EVE Search - [eb] - eveboard.com

All Channels

Skill Discussions

[eb] - eveboard.com

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Mistress Mayhem Caldari Solitude Empires Kahora Catori	Posted - 2009.10.09 19:06:00 - [91] No.1 in missile skills I rule \o/ MM
Florio Blue Republic	Posted - 2009.10.10 10:11:00 - [92] Really cool, thanks Chribba. xx
Viggen Caldari The Lunatic Asylum Notorious Organization of Brothers	Posted - 2009.10.10 12:49:00 - [93] Originally by: Chribba The global rank is your average of all categories, so while someone may be #1 in a few categories he/she could be ranked very low globally (it's still in the works, currently if you fail to place yourself in a category you will receive a 1000 point "deduction" placing you way back, this is so no low-sp alts which have not trained would end up in the overall good places). Could you add the global "points" for display somewhere, so we can see how many we have in relation to others? Maybe place our overall global points into the personal "pilot ranks" section, and/or into the full listings page on the board of fame.
Amateratsu Caldari The Pegasus Project	Posted - 2009.10.10 21:09:00 - [94] Bug Report:- There appears to be a mismatch between the global rank "total skillpoints" and pilot ranks for same catagory. eg if i look at the fulllist for total skillpoints im shown at position 72, but in my sheet/pilot ranks it shows me at position 79. The bug appears to effect all chars listed starting at position 11 and the diffeence between the 2 ranks increases by 1 pt every 10 positions. eg char at position 11 is shown at position 12 in his sheet, char at position 20 is shown at 22 in his sheet and so on. otherwise all good á

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.10.11 11:22:00 - [95] Originally by: Amateratsu Bug Report:- Will look into that, it could be a bug depending on what you allow to display or not (and/or a sorting issue). Win a Cap Recharger II BPO for 10M ISK

RaTTuS BIG Libertas Fidelitas	Posted - 2009.10.12 08:36:00 - [96] \o/ I just have to purchase the 4 BIG ones now ... -- 3 Titans Lottery EB \| Capital
Zilnam Haa Gallente Brood of Redemption	Posted - 2009.10.12 20:18:00 - [97] Nice work m8! Thanks for the service & your time to do it
Caiman Graystock Caldari Comrades in Construction	Posted - 2009.10.13 08:27:00 - [98] Edited by: Caiman Graystock on 13/10/2009 08:27:26 This is a superb effort, thanks very much. Nice to see something working nice and nippy from the get go, with plenty of features to boot. A shame we can't spy on your sheet tho, Chribba. Originally by: CCP Whisper So you're going to have to do some actual thinking... Boo hoo. Cry some more.
Viscount Hood V I R I I Cult of War	Posted - 2009.10.13 10:42:00 - [99] Very nice site. Much better than the competitors especially because of the rankings page. Wow I made it to the top 10 in missiles, though not for long I suspect as this site becomes more known.
dosperado Denial of Service	Posted - 2009.10.13 19:15:00 - [100] Edited by: dosperado on 13/10/2009 19:26:18 You can add another more or less important information to every pilots charcater sheet, namely security status. Just take the unmodified concord standing and display it as security status below the clone information. And add rankings for "good" and "bad" pilots, maybe a useful addition. You can also calculate faction/corp/agent standings with the given character skills (connections/diplomacy) in addition to the effective standings which are shown at the moment. Just like the standing tab ingame. And add 2 digits to full numbers.. eg 9.00 instead of 9..and use a "." for separators instead of ",". Looks more EVE-compliant then. ____________________ Security Status 9.0
testirania	Posted - 2009.10.14 09:01:00 - [101] One feature from your site that I wouldnt mind seeing being implemented in Evemon is the skillque, funny that they havent thought of that and added it to one of the most prominent 3rd party softwares yet
dosperado Denial of Service	Posted - 2009.10.14 14:23:00 - [102] Edited by: dosperado on 14/10/2009 14:23:39 Ahh you added 2 digits to integer number in the standings tab, great!...can you also add two digits to integer numbers within the shown security status in the character tab? e.g. 5,00 instead of 5? thx! Only the rankings for worst and best security status is missing...I think that would fit best into "misc ranks" if you are going to implement that. Keep the good work on! ____________________ Security Status 9.0
RedLion Caldari State Constructions	Posted - 2009.10.14 17:24:00 - [103] Edited by: RedLion on 14/10/2009 17:26:12 I would love more privacy around the actual skill distribution and attribute distribution. That would mean that it would be easier to not be "anonymous". And if it doen't do too many requests to the database, it would be cool if you could get more rank info on the profile page. Such as (Total skill rank 100 of 600) and under gunnery (Rank 20 of 600) etc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.10.14 21:10:00 - [104] Edited by: Chribba on 14/10/2009 21:10:45 Originally by: dosperado Edited by: dosperado on 14/10/2009 14:23:39 Ahh you added 2 digits to integer number in the standings tab, great!...can you also add two digits to integer numbers within the shown security status in the character tab? e.g. 5,00 instead of 5? thx! Only the rankings for worst and best security status is missing...I think that would fit best into "misc ranks" if you are going to implement that. Keep the good work on! Sec-rating will be added soon yep. Also revamping the whole ranks stuff so it gets much faster. Originally by: RedLion Edited by: RedLion on 14/10/2009 17:30:28 I would love more privacy around the actual skill distribution and attribute distribution. That would mean that it would be easier to not be "anonymous". (And ofc certificates, ships, standings and blueprints also) Explain more please, not sure I understand what you mean. Win a Cap Recharger II BPO for 10M ISK

Mag's the united Negative Ten.	Posted - 2009.10.14 21:54:00 - [105] Originally by: Chribba Originally by: RedLion I would love more privacy around the actual skill distribution and attribute distribution. That would mean that it would be easier to not be "anonymous". (And ofc certificates, ships, standings and blueprints also) Explain more please, not sure I understand what you mean. I think he means, show amount in that skill area but not the actual skill set. Rather like in-eve used to allow. So all you will see is.. DRONES a total of 4,854,705 skillpoints. ELECTRONICS a total of 5,813,300 skillpoints. ENGINEERING a total of 7,250,200 skillpoints. etc
RedLion Caldari State Constructions	Posted - 2009.10.14 22:07:00 - [106] Originally by: Mag's Originally by: Chribba Originally by: RedLion I would love more privacy around the actual skill distribution and attribute distribution. That would mean that it would be easier to not be "anonymous". (And ofc certificates, ships, standings and blueprints also) Explain more please, not sure I understand what you mean. I think he means, show amount in that skill area but not the actual skill set. Rather like in-eve used to allow. So all you will see is.. DRONES a total of 4,854,705 skillpoints. ELECTRONICS a total of 5,813,300 skillpoints. ENGINEERING a total of 7,250,200 skillpoints. etc Yes, I would like to keep my skills, (thus also certificates, ships, and blueprints) a secret, but I don't mind showing my total skill points. Perhaps like that guy said, even category wise. I would think it would be most interesting to get as little Anonymous people as possible. Also, couldn't find Chribba! :P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Caiman Graystock Caldari Comrades in Construction	Posted - 2009.10.14 22:55:00 - [107] Edited by: Caiman Graystock on 14/10/2009 22:55:06 Chances of being able to click corp names on here and have it list all non-anonymous members of that corp? In SP order perhaps? http://eveboard.com/fullranks/44-corporation-most-sp Originally by: CCP Whisper So you're going to have to do some actual thinking... Boo hoo. Cry some more.
RedLion Caldari State Constructions	Posted - 2009.10.15 00:43:00 - [108] or go to 1man corps like mine and find exact for that person :P - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The Gallenteans must be destroyed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Amateratsu Caldari The Pegasus Project	Posted - 2009.10.15 14:48:00 - [109] I get the following error when looking at standings/agents in my sheet Toiniainen Omu Lv1 Q State War Academy 10.00 ( Microsoft VBScript runtime error '800a005e' Invalid use of Null: 'Replace' /includes.asp, line 830 And how the hell does one get a security status of 9.00? I thought +5.00 was as high as it goes. Are the security status ranks mutually exclusive or does it record your highest ever and your lowest ever? á
Viggen Caldari The Lunatic Asylum Notorious Organization of Brothers	Posted - 2009.10.15 16:01:00 - [110] Edited by: Viggen on 15/10/2009 16:06:24 Thanks for adding the points to the board of fame list. Now I can see what I need to get to move up through the ranks :) One question though.. What is the formula for the points? No matter how many different ways I work it out I always come up with different points values. Edit: Security status goes up to 5 from running missions etc, but any higher you need to kill officer/commander spawn npcs in 0.0 space. (I think thats how it works anyway).
Amateratsu Caldari The Pegasus Project	Posted - 2009.10.15 16:26:00 - [111] Originally by: Viggen Security status goes up to 5 from running missions etc, but any higher you need to kill officer/commander spawn npcs in 0.0 space. (I think thats how it works anyway). Interesting, since i've spent my fair share of time living in 0.0 and killed manny faction spawns, so should my sec status not be higher than 5.00? altho i've never encounterd any officer spawns I have to say i'm not liking these mutually exclusive/opposing ranks as getting to the top of 1 means being placed at or near the bottom of the other. Thats not so bad at the moment, but when the #n of players registered on eb reaches into the 1000s or even 10,000s, thats gonna be a whopping heavy anchor dragging down your global average. á
Caiman Graystock Caldari Comrades in Construction	Posted - 2009.10.15 16:29:00 - [112] Indeed^ Do they cancel each other out in terms of ranking, the 'highest sec status/lowest sec status' positioning? Originally by: CCP Whisper So you're going to have to do some actual thinking... Boo hoo. Cry some more.
dosperado Denial of Service	Posted - 2009.10.15 16:42:00 - [113] Edited by: dosperado on 15/10/2009 16:44:05 To keep the security status rankings clean and logical: Highest Security Status rankings should go from +0.01 to +10.00 Lowest Security Status rankings should go from -0.01 to -10.00 Characters with 0.00 Security Status shouldn't be listed at all, this will keep the list much shorter and clearer. ____________________ Security Status 9.0

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.10.15 16:53:00 - [114] @Amateratsu - bug fixed. As for SS, I know that in the old days you could go 5+, nowdays - I dunno really. And I will see what I can do about limiting the +/- side of it, question is, do a 0.00 ranked pilot even get listed, if so on the + or - side of it all? Problem I can see of that, is that someone with 0.01 in status would get ranked in +, howeever he/she would receive a "no data"-hit for not being listed on the - side (since "no data" ranks gets punished, altho in this case everyone would get punished in either category, unless 0.00 depending how I treat that value). Points are calculated with (Rank value in each category/number of ranks) [at writing X/47], if a pilot is NOT listed (no data) in a category he/she is punished with a value equal the number of active pilots in the db (eg 786 active pilots, the value will be 786 ensuring that a pilot will never get a lower score than the number of pilots [eb] tracks). So really the "points" is highly dynamic and really doesn't say much, hence why I left it out before - keep or go? Win a Cap Recharger II BPO for 10M ISK

Viggen Caldari The Lunatic Asylum Notorious Organization of Brothers	Posted - 2009.10.15 19:07:00 - [115] Originally by: Chribba So really the "points" is highly dynamic and really doesn't say much, hence why I left it out before - keep or go? Thanks for explaining. I say keep the points displayed, they add another visual aid to the rankings. Even though the points can change fast, I like the additional numbers and statistics. But we'll see what others think about it. If its a keeper then maybe add the formula to the page so people can understand how they are ranked where they are?
RaTTuS BIG Libertas Fidelitas	Posted - 2009.10.16 10:50:00 - [116] I got #2 -- 3 Titans Lottery EB \| Capital

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.10.16 11:47:00 - [117] Originally by: RaTTuS I got #2 I wondered how that happened... I updated the rankings and you got there... odd haha Ranks are cached for 10 min now, so if the ranks don't update instantly, wait 10 min and check again. Win a Cap Recharger II BPO for 10M ISK

Viggen Caldari The Lunatic Asylum Notorious Organization of Brothers	Posted - 2009.10.16 14:37:00 - [118] Originally by: RaTTuS I got #2 Yeah I went from being ranked around 25 ish up to rank 13 in a day. Not sure how as my stats havent changed, not that I'm complaining mind you
RaTTuS BIG Libertas Fidelitas	Posted - 2009.10.16 14:39:00 - [119] what would be awesome , if you could select 2 pilots and then see where the differences are ... sort of side by side comparison -- 3 Titans Lottery EB \| Capital

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.10.16 14:59:00 - [120] Originally by: RaTTuS what would be awesome , if you could select 2 pilots and then see where the differences are ... sort of side by side comparison Already on the todo list. Win a Cap Recharger II BPO for 10M ISK


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 31 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.