Everything in the game that could be percieved as a negative by any player at any time is the fault of Goonswarm and the influence we obviously must have on CCP (did you hear 2 former members work for CCP now???????????????????????). Our influence is so strong that we managed to convince some Icelandic fellows to create a non-consentual PVP game 9 years ago. Just to make sure we didn't get found out, we waited 3 years to even truly ~reveal ourselves~ in game, but unfortunately, the intrepid AFK mining Hulk crowd has found us out.

I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.

You should clean your keyboard more often, that ? key seems stuck. But yes, everything is subjective as seems your point but it does seem the balance that existed is gone. Large alliances seem to exert their will on the entire population but the goons will fade into memory at some point as every other bully alliance has. I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.

Great idea, instead of fighting Goonswarm Federation, you could be fighting Goonswarm1, Goonswarm2, and Goonswarm3!

Fun fact: The corporation GoonWaffe was originally created when population sizes on corporations was far smaller, and the original GoonFleet was full to capacity. Funny how that didn't change anything at all, did it?

I think you are mistaken about alliance. If goonswarm for example were forced to split it would find its loyalties diverge. Its just human nature as demonstrated many times in experiments (blue vs red arm band exp. comes to mind). When the corp you mentioned was full it still was able to make an alliance corp, so its not the same.

Ahh I get it, we'd stop working together ~just because~.

Ahh I get it, we'd stop working together ~just because~.

Enjoy your break, its good sometimes. Hopefully CCP restores balance soon (tm)

Tal

I believe so, if it were a complete break, its human nature.

But it's not a complete break, not a real one, anyway. It'd be like saying because one fleet is full it'd never be able to fully co-operate with the second one that formed immediately afterwards because it's ~different~. The only thing that'd truly be different is the ticker name.

There are many examples of what happens when a group breaks, either voluntarily or forced, which reinforce my premis. Its just basic sociology.

And yet I literally told you what happened when our group "broke" in the past when mechanics forced it to happen: nothing, aside from nuisances with things like corp hangars etc. This time will be different though, I'm sure!

All I found was this

A corp being forced to split while still being in the same alliance is not the same. We disagree, time for both of us to move onto something else.

A corp being forced to split while still being in the same alliance is not the same. We disagree, time for both of us to move onto something else.

Please see my signature, it describes you. Also, you need to learn the meaning of the word contradiction. And as for miners not having hundreds of billions of ISK, perhaps you should talk to Chribba.

Yesterday one of my hulks got killed by 7 ships in in hi sec. All of these players had a security rating of -8 or worse. Im very cautious when I mine but you cant hide a Hulk very easily. Normally the high-sec game mechanics work pretty good. CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics. Yes I know this is a sandbox but if someone is circumventing the game mechanics, its an exploit. Im not going to plead proverty. I have enouph ISK to play my three accounts for several more years. Why should I if game mechanics allow 7 players with a security rating less than -8 to play in high-sec with emmunity. When CCP has returned hi-sec to more reasonable game play I will return.

I think all high-sec players should think about taking a vacation from EVE. The only thing CCP cares about is monitary loss. This is the only way high-sec players can get thier attention.

Pirates that want my stuff can meet me in Jita at 1930 hours on Saturday.

I have only one question.....HOW?!?!!!?!

[Seriously, how....how did he get concorded without any weapons?

if ccp is smart they should have a customer portfolio with the make up, amount and general player profiles. it should tell them that the long term players (the ones that drives the sandbox (o.o dwellers)) are 0.0 players and that high sec character amounts are mosty alts of 0.0 players.... in short: high sec players pnly play a fraction of the time 0.0 players are playing.... 0.0 players make this game... why should ccp continue to listen to these players that quit anyway in a few months? expecialy afyrr the big player decrease when there was a cataclism of canceled subscriptiond due this 5months ago?

quit whining, go do social like eve is desighned and join a 0.0 mining corp or whine that ccp isnt promoting eve more as a social game where it actualy is a social unwritten rule that players should join a player driven corp...


just a quick brainfart

That's a contradiction to:



If you have 100B in the bank you don't mine. (Unless you are a botter ofc.)

GǪit should tell them that the long term players (the ones that drives the sandbox (o.o dwellers)) are 0.0 players and that high sec character amounts are mosty alts of 0.0 players....

quit whining, go do social like eve is desighned and join a 0.0 mining corp or whine that ccp isnt promoting eve more as a social game where it actualy is a social unwritten rule that players should join a player driven corp...

There are an awful lot more people messing about in low sec and wormholes than null sec.

Yesterday one of my hulks got killed by 7 ships in in hi sec. All of these players had a security rating of -8 or worse. Im very cautious when I mine but you cant hide a Hulk very easily. Normally the high-sec game mechanics work pretty good. CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics. Yes I know this is a sandbox but if someone is circumventing the game mechanics, its an exploit. Im not going to plead proverty. I have enouph ISK to play my three accounts for several more years. Why should I if game mechanics allow 7 players with a security rating less than -8 to play in high-sec with emmunity. When CCP has returned hi-sec to more reasonable game play I will return.

I think all high-sec players should think about taking a vacation from EVE. The only thing CCP cares about is monitary loss. This is the only way high-sec players can get thier attention.

Pirates that want my stuff can meet me in Jita at 1930 hours on Saturday.