EVE Search - What do you think the next expension should have?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What do you think the next expension should have?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Acrid Acid	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:28:00 - [1] What do you want? More contents? or Bug/issues fixing? or Overhaul of subpar features? Personnaly, I want the third option. Its time for a factionnal warfare overhaul, for an NPC overhaul, for an interface overhaul and a POS overhaul. There have been a lot of topics about all these subjects with tons of ideas to fix their problem and yet havent seen much of an improvement. Also, another thing that really annoy me, its the LACK of consistency; correspondence or uniformity among the parts of a complex thing. But you, what do you think?
Lord Haur Amarr Reaction Theory	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:31:00 - [2] d) All of the above.
Abrazzar	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:35:00 - [3] Second and third point. The third includes the first one anyway. --------
Chaos Incarnate Faceless Logistics	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:38:00 - [4] I vote for the all-of-the-above option, too If you add a bug fix patch, people will complain that there are still bugs, and that there's no new content, and the old stuff sucks If you add a content patch, people will complain that there are lots of bugs, and that the new content blows, and the old content isn't fixed If you add an overhaul patch, people will complain that x or y didn't get overhauled and it's totally not fair that z did, and also that there are bugs and no 'new' content If you add a bit of everything, everyone will still complain about everything, but they'll spend more time yelling at each other about what's more important. An eight on the whine-o-meter that could generate superthreadnaughts instead generates a few small threads of carebears hating pirates and nullsec hating missions. Thus, victory. _____________________ Horrors! Demons in the deep!
Fortune Taker Caldari	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:38:00 - [5] stuff FT if you see this you have read too far
De'Veldrin Minmatar Special Projects Executive The Obsidian Legion	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:43:00 - [6] Originally by: Chaos Incarnate I vote for the all-of-the-above option, too If you add a bug fix patch, people will complain that there are still bugs, and that there's no new content, and the old stuff sucks If you add a content patch, people will complain that there are lots of bugs, and that the new content blows, and the old content isn't fixed If you add an overhaul patch, people will complain that x or y didn't get overhauled and it's totally not fair that z did, and also that there are bugs and no 'new' content If you add a bit of everything, everyone will still complain about everything, but they'll spend more time yelling at each other about what's more important. An eight on the whine-o-meter that could generate superthreadnaughts instead generates a few small threads of carebears hating pirates and nullsec hating missions. Thus, victory. Minimize the whining by spreading it out. --Vel Brand new year, same old attitude.
Acrid Acid	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:45:00 - [7] Edited by: Acrid Acid on 05/01/2010 00:45:42 @Lord haur or w/e, damn 5min cooldown. Bwahahaha, in your dreams. Now, something plausible for a change?
Frank Jackson Minmatar	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:46:00 - [8] I want: Working sound! the sound issue is going on for a pretty long time now: www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1239937
DeathRavens	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:48:00 - [9] Tech 3 frigates + tech 3 battleships + walking in stations anyone?! lol
Zeredek Gallente Blue Republic	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:50:00 - [10] Exotic Dancers Zeredek Not a moderator Originally by: Rolk Anderson Words cannot describe the hatred I feel for you Zeredek.

Danton Marcellus Nebula Rasa Holdings	Posted - 2010.01.05 00:58:00 - [11] Ambulation. Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav! Also Known As
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Prime Orbital Systems	Posted - 2010.01.05 01:08:00 - [12] Originally by: DeathRavens Tech 3 frigates + tech 3 battleships + walking in stations anyone?! lol --
Serge Bastana Gallente GWA Corp	Posted - 2010.01.05 01:09:00 - [13] Edited by: Serge Bastana on 05/01/2010 01:09:46 Free toilet facilities for all, especially the elderly. And Monkey Tennis, not sure what it entails, but you know it won't be disciplined. ------------------------------------------------ You either need a punch up the throat or a good shag. Nobody round here is offering the second one therefore your choices are limited!
Chaos Incarnate Faceless Logistics	Posted - 2010.01.05 01:26:00 - [14] Originally by: De'Veldrin Minimize the whining by spreading it out. Yup. Everyone gets something they want, no one gets everything they want. _____________________ Horrors! Demons in the deep!
Lidirt Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2010.01.05 01:33:00 - [15] Personally I'd like to see a lot more ships. I know there's already lots of them, but even more variety couldn't hurt. T3 frigates More variety in T2 battlecruisers (or t3 battlecruisers) Try to make PVE more fun somehow Make mining actually worth the time (T3 barges?)
Forum Reprentative	Posted - 2010.01.05 01:58:00 - [16] Any new toys and even more options and things to do are always welcome. Rebalancing the 3 sec systems. High-sec is overcrowded, low-sec useless and 0.0 still for the big and powerful big alliances.
Captain Hooker	Posted - 2010.01.05 02:02:00 - [17] 1. Improve Sound Effects 2. Custom Skins for ships 3. I so want to fly my ship by Joystick
Caldari 5 Amarr The Element Syndicate Black Mesa Project	Posted - 2010.01.05 02:51:00 - [18] POS Overhaul, General S&I UI Overhaul And other Bug Fixes
Mr Epeen	Posted - 2010.01.05 03:05:00 - [19] Well lots of things come to mind that I'd like to see in the next expansion, but the main ones are: Remove insurance Reduce each account to one character Remove free trials Mr Epeen
Condor Hawk	Posted - 2010.01.05 03:14:00 - [20] Originally by: Frank Jackson I want: Working sound! the sound issue is going on for a pretty long time now: www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1239937 Eve has sound?

Tekutep	Posted - 2010.01.05 03:27:00 - [21] Originally by: Condor Hawk Originally by: Frank Jackson I want: Working sound! the sound issue is going on for a pretty long time now: www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1239937 Eve has sound? Wow! You're so original!
Acrid Acid	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:31:00 - [22] Its funny how a topic without trolls or obviously bad ideas can die so quickly...
Ick Ickagami	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:37:00 - [23] The next expansion should have a failsafe built into the logic where if the node begins to be overloaded with blob warfare, the ship proximity avoidance subsystem is "rebooted", and for the duration of the reboot ships in motion become weapons, doing damage and taking damage as would be the case. Also connected to this period of loss of damage control would be the failure of "splash damage" protection systems. Collateral damage would be felt from explosions and nearby ship destructions. In short, a properly placed volley could cause a chain reaction of damage that could, theoretically, wipe out an entire blob, thus reducing the stress load on the server's calculations of objects in space. Can you just imagine the carnage? Oh, it would be sweet.
Blane Xero Amarr The Firestorm Cartel	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:43:00 - [24] Working code. _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008 Originally by: CCP Fallout :facepalm:
domitesting	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:47:00 - [25] Fix the lag NO 1 - that may need a significant code and hardware change which is an expansion in it self.. Fix the bugs THATS IT - NO MORE!!! No more subpar features or anything.
Zothike Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:49:00 - [26] the "formations" feature to solve (eventually) the big fleet battle lag or at least lower lag to reasonable level all other features would be bonus
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet	Posted - 2010.01.05 13:55:00 - [27] What CI said.
Scout Ops	Posted - 2010.01.05 14:49:00 - [28] - Jita security fixed from current 0.9 to 0.6 and disable its local channel. This will reduce lag and carebearing. - Crokite and Dark Ochre roids for lowsec belts. This will make lowsec more appealing. - Total revamp of corporation roles - for both better management and security. This will improve corp management. - Make something about thieves and robbers. Some like they can't sell on market stuff marked as corp-property. This will improve corp confidence and teamplay: no more paranoid and solo-play just in case robbers... - Fixed wardec fees: 1m/week/member of victims corp. 3m/week/member if its an alliance. Fixed corp founding fee: from current 1.6m to 100m. This will help the joke that wardecs and corp-hoping are. - Addition of market transaction taxes, for transactions bigger than 100k ISK. Customizable from 0.1% to 1.0% as max to prevent lolrobbery and trading ruin... This adds an awesome financing source for corps and its more fair than missions tax, but this can still be kept. - NPC market tax = 5% ; NPC missions tax = 20%. Want protection, pay for it! - Disable mining barges and exhumers in the 12 noob systems. In your face, macrominers. - NPC members can't fly following ships: Exhumers, Battleships, Freighters. - CEOs can set a tax for members quiting corp. Customizable from 1m to 100m. This will prevent from corp jumpers and ragequits. - Default CSPA charge fixed from current 2,950 to 7,950 ISK. Its currently too cheap to spam around. Max should be dropped from 1m to 100k, though. - Disable block automatically conversation invites. In your face macrominers!!!
Boomershoot Caldari Suddenly Ninjas	Posted - 2010.01.05 14:58:00 - [29] Originally by: Scout Ops - Jita security fixed from current 0.9 to 0.6 and disable its local channel. This will reduce lag and carebearing. - Crokite and Dark Ochre roids for lowsec belts. This will make lowsec more appealing. - Total revamp of corporation roles - for both better management and security. This will improve corp management. - Make something about thieves and robbers. Some like they can't sell on market stuff marked as corp-property. This will improve corp confidence and teamplay: no more paranoid and solo-play just in case robbers... - Fixed wardec fees: 1m/week/member of victims corp. 3m/week/member if its an alliance. Fixed corp founding fee: from current 1.6m to 100m. This will help the joke that wardecs and corp-hoping are. - Addition of market transaction taxes, for transactions bigger than 100k ISK. Customizable from 0.1% to 1.0% as max to prevent lolrobbery and trading ruin... This adds an awesome financing source for corps and its more fair than missions tax, but this can still be kept. - NPC market tax = 5% ; NPC missions tax = 20%. Want protection, pay for it! - Disable mining barges and exhumers in the 12 noob systems. In your face, macrominers. - NPC members can't fly following ships: Exhumers, Battleships, Freighters. - CEOs can set a tax for members quiting corp. Customizable from 1m to 100m. This will prevent from corp jumpers and ragequits. - Default CSPA charge fixed from current 2,950 to 7,950 ISK. Its currently too cheap to spam around. Max should be dropped from 1m to 100k, though. - Disable block automatically conversation invites. In your face macrominers!!! in light of this: "Don't show [character name] posts" as a forum feature.
Ahka Maro	Posted - 2010.01.05 15:08:00 - [30] More fixes to existing issues. Overhaul subpar features, or remove them entirely. The game is deep enough as it is.



Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.