Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Remigius Varagine
Federation Fleet The Unthinkables
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 21:52:00 -
[151] - Quote
Seleene wrote:1.) Do I think WHO is correct? Oh, sorry I wasn't clear enough :( I meant if mordfiddle and Jester are correct with the quoted statements. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1887
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 23:45:00 -
[152] - Quote
Remigius Varagine wrote:Seleene wrote:1.) Do I think WHO is correct? Oh, sorry I wasn't clear enough :( I meant if mordfiddle and Jester are correct with the quoted statements.
Nope, I don't think they are correct. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Flamespar
Woof Club
444
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 09:35:00 -
[153] - Quote
Thank you Selene for pushing for answers on Incarna. Many of us who have been waiting 5 years for CCP to deliver on its promise of Avatar gameplay are feeling largely abandoned by CCP. I'm really tired of arguing with trolls on the potential of Avatar gameplay in EVE.
the questions I would appreciate you passing on to CCP (or answering yourself if able) are: What happened to the Team Avatar blog regarding their prototyping? Will we be able to ent the interiors of our POSs as part of the revamp? Can we get expect anything (not clothing related) for Incara?
thanks I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4559
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 11:24:00 -
[154] - Quote
Was a resolution ever reached as to a vehcle for player suggestions? Is it still worthwhile posting in The Assembly Hall or what? Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1889
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 14:19:00 -
[155] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Thank you Selene for pushing for answers on Incarna. Many of us who have been waiting 5 years for CCP to deliver on its promise of Avatar gameplay are feeling largely abandoned by CCP. I'm really tired of arguing with trolls on the potential of Avatar gameplay in EVE.
the questions I would appreciate you passing on to CCP (or answering yourself if able) are: What happened to the Team Avatar blog regarding their prototyping?
I'm actually waiting on an answer to that right now. Some scheduling issues have prevented me linking up with the right person(s) but I'm trying to get more than just a one or two sentence email reply. I'd like for CCP to publicly state what is going on here or authorize the CSM to do so.
Flamespar wrote:Will we be able to ent the interiors of our POSs as part of the revamp?
Still way too early to know that sort of thing.
Flamespar wrote:Can we get expect anything (not clothing related) for Incara?
That's what I'm working to find out. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1889
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 14:25:00 -
[156] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Was a resolution ever reached as to a vehcle for player suggestions? Is it still worthwhile posting in The Assembly Hall or what?
TBH, not really. The Assembly Hall really needs to be closed and I doubt it will survive the year unless CCP just likes having an extra sub-forum. I don't know of any CSMs, this term or previous ones, that think highly of it. I look at Features & Ideas, etc... more than that place. In terms of a 'vehicle', one thing we've recently poked CCP about is making it easier / more intuitive for players to know how to contact the CSM to point us at ideas or suggestions. We already get quite a few folks that eve mail us, including a few people that seem to enjoy rounding up interesting topics to link us to on a regular basis. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Flamespar
Woof Club
445
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 05:06:00 -
[157] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Flamespar wrote:Thank you Selene for pushing for answers on Incarna. Many of us who have been waiting 5 years for CCP to deliver on its promise of Avatar gameplay are feeling largely abandoned by CCP. I'm really tired of arguing with trolls on the potential of Avatar gameplay in EVE.
the questions I would appreciate you passing on to CCP (or answering yourself if able) are: What happened to the Team Avatar blog regarding their prototyping? I'm actually waiting on an answer to that right now. Some scheduling issues have prevented me linking up with the right person(s) but I'm trying to get more than just a one or two sentence email reply. I'd like for CCP to publicly state what is going on here or authorize the CSM to do so. Flamespar wrote:Will we be able to ent the interiors of our POSs as part of the revamp? Still way too early to know that sort of thing. Flamespar wrote:Can we get expect anything (not clothing related) for Incara? That's what I'm working to find out.
Thanks Selene
One other question that I've seen pop up on the Dust beta forums from is that given the need for us to be able to meet and command Dust mers, will CCP be implementing station interiors as a means to enable this? I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4573
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 17:39:00 -
[158] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Malcanis wrote:Was a resolution ever reached as to a vehcle for player suggestions? Is it still worthwhile posting in The Assembly Hall or what? TBH, not really. The Assembly Hall really needs to be closed and I doubt it will survive the year unless CCP just likes having an extra sub-forum. I don't know of any CSMs, this term or previous ones, that think highly of it. I look at Features & Ideas, etc... more than that place. In terms of a 'vehicle', one thing we've recently poked CCP about is making it easier / more intuitive for players to know how to contact the CSM to point us at ideas or suggestions. We already get quite a few folks that eve mail us, including a few people that seem to enjoy rounding up interesting topics to link us to on a regular basis.
Thank you. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
SMT008
Les chevaliers de l'ordre Goonswarm Federation
457
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 13:31:00 -
[159] - Quote
Are Blackops getting a revamp anytime soon ? |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1944
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 14:02:00 -
[160] - Quote
SMT008 wrote:Are Blackops getting a revamp anytime soon ?
That is a safe assumption. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
|
Saede Riordan
Alexylva Paradox
260
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 15:09:00 -
[161] - Quote
Currently CSM voter turnout among certain voting blocs for the CSM is very low, simply, many people don't use the forums. Is a plan being made to add CSM voting directly into the game somehow to alleviate this? |
Zothike
Sacred Templar Knights ROL.Citizens
9
|
Posted - 2012.09.14 21:04:00 -
[162] - Quote
anything about a "minefield" concept ? |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1954
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 13:04:00 -
[163] - Quote
Saede Riordan wrote:Currently CSM voter turnout among certain voting blocs for the CSM is very low, simply, many people don't use the forums. Is a plan being made to add CSM voting directly into the game somehow to alleviate this?
This is certainly something that we are pushing for. More visibility = more votes. I would like to see a couple 'test runs' of such a thing before the next election cycle as well. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1954
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 13:05:00 -
[164] - Quote
Zothike wrote:anything about a "minefield" concept ?
Nothing even on paper beyond, "What?????" There's enough lag to deal with atm. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4622
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 13:30:00 -
[165] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Zothike wrote:anything about a "minefield" concept ? Nothing even on paper beyond, "What?????" There's enough lag to deal with atm.
Plus there are more than enough "defender" advantages in place already tbh. Mines would make gatecamping far too powerful.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
381
|
Posted - 2012.09.17 15:18:00 -
[166] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Rengerel en Distel wrote:Any more iterations on:
Unified Inventory - Window states still don't save. They also don't save different states between station/space. Yep. The UI is under constant revision. Rengerel en Distel wrote:Tooltips - Icon should be removed, smaller, should have more details. This is also being iterated on.
UnInv - They first stated they would work on it weekly until it was done. Then they said it would be worked on as they could. Now it's been 3 months without even a comment as far as I can see. (If i've missed something recently, please let me know) Could you get whomever is working on it to atleast post saying "HI, we know it's still not right, and we're going to keep working on it."
Tooltips - same thing as inventory. they said they'd work on it, putting in a slider for the popup timer, then they went quiet. if we're just stuck with it as is, atleast let us know, so we can put it in the bin of underdeveloped changes.
UI in general: is there any chance they'll just give up the files and let us mod them client-side?
|
Zothike
Sacred Templar Knights ROL.Citizens
10
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 12:11:00 -
[167] - Quote
too bad lag wise should be used of course as unique object managed like bubbles and for implementation it could be a good way to revamp 0.0 sovereignity, not using it as a "new weapon" only approach, but something like a new bonus too defender as you say, but costly both isk and time wise
and would be occasion for 2 new ship class, wil not name them, would be an insult to your intelligence :) |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1969
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 13:48:00 -
[168] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:Seleene wrote:Rengerel en Distel wrote:Any more iterations on:
Unified Inventory - Window states still don't save. They also don't save different states between station/space. Yep. The UI is under constant revision. Rengerel en Distel wrote:Tooltips - Icon should be removed, smaller, should have more details. This is also being iterated on. UnInv - They first stated they would work on it weekly until it was done. Then they said it would be worked on as they could. Now it's been 3 months without even a comment as far as I can see. (If i've missed something recently, please let me know) Could you get whomever is working on it to atleast post saying "HI, we know it's still not right, and we're going to keep working on it." Tooltips - same thing as inventory. they said they'd work on it, putting in a slider for the popup timer, then they went quiet. if we're just stuck with it as is, atleast let us know, so we can put it in the bin of underdeveloped changes.
I'll give him a poke and let him know that a public update would be appreciated.
Rengerel en Distel wrote:UI in general: is there any chance they'll just give up the files and let us mod them client-side?
Not a chance, nope. Client modded UI is something CCP has been against for a long time. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1971
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 17:02:00 -
[169] - Quote
Poked Arrow this morning and got a thread on the Inventory stuff posted:
LINKAGE CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
383
|
Posted - 2012.09.18 20:11:00 -
[170] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Poked Arrow this morning and got a thread on the Inventory stuff posted: LINKAGE
Thanks.
|
|
Flamespar
Woof Club
447
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 00:00:00 -
[171] - Quote
Say Selene.
Do you have any information on how subscriber number for EVE are trending at the moment? I would be interested to see if the refocus has had a positive effect on subscriber numbers. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1984
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 00:33:00 -
[172] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Say Selene.
Do you have any information on how subscriber number for EVE are trending at the moment? I would be interested to see if the refocus has had a positive effect on subscriber numbers.
That's not usually something we get talked to about until around Summit time and even then CCP doesn't really like to share except for when it hits milestones. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter! |
Dystopia Arkaral
test and tag
11
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 04:44:00 -
[173] - Quote
When the CSM started, did CCP actually ask you what you saw as the player/subscribers biggest X concerns about the game and if so what did you tell them |
Flamespar
Woof Club
448
|
Posted - 2012.09.21 00:47:00 -
[174] - Quote
One more request .. probably my last (no promises though )
This thread has been going on for quite a while and was started at Team Avatars suggestion Captains quarters ideas fixes and enhancements
It would be great if you could poke Team Avatar and ask them to respond to that thread, maybe get them to indicate if any of the suggestions are possible.
Cheers I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
Hrald
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
99
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 10:49:00 -
[175] - Quote
With a nerf to moons coming soon, will there be any buff to nullsec alliance incomes, whether through anomaly buffs for corporate taxes or other alternatives? It doesn't seem like sov is worth having anymore, perhaps something you can relate to, being in PL. |
Lord Zim
1558
|
Posted - 2012.09.28 10:50:00 -
[176] - Quote
...coming soon? :img_timeline:? Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4721
|
Posted - 2012.10.01 09:31:00 -
[177] - Quote
Hrald wrote:With a nerf to moons coming soon, will there be any buff to nullsec alliance incomes, whether through anomaly buffs for corporate taxes or other alternatives? It doesn't seem like sov is worth having anymore, perhaps something you can relate to, being in PL.
Income lost from tech moons will be balanced against income gains spread out amongst the other moon types. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
620
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 02:36:00 -
[178] - Quote
Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
631
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 11:24:00 -
[179] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Have you (seleene) given up on worm-hole stretchers, stabilizers, curling irons, washers and dryers?
Edit to add: And kick the devs in the shins and "ask nicely" if they will ever do Quarterly Econ Reports again? Last Seleene response Sept 09...
Three weeks since my last question.
Has this thread been abandoned like an unwanted child?
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1437
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 20:21:00 -
[180] - Quote
(I'll start with an easy one for you.)
Hey Seleene ... why you give up on this thread? Amarr Militia |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |