EVE Search - Most OP cruiser?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Most OP cruiser?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Dorian Tormak	Posted - 2010.12.31 19:00:00 - [31] lol you guys are idiots haha laughable dps /explodes
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2010.12.31 19:15:00 - [32] Originally by: Dorian Tormak lol you guys are idiots haha laughable dps /explodes Are you saying a stabber or even multiple stabbers can actually break the tank of something not a frigate as it kites out at 20km? haha laughable comment /explodes
Omara Otawan	Posted - 2010.12.31 21:27:00 - [33] Stabber is a great ship if you want to get soloed by a frigate in your cruiser. As far as ranged dps in a kiting setup goes, the bellicose does that better.
Dorian Tormak	Posted - 2010.12.31 22:01:00 - [34] Edited by: Dorian Tormak on 31/12/2010 22:03:19 The stabber is faster, has more ehp, has more dps than many frigates, and has a drone as well as neuts. Compared to any frigate a stabber is a nightmare, I would way rather fight a rupture in my frig. Rupture is good... but the stabber can choose his targets, and while he may not be able to break an active myrm or something (rupture can though right?), still has got enough dps to kill a lot of targets. For what, 10 - 15 mil for the fit and ship? E - Kite belli's drones do a lot of dps, which are killable, and unless you're using missiles (no neuts = fail fit), the stabbers guns outdps the belli's guns.
Omara Otawan	Posted - 2010.12.31 22:11:00 - [35] Edited by: Omara Otawan on 31/12/2010 22:14:36 Oh yea, that drone is gonna devastate my rifter while its orbiting you, using your cap to fuel my scrambler... Rather fight a Rupture in a frigate than a Stabber? You are trolling, right? Edit: The Bellicose also get twice the EHP compared to stabber, so even if we assume its drones are instantly destroyed (LOL), or never deployed (ROFL), it will have put more damage on target in the end before it has to leave. It also has a credible frigate defense.
Tarn Reis	Posted - 2010.12.31 23:41:00 - [36] +1 Stabber. It's not fantastic, and it's not often my first choice for cruiser PvP, but it's fast enough to choose its targets, and has range enough to screw around with people who haven't gotten the "blaster's are junk" memo and still jump into thoraxs, or poor brutix and harbinger pilots. More importantly, though, it's fun to fly.
Lady Skank Ban Evasion inc	Posted - 2010.12.31 23:51:00 - [37] Originally by: Omara Otawan As far as ranged dps in a kiting setup goes, the bellicose does that better. The Bellicose is fantastic fitted with LSEs and used as a kiting AC boat and is much better at it than a Stabber, not many people realise it though.
fuxinos Caldari Guys 0f Sarcasm	Posted - 2011.01.01 00:00:00 - [38] For me its Scythe and Celestis. Scythe because of its (LOL) 3.5% Tracking link efficency bonus and Celestis because it looks like an ageing banana.
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.01 09:28:00 - [39] Originally by: Tarn Reis harbinger pilots. If a harb can't kill a stabber at the optimal range of scorch then he must have forgotten every skill that matters past the ones that let him fit scorch.
Pod Amarr	Posted - 2011.01.01 13:10:00 - [40] Originally by: Kyo Haku I'd say the Caracal. It can get the strongest pure buffer tank of any T1 cruiser (maybe faction too, haven't tried) while retaining a good damage output. 22k shield HP? Yes please. i would like to see that setup please

Zattakar	Posted - 2011.01.01 13:55:00 - [41] Originally by: Nanferr maller. This is the only cruiser capable of bringing in many many tears. Yea for the pilot of the maller
Space Pinata Amarr Discount Napkin Industries	Posted - 2011.01.01 14:45:00 - [42] How has no one mentioned the Vexor yet? The 2 ogre, 2 hammer, 1 hob setup with a 1600 plate and trimarks can spit out 450~ dps (small autocannons etc) while tanking close to 40k.. It's basically a battlecruiser in cruiser form.
Kyo Haku Minmatar Murientor Tribe	Posted - 2011.01.01 15:29:00 - [43] Originally by: Pod Amarr Originally by: Kyo Haku I'd say the Caracal. It can get the strongest pure buffer tank of any T1 cruiser (maybe faction too, haven't tried) while retaining a good damage output. 22k shield HP? Yes please. i would like to see that setup please Ask and thou shalt receive. [Caracal, Rofltank] Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II 10MN Analog Booster Rockets Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Warrior I x2 I wanted to see how strong a tank I could actually get on this thing. With my skills, a smidge over 22k shield HP (not EHP). An invuln brings EHP (not shield hp) up to 50k+, but it's slow as hell. Still is with an AB, but 450 m/s is better than 215. In practice I'd drop down to meta and fit a scram or disruptor- I think this would make a sturdy baitship for frigate gangs. -- "Far be it from me to stand in judgment. I prefer to sit." -Stephen Colbert
Medidranda Livoga	Posted - 2011.01.01 15:54:00 - [44] Blackbird is best T1 cruiser for gangs. For solo, most of them are pretty lousy or merely adequate. Rupture probably is best generalist one (can do 1vs1 or gangs).
James Lyrus Lyrus Associates The Star Fraction	Posted - 2011.01.01 16:47:00 - [45] Originally by: Kyo Haku Originally by: Pod Amarr Originally by: Kyo Haku I'd say the Caracal. It can get the strongest pure buffer tank of any T1 cruiser (maybe faction too, haven't tried) while retaining a good damage output. 22k shield HP? Yes please. i would like to see that setup please Ask and thou shalt receive. [Caracal, Rofltank] Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II 10MN Analog Booster Rockets Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Warrior I x2 I wanted to see how strong a tank I could actually get on this thing. With my skills, a smidge over 22k shield HP (not EHP). An invuln brings EHP (not shield hp) up to 50k+, but it's slow as hell. Still is with an AB, but 450 m/s is better than 215. In practice I'd drop down to meta and fit a scram or disruptor- I think this would make a sturdy baitship for frigate gangs. ... and where's the "good damage output"?
Cipher Jones Minmatar	Posted - 2011.01.01 17:26:00 - [46] The cynabal obviously. Its the little Mach and the Mach is OP as hell.
Kn1v3s 999 Gallente Gung-Ho Guns	Posted - 2011.01.01 17:37:00 - [47] Faction/Pirate: Cynabal T1: Rupture
Duchess Starbuckington	Posted - 2011.01.01 19:07:00 - [48] Originally by: Kyo Haku Failfit Caracal Bahahahahahahahahaha. Nice troll. _________________________________ ROCKET STATUS: FIX IN PROGRESS...
Kyo Haku Minmatar Murientor Tribe	Posted - 2011.01.01 19:45:00 - [49] Originally by: James Lyrus ... and where's the "good damage output"? Gets 500+ volley damage with good skills, so it's not terrible but it's not stellar either. TBH I'd never fly this setup in a PVE setting. The only time I'd consider undocking it is as bait, and it wouldn't have T2 fittings on it. Originally by: Duchess Starbuckington Originally by: Kyo Haku Failfit Caracal Bahahahahahahahahaha. Nice troll. More EFT warrioring than troll, TBH. -- "Far be it from me to stand in judgment. I prefer to sit." -Stephen Colbert
Zhim'Fufu	Posted - 2011.01.01 20:06:00 - [50] Originally by: Kyo Haku More EFT warrioring than troll, TBH. Is there really any practical difference? But to be specific it's the booster rockets. Thats a 50 mil mod. Oh and the lack of any tackle at all so its a bait ship that can't hold what it catches so the target simply warps away when local spikes. Oh and the terrible resists so anything spewing some em and thermal will eat your tank up with a quickness and probably pop you before the gang can get to you.

Duchess Starbuckington	Posted - 2011.01.01 20:33:00 - [51] Quote: More EFT warrioring than troll, TBH. Oh so you really are just clueless. Ok. Joke of a fit right there. _________________________________ ROCKET STATUS: FIX IN PROGRESS...
Skanthra Minmatar Bath and Body Works Bed Bath and Beyond	Posted - 2011.01.01 22:14:00 - [52] Originally by: Duchess Starbuckington Quote: More EFT warrioring than troll, TBH. Oh so you really are just clueless. Ok. Joke of a fit right there. Storyline AB ftw. Quote: CCP Veritas > Prepare for Megahelldeath! 21:19:10 Combat - CCP Veritas hits you, doing 45117.1 damage.
Kyo Haku Minmatar Murientor Tribe	Posted - 2011.01.02 00:58:00 - [53] Originally by: Zhim'Fufu Originally by: Kyo Haku More EFT warrioring than troll, TBH. Is there really any practical difference? But to be specific it's the booster rockets. Thats a 50 mil mod. Oh and the lack of any tackle at all so its a bait ship that can't hold what it catches so the target simply warps away when local spikes. Oh and the terrible resists so anything spewing some em and thermal will eat your tank up with a quickness and probably pop you before the gang can get to you. Really? I didn't know they were that much. I don't really care which AB is used, I just picked one. In the posted fit I was going for maximum tank possible- as I said, I wouldn't use T2 on a bait ship, and a tackle is obviously needed. EM and therm hole is very large, but as most of what my FW corp does is cruiser and below, I'm not worried about 20k worth of shields being eaten too fast- especially since fleet will be in next system most likely. I'm not saying it's a practical fit, or that it should be flown- I just thought it up for fun and think it would be interesting to try out sometime. -- "Far be it from me to stand in judgment. I prefer to sit." -Stephen Colbert
Aamrr	Posted - 2011.01.02 10:03:00 - [54] 34.3k EHP and actually fits a fscking tackle module. If you can skip the tackle module, swap the EM-resist rig for another extender and fit a photon scattering field. You'll get the same 44k EHP figure without the gaping EM hole and without fitting a 50 million isk afterburner. [Caracal, LessFail] Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile 10MN Afterburner II Warp Scrambler II Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Damage Control II Ballistic Control System II Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Warrior II x2
Gypsio III Dirty Filthy Perverts	Posted - 2011.01.02 15:56:00 - [55] Originally by: Aamrr [Caracal, LessFail] Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Bloodclaw Light Missile 10MN Afterburner II Warp Scrambler II Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Damage Control II Ballistic Control System II Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Warrior II x2 lol
Mavnas	Posted - 2011.01.02 16:16:00 - [56] Originally by: Kneebone You have to look at the line up beyond who would win in a 1v1. The cruiser line up includes EWAR ships, Logi/Indy ships, and Combat ships. Would a Rupture own an OSprey? Sure would, but can it outmine the Osprey? Sure it can. Step 1: Own the Osprey Step 2: Step 3: Profit!
Mavnas	Posted - 2011.01.02 16:20:00 - [57] Originally by: Kyo Haku Originally by: Pod Amarr Originally by: Kyo Haku I'd say the Caracal. It can get the strongest pure buffer tank of any T1 cruiser (maybe faction too, haven't tried) while retaining a good damage output. 22k shield HP? Yes please. i would like to see that setup please Ask and thou shalt receive. [Caracal, Rofltank] Ballistic Control System II Damage Control II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II 10MN Analog Booster Rockets Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Upgraded 'Limos' Standard Missile Bay I, Sabretooth Light Missile Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Medium Core Defence Field Extender I Warrior I x2 I wanted to see how strong a tank I could actually get on this thing. With my skills, a smidge over 22k shield HP (not EHP). An invuln brings EHP (not shield hp) up to 50k+, but it's slow as hell. Still is with an AB, but 450 m/s is better than 215. In practice I'd drop down to meta and fit a scram or disruptor- I think this would make a sturdy baitship for frigate gangs. You could drop the 4th extender and replace it with an invuln and gain more EHP. Also: [Moa, LolFit] Power Diagnostic System II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II 10MN Afterburner II 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M [empty high slot] Medium Core Defence Field Purger I Medium Core Defence Field Purger I Medium Core Defence Field Purger I Hobgoblin II x3 That has more EHP (when you replace the purgers with extenders), and has the benefit of actually using cruiser weapons lol.
Aamrr	Posted - 2011.01.02 18:36:00 - [58] Edited by: Aamrr on 02/01/2011 18:37:28 Originally by: Gypsio III Originally by: Aamrr <snip> lol So fit a MWD instead and swap the scram for a little more CPU. It's not like you don't have the grid for it. Smartass.
Kyo Haku Minmatar Murientor Tribe	Posted - 2011.01.02 19:01:00 - [59] Originally by: Aamrr Actual fit Thats pretty much what I use actually, cept I generally use meta instead of T2, and disruptor instead of scram. -- "Far be it from me to stand in judgment. I prefer to sit." -Stephen Colbert
Aamrr	Posted - 2011.01.02 19:13:00 - [60] Originally by: Kyo Haku Originally by: Aamrr Actual fit Thats pretty much what I use actually, cept I generally use meta instead of T2, and disruptor instead of scram. Or that. I was trying to stay more or less true to the fit that was given. Either propulsion/point combo works.



Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.