Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Welcome to Eve.
"EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler
Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game.
"All of it occured in the same framework of unrestricted player movement and limitless player choice in a single, shared game universe. As our senior producer put it 'f*cking brilliant'." --CCP Explorer in reference to Burn Jita
You are never really soloing, and you are really always PVPing. Whether you acknowledge this, and how well you do this is your only choice while playing eve. You have never sold a mod to an NPC. Every mineral you mine lowers the value of EVERY other player's minerals. Every rat you pop lowers the isk value of every other players isk. Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make. This is PVP. Player versus Player. This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. They have the right to stop you. If your ship so happens to be in space it is a valid target, no matter what type of ship it is, what part of the cluster it resides, what mods it has fitted, no matter what you think.
Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying the true spirit of the game. Some of which include:
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Adapt or Die.
Harden the **** up. (HTFU)
Go back to world of warcraft (GB2WoW)
If you are having problems with the playstyle of others, it must be suggested that you refer to the above in order. After exhausting the first three, you may feel like this:
EVE is hard.
At this point of desperation, you may still be tempted to post on the forums about why you're leaving, at which point you will be showered with this well known question:
Can I have your stuff?
Nobody cares that you're leaving because you can't fend for yourself. Sure the Devs may attempt balance things here and there, such as making certain things even harder, but your hand will not be held. They are not being paid to babysit. They are being paid to share their dream with us. That dream includes the pain of significant loss. Many players have had a problem with other players. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. The difference between the wheat and the chaff is: they do something about it. They don't whine.
When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week.
When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today.
So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please. |

Syndrea Caedrion
State War Academy Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
That goes both ways. |

Peta Michalek
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
In before 11 pages of same **** all over again. |

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Quote: You have never sold a mod to an NPC.
Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make.
This is PVP. Player versus Player.
I will never look at the Auction House in WoW the same way again. |

killorbekilled TBE
Dare Bears
94
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
good read huh? |

Stalafur
State War Academy Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yeah, got my hulk nearly blown up. Stashed it and pulled out my drake and searched for that m----f-----  Gotta have a fighting ship in reserve incase  |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. I guess you're right. The forums are PVP as well.  |

Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
55
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Amen! |

Stalafur
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
Miners can mine, but you gotta have a backup incase if the 'hood' tries to mess with you, atleast you got a handgun. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1005
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
Qolde wrote:This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. Ah, that's an awesome line. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
|

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
1081
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 05:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
You like to-may-toes and I like to-mah-toes. Let's call the whole thing off!
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
163
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 09:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Good read. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum Still Censored
647
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 09:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Honestly something in Eve needs to happen to stop all this **** posting about ganking. Is Eve really that dead that this is all people have to talk about?
PS. I don't really mean this thread per say but in general. |

Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
189
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 10:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Good enough read OP. Of course 9 years later (7 for me) the jaded vet doesn't have your rose colored glasses. The only game I have rose colored glasses for really is SWG and I don't have to worry about anyone forcing me to take those off anymore. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cg-_HeVNYOk
Save Derpy! |

TigerXtrm
Cadre Assault Force Initiative Mercenaries
38
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 10:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways.
PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion.
Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? |

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
650
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
367
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve.
"EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler
Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game.
"All of it occured in the same framework of unrestricted player movement and limitless player choice in a single, shared game universe. As our senior producer put it 'f*cking brilliant'." --CCP Explorer in reference to Burn Jita
You are never really soloing, and you are really always PVPing. Whether you acknowledge this, and how well you do this is your only choice while playing eve. You have never sold a mod to an NPC. Every mineral you mine lowers the value of EVERY other player's minerals. Every rat you pop lowers the isk value of every other players isk. Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make. This is PVP. Player versus Player. This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. They have the right to stop you. If your ship so happens to be in space it is a valid target, no matter what type of ship it is, what part of the cluster it resides, what mods it has fitted, no matter what you think.
Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying the true spirit of the game. Some of which include:
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Adapt or Die.
Harden the **** up. (HTFU)
Go back to world of warcraft (GB2WoW)
If you are having problems with the playstyle of others, it must be suggested that you refer to the above in order. After exhausting the first three, you may feel like this:
EVE is hard.
At this point of desperation, you may still be tempted to post on the forums about why you're leaving, at which point you will be showered with this well known question:
Can I have your stuff?
Nobody cares that you're leaving because you can't fend for yourself. Sure the Devs may attempt balance things here and there, such as making certain things even harder, but your hand will not be held. They are not being paid to babysit. They are being paid to share their dream with us. That dream includes the pain of significant loss. Many players have had a problem with other players. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. The difference between the wheat and the chaff is: they do something about it. They don't whine.
When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week.
When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today.
So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please.
If ypu want ppl to stop posting their whines will you stop posting yours ?
Tal
|

Gawain Edmond
Selective Hearing Nearly Feared
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:06:00 -
[18] - Quote
the problem is the miners didn't want to be made exploded they just want to make the stuff so other people can be made to be exploded what would be nice for the miners is if they were invincible!!
yea not gonna happen i don't make miners die it's mean in the same way that taking candy from babies is mean sure you can do it and you get the candy (and some angry parent givin you a slap) but it's fun while you get the candy |

Xhaiden Ora
University of Caille Gallente Federation
65
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:07:00 -
[19] - Quote
Oh good, more alpha male posturing on The Real EVE(tm). Just what we needed!
No one has a problem with the sandbox itself. It's more when other people **** in the sandbox that there's a problem. |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:41:00 -
[20] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. I guess you're right. The forums are PVP as well. 
OOOOoommmmm... OOOOoooommmm.... I am PVP'ing you with my brain!
vr East IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |
|

Tenchi Sal
Dust Bunnies 514
91
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
op sounds like hes whining about other players in a sandbox |

I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
139
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
Eve is a Sandbox, meaning people can do what the hell they want. That's why I laugh when people say someone is playing the game wrong. Or it's even funnier when people want to change the way how others play the game, especially when they themselves are saying Eve is a sandbox.  ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o ) ( o Y o )
The world would be a better place if boobies ran the world instead of boobs. |

Easthir Ravin
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
30
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Oh good, more alpha male posturing on The Real EVE(tm). Just what we needed!
No one has a problem with the sandbox itself. It's more when other people **** in the sandbox that there's a problem.
Greetings
You are correct, no one likes a floater in the sandbox. Unfortunately there will always be people who poop in the sand, but the great thing about it is you can find that person and throw his/her poop right back at them. It seems to me that people forget this about EVE. If someone poops on you, you are not forbidden by any rule or game mechanic to hunt that rat bastard down and make his corner of the sand stink for awhile.
vr East IN THE IMORTAL WORDS OF SOCRATES: -á" I drank WHAT?!" |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
582
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
Eve is not a sandbox.
It's a Universe.
The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
136
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 11:58:00 -
[25] - Quote
Quote:Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying what they think is the true spirit of the game. Here, fixed it. |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Quote:Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying what they think is the true spirit of the game. Here, fixed it. Including the Devs: Permaband - HTFU
Also watch any of the fanfest videos. The devs get hard-ons when talking about PVP. It was even rumored that some of the original devs were griefers in Ultima Online. It's not what we think is the true spirit. It has been stated by the devs themselves. People used to whine about gate camping as much as suicide ganking and how unfair it feels. People were complaining about how it compares to spawn killing in other games. ****, I used to be one of them. But that was when I was more of a n00b than I am now. Most gate camps ain't **** these days. Did they nerf gate camping? A little. Did they add interdiction nullifiers? Yep. Balance. Now, that some of the lesser adaptable people won't use one of the many tools already in place to protect themselves during forevergeddon, or just traveling through the heaviest trafficked pipelines in the most crowded areas of the coldest harshest universe with the most valuable items, and have the audacity to call the rest of the EVE playerbase mean names*, and attempt to change our game is appalling.
It is the people of this unadaptable, unintelligent breed that are the sh*t in the sandbox. Not us players.
*The bad man touched me in my no-no spot.
|

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here?
I just think it's a sad waste to see people being afraid to even attempt to leave the newbie area. Mining is a necessary part of the game. I have mined quite a bit, but have hauled more for mining ops. Ain't nothing wrong with it. What's wrong, is expecting to not get blown up every once in a while. In highsec, you have a reasonable expectation to not get blown up so often, but enough of the playerbase has decided not so with T2 mining barges anymore. Mining in null used to be the shiznit, til people started afking their hulks in hisec so much. I guess people are shaping that sand how they want. Now, if you want to afk mine in Hisec, you have to use covetors or battleships. If you want to use your hulks, you have to go to WH or 0.0. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1219
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:46:00 -
[28] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve.
You have never sold a mod to an NPC.
I have sold freighters full of commodities to NPCs...
Lol no. EvE is hard-core, which does not mean necessarily it's hard. Hard core imposes restrictions and generally obstacles on the player progress, which is something EvE abounds with.
Hard = you can win if you are really really good else you'll lose. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
309
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
What an idiotic OP.
There is no sandbox. There is a single shard game with persistence, but this myth that there is a sandbox is totally nonsense.
What is the sandbox?
Can anyone define what the sandbox is?
Sandbox has become the catchall phrase for explaining why X's playstyle is superior to Y's. Or why Y should go back to WoW or some other game.
It's just more drivel and nonsense.
Eve is not a sandbox any more than any other MMO is a sandbox.
/rant Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
97
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve.
"EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler
Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game.
"All of it occured in the same framework of unrestricted player movement and limitless player choice in a single, shared game universe. As our senior producer put it 'f*cking brilliant'." --CCP Explorer in reference to Burn Jita
You are never really soloing, and you are really always PVPing. Whether you acknowledge this, and how well you do this is your only choice while playing eve. You have never sold a mod to an NPC. Every mineral you mine lowers the value of EVERY other player's minerals. Every rat you pop lowers the isk value of every other players isk. Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make. This is PVP. Player versus Player. This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. They have the right to stop you. If your ship so happens to be in space it is a valid target, no matter what type of ship it is, what part of the cluster it resides, what mods it has fitted, no matter what you think.
Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying the true spirit of the game. Some of which include:
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Adapt or Die.
Harden the **** up. (HTFU)
Go back to world of warcraft (GB2WoW)
If you are having problems with the playstyle of others, it must be suggested that you refer to the above in order. After exhausting the first three, you may feel like this:
EVE is hard.
At this point of desperation, you may still be tempted to post on the forums about why you're leaving, at which point you will be showered with this well known question:
Can I have your stuff?
Nobody cares that you're leaving because you can't fend for yourself. Sure the Devs may attempt balance things here and there, such as making certain things even harder, but your hand will not be held. They are not being paid to babysit. They are being paid to share their dream with us. That dream includes the pain of significant loss. Many players have had a problem with other players. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. The difference between the wheat and the chaff is: they do something about it. They don't whine.
When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week.
When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today.
So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please.
Where is the "add a bazzilion likes" button. This post would get my vote :) .
"Everyone Vs Everyone", perfect, eve is an acronym.
I don't hate the high sec people, the carebears, the people who don't like to shoot people. Just like the EVE economy needs people like me who like to blow up other people, we need miners, builders, traders, ect ect.
I do dislike the people who (just like in real life) come in to a perfectly functional (if not perfect) environment and would rather bend that environment to their warped and unrealistic wants/needs without a moment of thought about how badly that would suck for other people or the environment itself.
I'm talking about the people complaining about suicide ganking (which is a why for people producing things in the game to experiance some risk and loss and is thus good for the game) or any kind of pvp in high sec (yep., their are people who want violence free zones in eve. I'm all for it, as long as you couldn't kake isk, mine, mission or anything else but sight see in those zones : ) .
The EVE community is a microcosm of real life of course. Even eve, a harsh cold pvp game is infested with people who just downright dislike the ideas of the game but who refuse to move out/on to someplace else that does cater to what they like (cough Star Trek Online cough).
I know I'm ranting, but honestly, These high sec/risk averse/"change the game to suit me because it's the games fault, it can't be that I suck" types so much remind me of the "Newtonian physics NOW" people I used to play with in X-wing. Good God, if you want newtonian physics, go outside and jump off a cliff and leave thestar wars game to star wars fans. (Even thinking of those days makes me want to shoot something lol : ) ).
Ok, rant over, good post OP.
|
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1219
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so.
Balls. There are thousands of miners and maybe 20 posted about changing the game. If you call this a good portion... Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
97
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:What an idiotic OP.
There is no sandbox. There is a single shard game with persistence, but this myth that there is a sandbox is totally nonsense.
What is the sandbox?
Can anyone define what the sandbox is?
Sandbox has become the catchall phrase for explaining why X's playstyle is superior to Y's. Or why Y should go back to WoW or some other game.
It's just more drivel and nonsense.
Eve is not a sandbox any more than any other MMO is a sandbox.
/rant
What an idiotic rant.
I do so hate the Arghhh Playstyle BS.. It's just a dodge, from people who can't accept that other people's "playstyle" invovles them dying.
I hear that panty-waist miiners saying, "oh, mining in a hulk in high sec is my play style" Well, suicide ganking miners is Goon's play style. Both allowed by the game = both equally valid game play. Get over it.
|

Makkal Hanaya
Drakenburg
69
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 17:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
Easthir Ravin wrote:
Greetings
You are correct, no one likes a floater in the sandbox. Unfortunately there will always be people who poop in the sand, but the great thing about it is you can find that person and throw his/her poop right back at them.
I wouldn't refer to picking up another person's ***** and tossing at them as 'great.' although my eyes were open they might have just as well've been closed
|

Betrinna Cantis
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 18:15:00 -
[34] - Quote
There are "safe zones" in EVE... They are called Stations  |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
19
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 22:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve.
You have never sold a mod to an NPC. I have sold freighters full of commodities to NPCs... Lol no. EvE is hard-core, which does not mean necessarily it's hard. Hard core imposes restrictions and generally obstacles on the player progress, which is something EvE abounds with. Hard = you can win if you are really really good else you'll lose. It's both hard and hardcore. I have many friends in other games who quit because Eve is hard. Some quit because they hate waiting for skills to train, but lol **** those microwave kids.
Commodites =/= mods. Hence why I said mod, instead of item. There was once a day when you could sell mins to NPC's as well. Also, if someone wanted to be a ****, they could suicide your freighter. Even though you're using NPC's, other people are playing the commodities game as well, and what you do affects them, and vice versa. |

Johnson Johnson
Heretic University Heretic Nation
18
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 22:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
but if nobody posted their opinions, when would you get an opportunity to wave your little maggot around on the forums? |

Yannick Avada
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 22:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Easthir Ravin wrote:
OOOOoommmmm... OOOOoooommmm.... I am PVP'ing you with my brain!
vr East
So tinfoil hats would count as hardening then? |

Syndrea Caedrion
State War Academy Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 23:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so.
And getting absolutely nowhere for all their efforts. After all, emoraging on the forums can hardly constitute convincing CCP to make mining safer. I haven't heard of any trips to Iceland being made by miners in order to plead their case before some Dev council either. It's a chicken little fallacy really, just on the opposite end of the spectrum from "PvPers are ruining Eve".
Don't get me wrong, I support the ability to gank people in hisec. I like that I don't feel all that safe when I am there, and that's a good thing. But the Permageddon is just another step in the addiction process, and does nothing for the game in the long run. It certainly doesn't convince miners why they need random ganks to occur now and then and why it's good for the game. It convinces them that those who are using the mechanics are nothing short of internet bullies. But like it or not, each side needs the other for the game to be truly healthy. The only ones who do not recognize that fact are the ones who are more concerned with their own needs or wants over the needs of the game as a whole. They somehow managed to get every freak and creep in the universe in this one game, and then somehow managed to let them take it over, and then they somehow managed to stick us right smack in the middle. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
74
|
Posted - 2012.06.08 23:41:00 -
[39] - Quote
Qolde wrote:I just think it's a sad waste to see people being afraid to even attempt to leave the newbie area. Mining is a necessary part of the game. I have mined quite a bit, but have hauled more for mining ops. Ain't nothing wrong with it. What's wrong, is expecting to not get blown up every once in a while. In highsec, you have a reasonable expectation to not get blown up so often, but enough of the playerbase has decided not so with T2 mining barges anymore. Mining in null used to be the shiznit, til people started afking their hulks in hisec so much. I guess people are shaping that sand how they want. Now, if you want to afk mine in Hisec, you have to use covetors or battleships. 
So, why you try to change the way ultimate carebear like me plays EVE? |

Chokichi Ozuwara
Royal One Piece Corporation Deadly Unknown
311
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 00:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:What an idiotic rant. Why was it idiotic?
Can you tell me what the sandbox is?
Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |
|

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
650
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 00:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Destiny Corrupted wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so. Balls. There are thousands of miners and maybe 20 posted about changing the game. If you call this a good portion... There are thousands of pvpers, and maybe 20 posted about not changing the game. It's all about proper data analysis.
Still, if we go and gank 50 miners, and afterwards provide each one with a link to a GD forum thread about whether or not we need pvp flags, how do you think the majority of them would respond? (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7787
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 00:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
This one is better. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Cutter Isaacson
Peace N Quiet
410
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 01:48:00 -
[43] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so.
Can you please point me to this massively long list of miners that are actively petitioning CCP to alter the fundamentals of EVE? Or is this statement merely the same bollocks that so many others keep spewing out?
So far all I have seen are at most, a dozen miners who are whining, while the majority of the whining is coming from longer term "hardcore" PvP pilots. Strange, don't you think? Numbers of terminally stupid people seem to be on the increase, I suggest we have a real life Stupidageddon to rectify this issue. |

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
221
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 02:04:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Qolde wrote:I just think it's a sad waste to see people being afraid to even attempt to leave the newbie area. Mining is a necessary part of the game. I have mined quite a bit, but have hauled more for mining ops. Ain't nothing wrong with it. What's wrong, is expecting to not get blown up every once in a while. In highsec, you have a reasonable expectation to not get blown up so often, but enough of the playerbase has decided not so with T2 mining barges anymore. Mining in null used to be the shiznit, til people started afking their hulks in hisec so much. I guess people are shaping that sand how they want. Now, if you want to afk mine in Hisec, you have to use covetors or battleships.  So, why you try to change the way ultimate carebear like me plays EVE? Far be it from me or anyone else to tell you to stop letting us blow up your ships. |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
345
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 02:52:00 -
[45] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve.
"EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler
Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game.
"All of it occured in the same framework of unrestricted player movement and limitless player choice in a single, shared game universe. As our senior producer put it 'f*cking brilliant'." --CCP Explorer in reference to Burn Jita
You are never really soloing, and you are really always PVPing. Whether you acknowledge this, and how well you do this is your only choice while playing eve. You have never sold a mod to an NPC. Every mineral you mine lowers the value of EVERY other player's minerals. Every rat you pop lowers the isk value of every other players isk. Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make. This is PVP. Player versus Player. This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. They have the right to stop you. If your ship so happens to be in space it is a valid target, no matter what type of ship it is, what part of the cluster it resides, what mods it has fitted, no matter what you think.
Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying the true spirit of the game. Some of which include:
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Adapt or Die.
Harden the **** up. (HTFU)
Go back to world of warcraft (GB2WoW)
If you are having problems with the playstyle of others, it must be suggested that you refer to the above in order. After exhausting the first three, you may feel like this:
EVE is hard.
At this point of desperation, you may still be tempted to post on the forums about why you're leaving, at which point you will be showered with this well known question:
Can I have your stuff?
Nobody cares that you're leaving because you can't fend for yourself. Sure the Devs may attempt balance things here and there, such as making certain things even harder, but your hand will not be held. They are not being paid to babysit. They are being paid to share their dream with us. That dream includes the pain of significant loss. Many players have had a problem with other players. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. The difference between the wheat and the chaff is: they do something about it. They don't whine.
When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week.
When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today.
So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please.
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
332
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 02:59:00 -
[46] - Quote
Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 03:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
David Cedarbridge wrote:Far be it from me or anyone else to tell you to stop letting us blow up your ships.
Just tell me when and I undock my Rokh and warp to nearby asteroid belt. |

Chief Bob
Swine Capitalism
3
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 03:16:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Quote:Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying what they think is the true spirit of the game. Here, fixed it.
^^^ this
I've noticed a lot of people confusing their opinions for fact |

Torneach
Viziam Amarr Empire
217
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 03:34:00 -
[49] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:TigerXtrm wrote:Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways. PVP'ers apparently don't grasp this notion. Miners are free to mine. PVP'ers are free to blow them up. Where lies the problem here? Mostly in the fact that a good portion (not all) of the miners are trying very hard to convince CCP to make game changes that would prevent the pvpers from doing so.
Doesn't really matter if 'most' (and I doubt this is the case) are trying to convince CCP to make those drastic changes. Do you really think they'll succeed? CCP has done stupid things in the past, but they aren't that dumb. Waging a crusade because of what 'most' miners 'may demand' from CCP is ridiculous.
Tell us the real reason: you like it. nothing wrong with that, but don't hide behind a righteous cause, seriously. |

R0me0 Charl1e
Easy A Industries
31
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 07:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
That pretty much sums up GD. |
|

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
387
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 08:44:00 -
[51] - Quote
Funny
Tal
|

Bossy Lady
Aliastra Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 08:49:00 -
[52] - Quote
Syndrea Caedrion wrote:That goes both ways.
EVE isn't hard only when your opponents go out of their way to make it as easy as possible
Posting on this character because apparently some people get upset when they're asked difficult questions. M. |

Bossy Lady
Aliastra Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 08:49:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves.
List the non PvP parts of EVE please.
Posting on this character because apparently some people get upset when they're asked difficult questions. M. |

Degren
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1384
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 09:06:00 -
[54] - Quote
Bossy Lady wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. List the non PvP parts of EVE please.
Unsubscribing. You don't know. |||| Space News |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
25
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 17:24:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote: EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody.
I didn't make that up. Someone else imagined it first. Post number 13. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:55:00 -
[56] - Quote
Welp, I'm stealing it for my sig nonetheless. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 18:57:00 -
[57] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Qolde wrote:I just think it's a sad waste to see people being afraid to even attempt to leave the newbie area. Mining is a necessary part of the game. I have mined quite a bit, but have hauled more for mining ops. Ain't nothing wrong with it. What's wrong, is expecting to not get blown up every once in a while. In highsec, you have a reasonable expectation to not get blown up so often, but enough of the playerbase has decided not so with T2 mining barges anymore. Mining in null used to be the shiznit, til people started afking their hulks in hisec so much. I guess people are shaping that sand how they want. Now, if you want to afk mine in Hisec, you have to use covetors or battleships.  So, why you try to change the way ultimate carebear like me plays EVE?
'Cause we feel like it. You can choose to let us change the way you play or not. How you react to other player's influence is entirely up to you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Yuda Mann
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Here's the actual quote. I have it saved since people can't keep quotes straight around here.
http://eve-search.com/thread/528360/page/1#29 EVE is a dark and harsh world, you're supposed to feel a bit worried and slightly angry when you log in, you're not supposed to feel like you're logging in to a happy, happy, fluffy, fluffy lala land filled with fun and adventures, that's what hello kitty online is for. -CCP Wrangler, 2007.05.29
Also:
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=1293 I'm also against the lack of danger and the awful boring times when you are just chugging along and nothing threatens you. -CCP Oveur, 2004.07.01
|

Zhihatsu
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
66
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:37:00 -
[59] - Quote
Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves.
Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp. People without faces have no mouths with which to speak. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1833
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:39:00 -
[60] - Quote
Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp.
That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |
|

adam smash
University of Caille Gallente Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:42:00 -
[61] - Quote
So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
106
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:45:00 -
[62] - Quote
adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back. Let's see.
CCP puts this in-game, all the high-sec risk-averse filth take advantage of this "service" and begin making stupid amounts of risk-free ISK.
These players have ever-further bloated wallets and begin RMT'ing away their winnings because they make so much ISK they don't need to spend all of it on PLEX anymore. They also never lose a ship again, because they can rent security from CONCORD risk-free. PVPers also lose less ships, somewhat lowering the demand for high-sec's one valued commodity: Tritanium.
RMT goes through the roof. People actually playing the risky part of the game can no longer get ahead, even with Technetium. Nobody needs Tech anymore because Hulks aren't popping left and right.
Subs plummet.
EVE becomes a miner wasteland of filthy RMTers who have nobody left to buy their wares.
Your idea is brilliant. Send Hilmar a tweet, this **** is going viral! |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 19:57:00 -
[63] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:'Cause we feel like it. You can choose to let us change the way you play or not. How you react to other player's influence is entirely up to you.
Just tell me when and I undock my Rokh and warp to nearby asteroid belt. |

Singoth
Kronos Fleet
64
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:12:00 -
[64] - Quote
My own contribution to this thread:
This is EVE. A hardcore game. While ganking defenceless mining barges is not really "hardcore" IMO, I can see and understand why it's done. But the moment when the carebears "Harden The Fack Up" and strike back with an overwhelming power, they lose their carebear title and then rightly earn their spot in this game.
But alas, most of these carebears just don't *want* to PvP, even despise the very act of it. This is a foolish opinion to have, as PvP is the very core of EVE. You shouldn't be wanting to limit it, or even remove it. But some carebears do think this, and then ask CCP to take measures to make sure the carebears can continue living in their own little world with unicorns that puke rainbows. But they don't realise this is a multiplayer game. With the emphasis on MULTIPLAYER. That means other players can stroll through your happy little world and burn down everything you ever worked for. You KNEW this when you started playing, you KNEW there was a risk of dying the moment you undocked. You took that risk. If you die, that's not because of bad game mechanics/design, that's not because other players are mean. It is because you probably didn't even try to minimise the risk. I know ways to avoid suicide gankers in highsec that simply can not fail. Heck, you can keep your MLU2s and survey scanner and not even tank your hulk... but it requires teamwork, preparation, and ISK. YES, ISK for your protection, a small price to pay for your life. There are plenty of ways to protect yourself... so my greatest question is: why do people not utilize the game mechanics that allow them to live through a LOT of suicide ganks? Why? Is it too much effort? Too inconvenient? You sound like a lazy person that is unwilling to adapt to new changes. And at that point, evolution kicks in: only the strongest, smartest, and most resilient will survive. Right now, 'carebears' immediately raise the white flag and hope some kind of deity (CCP) will save their arses. It's silly.
As a 'carebear', you create inflation, you steal the profits of nullsec alliances, you dominate the market. And you expect that other players, especially those who you steal the profits from, just accept this without acting on it? Then please, just go play some kind of singleplayer game, because EVE is not for you.
If you really think you deserve to live a risk-free life in EVE, then work for it, don't go asking for a change in the game because you are incompetent at playing it. Less yappin', more zappin'! |

adam smash
University of Caille Gallente Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:50:00 -
[65] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back. Let's see. CCP puts this in-game, all the high-sec risk-averse filth take advantage of this "service" and begin making stupid amounts of risk-free ISK. These players have ever-further bloated wallets and begin RMT'ing away their winnings because they make so much ISK they don't need to spend all of it on PLEX anymore. They also never lose a ship again, because they can rent security from CONCORD risk-free. PVPers also lose less ships, somewhat lowering the demand for high-sec's one valued commodity: Tritanium. RMT goes through the roof. People actually playing the risky part of the game can no longer get ahead, even with Technetium. Nobody needs Tech anymore because Hulks aren't popping left and right. Subs plummet. EVE becomes a miner wasteland of filthy RMTers who have nobody left to buy their wares. Your idea is brilliant. Send Hilmar a tweet, this **** is going viral!
Because most of the people banned were in HS right? They were not null RMTs... some PL member -80 billion isk wallet no.
All I read here are TEARS...
Some tech whine... good point it is a tech nerf... + 1 reason to do it... (also rere, hulks are not the only ship that needs tech)
RMT is not going to go up as said... RMT lol... was a null thing mostly...
Please tell me the RISK of mining in null... the biggest risk is the op is so large it is harder to see a hostile come into local... ROFL.
Also how can eve become a wasteland of RMTers?
With only RMT miners... first off the price if mins will go epicly low, second who is going to build stuff for the RMTers to buy? Who is going to find the deadspace and officer mods? The whole RMT thing would not even work...
Go learn something ROFL.
O btw... WAR DEC THEM... o ****... can't pay for wardec protection. But ya a wardec means REALLY danager... effort, COST... |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
112
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
adam smash wrote:Disregard That wrote:adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back. Let's see. CCP puts this in-game, all the high-sec risk-averse filth take advantage of this "service" and begin making stupid amounts of risk-free ISK. These players have ever-further bloated wallets and begin RMT'ing away their winnings because they make so much ISK they don't need to spend all of it on PLEX anymore. They also never lose a ship again, because they can rent security from CONCORD risk-free. PVPers also lose less ships, somewhat lowering the demand for high-sec's one valued commodity: Tritanium. RMT goes through the roof. People actually playing the risky part of the game can no longer get ahead, even with Technetium. Nobody needs Tech anymore because Hulks aren't popping left and right. Subs plummet. EVE becomes a miner wasteland of filthy RMTers who have nobody left to buy their wares. Your idea is brilliant. Send Hilmar a tweet, this **** is going viral! Because most of the people banned were in HS right? They were not null RMTs... some PL member -80 billion isk wallet no. All I read here are TEARS... Some tech whine... good point it is a tech nerf... + 1 reason to do it... (also rere, hulks are not the only ship that needs tech) RMT is not going to go up as said... RMT lol... was a null thing mostly... Please tell me the RISK of mining in null... the biggest risk is the op is so large it is harder to see a hostile come into local... ROFL. Also how can eve become a wasteland of RMTers? With only RMT miners... first off the price if mins will go epicly low, second who is going to build stuff for the RMTers to buy? Who is going to find the deadspace and officer mods? The whole RMT thing would not even work... Go learn something ROFL. O btw... WAR DEC THEM... o ****... can't pay for wardec protection. But ya a wardec means REALLY danager... effort, COST... Actually, at fanfest they said that the majority of RMT botters are, in fact, in high-sec.
Congratulations on a great post, I didn't read the rest.
False premises, et al.
EDIT: Caldari High-sec, to be specific. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
736
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:53:00 -
[67] - Quote
Good post. The people whining today about how hard Eve is and should be tamed wont ever believe that by comparison it is now far far easier than even when I started just 5 years ago. Further back it was harder still. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

adam smash
University of Caille Gallente Federation
99
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 20:57:00 -
[68] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:adam smash wrote:Disregard That wrote:adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back. Let's see. CCP puts this in-game, all the high-sec risk-averse filth take advantage of this "service" and begin making stupid amounts of risk-free ISK. These players have ever-further bloated wallets and begin RMT'ing away their winnings because they make so much ISK they don't need to spend all of it on PLEX anymore. They also never lose a ship again, because they can rent security from CONCORD risk-free. PVPers also lose less ships, somewhat lowering the demand for high-sec's one valued commodity: Tritanium. RMT goes through the roof. People actually playing the risky part of the game can no longer get ahead, even with Technetium. Nobody needs Tech anymore because Hulks aren't popping left and right. Subs plummet. EVE becomes a miner wasteland of filthy RMTers who have nobody left to buy their wares. Your idea is brilliant. Send Hilmar a tweet, this **** is going viral! Because most of the people banned were in HS right? They were not null RMTs... some PL member -80 billion isk wallet no. All I read here are TEARS... Some tech whine... good point it is a tech nerf... + 1 reason to do it... (also rere, hulks are not the only ship that needs tech) RMT is not going to go up as said... RMT lol... was a null thing mostly... Please tell me the RISK of mining in null... the biggest risk is the op is so large it is harder to see a hostile come into local... ROFL. Also how can eve become a wasteland of RMTers? With only RMT miners... first off the price if mins will go epicly low, second who is going to build stuff for the RMTers to buy? Who is going to find the deadspace and officer mods? The whole RMT thing would not even work... Go learn something ROFL. O btw... WAR DEC THEM... o ****... can't pay for wardec protection. But ya a wardec means REALLY danager... effort, COST... Actually, at fanfest they said that the majority of RMT botters are, in fact, in high-sec. Congratulations on a great post, I didn't read the rest. False premises, et al. EDIT: Caldari High-sec, to be specific.
First off that is CAUGHT botters...
you gona tell me every bot was a main? lol please... don't read anything beacuse you are just wrong.
You need a MARKET dumb dumb who were the guys who BOUGHT the isk? null secers...
Let's go on with your everyone doing it for RMT... all that means is ganking = MORE bots / RMT chars needed... so all you are doing is helping turn even into a RMT waste land...
Ya you lose, lose again, and lose more. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
112
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 21:04:00 -
[69] - Quote
Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. |

EVE Roy Mustang
State War Academy Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 21:05:00 -
[70] - Quote
Also, CCP likes Goons more than they like carebears
|
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1838
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 22:38:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:RubyPorto wrote:'Cause we feel like it. You can choose to let us change the way you play or not. How you react to other player's influence is entirely up to you. Just tell me when and I undock my Rokh and warp to nearby asteroid belt.
So now you admit you like the suggestions I've made in EVERY SINGLE THREAD about this. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
32
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 22:53:00 -
[72] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp. That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1839
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 23:04:00 -
[73] - Quote
Qolde wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp. That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage.
RubyPorto lands a Wrecking Shot on Zhihatsu's Couch This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1841
|
Posted - 2012.06.09 23:59:00 -
[74] - Quote
adam smash wrote:So why can I not can flip noobs in the "sandbox"
O right because it is a sandbox WITH LIMITS....
So ccp can choose what to limit and what to not. I see no reason why HS ganking can not be limited. Here is an idea. Miner can pay concord a SMALL price to come into the belt and sit in it... ALL DAY... boom ganking prices go WAY up as you need WAY more ships.
All the sandbox bullshit needs to stop
You want PVP head over to world of tanks
**** shoots back.
I want PvP, I come to EvE. That's what the game's based on. See any NPCs in the mineral market? Then mining is PvP. See any NPCs in the LP item market? Then selling LP goods is PvP. See any NPCs caring about the buying power of ISK? Then running Isk faucets is PvP.
EvE's core (and only redeeming feature) is the fact that player vs player interaction permeates the game. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 00:13:00 -
[75] - Quote
Hulkageddon: Infinite Justice |

Zhihatsu
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
66
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 00:15:00 -
[76] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Qolde wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:Ban Bindy wrote:Ho hum. Another everything you do is PVP post. You guys have truly deluded yourselves. Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp. That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage. RubyPorto lands a Wrecking Shot on Zhihatsu's Couch
Is this a euphemism for something that I am missing here? People without faces have no mouths with which to speak. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1842
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 00:23:00 -
[77] - Quote
Zhihatsu wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Qolde wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:
Its true, not everything you do is PVP in eve. Sitting on your butt on your space couch really isn't pvp.
That indent in your couch is making my experience less pleasant when I come visit SoonGäó Zhihatsu's couch lightly scratches your butt for 69 points of damage. RubyPorto lands a Wrecking Shot on Zhihatsu's Couch Is this a euphemism for something that I am missing here?
Did you clicky the link? I think it's pretty explicit about what's being wrecked.
(It's the Couch) This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Archie Benedict
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 02:22:00 -
[78] - Quote
The OP should be a sticky |

Dakeen Kurvora
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 03:34:00 -
[79] - Quote
Xhaiden Ora wrote:Oh good, more alpha male posturing on The Real EVE(tm). Just what we needed!
No one has a problem with the sandbox itself. It's more when other people **** in the sandbox that there's a problem.
Ya... anything with a sandbox element people will #@%$ in it these days. From Minecraft to Eve. |

EpicFailTroll
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 03:36:00 -
[80] - Quote
EvE's only hard if you play with a single account. Get a scout, and the harshness totally disappears. You can roam freely, haul your loot, manufactured goods, or go -10, your alt can shop for you in empire, you can scam, do whatever, and get off scot-free.
This pseudo-harshness is actually an incentive to buy multiple accounts. It has created a faithful playerbase of high-sec, 0.0 and WH dwellers, who feel pride in striving despite this pseudo-harshness, and of online griefers. Most of all players, whatever their path, fund multiple accounts monthly, either through real money or PLEX, which are bought and sold by IRL rich players.
There are not many real players behind the keyboards. But this small playerbase pays a lot of RL money.
It works out nice. Because, at the moment, a single shard can only accommodate so many players. Yet, the day technology leaps forward and allows ten times more concurrent users, Tranquility gets Trammelized, to bring in the casual crowd.
And griefers will cry their griefbears tears "why did you do this ;_;" , unable to understand, once again, that each and every MMO that draws a clear line between pvp and pve areas or servers (that is, most of them), do so because of that tiny community of online griefers, who would require too many GM resources to properly cull, and who are better left as paying customers in certain designated areas.
TLDR: Should gamers all respect some form of common decency, there would be no need for hardcoded pvp restrictions, and complete sandboxes would be possible. If some players didn't go out of their way to seek pure grief from others (effectively not roleplaying in a game, but metagaming in a sociopathic quest for RL Schadenfreude), what need would there be for stupid mechanics like instagibbing CONCORD ?
The more griefing, the less sandbox |
|

Dakeen Kurvora
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 03:53:00 -
[81] - Quote
Oh here is a good one. Guy says mining is PVP. Another guy says miners don't want to PVP. Huh? OOOOOOOOOHHHHH they aren't interested in combat PVP got you...ya. So what? Joe miner wants to mine and build his modules and ships, great means I don't have to do it. You can not tell/force people how to play, they just quit. Look at latest total mined graphs in the dev blogs. Some of that missing ore is coming off of alts of course. The rest is people either unsubbing for now or just not logging in. Notice any increase in the amount coming from low/null/w space? Nope.
I've done the whole mining thing myself. I don't do it now only because my personal tastes have changed. Came back to the game recently and started this combat pilot instead of going back to my industrial. Mining had its dangers back then but now they have an bigger target on their head, I'd be pissed too. |

Baby ChuChu
Ice Cream Asylum
85
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:07:00 -
[82] - Quote
So we're still having this discussion?
Hell, these mythical whining carebears may be a plague to the game, but these very real internet tough guys are a plague to the forums. Call yourselves hardcore or whatever you want, but I've never such a repetitive group of people.
Don't get me wrong. I'm fully in support of what Eve 'is' or else I wouldn't be playing the damn game, but still. Why does this discussion pop up a million times everyday?
Who are you trying to convince? These mythical hordes of whining carebears? If they don't get it by now then they never will. CCP? If they don't meet your expectations then shut up, cancel your account, and move on. |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
27
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:19:00 -
[83] - Quote
No other MMO offers a single shard and a single economy driven by players where it is easily affordable in game or through real world transaction to an in-game currency (PLEX) to instantly kill a player's investment (also including time, money (subscriptions), effort, and long term investment)
The addition of the T3 BC created a gap not compensated for by by the industrial devs (if there are any left) to create ships that can counter effortless instagib.
Single shooting high value ships with a ship as affordable as a destroyer or a T3 BC while suffering no consequences (the laughable buddy system and a game where multiple simultaneous accounts is both accepted and encouraged with 3 characters given to each account) defeats the purpose of the sandbox.
A productive system would be one that transects characters and accounts leading to a penalty system that seriously punishes people and their accounts, new or old, related to the incident or not.
The essence of the sandbox is adaptation - if one kid (alliance) forces you to build your castle with wet sand, you and your buddies turn the tables and build your castle with sand and dirt, more stable. Eve does not allow this and the benefit is being given to the aggressors who work only game mechanics and care nothing for the spirit of the game. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:29:00 -
[84] - Quote
Nikodiemus wrote:No other MMO offers a single shard and a single economy driven by players where it is easily affordable in game or through real world transaction to an in-game currency (PLEX) to instantly kill a player's investment (also including time, money (subscriptions), effort, and long term investment)
The addition of the T3 BC created a gap not compensated for by by the industrial devs (if there are any left) to create ships that can counter effortless instagib.
Single shooting high value ships with a ship as affordable as a destroyer or a T3 BC while suffering no consequences (the laughable buddy system and a game where multiple simultaneous accounts is both accepted and encouraged with 3 characters given to each account) defeats the purpose of the sandbox.
The t3 BC gank of today costs more than the AlphaBS gank did before the t3 were introduced. The insurance nerf compensated for the introduction of the t3 BCs perfectly as far as ganking cost is concerned.
Destroyer Ganks do not single-shot anything. They beat them down with high DPS (again, at a higher cost than the pre-dessiebuff/insurancenerf thorax ganks). The fact that they do not single-shot their targets leaves them open to disruption via death or ECM jam (i.e. an AlphaNado of your own or ECM drones) if they're shooting down a tanked Hulk.
If you're going to claim that ganking has gotten too cheap, it helps to include all the game mechanical factors that affect the cost of ganking.
If you want to make your hulk less cheap to gank, it helps to fit a tank or take some measures to protect your expensive investment. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Uinuva Karma
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
43
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:42:00 -
[85] - Quote
Nikodiemus wrote: The essence of the sandbox is adaptation - if one kid (alliance) forces you to build your castle with wet sand, you and your buddies turn the tables and build your castle with sand and dirt, more stable. Eve does not allow this and the benefit is being given to the aggressors who work only game mechanics and care nothing for the spirit of the game.
Yes it does, castlebuilding happens outside the beginner systems. Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want.
This is the idea of EVE, the sandbox. Not clinging on to the starter area. Captain Kirk didn't stay in hisec.-á
|

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
37
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 04:52:00 -
[86] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing.
so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions.
Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 05:12:00 -
[87] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions. Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much
You're assuming we gank you because we don't like what you do. That assumption is faulty. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
37
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 05:23:00 -
[88] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Aramatheia wrote:Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions. Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much You're assuming we gank you because we don't like what you do. That assumption is faulty.
perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light" |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
38
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 05:56:00 -
[89] - Quote
Nikodiemus wrote:No other MMO offers a single shard and a single economy driven by players where it is easily affordable in game or through real world transaction to an in-game currency (PLEX) to instantly kill a player's investment (also including time, money (subscriptions), effort, and long term investment)
The addition of the T3 BC created a gap not compensated for by by the industrial devs (if there are any left) to create ships that can counter effortless instagib.
Single shooting high value ships with a ship as affordable as a destroyer or a T3 BC while suffering no consequences (the laughable buddy system and a game where multiple simultaneous accounts is both accepted and encouraged with 3 characters given to each account) defeats the purpose of the sandbox.
A productive system would be one that transects characters and accounts leading to a penalty system that seriously punishes people and their accounts, new or old, related to the incident or not.
The essence of the sandbox is adaptation - if one kid (alliance) forces you to build your castle with wet sand, you and your buddies turn the tables and build your castle with sand and dirt, more stable. Eve does not allow this and the benefit is being given to the aggressors who work only game mechanics and care nothing for the spirit of the game. Exactly. No other game offers us the chance to prove what we can do in comparison to EVERYONE else who plays this game. Theres no best on this server. There is only the best. And what defines the BEST? Well that depends on what you are trying to do. I have seen enough POSTERS, who are rarer than you'd believe, to see that there are many hulks survivng hulkageddon. There are many mission runners who have never been ganked. There's even a person who's never been podded. WTF?!
The only people who complain about the game on the forums are the ones who can't play it. n00bs. Let me show you when I was a n00b.
the beginning 1 2 lolfunfactorwhileratting |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1844
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 06:00:00 -
[90] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote: perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light"
They could be kidding or RPing. Or they could be serious, what do I care?
Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe.
I am not saying all of this applies to you, personally. But it does apply to most of the people who are writing threads whinging about getting ganked.
As for respect, if you don't like shooting exhumers, that's totally fine. But you have to admit that ganking exhumers is also totally fine and is at the very least, more effort than AFK mining is. Whether you respect the gankers for their specialized skills (it does take some skill to pull off successful, cost effective ganks) or not is entirely up to you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |
|

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
38
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 06:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Nikodiemus wrote:No other MMO offers a single shard and a single economy driven by players where it is easily affordable in game or through real world transaction to an in-game currency (PLEX) to instantly kill a player's investment (also including time, money (subscriptions), effort, and long term investment)
The addition of the T3 BC created a gap not compensated for by by the industrial devs (if there are any left) to create ships that can counter effortless instagib.
Single shooting high value ships with a ship as affordable as a destroyer or a T3 BC while suffering no consequences (the laughable buddy system and a game where multiple simultaneous accounts is both accepted and encouraged with 3 characters given to each account) defeats the purpose of the sandbox.
A productive system would be one that transects characters and accounts leading to a penalty system that seriously punishes people and their accounts, new or old, related to the incident or not.
The essence of the sandbox is adaptation - if one kid (alliance) forces you to build your castle with wet sand, you and your buddies turn the tables and build your castle with sand and dirt, more stable. Eve does not allow this and the benefit is being given to the aggressors who work only game mechanics and care nothing for the spirit of the game. Exactly. No other game offers us the chance to prove what we can do in comparison to EVERYONE else who plays this game. Theres no best on this server. There is only the best. And what defines the BEST? Well that depends on what you are trying to do. I have seen enough POSTERS, who are rarer than you'd believe, to see that there are many hulks survivng hulkageddon. There are many mission runners who have never been ganked. There's even a person who's never been podded. WTF?! The only people who complain about the game on the forums are the ones who can't play it. n00bs. Let me show you when I was a n00b. the beginning12lolfunfactorwhileratting /bennyhillvoice Back in my day, high sec was only for new players, Wardecs against sovereign and ALTS of the sovereign. The fact that there are people who think that they can live there indefinitely unharassed is appalling to the meaning of the game. |

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
37
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:23:00 -
[92] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Aramatheia wrote: perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light"
They could be kidding or RPing. Or they could be serious, what do I care? Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe. I am not saying all of this applies to you, personally. But it does apply to most of the people who are writing threads whinging about getting ganked. As for respect, if you don't like shooting exhumers, that's totally fine. But you have to admit that ganking exhumers is also totally fine and is at the very least, more effort than AFK mining is. Whether you respect the gankers for their specialized skills (it does take some skill to pull off successful, cost effective ganks) or not is entirely up to you.
i'm not joining the bandwagon of delete guns from highsec. In fact i think im guilty of becoming what i actually hate and that is a person who hates another demographic just cause of how they act. I'll get over myself soon enough i hope. I dont hate the act of blowing stuff up, its just the attitudes the most vocal supporters have. Like thier some sort of CCP/Eve saviour crew.
You may be right it could all be just RP and i might just be making myself look like a big ass fail on these forums. Thats something im willing to eat i guess, just like when i lost my last mining ship. If you look me up on those combat board thingo's you'll see i've had almost no pvp experience. But thats not cause im scared to lose a ship, but mostly cause i havent found an enjoyable means of doing it yet.
For the time being i'll just carry on providing the tools pvpers use to do thier thing, and in another 5 days i'll roll out my own tanked hulk and up the output further |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1845
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 08:54:00 -
[93] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Aramatheia wrote: perhaps not all gankers, but what about the ones who yell without hesitation how all high sec players need to be killed. They send a pretty loud and clear message. And while im not saying highsec should be immune. I think they should first off realise that high sec mining isnt the bountifull bag of goodness they think (except for 25/8 botters). And that thier not champions of a noble cause. Thier kicking kittens, not really anyhting to be proud off. I respect killmails showing fighting ships a hell of alot more than killmails of hulks, mackinaws and industrials.
dont make high sec safe, but drop the acts of "high sec mining is too rich" and "champions of the light"
They could be kidding or RPing. Or they could be serious, what do I care? Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe. I am not saying all of this applies to you, personally. But it does apply to most of the people who are writing threads whinging about getting ganked. As for respect, if you don't like shooting exhumers, that's totally fine. But you have to admit that ganking exhumers is also totally fine and is at the very least, more effort than AFK mining is. Whether you respect the gankers for their specialized skills (it does take some skill to pull off successful, cost effective ganks) or not is entirely up to you. i'm not joining the bandwagon of delete guns from highsec. In fact i think im guilty of becoming what i actually hate and that is a person who hates another demographic just cause of how they act. I'll get over myself soon enough i hope. I dont hate the act of blowing stuff up, its just the attitudes the most vocal supporters have. Like thier some sort of CCP/Eve saviour crew. You may be right it could all be just RP and i might just be making myself look like a big ass fail on these forums. Thats something im willing to eat i guess, just like when i lost my last mining ship. If you look me up on those combat board thingo's you'll see i've had almost no pvp experience. But thats not cause im scared to lose a ship, but mostly cause i havent found an enjoyable means of doing it yet. For the time being i'll just carry on providing the tools pvpers use to do thier thing, and in another 5 days i'll roll out my own tanked hulk and up the output further
You are an EvE player who mines. Your attitude is exactly what's missing from the miner's who are stuck in EvE and whine about it.
Now stop letting yourself get conned into not shooting people. Go do it. Maybe join a corp that suits your style. For a PvP intro, RvB is pretty good, Rifterlings and Black Rebel Rifter Club fly frigates, that's what's off the top of my head. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Arec Bardwin
Perkone Caldari State
603
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 09:34:00 -
[94] - Quote
Brilliant
|

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 12:25:00 -
[95] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions. Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much Hello Spacefriend,
We are not ganking miners so we can pretend to do CCPs job of clearing out miners for them. CCP doesn't need us to hold their hands (but I might just let them if they ask nice and act real gentlemanly about it!)
Also, bots don't whine about being shot on the forums for days after the fact. I'm personally holding out for a bot program that will though~ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7816
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 12:29:00 -
[96] - Quote
Dakeen Kurvora wrote:Oh here is a good one. Guy says mining is PVP. Another guy says miners don't want to PVP. Huh? What's confusing you about it?
Mining is PvP. Miners wish it weren't.
Also, miners say they don't want to PvP. Others say the already are, through their mining.
Not that difficult. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
38
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 13:45:00 -
[97] - Quote
David Cedarbridge wrote:Aramatheia wrote:Disregard That wrote:Statistically speaking why would more botters be caught in high-sec than in low-sec?
Are you implying that CCP uses different metrics between the two security levels?
Maybe null doesn't have logs?
Statistically, if more botters are caught in Caldari High-sec than anywhere else, that means that in all likelihood that's where the most botters are.
Edit: I like the part how I'm winning Eve and you tell me I'm losing. so why dont the hulkageddoners focus on the botting hotspots. players will all lose ships its a given, but when its a bunch of ones and zeros commanding pilotless ships from a basement computer farm to mine 25/8 well thats not a hisec "whiner" or "bear" thats just dirty ass scum. Kill that crap, wipe them out. Theres your holy crusade, now go forth champions. Also im still failing to understand where all the ungodly wealth supposedly is in highsec mining. pyroxeres? the odd kernite belt? really? 3-4 hours to pay for a covetor, is 10m an hour really that insane? gee all you guys need to play more if 10m per hour is too much Hello Spacefriend, We are not ganking miners so we can pretend to do CCPs job of clearing out miners for them. CCP doesn't need us to hold their hands (but I might just let them if they ask nice and act real gentlemanly about it!) Also, bots don't whine about being shot on the forums for days after the fact. I'm personally holding out for a bot program that will though~
sigh i typed a huge long post in reply to this but upon clicking post it erased my post and left me with nothing.. im not retyping it all just want to say read my last post, the one you quoted is one where im doing what i hate which is, raging at people raging at people.
im not against stuff blowing up nor am i against protecting my own assets and making them less appealing to the folks who do the blowing up
|

ctx2007
Wychwood and Wells
76
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 14:19:00 -
[98] - Quote
On the rare occasion when I mine, I carry t2 medium combat drones for self defence to at least give me a fighting chance to escape.
This does seem to be common practise when not mining afk. On the the other hand, There are miners who use mining drones as well as the roid lasers ( I dont see the point of this when the yield is huge on the mine strippers).
I know Eve is hard, but at the same time a great game, after 6 years playing I still cant beleive the doctine of some miners is to go for all out yield instead of investing some time and isk on self-defence when its also a game of survival.
I dont pretend to know what they are thinking and can only guess its these guys that are posting and crying about being raped soz ganked in hi-sec.
Enjoy your game  |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
480
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 15:51:00 -
[99] - Quote
Uinuva Karma wrote:Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want. Get hot-dropped a week later and lose it all...
WTF kind of crack are you on?
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy Black Sun Alliance
222
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:03:00 -
[100] - Quote
Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve. "EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler * Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game. "I'm also against the lack of danger and the awful boring times when you are just chugging along and nothing threatens you." --CCP Oveur, 2004.07.01 "All of it occured in the same framework of unrestricted player movement and limitless player choice in a single, shared game universe. As our senior producer put it 'f*cking brilliant'." --CCP Explorer in reference to Burn JitaYou are never really soloing, and you are really always PVPing. Whether you acknowledge this, and how well you do this is your only choice while playing eve. You have never sold a mod to an NPC. Every mineral you mine lowers the value of EVERY other player's minerals. Every rat you pop lowers the isk value of every other players isk. Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make. This is PVP. Player versus Player. This is EVE. Everybody Versus Everybody. They have the right to stop you. If your ship so happens to be in space it is a valid target, no matter what type of ship it is, what part of the cluster it resides, what mods it has fitted, no matter what you think. Over the course of EVE's life, the players have adopted a number of mottos embodying the true spirit of the game. Some of which include: Don't fly what you can't afford to lose.
Adapt or Die.
Harden the **** up. (HTFU)
Go back to world of warcraft (GB2WoW)
If you are having problems with the playstyle of others, it must be suggested that you refer to the above in order. After exhausting the first three, you may feel like this: EVE is hard.At this point of desperation, you may still be tempted to post on the forums about why you're leaving, at which point you will be showered with this well known question: Can I have your stuff?
Nobody cares that you're leaving because you can't fend for yourself. Sure the Devs may attempt balance things here and there, such as making certain things even harder, but your hand will not be held. They are not being paid to babysit. They are being paid to share their dream with us. That dream includes the pain of significant loss. Many players have had a problem with other players. You are not the first, and you won't be the last. The difference between the wheat and the chaff is: they do something about it. They don't whine. When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week. When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today. So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please. *the actual quote is here as pointed out by Yuda Mann
No intelligent person has said " let's remove all the danger from the game" or even just from high sec. What they've said that riles your feathers is that suicide ganking is overpowered, the battles are lopsided, and they need to be re-examined... that's all.
Yeah goon is the new bob... great.
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/OldST.jpg[/IMG] |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7816
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:04:00 -
[101] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Uinuva Karma wrote:Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want. Get hot-dropped a week later and lose it all... If that's how strong you want it to be, yes. If not, then no. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
146
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:06:00 -
[102] - Quote
Aramatheia wrote:sigh i typed a huge long post in reply to this but upon clicking post it erased my post and left me with nothing.. im not retyping it all just want to say read my last post, the one you quoted is one where im doing what i hate which is, raging at people raging at people.
im not against stuff blowing up nor am i against protecting my own assets and making them less appealing to the folks who do the blowing up
What I presented wasn't raging.
It was statistical analysis. And in so doing, I presented a counter-argument to a logical fallacy based on bad stats analysis.
I am sorry if my facts appeared like raging to you. I clearly wasn't. I hope after stepping away from the keyboard and taking some chill pills you can now see this.
LOL @ the thought of that quote being raging. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
480
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:16:00 -
[103] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Uinuva Karma wrote:Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want. Get hot-dropped a week later and lose it all... If that's how strong you want it to be, yes. If not, then no. "horsepuckey"
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:18:00 -
[104] - Quote
Barbara Nichole wrote:Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve. "EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler * Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game........ ............ .....When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week. When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today. So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please. *the actual quote is here as pointed out by Yuda Mann No intelligent person has said " let's remove all the danger from the game" or even just from high sec. What they've said that riles your feathers is that suicide ganking is overpowered, the battles are lopsided, and they need to be re-examined... that's all. Yeah goon is the new bob... great.
Hulks can be tanked such that they are unprofitable to gank (even counting the GSF bounty, which is not a game mechanic) Hulks can be flown in such a way that they are impossible to gank without pilot error on the Hulk's part
Suicide Ganks can be disrupted quite easily
The battles are only lopsided because one side doesn't bother putting any effort into the fight because they feel they're entitled to safety without effort. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Disregard That
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
146
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:21:00 -
[105] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Barbara Nichole wrote:Qolde wrote:Welcome to Eve. "EVE isn't designed to just look like a cold, dark and harsh world, it's designed to be a cold, dark and harsh world." --CCP Wrangler * Nonconsensual Ship combat will not go away. Eve didn't even have sentry guns or CONCORD at the beginning. It is part of the core philosophy of the game........ ............ .....When Band of Brothers believed that G Alliance had a mothership on the build, they didn't whine for them to be nerfed, they round up others who would fight with them, and sieged EC-P8R 23/7 for a week. When Goonswarm first started. They weren't the most experienced players, but they had the drive. They took out veteran alliances battleship fleets with rifters. RIFTERS. Look at them today. So before you post, think about what you're going to say, and if it will even be worth your typing. Please. *the actual quote is here as pointed out by Yuda Mann No intelligent person has said " let's remove all the danger from the game" or even just from high sec. What they've said that riles your feathers is that suicide ganking is overpowered, the battles are lopsided, and they need to be re-examined... that's all. Yeah goon is the new bob... great. Hulks can be tanked such that they are unprofitable to gank (even counting the GSF bounty, which is not a game mechanic) Hulks can be flown in such a way that they are impossible to gank without pilot error on the Hulk's part Suicide Ganks can be disrupted quite easily The battles are only lopsided because one side doesn't bother putting any effort into the fight because they feel they're entitled to safety without effort. Posting to confirm that mining while aligned is totally OP because gankers will never have a chance to target their prey.
It's far too easy for them to just press the warp button.
We can only hope that miners never catch on... |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:21:00 -
[106] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Uinuva Karma wrote:Take your buddies and claim your own space, make it as strong as you want. Get hot-dropped a week later and lose it all... If that's how strong you want it to be, yes. If not, then no. "horsepuckey"
What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
480
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:37:00 -
[107] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. Thanks Ruby - I really needed to snort soda through my nose! GODDAM that's funny **** right there man! You should go into standup!
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Aramatheia
European Nuthouse
39
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:43:00 -
[108] - Quote
Disregard That wrote:Aramatheia wrote:sigh i typed a huge long post in reply to this but upon clicking post it erased my post and left me with nothing.. im not retyping it all just want to say read my last post, the one you quoted is one where im doing what i hate which is, raging at people raging at people.
im not against stuff blowing up nor am i against protecting my own assets and making them less appealing to the folks who do the blowing up
What I presented wasn't raging. It was statistical analysis. And in so doing, I presented a counter-argument to a logical fallacy based on bad stats analysis. I am sorry if my facts appeared like raging to you. I clearly wasn't. I hope after stepping away from the keyboard and taking some chill pills you can now see this. LOL @ the thought of that quote being raging.
im refering to posts where people proclaim that things like "miners are a plague dieeeeeeeeeeeee!" that sort of thing, thats what i meant
i'm not taking a side on either bench, the "dieeeeeeeee miners" or the "save meeeeeeeee"
both of them can get stuffed lol, i'll do my thing, protect my assets to the best of my ability, and replace anything if i lose it. Thats what i have always hated, the extreme forum warrioring where 1 side just runs its mouth on and on and on thinking its some sort of righteous cause. Thats all i meant, just ignore my older posts |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1856
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 16:47:00 -
[109] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. Thanks Ruby - I really needed to snort soda through my nose! GODDAM that's funny **** right there man! You should go into standup!
Thank you. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

David Cedarbridge
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 23:34:00 -
[110] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. Thanks Ruby - I really needed to snort soda through my nose! GODDAM that's funny **** right there man! You should go into standup! The irony of the case is, this post is literally the reason you will never hold sov space. You are so terrified of potential failure and are so sure already that you can't do it that you never will. I hate to break it to you, but the CFC never got the sov they have now by being the victims and it wasn't handed down to us by CCP on high. We went in rifters and we took what is ours. We lost it several times and several times we carved out something new. All without the aid of all of this glorious tech wealth we are now enjoying. You're a big kid though, if you think EVE is too hard for you, then you can stay in the shallow end of the pool. I hear its safer over there. |
|

Headerman1
The New Era C0NVICTED
20
|
Posted - 2012.06.10 23:58:00 -
[111] - Quote
One of the great things i like about Eve is the ability to troll people. It's cheap laughs are often very good :) Another awesome thing about eve is if you don't like one part of it, or it gets boring, or something happens, just go and do something else!
- Mission running - high sec mining - incursions - manufacturing - BPs - Sov warfare - Roams - NPC space fights - wormhole ops - WH living - Trading
So many things to do i think the only people who leave are people who get bored too easily. |

Headerman1
The New Era C0NVICTED
20
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:00:00 -
[112] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:What is an alliance but an organized group of people? HiSec has people, it just needs to organize.
Go take some shitty sov for a while, use the money you've made from HS's lack of constant ship loss (20% of characters are in Null yet ~50% of ships are lost there) to build up a Cap/Supercap fleet. Learn to fight. Start taking more sov. Expand into mediocre space. Then even into good space.
The last Tech holding coalition was destroyed by a coalition that did not hold any (or at least any significant) tech. It could happen to this one. Thanks Ruby - I really needed to snort soda through my nose! GODDAM that's funny **** right there man! You should go into standup! Thank you.
Drone space is pretty damn empty right now, it would be as easy as anything to get a semi decent corp together, head out there and join a small alliance, get your own system with 16 Hordes and earn a buttload of isk, build better ships and do those things |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1255
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:17:00 -
[113] - Quote
Headerman1 wrote:
Drone space is pretty damn empty right now, it would be as easy as anything to get a semi decent corp together, head out there and join a small alliance, get your own system with 16 Hordes and earn a buttload of isk, build better ships and do those things
Here's the catch:
1) You are teaching how to sing to a deaf audience.
2) Even if they could hear you, they would not care.
See I see this same mantra repeated again and again: "you are meant to get out of hi sec, go null with a lot of people (enough to get some sov), learn to PvP, build whatever structures, kills stuff, defend your turf, eventually expand and take some tech moons".
Problem is: a majority of the playerbase can't care the less of the above. They just don't see anything enticing or epic in it. Another part will go everywhere but sov null sec because of the politics, CTAs etc.
Another portion (me included) can't do it even if they wanted. 30 mins a day, possibly every 2-3 days is not going to create an empire nor to be of any use out there. It's why I WAS in null and now I am not any more. I'd just be a leech. Still, it's full subs that are paid, it's not like these peeps are squatters.
Hi sec and low sec are the only places where I could be. No time for anything else and many others are like me. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
480
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:29:00 -
[114] - Quote
David Cedarbridge wrote:The irony of the case is, this post is literally the reason you will never hold sov space. You are so terrified of potential failure and are so sure already that you can't do it that you never will. I hate to break it to you, but the CFC never got the sov they have now by being the victims and it wasn't handed down to us by CCP on high. We went in rifters and we took what is ours. We lost it several times and several times we carved out something new. All without the aid of all of this glorious tech wealth we are now enjoying. You're a big kid though, if you think EVE is too hard for you, then you can stay in the shallow end of the pool. I hear its safer over there. Yeah - I'll just round up 2500 friends and go roflstomp... oh wait... Supercaps/Caps... yeah, let me get started on that, see you in a couple years...
No kid... This is where I "got into the deep end", so I don't need a video game to do it.
And since I haven't lived in hi-sec since 2008... I just find it amusing at how serious everyone takes their game. ESPECIALLY goons...

You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7824
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:35:00 -
[115] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Yeah - I'll just round up 2500 friends and go roflstomp... oh wait... Supercaps/Caps... yeah, let me get started on that, see you in a couple years. Fun fact: you don't need a couple of years to get those unless you literally start out with zero ISK. If you do, then it'll perhaps take a few months longerGǪ
What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:41:00 -
[116] - Quote
Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest.
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
7824
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:44:00 -
[117] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:What is stopping me is lack of interest. In other words: you.
Also, good: then you can stop with the silly excuses.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:45:00 -
[118] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:What is stopping me is lack of interest. In other words: you. Also, good: then you can stop with the silly excuses.
    
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:56:00 -
[119] - Quote
Headerman1 wrote:One of the great things i like about Eve is the ability to troll people. It's cheap laughs are often very good :) Another awesome thing about eve is if you don't like one part of it, or it gets boring, or something happens, just go and do something else!
- Mission running - high sec mining - incursions - manufacturing - BPs - Sov warfare - Roams - NPC space fights - wormhole ops - WH living - Trading
So many things to do i think the only people who leave are people who get bored too easily. You forgot Exploration.
I find it very relaxing and remunerative.
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Zhihatsu
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
69
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 00:58:00 -
[120] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest.
You're right, whining and crying on the forums about how Goons are ruining your game is much more interesting than taking the fight to your tormentors. People without faces have no mouths with which to speak. |
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 01:07:00 -
[121] - Quote
Zhihatsu wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest. You're right, whining and crying on the forums about how Goons are ruining your game is much more interesting than taking the fight to your tormentors. Go back and look - you won't find a whining post from me. Keep swinging your NPC bat though, you look cute in that Ministry of War uniform!
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Private Pineapple
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
63
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 01:14:00 -
[122] - Quote
Would not read again. Support Damen Apol's proposal! -áSolve all problems with FW with a simple solution!
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119683&find=unread |

Xavier Bandar
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 01:34:00 -
[123] - Quote
Wow, you bombed the barracks? I'm not sure you should say such things on a public forum. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 14:09:00 -
[124] - Quote
Xavier Bandar wrote:Wow, you bombed the barracks? I'm not sure you should say such things on a public forum.

Kids these days...
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 14:42:00 -
[125] - Quote
Easthir Ravin wrote: Unfortunately there will always be people who poop in the sand... Stop watching me when I'm in my own backyard please... |

Qolde
Bombs Away. Nulli Tertius
44
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 15:27:00 -
[126] - Quote
You don't have to go to Sov 0.0 to not be a carebear. Almost nobody likes 0.0 politics and structure grinding, but that's just a part of the game there. NPC 0.0 is good. Hell even lowsec can be fun to build a little empire in. WH are probably the rawest form of eve you can ask for. No stations, no local, nowhere to hide in exchange for massive profit. You don't even really have to leave hisec to not be a carebear. You just have to adapt to your environment. Your environment being mostly comprised of the players around you. If someone ***** in your sandbox, light it on fire, grab your shovel, and throw it back at them. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1860
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 15:30:00 -
[127] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest.
So why complain about the people who are interested? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
481
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 16:10:00 -
[128] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest. So why complain about the people who are interested?

Don't know where that came from, or the crack about me whining about GS...
but ok...
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

Drunk Driver
Aliastra Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.06.11 16:23:00 -
[129] - Quote
Qolde wrote:If someone ***** in your sandbox, light it on fire, grab your shovel, and throw it back at them.

Hell yea!

. |

Gustavus Adolphus
Croatoan Enterprises The Silent One's
0
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 13:57:00 -
[130] - Quote
If everyone feels "entitlement", does that not mean there is none? |
|

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1279
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:03:00 -
[131] - Quote
Kijo Rikki wrote:Quote: You have never sold a mod to an NPC.
Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make.
This is PVP. Player versus Player. I will never look at the Auction House in WoW the same way again.
It's exactly the same when:
-You work you way first for faction standings
-you work your way out to have titles related to region/worl/server quests
-you work your ass out to get the 1st world/Euro vs US / server kill
-you work your ass out to get the highest tier sets/legendary weapons
-when you collect minerals/plants
-when you get your fishing titles
-when you work your ass out for pvp arena titles or stufz
And the list goes on and on.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1909
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 14:12:00 -
[132] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest. So why complain about the people who are interested?  Don't know where that came from, or the crack about me whining about GS... but ok...
Noticing your posts in other threads, I may have conflated you with other posters. Sorry. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Lexmana
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
548
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 15:28:00 -
[133] - Quote
Kijo Rikki wrote:Quote: You have never sold a mod to an NPC.
Every sale you make is a sale the other guy didn't make.
This is PVP. Player versus Player. I will never look at the Auction House in WoW the same way again. You look at the auction house in WoW? That explains a few things. |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
373
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 16:08:00 -
[134] - Quote
OP read your post and found there is absolutely nothing there to discuss. It is just a broad generic statement.
In before the lock for lack of content.
EVERYBODY KNOWS |

Barbelo Valentinian
The Scope Gallente Federation
332
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 17:03:00 -
[135] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe.
And round and round we go. What you are not getting is that the AFK aspect is why some people do mining and other AFK-able pursuits in EVE. If they can't do it, they won't "learn" anything else, they'll just leave.
And you can bet your bottom dollar that CCP wants to have such players in the game. Otherwise mining would not be as it is - it's pretty obviously designed to be one part of the game that's AFK-friendly. Their money is as good as your average EVE mini-me Nietzsche's money 
The whingeing (so far as I can see) is not about being ganked per se, it's about a concerted perma-campaign to grief miners.
A player who likes AFK playing has already accepted the compact that they'll occasionally be ganked. Even Hulkageddon per se was cool, because a canny player might take advantage of it, and anyone who was really risk-averse could just sit it out. But a perma-campaign? I doubt it will really do much good in the long run.
I think some of you guys have your heads so far up your metagame that you forget that there are plenty players of EVE for whom such concerns are meaningless, they just want to potter about in a space game. Now, anyone who wants to potter about in EVE to the extent of subscribing to it has to have accepted that they're never absolutely safe (otherwise they really are an idiot), but an OOC campaign specifically targeted against them (for the sake of someone else's silly metagame) is a whole different enchilada.
The imperceptible shift in EVE from a virtual world (where the omnipresent danger is part of the lore) to a game in which winning at all costs is all that matters, is a huge mistake.
It's a monumental stupidity to try to turn EVE into "LOL in Space".
|

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
920
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 17:06:00 -
[136] - Quote
This is quite an original thread and I am glad to have read it. Good job OP, excellent use of whitespace. |

Alia Gon'die
Aliastra Gallente Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 17:10:00 -
[137] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Zhihatsu wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia wrote:What he described is entirely accurate and the only thing that is stopping you is you. What is stopping me is lack of interest. You're right, whining and crying on the forums about how Goons are ruining your game is much more interesting than taking the fight to your tormentors. Go back and look - you won't find a whining post from me. Keep swinging your NPC bat though, you look cute in that Ministry of War uniform!
I don't see anything in that post about "post with your main" or any variation thereof. So what are you talking about? Self-appointed forums hallway monitor |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
488
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 17:26:00 -
[138] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Noticing your posts in other threads, I may have conflated you with other posters. Sorry.

/pinches self...
I'm speechless...
"Sorry" accepted..
/pinches self again...
WTH are the forums coming to...?
MANNERS IN MY EVE???!?
You know there's something fundamentally wrong when the only way people can think of to promote the "best" part of the game is to make everything else suck more. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
1916
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 21:39:00 -
[139] - Quote
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:RubyPorto wrote: Nobody's yelling that it's too rich (if they were, disrupting it would be silly, since disruption makes mineral prices go up, thus making it more lucrative). The problem is that miners have gotten used to and subsequently developed a sense of entitlement to the ability to make Isk almost completely AFK. This has lead them to (wrongly) believe that HiSec space should be "safe" or that their untanked Max Yield/Cargo Hulks should be ungankable. This belief has led them to make annoying posts on the forums. These annoying posts on the forums have led to people disliking miners due to their inability to comprehend simple premises of EvE that have not changed since Beta; namely that you are never safe.
And round and round we go. What you are not getting is that the AFK aspect is why some people do mining and other AFK-able pursuits in EVE. If they can't do it, they won't "learn" anything else, they'll just leave. And you can bet your bottom dollar that CCP wants to have such players in the game. Otherwise mining would not be as it is - it's pretty obviously designed to be one part of the game that's AFK-friendly. Their money is as good as your average EVE mini-me Nietzsche's money  The whingeing (so far as I can see) is not about being ganked per se, it's about a concerted perma-campaign to grief miners. A player who likes AFK playing has already accepted the compact that they'll occasionally be ganked. Even Hulkageddon per se was cool, because a canny player might take advantage of it, and anyone who was really risk-averse could just sit it out. But a perma-campaign? I doubt it will really do much good in the long run. I think some of you guys have your heads so far up your metagame that you forget that there are plenty players of EVE for whom such concerns are meaningless, they just want to potter about in a space game. Now, anyone who wants to potter about in EVE to the extent of subscribing to it has to have accepted that they're never absolutely safe (otherwise they really are an idiot), but an OOC campaign specifically targeted against them (for the sake of someone else's silly metagame) is a whole different enchilada. The imperceptible shift in EVE from a virtual world (where the omnipresent danger is part of the lore) to a game in which winning at all costs is all that matters, is a huge mistake. It's a monumental stupidity to try to turn EVE into "LOL in Space".
What's wrong with the campaign? Either ganking is allowed or it's not. There're no fishing quotas to be enforced. There's no hunting season. There's just what players decide to do within the rules.
If they've accepted the risk of ganks, and aren't complaining when they get ganked, then I've got no problem with them. They understand that that risk may vary due to other players actions.
Winning at all costs has been the only thing that matters since day one. Look at the history of Nullsec. BoB engaged the entire GBC against the Goons because I think they noticed that the Goons were a potential threat. The entire weight of the GBC against an alliance fielding Rifter fleets. BoB and the GBC vs a bunch of newbies in Rifters. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Makkal Hanaya
Drakenburg
126
|
Posted - 2012.06.15 21:48:00 -
[140] - Quote
Alia Gon'die wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote: Go back and look - you won't find a whining post from me. Keep swinging your NPC bat though, you look cute in that Ministry of War uniform!
I don't see anything in that post about "post with your main" or any variation thereof. So what are you talking about? I think she's calling you an NPC alt, so critical comments from you are your NPC bat. although my eyes were open they might have just as well've been closed
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |