EVE Search - Ishukone-Raata Enforcement Directive [I-RED]: Anti-Booster ANN Release

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

Ishukone-Raata Enforcement Directive [I-RED]: Anti-Booster ANN Release

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Xenos Giger Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 21:14:00 - [1] The Ishukone-Raata Enforcement Directive [I-RED]: Anti-Booster ANN Release The following is a official release made by the Ishukone-Raata Pharmaceutical Research and Production in regards to the ANN article "Intaki Anti-Booster Initiative Backfires". On 11.21.112 YC Ishukone-Raata released declassified information in regards to Pharmaceutical Production in the Intaki Solar System. In attempts to hinder/slow Serpentis Corporation, independent through "Economical Interdiction Operations" to reduce the availability of raw materials in the Placid, Solitude, and Intaki Syndicate Regions. Now in regards to the ANN article written by Seki Ebura hosting the title "Intaki Anti-Booster Initiative Backfires", as head Director of the Ishukone-Raata Pharmaceutical Research and Production Department I find this article rather disturbing and slanderous, with the intent to attack the standing in the public eye. Indeed it is very easy to point the finger of blame to one of the few capsuleer organizations attempting to counter the capabilities of known organizations that harbor known criminals of the Caldari State. It is even more surprising that these accusations of a "Backfire" of operational status come to sight with any actual factual evidence. Now I would like to set a few details strait in regards to Ishukone-Raata's production of Synthetic Combat Enhancing Pharmaceuticals. First off Ishukone-Raata does not sell any of the created Synth products in the Placid, or Solitude regions. 95% of our produced stocks are exported to the Jita Solar System, and sold to fill major defense contracts, the remainder is used internally for Alliance Combat Personnel. As for the sales in Intaki, Ishukone-Raata Intellegence is already looking into who is making such sales in the area. Xenos Giger Taisa-Captain Pharmaceutical Research and Production Director
Proxy Proximae	Posted - 2011.01.20 21:27:00 - [2] So, you guys are basically admitting that you're hypocrites when it comes to lowering and/or stopping booster production and sales anywhere let alone intaki? "We'll stop the drug lords... only to become the new ones". The article is hardly slanderous. Especially when you admit that your pilots are addicts themselves.
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 21:36:00 - [3] Originally by: Proxy Proximae So, you guys are basically admitting that you're hypocrites when it comes to lowering and/or stopping booster production and sales anywhere let alone intaki? "We'll stop the drug lords... only to become the new ones". The article is hardly slanderous. Especially when you admit that your pilots are addicts themselves. "Economical Interdiction Operations to reduce the availability of raw materials in the Placid, Solitude, and Intaki Syndicate Regions." Quote by Giger-haan. At least try to understand... Proxy, business may be beyond you.
Proxy Proximae	Posted - 2011.01.20 21:40:00 - [4] From an outside perspective, it doesn't matter if you're 'reducing the raw material' by mining it, refining it into drugs and selling it elsewhere. It actually sounds very similar to the Serpentis modus operandi, you may be squeezing into their niche but it doesn't make you any nobler for taking up the mantle of their activities.
Milo Caman Gallente Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.20 21:51:00 - [5] Originally by: John Revenent "Economical Interdiction Operations to reduce the availability of raw materials in the Placid, Solitude, and Intaki Syndicate Regions." Quote by Giger-haan. At least try to understand... Proxy, business may be beyond you. You do understand that the majority of boosters sold in this area do not have their resources sourced locally? And that Gas clouds are in such abundance in said areas that you could harvest till the cows come home and not make a dent in them? Oh, and the fact that not once during my time in Placid, Syndicate and Solitude have I seen, or had reports of IRED gas harvesting operations. You're evidently experts at hiding. ---
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 22:03:00 - [6] Originally by: Milo Caman You do understand that the majority of boosters sold in this area do not have their resources sourced locally? And that Gas clouds are in such abundance in said areas that you could harvest till the cows come home and not make a dent in them? Oh, and the fact that not once during my time in Placid, Syndicate and Solitude have I seen, or had reports of IRED gas harvesting operations. You're evidently experts at hiding. Mr Caman, you should understand that just because you are unable to see something does not mean it happen.. Also you of all people should be aware we stimulate the market by creating jobs for pilots as Gas harvesting is a legit business, and Ishukone-Raata does hire contractors who fill orders for our operations. Maybe your intelligence network may not be as expansive as you thought, as three regions is hard to cover when such operations can only last so long..
Milo Caman Gallente Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.20 22:06:00 - [7] Edited by: Milo Caman on 20/01/2011 22:06:06 Originally by: John Revenent Maybe your intelligence network may not be as expansive as you thought, as three regions is hard to cover when such operations can only last so long.. You'd be surprised. ---
Senn Typhos Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.20 22:23:00 - [8] ANN is a media group, in a free market of journalism. Anyone who places themselves in the public sphere is subject to scrutiny, skepticism, what have you. If you didn't want attention, you should have considered the ramifications of publicly announcing intentions to kill off the competition, literally and figuratively. Being held accountable is simply the consequence. If you have a problem with our article, you're free to contact our legal team. If you have a problem with the Serpentis Corporation, perhaps you should allocate more than a Badger to Intaki to assist your allies. Otherwise, I suggest your corporation reconsider their stance and decide if they're cut out for the job.
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 23:08:00 - [9] Originally by: Senn Typhos ANN is a media group, in a free market of journalism. Anyone who places themselves in the public sphere is subject to scrutiny, skepticism, what have you. If you didn't want attention, you should have considered the ramifications of publicly announcing intentions to kill off the competition, literally and figuratively. Being held accountable is simply the consequence. If you have a problem with our article, you're free to contact our legal team. If you have a problem with the Serpentis Corporation, perhaps you should allocate more than a Badger to Intaki to assist your allies. Otherwise, I suggest your corporation reconsider their stance and decide if they're cut out for the job. You misunderstand our reasoning to reply to this ANN article which I will add is not the only bias article directed toward Ishukone-Raata, the NEA article again attempts to demonize our organization, with very one sided and mostly baseless reporting by a Serpentis created "News Network". Only one of your journalists even make the attempt to contact all sides to write a proper story, the other instead contact planet-side representatives, and who knows if I were to make a baseless accusation your journalists may have gotten that testimony by gun-point. It's what you Serpentis do right?
Xenos Giger Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 23:20:00 - [10] Originally by: Senn Typhos perhaps you should allocate more than a Badger to Intaki to assist your allies.. I think thas the pos refuel ship you fail to catch everytime, Ive a Job to get done! Regards - Xenos
Xenos Giger Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 23:38:00 - [11] Originally by: Senn Typhos If you didn't want attention, you should have considered the ramifications of publicly announcing intentions to kill off the competition, literally and figuratively. Being held accountable is simply the consequence. There is also the fact that because we have had the resolve to publicly anounce what we are doing rather than conduct backhanded production brought the subject into the public limelights & no-one has put forward that that may be a contrtibuting factor to the recent rise in products on the local markets, capsuleers tend to be very good at filling what they think is a growing neiche market for profits. As it is there is only one major seller of drop synth in placid & that is not us. I shall not name names, go and buy one for your selves i think you will find it is a local resident with over half a billions worth for sale, but if your intelligence network is expansive as you say you must already know this.
Creetalor Caldari Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.20 23:43:00 - [12] Saisa, My name is Creedance Talor, Commander of the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive. I have seen the research facility and am currently in the voluntary test group on the side effects of synthetic boosters. I personally find the side effects of the synthetics to not have any effects on my combat abilities and the current side effects have not shown up in my tests so far, I have been exposed to the synthetics in low doses and infrequently. I have also not expressed any want for the higher grade combat enhancers or any other dependancy on boosters. I furthermore find it gives us a fighting power against the serpentis which are constantly boosted pilots, we have been able to fight them stronger even on days the side effects did not seem to hit them. Creedance Talor I-RED Chusa
Milo Caman Gallente Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.20 23:48:00 - [13] Edited by: Milo Caman on 20/01/2011 23:47:53 Originally by: John Revenent You misunderstand our reasoning to reply to this ANN article which I will add is not the only bias article directed toward Ishukone-Raata, the NEA article again attempts to demonize our organization, with very one sided and mostly baseless reporting by a Serpentis created "News Network". So are you going to do something about it? or are you going to keep complaining? Originally by: Xenos Giger I think thas the pos refuel ship you fail to catch everytime, Ive a Job to get done! You're assuming that frigate-sized hulls can engage under sentry fire? Well that explains a lot. It seems that your TaCom failed to teach you the basics of combat, as well as Radio Discipline, as we found out when we moved here. Two Rooks and a Hurricane chasing a covops I recall? Originally by: Xenos Giger As it is there is only one major seller of drop synth in placid & that is not us. I shall not name names, go and buy one for your selves i think you will find it is a local resident with over half a billions worth for sale, but if your intelligence network is expansive as you say you must already know this. I completely fail to see how this is relevant. I barely makes sense to start with. ---
Xenos Giger Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.21 00:07:00 - [14] Edited by: Xenos Giger on 21/01/2011 00:08:32 Originally by: Milo Caman Originally by: Xenos Giger As it is there is only one major seller of drop synth in placid & that is not us. I shall not name names, go and buy one for your selves i think you will find it is a local resident with over half a billions worth for sale, but if your intelligence network is expansive as you say you must already know this. I completely fail to see how this is relevant. I barely makes sense to start with. Its relevent because were accused of flooding the local markets with the stuff by the local press, get your factual statistics correct,
Sparkahn Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 01:20:00 - [15] Originally by: John Revenent You misunderstand our reasoning to reply to this ANN article which I will add is not the only bias article directed toward Ishukone-Raata, the NEA article again attempts to demonize our organization, with very one sided and mostly baseless reporting by a Serpentis created "News Network". Only one of your journalists even make the attempt to contact all sides to write a proper story, the other instead contact planet-side representatives, and who knows if I were to make a baseless accusation your journalists may have gotten that testimony by gun-point. It's what you Serpentis do right? Firstly, let us straighten the facts surrounding ANN. The news network was created independently some time ago, to report on news of importance to, but not restricted to, Heaven and Curse. ANN was then bought by Anshar Incorporated. AI changed the direction of ANN. This direction was one of open, controversial, but most importantly, interesting news articles designed to generate controversy and discussion. Needless to say, ANN has enjoyed much success with this change of direction, and it is in fact arguably the Netword's unique selling point. Those complaining about "one sided" reports are reminded that in a laissez-faire media industry such as our own, there are no regulations regarding who is to be portrayed in what manner; "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". It all depends on your point of view; after all, a good media company gives the people what they want, and does not strive to please every organisation it writes about. In addition, as stated, our articles are open source. Anyone can submit articles, and if in keeping with the modus operandi of the network, and of acceptable penmanship, will be submitted after editorial confirmation. Some of those whom have had their articles published are in no way affiliated with AI or Serpentis Corp, and thus may have been offended by your "it's what you Serpentis do right?" comment. IF you have particularly strong views, perhaps you would like to submit an article of your own in the future? It is important to note that ANN is a subsidiary of AI, not a branch of AI. Therefore, opinions and attitudes included in articles are not necessary the direct views of Anshar Incorporated, its employees, or any entity affiliated with the corporation.
Mammal Tafren Gallente Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative	Posted - 2011.01.21 05:00:00 - [16] I must say that I had previously thought highly of ANN and its reporting. I even warned off members of my organisation attacking AI personnel who have been operating in Placid due to their affilation with ANN. However, it appears that there is little that association with the Serpentis Corporation will not sully. Even a news organisation with such promise. This article, plus another that I have seen elsewhere, are poor journalism. After these, I may have to switch to Gutter Press. At least they don't pretend to be any more than they are.
Julianus Soter Gallente Moira.	Posted - 2011.01.21 06:27:00 - [17] Edited by: Julianus Soter on 21/01/2011 06:27:21 Mr. President Tafren, I doubt that you are in any position to levy accusations against a news organization. Your little plan got defeated. Please don't be a bad sport and moan about it on the IGS by accusing the ANN of calumny: an accusation, if made, requires actual evidence of it having occured.
Mammal Tafren Gallente Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative	Posted - 2011.01.21 07:05:00 - [18] Edited by: Mammal Tafren on 21/01/2011 07:05:55 Originally by: Julianus Soter Mr. President Tafren, I doubt that you are in any position to levy accusations against a news organization. Well, Julianus, that's where you're wrong. And if you re-read my words, I think you'll find I accused the paper of 'poor journalism'. This is a claim that can be substantiated. It is poor journalistic practice to publish a news story without interviewing all the particulars involved. Originally by: Julianus Soter Your little plan got defeated. Please don't be a bad sport and moan about it on the IGS by accusing the ANN of calumny: an accusation, if made, requires actual evidence of it having occured. What little plan? You seem to be living in some sort of paranoid fantasy. Let me make it quite clear. There is no conspiracy. There is no evil master-plan. Nothing in my words constituted moaning. I am being entirely rational. I resent being drawn into yours and Ben's power struggle. I resent you turning what could have been a reasonable debate into a circus. You seem intent on making me your enemy when I've long been a supporter of yours. I don't think I'll ever fully understand you, Julianus. I've never met anyone so intent on alienating every other person he knows.
Kazzzi Amarr Heathen Legion Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2011.01.21 08:23:00 - [19] So wait, is I-RED gonna try to stop me from getting my fix?
Alexis Du'Volle	Posted - 2011.01.21 10:03:00 - [20] Originally by: Kazzzi So wait, is I-RED gonna try to stop me from getting my fix? On the contrary, it seems they're determined to be the ones giving it to you.
Sparkahn Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 11:03:00 - [21] It is a shame I have to repeat myself, but I feel it is the only way to get through to certain individuals. 1. Originally by: Mammal Tafren However, it appears that there is little that association with the Serpentis Corporation will not sully. Even a news organisation with such promise. Originally by: Sparkahn It is important to note that ANN is a subsidiary of AI, not a branch of AI. Therefore, opinions and attitudes included in articles are not necessary the direct views of Anshar Incorporated, its employees, or any entity affiliated with the corporation. 2. Originally by: Mammal Tafren This article, plus another that I have seen elsewhere, are poor journalism. After these, I may have to switch to Gutter Press. At least they don't pretend to be any more than they are. Originally by: Sparkahn Those complaining about "one sided" [vis-a-vis biased] reports are reminded that in a laissez-faire media industry such as our own, there are no regulations regarding who is to be portrayed in what manner...It all depends on your point of view; after all, a good media company gives the people what they want, and does not strive to please every organisation it writes about. If I understand correctly, you have been satisfied with 52 out of a current 54 ANN articles. We are pleased that you have found so much of our content interesting, and are saddened that you have not been satisfied with 4% of reports. It may be in your interests to avoid articles where you or those affiliated with you are under scrutiny. Perhaps in future there will be a report detailing, in ANN's trademark controversial manner, the dirty dealings of one of your rivals; I'm sure such an article would receive your utmost support. In addition, there appears to be some confusing about the authenticity of information in the report originally in question. Originally by: Xenos Giger It is even more surprising that these accusations of a "Backfire" of operational status come to sight without any actual factual evidence. There is still a high quantity of boosters for sale in Intaki under the Trade Goods section of the market - I clarified this myself. This would suggest that the I-RED efforts to stall booster distribution have not been as successful as fires implied; would you not agree? The rest of the article goes on to detail selected verbal accounts of people who voluntarily came forward after an appeal for opinion regarding the increase in booster availability in Intaki. ANN trusts its reader-base and contributors to provide genuine information, and if any is thought to be purely fabricated it is not published. Thank you all for your continued support for debate generated by Arcadia News Network.
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.21 12:36:00 - [22] Originally by: Sparkahn There is still a high quantity of boosters for sale in Intaki under the Trade Goods section of the market - I clarified this myself. This would suggest that the I-RED efforts to stall booster distribution have not been as successful as first implied; would you not agree? The rest of the article goes on to detail selected verbal accounts of people who voluntarily came forward after an appeal for opinion regarding the increase in booster availability in Intaki. ANN trusts its reader-base and contributors to provide genuine information, and if any is thought to be purely fabricated it is not published. Thank you all for your continued support for debate generated by Arcadia News Network. The verbal accounts are not even capsuleers, where Ishukone-Raata Booster operations are only targeting the capsuleer market. I doubt the people you're "journalist" spoke to could even afford to pay for one of the boosters for sale on the Intaki market unless the general populace became millionaires over the past few days, not to mention it would in most cases kill them. As for our efforts to stall distribution is still in progress, and we continue to do so with great success, competition is not a backfire. We have already taken appropriate measures to deal with the person's in charge of making the sales. The article is flawed and a pure attack on Ishukone-Raata's reputation, which is obvious with the lack of evidence and knowledge on the matter.
Senn Typhos Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:06:00 - [23] If your only target market is the capsuleers, why do you care about the Serpentis? Their market is primarily in the civilian population of Intaki. It is also painfully obvious that neither you, nor your constituents understand the civilian market. I once again suggest you seriously consider whether or not your alliance are suited to such interdictions. If you want to do some real good for Intaki, then pack up and leave it to the professionals. That goes for anyone with thoughts of making Intaki a "trading hub."
Sparkahn Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:14:00 - [24] Although it pains me greatly to continue this discussion, I feel I must protest. Mr. Revenent, the term "pulling at straws" comes to mind. Originally by: John Revenent Ishukone-Raata Booster operations are only targeting the capsuleer market. Your original press release gives no specificity regarding which market you were targetting. This being the case, ANN journalists naturally assumed that a corporation with such a high moral standard as I-RED would focus on all booster markets, not only the most lucrative. Originally by: John Revenent I doubt the people you're "journalist" spoke to could even afford to pay for one of the boosters for sale on the Intaki market unless the general populace became millionaires over the past few days, not to mention it would in most cases kill them. This is an obvious display of your naivety with regards to how Serpentis supplied narcotics are cut and distrbuted to the general population. Ultimately, if you were to take anything from this article, surely it would be that, according to worrying accounts of Intaki colonists, the problem of boosters lies not in the capsuleer market, but in the non-capsuleer market. Perhaps I-RED should change its stance to try and rid Intaki and the surrounding area of all narcotics, if it is genuinely concerned about the effect of Serpentis operations on the region. Unless, of course, I-RED seek to profit only from the capsuleer market, and wish to elimiate the competition, as suggested.
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:26:00 - [25] Originally by: Senn Typhos If your only target market is the capsuleers, why do you care about the Serpentis? Their market is primarily in the civilian population of Intaki. It is also painfully obvious that neither you, nor your constituents understand the civilian market. I once again suggest you seriously consider whether or not your alliance are suited to such interdictions. If you want to do some real good for Intaki, then pack up and leave it to the professionals. That goes for anyone with thoughts of making Intaki a "trading hub." I would suggest you read our original release again, as it was clearly stated that: Originally by: John Revenent Originally by: Myyona Let me state; there is a world of difference between the performance enhancing drugs for capsuleers and the common narcotic products. Of course, a lot of the basic chemical compounds are the same but the targeted consumer is completely different. Long term physical drawback effects are of less concern for a user with cloning access than for the common population. The special environment the control pod provides allows for full control of dosage and with neural training some, if not all, side effects can be prevented. For the very same reasons should these performance enhancing drug types never be given to a non-capsuleer. Especially the stronger drug types, based on cytoserocin gas components, can kill a normal person instantly. This is the very same reason why these types of products are labeled as contraband while the milder versions, based on mykoserocin gas components, are not. I applaud the intentions of I-RED, but, with what I just wrote, the major market for the Serpentis is not capsuleers but narcotics for the common population. While possible, I hope not that I-RED plans to fight the narcotic problem by making true narcotics themselves. The best way to battle the dealings of the Serpentis still seems to be to eradicate their operations whenever encountered, through force if necessary, and support drug rehabilitation programs. You make several good points Myyona, I will answer them to the best of my ability. The market may not be capsuleer based when it comes to a organization such as the Serpentis, but as you have stated the materials used are generally the same. Ishukone-Raata in our efforts obtain the materials in almost the same way as others including the Serpentis Corporation. Be it through acquisition on the market or mining techniques in open dead-space. With this in mind, and when it comes to our Enforcers who I will add are almost untouchable when operating in the same area of operation as the Serpentis and independent sources, it does harm these production/mining operations when it comes to simple economics. Again more research would have simply pointed this out, and again it shows the direct attack on Ishukone-Raata's reputation be it through the journalists inability to look at a matter before going to planet based civilians for information on capsuleer matters.. or it is simply a very poor attempt to take a stab.
Sparkahn Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:44:00 - [26] I fail to see how this proves your point. It is, for a start, a reply to a post questioning your first post, and not something clearly outlined in your original release. Originally by: John Revenent The market may not be capsuleer based when it comes to a organization such as the Serpentis, but as you have stated the materials used are generally the same. Surely this implies you will be attempting to disrupt both markets, as both are, according to you, sourced in the same way. There is a distinct lack of clarity on your part. I would advise you to resolve these clarity issues before you start accusing my fellow journalists of poor research.
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:49:00 - [27] Originally by: Sparkahn Although it pains me greatly to continue this discussion, I feel I must protest. Mr. Revenent, the term "pulling at straws" comes to mind. Yes I agree the ANN journalism is pulling at straws to soil our name. Originally by: Sparkahn This is an obvious display of your naivety with regards to how Serpentis supplied narcotics are cut and distrbuted to the general population. Ultimately, if you were to take anything from this article, surely it would be that, according to worrying accounts of Intaki colonists, the problem of boosters lies not in the capsuleer market, but in the non-capsuleer market. Perhaps I-RED should change its stance to try and rid Intaki and the surrounding area of all narcotics, if it is genuinely concerned about the effect of Serpentis operations on the region. Unless, of course, I-RED seek to profit only from the capsuleer market, and wish to elimiate the competition, as suggested. Again if your journalist did its research, as subsidiary of the Ishukone Corporation we are unable to directly involve ourselves in the Intaki Assembly's and Planetary Governance. So why would you assume we would target civilians based on planets in Intaki.. We do what we can within our bounds. So I will state it in simple terms "again" we gather the resources needed to produce and distribute to reduce the capabilities of organizations such as the Serpentis in the area, not to mention the Serpentis Loyalist groups out their would be feeling the strain of such a control of the market as Ishukone-Raata has placed over Synth-Grade Boosters.
Sparkahn Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 13:58:00 - [28] Originally by: John Revenent So I will state it in simple terms "again" we gather the resources needed to produce and distribute to reduce the capabilities of organizations such as the Serpentis in the area, not to mention the Serpentis Loyalist groups out their would be feeling the strain of such a control of the market as Ishukone-Raata has placed over Synth-Grade Boosters. Why do this, other than for your own personal gain?
Milo Caman Gallente Anshar Incorporated	Posted - 2011.01.21 14:01:00 - [29] Originally by: John Revenent not to mention the Serpentis Loyalist groups out their would be feeling the strain of such a control of the market as Ishukone-Raata has placed over Synth-Grade Boosters. Well I certainly haven't been. ---
John Revenent Caldari Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive	Posted - 2011.01.21 14:08:00 - [30] Originally by: Sparkahn I fail to see how this proves your point. It is, for a start, a reply to a post questioning your first post, and not something clearly outlined in your original release. Don't make me laugh I know you are not that daft... It was a reply in the original open public forum. It has all the relevance to this issue. As for your clarity issues, that is a problem created by the ANN through constant disinformation not me. I have made myself and Ishukone-Raata's very complicated situation clear, it is your journalists that want to simplify the situation and point a finger without gathering the full story.. In business there is never just black and white, one and two. The ANN prides itself for its work, which is plucking something out of someones ass and talking to no-one that is relevant in the matter, slapping on a name to soil, and making a poor outline of a situation they are obviously clueless of.

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.