Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

techzer0
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2009.08.30 11:36:00 -
[121]
Originally by: steveid
Originally by: Irida Mershkov
Originally by: steveid the only problem I see is that BC should have BS sized rigs. If that is the case already then all good imo.
Any reason on that? I mean they use cruiser-sized mods, so why battleship sized rigs?
My reasoning is not based upon t1 rigs which are not a problem but t2 rigs. You are essentially adding another 20% onto passive tanks on battlecruisers which are already very decent on most races ships. Where previously a t2 rig fit would cost you 600 mil now it will cost you 120 which is of course more than worth it.
As an example some passive tanked battlecruisers, not overheated, no implants t2 gear and rigs:
Drake 1200 dps Harbinger 855 dps Myrmidon 1150 dps Hurricane 932 dps
now I'd probably agree with you if you stated that this is a problem with passive tanks and not with BS / BC sized t2 rigs as you can doing this get an Ishtar to 818 dps tanked but I think the issue I stated exasperates it.
Who fits for 100% tank? Bait ships and mission runners, thats it. PVP Ships fit damage mods, scrams, mwds... show me setups with those included that tank that much DPS.
Lets make it 2x damage mods per ship, since I wouldn't want to make you try fitting 3 because that might blow your mind  ------------
Originally by: Nexus Kinnon I could outgay you even without my pink tutu. >.>
|

Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.08.30 11:44:00 -
[122]
Originally by: steveid As an example some passive tanked battlecruisers, not overheated, no implants t2 gear and rigs:
Drake 1200 dps Harbinger 855 dps Myrmidon 1150 dps Hurricane 932 dps
now I'd probably agree with you if you stated that this is a problem with passive tanks
What is this drivel? Nobody with a clue uses a passive tank, nobody with a clue fits SPRs, a ship fitted in that fashion is 100% useless. Your DPS-tanked numbers are classic EFT bull****, of no meaning or consequence for actual Eve reality.
|

Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.08.30 12:10:00 -
[123]
guardian just got 10% more ridiculous
[Guardian, 1600 AB] 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Internal Force Field Array I Adaptive Nano Plating II Thermic Plating II Reactor Control Unit II
Y-S8 Hydrocarbon I Afterburners Conjunctive Radar ECCM Scanning Array I
Large Remote Armor Repair System II Large Remote Armor Repair System II Large Remote Armor Repair System II Large Remote Armor Repair System II Large Remote Armor Repair System II Large 'Regard' I Power Projector
Ancillary Current Router I Ancillary Current Router I
beats 800mm plate + trimarks
those energy grid rigs need a drawback, pronto... or boost the scimitar's power grid and i'll quit yappin'  - putting the gist back into logistics |

Lemmy Kravitz
|
Posted - 2009.08.30 14:26:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Removal Tool If the small rigs are cheap enough, Destroyers will rival Assault Ships, Ishkur will still be the best AF, and the good T1 cruisers will be even better (Rupter!)
And I guess T2 cruiser hulls will be cheaper to fit. Same for BC/CS if they use Med sized rigs as I expect.
Hopefully more noobs will feel capable of pvp. 
I've been waiting for this day. I rigged out a dessie one time just for giggles and it omgwtfpwn'd a couple of AF's. But at the same time I don't think the AF's were rigged. Either way, it's a good day to be a dessi pilot, people will be afraid... very afraid.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |