Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Stil Harkonnen
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 18:57:00 -
[61]
supported. Not sure what else to say because any counter argument is just silly in my opinion.
|

Sytoru Hiroshyma
SkillzKillz
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 19:51:00 -
[62]
sounds like a plan!
|

Kelron Queldine
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 20:35:00 -
[63]
Suggested this ages ago and got ignored/misunderstood. So, yeah. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 20:46:00 -
[64]
Supported.
|

Destroyer1020
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 22:11:00 -
[65]
yay logistics boost....win
|

Random Womble
Emo Rangers Electric Monkey Overlords
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 23:06:00 -
[66]
Edited by: Random Womble on 31/05/2009 23:06:03 Argee with this not so much because of the logistics ships issue (and i fly logistics alot) but more because an outlaw cant even remote rep his own drones (normal ships not that important but fighters are a diffrent issue mainly due to cost) without getting global crim which tbh is just plain stupid.
Btw if you do fly logistics legitimately (i.e. player corp not hiding from wars to remote rep) go read PitBoss' Neutral/Alt Remote repping thread and make them see that giving remote repping an agression countdown would screw up logistics.
|

Kaito Haakkainen
|
Posted - 2009.05.31 23:58:00 -
[67]
|

Jhagiti Tyran
Mortis Angelus
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 10:46:00 -
[68]
Thumbs up. -
|

mduncan0341
Invicta. Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 14:05:00 -
[69]
supporting
|

Yorba
Gemini Technologies
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 16:06:00 -
[70]
Supported!
|
|

Kasi Kasai
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 16:43:00 -
[71]
Reppers being flagged was introduced for a reason.
Out of corp invulnerable reppers in high sec and faction wars, remember them? You want to wind the clock back to that?
No support. |

Grann Thefauto
Internal Anarchy
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 18:32:00 -
[72]
yup.
|

Larkonis TrassIer
Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 20:42:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Kasi Kasai Reppers being flagged was introduced for a reason.
Out of corp invulnerable reppers in high sec and faction wars, remember them? You want to wind the clock back to that?
No support.
Hi, did you even read the OP? This has nothing to do with neutral remote reppers in Hisec.
|

Stil Harkonnen
|
Posted - 2009.06.01 22:06:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Kasi Kasai Reppers being flagged was introduced for a reason.
Out of corp invulnerable reppers in high sec and faction wars, remember them? You want to wind the clock back to that?
No support.
read before posting PLEASE.
I need that facepalm picture cause i can't explain in words how stupid what you just said was...
We're dealing about people getting GCC cause they're remote repping outlaws WITHOUT GCC. explain a situation where somebody in a high sec war is going to be remote repping an outlaw from a different corp....
|

Kadere Isendre
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
|
Posted - 2009.06.02 03:20:00 -
[75]
100% supported in this corner. Lets make fair fights fair.
|

lollerwaffle
Sileo In Pacis The Space P0lice
|
Posted - 2009.06.03 03:05:00 -
[76]
Supported! (Makes no sense to undock a carrier just to rep pilots who are too cheap to pay for repairs/too lazy to dock and refit jk)
|

Raimo
Wrath of Fenris
|
Posted - 2009.06.10 21:21:00 -
[77]
Oh, this would be good... --- WOLFY is recruiting!
|

The Djego
Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 17:42:00 -
[78]
Supported.
Getting a 15 Minute GCC just by repping up 2-3 damaged ships with a Logistic(after a battle and after GCC) just because your mate is outlaw compleetly sucks.
Getting a GCC for repping someone that got GCC is fine, getting GCC and Sec penalty just because the target is a Outlaw isnŠt. 
---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|

Yahrr
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 01:57:00 -
[79]
supported
|

Kalintos Tyl
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 09:59:00 -
[80]
REEPING YOUR OWN DRONES MAKE GCC FOR YOU IF YOU ARE UNDER -5 THIS IS RIDICULUS |
|

Guru Saurfang
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 11:21:00 -
[81]
Why was this mechanic introduced in the first place?
Fully support ! |

Imertu Solientai
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 23:02:00 -
[82]
Supported. Stupid mechanic is stupid and pretty terrible. |

Natasha Zenith
Crushed Ambitions
|
Posted - 2009.06.16 03:18:00 -
[83]
Yes please, its just silly the way it works now.
|

Dallin Dominion
The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.07.15 11:04:00 -
[84]
Supported!
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke |

Robbie Robot
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 03:28:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Carnelian X Edited by: Carnelian X on 29/05/2009 23:55:11 At the moment we have the following farcical scene:
Pirate Fleet On Gate - gun ignores them 2nd Pirate Fleet warps in - gun ignores them Pirates fight each other - gun ignores them Pirates pop - pirates are podded - gun ignore them Cyno goes up - capitals start shooting -gun ignores them Someone puts a remote rep on.... HOLY ****E!!! HES USING A REMOTE REP!!!! GET HIM!!!!!!!!!!
Youve got a situation where capital ships are blatting hell out of each other without even the slightest interest from the gate guns but if you DARE put on one remot rep - they go ape
SUPPORT THIS
Quoted for hilarity. I have flown a logistics for a few weeks. It is really silly that I get GCC when I rep people that don't have it.
a quick question, if I rep someone that has a security status of 1.0 that has GCC, do I get GCC then? I'd assume yes, why not just keep that mechanic. You rep someone with GCC, you get GCC, and the same sec status hit they get. Its bad enough that if you fly a logistics you don't get on the killmail. <this end up> |

Th3rm
Malevolent Intentions Dark Solar Empire
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 06:22:00 -
[86]
I agree :)
|

irion felpamy
Minmatar HellJumpers Corp
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 09:04:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Sytoru Hiroshyma sounds like a plan!
You are just to lazy to rat.
Just to check if someone attacks a blinky he can be RR'ed without taking a GCC? Basicly allowing you to aid an outlaw against a +sec pilot without a GCC. Need less of this no-agression RR stupidity not more.
|

Ancy Denaries
The Confederate Navy Forever Unbound
|
Posted - 2009.09.21 13:39:00 -
[88]
MASSIVE support. If you rep an outlaw you shouldn't incurr a GCC unless he currently has a GCC. Repping an outlaw should however work the same way as repping anyone else = Agressed towards any people HE is agressed to. ----- Why doesn't anyone ever read the forums before posting? EVE is a game of adaptation and planning. Adapt or die. |

Actumarius
Malevolent Intentions
|
Posted - 2009.09.24 01:34:00 -
[89]
Yes Pls
|

Cpt Branko
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.09.24 02:48:00 -
[90]
Supported, hell yes.
Originally by: Ancy Denaries MASSIVE support. If you rep an outlaw you shouldn't incurr a GCC unless he currently has a GCC. Repping an outlaw should however work the same way as repping anyone else = Agressed towards any people HE is agressed to.
This. Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |