So thats why i guess a lot of ppl dont stand and ppl dont vote either...
I still think that CCP should be the people to effectively 'interview' candidates from all areas (null, low, empire, pvp, trade) and they choose who they think is the best person to be on the CSM. Thats pretty much the only way to ensure fairness.
True, but the null dudes give **** about that they think they are beter and stuff.... |

Ira Theos
Viziam Amarr Empire
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:There are approximately 7000 members of GSF. Let's be generous and assume that every single one of these members belongs to a seperate account which can vote
There are approximately 350,000 active accounts which can vote.
"Goons" make up a massive TWO PERCENT of the voting population.
It doesn't matter how much hysterical hurfblurf people spout out about the sneaky evil goons rigging this or controlling that (where do they get the time? ) the plain, incontestable, inconvenient, annoying fact is that they got their guy elected because they got their asses in gear, got motivated, got organised, got their members to actually vote, and as a result they got their result.
All the fancy STV schemes and reserved seats and consituencies and yadda yadda won't count for **** unless the people who are bawwing their little eyes out about MEAN OLE MITTENS cut out the slacktivism and god damb well VOTE.
If the Goons each had an average of just two accounts, then they would make up 4% by your own numbers. I suspect they have more than two accounts each on average. That still doesn't get to the heart of the issue of their voting power because it is more a question of how many votes can be focused on each potential CSM seat. I suspect if the Mittani coordinated his available votes more carefully, he might be able to fill all the CSM seats with Goons. Anyway your numbers are off because not all of the 350,000 number you throw around are actually active in the vote and that is what counts, so the Goons unified block vote has a disproportionate effect. This is enough to give them an "I-Win" button in the CSM every time. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:39:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:The Mittani hasn't "done" anything in Eve but coordinate Ass-Hattery. And you're surprised we love and vote for him?
|

2bhammered
Perkone Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:42:00 -
[34] - Quote
If you find a good candidate I promise to support his or hers campaign with funds and lasers. My only requirement is the candidate can not be a member of an 0.0 alliance, oh and he or she have to support my idea of a ranked based arena/bg system to be put in place into the game so one can have eve alliance tournament stylefighting everyday of the year with your own team!!!
again, if you are it or know who I will pledge funds and lasers to his or hers cause!! |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1763
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:47:00 -
[35] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:tippia gtfo out my thread, your opinion will never matter... now get out
tippia, a long-time eve-o poster vs "WhyTry1" some nobody posting with an NPC corp alt
I wonder whose opinion is more relevant hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm andski for csm7~ |

met worst
The Drongo Club
115
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 20:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
Not this subject again  |

Zirse
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
229
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 21:43:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:Malcanis wrote:There are approximately 7000 members of GSF. Let's be generous and assume that every single one of these members belongs to a seperate account which can vote
There are approximately 350,000 active accounts which can vote.
"Goons" make up a massive TWO PERCENT of the voting population.
It doesn't matter how much hysterical hurfblurf people spout out about the sneaky evil goons rigging this or controlling that (where do they get the time? ) the plain, incontestable, inconvenient, annoying fact is that they got their guy elected because they got their asses in gear, got motivated, got organised, got their members to actually vote, and as a result they got their result.
All the fancy STV schemes and reserved seats and consituencies and yadda yadda won't count for **** unless the people who are bawwing their little eyes out about MEAN OLE MITTENS cut out the slacktivism and god damb well VOTE. If the Goons each had an average of just two accounts, then they would make up 4% by your own numbers. I suspect they have more than two accounts each on average. That still doesn't get to the heart of the issue of their voting power because it is more a question of how many votes can be focused on each potential CSM seat. I suspect if the Mittani coordinated his available votes more carefully, he might be able to fill all the CSM seats with Goons. Anyway your numbers are off because not all of the 350,000 number you throw around are actually active in the vote and that is what counts, so the Goons unified block vote has a disproportionate effect. This is enough to give them an "I-Win" button in the CSM every time. And by the way Malcanis? Why do you look so constipated??
You are aware that anyone can have two accounts or more correct?
I'm fine with people who have multiple accounts voting more than once because a)there's no way to regulate it even if you wanted to and b) people who bring in more revenue for CCP should get a larger say in the CSM.
|

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8185
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 21:46:00 -
[38] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:I have no faith in the election voting process at all.
A candidate basically has his hundreds of alliance mate votes, and their alts on top. Pretty much seals the candidates seat and we can say is pretty much rigged voting. Except that's not what the phrase "rigged voting" means, at all. That's just an organized voting bloc.
Here's the relevant Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8185
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 21:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tippia wrote:WhyTry1 wrote:People in small corps/alliances even though they may have lots of eve experience, would never get voted because of this.. No, the reason they rarely get voted in is because they can't capture an audience or a following and try to rely on their small corps/alliances to get them in rather than to run a proper campaign. History has show as much. As usual Tippia's logic is spot-on. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 21:54:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:WhyTry1 wrote:I have no faith in the election voting process at all.
A candidate basically has his hundreds of alliance mate votes, and their alts on top. Pretty much seals the candidates seat and we can say is pretty much rigged voting..
People in small corps/alliances even though they may have lots of eve experience, would never get voted because of this.. So thats why i guess a lot of ppl dont stand and ppl dont vote either...
I still think that CCP should be the people to effectively 'interview' candidates from all areas (null, low, empire, pvp, trade) and they choose who they think is the best person to be on the CSM. Thats pretty much the only way to ensure fairness. The problem you describe is the primary downside of "pure" Democracy, that being http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majorityThis is why truly representative systems tend be more a form of Republicanism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RepublicanismYes, I agree that CCP should have a stronger hand in vetting and selecting the candidates based upon the theory that the CSM's function is to filter through ideas and opinions to CCP from various player segments of the game. As things are now, the Goons and certain Zero interests are too strongly represented. I'm surpised that anyone other than the Goons are even in the CSM. If the Mittani coordinated and allocated his troop's votes better, he could capture all the CSM seats. Something that would benefit the vast majority of the EVE playerbase would be proportional representation and selected transferable votes because in the present system a big chunk of the voting share is effectively "wasted" by people voting for this or that candidate, each one of a dozen or more who receive fewer than the minimum needed to gain a seat. With transferable votes there would be a lot more representation of the non-Goon interest on the CSM, because people could then delineate their votes to go to Candidate Y in the event that Candidate X is not elected, and so on. Right now one of the big advantages that an organized voting bloc like the Clusterfuck Coalition has over the rest of the game is that all of their votes go to specified candidates which will almost surely win positions whereas the rest of the game's population is left to blindly pick one of the other horses in the race and is left with no recourse or representation once that horse loses. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 21:57:00 -
[41] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:Im sorry but learn about democracy! The only thing democratic is the freedom to vote. Apart from that you votes ARE GUARANTEED! its basically FIXED!! its your own damn alliance mates voting for you, therefore its FIXED!! Why don't you organize a political party then? With respect, if this was a real concern of yours then you've had nearly an entire year since the elections for CSM6 and during that time I don't see you having put together a voting bloc to challenge The Mittani or the other candidates whose seat of power rests upon organized voting. If you want to fight them, then do so; otherwise, you are just making a lot of discontented noise on an alt. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Messoroz
AQUILA INC 0ccupational Hazzard
145
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:This is actually not the issue at all. The rigged part of the voting process comes from multiple account holders and accounts purchased with Plex, combined with ISK faucets that only Null Sec alliances have access to. What ISK faucets would that be, seeing as how all faucets are a available in all space?
I think highsec bears are also ignoring their incursion faucet. |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Ira Theos wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:WhyTry1 wrote:I have no faith in the election voting process at all.
A candidate basically has his hundreds of alliance mate votes, and their alts on top. Pretty much seals the candidates seat and we can say is pretty much rigged voting..
People in small corps/alliances even though they may have lots of eve experience, would never get voted because of this.. So thats why i guess a lot of ppl dont stand and ppl dont vote either...
I still think that CCP should be the people to effectively 'interview' candidates from all areas (null, low, empire, pvp, trade) and they choose who they think is the best person to be on the CSM. Thats pretty much the only way to ensure fairness. No it isn't because all that would happen then is CCP would be accused of picking people who they have person relationships with. So you would prefer to have it populated with people who have a personal relationship with the Mittani? (and before anyone asks, I'm not an alt of the OP and don't know him at all.) Your point is what? Whether you hate or like The Mittani, the reason he is able to get so many votes is because of his influence in game. Maybe in a few years if you have done as half as much as he has done then maybe you can get people to vote for you instead. Also, if we follow your idea then the The Mittani is guaranteed a place on the CSM for life considering he is good friends with many CCP employees, so your idea is even more fail. My point is that the Goons are over-represented in the CSM and always will be if CSM seats are determined by simple majority voting. The Mittani's votes are due to his position as head cheese in SomethingAwful.com and has nothing to do with his position in Eve. He has this influence in any game the Goons touch solely by reason of this fact. The Mittani hasn't "done" anything in Eve but coordinate Ass-Hattery. and finally, if we follow my suggestion of Republican form of representation in choosing the CSM members, both the Eve community and CCP would benefit due to a more complete voicing of player segments as a result. The Mittani, AKA Numismancer on Something Awful, is not the "head cheese". He is not even a moderator. He is just a random guy with a registered username who happens to play EVE. By contrast, Weaselior and VIle Rat, a couple of important people in GoonWaffe, are moderators on Something Awful. By your logic shouldn't they be the CEO of GoonWaffe, or the guy giving huge speeches at the State of the Goonion, or the ones that everyone hates on the CSM? Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1020
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:05:00 -
[44] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:The Mittani, AKA Numismancer on Something Awful, is not the "head cheese". He is not even a moderator. He is just a random guy with a registered username who happens to play EVE. By contrast, Weaselior and VIle Rat, a couple of important people in GoonWaffe, are moderators on Something Awful. By your logic shouldn't they be the CEO of GoonWaffe, or the guy giving huge speeches at the State of the Goonion, or the ones that everyone hates on the CSM?
Vile Rat is on the CSM, and I think at least most people hate him. |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
449
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:06:00 -
[45] - Quote
The Mittani is the leader of Something Awful? News to me. I didn't even think the place had a leader.
Whatever. I, for one, welcome our posting overlord. http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4614
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:My point is that the Goons are over-represented in the CSM and always will be if CSM seats are determined by simple majority voting. Good thing that CSM seats are not determined by simple majority voting, then. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:10:00 -
[47] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Lyris Nairn wrote:The Mittani, AKA Numismancer on Something Awful, is not the "head cheese". He is not even a moderator. He is just a random guy with a registered username who happens to play EVE. By contrast, Weaselior and VIle Rat, a couple of important people in GoonWaffe, are moderators on Something Awful. By your logic shouldn't they be the CEO of GoonWaffe, or the guy giving huge speeches at the State of the Goonion, or the ones that everyone hates on the CSM? Vile Rat is on the CSM, and I think at least most people hate him. Oh. Well, okay then. Point. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:WhyTry1 wrote:I have no faith in the election voting process at all.
A candidate basically has his hundreds of alliance mate votes, and their alts on top. Pretty much seals the candidates seat and we can say is pretty much rigged voting..
People in small corps/alliances even though they may have lots of eve experience, would never get voted because of this.. So thats why i guess a lot of ppl dont stand and ppl dont vote either...
I still think that CCP should be the people to effectively 'interview' candidates from all areas (null, low, empire, pvp, trade) and they choose who they think is the best person to be on the CSM. Thats pretty much the only way to ensure fairness. True, but the null dudes give **** about that they think they are beter and stuff.... Why do you think that? We're not all egotistical jerks. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
453
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:15:00 -
[49] - Quote
...Just most of us. http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Ai Shun
205
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:17:00 -
[50] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:Im sorry but learn about democracy! The only thing democratic is the freedom to vote. Apart from that you votes ARE GUARANTEED! its basically FIXED!! its your own damn alliance mates voting for you, therefore its FIXED!!
If you want to get in, why don't you just get the support? Could it be because your ideas are not compelling? Or because you cannot communicate your ideals clearly? Or you cannot contact people? Because you are too lazy to work for a strong position within EVE Online? Because you cannot get support?
|

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
187
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:25:00 -
[51] - Quote
This isn't true....
It's a matter of effort.
Although I did not like Ankhesentapemkah she was voted into the CSM with the second highest votes of any candidate. And every other CSM candidate hated her. She got her votes via forum campaigns and IN-GAME going through all the popular mission systems and campaigning via local and mass mails.
She was anti-pirate, anti-griefer, anti-everything that wasn't faction warfare, missions running or pve related. She even went as far as to post that anybody who pirates and suicide ganks in-game are low life scum in real life that should be "dealt" with. (Yeah she was a bit off kilter)
Sadly, she didn't exactly pan out and her supporters were let down after she was removed from the CSM due to an NDA breach... And throwing metal spoons at other CSM across the table... :/
In any sense, nobody else has bothered to even make a serious effort since then, but she is proof that even the most unlikely candidates can get elected onto the CSM. I didn't like her, but her vote count proved that people wanted somebody like her to represent them, and I guess that's all that really matters.
LOL I actually get the shivers just bringing her up due to how bad that entire situation turned out. But she really is the perfect example to use in a reply to "CSM ELECTION IS RIGGED!" threads like this one. |

Imma outbidYOU
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:27:00 -
[52] - Quote
the csm members should have term limits. and any alliances with ccp employess should not be allowed to join as this is a form of insider trading. |

Ilany
Nightingale Enterprises
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:32:00 -
[53] - Quote
Andski wrote: tippia, a long-time eve-o poster vs "WhyTry1" some nobody posting with an NPC corp alt
I wonder whose opinion is more relevant hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Lol. Goon noob tells alt noob that forum ***** noob has been around for 3 whole years. 
I'm not sure that "rigging" is the right word, but I agree with the OP that the current voting system cannot create a committee that reflects the interests of the player base. In a small group each delegate ought to be representative of a large proportion of the population, not the niche interests of 3-4% of customers. That's clearly not right.
However, I disagree with the idea that CCP should be in any way select candidates - that defeats the purpose. What they could do is stream them into specialised brackets (e.g. 3x 0.0 reps, 3 hi-sec/industry reps, 1 low-sec rep, 1 WH rep??) and each customer gets one vote for one person to one slot on the committee (no AV). It wouldn't stop the Goons voting Mittani into a slot, but it would allow for a bit of balance. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1773
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 22:59:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ilany wrote:Andski wrote: tippia, a long-time eve-o poster vs "WhyTry1" some nobody posting with an NPC corp alt
I wonder whose opinion is more relevant hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Lol. Goon noob tells alt noob that forum ***** noob has been around for 3 whole years. 
nobody gives a **** about your opinion andski for csm7~ |

Weiland Taur
Ceptic Innovations Rebel Alliance of New Eden
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 23:22:00 -
[55] - Quote
Dztrgovac wrote:This isn't tyranny of majority. This is 15% of game population being organized into strong blocks being guaranteed to take all CSM seats. Vast majority of players will know nothing about the candidates available and either vote randomly of just not vote. EVE was supposed to be a game and game is supposed to be fun. But CCP has given too much influence and importance to CSM causing them to actually have quite a impact on game development and balance.
I have read in several different threads this accusation of CSM influence on the game. Do you know of any documentation that supports this? Besides the Mittani taking a great deal of credit for things lacking documented proof the last major case of player influence that seemed documented was the Incarna fallout.
And the voting patterns seem to be relative to real world examples with most of the players either uninterested in the meta politics and or believing their vote won't matter. The ability to know about candidates is there, the information is there and unlike real life equivalents no one is trying to make it harder or impossible for eve players to get the information needed and to vote.
Per the OP, in no way does having a large group that will vote for you somehow prove unsupported allegations of election rigging. Certain groups in Eve could have the same massive voting pool but fail to mobilize it.
|

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
187
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 23:32:00 -
[56] - Quote
I know I keep pointing to this, but AGAIN perceptions about the CSM elections being rigged are not at all the case. In CSM5 the second highest vote count was by a girl that did not get along with any of the power blocks, was anti pirate, anti-grief, anti-anything not PVE/FW/or industrial.
The problem is nobody has put the effort in to get those votes since her. Ankhesentapemkah won primarily through industrialists, people in NPC corps, and mission runners voting for her.
Now what IS true is that it is easier for somebody representing a power block to get voted in with much less effort than a newcomer from HISEC. But that doesn't mean its rigged, nor that it's completely out of reach.
CSM5 Elections - Results
The elections for the fifth CSM have ended. This election saw a record turnout both in terms of numbers of votes and the proportion of eligible voters that chose to vote. This election was a tight race with some rather fierce campaigning going on. I'm proud to be able to announce that the delegates of the fifth Council of Stellar Management will be:
Votes-Character Name-Real Name-Country 4,116 Mynxee Carole Pivarnik United States 3,360 Ankhesentapemkah Eva Jobse Netherlands 2,521 Dierdra Vaal Valentijn Geirnaert Netherlands 2,196 Korvin Andrey Antonov Russia 1,649 Vuk Lau Vuk Lau Serbia 1,553 TeaDaze Jason Renouf Guernsey 1,519 Meissa Anunthiel Stephan Pirson Belgium 1,463 Trebor Daehdoow Robert Woodhead United States 1,260 Sokratesz Tim Heusschen Netherlands |

Buff Jesus
20
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 23:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
The CSM elections work the same way elections in real life work. Yes, an every-man from nowhere can get elected but they will have a much harder time of it than someone with full political party backing who gets more media coverage.
Study real world democratic processes before you claim a virtual one that doesn't serve your individual needs is "rigged". New Favorite Eve Hobby: Bumping BS's with a Crow. |

Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 23:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
I had, some months ago, decided to vote for anyone endorsed by the worst possible null-sec alliance. I had, back then, the intention of voting for whomever the IRC HC decided to endorse, since personal experience with the HC told me that such a person would be most likely to "ruin EVE". I also pondered on the chance of a known botter getting my vote, since known botters most certainly are "ruining EVE". Now, however, after reading this huge number of threads against Mittani or GSF or CFC dominance in the CSM, I might vote for whoever GSF/CFC endorses, since popular opinion is that they are most likely to "ruin EVE".
Now, some of you might ask for the logic behind this decision? Well, since the launch of Incursion (I started around when Incursion launch-date was announced), I've seen that everything that is about to ruin EVE makes for either a great feature or at least a noteworthy experience. And this CSM was apparently predicted to destroy EVE the most, yet they were a part of what made CCP back out of the Incarna way of thinking and into Crucible & "War Themed Expansion". Granted, not everything is perfect, and probably neither CSM7, but if things meant to ruin EVE either makes great additions or at least good experiences to learn from, well, I'll vote for total annihilation every day of the week.
Thanks Mittani, Vile Rat, GSF & CFC, you'll always keep that honorary -10 standing in my heart. <3 |

Ilany
Nightingale Enterprises
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 00:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
Andski wrote:Ilany wrote:Andski wrote: tippia, a long-time eve-o poster vs "WhyTry1" some nobody posting with an NPC corp alt I wonder whose opinion is more relevant hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Lol. Goon noob tells alt noob that forum ***** noob has been around for 3 whole years.  nobody gives a **** about your opinion
What, and you think anyone apart from goon circle-jerkers care about your bilious drivel? Dream on.
Buff Jesus wrote:The CSM elections work the same way elections in real life work. Yes, an every-man from nowhere can get elected but they will have a much harder time of it than someone with full political party backing who gets more media coverage.
The difference here is that the percentage of the population that votes for the candidates who actually get in is probably equivalent to the percentage of the population in major real-world democracies that votes for those "every man" candidates. You know, those weird people in silly costumes who appear behind the major party candidates on the platform when the results are called... except they win. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
231
|
Posted - 2012.01.29 00:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:I'm surpised that anyone other than the Goons are even in the CSM. If the Mittani coordinated and allocated his troop's votes better, he could capture all the CSM seats.
You are surprised because you don't get how their mentality works.
Nyx in hi sec: http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7929/highsecnyxforsale.jpg |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |