Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 09:05:00 -
[1]
those were better days
|
|
CCP Spitfire
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 09:11:00 -
[2]
Moved from 'EVE General Discussion'.
Spitfire Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online |
|
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 09:14:00 -
[3]
thank you, my apologies
|
Flapkonijn
BLACK LIGHTNING MINING CREW
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 09:29:00 -
[4]
+1 Totally Agree...
|
Nisshoku
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 11:24:00 -
[5]
yeah, I usually clicked people I wanted to be more aware of. so their portrait would be more of a visual hint that someone I was looking for turned up in my system. people I don't care about should stay anon ;P |
Gavjack Bunk
Gallente Dark Nexxus S I L E N T.
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 13:16:00 -
[6]
I used unloaded avatars as a tool in the endless struggle to determine who was following me, and who was not.
Well I guess it's now harder for everybody, including my prey.
|
Kruddcake
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 14:47:00 -
[7]
Agreed, I only clicked on the avatars of people I wanted to watch / track / know about.
I don't mind how it works now, loading every portrait. However, I would vote in favour of needing to manually load portraits again if it came down to a poll.
|
Ydyp Ieva
Caldari Amarrian Retribution
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 15:13:00 -
[8]
I used it for a quick way to check if I had the person checked already in the near past. But well I'm not really that worried about the current working way.
However I'm missing the capture option, or was it gone for longer? ---------------------------------- None of yet! |
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 17:49:00 -
[9]
It was always finicky before anyway, half the time ports would unload and mess everything up. At least now show info doesn't lag as much.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ |
Nika Dekaia
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 17:58:00 -
[10]
Local beeing less of an intel tool is not a bad thing, actually.
|
|
Fulbert
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 17:59:00 -
[11]
No more portrait capture, but now we load the happy face of any podpilot or agent we encounter They really want us to lag. -------------------------------- Fulbert. Miner - Industrialist |
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 19:00:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Nika Dekaia Local beeing less of an intel tool is not a bad thing, actually.
i know youll just tell me to upgrade but i can hear an audible groan when i jump into a system with 100 + people
|
Smithwick O'Flaherty
Kung Fu Treachery
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 19:47:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Smithwick O''Flaherty on 19/01/2011 19:57:08 I think a great idea is to make it an option in the settings on whether or not you allow all portraits to load when entering system
|
Allataria
Caldari EdgeGamers
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:01:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Allataria on 19/01/2011 20:02:11
Originally by: Smithwick O'Flaherty Edited by: Smithwick O''Flaherty on 19/01/2011 19:57:08 I think a great idea is to make it an option in the settings on whether or not you allow all portraits to load when entering system
+1
It actually bugs me when the avatars dont load or sometimes they do for people in my corp and other days they dont and I have to go thru clicking them all.
|
Neo Cortex
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:06:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Smithwick O'Flaherty Edited by: Smithwick O''Flaherty on 19/01/2011 19:57:08 I think a great idea is to make it an option in the settings on whether or not you allow all portraits to load when entering system
+1
|
Mr Mvoice
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:21:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Smithwick O'Flaherty Edited by: Smithwick O''Flaherty on 19/01/2011 19:57:08 I think a great idea is to make it an option in the settings on whether or not you allow all portraits to load when entering system
+1
|
Manalapan
Dynasty Banking General Tso's Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:33:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Fulbert No more portrait capture, but now we load the happy face of any podpilot or agent we encounter They really want us to lag.
Well how much lag is it causing? I will probably get on later to test the bandwidth use of EVE as I login to Jita and compare it with some past bookmarks to see if it a large enough change to generate lag. Support Manalapan for CSM!
We must stand together against the oppressive neo-carebears. A vote for Manalapan is a vote for Scammers and Griefers everywhere!
http://www.dyco-eve.com/Manal |
Scorpionidae
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:38:00 -
[18]
+1 Now I don't know who I've scammed in Jita.
Scorpionidae
|
Rupicolous
Higher Ground
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 20:43:00 -
[19]
My 8 gigs are precious, no matter how small the footprint is.
|
Mazlow Shartain
Omega Wing Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 21:27:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Smithwick O'Flaherty Edited by: Smithwick O''Flaherty on 19/01/2011 19:57:08 I think a great idea is to make it an option in the settings on whether or not you allow all portraits to load when entering system
+1
|
|
Emperor Salazar
Caldari Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:31:00 -
[21]
I think eve players should complain more.
|
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:43:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Emperor Salazar I think eve players should complain more.
eve players should also come into the features and ideas section and troll more
just sayin
|
Emperor Salazar
Caldari Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:44:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Potamus Jenkins
Originally by: Emperor Salazar I think eve players should complain more.
eve players should also come into the features and ideas section and troll more
just sayin
you posted this in General Discussion you moron
a dev had to move it for you
|
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:46:00 -
[24]
and if it were still in general discussion id be giving you thumbs up for your bushleague trolling attempt
but it aint.
move on, amature
|
Emperor Salazar
Caldari Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:48:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Potamus Jenkins
and if it were still in general discussion id be giving you thumbs up for your bushleague trolling attempt
but it aint.
move on, amature
look at you respond to and validate my trolling
getting played by a troll, how you feel?
|
Serge Bastana
Gallente GWA Corp
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 22:50:00 -
[26]
+1, it should be our choice if we a: want the extra bandwidth hit from downloading every stupid scammer in Jita local, or any other system you pass through and b: actually see them all anyway. ------------------------------------------------ Quafe is people! |
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 23:09:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Manalapan
Originally by: Fulbert No more portrait capture, but now we load the happy face of any podpilot or agent we encounter They really want us to lag.
Well how much lag is it causing? I will probably get on later to test the bandwidth use of EVE as I login to Jita and compare it with some past bookmarks to see if it a large enough change to generate lag.
i also think there may be a difference between server lag (latency) and client lag (graphical)
but i know not of these things
|
Allataria
Caldari EdgeGamers
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 23:16:00 -
[28]
Originally by: Emperor Salazar I think eve players should complain more.
Lonetrek Salvage & Scrap trolls better than you ....
|
Emperor Salazar
Caldari Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 23:17:00 -
[29]
Its not causing any server lag. If you read the dev blog you would know how it functions:
Quote: This means that the client isn't loading graphic assets and running rendering code for characters in the background while you are flying in space, it will just fetch the character portraits via the internet as if you were browsing a web page. This also means that the client doesn't have to ask the server for characters appearances in order to render them, so we are freeing up server resources too. We also offload all the bandwidth to our Content Delivery Network (CDN) so that we aren't using up the link to Tranquility with requests for images - and as all requests for images go to our CDN it should be extremely fast wherever you are in the world.
|
Potamus Jenkins
The Nintendo Generation Snatch Victory
|
Posted - 2011.01.19 23:26:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Emperor Salazar Its not causing any server lag. If you read the dev blog you would know how it functions:
Quote: This means that the client isn't loading graphic assets and running rendering code for characters in the background while you are flying in space, it will just fetch the character portraits via the internet as if you were browsing a web page. This also means that the client doesn't have to ask the server for characters appearances in order to render them, so we are freeing up server resources too. We also offload all the bandwidth to our Content Delivery Network (CDN) so that we aren't using up the link to Tranquility with requests for images - and as all requests for images go to our CDN it should be extremely fast wherever you are in the world.
wow look at you you've come a long way my friend
adding useful content to a thread, im a little choked up here i need a minute to recover
ok now that it has passed that pretty much rules out latency but poor me and my sorry computer still seem to be having issues when jumping into system(compared to before the pics would load)
so maybe this is accounted for by processing/gpu issues i am having on the client side? with loading all the pictures at once? im not a very techy person so i think we are in the perfect place to hash it out sanz trolling, oh, oops too late!
now we have come full circle. wouldnt it be great to choose not to load them at all? is that even a viable option? who knows but maybe we will find out!
hey look at that we are in the features and ideas section and someone suggested that in this here post.
i guess im not a completely worthless human being after all.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |