Pages: [1] |
1. Alphas and F2P Have Failed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lilol' me wrote: [quote=Arthur Aihaken] The fact that old alliances have control of everything and always will. Until CCP gives the same opportunities to every new player then nothing will change. There is no way for example that a new person o...
- by v3locity - at 2017.03.22 14:14:43
|
2. Can we get rid of CSM after the recent PLEX insider trading fiasco? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Issler Dainze wrote: The players could change the nature of the CSM if they cared enough, but in the end they don't. In fact the number of Eve pod pilots that care enough to get involved in trying to bring about real changes to Eve fundamental...
- by v3locity - at 2017.03.22 13:54:01
|
3. CCP - Remove the racial skills training limit for alpha clones!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lady Ayeipsia wrote: So wait... Limit it to 5 mil SP, but in theory a new player could waste a bunch of that training ship skills and not have enough left to train the necessary mod skills? That seems like a really good way to screw over a new ...
- by v3locity - at 2016.11.16 18:11:01
|
4. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sir Renalard wrote: CCP Mimic wrote: Hi again everyone, Just a quick update on what we are currently working on in regards to the feedback you have given us so far: We are looking at combining several dynamic camera actions into a single tog...
- by v3locity - at 2016.07.01 22:29:45
|
5. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Mimic wrote: Hi again everyone, Just a quick update on what we are currently working on in regards to the feedback you have given us so far: We are looking at combining several dynamic camera actions into a single toggle-able option, that w...
- by v3locity - at 2016.07.01 22:28:56
|
6. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Bad Bobby wrote: If cost is a consideration, I'd happily fork over 200 PLEX towards the cost of adding the toggle. I'm sure we could do a whip round, PLEX for accessibility or whatever. It's not ideal, but if the options are to pay a premium f...
- by v3locity - at 2016.06.30 22:36:30
|
7. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sergey Hawk wrote: CCP Darwin wrote: Kremlath wrote: I realize that, I'm just pulling your chain, perhaps that doesn't come through well. The main point is I'd like a response about the camera issue. I don't have any details to share, ...
- by v3locity - at 2016.06.30 21:59:35
|
8. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
marly cortez wrote: Hope it performs better on the PS4 than it does currently on a PC. So they sell Dust to a bunch of people then just abandon it. Now it's worthless. Pull horrifying crap like this, they actually think it's good? That i...
- by v3locity - at 2016.06.30 21:53:04
|
9. Announcement:June release 118.6 - General feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tao Dolcino wrote: Is that your version of immersion ? Does that appear even slightly realistic, believable to any of you ? And this scene is repeated for each ship entering in station ? And what if you own many ships and want to bord another ...
- by v3locity - at 2016.06.30 12:52:42
|
10. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Batelle wrote: ashley Eoner wrote: I'm annoyed because I just reactivated some of my accounts before I ran into this thread. Now CCP will take that as tacit approval of this kind of crap... Stuff like this helped me decide to quit last tim...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.28 11:30:00
|
11. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hasikan Miallok wrote: stoicfaux wrote: Morrigan LeSante wrote: That suggests horrible, horrible things for range unbonused hulls: RS/DNI/Geddon etc. I've uploaded a new spreadsheet with unbonused sentries and added pre-nerf Omnis for ...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.21 06:31:00
|
12. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: Tyberius Franklin wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: v3locity wrote: Test for you. Vexor Navy with 2 omni, one optimal one tracking. Use to do good damage at 55k with garde's Now you have to be within 30k an...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.21 06:27:00
|
13. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: v3locity wrote: Test for you. Vexor Navy with 2 omni, one optimal one tracking. Use to do good damage at 55k with garde's Now you have to be within 30k and the tracking still isn't as good, anything farther out i...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.21 06:22:00
|
14. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andy Landen wrote: As it is, EVERY other (non-drone) weapon system in the game is more tanky than drones, because they can't be targetted. Beat that for tankiness. Let drones attach to the ship's hull so that drone ships can maintain alignmen...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.21 03:10:00
|
15. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Test for you. Vexor Navy with 2 omni, one optimal one tracking. Use to do good damage at 55k with garde's Now you have to be within 35k to get the about the same, anything farther out is heavy misses. I haven't done extensive testing on tracking...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.21 02:55:00
|
16. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Omnidirectional Tracking Links - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: The Omnis will keep their same fitting requirements (a bit higher than TCs), will have a 10s duration, and will enjoy significantly lower cap use (4 cap per activation) compared to Tracking Computers. They will use exactly th...
- by v3locity - at 2014.01.18 13:48:00
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |