Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dar Saleem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 02:32:00 -
[181] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Hey Seleene ... why you give up on this thread?
They got their free trip to iceland, we wont hear from them again till just before the new CSM |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2010
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 13:12:00 -
[182] - Quote
Howdy all. Apologies for not checking the thread the past few weeks; I've been changing jobs and moving continents (back in Euro TZ now). I'll keep an eye on things here tho again starting.... now.
Dystopia Arkaral wrote:When the CSM started, did CCP actually ask you what you saw as the player/subscribers biggest X concerns about the game and if so what did you tell them
When the CSM actually started it was essentially a resurrected idea that was rushed into reality in response to the T20 scandal. It likely would have happened anyway, just not as soon. I don't really recall much serious back and forth in terms of the direction of the game before CSM 3. I was a dev for the first 5 iterations of the CSM and it was a highly regarded concept by some CCPers and an online terrorist organization to others. CSM 5, 6 and 7 have all worked to try and improve the relationships and processes so that it's worth everyone's time to be involved.
Flamespar wrote:One more request .. probably my last (no promises though ) This thread has been going on for quite a while and was started at Team Avatars suggestion Captains quarters ideas fixes and enhancementsIt would be great if you could poke Team Avatar and ask them to respond to that thread, maybe get them to indicate if any of the suggestions are possible. Cheers
This is something I've poked the hornet's nest about a few times now and the best I can tell you is that you probably shouldn't hold your breath expecting much in the way of ~Incarna~ advancement in the near future. Unless CCP pulls something out of their ass at FanFest that the CSM is unaware of, I have heard nothing that would lead me to believe we are going to see much iteration on space dolls or their living quarters soon. I have mixed feelings about it because, on one hand, it seems like there is a lot of potential there. On the other, CCP is very laser focused on getting the 'spaceships' side of the game working as well as possible. Short of a full blown player rabble about how CCP needs to stop working on spaceships in the next 12-18 months, I'd be surprised if CCP does much with this stuff. But, as I said, maybe I'm wrong and there is just something they are not telling us. I doubt it tho.
Hrald wrote:With a nerf to moons coming soon, will there be any buff to nullsec alliance incomes, whether through anomaly buffs for corporate taxes or other alternatives? It doesn't seem like sov is worth having anymore, perhaps something you can relate to, being in PL.
Anything like what you are talking about will likely be part of a much larger overhaul of sov and null-sec. The sov system is an unfinished, boring, time vampire. The entirety of null sec needs a massive update / overhaul. This is something the CSM has been pushing for aggressively and you will hear quite a lot more about leading up to the December summit CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
637
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 13:58:00 -
[183] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? ?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2010
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:16:00 -
[184] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? ?
Yep, I was waiting on an updated response to this. Basically, the QEN was a huge amount of work for the Research and Statistics group and it was decided that their time could be better spent on other projects. I'm pretty sure this was also announced at FanFest but my memory has faded over time. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Lord Zim
1947
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 14:32:00 -
[185] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Anything like what you are talking about will likely be part of a much larger overhaul of sov and null-sec. The sov system is an unfinished, boring, time vampire. The entirety of null sec needs a massive update / overhaul. This is something the CSM has been pushing for aggressively and you will hear quite a lot more about leading up to the December summit Can we get some sort of statement from CCP saying that they are going to look at it and to try to do things such as try to make the act of taking sov less of a hit/miss affair, and to try to incentivize actually living in nullsec as opposed to PVP in nullsec in fleet fights and do moneymaking stuff in hisec?
A yes/no would suffice. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5096
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:25:00 -
[186] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? ? Yep, I was waiting on an updated response to this. Basically, the QEN was a huge amount of work for the Research and Statistics group and it was decided that their time could be better spent on other projects. I'm pretty sure this was also announced at FanFest but my memory has faded over time.
Could they just make a monthly economic data dump of selected statistics for the stat-junkies to pore over? I'm sure that the playerbase would be delighted to do the actual report for them if they did. Indeed, I can imagine it being as popular a service as Dotlan or Eveboard. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2010
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:38:00 -
[187] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Seleene wrote:Anything like what you are talking about will likely be part of a much larger overhaul of sov and null-sec. The sov system is an unfinished, boring, time vampire. The entirety of null sec needs a massive update / overhaul. This is something the CSM has been pushing for aggressively and you will hear quite a lot more about leading up to the December summit Can we get some sort of statement from CCP saying that they are going to look at it and to try to do things such as try to make the act of taking sov less of a hit/miss affair, and to try to incentivize actually living in nullsec as opposed to PVP in nullsec in fleet fights and do moneymaking stuff in hisec? A yes/no would suffice.
Before the release of Retribution? No.
After the December summit? Yes. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2010
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 15:43:00 -
[188] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Seleene wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? ? Yep, I was waiting on an updated response to this. Basically, the QEN was a huge amount of work for the Research and Statistics group and it was decided that their time could be better spent on other projects. I'm pretty sure this was also announced at FanFest but my memory has faded over time. Could they just make a monthly economic data dump of selected statistics for the stat-junkies to pore over? I'm sure that the playerbase would be delighted to do the actual report for them if they did. Indeed, I can imagine it being as popular a service as Dotlan or Eveboard.
There is a bit of white noise that we are trying to cut through with regard to this very thing. Those old reports were put together from a LOT of raw data and obviously gone through with a fine toothed comb before release. There has been some discussion about how much of that data will be made available through CREST and this pretty much ties right into that. I wouldn't expect a solid answer until near the end of the year, but in the absence of CCP Diagoras' random stat updates (among other things), I think that CCP should certainly make some of the info 'public record' on a regular basis if they don't plan to release a formal report anymore. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Lord Zim
1947
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 19:30:00 -
[189] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Before the release of Retribution? No.
After the December summit? Yes. Good. Let's hope they'll make the right noises and follow that up with the right actions. They've got their work cut out for them, what with the last 3 years of neglect. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
637
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 01:23:00 -
[190] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? ? Yep, I was waiting on an updated response to this. Basically, the QEN was a huge amount of work for the Research and Statistics group and it was decided that their time could be better spent on other projects. I'm pretty sure this was also announced at FanFest but my memory has faded over time. Not to be pedantic, but was the "yep" on giving up on WH stabilizers?
And TY for the response, didn't realize you were IRL busier than normal!
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
|
Salpun
Paramount Commerce
417
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 01:30:00 -
[191] - Quote
Could you please find out what has happened to the compare tool neocom button. A dev sayed months ago that the art asset for the button was ready but it has still not shown up in game.
Glad to see you posting again. Hans monthy update of CSM activities is a little late |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
844
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 10:57:00 -
[192] - Quote
Could you do us a BIG favor and tell us when CCP is changing over the skills for the racial BCs and destroyers?
They have been severely lacking in a date, and just teasing us.
:) I'm not shitposting. |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
641
|
Posted - 2012.11.15 14:41:00 -
[193] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Could you do us a BIG favor and tell us when CCP is changing over the skills for the racial BCs and destroyers?
They have been severely lacking in a date, and just teasing us.
:) I thought that was supposed to come out spring of 2013?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
847
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 01:43:00 -
[194] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:rodyas wrote:Could you do us a BIG favor and tell us when CCP is changing over the skills for the racial BCs and destroyers?
They have been severely lacking in a date, and just teasing us.
:) I thought that was supposed to come out spring of 2013?
Yeah just trying to ask very taboo questions. Was hoping for a more exact response. Its just CCP Fozzy or someone recommending to train them now, that got me going, very inconvenient for me, but later on I don't mind training them up.
Also what are some passwords for entering Jove space. (By passwords I mean two passwords, and by two I mean account names and passwords?) I'm not shitposting. |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
849
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 05:18:00 -
[195] - Quote
Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament? I'm not shitposting. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2026
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 16:38:00 -
[196] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament?
Is it okay to say that I don't really care?
Quite honestly, I have nothing but respect for the CCP folks that work a lot of extra hours to put this stuff on for us, but the 'Open' is really the furthermost thing from my mind as EVE is concerned atm. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
658
|
Posted - 2012.11.24 12:23:00 -
[197] - Quote
Seleene wrote:rodyas wrote:Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament? Is it okay to say that I don't really care? Quite honestly, I have nothing but respect for the CCP folks that work a lot of extra hours to put this stuff on for us, but the 'Open' is really the furthermost thing from my mind as EVE is concerned atm. Ahem........
WH Stabilizers?
Still "seleene" approved?
C/D?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
867
|
Posted - 2012.11.27 09:53:00 -
[198] - Quote
Seleene wrote:rodyas wrote:Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament? Is it okay to say that I don't really care? Quite honestly, I have nothing but respect for the CCP folks that work a lot of extra hours to put this stuff on for us, but the 'Open' is really the furthermost thing from my mind as EVE is concerned atm.
Is it because of CCP Dolan? I suppose he was a competitor for CSM last time, so it might be a bit personal when you go back to iceland this winter. I'm not shitposting. |
Amelia Valkiery
University of Caille Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 12:51:00 -
[199] - Quote
I would like to know if the CSM/CCP have seen this thread in GD about why people do not engage in "PvP". There are a lot of points repeated by players. IMHO if I were to make a TL;DR of it:
- Cheesy, unspectacular, lopsided, illogical, unbelievable PvP game mechanics.
Looking at the starmap (average players in space, ships killed and similar) will tel you that low security space and "epic" null security fights/occupation is 95% make-believe available only to the few that blob up. The majority of players passes this content and is in high security space doing their stuff, either being wardecced playing mainly station games and timer management or PvE/trading/mining etc...
Is this on the radar and will there be a substantial improvement or is all hope in vain and Eve "PvP" stays the way it is?
Sidequestion, what design philosophy is there behind the Eve UI, the only product I see is the typical solution of an IT centered guy. Blob MOAR information/windows/tabs on the screen then any human can process. In other words a mess. Instead of making use of the nice filters and neural networks that I have in the back of my head. Physically I mean, in real life.
With all due respect, the retribution UI changes are 99% cosmetical that do not change anything in regards to give the player worthwile information instead of noise. Except the "tracking camera option" which is a good thing. But that should have been there in 2003.
There is more stuff, such as having some windows with their options in the top-left, some right click, others none, some others have their own.....but I'll leave it at this. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2088
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 14:36:00 -
[200] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Seleene wrote:rodyas wrote:Who will be the winner of the new Eden open tournament? Is it okay to say that I don't really care? Quite honestly, I have nothing but respect for the CCP folks that work a lot of extra hours to put this stuff on for us, but the 'Open' is really the furthermost thing from my mind as EVE is concerned atm. Is it because of CCP Dolan? I suppose he was a competitor for CSM last time, so it might be a bit personal when you go back to iceland this winter.
Eh? Personal? Why? CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
|
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
661
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 21:44:00 -
[201] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:WH Stabilizers?
Still "seleene" approved? C/D? Prior to your election, you said you had strong feelings about WH Stabilizers (or some other mechanic to get around mass limits and timers). You never elaborated on that, and you have avoided the question here in this thread.
Are you still in favor of some mechanic to change the behavior of WH's, and if so, is CCP working on it?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3412
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 10:53:00 -
[202] - Quote
I haven't heard any talk of wormhole stabilizers all year. Nobody inside the CSM has brought these up with CCP or is actively pushing for them at all. Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
2091
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 15:31:00 -
[203] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:WH Stabilizers?
Still "seleene" approved? C/D? Prior to your election, you said you had strong feelings about WH Stabilizers (or some other mechanic to get around mass limits and timers). You never elaborated on that, and you have avoided the question here in this thread. Are you still in favor of some mechanic to change the behavior of WH's, and if so, is CCP working on it?
Yeah, my strong feeling is that WH stabilizers are dumb. I have made a recurring joke about T3 Supertitans affecting wormholes but that's about it.
CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
661
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 00:35:00 -
[204] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:WH Stabilizers?
Still "seleene" approved? C/D? Prior to your election, you said you had strong feelings about WH Stabilizers (or some other mechanic to get around mass limits and timers). You never elaborated on that, and you have avoided the question here in this thread. Are you still in favor of some mechanic to change the behavior of WH's, and if so, is CCP working on it? Yeah, my strong feeling is that WH stabilizers are dumb. I have made a recurring joke about T3 Supertitans affecting wormholes but that's about it. TY - I knew the "titan" thing was not serious, but since you *had* been the dev (so far as I know) most closely associated with WH's (from before they were a thing) I seriously wanted to make sure that WHS were not a *thing*.
Again.
TY.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
669
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 20:57:00 -
[205] - Quote
Has CCP indicated if they believe the current mineral pricing ratios are something they are happy with? Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Cabal Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
466
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 00:14:00 -
[206] - Quote
Who on the CSM will press CCP to start providing hard economic data again aka specific facts like CCP Diagoras did before he quit CCP? |
Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 08:21:00 -
[207] - Quote
I +1 the hopes for ongoing statistics, not only economic but like the amazing Twitter feed by Diagoras.
Then, for next expansion, I'd really hope to see CSM working together with CCP to completely overhaul drone UI and fix drone AI and base mechanics and rebalance some of the stats. The NPC AI changes brought the old known issues into attention of larger audiences, affecting PVE now as well.
Although this is an AMA thread, here's a shortlist of most important required changes:
- new UI allowing full individual control of drones with custom hotkeys, with visual indication of which drones are targeted - new AI, with some simple customisable settings if possible (prioritize closest targets/of certain size/ewar etc) - the chase/orbit needs to be changed so that also MWDing drones shoot, and drones need to be much faster across the board - drone signature size is simply way too big, making them way too easy to kill
So, do you think we have hopes of seeing drones fixed in the next expansion?
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1000
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 08:24:00 -
[208] - Quote
Maelle LuzArdiden wrote:I +1 the hopes for ongoing statistics, not only economic but like the amazing Twitter feed by Diagoras.
Then, for next expansion, I'd really hope to see CSM working together with CCP to completely overhaul drone UI and fix drone AI and base mechanics and rebalance some of the stats. The NPC AI changes brought the old known issues into attention of larger audiences, affecting PVE now as well.
Although this is an AMA thread, here's a shortlist of most important required changes:
- new UI allowing full individual control of drones with custom hotkeys, with visual indication of which drones are targeted - new AI, with some simple customisable settings if possible (prioritize closest targets/of certain size/ewar etc) - the chase/orbit needs to be changed so that also MWDing drones shoot, and drones need to be much faster across the board - drone signature size is simply way too big, making them way too easy to kill
So, do you think we have hopes of seeing drones fixed in the next expansion?
Pos reworked and Corporation management and roles before all else.
Honestly they need to be fixed ASAP, they have waited too long and they are so broken. Yes drones need work but not as urgently as POS and corp management and roles. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 11:03:00 -
[209] - Quote
Oh, I fully agree with you but AFAIK those are already confirmed to be on the table. Could well also be different teams tackling the issues.
|
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1000
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 11:05:00 -
[210] - Quote
Maelle LuzArdiden wrote:Oh, I fully agree with you but AFAIK those are already confirmed to be on the table. Could well also be different teams tackling the issues.
Possibly but I will scream bloody murder if POS and corp management goes into the Soon basket. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |