| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CSM and CCP Q&A - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: wtbrandomnamegenerator on 26/06/2009 18:54:07 Originally by: Traxio Nacho Very glad these questions were asked, I don't think Eve could carry on without them and fantastic detailed answers to boot what more can you ask for. ...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.26 18:53:00
|
2. Michael Jackson is dead - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Originally by: Dibblah San Originally by: Grez There's no proof that he did what he did. Just rumours and speculation. You cannot base an honest opinion of a man based on rumours and speculation. What he DID do was amazing. He was...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.26 14:48:00
|
3. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Had an idea about what to do about being docked in station and not seeing who's outside. Add a station service, that allows you to either- A) Scan (as in normal ship scanner) the outside of the station or B) actually view the outside of a sta...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.26 14:20:00
|
4. Michael Jackson is dead - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Paramedics responded to a 911 call around 12pm local time, finding Jackson unconscious and not breathing. They rushed him to the hospital (a 6 minute drive) performing CPR the entire trip, Jackson remained non responsive, and was comatose upon arr...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.25 23:18:00
|
5. MAcros gone???? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I heard that if you bend over and whistle "Dixie" in the raing, monkey's will fly out of your butt. Somehow, I bet mine has more factual basis.
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.25 01:04:00
|
6. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: wtbrandomnamegenerator on 24/06/2009 19:17:34 Originally by: Malcanis It's amazing the way people react when you threaten their comfort zone. Hey, who remembers when the nano-nerf was going to render the whole HAC class wor...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.24 19:17:00
|
7. low sec = low quality experience? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Bfoster If you are saying low sec is broken simply because of lag.. You are wrong.. Quit blobbing.. Blob=Lag.. Anywhere in eve.. High sec, low sec, null sec.. It is the eve gods punishment for being blobtards.. Your ...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.24 14:30:00
|
8. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron believe me, if scrambler took 220 CPU, it would be very upsetting indeed to fit it Give me a belt scanner that uses less than 35 CPU and I won't complain (but any such changes require NPC bounty boost) Core Pr...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.23 22:52:00
|
9. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ephemeron Originally by: Reachok It would be very upsetting to be forced to equip prove launchers just to do some farming. I agree with your entire post, save this bit here, because tbh, its very upsetting nee...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.23 21:11:00
|
10. CCP's new project: World of Darkness, introductory trailers - in Out of Pod Experience [original thread]
Originally by: Figurehead old werewolf was crap. so is new werewolf Mage the Acsension > Mage the Awakening Vampire the Requiem >>>>> Vampire the Masquerade That is all No. The writers pretty much butchered everyt...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.23 19:09:00
|
11. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Originally by: Neutrino Sunset <lots of quoting> So, can we agree that there is a set of changes to directional scanner and cov-ops cloak (at a minimum) that would make delayed Local in 0.0 feasibl...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.23 15:07:00
|
12. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul This thread is made on the premise that importing the WH mechanic as it is in currently in WH space, without changes, would be the cure for all woes in EVE. And that is exactly what Neutrino, I and some other ...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.23 07:33:00
|
13. Balancing - Identifying problems - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It seems that even though they were reading it, they chose to selectively ignore the outpouring of people wanting lvl 4 missions curtailed, and instead focused on stupid things like ECM drones.
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.22 19:50:00
|
14. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Neutrino Sunset I have some bad news for you Descrambled, it looks like ECM drones are about to get hit with the nerf hammer. http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1056041 I think some people took ex...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.22 17:04:00
|
15. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Wet Ferret Yes, remove it. So instead of: Quote: - Monitors local channel for hostiles We see: Quote: - Monitors directional scanner for ships outside of specified distance Don't worry, the constant e...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.22 03:11:00
|
16. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Razin Originally by: Venkul Mul The problem is that removing local will NOT cure that. The bots will had a SPAM SCAN feature and warp as soon as something enter range. Bots have no problem spamming scan every fe...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.21 19:34:00
|
17. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sky Marshal Edited by: Sky Marshal on 21/06/2009 16:19:00 Originally by: wtbrandomnamegenerator Just FYI, this IS about the macro problem, and the root of that problem is LOCAL, because thats what the macro's K...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.21 18:38:00
|
18. Stop with the DD nerf threads already! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pohbis There's a big difference between doing something on the test server and actually having the balls and ability to make it happen under real conditions. If someone wants to put the 30ish-something Titans on the line i...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.21 16:03:00
|
19. The Great DD Re-Envisioning - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: wtbrandomnamegenerator on 21/06/2009 15:56:43 Originally by: Serenthris Landry Originally by: iP0D ...an expensive glass cannon that melts in 30 seconds This seems just a tad inaccurate to me, either that or you...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.21 15:54:00
|
20. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: iP0D If you are concerned about macro abuse, which everybody should be in my opinion, make a thread about it, and make the case. Now back on topic, just which is it ... 1. macro abuse? 2. the state of Local? 3. the sta...
- by wtbrandomnamegenerator - at 2009.06.21 15:11:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |