Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
210
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal? Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
baltec1
Bat Country
2038
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. |
Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1278
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
If CCP decides they don't like AFK ice mining, they better make it less hazardous to the human brain. |
James 315
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
2636
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ MinerBumping.com -½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½-½Now one of the most popular blogs in EVE. Find out why! |
Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Mordus Angels
530
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal? Yeah....
I am afraid mining is just that dull. Proactive gaming is limited to guessing when the cycle should be cut off if the asteroid is nearing completion, so you don't waste time sucking vacuum.
Entertainment sometimes provided by PvP ships showing up and attempting to gank. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |
Sexy Cakes
Poasting
91
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen. Not today spaghetti. |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
210
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 18:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen.
So if I work 12 hour shifts in an office and I can have even running in the background, alt tabbing back every however minutes it is to reactive then alt tabbing away isent an extreme case of afk mining? I would say it is and believe it, people do that.
Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
483
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal?
The specific "afk missioning" the dev was referring to had unlimited spawns of ships, so a pilot could leave their domi out for 24hrs straight and farm bounties....
Ice mining is the closest comparison, where you still have to return to your keyboard once per hour and take stuff to station.... also, with the diminishing price of ice, it's not nearly as profitable...
But you do bring up a good point.... Ice mining probably needs a mechanic change, where ice roids get mined out, so you need to retarget your mining lasers a little more frequently... |
Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1278
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen. So if I work 12 hour shifts in an office and I can have even running in the background, alt tabbing back every however minutes it is to reactive then alt tabbing away isent an extreme case of afk mining? I would say it is and believe it, people do that. Thats not extreme at all.
Extreme would be activate miners, leave for 23 hours, and come back with a ton of ore. |
Yokai Mitsuhide
Exiled Mining
1731
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will.
Hilarious how you say the rest of us will do something about it...when all you do yourself is whine. What are you exactly going to do about it? Whine more? |
|
Volar Kang
Quartz Research Strategic Alliance
28
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:08:00 -
[11] - Quote
James 315 wrote:And if they don't, the rest of us will.
I know you think you are on some Jihad but trust me, you dont speak for the "rest of us" James.
|
Din Chao
Seraphim Initiative Paradox Alliance
81
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen. So if I work 12 hour shifts in an office and I can have even running in the background, alt tabbing back every however minutes it is to reactive then alt tabbing away isent an extreme case of afk mining? I would say it is and believe it, people do that. I believe that when you don't touch your keyboard between hitting F1 and switching to the next target, you are AFK. People do that.
|
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
889
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal?
OMG, not even a potty-break ????
|
Jason Xado
Xado Industries
25
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:38:00 -
[14] - Quote
Keep in mind that AFK missioning is an ISK faucet where as AFK mining is not. |
Rats
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
188
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:39:00 -
[15] - Quote
James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will.
Yeah your bumping exploits really stop ppl mining.
Tal
-áI Fought the Law, and the Law Won... -áTalon Silverhawk-á |
baltec1
Bat Country
2042
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:41:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jason Xado wrote:Keep in mind that AFK missioning is an ISK faucet where as AFK mining is not.
AFK mining does however result in lower mineral prices. Good for us bad for miners. |
Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:43:00 -
[17] - Quote
It can't be an exploit if people are using and doing stuff exactly as CCP designed them to be used. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |
ashley Eoner
59
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen. So if I work 12 hour shifts in an office and I can have even running in the background, alt tabbing back every however minutes it is to reactive then alt tabbing away isent an extreme case of afk mining? I would say it is and believe it, people do that. I know people who basically do that with their job. No I don't mean akf eve but pretty much AFK the work they are supposed to be doing in the office..
Instead of whining about something how about you try to provide some "solutions"? It's quite a lot more difficult to decide how to solve the problem then whine about something.
Quote:I believe that when you don't touch your keyboard between hitting F1 and switching to the next target, you are AFK. People do that. THat's mission/plex running summed up in this game. I target some stuff hit f1 and then wait for something to happen. |
Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:50:00 -
[19] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:Quote:I believe that when you don't touch your keyboard between hitting F1 and switching to the next target, you are AFK. People do that. THat's mission/plex running summed up in this game. I target some stuff hit f1 and then wait for something to happen.
I'd say that's big-fleet operations 101. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
1124
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
Oh good, this thread is back.
OP, your first job is to go back and read the entire previous thread.
Go now.
You have no business on this topic until you read that one.
GO!
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
|
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
4742
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:52:00 -
[21] - Quote
Yes because as soon as the cycle ends and/or roid depletes or the cargo is full.... you magically can store more ore and earn money.
Ridiculous topic is ridiculous.
/c
|
|
Renan Ruivo
Irmandade Vera Cruz Alliance
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 19:54:00 -
[22] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Yes because as soon as the cycle ends and/or roid depletes or the cargo is full.... you magically can store more ore and earn money.
Ridiculous topic is ridiculous.
/c
Good gracious, the OP has been sarcastically facepalmed by Chribba.
OP should go hide in a hole. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die. |
Evei Shard
116
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nikk Narrel wrote:
I am afraid mining is just that dull. Proactive gaming is limited to guessing when the cycle should be cut off if the asteroid is nearing completion, so you don't waste time sucking vacuum.
That's what Excel is for. Profit favors the prepared |
Ensign X
152
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
Yokai Mitsuhide wrote:James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will. Hilarious how you say the rest of us will do something about it...when all you do yourself is whine. What are you exactly going to do about it? Whine more?
He does more than just whine. He bumps miners all day long. Check his killboard for proofs. Wait... there is no proof. I guess we'll just have to take his word that he's out there "making a difference". |
Helena Russell Makanen
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
(To OP) Actually reading a blog before posting might assist you in the future. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
975
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 20:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
There is also the ISBoxer issue. It looks like there are several barge swarms that are most likely ISBoxer run. That is, its one player controlling 10 or more ships all at once with the aid of ISBoxer. This is legal as the commands still are triggered by a player.
Player selects undock, ISBoxer clones the command, tells all ships to undock. Player tells ship to warp to the top bookmark (all the clients have a different top BM), ISBoxer tells all ships to warp to the top BM. Player tells ship to target the top item in the overview (which is set to ice), ISBoxer has all ships target nearest ice roid. Player turns on ice miners, ISBoxer tells all ships to turn on ice miners.
Half an hour later:
Player tells ship to dock, select all cargo and move to items. ISBoxer clones the commands.
Cycle repeats.
The profit from this will drop as the ice market gets glutted. That is quite different from afking complexes. But a low ice price also makes ice mining not a viable career unless you get 10 accounts and ISBoxer.
CCP: Maybe ISBoxer command cloning needs to be added to the list of things that are "patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play". http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Jason Xado
Xado Industries
25
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 21:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:
CCP: Maybe ISBoxer command cloning needs to be added to the list of things that are "patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play".
No. Multiboxing is a valid form of play in Eve Online.
And BTW, IsBoxer facilitates a lot more than just ice mining. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
975
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 21:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jason Xado wrote:Vincent Athena wrote:
CCP: Maybe ISBoxer command cloning needs to be added to the list of things that are "patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play".
No. Multiboxing is a valid form of play in Eve Online. And BTW, IsBoxer facilitates a lot more than just ice mining. Sure, multiboxing I got no issue with. But having all clients commanded simultaneously with the aid of software? CCP has said "OK". But in light of whats happening at ice fields, maybe that decision needs to be reconsidered. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Arec Bardwin
Perkone Caldari State
719
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:31:00 -
[29] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote: Sure, multiboxing I got no issue with. But having all clients commanded simultaneously with the aid of software? CCP has said "OK". But in light of whats happening at ice fields, maybe that decision needs to be reconsidered.
Since this type of gameplay (multiboxing several ice miners with ISboxer) concerns you that much, may we assume you have chosen Ice mining as your major profession then?
|
Pipa Porto
867
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:If CCP decides they don't like AFK ice mining, they better make it less hazardous to the human brain.
Like ratting's any better. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
624
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:43:00 -
[31] - Quote
I never really understood why ISboxer was allowed yet macros and automation are not. But it's entirely up to CCP to decide.
That isn't of course to say we can't make consequences ourselves for users of such programs if we feel it's necessary. We just can't ban anybody. :P http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
624
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:44:00 -
[32] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:If CCP decides they don't like AFK ice mining, they better make it less hazardous to the human brain. Like ratting's any better. It is - marginally. It also pays more. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Pipa Porto
867
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:54:00 -
[33] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Corina Jarr wrote:If CCP decides they don't like AFK ice mining, they better make it less hazardous to the human brain. Like ratting's any better. It is - marginally. It also pays more.
It only pays more because either more people prefer mining (meaning it's actually less soul crushing than ratting) or the increased ease of multiboxing makes it actually pay more for the market setters.
If it was actually a worse job and actually paid less, you'd think people would rat/run missions instead. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
975
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
Arec Bardwin wrote:Vincent Athena wrote: Sure, multiboxing I got no issue with. But having all clients commanded simultaneously with the aid of software? CCP has said "OK". But in light of whats happening at ice fields, maybe that decision needs to be reconsidered.
Since this type of gameplay (multiboxing several ice miners with ISboxer) concerns you that much, may we assume you have chosen Ice mining as your major profession then? Actually its not. I do many things, industry, ore mining, exploration, missions, trading, all using my alts, and this pilot lives in W-space. But I do ice mine now and then, and would like the ISK to not be driven to oblivion. I also have concern for other players who do use ice mining as their main profession. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Infinite Force
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
132
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:32:00 -
[35] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:....I also have concern for other players who do use ice mining as their main profession. People need to just relax a bit.
>> You realize that if everyone was a CEO, nothing would get done? (no one to do the work)
>> You realize that if everyone was a grunt, nothing would get done? (no one to give direction/orders)
If someone wants to PvP their life away, great.
If someone wants to mine ice all day, great.
If someone wants to market trade all day (without leaving the station), great.
Isn't EVE great! HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud
Hammer Mineral Compression - The only way to go! |
Carlton Foster
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:35:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:There is also the ISBoxer issue. It looks like there are several barge swarms that are most likely ISBoxer run. That is, its one player controlling 10 or more ships all at once with the aid of ISBoxer. This is legal as the commands still are triggered by a player.
Player selects undock, ISBoxer clones the command, tells all ships to undock. Player tells ship to warp to the top bookmark (all the clients have a different top BM), ISBoxer tells all ships to warp to the top BM. Player tells ship to target the top item in the overview (which is set to ice), ISBoxer has all ships target nearest ice roid. Player turns on ice miners, ISBoxer tells all ships to turn on ice miners.
Half an hour later:
Player tells ship to dock, select all cargo and move to items. ISBoxer clones the commands.
Cycle repeats.
The profit from this will drop as the ice market gets glutted. That is quite different from afking complexes. But a low ice price also makes ice mining not a viable career unless you get 10 accounts and ISBoxer.
CCP: Maybe ISBoxer command cloning needs to be added to the list of things that are "patterns of play that facilitate acquisition of items, currency, objects, character attributes, rank or status at an accelerated rate when compared with ordinary Game play".
If they got rid of IsBoxer then Eve would no longer be an MMO-RTS. That would make me sad :-( |
C O'Brien
Android Gang Stealth Syndicate
9
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:36:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nikk Narrel wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal? Yeah.... I am afraid mining is just that dull. |
Uris Vitgar
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 23:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
Is afk manufacturing and exploit? Is afk skill training an exploit? Is afk PI an exploit? Clearly not. It seems the only problem is mining is too easy, espescially ice mining. Whether you have your eyes glued to the screen or not has nothing to do with it |
non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
828
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 00:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I never really understood why ISboxer was allowed yet macros and automation are not. But it's entirely up to CCP to decide.
That isn't of course to say we can't make consequences ourselves for users of such programs if we feel it's necessary. We just can't ban anybody. :P Iirc, the reason they gave is that with ISBoxer, you still have to be there pressing the buttons. When you use macros, you don't have to be at the computer. They just want people to be in control and not an automated process. |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
225
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 01:42:00 -
[40] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks.
isnt that what Goons are for? "Emergent gameplay" and all? http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
625
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 02:21:00 -
[41] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. isnt that what Goons are for? "Emergent gameplay" and all? Sure, when it's actually, I don't know, playing the game. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1302
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 03:11:00 -
[42] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. isnt that what Goons are for? "Emergent gameplay" and all? Sure, when it's actually, I don't know, playing the game. I don't know, Jabber online is a pretty great thing.
And now, I can even just zip over to themittani.com and read about the recent happenings. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
674
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 03:46:00 -
[43] - Quote
the dev post was about afking in a plex with drones out and repping them in a way that you and your drones wouldn't die, ever, you would log in and sit there all day log in the next day 400mil or so richer. |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
211
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 06:55:00 -
[44] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:the dev post was about afking in a plex with drones out and repping them in a way that you and your drones wouldn't die, ever, you would log in and sit there all day log in the next day 400mil or so richer.
I see it being no different from hitting your module once an hour and going AFK. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 07:33:00 -
[45] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:the dev post was about afking in a plex with drones out and repping them in a way that you and your drones wouldn't die, ever, you would log in and sit there all day log in the next day 400mil or so richer. I see it being no different from hitting your module once an hour and going AFK.
Still different from "launch your drones and start repping them and check back after 8+ hours". |
Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
211
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 08:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Gibbo3771 wrote:Herping yourDerp wrote:the dev post was about afking in a plex with drones out and repping them in a way that you and your drones wouldn't die, ever, you would log in and sit there all day log in the next day 400mil or so richer. I see it being no different from hitting your module once an hour and going AFK. Still different from "launch your drones and start repping them and check back after 8+ hours".
So if someone was to mine while not at there screen while only coming back once the cargo is full, which could be over and hour would not be classed as extreme, fair enough if they only do it a couple days a week but if your doing it 7 days a week then I would say its an extreme case of AFK activities.
I also did read the blob and I should have been a bit more specific. Everytime you dont like my comments/posts the terrorists win and your a disgrace to your country. |
Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
541
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 08:09:00 -
[47] - Quote
James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will.
The rest of us?
Do not put your personal weird obsession with miners, onto the general Eve population.
You want fries with that? |
Sabrina Solette
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 09:38:00 -
[48] - Quote
Nothing wrong with afk mining, although semi-afk is preferable and less risky.
Think it used to take me about 10 minutes to fill up a Hulk which did not use mining mods but had cargo expanders.
So the choices were:
1) to sit watching the screen blankly for 10 minutes at a time.
2) Mine semi-afk (at computer doing non game activities i.e. watch a film or read a book)
3) Go afk and just come back to check every now and then.
I used to opt for option 2 by reading a book whilst mining, because I'm just not brain dead enough to watch the screen blankly for 10 minutes at a time and I liked to be near so as to respond to changing circumstances. |
Cyprus Black
Perkone Caldari State
346
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 09:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal? Because afk mission running takes planning and effort to achieve. Mining mechanics dictate that you turn on lasers and wait... and wait... and wait. It doesn't even really matter if they're at their keyboard or not because the gameplay is the same regardless and that's by CCPs design. Not the players.
Hijinks of a highsec pirate http://cyprusblack.blogspot.com/ |
Dennis Gregs
Dawn of Fire
29
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 09:54:00 -
[50] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. No they don't have to and they won't.
You guys don't seem to realize why plex farming is considered and exploit. The reason is that it needs no user input whatsoever. |
|
Arec Bardwin
Perkone Caldari State
719
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 10:06:00 -
[51] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote: So if someone was to mine while not at there screen while only coming back once the cargo is full, which could be over and hour would not be classed as extreme, fair enough if they only do it a couple days a week but if your doing it 7 days a week then I would say its an extreme case of AFK activities.
You want to force ice miners to stay at the screen and watch the cycle finish, or limit the amount of hours miners are allowed to mine per week?
Disclaimer; I don't mine, never will, never has (well, I did mine a few miner frigate cargo holds back in the day, until I thought "**** this")
|
Mara Rinn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1810
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:07:00 -
[52] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks.
They just did.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
616
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:If you read the post about that afk plexing it was an extreme circumstance and the guy was doing it 23/7 with one activation cycle a day.
We're not talking about a cycle or 2 on an ice miner here.
Don't be a drama queen. So if I work 12 hour shifts in an office and I can have even running in the background, alt tabbing back every however minutes it is to reactive then alt tabbing away isent an extreme case of afk mining? I would say it is and believe it, people do that.
No it's not, because likely as not one of these days you will alt-tab back to suddenly find yourself in a station, or at least floating in a pod in the belt. |
Sakura Kasenumi
Last Exit For The Lost Dark Therapy
3
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 11:49:00 -
[54] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal?
I ice mine. My ship fills with ice in 48 minutes, what should I be doing in those 48 minutes? Pretending to direct my mining lasers and making a sort of long peeeeeeeewpeeeeeeeeeeeeeew and asteroid explosion noises? People dont mine afk by their own design, afk mining is by game design. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1302
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 12:21:00 -
[55] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will. The rest of us? Do not put your personal weird obsession with miners, onto the general Eve population. James 315 uses them as a means of production in his giev isk or bump VCbee scheme.
In a way, it acts like a tax on mining. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Agent Akari
Hobo Industries Inc
13
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 13:28:00 -
[56] - Quote
make asteroids shoot back. |
highonpop
Eve Liberation Force Fatal Ascension
257
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 13:45:00 -
[57] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
You hit your modules and go afk until the cycle is done.
Yet recently went emo in a dev blob about "afk missioning" with drones is not acceptable game play because you are not actually present at your computer
Whats the deal?
The "afk missioning" problem was not missions. It was DED sites that would perma-spawn. People would set sentry drones to aggressive so they would attack on their own, and just set reps on them and walk away for the entire day.
Even 100% AFK miners will have to come back and do some clicks at some point. The mining barges have a finite amount of ORE capacity and the asteroids have a finite amount of ORE in them. IF you set your miners and go AFK all day, your toon will only really be mining for an hour TOPS
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/Very%20best%20of%20Makalu%20Zarya |
Jimmy Gunsmythe
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
149
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 13:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
non judgement wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I never really understood why ISboxer was allowed yet macros and automation are not. But it's entirely up to CCP to decide.
That isn't of course to say we can't make consequences ourselves for users of such programs if we feel it's necessary. We just can't ban anybody. :P Iirc, the reason they gave is that with ISBoxer, you still have to be there pressing the buttons. When you use macros, you don't have to be at the computer. They just want people to be in control and not an automated process.
Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways. It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal. |
Ensign X
156
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 14:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways.
You mean, besides the people who use ISBoxer and also besides CCP who reaps the benefits of people who use ISBoxer? Yeah, who cares about them... |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
170
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 14:26:00 -
[60] - Quote
highonpop wrote:Even 100% AFK miners will have to come back and do some clicks at some point. The mining barges have a finite amount of ORE capacity and the asteroids have a finite amount of ORE in them. IF you set your miners and go AFK all day, your toon will only really be mining for an hour TOPS
Hour: mining ice A lot less time mining ore.
Even Mack's ore bay will fill in around 30 minutes. That's of course if you happen to find big enough roid. |
|
Toroup
Prometheus Deep Core Mining and Salvage
35
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 14:33:00 -
[61] - Quote
James 315 wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. And if they don't, the rest of us will.
OOOHHHHHH Scary!!!!!
Come find me. Make it your own personal Eve mission. Come hunt down old Toroup. Find me if you can among the shining fields of ice, and there you find your icy grave.
In all seriousness, Ice mining is a horrible isk/hour proposition. People who AFK it for the minimal isk that it provides should just be look at as NPC vendors. It's basically 8:1 right now - it takes about 8 hours of ice mining to equal 1 hour of level 4 missioning.
As far as fixing mining, they should incorporate a mechanic like having to align the beams or something to max yield. As a the mining beams run, they get out of alignment and there could be a dial that you have to adjust to realign them. Aligned beams create 100% yield, where misaligned beams degrade yield down to 0% as they progress. In doing this, people could still AFK if they wanted to but their yield would be affected. The best yield would be the people who are ATK and keep the beams aligned (maybe it's an alignment adjustment randomly from 30 secs to 5 mins). |
Janet Patton
Brony Express
48
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 15:02:00 -
[62] - Quote
Everyone who is not a miner, should love afk miners. It drives the cost down of everything that you buy. Why do I have this sig? I don't smoke. |
Pipa Porto
870
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 16:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Gibbo3771 wrote:So lets say you are NOT using a macro.
Something about this OP had been nagging at the back of my mind for a while, and I just figured it out.
The start of the OP is mentioning not using a bot as a hypothetical situation. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Solstice Project
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1730
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 16:43:00 -
[64] - Quote
Janet Patton wrote:Everyone who is not a miner, should love afk miners. It drives the cost down of everything that you buy. Which isn't necessarily a good thing, although cheapskates might believe so. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
1287
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 18:55:00 -
[65] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:non judgement wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I never really understood why ISboxer was allowed yet macros and automation are not. But it's entirely up to CCP to decide.
That isn't of course to say we can't make consequences ourselves for users of such programs if we feel it's necessary. We just can't ban anybody. :P Iirc, the reason they gave is that with ISBoxer, you still have to be there pressing the buttons. When you use macros, you don't have to be at the computer. They just want people to be in control and not an automated process. Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways. The commands are not cloned. They are sent directly to the clients.
Its not emulating commands, it is allowing the mouse/keyboard to send their commands to more than one location. |
Pipa Porto
874
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 20:48:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways.
It's no different from using hardware/software that allows one keyboard to control multiple computers at the same time. Or the spectacular invention by the guy who made a 100% Hardware multibox setup using wooden dowels and such to chain a half dozen mice and keyboards back when CCP refused to whitelist ISBoxer.
There's no emulating the commands, it's just, in effect, a beam splitter. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
331
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 20:54:00 -
[67] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks.
I think the only thing they could dotostop AFK ice mining is to drastically reduce the loooooooooooooong cycle time to orcethepilots back to the computer once every 5 minutes instead of once per hour =========================================================
EVE residents: 5% Wormholes; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec. CSM 6: 100% Nullsec residents. EVE demographics vs CSM demographics, nothing to worry about... |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
705
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 22:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice and mining in general so players don't sleep in front of their computer when they should be PLAYING
Fixed 4U brb |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
228
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 23:42:00 -
[69] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. isnt that what Goons are for? "Emergent gameplay" and all? Sure, when it's actually, I don't know, playing the game.
I think I just said that... Given that "sponsoring emergent gameplay" IS playing the game
and ganking miners IS playing the game
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |
Jason Xado
Xado Industries
26
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 16:48:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:
Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways.
Everything is IsBoxer is still manual. IsBoxer does 2 things.
1.) It broadcasts your mouse and key clicks to multiple clients at the same time. Which is extremely useful. However you still have to be at the keyboard and click the button. Nothing is automated.
2.) IsBoxer also has a feature (called VideoFX) that allows you to place parts of one screen onto another screen. This effectively allows you to control multiple screens without having to jump from screen to screen, which is very useful. Here is a screenshot of my mining setup to illustrate ( http://wiki.eveonline.com/wikiEN/images/4/43/Screen1.jpg ). Again, everything is manual, nothing is automated.
Obviously using IsBoxer is not the same as not using it, otherwise noone would be using it. People need to just get used to the fact the multiboxing is a vibrant part of Eve Online. For me it is what actually makes the game interesting to play as I prefer to be the master of my own empire on my own time schedule, then a peon in someone elses empire on thier time schedule. But that's just me and my humble opinion :-) |
|
Optimo Sebiestor
The Society Calyxes
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 23:17:00 -
[71] - Quote
I find afk mining a nice niche while playing Dust 514. |
Evei Shard
116
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 23:58:00 -
[72] - Quote
Toroup wrote: As far as fixing mining, they should incorporate a mechanic like having to align the beams or something to max yield. As a the mining beams run, they get out of alignment and there could be a dial that you have to adjust to realign them. Aligned beams create 100% yield, where misaligned beams degrade yield down to 0% as they progress. In doing this, people could still AFK if they wanted to but their yield would be affected. The best yield would be the people who are ATK and keep the beams aligned (maybe it's an alignment adjustment randomly from 30 secs to 5 mins).'
Additionally, adding something like PI scanning would work well. Get rid of the high yield rocks and just have high yield zones on a rock. So the overall process could be:
Warp to a field lock a rock Scan the rock Target the high yield areas of the rock Align the beams Mine Repeat
The AFKer could just lock and mine and that could give the standard yield rocks and the overall yield would diminish as the beams become misaligned. ATK miners could actively target the high yield areas of the rocks and keep the beams aligned to maximize yield and rock type.
Ah the things I think of when I'm high.
The problem with all these ideas is that while they are really good, they kill the game for people who mine with more than one character at a time. The time involved with aligning 6, 9, 12 or more lasers would cause most people to simply take the yield hit and deal with the diminishing returns provided in your idea. The end result there is CCP devs spending a ton of time implementing something that would not be used. Time they could have spent working on other things.
Profit favors the prepared |
Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
71
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 00:36:00 -
[73] - Quote
Evei Shard wrote:The problem with all these ideas is that while they are really good, they kill the game for people who mine with more than one character at a time. No. It would kill it for people who want to mine with multiple accounts at a time AFK.
Having to spend time mining is the general idea behind, you know, trying to fix AFK mining |
Evei Shard
116
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 00:48:00 -
[74] - Quote
Pohbis wrote:Evei Shard wrote:The problem with all these ideas is that while they are really good, they kill the game for people who mine with more than one character at a time. No. It would kill it for people who want to mine with multiple accounts at a time AFK. Having to spend time mining is the general idea behind, you know, trying to fix AFK mining
I mine ATK with an Orca and 3 hulks. It is anything but an AFK deal if you want to maximize yield without turrets sitting with no rock to shoot at for a cycle or two.
Oh, and if some people were not aware, it's still possible to gank a hulk, so don't forget doing repetitive ATK tasks like using D-scan, local, etc.
Little games that would hinder yield in order to prevent AFK mining would probably increase AFK mining and decrease subscriptions. Profit favors the prepared |
Pohbis
Neo T.E.C.H.
71
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 01:09:00 -
[75] - Quote
Evei Shard wrote:Little games that would hinder yield in order to prevent AFK mining would probably increase AFK mining and decrease subscriptions. Or, they could mine with less accounts and get the same yield, while playing the "little game".
Which is the real reason why CCP wont do anything about the current mining mechanics. It would cut into subscribed accounts.
Instead, they'll keep the current way for people who like minimal effort gameplay, and introduce a new mining mechanic were they can build an involving mechanic from scratch for those who actually like mining, instead of trying to change the current one which is inherently just; not fun.
No idea if ring mining will ever make it in the game tho.
|
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2124
|
Posted - 2012.09.10 01:13:00 -
[76] - Quote
Why not have a popup to click and if you don't you get a little afk icon over your ship.... then let come what may "A genius throws a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that he's going to die choking in a maze of smoke and flame. A hero drinks a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that if he does a split in midair, he can hit twice as many zombies per kick. Drunk hero wins again, wusses." ~Cracked.com |
Oxylan
Fuss Roo Dah
17
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:22:00 -
[77] - Quote
Try understand.
1.We are not a CCP slaves, we got rights to be afk every time when we need to be afk, even if CCP is against afk gaming style or they got specific gaming philosophy anty afk.
2. I can mining ore while im afk so long like i want, im not a robot im human, again i have right to be afk , the worse thing that may happens is overload cargo after few minyts while im afk, if i go to deep afk the worse thing that may hapens is a not active mining barge - exhumer blow up to some kamikaze because of afk reason.
3.We got familis jobs etc, again we are humans not robots.
4. Stop care or living with obsesion about bots, you pay for this game mothly fee, you have right to be afk, , enjoy game, you pay for it, bring your macinav to ice field activate strip miners and go afk, it wont earn much money... If it bleed we can kill it. |
Pipa Porto
892
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:35:00 -
[78] - Quote
Oxylan wrote:Try understand.
1.We are not a CCP slaves, we got rights to be afk every time when we need to be afk, even if CCP is against afk gaming style or they got specific gaming philosophy anty afk.
2. I can mining ore while im afk so long like i want, im not a robot im human, again i have right to be afk , the worse thing that may happens is overload cargo after few minyts while im afk, if i go to deep afk the worse thing that may hapens is a not active mining barge - exhumer blow up to some kamikaze because of afk reason.
3.We got familis jobs etc, again we are humans not robots.
4. Stop care or living with obsesion about bots, you pay for this game mothly fee, you have right to be afk, , enjoy game, you pay for it, bring your macinav to ice field activate strip miners and go afk, it wont earn much money...
1. Yep you certainly have the right to be AFK, but why do you feel you have the right to be AFK, Safe, and Making money all at the same time?
2. That's the problem. While Industrialized Suicide Ganking isn't possible, the worst that's likely to happen to you when you go AFK is some lost yield. People mining while AFK reduces the value of the time people spend mining while at the computer.
3. If you have a family or work commitment, I would suggest docking up and/or logging off. Most people, when family or work commitments interfere with their leisure activities, suspend their leisure activity until they've taken care of the family or work commitment. Docking up takes all of 5 seconds, and logging off is even faster.
4. Again, why do you feel you have the right to be AFK, Safe, and Make money all at the same time? It devalues the effort of other players who don't go AFK.
Finally, it seems that you're defending botting, which (if an accurate interpretation of your post) is not going to make you popular with miners or anyone, really. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
658
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:36:00 -
[79] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks. isnt that what Goons are for? "Emergent gameplay" and all? Sure, when it's actually, I don't know, playing the game. I think I just said that... Given that "sponsoring emergent gameplay" IS playing the gameand ganking miners IS playing the game Oh, I was referring to the AFK ice miners. Not sure why I thought that's what you were talking about. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1033
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:non judgement wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:I never really understood why ISboxer was allowed yet macros and automation are not. But it's entirely up to CCP to decide.
That isn't of course to say we can't make consequences ourselves for users of such programs if we feel it's necessary. We just can't ban anybody. :P Iirc, the reason they gave is that with ISBoxer, you still have to be there pressing the buttons. When you use macros, you don't have to be at the computer. They just want people to be in control and not an automated process. Quite understood, but if the program clones commands, it's not quite the same as the person manually doing the commands himself. If using ISBoxer is the same as not using it, then no one should have a problem with CCP prohibiting the use of a program to emulate commands anyways. The commands are not cloned. They are sent directly to the clients. Its not emulating commands, it is allowing the mouse/keyboard to send their commands to more than one location.
Which you can only do by emulating a mouse/keyboard via software on the other locations.
ISBoxer is botting. It's just attended botting, which is significantly more ethical than the bots that the rest of the miners use. |
|
Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
1035
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:56:00 -
[81] - Quote
Evei Shard wrote:The problem with all these ideas is that while they are really good, they kill the game for people who mine with more than one character at a time. The time involved with aligning 6, 9, 12 or more lasers would cause most people to simply take the yield hit and deal with the diminishing returns provided in your idea. The end result there is CCP devs spending a ton of time implementing something that would not be used. Time they could have spent working on other things.
Wait, since when is "killing the game for people who mine with more than one character at a time" -- i.e., botters -- a bad thing?
Seriously, if there was a combat situation that would allow me to run Sanctums in Nullsec on 23 accounts at the same time, it would get nerfed within days, if not hours. And it bloody well should be. (Unless it has the name "Faction Warfare" in the title, then it can stick around for 3-4 months apparently.)
I'm sorry that mining is such a horrifically boring activity that you people can't be bothered to actually play the game they're, in theory, enjoying, but the solution has to involve making it more fun and engaging. Crippling the mining revamp by also including "but it should also be something we should be able to do while completely AFK" is asinine whining from entitled prats.
In short, any mining revamp MUST include changes to make it impossible to AFK -- i.e. Bot -- mine. Otherwise we'll just return to the current situation of people forced to either bot mine or play the game virtually indistinguishable from a bot to compete. |
Pipa Porto
892
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 04:14:00 -
[82] - Quote
Xython wrote:Which you can only do by emulating a mouse/keyboard via software on the other locations.
ISBoxer is botting. It's just attended botting, which is significantly more ethical than the bots that the rest of the miners use.
Or, as the guy who finally got CCP to whitelist ISBoxer proved, by creating a hilarious and over the top hardware solution. ISBoxer's ability to clone mouse commands doesn't allow you to do anything you couldn't do with some wooden dowels, packing tape, and a giant desk surface area.
For details on how to avoid paying ISBoxer's ~$20 annual subscription fee by using a hardware solution, click here.
ISBoxer is a more elegant way to tie a bunch of mice together with wooden dowels and packing tape, and performs the same functions as doing so. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Infinite Force
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
140
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 05:55:00 -
[83] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Xython wrote:Which you can only do by emulating a mouse/keyboard via software on the other locations.
ISBoxer is botting. It's just attended botting, which is significantly more ethical than the bots that the rest of the miners use. Or, as the guy who finally got CCP to whitelist ISBoxer proved, by creating a hilarious and over the top hardware solution. ISBoxer's ability to clone mouse commands doesn't allow you to do anything you couldn't do with some wooden dowels, packing tape, and a giant desk surface area. For details on how to avoid paying ISBoxer's ~$20 annual subscription fee by using a hardware solution, click here. ISBoxer is a more elegant way to tie a bunch of mice together with wooden dowels and packing tape, and performs the same functions as doing so. I've been looking for that link for a while - completely forgot where to find it... Thanks!
I so completely love his "over-the-top" setup. HROLT CEO Live Free; Die Proud
Hammer Mineral Compression - The only way to go! |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
172
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 11:01:00 -
[84] - Quote
Xython wrote:In short, any mining revamp MUST include changes to make it impossible to AFK -- i.e. Bot -- mine. Otherwise we'll just return to the current situation of people forced to either bot mine or play the game virtually indistinguishable from a bot to compete.
Could you tell us how it is possible to miner to AFK 24 hours in a Hulk?
Hint: It's not possible. |
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
172
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 11:05:00 -
[85] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Yep you certainly have the right to be AFK, but why do you feel you have the right to be AFK, Safe, and Making money all at the same time?
Unless you know way to prevent other players from buying modules, ships, ore, stuff from me while I'm on station and AFK... |
gobbybobby
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
10
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 11:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Xython wrote:In short, any mining revamp MUST include changes to make it impossible to AFK -- i.e. Bot -- mine. Otherwise we'll just return to the current situation of people forced to either bot mine or play the game virtually indistinguishable from a bot to compete. Could you tell us how it is possible to miner to AFK 24 hours in a Hulk? Hint: It's not possible.
Lots of coffee? And be an extremely boring or easy to amuse person. |
highonpop
Eve Liberation Force Fatal Ascension
272
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 13:42:00 -
[87] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP will most likely have to do something about ice mining macks.
make it so Ice mining is comparable to regular mining.
The reason people AFK/BOT mine Ice is because it takes hours and hours to get enough to be useful. The Ice mechanic itself is broken, not the miners. It should no take you 5-6 hours of Ice mining just to run 1 POS for 1 Week. If it were not for Botting Ice miners, POS fuel would be much more expensive than it is.
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/Very%20best%20of%20Makalu%20Zarya |
Tort Funaila
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 19:20:00 -
[88] - Quote
Volar Kang wrote:James 315 wrote:And if they don't, the rest of us will. I know you think you are on some Jihad but trust me, you dont speak for the "rest of us" James.
He was elected to do exactly that. I just hope he agrees to serve on the CSM; we need his leadership badly. |
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
152
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 20:39:00 -
[89] - Quote
OMG this thread is just full of fail.
No matter what CCP, tries to do, or even succeeds in doing, the poor asshats without real jobs sitting at home will very quickly find new work arounds and ways to exploit the new system. Stop asking for something that is not possible. it will only hurt the game and the players who actually play it. the bots and exploiters will find a way around any fix they implement.
CCP has developed a method of tracking, monitoring, and punishing botters. It has been very effective, but the botters will always find new ways around it. Learn to live with it or stop playing MMO's. Every MMO contains players that live for nothing other than finding ways to exploit the game.
I hate bots as much as the next guy, I do AFK mine. I also have a very large network of very passive income PI. I have a real job and a real life. I also have 4 active accounts in EVE. When I am at work I often have EVE running in the back ground with my mining crew set up for 5-6 hours out of a day. I can not run missions, go ratting, or PVP during this time as I am at work and would most likely get fired. When I get home I have two young children that want to spend time with daddy. These are my priorities, work and family.
When I do have time to actually sit down and play EVE I want to spend it doing activities I enjoy. AFK mining, and PI while at work gives me the isk to do that.
Why should my game play get nerfed? Why should my subscriptions be worth less than some jobless asshat that sits on his couch playing video games all day?
It should not and is not.
If you want to discuss real ethics. Some of the biggest PVPers and null sec legends are actually in real life lazy bums sitting in their parents basement, with no real job skills, and have no life outside of the game. Really what type of game play should be discouraged? the hard working tax payer who plays the game for simple enjoyment and recreation as video games are supposed to be? Or the lazy asshat who has no life outside of the game and is nothing but a burden on society?
it is just a game, grow up and get your priorities straight. |
Pipa Porto
895
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 20:41:00 -
[90] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Yep you certainly have the right to be AFK, but why do you feel you have the right to be AFK, Safe, and Making money all at the same time? Unless you know way to prevent other players from buying modules, ships, ore, stuff from me while I'm on station and AFK...
The risk in trading while AFK is the risk that you lose money on trades due to market changes and other things. Which you can't react to because you're, wait for it, AFK.
So, to our 3 part checklist, is trading: Possible while AFK? Yes. Profitable while AFK? Maybe. Safe? No. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |