EVE Search - If we pod someone, do they lose their aurum clothing?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

If we pod someone, do they lose their aurum clothing?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:17:00 - [1] Read topic.
Tippia Sunshine and Lollipops	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:18:00 - [2] Not if they're wearing it. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:22:00 - [3] Wow, First in-destructable asset in the game, equipped clothing. In-destructible item that holds value and can be transported by self destructing a pod, nice.
Wacktopia Dark Side Of The Womb	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:22:00 - [4] I think you're naked in your pod.... BUT if you undock somewhere else then your clothing is magically there unlike any other item in game? Hmmm... the immersion breach is deeper than we first thought.
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:24:00 - [5] Originally by: Wacktopia I think you're naked in your pod.... BUT if you undock somewhere else then your clothing is magically there unlike any other item in game? Hmmm... the immersion breach is deeper than we first thought. And I bet all your jump clones instantly have a copy too.
Keltas Mortermain	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:25:00 - [6] could say that well ur clothes pattern are stored digitally in ur ships data base and when you dock at a new station they are premade ready for you to put back on you leave there destroyed. or....gandalf shrugs
Rex Liberium	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:27:00 - [7] But...but...the monocle is an implant. So it should be destroyed.
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:29:00 - [8] Originally by: Keltas Mortermain could say that well ur clothes pattern are stored digitally in ur ships data base and when you dock at a new station they are premade ready for you to put back on you leave there destroyed. or....gandalf shrugs You don't get it., using aurum it is possible to instantly transport billions of isk in assets simply by dying or jump cloning to a station, whatever the distance.
Merdaneth Amarr Defensores Fidei Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:29:00 - [9] Originally by: Rex Liberium But...but...the monocle is an implant. So it should be destroyed. The items are so expensive because they provide a duplicate at each station in EVE.... ____ The Illusion of Freedom \| The Truth about Slavery
Keltas Mortermain	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:29:00 - [10] Originally by: Rex Liberium But...but...the monocle is an implant. So it should be destroyed. erm erm erm be gone logic is not welcome here

Wacktopia Dark Side Of The Womb	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:29:00 - [11] What a joke.
Reathe Gallente	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:32:00 - [12] Maybe the vanity items come with "pod travel insurance" that promises to replace any item lost, stolen or damaged. Would also explain why they seem a bit expensive (high risk you see)
Boxless	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:32:00 - [13] CCP should just implement a shared global item/ship hangar and be done with it.
Wacktopia Dark Side Of The Womb	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:37:00 - [14] Originally by: Boxless CCP should just implement a shared global item/ship hangar and be done with it. Was just sick a little in my mouth.
Serpents smile	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:39:00 - [15] You know I've been lolling all over GD today but this thing irks me off. How come if you fly around with plexes they can be destroyed but not the clothing you wear? I mean that is serious money. And whatever you can buy for clothing now is serious money too. How is that magically WORLD OF WARCRAFT LIKE re-spawning of "destroyed" items working anyway? People said that the MT store was a slippery slope, I laughed. But now it looks like they where right. I don't like the all doom & gloom visions, but the first mayor non-EVE like thing has hit the servers with near indestructible non-player made, (overpriced) vanity items. I wonder what is next on CCP's list to become (near) indestructible or unprobable. Wonder when we get mission instances for AU.
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:42:00 - [16] Originally by: Serpents smile You know I've been lolling all over GD today but this thing irks me off. How come if you fly around with plexes they can be destroyed but not the clothing you wear? I mean that is serious money. And whatever you can buy for clothing now is serious money too. How is that magically WORLD OF WARCRAFT LIKE re-spawning of "destroyed" items working anyway? People said that the MT store was a slippery slope, I laughed. But now it looks like they where right. I don't like the all doom & gloom visions, but the first mayor non-EVE like thing has hit the servers with near indestructible non-player made, (overpriced) vanity items. I wonder what is next on CCP's list to become (near) indestructible or unprobable. Wonder when we get mission instances for AU. Slippery Slope fallacy is only relevant if decisions/people are logical. When things are done illogically, it is a perfectly valid argument.
dkbjitawhore	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:50:00 - [17] I refuse to believe this is the first this issue is being brought to light. One of the first things all eve players do when they hear about something new is ask how they can blow it up/destroy it. Bad game design or game design got ignored in favor of the almighty $$.
LiquidatorBrunt	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:51:00 - [18] i guess I would have to point out you have always been able to send large sums of money, instantly and at no risk... i see where everyone is coming from though, it's very worrying
Rhys Thoth	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:56:00 - [19] They should just put a Maker in each CQ, and have NEX purchases be patterns for it. Also it should get addicted to cyber-drugs. That or make them droppable. Confirming that podding for boots is win.
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:56:00 - [20] Originally by: LiquidatorBrunt i guess I would have to point out you have always been able to send large sums of money, instantly and at no risk... The point is that it is an asset, that if you possess, can be near-instantly moved someplace where you can off-load it for the highest price. Let's say you buy something cheap in one of the outer regions and want to re-sell it in Jita for maximum profit, you can move the item with 0 risk if you equip it and get podded or jumpclone.

Adrauss 9 Caldari Neuromancer Inc	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:57:00 - [21] I would imagine that once you wear an item , it becomes non transferable .
Boxless	Posted - 2011.06.22 10:59:00 - [22] Originally by: Adrauss 9 I would imagine that once you wear an item , it becomes non transferable . Do we really want soul-binding/attunement in EVE?
Siigari Kitawa Gallente Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:02:00 - [23] Edited by: Siigari Kitawa on 22/06/2011 11:02:12 Originally by: Boxless Originally by: Adrauss 9 I would imagine that once you wear an item , it becomes non transferable . Do we really want soul-binding/attunement in EVE? We have that already. They're called implants. Once you use one, it's yours. www.siigarikitawa.com ò www.eohpoker.com ò Buy a GTC
Madcow Minmatar Sebiestor Tribe	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:03:00 - [24] What does it matter if the item is moved with you as you say assets you can say you pay aurum for a design and your ship makes it with nanites. And the money wise would have been handiers if you didnt buy it if its for that because then you would have had isk in your wallet and its even easyer to transfer. ______________________ I am just a crazy cow
MBrace Amarr Hikivirta Test Alliance Please Ignore	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:08:00 - [25] It is my understanding that anything purchased with Aurum can be either used or sold, not both. If you use the item you can use it indefinitely but it cannot be sold or un-used. If you buy the Item but do not use it you may transport it at will to be sold anywhere but also destroyed anywhere. It basically works similar to PLEX. Hope that makes sense.
Rhys Thoth	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:08:00 - [26] The problem isn't with the ability to be magically wearing your prada shoes wherever you end up. The issue is being able to put on said shoes, fly to a hub without any risk of losing them and then take them off and sell them. This is bad. Make it a pattern, have crafted by your nanite swarm wherever you end up being. I don't think anyone cares about how pimp your shoes are. If you want to sell that pattern though, then your copies should be destroyed and you should have to move it the old fashioned way.
Iamien Democracy of Klingon Brothers	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:09:00 - [27] Originally by: Madcow What does it matter if the item is moved with you as you say assets you can say you pay aurum for a design and your ship makes it with nanites. And the money wise would have been handiers if you didnt buy it if its for that because then you would have had isk in your wallet and its even easyer to transfer. Come back to the forums after you leave the NPC corp. Yes, I do not believe you to be a forum alt. Even the novice idiots that use forum alts understand what this means to a sandbox game.
Aineko Macx	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:11:00 - [28] They should make it get destroyed AND show on killmails. Reduced vanity item desirability is a good thing. ________________________ CCP: Where fixing bugs is a luxury, not an obligation.
dkbjitawhore	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:12:00 - [29] Edited by: dkbjitawhore on 22/06/2011 11:13:06 Originally by: MBrace It is my understanding that anything purchased with Aurum can be either used or sold, not both. If you use the item you can use it indefinitely but it cannot be sold or un-used. If you buy the Item but do not use it you may transport it at will to be sold anywhere but also destroyed anywhere. It basically works similar to PLEX. Hope that makes sense. Can anyone confirm this first-handedly? if so this is a non-issue. We promise we won't flame you if you speak up as being able to confirm or dis-prove this.
Lucilla Giulia	Posted - 2011.06.22 11:13:00 - [30] Originally by: Merdaneth Originally by: Rex Liberium But...but...the monocle is an implant. So it should be destroyed. The items are so expensive because they provide a duplicate at each station in EVE.... as far as i got nope u leave them behind if you jumpclone, like normal implants, but u don't loose them if u get podded, great isn't it? 'cause if they would follow u form clone to clone....that would imply less $ transactions



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.