Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Arthur Frayn
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 09:24:00 -
[181]
Edited by: Arthur Frayn on 17/03/2011 09:26:24
Originally by: Nadea Semah For those that (arguments sake) were raised with strong ethical and moral backgrounds- based on religion, or what not..
I object to the notion that religion can be the source of any kind of ethical framework. -- Eventus stultorum magister. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 09:31:00 -
[182]
Originally by: Mighty Dread Right but you can't come to the rescue of another player who is not in your corp/alliance without being penalized and/or Concordokkened.
Sure you can. You can put reps on them; if the attack is illegal, you can kill/jam/scramble the attackers; it's entirely possible to scare people away just with an overbearing presence. You can do lots of things, but only after they have actually been attacked.
Originally by: Alpheias didn't find one with popcorn so you get one with strawberries instead!
Good. Strawberries > popcorn. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Minmatar Vahrokh Consulting
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 09:31:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Arthur Frayn Edited by: Arthur Frayn on 17/03/2011 09:26:24
Originally by: Nadea Semah For those that (arguments sake) were raised with strong ethical and moral backgrounds- based on religion, or what not..
I object to the notion that religion can be the source of any kind of ethical framework.
The whole western civilization had heavy influences from religion, and other "big blocks" (middle east and far east) had their own religions drawing the very base values used in those societies. Of course there were people that would oppose them or try subvert them both from the outside and from the inside and a whole lot of rotten apples, but the bases are there.
Auditing | Research | 3rd Party | Collateral Holding | EvE RL Charity |

Lemmy Kravitz
Minmatar THE FINAL 5TAND
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 09:31:00 -
[184]
Edited by: Lemmy Kravitz on 17/03/2011 09:32:35 meh.. eve and life have no morals. The only difference between eve and life is that there are real consequences in real life, while the consequences in eve are fictional. Personally I believe what we see in eve is far closer to what people really are inside.
**** that douches it up in EVE usually = douche in RL. The only thing that determines how much of douche he is is how much power and influence that person has, and how afraid they are of the consequences.
A decent person in eve usually = decent person in RL.
Life is a game with real consequences ------------------------------------------------- "Vae Victis" -Brennus |

Maikeruko
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 13:57:00 -
[185]
Of course. First though, I'd like to point out that idea of morality is artificial. There is no such thing as morality. Humans are just arrogant enough to believe we know what's "right."
However, my moral compass from real life indeed passes into EVE. I have never and will never engage in PVP. I refuse to deprive another person of an item which, although virtual, cost a living being hours of their life and could possibly emotionally harm them by its loss. This is a game, but it's a damn important one to a lot of people. If you take actions that could upset people and you don't care, you're a jerk.
Eve is an incredibly cutthroat game. I'm making my home solar system slightly more livable by not being a total asshat.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:00:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: EglantinFinfleur
Common sense dictates that anybody with a hint of good will towards his fellow man won't engage in gratuitous ganking or scamming, given the fact that losing ships or isk equals quite a lot of time lost.
Common Sense? In my experience that's short-hand for "unexamined assuption".
I'll repeat my earlier question: why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
In other words, why do you think people can't engage in "moral roleplaying"?
Is it a coincidence that the jerks out to harass choose to be grief players in Eve? I think not. They choose to be so because the game allows them to use it as a tool to bring real life discomfort to others.
To say that good people choose to "role-play" to be an ******* is laughable. There's no such thing as role-playing a jerk. Hell, take these forums as an example. Usually, the hostile loud-mouthed players against anyone that chooses to play differently from them (ie play a carebear) are grief players. Those usually ridiculing and showing e-peens are grief players.
So to answer your question on why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
Because their lack of ethics roles over and shows even when posting on the forums, where usually there is no role-playing. The way they carry themselves. And you can defend them and pretend that they're pastors and good samaritans in real life. But I'm betting on that they're either lying or restraining themselves due to real life consequences to their actions.
And your comeback a few posts ago that in cricket it's allowed to taunt and grief, I wasn't talking about whether it is allowed and legal on certain games or not. You see, that's not what this is about. It's about questioning whether it is ethically acceptable to do so. In my opinion, no, it isn't. I don't care that in cricket it is ok to spit on the players. To me, it's not what any sport should be about, unless it's a spitting competition, I guess :\.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

Malcanis
Caldari Alcohlics Anonymous Scum Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:27:00 -
[187]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Is it a coincidence that the jerks out to harass choose to be grief players in Eve? I think not. They choose to be so because the game allows them to use it as a tool to bring real life discomfort to others.
To say that good people choose to "role-play" to be an ******* is laughable. There's no such thing as role-playing a jerk. Hell, take these forums as an example. Usually, the hostile loud-mouthed players against anyone that chooses to play differently from them (ie play a carebear) are grief players. Those usually ridiculing and showing e-peens are grief players.
So to answer your question on why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
Because their lack of ethics roles over and shows even when posting on the forums, where usually there is no role-playing. The way they carry themselves. And you can defend them and pretend that they're pastors and good samaritans in real life. But I'm betting on that they're either lying or restraining themselves due to real life consequences to their actions.
And your comeback a few posts ago that in cricket it's allowed to taunt and grief, I wasn't talking about whether it is allowed and legal on certain games or not. You see, that's not what this is about. It's about questioning whether it is ethically acceptable to do so. In my opinion, no, it isn't. I don't care that in cricket it is ok to spit on the players. To me, it's not what any sport should be about, unless it's a spitting competition, I guess :\.
It's trivially obvious that if a person is a total jerk in RL, then he will also be very likely be one in EVE. I don't think anyone is disputing that. But you're conflating that with the original question of whether a person can be "Evil" in game and a nice person in RL, and that's much less obvious.
The evidence you supply - that a few dozen of the people you (assume) to be "evil" in game also make terribad posts isn't very convincing at all. In fact it's pretty much irrelevent. Are you seriously proposing that there's "no roleplaying" in forum posts? Really? None? And even if it did prove that *they* are "evil", what does that say about the large majority who come nowhere near the forums?
The reason I cited the cricket example is to demonstrate that there is a pragmatic "non evil" motivation for that kind of talk. Arguably it's not very nice to use provoking language in order to entice someone into making a mistake, but calling it evidence of "evil" is a bit of a stretch, to put it mildly.
In short it is more plausible for a moral preson to pretend to be morally deficient than it is for a morally deficient person to pretend to be moral. To use an analogy, it's a hell of a lot easier to fake having a limp than to fake not having one.
Ofc even a sociopath can pretend to be a good guy - for a while. Especially in a low-bandwidth social situation like EVE. But a genuinely cruel, selfish, hateful will show their nature soon enough. I have met very few people like this in EVE, and they're widely despised even amongst the people you like to call "griefers". 99% of the people that people like you call "griefers" aren't evil or morally deficient, they're just playing an intensely competitive PvP game and they dont happen to be on your side.
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

Malcanis
Caldari Alcohlics Anonymous Scum Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:31:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Maikeruko Of course. First though, I'd like to point out that idea of morality is artificial. There is no such thing as morality. Humans are just arrogant enough to believe we know what's "right."
However, my moral compass from real life indeed passes into EVE. I have never and will never engage in PVP. I refuse to deprive another person of an item which, although virtual, cost a living being hours of their life and could possibly emotionally harm them by its loss. This is a game, but it's a damn important one to a lot of people. If you take actions that could upset people and you don't care, you're a jerk.
Eve is an incredibly cutthroat game. I'm making my home solar system slightly more livable by not being a total asshat.
What would you say to an American Football player who refused to tackle an opposing player because he was opposed to violence in pursuit of selfish aims?
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

Romo Skywind
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:36:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Maikeruko Of course. First though, I'd like to point out that idea of morality is artificial. There is no such thing as morality. Humans are just arrogant enough to believe we know what's "right."
However, my moral compass from real life indeed passes into EVE. I have never and will never engage in PVP. I refuse to deprive another person of an item which, although virtual, cost a living being hours of their life and could possibly emotionally harm them by its loss. This is a game, but it's a damn important one to a lot of people. If you take actions that could upset people and you don't care, you're a jerk.
Eve is an incredibly cutthroat game. I'm making my home solar system slightly more livable by not being a total asshat.
What would you say to an American Football player who refused to tackle an opposing player because he was opposed to violence in pursuit of selfish aims?
There's nothing wrong with flag football 
|

Baaldor
Igneus Auctorita Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:37:00 -
[190]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: EglantinFinfleur
Common sense dictates that anybody with a hint of good will towards his fellow man won't engage in gratuitous ganking or scamming, given the fact that losing ships or isk equals quite a lot of time lost.
Common Sense? In my experience that's short-hand for "unexamined assuption".
I'll repeat my earlier question: why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
In other words, why do you think people can't engage in "moral roleplaying"?
Is it a coincidence that the jerks out to harass choose to be grief players in Eve? I think not. They choose to be so because the game allows them to use it as a tool to bring real life discomfort to others.
To say that good people choose to "role-play" to be an ******* is laughable. There's no such thing as role-playing a jerk. Hell, take these forums as an example. Usually, the hostile loud-mouthed players against anyone that chooses to play differently from them (ie play a carebear) are grief players. Those usually ridiculing and showing e-peens are grief players.
So to answer your question on why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
Because their lack of ethics roles over and shows even when posting on the forums, where usually there is no role-playing. The way they carry themselves. And you can defend them and pretend that they're pastors and good samaritans in real life. But I'm betting on that they're either lying or restraining themselves due to real life consequences to their actions.
And your comeback a few posts ago that in cricket it's allowed to taunt and grief, I wasn't talking about whether it is allowed and legal on certain games or not. You see, that's not what this is about. It's about questioning whether it is ethically acceptable to do so. In my opinion, no, it isn't. I don't care that in cricket it is ok to spit on the players. To me, it's not what any sport should be about, unless it's a spitting competition, I guess :\.
You wouldn't think someone with such supposed high moral fiber be associated with a bunch of immoral ****wits, especially playing a game that supports and promotes this kind of behavior.
Unless of course you are an attention ***** trying to be that special snow flake.
|
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:49:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Baaldor You wouldn't think someone with such supposed high moral fiber be associated with a bunch of immoral ****wits, especially playing a game that supports and promotes this kind of behavior.
Unless of course you are an attention ***** trying to be that special snow flake.
You prove my point rather well, Baaldor.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

Baaldor
Igneus Auctorita Gentlemen's Agreement
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 14:52:00 -
[192]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Baaldor You wouldn't think someone with such supposed high moral fiber be associated with a bunch of immoral ****wits, especially playing a game that supports and promotes this kind of behavior.
Unless of course you are an attention ***** trying to be that special snow flake.
You prove my point rather well, Baaldor.
That you are a special snow flake soap box stomping attention *****?
Your are very welcome.
|

Malcanis
Caldari Alcohlics Anonymous Scum Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 15:10:00 -
[193]
Originally by: Romo Skywind
Originally by: Malcanis
Originally by: Maikeruko Of course. First though, I'd like to point out that idea of morality is artificial. There is no such thing as morality. Humans are just arrogant enough to believe we know what's "right."
However, my moral compass from real life indeed passes into EVE. I have never and will never engage in PVP. I refuse to deprive another person of an item which, although virtual, cost a living being hours of their life and could possibly emotionally harm them by its loss. This is a game, but it's a damn important one to a lot of people. If you take actions that could upset people and you don't care, you're a jerk.
Eve is an incredibly cutthroat game. I'm making my home solar system slightly more livable by not being a total asshat.
What would you say to an American Football player who refused to tackle an opposing player because he was opposed to violence in pursuit of selfish aims?
There's nothing wrong with flag football 
Indeed there isn't, but let's assume that the player in question has chosen to join a team in a league that explicitly doesn't play flag football.
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

DeliciousHamBeast
Caldari Ignoble Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 15:16:00 -
[194]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Is it a coincidence that the jerks out to harass choose to be grief players in Eve? I think not. They choose to be so because the game allows them to use it as a tool to bring real life discomfort to others.
To say that good people choose to "role-play" to be an ******* is laughable. There's no such thing as role-playing a jerk. Hell, take these forums as an example. Usually, the hostile loud-mouthed players against anyone that chooses to play differently from them (ie play a carebear) are grief players. Those usually ridiculing and showing e-peens are grief players.
So to answer your question on why is it harder to belive that a normally good person can pretend to be an ebil piwate than it is to believe that they can pretend to be an immortal, god-like starship captain?
Because their lack of ethics roles over and shows even when posting on the forums, where usually there is no role-playing. The way they carry themselves. And you can defend them and pretend that they're pastors and good samaritans in real life. But I'm betting on that they're either lying or restraining themselves due to real life consequences to their actions.
And your comeback a few posts ago that in cricket it's allowed to taunt and grief, I wasn't talking about whether it is allowed and legal on certain games or not. You see, that's not what this is about. It's about questioning whether it is ethically acceptable to do so. In my opinion, no, it isn't. I don't care that in cricket it is ok to spit on the players. To me, it's not what any sport should be about, unless it's a spitting competition, I guess :\.
It's entirely possible to roll-play as some sort of horrible jerk - some people do it all the time. There are people who play games simply to grief or harass other player (they can be found in every multiplayer game and every forum), but not everyone who pirates/pvps/market pvps/scams are here to do that. I could try to draw parallels with chess or competitive sports or even monopoly, but that hasn't worked so far so I'll try this: Eve is a PVP game, if you're flying around in space carrying shinies and I blow you up and take them - well I'm gaining something in a competitive game. If you're missioning and selling your loot on the market and I'm 0.001-isking you to death I'm still working to better my position in a competition. Saying that by doing this I secretly have no personal ethics and am not a "good person" is, in your own words "laughable".
Speaking of "good" people... How do you decide whether or not a person is a good person? Is it how nice and polite they are to other people, or how much money they donate to charity, what? Arbitrary labels like "good person" don't really lend strength to an argument, considering it's pretty darn subjective.
</ barely coherent ramble>
Coffee time!
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 15:38:00 -
[195]
Basically, this whole thread boils down to this:
Which is true?- Evil => Griefer
- Evil <=> Griefer
- Neither.
(No-one seems to be suggesting the interesting alternative Griefer => Evil.)
Get voting, peopleà  ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 15:39:00 -
[196]
Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 17/03/2011 15:43:28
Originally by: DeliciousHamBeast It's entirely possible to roll-play as some sort of horrible jerk - some people do it all the time. There are people who play games simply to grief or harass other player (they can be found in every multiplayer game and every forum), but not everyone who pirates/pvps/market pvps/scams are here to do that. I could try to draw parallels with chess or competitive sports or even monopoly, but that hasn't worked so far so I'll try this: Eve is a PVP game, if you're flying around in space carrying shinies and I blow you up and take them - well I'm gaining something in a competitive game. If you're missioning and selling your loot on the market and I'm 0.001-isking you to death I'm still working to better my position in a competition. Saying that by doing this I secretly have no personal ethics and am not a "good person" is, in your own words "laughable".
I somewhat agree with you on this. But I am not, by any means, suggesting that all pirates are bad people. PVP is indeed an integral part of this game.
What I am proposing is that grief (and mean-spirited) play is not only not necessary but it's brought forth by disfunctional players to begin with. I'm also saying that these players tend to accomodate themselves quite well as pirates in this game, because the game facilitates their behavior. And I'm also proposing that you cannot role-play a jerk or bully. You either are or you aren't. When your intentions are to insult or ridicule someone you are no longer doing this in-game. You are trying to emotionally hurt someone in real life. You can no longer chug it up to "it's just a game" because you yourself are no longer treating it as such.
I know there are good people (however many) out there that play pirates. But these aren't the people I'm talking about. I'm talking about the many mean-spirited players that are out to intenionally ruin other people's game experience. You see it on these forums every day (visit C&P). People that play specifically to rile other players and get them to lash out ("collect tears"). Perhaps because they're loud and obnoxious it tends to seem worse than it really is.
Quote: Speaking of "good" people... How do you decide whether or not a person is a good person? Is it how nice and polite they are to other people, or how much money they donate to charity, what? Arbitrary labels like "good person" don't really lend strength to an argument, considering it's pretty darn subjective.
</ barely coherent ramble>
Coffee time!
Golden rule. Don't like grief? Don't do it.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

Ebisu Kami
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 15:49:00 -
[197]
Edited by: Ebisu Kami on 17/03/2011 15:54:35
Originally by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Originally by: Arthur Frayn Edited by: Arthur Frayn on 17/03/2011 09:26:24
Originally by: Nadea Semah For those that (arguments sake) were raised with strong ethical and moral backgrounds- based on religion, or what not..
I object to the notion that religion can be the source of any kind of ethical framework.
The whole western civilization had heavy influences from religion, and other "big blocks" (middle east and far east) had their own religions drawing the very base values used in those societies. Of course there were people that would oppose them or try subvert them both from the outside and from the inside and a whole lot of rotten apples, but the bases are there.
You're drawing an incomplete picture there. Humanism had a huge impact on western morals and society and one of the center-points of humanism is, that religion is not supposed to have a governing place in ethics and morals of said society, but reason and thought.
Having said that: If you need a supernatural beeing (or several thereof) to give you laws and rules on how to treat your surroundings in sensible ways, then you're doing it wrong.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 16:08:00 -
[198]
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian Edited by: Eternum Praetorian on 16/03/2011 20:49:31 EVE Can Be Viewed As A Study Of The Human Condition
How many things do you not do simply because you fear it's consequence?
If there are no cops on the road would you speed? Answer: Yes.
If you could not be arrested for shoplifting at your favorite electronics store would you take that big screen HD TV you have been wanting? Answer: Yes.
If a truly beautiful woman (I mean stunningly beutiful ) showed genuine interest in your tubby, overweight aging body would you cheat if no one would ever know? Answer: Yes.
If that same woman proclaimed her undying love for you (and she was wealthy) would you leave your current marriage, kids and family to move overseas and be with her? (Really think about it) Answer: Yes.
I can keep going and going with this (for like pages ) bringing into question everything that you base your entire moral reality on in Real Life. Eve is unique in that it allows for the individual (you) to exist in a world totally free of all moral consequence. "Because after all "It is just a game"
Here in EVE you are presented with choices every day that may only come once or twice in your life outside of EVE. Choices like "Should I steal this because it will benefit me greatly?" or "Should I pester this person until I get my desired emotional response?" all the while you KNOW that whatever you do will not effect you in any way shape or form. Because it is ONLY a game. Right? 
. . .
Here, in this digital RL simulator you can get a glimpse of yourself (and the choices you are capable of making) in an arena that absolves you of all consequence, repercussions and yes, even your God. Your God doesn't care what you do in EVE now does it?
Yes this is just a game... But a human is at the keyboard playing it, and in order for it to exist you must make a choice. That choice can only reflect the "You" free of the consequences of your actions. Because eve is far to complex to be a simple "First person shooter.
It is a unique environment that requires that you make choices in order to play.
When Leonardo Da vinci took it upon himself to paint people as they truly are on the inside This Is What He Depicted Eve is just an unexpected doorway to help bring mankind's purest, undiluted nature to the surface.
You're a real pice of **** IRL if you really mean that. .
|

Tza Omi
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 16:39:00 -
[199]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2 on 17/03/2011 16:24:48
Originally by: DeliciousHamBeast It's entirely possible to roll-play as some sort of horrible jerk - some people do it all the time. There are people who play games simply to grief or harass other player (they can be found in every multiplayer game and every forum), but not everyone who pirates/pvps/market pvps/scams are here to do that. I could try to draw parallels with chess or competitive sports or even monopoly, but that hasn't worked so far so I'll try this: Eve is a PVP game, if you're flying around in space carrying shinies and I blow you up and take them - well I'm gaining something in a competitive game. If you're missioning and selling your loot on the market and I'm 0.001-isking you to death I'm still working to better my position in a competition. Saying that by doing this I secretly have no personal ethics and am not a "good person" is, in your own words "laughable".
I somewhat agree with you on this. But I am not, by any means, suggesting that all pirates are bad people. PVP is indeed an integral part of this game.
What I am proposing is that grief (and mean-spirited) play is not only not necessary but it's brought forth by (RL) disfunctional people to begin with. I'm also saying that these players tend to accomodate themselves quite well as pirates in this game, because the game (and this type of play specifically) facilitates their behavior. And I'm also proposing that you cannot role-play a jerk or bully. You either are or you aren't. When your intentions are to insult or ridicule someone you are no longer doing this in-game. You are trying to emotionally hurt someone in real life. You can no longer chug it up to "it's just a game" because you yourself are no longer treating it as such.
I know there are good people (however many) out there that play pirates. But these aren't the people I'm talking about. I'm talking about the many mean-spirited players that are out to intenionally ruin other people's game experience. You see it on these forums every day (visit C&P). People that play specifically to rile other players and get them to lash out ("collect tears"). Perhaps because they're loud and obnoxious they tend to make it seem worse than it really is. I admit that it's a possibility.
Quote: Speaking of "good" people... How do you decide whether or not a person is a good person? Is it how nice and polite they are to other people, or how much money they donate to charity, what? Arbitrary labels like "good person" don't really lend strength to an argument, considering it's pretty darn subjective.
</ barely coherent ramble>
Coffee time!
Golden rule. Don't like grief? Don't do it.
Pretty much your bolded part, if I hurt someone and I know it it doesn't feel good, in fact it feels bad kind of cold and empty, if you can hurt someone and feel good about it then thats built into you, it sure isn't in me. You are just socially and genetically predisposed to douchebaggery.
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 16:57:00 -
[200]
I wouldn't go as far as saying PVPing in a PVP game is evil. In my opinion it narrows down to what your intentions are.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |
|

Eternum Praetorian
True Creation
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 20:19:00 -
[201]
Edited by: Eternum Praetorian on 17/03/2011 20:25:58
I think what your all trying to say is
1.) Eve is a game where you can do as you please
And most importantly...
2.) You feel that you are morally and ethically justified most of the time (Big Surprise Right?)
That pretty much sum things up, amiright?
@ Cypher Jones
Please elaborate on your concrete moral and ethical foundations, I would be curious to hear them? And no I am not trolling you, I try to pay close attention to other peoples varying perspectives whether I find them factual or not. I would like to know why my statement made me look like some kind of cat poo that got stuck to the bottom of your shoe? Do you truly not observe this kind of behavior in most of the Human Beings that surround you?
|

Eternum Praetorian
True Creation
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 20:38:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian
My Stuff
You're a real pice of **** IRL if you really mean that.
Why? This is an observable quality of (at the very least) a vast majority of the Human population? Why does stating this on a video game forum make me a real piece of RL ****?
|

Burial Day
Anti-citizen One
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 20:39:00 -
[203]
Originally by: Lex Dante
Originally by: Burial Day The issue is more complicated than bringing up extreme hypotheticals and calling the whole thing disproved.
What "extreme hypotheticals"? I simply stated that EVE is a giant state machine which we cause to transition through states. That's code. How is that "hypothetical"?
Originally by: Burial Day I suggest you look up what an appeal to authority is. [...V]ery easy to provide logical proof[...] The issue is more complicated[...] The amount of literature [...] is staggering.
Right, I'm the one who needs to brush up on his fallacies. Evidence, do you provide it? Or do you hide behind 'logic', 'literature' and 'obviousness'? Then I guess you know exactly how fallacious your argument is.
Originally by: Burial Day Injury (and hence morality) involves much more than mere killing. I'm sure you agree how small-minded your claim is.
Okay, so if I scam someone I'm changing a different property of the state machine that is EVE. Why is that somehow "much more" than "merely" changing a property that indicates the life status of a player?
Originally by: Burial Day I said it would be easy to turn real life into a game, not that anyone else had done it[...] The amount of literature on how society and culture are 100% constructs (i.e., human games) is staggering.
So which is it? Life is just like a game or it isn't?
And even if this is true and at a base level they share simulation aspects in common, why do one set of rules from one game necessarily carry over to another? Because God said so? Because you do?
Do you decry Noughts & Crosses as a disgusting allegory to overpopulation-driven race war? Of course you don't, because that's ridiculous. To state that anyone is acting "immorally", that their in-game behaviour is any indicator of their actual real world behaviour, is just as painfully juvenile and about as deep an examination of human morality as The Matrix was on the nature of reality, little more than a ****-smear.
Sometimes I feel like other people exist purely to troll me.
An extreme hypothetical would be something like, "a pacifist would be a hypocrite if they played Chess."
My "argument" isn't "fallacious" just because you think that every sentence a human being makes is automatically an argument. I said, "it would be easy to..." - that is not an argument. It is a proposition. Propositions can't be fallacious - they are only true or false.
Because the world isn't a "state machine." Organic life doesn't function on digital on-off switches. Everything is a continuum. If you'd like to argue that because murder MERELY involves changing a person from one state to another, go right ahead, you'll only be plunging further into reductionist idiocy.
Your question of "which is it" makes zero sense. Both the sentences you quote suggest that life is a game. And the whole point, which you're still missing, is that if both EVE and Life are essentially human games, then morality must be predicated on some other foundation. Perhaps the fact that they both involve people.
I've never said that in-game behavior reflects out of game BEHAVIOR. In conclusion, it appears you've argued with someone who said completely different things than I have. Fix your brain.
|

Bane Necran
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 21:09:00 -
[204]
Originally by: DeliciousHamBeast I've met plenty of good people who happen to also be pirates, several have even blown me up.
One of the nicest people i know in game is a very avid PvP'er.
I'm not making any kind of moral judgement, it's just not in me to do that. And i don't go mental on people who blow me up, or act all high and mighty. Different strokes for different folks.
Gallente and Minmatar .7 POS placement service. |

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 22:35:00 -
[205]
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian
My Stuff
You're a real pice of **** IRL if you really mean that.
Why? This is an observable quality of (at the very least) a vast majority of the Human population? Why does stating this on a video game forum make me a real piece of RL ****?
No, the vast majority of people do not act as you have suggested in the scenarios I quoted you on. .
|

Sisohiv
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 23:11:00 -
[206]
The game doesn't actually lack Morality and ethics. It lacks a point.
What do you do in EvE?
- Grind ISK - PvP
Why do you grind ISK? To PvP. Why do you PvP? To PvP.
The PvP is spreadsheet warfare. Resists and min maxing tuned to a fine art. All boiling down to who has the bigger blob of EHP and DPS.
People don't go ******* because it's our inate nature to be anal. They do it because they are bored out of thier ****ing skull. There is NO POINT to EvE. Blow each others "stuff" up so we can say we have more stuff than other people to win a game you can't win. |

DeliciousHamBeast
Caldari Ignoble Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 23:24:00 -
[207]
Originally by: Sisohiv The game doesn't actually lack Morality and ethics. It lacks a point. <more stuff of interest was here>
I thought the point to eve was to argue on the forums instead of doing work?
|

Eternum Praetorian
True Creation
|
Posted - 2011.03.17 23:59:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Originally by: Eternum Praetorian
My Stuff
You're a real pice of **** IRL if you really mean that.
Why? This is an observable quality of (at the very least) a vast majority of the Human population? Why does stating this on a video game forum make me a real piece of RL ****?
No, the vast majority of people do not act as you have suggested in the scenarios I quoted you on.
What a happy little world you live in...
|

Emperor Cheney
Celebrity Sex Tape
|
Posted - 2011.03.18 02:14:00 -
[209]
Edited by: Emperor Cheney on 18/03/2011 02:17:38
Ethics and Morality in Chutes and Ladders
Ethics and Morality in Monopoly
etc
edit to add some substance: Just as the above, to me, EVE is a game. Cheating is wrong, and making my little sister cry so I can win in SORRY! is gross and demeaning to all concerned. But other than that, it's a game.
People confusing EVE with RL is the root of most problems that stem from this game, whether it's playing too much, fundamentally bad sportsmanship, or just being really, really angry that someone named "Bad Bobby" didn't give you back your spacemoney after an "investment."
|

EpicFailTroll
|
Posted - 2011.03.18 03:15:00 -
[210]
Originally by: Emperor Cheney
Comment on EvE/RL supposed discrepancy, that has been addressed a dozen times in this thread.
Could you can your insightful comment some more, it's a bit too original for the cookie cutter tough EvE player lol internet spaceship cry more noob typical answer? People, not pixels, kid.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |