EVE Search - Carrier issue

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Carrier issue

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Traspace	Posted - 2010.05.27 02:13:00 - [31] Originally by: War Kitten Tell 'em Boxxy... That made me rofl
DaReaper Net 7 The Last Brigade	Posted - 2010.05.27 02:34:00 - [32] Yup i can;t delegate fighters to anyone not on the same grid as me
Windjammer Gallente	Posted - 2010.05.27 02:37:00 - [33] Edited by: Windjammer on 27/05/2010 02:40:31 If true, it'll be the same technique they used last patch to gut/nerf the Moros. Then a couple days after the release they slipped the addition into the patch notes. A side note: I do not need a staffer (CCP Atropos) from a company we pay money to making wiseass comments in the forums when a reasonable question is asked. Have a little respect for your customers. You aren't the only act in town. Windjammer
Brock Nelson Caldari Flux Technologies Inc SRS.	Posted - 2010.05.27 03:02:00 - [34] Originally by: War Kitten Tell 'em Boxxy... What the ****? Store
JC Anderson Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2010.05.27 04:34:00 - [35] Originally by: Brock Nelson Originally by: War Kitten Tell 'em Boxxy... What the ****? Don't ask. Boxxy is an annoyingly popular internet fad much like Cocolate rain. If you go as far as to watch other Boxxy videos on youtube then please understand I am not responsible for the carnage wrought upon your psyche.
Pikkuhukka Caldari Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United	Posted - 2010.05.27 05:43:00 - [36] Originally by: JC Anderson Originally by: Brock Nelson Originally by: War Kitten Tell 'em Boxxy... What the ****? Don't ask. Boxxy is an annoyingly popular internet fad much like Cocolate rain. If you go as far as to watch other Boxxy videos on youtube then please understand I am not responsible for the carnage wrought upon your psyche. my luvs boxxy <3
AnonyTerrorNinja Minmatar Buggers' Advanced Interstellar Transport	Posted - 2010.05.27 06:07:00 - [37] Edited by: AnonyTerrorNinja on 27/05/2010 06:17:12 Captain Carrier > Launch all zig! Captain Carrier > Men, I want you to get out there and support First Sergeant Fluffles! Firbolgs > Neg Captain, we lack locus signal. Captain Carrier > Someone set them up the signal. First Sergeant Fluffles > Gentlemen, take your time. Firbolgs > Captain, we have signal. Captain Carrier > Main screen turn on! Captain Carrier cloaks Firbolgs > ._. C... Captain? Firbolgs > Someone set up us the bomb... Yes, I realise I just completely and utterly butchered it, but come on - do you honestly expect fighters to work while you're cloaking and to magically be able to warp to whoever they're supposed to support without first locking onto their warp tunnel? If this is intended, it'll bring carriers to the front lines where they belong or at LEAST place carriers at SOME risk of being caught out. edit And here you have it, apparently it's regarded as an issue But then, could still be a stealth 'feature' until further notice. ---
Nemesis Factor Caldari Telanus' Reach	Posted - 2010.05.27 06:34:00 - [38] Edited by: Nemesis Factor on 27/05/2010 06:34:14 I have no issue with carriers losing control of drones when they cloak, I never even used this method because I assumed that's what would happen. What I DID do quite regularly is sit in a deep safe and delegate drones to my fleet members. I know deep safes are gone, but I wouldn't mind hopping around safes while delegating. If I have to let reds see my Thanny, I may as well sell it and make a buck off of losing my carrier. ==================== ~/~ Sultan of Buruni
Companion Trollin You are going too fast	Posted - 2010.05.27 09:07:00 - [39] Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Originally by: Abraxias Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Is that seriously your response to a question from a customer? You must be new here. I want a decent answer to a question from a paying customer, are these changes to carrier mechanics intentional or are they bugs. I'm just getting a little sick of ccp running there company like a team of college kids programming code in someone's basement. Employ some public relations staff. I love your rhetoric. If you're not happy, leave. ps: It sucks to want. ♥ Originally by: CCP Shadow Off-topic posts dealing with sexual orientation have been removed. Please keep this discussion on-topic. Thanks. -- Shadow
Meno Theaetetus Wildly Inappropriate Wildly Inappropriate.	Posted - 2010.05.27 10:14:00 - [40] Originally by: Companion Trollin Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Originally by: Abraxias Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Is that seriously your response to a question from a customer? You must be new here. I want a decent answer to a question from a paying customer, are these changes to carrier mechanics intentional or are they bugs. I'm just getting a little sick of ccp running there company like a team of college kids programming code in someone's basement. Employ some public relations staff. I love your rhetoric. If you're not happy, leave. ps: It sucks to want. I love your mom. ps: It wants to suck.

Dlardrageth ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance	Posted - 2010.05.27 11:19:00 - [41] Originally by: Windjammer [...] A side note: I do not need a staffer (CCP Atropos) from a company we pay money to making wiseass comments in the forums when a reasonable question is asked. Have a little respect for your customers. You aren't the only act in town. Respect for the individual customers? From a CCP dev? That's a new one... Maybe you should take up your issue with CCP's "Internal Affairs" divison, but hey, I can tell you the outcome already now - their logs will show nothing... IB4 CCP FanboiZ
Darwin Duck Nemesis Theory Talos Coalition	Posted - 2010.05.27 11:23:00 - [42] Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Originally by: CCP Atropos So you mean to say I can't give my invisible friend in the next state the $100 I owe him? Is that seriously your response to a question from a customer? And the problem is?
Grarr Dexx Amarr GK inc. Panda Team	Posted - 2010.05.27 11:27:00 - [43] Can't you just... Get outside forcefield, delegate fighters and then make them warp around with the person who has them? I don't see a problem here, infact its good that carriers now need to be a little bit more involved in order to get their drone support. ___
Lord EmBra	Posted - 2010.05.27 11:34:00 - [44] Edited by: Lord EmBra on 27/05/2010 11:34:39 it's listed as an issue here: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1324781
Intoagun Deshana Minmatar Sentinel Eradicators of Doom	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:10:00 - [45] Originally by: CCP Atropos So you mean to say I can't give my invisible friend in the next state the $100 I owe him? Atropos, all I can say right now is that I love you for this comment.
Baneken Gallente Aseveljet	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:19:00 - [46] Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Originally by: Abraxias Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Is that seriously your response to a question from a customer? You must be new here. I want a decent answer to a question from a paying customer, are these changes to carrier mechanics intentional or are they bugs. I'm just getting a little sick of ccp running there company like a team of college kids programming code in someone's basement. Employ some public relations staff. Yep, his definetly a first timer here. http://desusig.crumplecorn.com/sigs.html
Illwill Bill House of Tempers	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:24:00 - [47] The old "I didn't read patch notes and now my game is broken" troll, eh? Old troll is old. 1/10. Also, lol, you failed to read patch notes before clicking install. Additionally, it really infuriates me, when people use some pointless rant about signatures as a sig.
Ferdio Ricotez Gallente	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:34:00 - [48] Edited by: Ferdio Ricotez on 27/05/2010 17:34:21 Originally by: Captain Muscles Originally by: HeliosGal its in the patch notes, carriers now must expose themselves on grid and uncloaked to assign fighters. at internet spaceship perverts. Mommy, mommy, there's the man who jumped out of the bushes at the park and assigned fighters to me! You both made me giggle and trolled me well. I actually tried to search the patch notes for this change you describe. ------------------------------------- This space is reserved in case someone points out the change really is there and I can't search for crap. Be warned though, I have no qualms about employing the Chewbacca defense. ------------------------------------- Congratulations, you are now made immortal for all eternity in my signature. That, or until I see a newer citation I like. EDIT: Well, crap, it won't fit. Quote: Say something funny and claim this space!
Vossejongk Caldari Bendebeukers Green Rhino	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:39:00 - [49] Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Originally by: Abraxias Originally by: Meno Theaetetus Is that seriously your response to a question from a customer? You must be new here. Employ some public relations staff. Hell please no! PR people are the worst of their kind. All they do is say "They're working on it and I cannot give an ETA when it's done." Or: "As of this moment I have no further information". I love CCP because they (almost) always respond like CCP does.. mostly in a hilarious yet professional way :). ----------------------------------------------- EVE Gate: Originally by: Simeon Tor Soon you'll be saying "Eve has a client?"
Vaerah Vahrokha Minmatar Vahrokh Consulting	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:46:00 - [50] Hopefully the next "slipped feature" will be making impossible to make ships unprobable. - Auditing & consulting When looking for investors, please read http://tinyurl.com/n5ys4h + http://tinyurl.com/lrg4oz

Betty Coltrane	Posted - 2010.05.27 17:47:00 - [51] Paying customer alert!
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2010.05.27 18:04:00 - [52] Want to deploy the DPS a carrier can add to the party? Then commit the carrier. Don't want to commit the carrier? Then you don't get to deploy its DPS. Simple. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki
B0XXY Gallente Federal Navy Academy	Posted - 2010.05.27 18:07:00 - [53] Originally by: War Kitten Tell 'em Boxxy... Yep, he's trollin'
Donatella D'Tren Harbingers of Chaos Inc. Gentlemen's Club	Posted - 2010.05.27 18:09:00 - [54] Pity this is a known issue. Here's hoping it become a "feature"! Commit your carrier to the fight, you pansy.
Heimdallofasgard Strategic Insanity	Posted - 2010.05.27 18:20:00 - [55] It's a bug at the moment (link in previous posts) and it's not a change listed in the patch notes. HOWEVER, No problem with it becoming a feature myself... just have the fighters assigned to a person before they warp into battle and the fighters should follow. Also... I reckon the warp to within distance should have 250km and 500km ranges added... it'd expand the grids, and make large fleet warfare more interesting as you could have multiple fronts on a single overview... LAG CENTRAL but still... would be nice... SPEAKING OF LAG... anyone been in any major fleet battles since yesterday? how are the servers holding up? ------- I LIKE DEHYDRATED WATERRRR
Tomcat Gallente Navy of Xoc Wildly Inappropriate.	Posted - 2010.05.27 18:57:00 - [56] Originally by: Tippia Want to deploy the DPS a carrier can add to the party? Then commit the carrier. Don't want to commit the carrier? Then you don't get to deploy its DPS. Simple. A carrier is a warship designed with a primary mission of deploying and recovering aircraft (fighters), acting as a seagoing airbase. Aircraft (fighters) carriers thus allow a naval force to project air power worldwide without having to depend on local bases for staging aircraft operations. They have evolved from wooden vessels, used to deploy balloons, into nuclear powered warships that carry dozens of fixed and rotary wing aircraft. TL:DR Your trollin' or not very smart. Please re-size your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist
Zeba Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company	Posted - 2010.05.27 19:10:00 - [57] Edited by: Zeba on 27/05/2010 19:11:53 Originally by: Tomcat Originally by: Tippia Want to deploy the DPS a carrier can add to the party? Then commit the carrier. Don't want to commit the carrier? Then you don't get to deploy its DPS. Simple. A carrier is a warship designed with a primary mission of deploying and recovering aircraft (fighters), acting as a seagoing airbase. Aircraft (fighters) carriers thus allow a naval force to project air power worldwide without having to depend on local bases for staging aircraft operations. They have evolved from wooden vessels, used to deploy balloons, into nuclear powered warships that carry dozens of fixed and rotary wing aircraft. TL:DR Your trollin' or not very smart. zomg did you just use a rl naval example to justify bashing a game mechanic change in a game that has nothing to do with the way a rl wet water navy operates? The change is interesting and it will be fun to see how this plays out in future battles. Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Get off the forums and go kill someone!
Captain Megadeath	Posted - 2010.05.27 19:32:00 - [58] Originally by: Zeba zomg did you just use a rl naval example to justify bashing a game mechanic change in a game that has nothing to do with the way a rl wet water navy operates? The change is interesting and it will be fun to see how this plays out in future battles. His example is only half correct anyway. The Soviet Kiev class carriers and Russian Kuznetsov Carrier has nothing to do with projecting air power without the need for bases, but to defend its submarine fleet from surface attack and to provide some ASW capability (through rotary wing craft). Same goes for the British Invincible class carriers. He tried to be a smart arse and failed. Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails my name actually is short for catherine
Ranger 1 Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX	Posted - 2010.05.27 19:37:00 - [59] Originally by: Windjammer Edited by: Windjammer on 27/05/2010 02:40:31 If true, it'll be the same technique they used last patch to gut/nerf the Moros. Then a couple days after the release they slipped the addition into the patch notes. A side note: I do not need a staffer (CCP Atropos) from a company we pay money to making wiseass comments in the forums when a reasonable question is asked. Have a little respect for your customers. You aren't the only act in town. Windjammer Another side note: You seriously need to unbunch your panties. I think most folks would much rather CCP employees feel free to post on these forums in a relaxed, good natured way... and even be "allowed" to be sarcastic once in a while. It's far preferable to no interaction at all, or PR double talk. If I wanted that, I'd go to one of the many "other acts in town" that spew empty yet polite BS at their paying customers. Frankly, if you are that easily offended, you have indeed chosen the wrong game. ===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you.
Ghaylenty	Posted - 2010.05.27 19:39:00 - [60] Originally by: Windjammer Edited by: Windjammer on 27/05/2010 02:40:31[/ed A side note: I do not need a staffer (CCP Atropos) from a company we pay money to making wiseass comments in the forums when a reasonable question is asked. Have a little respect for your customers. You aren't the only act in town. Windjammer actually they are. go back to continuum if you're not happy with these internet spaceships. now your carrier actually has a semblance of balance when compared to subcaps. tough bullet to swallow i know but, trust me, some day soon you'll forget you ever had your i-win buttons and we'll all laugh at how stupid carriers used to be.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.