| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

BaliAgha
Sky Guard Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:57:00 -
[1]
Can someone please link me to the post/news feed having to deal with the new PLEX changes? I saw the update when starting up the client but I cannot find it anywhere on the main page or forums. --------- <center></center> --------- [SKYGM] Sky Guard Mercenaries |

EmoTears
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:58:00 -
[2]
Edited by: EmoTears on 09/07/2010 15:58:52 http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=776
here you are
|

Cebraio
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:58:00 -
[3]
<---- Dev Blog
First blog entry there: http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=776
|

Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 15:59:00 -
[4]
The Devblog. -------- All I want is a better mankind.
|

Bad Princess
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:01:00 -
[5]
/me starts training stupidly fast locking ships for ganking shuttles..........
muahahahahahahahahahaha
  
|

BaliAgha
Sky Guard Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:02:00 -
[6]
Thank you, all three of you. --------- <center></center> --------- [SKYGM] Sky Guard Mercenaries |

Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:09:00 -
[7]
Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
Item DB | Sigs
|

Devil tiger
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:21:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Devil tiger on 09/07/2010 16:21:21
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
Which is what they deserve for being dumb as a brick by moving them in-game instead of redeeming them at location and thus avoiding any and all chances of being a victim of space piracy. 
|

Zofe Stormcaller
Shadow Company Legiunea ROmana
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:23:00 -
[9]
The first time someone gets ganked with a plex in the cargohold I want to see the killmail, and the impending forum thread of RRRRAAAAGGE and QQ.
|

siC0 b0b
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:26:00 -
[10]
Suprising how much an item, that's worth mere 300 milion ISK is suddenly pursuded as worthwhile to quit the game over.
|

Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:28:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Zofe Stormcaller The first time someone gets ganked with a plex in the cargohold I want to see the killmail, and the impending forum thread of RRRRAAAAGGE and QQ.
It'll be someone investing less than 300mil for some prestige points using one of his alts. -------- All I want is a better mankind.
|

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:32:00 -
[12]
Originally by: siC0 b0b Edited by: siC0 b0b on 09/07/2010 16:28:00 Suprising how much an item, that's worth mere 300 milion ISK is suddenly pursuded as worthwhile to quit the game over.
If you buy one to sell and lose it it's more a loss of real life money. I lose my ship, that's a loss of ISK, but if I paid 5 bucks for it irl there'd be more tears I think.
I'm wondering too why on earth they bother. Is it really that vital to have the ability to transport them considering the risks? Not just in losing the plex, but also the chance for it to be destroyed completely.
|

Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:34:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Devil tiger Edited by: Devil tiger on 09/07/2010 16:21:21
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
Which is what they deserve for being dumb as a brick by moving them in-game instead of redeeming them at location and thus avoiding any and all chances of being a victim of space piracy. 
Of course Just saying.
Item DB | Sigs
|

Aqriue
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:35:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
|

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:40:00 -
[15]
*makes a note to transport plexes in his 100k ehp dominix.*
|

Larkonis Trassler
EMIX INC
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:43:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Aqriue
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
Nobody is forcing you to undock with PLEXs in your hold.
|

Steve Celeste
Caldari Inglorious-Basterds
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:43:00 -
[17]
Best change ever.
|

Hanneshannes
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:44:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Aqriue
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
I too think this is going a little too far. Yes, Eve is supposed to be dark and evil but it is a game after all. Tbh, I think the horrors started with the introduction of PLEXs. They should get rid of them any return to good old 2 months GTCs.
|

Isolationist Cypher
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:45:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Aqriue
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
Just a heads up to those of you unable to comprehend this part....You are not *required* to transport a plex anywhere. If you don't want to risk it then go to the station you want to sell it at, and redeem it there. Vice versa, if you want to buy a plex for an alt....move the alt to the station, just like you always have. Nothing changes unless you want it to, the prices perhaps, but not your level of risk unless you CHOOSE to increase it.
|

siC0 b0b
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 16:46:00 -
[20]
Edited by: siC0 b0b on 09/07/2010 16:47:27
Originally by: Aqriue You fail.
That is beyond fail actually. If you have a bilion ISK in game, then it costed you time you could've spent making money IRL, any 300 milion ISK lost in game is just as valuable as losing a PLEX. Beside this you can't simply buy a PLEX, it's just a way of gaining ingame currency legaly out of a GTC. So if you lose a PLEX it's exactly the same as if you've lost 2 Ishtars. It's just annother form of ingame currency.
|

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:08:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Isolationist Cypher Just a heads up to those of you unable to comprehend this part....You are not *required* to transport a plex anywhere. If you don't want to risk it then go to the station you want to sell it at, and redeem it there. Vice versa, if you want to buy a plex for an alt....move the alt to the station, just like you always have. Nothing changes unless you want it to, the prices perhaps, but not your level of risk unless you CHOOSE to increase it.
Is there any good reason to do so though? To actually move it as opposed to just redeem it in the station you want to sell in?
I'm not sure why they would change it. It's not like any other item, CCP: no other item lets you pay your monthly sub fees with it.
|

putopugno
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:11:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Aqriue
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
Until CCP reports you for fraud, your account is perma banned and the local police force investigates and finds one stupid player who didn't read the terms and conditions.
|

Queen Alma
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:29:00 -
[23]
I think this is a good change, opening some new possibilities. Imagine you're ratting and one of the rats drops a PLEX. How cool is that? 
|

Lance Fighter
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:34:00 -
[24]
i dont get it. People lose ships worth 300m very often.
Why do people not QQ over those losses as much? I mean, sure, 'first' t3 loss or similar, but honestly, when you all the sudden assume a real life money value on an item, it becomes worth crying over?
my pilgrim, worth about 6 usd died last night. I then spent another 5 or 6usd on a replacement. I regularly undock in my abaddon, currently worth about 10 usd in faction fittings to run missions. I often station camp in my archon, and current prices place that at around 40 dollars. 50 DOLLARS. SRSLY.
Remind me again why people rage over plex?
(note, all numbers pulled more or less out of my ass, assuming about 100m isk = 5 dollars. )
Originally by: CCP Shadow Have you ever wished you could have prevented a train wreck before it actually happened? I need to stop this one before the craziness begins.
|

Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:36:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Lance Fighter i dont get it. People lose ships worth 300m very often.
Why do people not QQ over those losses as much? I mean, sure, 'first' t3 loss or similar, but honestly, when you all the sudden assume a real life money value on an item, it becomes worth crying over?
my pilgrim, worth about 6 usd died last night. I then spent another 5 or 6usd on a replacement. I regularly undock in my abaddon, currently worth about 10 usd in faction fittings to run missions. I often station camp in my archon, and current prices place that at around 40 dollars. 50 DOLLARS. SRSLY.
Remind me again why people rage over plex?
(note, all numbers pulled more or less out of my ass, assuming about 100m isk = 5 dollars. )
Ships cannot be used for actual play time. PLEXes can. And that's the difference.
Item DB | Sigs
|

Larkonis Trassler
EMIX INC
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:37:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Dan O'Connor
Originally by: Lance Fighter i dont get it. People lose ships worth 300m very often.
Why do people not QQ over those losses as much? I mean, sure, 'first' t3 loss or similar, but honestly, when you all the sudden assume a real life money value on an item, it becomes worth crying over?
my pilgrim, worth about 6 usd died last night. I then spent another 5 or 6usd on a replacement. I regularly undock in my abaddon, currently worth about 10 usd in faction fittings to run missions. I often station camp in my archon, and current prices place that at around 40 dollars. 50 DOLLARS. SRSLY.
Remind me again why people rage over plex?
(note, all numbers pulled more or less out of my ass, assuming about 100m isk = 5 dollars. )
Ships cannot be used for actual play time. PLEXes can. And that's the difference.
Yes they can... Sell ships, buy PLEX.
Simples.
|

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:42:00 -
[27]
This is wrong IMHO, This allows another player to directly STEAL my CASH PAID FOR item if i should chose to purchase a plex with cash. I'm sorry but CCP has absolutely no right to allow another gamer to directly affect/steal my RL money that I spent on a PLEX. I would even propose that IF a plex is dropped, To take it or destroy it might possibly a violation of the EULA. Specifically the subject of THEFT, even though it happens in game, As it affects an item purchased with Real Life cash, it may be subject to the terms in
http://www.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp
Specifically rule #7
Quote: You may not violate any local, state, national or international laws or regulations.
Destruction/theft of property in most states and most of the civilized world is considered a violation of law. In most states, I do believe there is a legal distinction between virtual and physical item possession, however the same laws apply concerning the destruction/theft of items virtual or physical.
Since cash was paid for said item, any sort of claims that "it is just a game" do not apply
Since a PLEX is purchased in a lot of cases with CASH, the allowance of CCP games to allow the theft and/or destruction of property paid for with CASH opens them to litigation in most western countries that follow similar legal structures.
In Short, CCP allows a game mechanic that can financially damage me in the case of destroyed/stolen items that were purchased with cash.
This rule definitely conflicts with the rest of the game because the destruction of other property in the game is NOT PURCHASED with RL money. I pay $15 a month but I don't lose my game time if someone blows up my ship and it drops a bunch of modules. With the new change in rules I would lose that $15 with the destruction/theft of the plex.
This is UNACCEPTABLE
I can see this change of rules being allowed with PLEX being purchased with ingame isk but not PLEX being purchased with CASH
|

Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:48:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom This is wrong IMHO, This allows another player to directly STEAL my CASH PAID FOR item if i should chose to purchase a plex with cash. I'm sorry but CCP has absolutely no right to allow another gamer to directly affect/steal my RL money that I spent on a PLEX. I would even propose that IF a plex is dropped, To take it or destroy it might possibly a violation of the EULA. Specifically the subject of THEFT, even though it happens in game, As it affects an item purchased with Real Life cash, it may be subject to the terms in
http://www.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp
Specifically rule #7
Quote: You may not violate any local, state, national or international laws or regulations.
Destruction/theft of property in most states and most of the civilized world is considered a violation of law. In most states, I do believe there is a legal distinction between virtual and physical item possession, however the same laws apply concerning the destruction/theft of items virtual or physical.
Since cash was paid for said item, any sort of claims that "it is just a game" do not apply
Since a PLEX is purchased in a lot of cases with CASH, the allowance of CCP games to allow the theft and/or destruction of property paid for with CASH opens them to litigation in most western countries that follow similar legal structures.
In Short, CCP allows a game mechanic that can financially damage me in the case of destroyed/stolen items that were purchased with cash.
This rule definitely conflicts with the rest of the game because the destruction of other property in the game is NOT PURCHASED with RL money. I pay $15 a month but I don't lose my game time if someone blows up my ship and it drops a bunch of modules. With the new change in rules I would lose that $15 with the destruction/theft of the plex.
This is UNACCEPTABLE
I can see this change of rules being allowed with PLEX being purchased with ingame isk but not PLEX being purchased with CASH
...except that you buy the code FOR the PLEX with cash, not the PLEX itself.
It still is a pretty stupid idea of CCP (never thought I'd say that)
Item DB | Sigs
|

Siigari Kitawa
Gallente Luxury Exports The Honda Accord
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:50:00 -
[29]
Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 09/07/2010 17:50:48 You guys are a bunch of short-sighted whiners.
Check it out. You have a PLEX you want to sell. You want to sell it in X station. Instead of putting it in your cargo, LEAVE IT IN YOUR REDEEM ITEMS BOX (or convert it there or whatever) and then once you arrive to the destination get it out. Easy peasy.
|

Bernard Schuyler
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:52:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Ori Blake
Originally by: Isolationist Cypher Just a heads up to those of you unable to comprehend this part....You are not *required* to transport a plex anywhere. If you don't want to risk it then go to the station you want to sell it at, and redeem it there. Vice versa, if you want to buy a plex for an alt....move the alt to the station, just like you always have. Nothing changes unless you want it to, the prices perhaps, but not your level of risk unless you CHOOSE to increase it.
Is there any good reason to do so though? To actually move it as opposed to just redeem it in the station you want to sell in?
I'm not sure why they would change it. It's not like any other item, CCP: no other item lets you pay your monthly sub fees with it.
The same reason to move anything. Sell Order value in Station X is < Buy Order value in Station Y. Buy Low, Sell High.
Other than that, can't imagine any reasonable reason.
|

Larkonis Trassler
EMIX INC
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:53:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 09/07/2010 17:50:48 You guys are a bunch of short-sighted whiners.
Check it out. You have a PLEX you want to sell. You want to sell it in X station. Instead of putting it in your cargo, LEAVE IT IN YOUR REDEEM ITEMS BOX (or convert it there or whatever) and then once you arrive to the destination get it out. Easy peasy.
Hey Siig, talking of redeem items boxes, still waiting on that 2 bil to show up in mine.
|

Elsymir Crystalblood
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 17:57:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom This allows another player to directly STEAL my ... item
Not sure if this is a troll (probably, oh well), but I'll bite:
The most core assumption about your argument? That you own the PLEX? Especially since you paid cash for it? Yeah that one.
It's wrong.
You surrender your $40 in order to have access to two PLEXes, nothing more. The EULA of most MMOs clearly lays out that all content in the game itself is expressly owned by the game developer (here, CCP), and, essentially, that you are just "renting" any property, digital or otherwise, that you acquire while playing the game.
PLEXes are no different. As a digital item in CCP's game, they are expressly owned by CCP. You gave them $40 to rent those PLEXes, but in doing so surrendered to their terms and conditions of rental - which, come the thirteenth, will include the possibility of spontaneously losing those PLEXes as a result of player actions should you choose to leave a station while carrying PLEXes in your cargohold.
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with what you're paying for before paying for it.
|

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:01:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Dan O'Connor
...except that you buy the code FOR the PLEX with cash, not the PLEX itself.
It doesn't matter. The fact is that cash could be spent with the expectation that it would be applied toward my game time or whatever other reason I decide to use it for. That item, should it be destroyed or stolen is still an item that could be purchased for cash.
If I pay CASH for something, CCP should NOT introduce a game mechanic that allows theft or financial damage to me. It's that simple. Stealing a PLEX paid for with cash is on par with character theft IMHO. It's the same because in both cases CASH was spent on creating/maintaining my character. Character theft is illegal. So should PLEX theft be.
ANY ITEM anyone legally purchase in game should not be exposed to this game mechanic, no matter if there is a code or not.
|

Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:02:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Dan O'Connor
...except that you buy the code FOR the PLEX with cash, not the PLEX itself.
It doesn't matter. The fact is that cash could be spent with the expectation that it would be applied toward my game time or whatever other reason I decide to use it for. That item, should it be destroyed or stolen is still an item that could be purchased for cash.
If I pay CASH for something, CCP should NOT introduce a game mechanic that allows theft or financial damage to me. It's that simple. Stealing a PLEX paid for with cash is on par with character theft IMHO. It's the same because in both cases CASH was spent on creating/maintaining my character. Character theft is illegal. So should PLEX theft be.
ANY ITEM anyone legally purchase in game should not be exposed to this game mechanic, no matter if there is a code or not.
Don't get me wrong - I agree with you.
Problem is that you pay for the code, not the PLEX... and that technically you don't own any items, CCP only lets you "rent" everything on TQ (for lack of a better word: play around with it)
Item DB | Sigs
|

Sakrak
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:05:00 -
[35]
I think this topic just shows that Eve players will whine about anything. CCP is giving another option, that is it. You still have your 100% safe way of doing things. To those that think a PLEX = Real Money. if a PLEX is money, what happens when you sell it for ISK? Does ISK = money then? If a = b, and b = c, then a = c. Does this mean that any item that is bought with ISK derived from a PLEX should not be able to be destroyed?
|

Messoroz
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:06:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Dan O'Connor
...except that you buy the code FOR the PLEX with cash, not the PLEX itself.
It doesn't matter. The fact is that cash could be spent with the expectation that it would be applied toward my game time or whatever other reason I decide to use it for. That item, should it be destroyed or stolen is still an item that could be purchased for cash.
If I pay CASH for something, CCP should NOT introduce a game mechanic that allows theft or financial damage to me. It's that simple. Stealing a PLEX paid for with cash is on par with character theft IMHO. It's the same because in both cases CASH was spent on creating/maintaining my character. Character theft is illegal. So should PLEX theft be.
ANY ITEM anyone legally purchase in game should not be exposed to this game mechanic, no matter if there is a code or not.
It's this simple, CCP is ADDING to the current Plex mechanics. The existing ones work 100% and your plex is fine unless you're dumb as **** and get scammed. Otherwise there is no reason for you to need to take advantage of thesee ADDED game mechanics.
|

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:06:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Elsymir Crystalblood
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with what you're paying for before paying for it.
Personally I don't use PLEX to maintain my characters. I pay once a year in cash so I won't be pulling around the PLEX in my cargohold. It's just the issue that no matter how you chose to look at it and no matter what kind of legal argument anyone can pose, To pay extra for something and to have it stolen/destroyed is wrong. CCP knows this i should hope.
|

Sneaky Neko
Echoes of Reality
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:07:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Sneaky Neko on 09/07/2010 18:07:59 Well, if you think PLEXs are so valuable lets make a deal. I'll give you a very valuable PLEX worth REAL LIFE MONEY in return for a measly freighter BPO.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:14:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Zofe Stormcaller The first time someone gets ganked with a plex in the cargohold I want to see the killmail, and the impending forum thread of RRRRAAAAGGE and QQ.
I want to buy the actual tears on ebay.
PLex-o-gheddon.
The dark harsh sandbox just got darker and harsher. This is clearly a signature. |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:14:00 -
[40]
Quote: Are you crazy? Do you know how many people will emoragequit when they're ganked with PLEX in their cargo?
Maybe we're a little crazy, yes, but we truly think the benefits outweigh the risks here. One of them is to combat the perception that PLEX is a more valuable item than others in the game which, of course, it isn't (anyone who has lost a titan/carrier/T2 BS/etc knows this full well). Among the risks of course is that people will start losing PLEXs' en masse and cancel their subscriptions. We will be monitoring that extremely closely as well as all other aspects of PLEX trade/usage patterns. Remember, we're not forcing anyone to undock with PLEX, in fact we're making things a little bit safer (if people choose to use the option) by allowing redeeming of PLEX to all stations instead of just NPC stations. The choice and risk is always at the discretion of the player, just like it should be.
TL;DR
if you undock with a plex, make sure your in a tanked ship.
Also if you lose a plex in a gank, too bad, people have lost more isk in a gank than your pittiful little gank.
See reference Shrike Goonswarm Pandemic Legion Morsus Mihi The great Heist The E-bank Theft Ginger Magician Any freighter ganked in Uedama.
|

Aldor Fisax
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:15:00 -
[41]
The problem here is that a few people feel that you own a PLEX when you buy it. That is not true. You rarely own anything on your computer except the hardware. If you notice, EULA's are End User Licensing Agreements, not End User Ownership Agreements. While courts continue to debate if you own or license software, at present, you license it. As such, anything you purchase is generally partially-owned by the originating company, and your license can be terminated by clauses stipulated in the agreement.
Now, the other thing people have a problem with is that if a player pwns you and destroys or loots your PLEX, you feel that you just got robbed of real money. However, in general, you're paying $X dollars per month. You spend most of your time in game, (which is what you have purchased) missioning and lets say you earn 100 million isk over that month time. Now, you use that isk to buy a BS and fittings. Effectively, you've turned $X into 1 BS with fittings. Now you're BS gets pwned. Why is this not stealing of real money. Just because it took more steps shouldn't change the equation. (I don't think it is just to clarify).
Further, people get perma-banned in games all the time. You played said game for several months paying dollars per month, only to have your account permanently banned (and possibly destroyed). In effect, all the money you put into the game has been lost. And this doesn't even to begin to talk about games that use a micro-payment system, where the items and such you buy with micro-payments can be lost.
So basically, the tl;dr version is it is not stealing or destruction of real property, and it's withing CCP's rights (and has been done by other games) to allow this.
|

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:16:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Sakrak I think this topic just shows that Eve players will whine about anything. CCP is giving another option, that is it. You still have your 100% safe way of doing things. To those that think a PLEX = Real Money. if a PLEX is money, what happens when you sell it for ISK? Does ISK = money then? If a = b, and b = c, then a = c. Does this mean that any item that is bought with ISK derived from a PLEX should not be able to be destroyed?
They shouldn't be destroyed or looted because:
1. They are the only item in the game you DIRECTLY pay for in real money. 2. They are the only item in the game that DIRECTLY gives subscription time.
All other items are one stage off from that, and I think too many people here are looking at it from the PLEX buyer side. That side I can't see them needing to transport it at all as opposed to redeeming it on the spot. To them it is just ISK, but to the sellers, it's a real money cost, and a direct one. For them if they lose it its a direct loss in real world assets to replace it. For a buyer they just grind more missions.
It's moot though I think because no sane seller is going to transport them, and CCP introduces yet another "feature" it makes little sense to use.
|

Riedle
Minmatar Origin. Black Legion.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:16:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Elsymir Crystalblood
Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with what you're paying for before paying for it.
Personally I don't use PLEX to maintain my characters. I pay once a year in cash so I won't be pulling around the PLEX in my cargohold. It's just the issue that no matter how you chose to look at it and no matter what kind of legal argument anyone can pose, To pay extra for something and to have it stolen/destroyed is wrong. CCP knows this i should hope.
Deos the fact that your argument is illogical make any difference? Say I sell plex and immediately buy a T3 and said T3 done get blowed up - is that wrong too? Your arguments says that it is - yet seemingly you don't rage about that.
Try to understand something first before you come out an whine about it. Especially something that you say will not affect you.
|

Maria Yumeno
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:20:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Maria Yumeno on 09/07/2010 18:25:27
Originally by: Lance Fighter i dont get it. People lose ships worth 300m very often.
Remind me again why people rage over plex?
(note, all numbers pulled more or less out of my ass, assuming about 100m isk = 5 dollars. )
I edited the quote, hope it's ok.
It's different 'cos its the only in game item that you can directly relate to rl money (in that you buy a plex you save $15)
Plexs become destroyable, stupid people will get them destroyed reducing circulation, increasing plex value and suddenly that 1bn isk tengu is worth 1mo game time.
The only thing that keeps them 'just like any other item' at the moment is the fact that they can't be destroyed.
Edit for clarification
This issue shouldn't affect single players, it's not a matter of o gods no....i lost my plex!! wtf!!! that is real money! It's more an issue of a real amount of dollars was put into the system and now ccp are able to remove that amount of real dollars from the system. I'm not going to start comparing it with real life financail systems for fears of getting falmed, however seeing as the plex market requires a real money investment it is the most subtible thing that we could use to make comparisons.
TLDR; CCP destory one plex, they get a free $15 with no obligations
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:20:00 -
[45]
lets not forget that plex is till 100% secure and cannot be taken from you if you choose it not to be. 100% secure.
You literally have to give it to someone. This is clearly a signature. |

Ghaylenty
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:26:00 -
[46]
using plexes to trade is infact what CCP wishes to accomplish with this, so that more people buy them so they can buy their nice fancy faction CNR, carrier, or other carebearmobile.
there has to be a system of checks and balances. if it is now easier to trade plexes for items, it must now be harder to trade the plex itself. the rule change works on a law of averages -- there are people out there who are dumb as a brick (is that you by chance?) who WILL lose their PLEX in a gank because they lack foresight. CCP is infact counting on this, because it allows them to create free revenue. They gain your money, while giving you nothing.
If you are stupid enough to let that happen to you, then you deserve it. Really, you do. Welcome to EVE i actually fly amarr |

Bankoff DarkFusion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:26:00 -
[47]
Stupid stupid idea. Players who join after this rule change will not know the history and will blithely take off with plex in hold to get the best price. Cheating CCP in the aftermath of a plex loss will be relatively easy Credit card companies will reverse charges in many cases since the amount is small if customer is convincing. Fraud investigation? Not likely given the amount. What's the point of this change? Not enough tears in the game now? Not driving away the new players fast enough?
I'm not stupid enough to undock with plex in hold and don't need this change anyway.
Argue with this any way you want, trot out the dark universe excuse again. Doesn't matter. Sure, nobody has to undock with a plex but that's not the point. CCP has just announced open season on player cash. When you announce to people that you plan to take their money and give them nothing for it, you are being about as stupid as a company can be.
Fine distinctions between time code and plex won't help in this case. Perception is everything. People will not accept this no matter how much sense it makes from the perspective of the game.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:33:00 -
[48]
I read that last post and the potential for profit will be, astronomical to say the least.
You could make a kings ransom in a covert ops ship. This is clearly a signature. |

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:33:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Riedle
Deos the fact that your argument is illogical make any difference? Say I sell plex and immediately buy a T3 and said T3 done get blowed up - is that wrong too? Your arguments says that it is - yet seemingly you don't rage about that.
Try to understand something first before you come out an whine about it. Especially something that you say will not affect you.
No You are expounding on my original argument and putting hypotheticals on a specific situation. As Ori Blake said, Everything else is a one off. Top level only concerns me.
Once the plex is redeemed, it is gone. Whatever else happens with the proceeds ,whether its isk profit from sale or a 30 day player extension, it is susceptible to the accepted game mechanics. That doesn't bother me. I don't have a single problem with losing a 300M isk ship should I sell a plex. It's the fact that having the CASH paid for plex stolen it before redeeming/selling it. THATS what I have a problem with. whatever is done AFTER I get my CASH value from it matters not to me
|

Riedle
Minmatar Origin. Black Legion.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:38:00 -
[50]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Riedle
Deos the fact that your argument is illogical make any difference? Say I sell plex and immediately buy a T3 and said T3 done get blowed up - is that wrong too? Your arguments says that it is - yet seemingly you don't rage about that.
Try to understand something first before you come out an whine about it. Especially something that you say will not affect you.
No You are expounding on my original argument and putting hypotheticals on a specific situation. As Ori Blake said, Everything else is a one off. Top level only concerns me.
Once the plex is redeemed, it is gone. Whatever else happens with the proceeds ,whether its isk profit from sale or a 30 day player extension, it is susceptible to the accepted game mechanics. That doesn't bother me. I don't have a single problem with losing a 300M isk ship should I sell a plex. It's the fact that having the CASH paid for plex stolen it before redeeming/selling it. THATS what I have a problem with. whatever is done AFTER I get my CASH value from it matters not to me
But the plex is an ingame item just like the ship. 300 million isk in a raven or in a plex is the same exact value. The format they are in-game matters not. Engage the left side of your brain.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:39:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Riedle
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Riedle
Deos the fact that your argument is illogical make any difference? Say I sell plex and immediately buy a T3 and said T3 done get blowed up - is that wrong too? Your arguments says that it is - yet seemingly you don't rage about that.
Try to understand something first before you come out an whine about it. Especially something that you say will not affect you.
No You are expounding on my original argument and putting hypotheticals on a specific situation. As Ori Blake said, Everything else is a one off. Top level only concerns me.
Once the plex is redeemed, it is gone. Whatever else happens with the proceeds ,whether its isk profit from sale or a 30 day player extension, it is susceptible to the accepted game mechanics. That doesn't bother me. I don't have a single problem with losing a 300M isk ship should I sell a plex. It's the fact that having the CASH paid for plex stolen it before redeeming/selling it. THATS what I have a problem with. whatever is done AFTER I get my CASH value from it matters not to me
But the plex is an ingame item just like the ship. 300 million isk in a raven or in a plex is the same exact value. The format they are in-game matters not. Engage the left side of your brain.
Again I bring up the point that its still 100% secure. This is clearly a signature. |

Barkaial Starfinder
Minmatar The Kairos Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:50:00 -
[52]
We all knew some people would cry. CCP knew.
They will probably not take that back because you just leave with a PLEX on cargo if you want to.
All I can see is that they might give you a warning message about leaving station with it. Get over it.
|

Aldor Fisax
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:55:00 -
[53]
Let us change the word PLEX to CNR for sake of argument. So CCP allows you to buy a fully T2 fitted CNR for $X. You're like sweet, and do it, fly out of the station and it gets WTF PWNED right away. Are you going to say you just got robbed?
|

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 18:56:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Riedle \
But the plex is an ingame item just like the ship. 300 million isk in a raven or in a plex is the same exact value. The format they are in-game matters not. Engage the left side of your brain.
It's the RL money spent on the PLEX. In-Game format means EVERYTHING! I can use 300M isk spent in ingame, that doesnt bother me. It's losing the 300m that I basically spent RL cash on thats the issue.
If I buy a plex for cash and sell it in game for 300M isk, buy a ship and get it blowed up, thats not a problem to me. I spent the money and got the proceeds and spent them. Whatever happens after that is GAME ON!. That dont bother me a bit.
When i spend cash and do NOT see the proceeds from that cash purchase, I tend to have an issue.
If you can't understand that then i dont know what else to tell you. Thats the simplest I can make it.
Isk earned INGAME through mining and such does NOT hold the same value to me as ISK I spent cash on and recieved through plex sales.
I could make a TRILLION isk in game with mining/PVE/Market or whatever and that isk is only worth $15 to me, as I only spend $15 a month membership. But if I spend $40 on a 2 month plex, lose one or both of them though theft or destruction before getting my value from them, Thats 600M isk that is worth RL $40 to me. It's a different value dynamic on ingame isk VS purchased isk.
|

Barkaial Starfinder
Minmatar The Kairos Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:01:00 -
[55]
If you decide to leave station with a PLEX you are gambling in a game. You can still use it safely if you will.
If you go to a casino and put your money on a game, you might lose it.
|

Aldor Fisax
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:02:00 -
[56]
I think Barkaial makes a good point. But further, you argue as if you didn't get your value. You already got what you paid for. They gave you your PLEX. What happens after that is subject to the EULA and T&A just like every other item in game. Again, I postulate that if the PLEX was instead a CNR that you were paying for (real $) and it got blown up right away, would you still be mad?
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:02:00 -
[57]
What's the big deal? So many ships bought for rl money via GTC trades are being destroyed every day. 300 mil ISK is 300 mil ISK, it doesn't really matter where you throw it - to PLEX, ship or whatever.
GJ CCP
|

War Kitten
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:03:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Ori Blake
I agree its not real world theft due to EULA and licensing, but it's a generally stupid decision to add a feature that gives absolutely no benefit to an item you pay real money for while adding a ton of risk if you use the feature. Thankfully in this case you can just not transport them, so the end result wont be that harmful. But I have to ask why CCP cares so much about this when they could be fixing stuff that matters.
Just because you fail to see the benefit added does not make it a stupid decision.
And seriously, you think the people that made this decision have anything to do with fixing stuff? Yeah, I wish accounting and marketing and upper level management were working on bugs in our computer system too. Because THAT would help...
"Here's your sign." - Bill Engvall |

Melkath Bandrom
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:04:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Again I bring up the point that its still 100% secure.
I don't think it is, why would they allow PLEX to drop if it were secure? I'm betting whoever picks it up can redeem/sell it as any other loot. It may be secure in that they wont get my personal or financial RL info, but nothing else
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:06:00 -
[60]
YOU GUYS DO KNOW THAT YOU CAN APPLY A PLEX FROM ANYWHERE IN THE GALAXY AS LONG AS IT IS IN ANY OF YOUR STATION HANGARS, RIGHT ?!? AND THAT YOU CAN REDEEM A FRESHLY CASH-PURCHASED PLEX TO ANY STATION AT ANY TIME, YOU DON'T HAVE TO REDEEM IT WHERE YOU ARE NOW ?!? Or that you can also sell it to or buy it from somebody else anywhere in the galaxy as long as you use a PRIVATE (as opposed to public) contract ?!?
If you're reckless enough to move your PLEX around ESPECIALLY when there's very little need to do so, you're also accepting the possibility of a loss. The only people that NEED to move a PLEX are inter-station market traders, and for them losing a PLEX is no better nor worse than losing any other item worth about 300 mil ISK at this time.
PLEXes might be the closest thing to RL cash in EVE, but they're still just another in-game item, and should receive no special treatment. Also, more PLEX destroyed = more potential cash in the future for CCP. And that is a GOOD thing for all of us.
TL;DR : this change is made out of the letters W, I and N.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:09:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Again I bring up the point that its still 100% secure.
I don't think it is, why would they allow PLEX to drop if it were secure? I'm betting whoever picks it up can redeem/sell it as any other loot. It may be secure in that they wont get my personal or financial RL info, but nothing else
Its secure because you do not have to undock to use it. You simply cannot be jacked for your plex unless you put it in your ship and fly with it. This is clearly a signature. |

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:10:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Akita T
YOU GUYS DO KNOW THAT YOU CAN APPLY A PLEX FROM ANYWHERE IN THE GALAXY AS LONG AS IT IS IN ANY OF YOUR STATION HANGARS, RIGHT ?!? AND THAT YOU CAN REDEEM A FRESHLY CASH-PURCHASED PLEX TO ANY STATION AT ANY TIME, YOU DON'T HAVE TO REDEEM IT WHERE YOU ARE NOW ?!? Or that you can also sell it to or buy it from somebody else anywhere in the galaxy as long as you use a PRIVATE (as opposed to public) contract ?!?
If you're reckless enough to move your PLEX around ESPECIALLY when there's very little need to do so, you're also accepting the possibility of a loss. The only people that NEED to move a PLEX are inter-station market traders, and for them losing a PLEX is no better nor worse than losing any other item worth about 300 mil ISK at this time.
PLEXes might be the closest thing to RL cash in EVE, but they're still just another in-game item, and should receive no special treatment. Also, more PLEX destroyed = more potential cash in the future for CCP. And that is a GOOD thing for all of us.
TL;DR : this change is made out of the letters W, I and N.
YES WE KNOW, BUT ITS STUPID TO MAKE A CHANGE WITH NO BENEFIT AND DESIGNED TO DESTROY ITEMS YOU DIRECTLY PAY REAL MONEY FOR.
Jesus Akita, I think you would have more sense. CCP should not be in an adversarial position or making money off of us by counting on players to act stupid and put themselves into situations like that. Even the worst F2P game doesn't do that.
Best case is people ignore the ability to transport it. Worst case is transporting it and losing it, and there is no guarantee the person is going to buy another every again. FFS its hard enough to get people to take risk in this game that you want to make them risk real money?
|

democrities
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:10:00 -
[63]
Do you think this will increase the value of plex?
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:11:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom Isk earned INGAME through mining and such does NOT hold the same value to me as ISK I spent cash on and recieved through plex sales. I could make a TRILLION isk in game with mining/PVE/Market or whatever and that isk is only worth $15 to me, as I only spend $15 a month membership. But if I spend $40 on a 2 month plex, lose one or both of them though theft or destruction before getting my value from them, Thats 600M isk that is worth RL $40 to me. It's a different value dynamic on ingame isk VS purchased isk, even though there is no technical difference.
Irrational. Absurd. Naive. Unrealistic. Impractical. Emotion-laden nonsense. Too bad a lot of other people feel the same way you do. I want to beat the crap out of all of you (ingame) for thinking like that. But barring that, I'll settle for a killmail with a PLEX on it.
 _
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:15:00 -
[65]
Hello folks.
The major difference between a PLEX and every other item ingame is that a PLEX can not created by an ingame activity. Every other item can somehow be created by things you do ingame. A destruction of a capital fleet has no impact on real life (except for some tears). A destruction of a single PLEX does have an impact on the real world in the form that CCP now does not have to provide that 30 days of gametime.
Elgaris.
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:19:00 -
[66]
Originally by: democrities Do you think this will increase the value of plex?
This is the only thing I really care about here.
|

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:22:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor The major difference between a PLEX and every other item ingame is that a PLEX can not created by an ingame activity. Every other item can somehow be created by things you do ingame. A destruction of a capital fleet has no impact on real life (except for some tears). A destruction of a single PLEX does have an impact on the real world in the form that CCP now does not have to provide that 30 days of gametime.
The only GOOD reason for a PLEX to be moved by ship is if you purchased it from the market/contracts and want to sell it on the market/contracts in another station. As such, it is for all practical intents and purposes just another in-game item.
There are MORE than enough safeguards//options in place so that the person that actually purchased the PLEX using RL cash never really HAS to move the PLEX by ship anywhere, as he can just "spawn" it in the in-game world at any station of his choosing with minimal effort.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:23:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Melkath Bandrom Isk earned INGAME through mining and such does NOT hold the same value to me as ISK I spent cash on and recieved through plex sales. I could make a TRILLION isk in game with mining/PVE/Market or whatever and that isk is only worth $15 to me, as I only spend $15 a month membership. But if I spend $40 on a 2 month plex, lose one or both of them though theft or destruction before getting my value from them, Thats 600M isk that is worth RL $40 to me. It's a different value dynamic on ingame isk VS purchased isk, even though there is no technical difference.
Irrational. Absurd. Naive. Unrealistic. Impractical. Emotion-laden nonsense. Too bad a lot of other people feel the same way you do. I want to beat the crap out of all of you (ingame) for thinking like that. But barring that, I'll settle for a killmail with a PLEX on it.

No, you don't understand. Opportunity cost is an absraction, and a simplistic one. If he's mining with friends and playing the game, it's not just a simple comparison between isk per hour-playing the game and earning or losing ISK has other intangible benefits that cant always be qualified.
A PLEX though is a pure Real life money to ISK conversion. There is no intangible aspect to them that could qualify a loss. It's just converting currencies. So a loss of a PLEX is greater because all of the value is taken away: if I lose ISK mining with friends, I still have the memories and relationships.
Opportunity costs only matters when comparing two items solely for ISK generation. Many times something that has a higher Opportunity cost may actually be better because of the intangible benefits it gives, where something that has a lower one not many people do despite it being more lucrative.
It's a human issue of valuing multiple costs, not just ISK ones. ALso, if a person is ISK earning solo, its more similar, which is why so many solo players and missioners overreact when ninja salvaged or transport ganked-they have no intangible benefits.
|

greentusk
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:24:00 -
[69]
I am not against plexes being transportable but I am cynical to why this is being done. The only people who benefit from a plex being destroyed is CCP. There is absolutely zero reason for allowing plexes to be transported.
|

Bankoff DarkFusion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:24:00 -
[70]
You guys who are defending this idea are out of your mind. You want to beat people to a pulp because theyI think this is dumb? I'm failing Eve by not lining up to say how great CCP is? CCP asked for feedback. Giving it to them is not whining.
Destroying an item that has been bought for cash so that the purchased service is never rendered is fraud. CCP could easily be sued over at least part of this change. You think that's unlikely? Companies get sued for stupid reasons every day.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:30:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Bankoff DarkFusion You guys who are defending this idea are out of your mind. You want to beat people to a pulp because theyI think this is dumb? I'm failing Eve by not lining up to say how great CCP is? CCP asked for feedback. Giving it to them is not whining.
Destroying an item that has been bought for cash so that the purchased service is never rendered is fraud. CCP could easily be sued over at least part of this change. You think that's unlikely? Companies get sued for stupid reasons every day.
They give them the item and they give them the option to use the item 100% securely. They cannot be successfully sued over this.
And you aren't failing eve yet. When you undock with a plex and then get ganked you fail eve and have to take the $17.49 remedial course. This is clearly a signature. |

Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:32:00 -
[72]
If you buy a 35$ cigar in an air-tight package. Scenario A : you light it, then go take a shower after taking the first puff, when you come back the cigar burned itself out Scenario B : you open the seal, leave the cigar on your porch to go do something else for a while, a sudden rain comes over and ruins it, soaking it all wet and dragging it through the mud Scenario C : you keep the package in your pocket, and on your way home some thief picks your pocket and steals it ... you don't scream at the tobacco shop for not being able to use the cigar as you intended, do you ?
ONCE REDEEMED, PLEX are in-game items, and they should not be treated any different from any other items. BEFORE REDEEMING a PLEX, they are for all practical intents and purposes invulnerable. There are next to no logical reasons (and maybe just one convenience//laziness reason) for a person that PURCHASED a PLEX with RL-cash to ever put that PLEX in a position where it MIGHT become vulnerable.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|

Aqriue
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:33:00 -
[73]
Some people are correct in quoting me and I don't feel like wasting the limited character limit quoting them all. My biggest issue with CCP right now is their complete lack of direction and waste of resources. PLEX? Their biggest concern this week.
I can name several other issues that need a fix which would be more beneficial: The glut of NPC goods on the market. They left NPC orders as is for PI to catch up so POS didn't run out of fuel, instead of reducing the orders in anticipation to fill the vacuum left behind. There is still to much NPC goods left on the market from PC players making it a waste of time to put PI skills in the que right now.
Short Range T2 ammo types. Still trying to find a justification for the 10k rounds of Hail ammo I bought several months ago. Copy the stats of barrage and change the damage type to EM/Therm. Same for Hybrid and Lasers, just copy the stats and swapped the higher value with the opposite damage type (example: L Scorch is 38 EM 8 Therm with 50% optimal, new L Conflagration 38 Therm 8 EM 50% optimal (why even shorter range on short range weapons is beyond me) Fixed, not much harder then making PLEX destroyable. Apparently CCP has bigger concerns.
AFK collecting of Research points? This is the closest thing to ghost training and that was nerfed, yet this still remains. You can't AFK in a mining barge, you can't really AFK with PI as the shortest extraction results in the fastest return on investment. Yet this passive income still remains. Remove most forms of passive income and make RP points more valueable by collecting them same as LP points, you have to complete jobs for the agent instead of comming back every couple of weeks for easy profit.
Catalyst destroyer graphics are acting funny randomly, thought mine was going to turn into a Decepticon yesterday. Can't just be me, other people are reporting it as well.
But somehow PLEXs are game breaking and need a fix. What will it be next week? Same bat time, same bat forum! Stay tuned!
|

Bankoff DarkFusion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:34:00 -
[74]
Also, kudos to CCP for their brilliant timing, introducing this change in the middle of Hulkageddon when gankers are out in force all over high sec.
|

Bankoff DarkFusion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:39:00 -
[75]
[They give them the item and they give them the option to use the item 100% securely. They cannot be successfully sued over this.
And then they create a gameplay system that detroys this item so that it can't be used, or that transfers the value of the item to someone who did not buy it. This is not just fraud but conspiracy to defraud.
Doesn't matter whether the company can be successfully sued - you don't have to prove the case before it goes to trial. Do you think CCP will want to defend a lawsuit over this issue?
|

Sol Lethe
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:40:00 -
[76]
Edited by: Sol Lethe on 09/07/2010 19:40:47 The only reason for this change is so that Activision-CCP might get a chance to make some money for nothing (see: destroyed in wreck). Other than that, I don't really care as you'd have to be pretty stupid to leave a station with one.
|

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:40:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor The major difference between a PLEX and every other item ingame is that a PLEX can not created by an ingame activity. Every other item can somehow be created by things you do ingame. A destruction of a capital fleet has no impact on real life (except for some tears). A destruction of a single PLEX does have an impact on the real world in the form that CCP now does not have to provide that 30 days of gametime.
The only GOOD reason for a PLEX to be moved by ship is if you purchased it from the market/contracts and want to sell it on the market/contracts in another station. As such, it is for all practical intents and purposes just another in-game item.
There are MORE than enough safeguards//options in place so that the person that actually purchased the PLEX using RL cash never really HAS to move the PLEX by ship anywhere, as he can just "spawn" it in the in-game world at any station of his choosing with minimal effort.
Hello Akita,
Im actually not affraid that i will ever lose a PLEX, but im sure there will be destroyed PLEX'. And im also not interested in the ingame value of those PLEX'. But the fact that every destroyed PLEX means that CCP does not have to provide 30 days of gametime makes me not like this change.
Elgaris.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:45:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Bankoff DarkFusion [They give them the item and they give them the option to use the item 100% securely. They cannot be successfully sued over this.
And then they create a gameplay system that detroys this item so that it can't be used, or that transfers the value of the item to someone who did not buy it. This is not just fraud but conspiracy to defraud.
Doesn't matter whether the company can be successfully sued - you don't have to prove the case before it goes to trial. Do you think CCP will want to defend a lawsuit over this issue?
Wrong they did not create a system that destroys the item, merely permitted a situation where it might be destroyed while also making it so there will NEVER BE ANY REASON TO ENTER THAT SITUATION seriously come up with one scenario where you have to physically move a plex that you yourself bought there wont be any because of the removal of the restriction to redemption in npc stations, there will never be a reason to move them ever, therefore its the same as giving people the option to trash a plex, if your damn fool enough to use it its your own fault and they prewarned you Me? im just sitting here,
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:47:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Bankoff DarkFusion [They give them the item and they give them the option to use the item 100% securely. They cannot be successfully sued over this.
And then they create a gameplay system that detroys this item so that it can't be used, or that transfers the value of the item to someone who did not buy it. This is not just fraud but conspiracy to defraud.
Doesn't matter whether the company can be successfully sued - you don't have to prove the case before it goes to trial. Do you think CCP will want to defend a lawsuit over this issue?
What is CCP conspiring to defraud people of? This is clearly a signature. |

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:56:00 -
[80]
Evidently CCP does not want to maintain extra code paths / database entries for the purpose of a single special item. If it helps maintenance, it's all for the better. It is true that a PLEX is different from every other in-game item in that it has an implicit contract associated with it: at any point it can be consumed to gain out-of-game benefits (i.e. game time). No other item (or 300 MISK in cash) has this power. But I do not see why these contracts should not be destroyable - after all, you can already trash a PLEX with similar outcome.
To all the people threatening to sue CCP for the loss of an in-game item: 
|

Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 19:56:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Akita T If you buy a 35$ cigar in an air-tight package. Scenario A : you light it, then go take a shower after taking the first puff, when you come back the cigar burned itself out Scenario B : you open the seal, leave the cigar on your porch to go do something else for a while, a sudden rain comes over and ruins it, soaking it all wet and dragging it through the mud Scenario C : you keep the package in your pocket, and on your way home some thief picks your pocket and steals it ... you don't scream at the tobacco shop for not being able to use the cigar as you intended, do you ?
ONCE REDEEMED, PLEX are in-game items, and they should not be treated any different from any other items. BEFORE REDEEMING a PLEX, they are for all practical intents and purposes invulnerable. There are next to no logical reasons (and maybe just one convenience//laziness reason) for a person that PURCHASED a PLEX with RL-cash to ever put that PLEX in a position where it MIGHT become vulnerable.
Yeah, but that is accidental use common to life. This is something different entirely, making a feature which does nothing but increase the risk of loss.
It would be more like you having a favorite cigar shop. One day that shop for rent reasons moves from its old location to a new one that happens to be in the worst side of town. That area has a high risk of robberies. You go there, chances are someone might stick you up for your cigar.
It's not the same because no one forces you to transport plex, but no one also forces you to go to that shop, and there's little reason to since you can get the exact same kind at the local convienience store. I think then you have a case to be miffed at your favorite shop for making a bad move.
But I think in the end CCP would just do it and people wouldn't transport them anyways. I agree with you on the risk at that part. Transporting it you risk it yourself.
|

Jagga Spikes
Minmatar Spikes Chop Shop
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:05:00 -
[82]
losing PLEX to ship destruction is same as paying subscription for months ahead and then walk away from the game.
...
just don't do it. it's that simple. ________________________________ : Forum Bore 'Em : Foamy The Squirrel - [jedi handwave] "There is no spoon." |

Phosphorus Palladium
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:06:00 -
[83]
Aaaah. Very nice changes.
/me tips hat. 
|

Asset Liquidator
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:21:00 -
[84]
The only people who have a problem with this are the ones who think that the minerals they mine themselves are free. |

Sakrak
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:26:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Ori Blake Edited by: Ori Blake on 09/07/2010 18:24:22
Originally by: Sakrak
They shouldn't be destroyed or looted because:
1. They are the only item in the game you DIRECTLY pay for in real money. 2. They are the only item in the game that DIRECTLY gives subscription time.
All other items are one stage off from that, and I think too many people here are looking at it from the PLEX buyer side. That side I can't see them needing to transport it at all as opposed to redeeming it on the spot. To them it is just ISK, but to the sellers, it's a real money cost, and a direct one. For them if they lose it its a direct loss in real world assets to replace it. For a buyer they just grind more missions.
It's moot though I think because no sane seller is going to transport them, and CCP introduces yet another "feature" it makes little sense to use.
Quote: The problem here is that a few people feel that you own a PLEX when you buy it. That is not true. You rarely own anything on your computer except the hardware. If you notice, EULA's are End User Licensing Agreements, not End User Ownership Agreements. While courts continue to debate if you own or license software, at present, you license it. As such, anything you purchase is generally partially-owned by the originating company, and your license can be terminated by clauses stipulated in the agreement.
Now, the other thing people have a problem with is that if a player pwns you and destroys or loots your PLEX, you feel that you just got robbed of real money. However, in general, you're paying $X dollars per month. You spend most of your time in game, (which is what you have purchased) missioning and lets say you earn 100 million isk over that month time. Now, you use that isk to buy a BS and fittings. Effectively, you've turned $X into 1 BS with fittings. Now you're BS gets pwned. Why is this not stealing of real money. Just because it took more steps shouldn't change the equation. (I don't think it is just to clarify).
I wish people would understand there is a difference between paying directly for something, and something having a cost due to the hours you put into it. One cost is actual: if you pay for a plex and it gets looted, to replace it you need to pay more real life money.
I agree its not real world theft due to EULA and licensing, but it's a generally stupid decision to add a feature that gives absolutely no benefit to an item you pay real money for while adding a ton of risk if you use the feature. Thankfully in this case you can just not transport them, so the end result wont be that harmful. But I have to ask why CCP cares so much about this when they could be fixing stuff that matters.
I understand the psychological attachment people have. My point is does degree of separation make any difference when talking about a medium of trade. I am no economic expert, but under ideal conditions shouldn't the two items being exchanged have nearly equal value. If this is the case how do you not transfer that value from: money -> PLEX -> ISK -> Ship, Module, etc, unless you are simply purchasing a license to spawn an in game item, owned by CCP, and subject to all the rules of the game. On your second point, someone mentioned earlier about buying low and selling high. This change would allow you to buy a PLEX in say Jita, and transfer it to Amarr where the price may be higher. I agree if someone is just using the game time I can see no reason to undock with the PLEX, therefore it is completely safe. TL;DR This change opens up more in game hauling and trading options while allowing everyone else to carry on as usual if they wish.
|

Quantum warrior
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:43:00 -
[86]
This sounds like politics..
They announce something that dont really mean much but will cause a stir while they sneak a bigger change through somewhere else.
Has anyone noticed any other changes? ;0)
|

Laura Indorin
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:45:00 -
[87]
There will be trillions of isk created and destroyed...
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 20:56:00 -
[88]
Every single in game item has a real monetary value and anyone that says otherwise is a moron.
And will probably undock with hundreds of dollars worth of plex cards.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Neil Larkin
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:01:00 -
[89]
I think these changes will be awesome. I mean seriously I would love to read the hate mail from idiots who were dumb enough to actually put a freakin' plex in their cargo. HAHA CCP is awesome.
In other words...MOAR TEARZ 
Also if your stupid enough to sue CCP, all the more fail to you sir.
|

Clytamnestra
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:10:00 -
[90]
Being able to move a plex is a convenience. Nothing has changed other than that. I would understand all the noise if you could transport them a 100% securely before, and they took that away.
They're still just as secure if you use them in the fashion you use them today.
|

Chesty McJubblies
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:14:00 -
[91]
Originally by: greentusk The only people who benefit from a plex being destroyed is CCP. There is absolutely zero reason for allowing plexes to be transported.
This is change for the sake of change. There's zero need for this. "We don't want some items to be special". ffs.
I'm neither for or against this change, it's just pointless. Apart from the bolded part above.
|

Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:22:00 -
[92]
i dont use plex's so this is just the observation of a player.
ccp ceo dude- we need more money
ccp staff dude- well there are these things called plex's. 5000euros worth get traded every hour in jita.
ccp ceo dude- well why cant we charge more for them.
ccp staff dude- well my idea is this. lets make the cash cows explode each others plex's. they then need to buy more plex's to replace the plex's they already paid us for.
ccp ceo dude- brilliant. extra cream from the cows, i love it
|

Ocularus Xenos
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:27:00 -
[93]
I think it's a good thing. Special items are bad. Blowing things up and watching the players reactions is good, it's the essence of eve. No item and no person should be immune.
|

Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:28:00 -
[94]
CCP has simply provided another mechanism to prove you are stupid.
Try not to prove them right this time.
===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |

Chesty McJubblies
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:29:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Ranger 1 CCP has simply provided another mechanism to prove you are stupid.
Try not to prove them right this time.
With a nice side effect for their balance sheet, too.
|

Destruct0
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:30:00 -
[96]
Ah the tears, how they shine. Out comes the capsuleer, with a glass of whine.
Ok I shall rhyme no more :P Also I couldnt care less about a PLEX because,
1. I am not DAFT enough to undock with a PLEX. 2. I have absolutely no reason to undock with a PLEX, a PLEX in a transport is commonly known as "gankbait" 3. Yes, CCP does directly stand to benefit if the said PLEX was destroyed by some eebil piwate(citation needed) but only if said PLEX owner is the captain of a failboat. 4. You guys have forgotten the golden rule of EVE. Never undock in/with something you cannot afford to lose. As soon as your undock that ****/ship...its as good as gone.
|

Sky Marshal
IMpAct Corp Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:31:00 -
[97]
Edited by: Sky Marshal on 09/07/2010 21:36:42 Ok...
So CCP want to remove the "special status" that players gave to Plexes. Well, I don't care. But as long than Plexes are the ONLY item who can be bought using real money to a GTC in this game, and also the only one who can be "redeemed", they will KEEP their "special status", whatever they do.
But apparently, it is more interesting than expected... After all, they successed to find maybe like one hour to (try to) change the "special status" of an item, and write a dev blog about it. But THEY STILL FAIL TO FIND FIVE FRAKKING MINUTES TO CORRECT ROCKETS who are screwed since 22 MONTHS ?
I don't understand how they work  _______ With the NGE, I'm sorry about the mistake we made. We screwed up and didn't listen to the fans when we should have. - John Smedley, CEO of Sony Online Entertainment |

Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:39:00 -
[98]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 09/07/2010 21:45:18
Originally by: Chesty McJubblies
Originally by: Ranger 1 CCP has simply provided another mechanism to prove you are stupid.
Try not to prove them right this time.
With a nice side effect for their balance sheet, too.
If, and only if, you are indeed stupid.
Sky Marshal:
Quote: So CCP want to remove the "special status" that players gave to Plexes. Well, I don't care. But as long than Plexes are the ONLY item who can be bought using real money to a GTC in this game, and also the only one who can be "redeemed", they will KEEP their "special status", whatever they do.
All items in game can be bought using real money to purchase a GTC and then selling the resultant plexes. What part of that don't you get. ===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:45:00 -
[99]
its a beautiful piece of social experimentation,
take a week, count the number of accounts that got popped hauling plex around, divide by total accounts,
instant percetage of Asinine morons in eve,
though i suspect this is also a case of people exploding when they read line 1 and not finishing the reading, as the you can move and loose them is first then every subsequent line in the blog says you never have to move them ever and its your problem if you doofus,,,
to the person who put its the same as trashing a plex by dumbfoolery, yes exactly so, id consider undocking with plex in hold to be an attempt to trash plex with more drama and explosions Me? im just sitting here,
|

Bankoff DarkFusion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:49:00 -
[100]
Just canceled the last of my 3 accounts. I feel pounds lighter knowing that I am getting this game out of my life. I might have stayed longer if I hadn't started reading the forums. Maybe the bullying in the game is not "real" but the bullying on the forums certainly is. Good luck to all the carebears.
|

Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:54:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Bankoff DarkFusion Just canceled the last of my 3 accounts. I feel pounds lighter knowing that I am getting this game out of my life. I might have stayed longer if I hadn't started reading the forums. Maybe the bullying in the game is not "real" but the bullying on the forums certainly is. Good luck to all the carebears.
If you can't understand that a plex has no value once created, outside of worthless game currency, then perhaps this was a wise move. ===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:55:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Ori Blake
Originally by: Akita T If you buy a 35$ cigar in an air-tight package. Scenario A : you light it, then go take a shower after taking the first puff, when you come back the cigar burned itself out Scenario B : you open the seal, leave the cigar on your porch to go do something else for a while, a sudden rain comes over and ruins it, soaking it all wet and dragging it through the mud Scenario C : you keep the package in your pocket, and on your way home some thief picks your pocket and steals it ... you don't scream at the tobacco shop for not being able to use the cigar as you intended, do you ?
ONCE REDEEMED, PLEX are in-game items, and they should not be treated any different from any other items. BEFORE REDEEMING a PLEX, they are for all practical intents and purposes invulnerable. There are next to no logical reasons (and maybe just one convenience//laziness reason) for a person that PURCHASED a PLEX with RL-cash to ever put that PLEX in a position where it MIGHT become vulnerable.
Yeah, but that is accidental use common to life. This is something different entirely, making a feature which does nothing but increase the risk of loss.
It would be more like you having a favorite cigar shop. One day that shop for rent reasons moves from its old location to a new one that happens to be in the worst side of town. That area has a high risk of robberies. You go there, chances are someone might stick you up for your cigar.
It's not the same because no one forces you to transport plex, but no one also forces you to go to that shop, and there's little reason to since you can get the exact same kind at the local convienience store. I think then you have a case to be miffed at your favorite shop for making a bad move.
But I think in the end CCP would just do it and people wouldn't transport them anyways. I agree with you on the risk at that part. Transporting it you risk it yourself.
It is much more like a second shop opens up in the new location. Nobody prevents you from simply buying cigars from the old one, just as nothing prevents you from simply redeeming the PLEXes at the station you bought them. A new market opportunity opens up - interstation PLEX trade - with the associated risk of passing through the bad neighborhood. But once again, the old way is still here. CCP has not removed anything from the game. You can keep playing in the same way as before, keeping your PLEXes in the stations, and nothing will ever happen to them.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:56:00 -
[103]
also responses to you wernt bullying mean or cruel (not like some replies to some people on other topics) merely pointing out how your big conspiracy to defraud people was untrue and incorrect
now if ccp had said you could only redeem plex in low sec or null, and only apply them in jita 4-4 then YES you would have been right because that would have been creating a situation where they forced you to put an object worth game time, bought using real money, in real risk, but they havnt and arnt, infact there will be less risk and obstacles to getting plex after the change so your fear and accusations are unfounded
oh and ps can i have your stuff ?
IM SORRY I COULDNT RESIST Me? im just sitting here,
|

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 21:59:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Ranger 1
If, and only if, you are indeed stupid.
Its not a question of if an individual is stupid or not. But its a fact that there are more than enough stupid people arround and CCP knows that. Its one thing to scam people out of there in game assets but an completly other withdraw real and paid gametime from the (stupid) players. Its almost like if you could lose your Windows licence by clicking on the wrong button.
PLEXs are paid gametime. Removing them from the game in whatever way is not ok!
Elgaris.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:04:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: Ranger 1
If, and only if, you are indeed stupid.
Its not a question of if an individual is stupid or not. But its a fact that there are more than enough stupid people arround and CCP knows that. Its one thing to scam people out of there in game assets but an completly other withdraw real and paid gametime from the (stupid) players. Its almost like if you could lose your Windows licence by clicking on the wrong button.
PLEXs are paid gametime. Removing them from the game in whatever way is not ok!
Elgaris.
however fundamentally your position is CCP has a duty to prevent players from doing something stupidly dumb and pointless,
by that logic, CCP will have to trap in stations or ban half the paying customers until they are statisfied they wont fly a fail fit or autopilot through lowsec etc etc Me? im just sitting here,
|

Ranger 1
Amarr Dynaverse Corporation Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:10:00 -
[106]
Edited by: Ranger 1 on 09/07/2010 22:10:55
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: Ranger 1
If, and only if, you are indeed stupid.
Its not a question of if an individual is stupid or not. But its a fact that there are more than enough stupid people arround and CCP knows that. Its one thing to scam people out of there in game assets but an completly other withdraw real and paid gametime from the (stupid) players. Its almost like if you could lose your Windows licence by clicking on the wrong button.
PLEXs are paid game time. Removing them from the game in whatever way is not ok!
Elgaris.
No GTC's are paid game time. A PLEX is simply an worthless icon ingame that allows you to sell or trade that time to another person. Once converted into a plex it is the same as any other ingame item.
If you wish to attach values associated with the real world cost of a GTC, then every item that you have ingame has a value in real money. That Hulk that just got ganked blew a $5 hole in your bank account. Because, by your reasoning, that Hulk could have converted into isk on the market and that would have covered part of the cost of a plex. However since ingame items have no value, and are in fact CCP property, Plex retain no real world value. Period.
On the other point, yes I am sure there are plenty of stupid people that will decide to move a Plex (despite all warnings). These are the same people that will lose the same "fictional value" as a plex many times over in other ingame assets due to the very same stupidity.
===== If you go to Za'Ha'Dum I will gank you. |

Shaalira D'arc
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:16:00 -
[107]
If you bought PLEX with isk in order to convert them into subscription time, this change does not affect your behavior. The transaction is still 100% secure.
If you bought PLEX with real-life money in order to sell for isk, this change does not affect your behavior. You can obtain the PLEX at any station you can travel to, and you can put it up immediately on the market. The transaction is still 100% secure.
If you bought PLEX with real-life money for subscription time for yourself or one of your friends, this change does not affect your behavior. PLEX can still be traded or contracted in station, and the transaction is still 100% secure.
Why the fuss?
The change merely permits PLEX to be moved out of station. If you're at all squeamish about real-life purchases being destroyed, you never have to do this.
Why have such a change? Several reasons, not necessarily CCP's own:
Game Philosophy: EVE is a sandbox. Fewer artificial restrictions elevate that goal. Items that are treated as different or special tend to subvert immersion.
Trade Opportunities: Haulers can transport PLEX across regions, traders can exploit market opportunities, speculators can stockpile PLEX in one location, crash the market, etc. The economic game is a huge part of EVE and this change integrates PLEX into that. For a well-financed trader, a PLEX is now merely another expensive commodity with its own cyclic demand and supply.
Player Flexibility: Let's say your character invested in a PLEX in Rens but never got around to using it (a buddy-invite subscribed, for example). Due to career decisions, roleplay, or politics, your character can no longer enter Matari space. You want to liquidate or barter the PLEX but you have no access to the station. Solution? Set up a courier contract, with collateral equivalent to the amount you want to sell the PLEX for.
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:25:00 -
[108]
Edited by: Cap II on 09/07/2010 22:32:18
Originally by: Ranger 1 Edited by: Ranger 1 on 09/07/2010 22:10:55
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: Ranger 1
If, and only if, you are indeed stupid.
Its not a question of if an individual is stupid or not. But its a fact that there are more than enough stupid people arround and CCP knows that. Its one thing to scam people out of there in game assets but an completly other withdraw real and paid gametime from the (stupid) players. Its almost like if you could lose your Windows licence by clicking on the wrong button.
PLEXs are paid game time. Removing them from the game in whatever way is not ok!
Elgaris.
No GTC's are paid game time. A PLEX is simply an worthless icon ingame that allows you to sell or trade that time to another person. Once converted into a plex it is the same as any other ingame item.
If you wish to attach values associated with the real world cost of a GTC, then every item that you have ingame has a value in real money. That Hulk that just got ganked blew a $5 hole in your bank account. Because, by your reasoning, that Hulk could have converted into isk on the market and that would have covered part of the cost of a plex. However since ingame items have no value, and are in fact CCP property, Plex retain no real world value. Period.
On the other point, yes I am sure there are plenty of stupid people that will decide to move a Plex (despite all warnings). These are the same people that will lose the same "fictional value" as a plex many times over in other ingame assets due to the very same stupidity.
Let me introduce you to a little concept called Opportunity Cost. CCP has created a de facto exchange rate of $34.95 for 600mil isk give or take. Regardless of how much CCP says it only goes one way, regardless of whether or not you have enough brain cells to realize it, an exchange rate is a two way street. You can jump up and down and scream about how in game items have no real monetary value but this flies in the face of objective reality and no more than thirty seconds of critical thinking will lead to this conclusion.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:26:00 -
[109]
Edited by: Elgaris Dukor on 09/07/2010 22:27:47
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto
however fundamentally your position is CCP has a duty to prevent players from doing something stupidly dumb and pointless,
by that logic, CCP will have to trap in stations or ban half the paying customers until they are statisfied they wont fly a fail fit or autopilot through lowsec etc etc
No, i think the fundamental misconception of CCP (and maybe you too) is that because a PLEX has a value equal to say a well fitted ship that it is the same thing to lose the ship or the PLEX. That is not that case. Even if the lost value is equal there are some fundamental differences: - The ship can be replaced by ingame activity (gathering resources and rebuilding the ship or hubting NPCs for the lost modules). The PLEX can not be replaced by any ingame activity. Once its lost it has to be purchased again or its gone forever. - The PLEX can be converted to gametime, which is a real life thing, the ship not. IF the PLEX is destroyed the paid gametime is gone too.
Maybe i should make an example. Case 1) Player A buys a GTC to convert it to PLEXs and sells them for isk to Player B. PLayer A buys a ship from that money and destroys it. => Player A has lost his ship but the paid gametime is still owned by Player B. Case 2) Player A buys a GTC to convert it to PLEXs and destroys them (in whatever way). => The gametime that has been paid for is gone. Neither Player A or PLayer B has it.
Elgaris.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:33:00 -
[110]
Edited by: Takashi Halamoto on 09/07/2010 22:35:00 gametime is not a finite resource that must be hoarded and treated with care, the markets in empire are full of plex, more are added daily, probably hourly, and if gametime is destroyed or lost there is no net diminishing of eve because the supply exceeds demand
and so i assume you also believe plex should not be trashable so for instance evil market manipulator (tm) couldnt just go into jita today buy 100 and trash them all thus removing 3000days of gametime,
and your wrong from my point of view as player b who buys the plex for isk, if it is lost (which it wont i will be applying it in the station i buy it) i just make another 300mil isk and buy another one as there are plenty out there to buy so i as an end user DO subjectivly see them as being equal to isk in that ingame activity replaces them just like a ship
Me? im just sitting here,
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:33:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor Edited by: Elgaris Dukor on 09/07/2010 22:27:47
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto
however fundamentally your position is CCP has a duty to prevent players from doing something stupidly dumb and pointless,
by that logic, CCP will have to trap in stations or ban half the paying customers until they are statisfied they wont fly a fail fit or autopilot through lowsec etc etc
No, i think the fundamental misconception of CCP (and maybe you too) is that because a PLEX has a value equal to say a well fitted ship that it is the same thing to lose the ship or the PLEX. That is not that case. Even if the lost value is equal there are some fundamental differences: - The ship can be replaced by ingame activity (gathering resources and rebuilding the ship or hubting NPCs for the lost modules). The PLEX can not be replaced by any ingame activity. Once its lost it has to be purchased again or its gone forever. - The PLEX can be converted to gametime, which is a real life thing, the ship not. IF the PLEX is destroyed the paid gametime is gone too.
Maybe i should make an example. Case 1) Player A buys a GTC to convert it to PLEXs and sells them for isk to Player B. PLayer A buys a ship from that money and destroys it. => Player A has lost his ship but the paid gametime is still owned by Player B. Case 2) Player A buys a GTC to convert it to PLEXs and destroys them (in whatever way). => The gametime that has been paid for is gone. Neither Player A or PLayer B has it.
Elgaris.
The fault in your statement is where you say that a plex cannot be replaced in game. Simply rat up 300mil isk and the plex is replaced.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:41:00 -
[112]
Originally by: Cap II
The fault in your statement is where you say that a plex cannot be replaced in game. Simply rat up 300mil isk and the plex is replaced.
No you are wrong here. You can rat 300m but that does not replace the PLEX. The PLEX is gone. You can buy an other one from another player but the first one stays gone. The only way to replave a PLEX is to buy a GTC and convert it into a PLEX. There is no ingame source of PLEXs.
Elgaris.
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:45:00 -
[113]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: Cap II
The fault in your statement is where you say that a plex cannot be replaced in game. Simply rat up 300mil isk and the plex is replaced.
No you are wrong here. You can rat 300m but that does not replace the Ship. The Ship is gone. You can buy an other one from another player but the first one stays gone. The only way to replave a Ship is to buy a miner and convert it into a rocks and build the ship.. There is no ingame source of ships.
Elgaris.
No, you are wrong.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

siC0 b0b
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:47:00 -
[114]
You convert GTC into a PLEX purely to legaly make ISK outside of the game, that's the reason this item was implemented. If you lose a PLEX to whatever reason, it's the same as losing an equal amount of ISK in any other way.
PLEX is only an item in the game that is valued in ingame currency and it rightfuly so is going to be treated as one. I'm inclined to believe that if CCP didn't incluce the part in their DevBlog about ragequitting, none of the complaining people would even speak up. This all sounds like an easily manipulated mob's rabble.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:49:00 -
[115]
but there are more plexes out there and more can come into existence at any point the fact one specific unique combination of numbers that acts as a permit to continue to play in eve is gone is not important to the people using the plex, they only care that they have one,
Freki's/Imperial Apocs/Guardian Vexxor etc etc are unique a limited number exist and no mechanism for replacing them exists but they can be destroyed and when the last is gone, they are gone, forever
plexes cannot be created through ingame actions TRUE BUT they can be made to exist in game, ie they can be created, thus they are non unique and non finite
your position makes the false assumption that if an object is not creatable in game it is somehow unique and should be protected, but said item can still be made to exist Me? im just sitting here,
|

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:52:00 -
[116]
Originally by: siC0 b0b You convert GTC into a PLEX purely to legaly make ISK outside of the game, that's the reason this item was implemented. If you lose a PLEX to whatever reason, it's the same as losing an equal amount of ISK in any other way.
PLEX is only an item in the game that is valued in ingame currency and it rightfuly so is going to be treated as one. I'm inclined to believe that if CCP didn't incluce the part in their DevBlog about ragequitting, none of the complaining people would even speak up. This all sounds like an easily manipulated mob's rabble.
That is what CCP tries to tell us but that is just not true, sorry. The fact that you can convert the PLEX to gametime, which is nothing virtual but something very real, makes PLEXs a special thing.
Elgaris.
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 22:54:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: siC0 b0b You convert GTC into a PLEX purely to legaly make ISK outside of the game, that's the reason this item was implemented. If you lose a PLEX to whatever reason, it's the same as losing an equal amount of ISK in any other way.
PLEX is only an item in the game that is valued in ingame currency and it rightfuly so is going to be treated as one. I'm inclined to believe that if CCP didn't incluce the part in their DevBlog about ragequitting, none of the complaining people would even speak up. This all sounds like an easily manipulated mob's rabble.
That is what CCP tries to tell us but that is just not true, sorry. The fact that you can convert the PLEX to gametime, which is nothing virtual but something very real, makes PLEXs a special thing.
Elgaris.
Tell me, is it painful to be this stupid? Because if it isn't, it should be.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:00:00 -
[118]
so because i can turn a plex into gametime it is special even if i dont do so?
if so i can turn 300mil into a plex, into gametime, so 300mil is special,
if so i can turn a Carrier into 600mil isk into plex into gametime so a carrier is special
once you equate a thing with an isk cost to being special all things that can be converted into said isk and the isk itself must be special by extension,
you treat a plex as a potential energy of time, and that temporal potential as being special, thus all things must be special because all things are a potential of time, Me? im just sitting here,
|

Picadilly
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:01:00 -
[119]
A further step in the philosophy of "Your loss"
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:01:00 -
[120]
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto so because i can turn a plex into gametime it is special even if i dont do so?
if so i can turn 300mil into a plex, into gametime, so 300mil is special,
if so i can turn a Carrier into 600mil isk into plex into gametime so a carrier is special
once you equate a thing with an isk cost to being special all things that can be converted into said isk and the isk itself must be special by extension,
you treat a plex as a potential energy of time, and that temporal potential as being special, thus all things must be special because all things are a potential of time,
I can see how opportunity cost would be a hard concept for some people to grasp but good job outlining the idea.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:05:00 -
[121]
Originally by: Cap II
Tell me, is it painful to be this stupid? Because if it isn't, it should be.
Well its obvious that you disagree with my statements, but maybe you could elaborate a bit more on why you think I am stupid, so I can learn from your greatness.
|

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:08:00 -
[122]
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor
Originally by: Cap II
Tell me, is it painful to be this stupid? Because if it isn't, it should be.
Well its obvious that you disagree with my statements, but maybe you could elaborate a bit more on why you think I am stupid, so I can learn from your greatness.
Mostly because you fail to grasp the most basic concepts of market even after having your statement changed from plex to ships and still failing to grasp that your argument could be made for any and every in game item. Therefore I can only conclude that you are stupid. I hope that you have learned from my greatness.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:14:00 -
[123]
Edited by: Elgaris Dukor on 09/07/2010 23:15:59
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto so because i can turn a plex into gametime it is special even if i dont do so?
if so i can turn 300mil into a plex, into gametime, so 300mil is special,
if so i can turn a Carrier into 600mil isk into plex into gametime so a carrier is special
once you equate a thing with an isk cost to being special all things that can be converted into said isk and the isk itself must be special by extension,
you treat a plex as a potential energy of time, and that temporal potential as being special, thus all things must be special because all things are a potential of time,
I say just because two things do have the same value doenst mean they are equal. As long as the PLEX stays intact there is indeed no difference but as soon as the PLEX gets destroys there is one.
It makes a difference if a PLEX or a 300m module gets destroyed. That is what i say. I explained the reasons some posts above.
Elgaris.
|

Ezurion
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:17:00 -
[124]
There are some incredibly stupid people posting in this thread.
Yes, it does suit CCP to make this change. Some of these items will inevitably be destroyed for one reason or another, but it will always be down to the owner taking a risk.
I don't see it as a particularly necessary change, although I understand why it's being done.
There really is no need to go mental over this change, it's not going to affect your PLEX purchasing/usage if you don't want it to.
Stop overreacting and take a few minutes to consider this change logically. |

Cap II
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:19:00 -
[125]
Edited by: Cap II on 09/07/2010 23:19:57
Originally by: Elgaris Dukor Edited by: Elgaris Dukor on 09/07/2010 23:15:59
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto so because i can turn a plex into gametime it is special even if i dont do so?
if so i can turn 300mil into a plex, into gametime, so 300mil is special,
if so i can turn a Carrier into 600mil isk into plex into gametime so a carrier is special
once you equate a thing with an isk cost to being special all things that can be converted into said isk and the isk itself must be special by extension,
you treat a plex as a potential energy of time, and that temporal potential as being special, thus all things must be special because all things are a potential of time,
I say just because two things do have the same value doenst mean they are equal. As long as the PLEX stays intact there is indeed no difference but as soon as the PLEX gets destroys there is one.
It makes a difference if a PLEX or a 300m module gets destroyed. That is what i say. I explained the reasons some posts above.
Elgaris.
Just because you explained your reasons for something doesn't make it any more true. Your argument boils down to "they have the same value but are not equal." This is where you make it obvious that Econ 101 is over your head. I would encourage you to educate yourself on the concept of Opportunity Cost as has been mentioned several times now.

[yellow]Sig removed, inappropriate content. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Cortes[ |

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:20:00 -
[126]
but a plex IS NOT game time, it is the potential to get game time, it in and of itself is not the game time merely a trade able commodity that can be exchanged for time, thus it is the same as the module or cash which i could exchange for plex then exchange for time,
if the plex is destroyed Time is not lost or destroyed merely an object that allows the use of some time is lost, Me? im just sitting here,
|

John Ellsworth
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:20:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler
Originally by: Aqriue
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Now this will be fun, Jita is going to go through the roof, and expect about 500% more emo rage quit posts ("Someone ganked me with 3 PLEXes in Cargo")
No, it will a complete debacle on the end of CCP.
"Hello, XYZ Bank. How may I help you?" "Hi. I noticed I have a suspicious charge on my account." "Which one would that be?" "The one marked CCP. Its over seas." "Did you iniate that transaction?" "No. I would like that charged stopped." "Yes, we will look into it."
Making PLEXs destroyable and transportable is beyond stupid on the part of CCP. If I pay close to $40 USD after tax to the company, I expect to get the value of those PLEX and not loose it to some gank, **** off to any stupid concept of "Its a harsh universe." just because I grabbed it by mistake while loading junk with a ****ty UI interface provided by CCP. If by this statement; "If you blow up a ship that happens to be carrying PLEX, it may drop the PLEX as loot or it may be destroyed in the conflagration" there are currently to many PLEX and CCP wants to remove them, Then stop selling them for a time and change the PLEX offer to a three month subscription link for $10 USD more which has more value then pixelated decimal points. Watching real life cash get vaporized in a game is simply stupid, there will be subscriptions canceled by players and CCP will be eating sour words of "Yeah, we f***** up. Big Time."
Nobody is forcing you to undock with PLEXs in your hold.
Yes I have to say if you do undock with plex in your cargo-hold you deserve to be ganked and loose it..
|

Elgaris Dukor
Caldari Femti Runa Eru ParadoXon Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:27:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Takashi Halamoto but a plex IS NOT game time, it is the potential to get game time, it in and of itself is not the game time merely a trade able commodity that can be exchanged for time, thus it is the same as the module or cash which i could exchange for plex then exchange for time
Well ok. Than thats the point where we disagree. I dont think a line can be drawn there. But thats just my opinion.
|

Bilko Bobski
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:30:00 -
[129]
I personally think it's a great change, but to those who seem to think that PLEX is in one way or another different to other items; think of it this way: -If you lost a module that could have been refined for 10,000 magacyte, or sold for it's value - would you feel any different to losing 10,000 pure megacyte? No, because they both equate to the same amount of ISK and the same loss.
-If you lost an item that you bought for $15, and could have sold for 350Million ISK - why should you feel any different to losing a ship that was worth 350Million ISK; and therefore was equal to $15 that you could have saved on next month's subscription?
Thinking of PLEX differently because you bought it directly with RL money is silly - if you're counting the $15 dollars as 350M ISK, then every 350M ISK should also feel like a loss of $15. If you don't agree, you've already failed at basic EVE economics - quit now.
|

Takashi Halamoto
No Limit Productions Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.07.09 23:32:00 -
[130]
your argument would be valid if ccp only made a limited volume of plex available in a specific time frame, ie if only 100 plex a day could ever be sold then each one destroyed would equal an actual loss of time, as time that couldnt be recovered would be depleted, BUT if plex sales are unlimited then time is not destroyed merely a medium of accessing said time, my router is not the internet but its my way of accessing it, if my router is destroyed the internet is not destroyed merely my way of accessing it,
and to the person who suggests telling the bank that they didnt initiate the money transfer to ccp to get their money back,,, when ccp protests and shows the logs of you authorising the transaction your bank takes you to court for fraud, as if you really did initiate the transaction, lying to get your money back is fraud Me? im just sitting here,
|

LifeshifterX
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 00:28:00 -
[131]
I think its pretty interesting they are doing it but hell if you just stick with how they've been used bough and traded only in the station you got them from and if you just use them like your supposed to then there isn't much to worry about, I don't know why anyone would fly around with them in the cargo anyways haha
No biggie to me short n sweet, people need to stop emoraging about it. It aint that big of a deal
|

Selene D'Celeste
Caldari The D'Celeste Trading Company ISK Six
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 00:29:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 09/07/2010 17:50:48 You guys are a bunch of short-sighted whiners.
Check it out. You have a PLEX you want to sell. You want to sell it in X station. Instead of putting it in your cargo, LEAVE IT IN YOUR REDEEM ITEMS BOX (or convert it there or whatever) and then once you arrive to the destination get it out. Easy peasy.
Hey Siig, talking of redeem items boxes, still waiting on that 2 bil to show up in mine.
I know a few guys waiting for a wallet blinky from Siig as well. =P ______________________________
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 04:20:00 -
[133]
I have to point this out.
Just because it is against the EULA to trade ISK does not mean it is worthless, it means it is against the rules to trade it.
One of the most "eve famous" people has an add right on their website that sells and buys isk.
It is also illegal to buy and sell *******, but if you think ******* has no value because of this we can all get a good laugh.
I do not endorse or condone the violation of the EULA or rules of conduct in any way shape or form.
But again, to deny that ISK has value is a ridiculous notion. This is clearly a signature. |

Diggs Lonewalker
|
Posted - 2010.07.10 05:34:00 -
[134]
While I don't see much point in this other than some marginal trading issues, I think that CCP should add the contraband tag to this item (with no penalty) so that players can be warned should they accidentally load a PLEX in to their ship.
Now if I could find one as a loot drop or a scanned site loot item.. well then...
-Diggs
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |