Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 39 post(s) |
Nekromung7
Gallente Rogue Star Orion Technical Coalition Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 05:56:00 -
[211]
Awesome!! I love it!! Nekro Death |
This Suxbad
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 07:22:00 -
[212]
love it... all i ask for is a option to view only want to buy.
|
Xantor Bludberry
Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 07:51:00 -
[213]
So give us new NeoCom option new. We want it!
|
Cresalle
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 09:17:00 -
[214]
Edited by: Cresalle on 28/01/2011 09:24:55 Edited by: Cresalle on 28/01/2011 09:18:54 Looked over the new search feature and I have only 2 issues. First and foremost why the hell are you using this necro thread for feedback (as if I have to ask). Apart from that in the old search I can turn on "simple view" under "sort by" and get a far more useful display that doesn't have to load up a bunch of icons that I don't care about. Please add this feature to the new search, preferably somewhere more intelligent than in the "sort by" options.
A question, the blog mentioned a contract copying mechanism. Is this not implemented yet or am I just not finding it?
Overall this looks decent.
Originally by: This Suxbad love it... all i ask for is a option to view only want to buy.
Just set max price to 1 isk for that ----------------------- Edit: Nevermind, they ****ed it up so that you can only set limits in million isk units. WTF, guys?
|
Lex Avril
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 10:43:00 -
[215]
Edited by: Lex Avril on 28/01/2011 10:44:02 looking for the item, the blueprint shows up in the list as well, I see no way to show the item only
edit: typo
|
Tempralis
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 12:53:00 -
[216]
Not liking the new beta contract system. As one guy said earlier in the thread you want simple information presented, no need to pretty it up! Also the new contract system has a delay on global searches, you click search for contracts from all regions and takes about 20-30 seconds to refresh with new contracts? The old system was more responsive! It shows you contracts as they are posted in every region. Why fix the old system when it wasn't broken in the first place?
|
Andreii
Caldari 20th Legion Sodalitas XX
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 13:06:00 -
[217]
Edited by: Andreii on 28/01/2011 13:08:29 Lets give an example:
Old system:
Click get contracts from all regions sorted by when they were issued. Get a 'to the second' report of the global contracts. Click get contracts again get a new list of contracts.
New system:
Click search get a list of all contracts from all regions. Click search again to see new contracts and they don't appear? Click on get contracts from the old system and there are about 5 new contracts issued. Click on search on the beta system and it hasn't updated with the new contracts issued in the last minute or so? Is this intended to put less stress on the contract system? It's as if you get a set of global contracts sent to the client which is only updated once every 30 seconds to a minute! I want up to date contract searches that refresh as they are created, don't need delay! What's the deal with this ccp?
|
Jurimaru
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 13:50:00 -
[218]
Oh I love the new contracts engine, it's fairly fast and comfortable to use. I would suggest to enable user to choose large or small icons so that more contracts (literaly - lines referencing contracts) fit in the same window size.
Thanks for a good feature!
|
Skyreth
StarFleet Enterprises Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 14:02:00 -
[219]
Wondering, what about the rest of the NeoCom?
You think your lag is bad? It took Jesus 3 days to respawn! |
Rawgni
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 14:20:00 -
[220]
The new search gives much much more options for contractors.. and thats avesome but i found few mising things.
1. How to search only auctions? I was using it a lot in old system and its impossible to do that now. (mayby add another l33t option for that) 2. Could you please fix grid in '[Want to Buy]' windows.. You should be able to rigth click on items there and have usual menu with 'Show Info, View markets details, Find in contratcs' etc.. as in sell window grid.. 3. Wildcards... that would be awesome.. 4. More l33t options like multi search like 'Raven,Capacitor Control Circuit' 5. Sorting by price (in hidden simple view, im not sure how its working in normal one) is sorting auctions by starting bid not actual prices (It show correct price) 6. Sorting orders and all other settings are not saved 7. In simple wiev its impossible to see difference between auction and Item Exchange
|
|
Xidae
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 15:08:00 -
[221]
Great work. The new contract set up is easier to use. Even for dinosaurs who prefer pen and paper. If I can use it anyone can.
|
Aureus
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 15:29:00 -
[222]
I would like to reiterate the request to be able to search for only blueprint (original) as opposed to blueprint (copy)
Otherwise so far so good
|
Amarra Thie
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 15:42:00 -
[223]
I would like to be able to sort by Titles.
|
el alasar
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 16:24:00 -
[224]
Edited by: el alasar on 28/01/2011 16:32:49 a little more pretty, and this is missing:
- export + save a search query as a link - ability to define a search query including "AND" for several items / item names (e.g. 2 items having the same attributes, but search by name does not work well, say you want contracts for centus and corpus large reppers but not core reppers) - if you have a single item in contract list shown, add "create/setup contract" to the context menu for that contract, so could e.g. set up a buy contract easily - make drag and drop work to add "requested items from buyer" (drop a contract there / drop items there), so no more need to type |
el alasar
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 16:54:00 -
[225]
bug: when setting sort by price + ascending, only contracts with positive prices are sorted, not "want to buy" contracts |
Tzulu
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 17:09:00 -
[226]
Search by description is an absolute must.
Hope you will implement it, during the next update. |
el alasar
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 17:39:00 -
[227]
"search by description" - care to elaborate the use of that? what am i missing?
more ideas: - add column "quantity" and fill it if a specific item is searched, will reduce scams considerably - add search filter "system sec status", so e.g. low/null can be excluded |
K'tanno
Zero Point Group
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:21:00 -
[228]
I really like the new contracts search. But I'd like it to remember the things I've selected for the earch options, and when searching all regions, you need to be able to sort by jumps. |
Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 19:25:00 -
[229]
Ok, so far looks good and I'm loving it, here's a few things I've noticed that I think aren't working as intended:
*When Listing by price WTB orders with highest pay are listed on the bottom, thats probably because of the negative sign
*When you type in the item type, the list for selecting exactly which item you meant comes up when you hit the search button, not when you switch focus from the field in the old contracts.
I thought there was also a bug with the price filter but then I realized it's in Millions, so ooops, my bad :)
|
Swynet
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 20:50:00 -
[230]
Awesome, just add the sub menus:
Item category
Item group
And it will be perfect imo.
|
|
Oche Firestar
Silent Knight Industries - Virtual Tech
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 21:08:00 -
[231]
When moving to the next page after having got to the bottom of a page it would be nice if it automatically moved to show the top of the new page and not the bottom.
|
Kirichan
|
Posted - 2011.01.28 23:53:00 -
[232]
It'd be nice if you could search for BPO's without having to sort through all the BPC's.
|
Psycho IB
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 01:24:00 -
[233]
I like the general layout. its easily navacable.
It would nice to have a quantity column for ex:[Want to Buy/sell] x1, x2, or x3 so its eaiser to find adaquate quantities rather than having sift through 20 contracts to find one asking for or selling more than one primarly in PLEX, but would be good for just about everything being contracted.
it would also be nice to be able sort a primary column and a secondary column. So you can set primary as Name and group all similar items togather then sort by price to get high to low on different items, maybe even be able to search a group of items, like shields rather than just a specific shield by name.
|
Lederstrumpf
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 02:41:00 -
[234]
Edited by: Lederstrumpf on 29/01/2011 02:44:26
Originally by: Lederstrumpf Old simple view:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/5664/ishot349.png
Beta Search:
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1200/ishot348.png
And the rant continues... COLUMN arrangement.
Old view was arranged like this:
STUFF TYPE ISSUER TIME PRICE LOCATION
This was quite friendly to the eyes: You can visually parse it easily from the sides inwards: Start left ..read STUFF ... jump to end of line .... then parse LOCATION & PRICE backwards. Taking the outer borders as "visual fixpoints" your eyes have to "travel inwards" 1 column at maximum to get a grasp of the most important stuff easily.
The Search Beta columns are arranged different:
STUFF LOCATION PRICE JUMPS TIME ISSUER
The problem here is PRICE is quite in the middle, 2 columns in, followed by plenty of other numbers and strings. This is disturbing and harder to parse for the human eye.
Now to the column content itself:
1. Having region information right below system name wrecks havoc on any attempt to visually group the vertical LOCATION column cell content easily. If you want to display region information, do it in a new column instead ! Or at least display it on the side of the System name, but not under it!! What's the red color for? Is region information super important? The tiny system security color code dot: Way less useful than a clear numerical display could be. How about getting rid of the dot and using dot color as system name text color instead? And going numerical values, too?! It'd enlighten color blind players and would allow sorting by security level as well.
2. PRICE column: There's a simple reason to have numbers align right, not left: It adds to the readability. So have numbers align to the right cell side. Makes comparing vertical cell content way easier!!! What other than ISK is there to pay with? Exotic dancers? Repeating "ISK" in every cell is redundant and adds useless bytes you gotta pass with your eyes. Put "ISK" in the column header once instead!
3. JUMPS AWAY -- it's nice to be able to sort by jump distance now. But similar to 2.): "jumps away" is a redundant cell string. Get rid of it. A descriptive column header is all it needs. Put the number in brackets if you wish... something like this: | Jita | (3) |
4. CONTRACT column. People love you for finally having an indication whether it's a BPC or BPO. But please: Use another color, grey or whatever, for the "(copy)" string part, as it's not part of the item name itself but additional info. If copy/original info would get an own column one could sort by it, too.
5. This one is a biggie: ITEM THUMBNAIL LOADING IS SLOWING ME DOWN. Yes I am shouting at you. Thumbnail image loading results in lag & stuttering when trying to use the vertical scrollbar. Visual eye-candy for folks who can not read. Well. Some buyers might need them. So please, please, please: Add a setup option to disable display of item thumbnail pictures!! Usability > eye-candy, you remember? It's no candy if it slows things down. It's a bitter pill. And it has another negative side effect:
6. Compare both pictures. Old simple view had like 30 contract columns on display. New one is down to like 17 contracts. So there's like only half the information presented like it used to be in the old simple view. This is a loss. You force people to click more to get the same data presented. This is crippling. Thumbnail icon height is to blame. Again: Make display of thumbnail icons optional. Thank you, thank you!
Here's another suggestion some folks might kiss your feet for:
1. Give the user free choice to setup the contract column horizontal arrangement order. Be it PRICE, LOCATION or LOCATION, PRICE or whatever!
2. Add an option to not display some columns. "ISSUER? Who cares, let me get rid of it!" "REGION? I know them all, let me get rid of it!" ....
|
StoneVein
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 03:36:00 -
[235]
when sorting by price, negative amounts are not sorted properly.
gist x-type x-large shield booster, 800million want to buy is in the middle of list, rather than at bottom where I would have expected the highest offer to be. |
Goose69
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 04:09:00 -
[236]
I like the changes... Makes trying to find stuff so much easier... thanks. Many times I just check contracts to see how much stuff is selling for when I sell to friends etc, so being able to find things quicker is a big help.
|
SheriffFruitfly
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 10:20:00 -
[237]
Edited by: SheriffFruitfly on 29/01/2011 10:24:05 It's about time.
I guess the only thing missing is some kind of autocomplete implementation for the search term. To re-use code you already have, copy/paste from the autolink code.
edit: Rightclicking a contract assigned to me should have a Location sub-menu (like when you right click a market purchase in your wallet), so I can set dest without having to actually open up the contract. __________________________________________________________ Please resize your signature to the maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |
satans own
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 10:49:00 -
[238]
very very good. New set up is great.
|
Jaqu
Stray Dogs
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 13:33:00 -
[239]
Horrible. Why? Because 98% of the contracts are scams. I simply cant be arsed to sift through hundreds of fake contracts made by alts. What a joke, back to the drawning board.
|
Tempralis
|
Posted - 2011.01.29 14:14:00 -
[240]
Edited by: Tempralis on 29/01/2011 14:15:09 There is an update bug in the global search engine for the beta contract system. If you click search ordered date issued it gives you a snapshot off all the contracts issued at that point in time. If you then click again about 30 seconds later the list hasn't been updated with all the new contracts? If you look on the old system there have been about 10 or more contracts issued in the 30 second window. Will this bug be fixed?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |