EVE Search - CCP needs to take over ebank

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Market Discussions

CCP needs to take over ebank

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
sitar seaton	Posted - 2009.11.23 08:51:00 - [1] The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good.
Angus McSpork	Posted - 2009.11.23 08:54:00 - [2] The current keyboards of stupid posters are a bunch of incompetent tools. CCP needs to sieze the keyboards of all current and past stupid posters, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to people hurt reading such stupidity. The sad ongoing saga of cluelessness is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good.
Festidious Verrucas Draconis Alumni	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:05:00 - [3] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. You see the "transfer ISK To Bank" Button on your wallet? No because there isn't one - CCP never designed "banks" as part of EvE - so therefore they are NOT supported whatsoever by CCP. They are the same as the secondary markets, which are the investors total responsibility to cover if it happens to go **** up! - It's not down to CCP at all. Fly safe, Fes.
flakeys T.H.U.G L.I.F.E The Volition Cult	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:14:00 - [4] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. priceless
Vaerah Vahrokha Minmatar Dark-Rising IT Alliance	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:27:00 - [5] In Before Obama. - Auditing and consulting Before asking for investors, please read http://tinyurl.com/n5ys4h and http://tinyurl.com/lrg4oz
SentryRaven KIA Corp KIA Alliance	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:32:00 - [6] I endorse this product and/or service. --------
Aerilis	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:38:00 - [7] 3/10
Liberty Eternal	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:43:00 - [8] OP is clearly a communist
Jmanis Catharg Caldari Dusk Blade Logisitcals	Posted - 2009.11.23 09:50:00 - [9] I've often thought the same about 0.0 alliances. OP makes very good points. --- Originally by: CCP Mitnal I went to the forums for special powers and all I got was a dancing padlock and a banhammer.
Block Ukx Forge Laboratories	Posted - 2009.11.23 14:22:00 - [10] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. Scamming is allowed in eve, so I donÆt see CCP closing EBANK anytime soon. ItÆs really up to its customers to take any action against EBANK. Originally by: sitar seaton The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. EBANK has definitely created a bad reputation for banks and IPOs. The secondary market is almost dead thanks to EBANK. BSAC Mineral Market Manipulation (MinMa) Information Desk

flakeys T.H.U.G L.I.F.E The Volition Cult	Posted - 2009.11.23 14:29:00 - [11] Originally by: Block Ukx EBANK has definitely created a bad reputation for banks and IPOs. The secondary market is almost dead thanks to EBANK. Ebank has an impact on banks in eve but i don't see them discouraging new ipo offerings in any way.There is even a thread as the why/how of the high amount of new loan/ipo offers on the MD lately. The only effect it could have is for high unsecured ipo's wich are only based on the name/rep a person has and even then i think people's short memmory will save the day for that person and the offer get's filled within a short time.
SetrakDark Caldari DarkCorp Technology and Finance	Posted - 2009.11.23 14:39:00 - [12] Originally by: flakeys Originally by: Block Ukx EBANK has definitely created a bad reputation for banks and IPOs. The secondary market is almost dead thanks to EBANK. Ebank has an impact on banks in eve but i don't see them discouraging new ipo offerings in any way.There is even a thread as the why/how of the high amount of new loan/ipo offers on the MD lately. The only effect it could have is for high unsecured ipo's wich are only based on the name/rep a person has and even then i think people's short memmory will save the day for that person and the offer get's filled within a short time. Ya, the death of the old "MD Rep" system, which is what EBank etc really hurt, is a good thing anyway.
Krathos Morpheus Legion Infernal	Posted - 2009.11.23 14:39:00 - [13] Edited by: Krathos Morpheus on 23/11/2009 14:40:33 Guys, do you really need to reply to this? It is so obvious... (And before someone said so do you, it was on the first row when I posted) _+_ "It is the unofficial force ù the Jita irregulars. " EVEwatch Sidebar soon
K'uata Sayus	Posted - 2009.11.23 15:37:00 - [14] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. Better yet, let the CSM take over to give them something to do. If they pull it off with any amount of expertise then their credibility will soar. Yeah, right........ EVERYONE SEEMS NORMAL UNTIL YOU GET TO KNOW THEM.
flakeys T.H.U.G L.I.F.E The Volition Cult	Posted - 2009.11.23 16:04:00 - [15] Originally by: Krathos Morpheus Edited by: Krathos Morpheus on 23/11/2009 14:40:33 Guys, do you really need to reply to this? It is so obvious... (And before someone said so do you, it was on the first row when I posted) so do you
Ray McCormack Kisoken Innovations	Posted - 2009.11.23 17:12:00 - [16] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. Clearly you work for CCP and want to take credit for all the good work we are doing. Titan BPC Auction \| Some people call me the space cowboy, yeah
Ki'rin Talloth	Posted - 2009.11.23 17:34:00 - [17] If you have a problem with eBank, don't use their services. If you use their services and got ripped off, sux for you. Buyer Beware. If you don't use their services, what the hell are you complaining about?
Kalrand Charles Ponzi School of Business GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.11.23 17:35:00 - [18] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. Actually, the board of ebank is made of of quite competent thieves.
Turiel Demon Minmatar Blue Republic	Posted - 2009.11.23 17:44:00 - [19] 2/10
Valrandir Elemental Mercury Dystopia Alliance	Posted - 2009.11.23 17:48:00 - [20] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. no This has surpassed the Yarrdware specification and has been dubbed Uberware.

Sawyer LaFleur	Posted - 2009.11.23 18:28:00 - [21] Diverting the thread slightly... I think that some sort of bank-like entity in game mechanics should be implemented. It should not pay interest; perhaps even have a slightly negative interest with transaction fees etc. --- player operated banks and investments are part of the sandbox and shouldnÆt be circumvented 000 possible incremental increases in game mechanics aiding collateral or collections on defaults would belong to a separate thread as any would be quite complicated and have many issues to parse out. REASONs for an alternative "bank-like entity" (again with slight penalties) Ways to create an incremental level of security from key loggers. A combo similar to those on station lockers while not foolproof to certain screen capture loggers, would make their job more difficult and foil some of them. Giving players an ability to limit losses by key stroke or momentary loss of concentration. Having 3 billion isk (or maybe 30 billion) in your general wallet is really a risk if you accidentally enter an extra few digits on a market order and donÆt visually catch the mistake. Some of that is part of the game, but from a role play virtual reality perspective itÆs sort of ridiculous that you could make such a large transaction without some sort of banker intervention. It should be entirely the playersÆ responsibility to take such measures up front, but game mechanics give me no way to set aside certain portions of my isk more securely . Some way to separate portions of isk from your wallet would be useful.
FunzzeR Death of Virtue MeatSausage EXPRESS	Posted - 2009.11.23 18:57:00 - [22] Originally by: Sawyer LaFleur Diverting the thread slightly... I think that some sort of bank-like entity in game mechanics should be implemented. It should not pay interest; perhaps even have a slightly negative interest with transaction fees etc. --- player operated banks and investments are part of the sandbox and shouldnÆt be circumvented 000 possible incremental increases in game mechanics aiding collateral or collections on defaults would belong to a separate thread as any would be quite complicated and have many issues to parse out. REASONs for an alternative "bank-like entity" (again with slight penalties) Ways to create an incremental level of security from key loggers. A combo similar to those on station lockers while not foolproof to certain screen capture loggers, would make their job more difficult and foil some of them. Giving players an ability to limit losses by key stroke or momentary loss of concentration. Having 3 billion isk (or maybe 30 billion) in your general wallet is really a risk if you accidentally enter an extra few digits on a market order and donÆt visually catch the mistake. Some of that is part of the game, but from a role play virtual reality perspective itÆs sort of ridiculous that you could make such a large transaction without some sort of banker intervention. It should be entirely the playersÆ responsibility to take such measures up front, but game mechanics give me no way to set aside certain portions of my isk more securely . Some way to separate portions of isk from your wallet would be useful. Such a system already exists, its called your wallet. No need to create a unnecessary mechanic when additional functionality can be added to existing ones, if they are needed.
Jinx Barker Caldari GFB Scientific	Posted - 2009.11.23 19:27:00 - [23] LOL I hope not. As soon as we start practicing Obamanomics in EVE financial markets, we are all in trouble. Oh, and most people already know e-bank is kaput, we just witnessing death trashing, and gurgling, just seems to be going on for too long.
Festidious Verrucas Draconis Alumni	Posted - 2009.11.23 20:09:00 - [24] Originally by: Jinx Barker LOL I hope not. As soon as we start practicing Obamanomics in EVE financial markets, we are all in trouble. Oh, and most people already know e-bank is kaput, we just witnessing death trashing, and gurgling, just seems to be going on for too long. Nothing that a 250mm Light Artillery Cannon II couldn't solve - infact, it might be the only decent thing to do - put them, the investors and the rest of us out of the missery that is ebank Fly safe, Fes.
Sawyer LaFleur	Posted - 2009.11.23 20:26:00 - [25] Quote: Such a system already exists, its called your wallet. No need to create a unnecessary mechanic when additional functionality can be added to existing ones, if they are needed. Really ? If it does thats great and I'd love to know.. sometimes you do learn from this forums. But I suspect that you didn't read what I thought was missing. I think that you should have a mechanism where you can set portions of isk aside in a seperate bank account (second wallet ? ) so you can't accidently spend it with a few bad clicks or faulty eyesight if you're tired or being rushed by outside factors . It just doesn't make sense that you could spend 4 billion when you meant to spend 4 million but even leaving that mess up factor in the game, itf a player had a tool they could use to recue that risk by their own isk management that would be great and sensible.
Roos Stormshadow	Posted - 2009.11.23 20:32:00 - [26] Originally by: Sawyer LaFleur It should be entirely the playersÆ responsibility to take such measures up front, but game mechanics give me no way to set aside certain portions of my isk more securely . Some way to separate portions of isk from your wallet would be useful. It would be great to be able to set up multiple "Accounts" in your wallet.
Mme Pinkerton Caldari	Posted - 2009.11.23 20:33:00 - [27] Originally by: Sawyer LaFleur I think that you should have a mechanism where you can set portions of isk aside in a seperate bank account (second wallet ? ) so you can't accidently spend it with a few bad clicks or faulty eyesight if you're tired or being rushed by outside factors . It just doesn't make sense that you could spend 4 billion when you meant to spend 4 million but even leaving that mess up factor in the game, itf a player had a tool they could use to recue that risk by their own isk management that would be great and sensible. most people use isk-holding alts or corp wallet divisions for this (the latter does exactly what you want to have).
Liberty Eternal	Posted - 2009.11.23 21:01:00 - [28] Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. I take back what I said about the OP being a communist. CCP DO need to take over Ebank. Am I right in thinking that the majority of Ebank holdings were not stolen by Ricdic but are about to be stolen instead by the current regime? And that said regime is trying to turn the bank into some kind of offensive intelligence agency?
Wyehr Rage of Inferno	Posted - 2009.11.23 21:58:00 - [29] Originally by: Liberty Eternal Originally by: sitar seaton The current board of ebank are a bunch of incompetent thieves. CCP needs to sieze the assets of all current and past board members, sell all of them, and distribute the cash to account holders. The sad ongoing saga of ebank is a stain on the game and will continue to be bad pr until it is forcibly closed down by CCP for good. I take back what I said about the OP being a communist. CCP DO need to take over Ebank. Am I right in thinking that the majority of Ebank holdings were not stolen by Ricdic but are about to be stolen instead by the current regime? And that said regime is trying to turn the bank into some kind of offensive intelligence agency? Dude, your ISK is GONE. Get that through your head right now. GONE. It was GONE the moment you clicked OK on the ISK donation box. In return, you got an unenforcable promise that someone would donate ISK to you later. The people that made that promise are GONE too. The people running ebank now didn't take your money, and they didn't make any promises to you. I don't know how much you lost or what that amount means to you, but your ranting and raving in every ******* thread in MD has gone from "angry" to "needs his meds adjusted" in a disturbingly short time.
LaVista Vista Conservative Shenanigans Party	Posted - 2009.11.23 22:03:00 - [30] Originally by: Liberty Eternal And that said regime is trying to turn the bank into some kind of offensive intelligence agency? If only that was the grand master plan, that would be truly epic. But I hate to break it to you: It's not the case.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.