| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Riall
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:09:00 -
[61] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote: then the engineer says "alright, here's a new design that is far more resilient but it can't mine much and well we're going to have to put a half-billion price tag on it because R&D ain't free"
also lol you think you buy hulks from npcs
You mean you haven't yet shuttled on down to your local ORE dealer to test pilot the new Skiff SCE (Super Cyno Edition)?
Lore-wise, having ships change to match the market makes sense. The OP and the barge fairy thread are whining about cheese being moved. Well, cheese gets moved.
"Buy PLEX, don't be a space butt" |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
456
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:15:00 -
[62] - Quote
The D1ngo wrote:I don't think he "dodged" anything...I think he put the facts right in your face. Stuck it right in. In fact, one could say that you and all of the "weak-tanked trolls" in this thread got ganked. Should have fit a damage control 2 on your pie hole. Merely regurgitating the new descriptions is not an explanation for anything. EVE's 4th of July Fireworks |

Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Zombie Ninja Space Bears
55
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:35:00 -
[63] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Lady Spank wrote:They were never intended to be used in high sec anyway.
dangers of deep space LoL So ever ship that is more resilient is not designed for High Sec. Like saying an SUV is designed for off road so you should not drive it on roads. The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.
So, I just bought a Sabre, I intend to use it to bubble warbears camping the Rens undock
edit: I thought you said "The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.", dictor bubbles can't be used outside of 0.0, you lied Quit Crying and Just Suck It Up |

Lady Ayeipsia
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
289
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:42:00 -
[64] - Quote
Alaekessa wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Lady Spank wrote:They were never intended to be used in high sec anyway.
dangers of deep space LoL So ever ship that is more resilient is not designed for High Sec. Like saying an SUV is designed for off road so you should not drive it on roads. The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for. So, I just bought a Sabre, I intend to use it to bubble warbears camping the Rens undock edit: I thought you said "The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.", dictor bubbles can't be used outside of 0.0, you lied
He said ship, not mod. You can fly your saber in hi sec, no one is stopping you. You should have suggested a carrier or dread to make your point. |

Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
89
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:47:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lady Ayeipsia wrote:Alaekessa wrote:So, I just bought a Sabre, I intend to use it to bubble warbears camping the Rens undock
edit: I thought you said "The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.", dictor bubbles can't be used outside of 0.0, you lied He said ship, not mod. You can fly your saber in hi sec, no one is stopping you. You should have suggested a carrier or dread to make your point.
so I'm choosing to read this as "disable strip miners in highsec" GÇô postum faex est GÇô-á
never forget
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
261
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:50:00 -
[66] - Quote
Phill Esteen wrote:Lady Ayeipsia wrote:Alaekessa wrote:So, I just bought a Sabre, I intend to use it to bubble warbears camping the Rens undock
edit: I thought you said "The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.", dictor bubbles can't be used outside of 0.0, you lied He said ship, not mod. You can fly your saber in hi sec, no one is stopping you. You should have suggested a carrier or dread to make your point. so I'm choosing to read this as "disable strip miners in highsec" Exhumers are not the only ships that use strip miners and T1 barges have no reference to being intended for deep space usage on TQ or sisi. |

Alara IonStorm
2773
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:50:00 -
[67] - Quote
Alaekessa wrote: So, I just bought a Sabre, I intend to use it to bubble warbears camping the Rens undock
edit: I thought you said "The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.", dictor bubbles can't be used outside of 0.0, you lied
There are laws against using certain weapons, there are no laws against using these ships.
Perhaps if anyone who made the law agreed with the OP that they were Null Sec exclusive ships there would be but there isn't. Check Mate. |

Jaison Savrin
Dragon's Rage Ethereal Dawn
1
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 19:55:00 -
[68] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Many miners did not tank their Hulks for a simple reason: Tanking a piece of tissue paper leaves you with a slightly stronger piece of tissue paper. If the gankers come for you, you still die. Best to have a cheap fit, maximize the yield, and hope you make enough money before it dies.
The new stats means it actually makes sense to add a tank. So many now will.
That. 25k or so EHP on my alts Hulk was just not enough reason to tank one. Given their price, lack of tank and the love of ganking them I actually never bought one at all until I got him out to 0.0. |

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
27
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 20:20:00 -
[69] - Quote
[quote=Lady Spank]A new gas ship could freshen up the industry but how am I supposed to roleplay a miner, out on the limits of civilised space, bashing my ship with giant wrenches to keep it going and chewing on ore, evading space pirates if my ship is all heavily tanked.
It's not meant to be a combat vessel, a Thrasher is. Hulks also have a far superior tank to a Thrasher.[/quote]
Only if you fit one and high sec miners who feel that they should never be able to die don't feel it is necessary to actually fit the tank that stops them from dieing. . .
|

Marconus Orion
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
365
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 20:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Spank tears, best tears. |

Denidil
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
356
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:17:00 -
[71] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:
Feel free to point out any high sec suicide gank I have taken part in, because I don't recall ever having done so. Thanks for proving how worthless your opinion is since you are incapable of posting objectively. t.
i'm mocking everybody who whines about the barges getting EHP buffs, and anybody who whines about the role changes of the barges. i think i'm pretty much being an equal opportunity mocker of crybabies. If you don't see a problem in 0.0 eroding into two big super-coalitions and a few hangers on in areas nobody cares about.. then you don't have brains. |

Jett0
Surface Warfare Tribal Band
218
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 22:39:00 -
[72] - Quote
Might be a troll? Either way:
I think it's interesting you bring up a lore-based reason why exhumers should or should not be in a certain place.
(Theory-crafting ahoy! -->) Balance always has to take priority. You already have better minerals in low and null. If exhumers could only be used there, you'd skew the mineral economy in that direction exponentially, which is much harder to design around than a linear progression of benefits.
On a side note, and not aimed at the OP, I think it's kind of funny how miner status went from "Er... you find that fun? Okay..." to "YOUR CHOSEN PLAY-STYLE IN A VIDEO GAME DIRECTLY REFLECTS YOUR DEFICIENCIES AS A PERSON." Gank-whines aside...
Alara IonStorm wrote:The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for. Veldnaught, anyone? Occasionally plays sober |

Alara IonStorm
2775
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 22:40:00 -
[73] - Quote
Objective enough?  |

Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 02:44:00 -
[74] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Lady Spank wrote:They were never intended to be used in high sec anyway.
dangers of deep space LoL So ever ship that is more resilient is not designed for High Sec. Like saying an SUV is designed for off road so you should not drive it on roads. The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for.
ROFL
ok by that reasoning you can put guns on a Rorq and go kick someones ass because you decide what the ships does. All those role bonuses and skill effects are just suggestions. |

Jimmy Gunsmythe
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
83
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 02:59:00 -
[75] - Quote
Evolution. Adapt or die.
As for the phrase 'deep space', I can interpret that to mean anything over 1 AU from any major stellar structure. A good predator knows how to live in balance with his prey, lest he follow them into oblivion. |

Grumpymunky
Super Monkey Tribe of Danger
428
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:18:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Feel free to point out any high sec suicide gank I have taken part in, because I don't recall ever having done so. Because that's what alts are for.
Post with your monkey. |

Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
91
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:32:00 -
[77] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Objective enough? 
The only evidence of Lady Spank ganking Hulks in that thread is coming from Lady Spank. I don't trust Lady Spank, so I'm going to ignore your post. GÇô postum faex est GÇô-á
never forget
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
156
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:36:00 -
[78] - Quote
So it is fine, if Combat Pilots can use shiny T2/3 stuff in highsec and get their shiny ships buffed ... sorry, rebalanced ... but it is NOT fine, if other professions like Miners and Industrials get their ships reBALANCED?
Lady Spank wrote:the dangers of deep space.
All I see is DEEP SPACE ... I can't find any LOW SECURE SPACE or SERO SECURE SPACE! Deep Space == ANYTHING outside of planetary atmospher!
In addition for most Miners high sec is FAR more dangures (and deeper) then low/null sec!! Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Tyraeil Starblade
Ronin Wing
13
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:42:00 -
[79] - Quote
I see you like feeding trolls... I hear Skyrim has a lot of hungry ice trolls to feed. |

Deacon of Destruction
Temple of Destruction
0
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
srsly Spank, the quality of your trolling is in serious decline. It's almost like you don't give a **** one way or the other. That's the secret of trolling. You have to care. C'mon. Get it together. What happened to Hydra? You guys are pathetic these days. Did you even compete in AT? |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
261
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:53:00 -
[81] - Quote
Garreth Vlox wrote:Alara IonStorm wrote:Lady Spank wrote:They were never intended to be used in high sec anyway.
dangers of deep space LoL So ever ship that is more resilient is not designed for High Sec. Like saying an SUV is designed for off road so you should not drive it on roads. The guys who buy the ship decide what it is intended for. ROFL ok by that reasoning you can put guns on a Rorq and go kick someones ass because you decide what the ships does. All those role bonuses and skill effects are just suggestions. You don't need guns. You have empty slots and a drone bay, be creative. |

Alara IonStorm
2778
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 03:55:00 -
[82] - Quote
Garreth Vlox wrote: ROFL
ok by that reasoning you can put guns on a Rorq and go kick someones ass because you decide what the ships does. All those role bonuses and skill effects are just suggestions.
Not at all by my reasoning. You are talking about a ships base capabilities.
A Hulks base capabilities never made it worse for High Sec or impeded its performance in High Sec. A Rorq has no gun slots and has limitations as a gun boat, the Hulk has no such mining limitations.
The fluff text says the defensive capabilities are suited to be able handle Deep Space dangers like an SUV is suited to off roading.
|

Sid Hudgens
Totally not an NPC Corp
127
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:00:00 -
[83] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:They were never intended to be used in high sec anyway. I'm not concerned with the actual changes CCP are making to these ships but the thought process that goes behind it and it's ramifications for the game as a whole. CCP are catering to the casual players and in doing so are turning New Eden from a dark and consequence filled universe to that of a hand-holding nanny state. Quote:The Hulk is the largest craft in the second generation of mining vessels created by the ORE Syndicate. Exhumers, like their mining barge cousins, are equipped with electronic subsystems specifically designed to accommodate Strip Mining modules. They are also far more resilient, better able to handle the dangers of deep space. The Hulk is, bar none, the most efficient mining vessel available. Quote:The Skiff is the smallest of the second generation of mining vessels created by the ORE Syndicate. Exhumers, like their mining barge cousins, are equipped with electronic subsystems specifically designed to accommodate Strip Mining modules. They are also far more resilient, better able to handle the dangers of deep space. Skiffs are specialty vessels, designed to mine Mercoxit. Quote:The Mackinaw is the medium-sized version of the second generation of mining vessels created by the ORE Syndicate. Exhumers, like their mining barge cousins, are equipped with electronic subsystems specifically designed to accommodate Strip Mining modules. They are also far more resilient, better able to handle the dangers of deep space. The Mackinaw is a specialty vessel, ideally suited for ice mining. Clearly they were not intended for the starter systems which comprise high-sec empire.
Rock, meet paper.
Your move. "....as if 10,058 Goon voices cried out and were suddenly silenced." |

Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
247
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
Please stop reminding Spank what an awful poster he is. He hasn't responded to this thread in pages and I think you may have scared him away. However, do feel free to continue poking holes in his terrible excuse for an argument. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
410
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:12:00 -
[85] - Quote
Suqq Madiq wrote:Please stop reminding Spank what an awful poster he is. He hasn't responded to this thread in pages and I think you may have scared him away. However, do feel free to continue poking holes in his terrible excuse for an argument. I have a better idea: suqq madiq. Nothing Found |

Major Bibi
11
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 04:44:00 -
[86] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Thank you for confirming the new quotes cleverly remove any reference to their original intended use in 'deep space'.
I'm still surprised that high-sec miners never actually adapted to all the suicide ganging and simply carried on getting themselves killed but I suppose that says more about society and their senses of entitlement than it does about internet spaceships.
I have never been suicide ganked even once, I don't know how other people make such big targets of themselves and then expect to have a right to complain. some did , the ones who read the forums , there still plenty out there that will not or are not even aware there is a forum and devblogs, so i sometimes find it hard to understand why so many gankers are acting like it is the end of the world you probably will still find alot of them who will not even bother to tank the buffed up mack or skiff, because of some false sense of security, if they get ganked and they will it is their fault not some gamemechanic gankers will need to learn how to scan their intended targets first i guess |

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 08:04:00 -
[87] - Quote
The reason suicide ganking exists is the unrealistic outcome of insurance pay outs. Not even in a fantasy distant future would anyone pay an insurance claim of someone who committed a crime and lost his ship in the process, its stupid. All CCP needed to do was invalidate insurance if you are blown up by concord if they are so concerned about sucide ganking.
|

Alara IonStorm
2780
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 08:10:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kryss Darkdust wrote:The reason suicide ganking exists is the unrealistic outcome of insurance pay outs. Not even in a fantasy distant future would anyone pay an insurance claim of someone who committed a crime and lost his ship in the process, its stupid. All CCP needed to do was invalidate insurance if you are blown up by concord if they are so concerned about sucide ganking. Insurance for Suicide Gankers has been removed since Crucible. |

March rabbit
R.I.P. Legion Red Alliance
230
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 08:53:00 -
[89] - Quote
Richard Desturned wrote: then the engineer says "alright, here's a new design that is far more resilient but it can't mine much and well we're going to have to put a half-billion price tag on it because R&D ain't free"
next sentence engineer will say in another company. this is how RL business works: client is always right - he brings money. And no, client will not pay billions "because R&D isn't free". Thats why you buy games for $10 EUR and not for $10000 EUR each.
|

Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
29
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 08:53:00 -
[90] - Quote
Alara IonStorm wrote:Kryss Darkdust wrote:The reason suicide ganking exists is the unrealistic outcome of insurance pay outs. Not even in a fantasy distant future would anyone pay an insurance claim of someone who committed a crime and lost his ship in the process, its stupid. All CCP needed to do was invalidate insurance if you are blown up by concord if they are so concerned about sucide ganking. Insurance for Suicide Gankers has been removed since Crucible.
Hmm news to me, but than again, I don't sucide gank. In that case I'm confused how sucide gankers profit in any way? Seems like a complete loss and waste of time. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |