Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
175
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 02:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
We all are aware that rmt and bots are in Eve to stay. CCP is unable to get 'em all away from the game even their security team has been gaining some ground. For this reason I throw the forbidden toy to the sandbox and let you guys start chewing...
If player is willing to trust CCP with his creditcard details and let EvE client run on his computer, he should be able to trust CCP enough to let 'em run limited spyware in his computer also. This is my personal opinion and it doesn't weight much, but there goes it anyways...
Would you be ready to run anti-botware to get botless eve? Would it work? Would it fail? Would it be the end of RMT or kill the economy? How do you think the game would change? Is there any alternative solution? What could go wrong? What would be awesome?
Your turn - flood away :) Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off Coalition of the Unfortunate
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 02:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Over my dead body and / or unsubscribed accounts.
I want bots gone as much as the next guy - but like most people I have a large amount of personal content on my computer, plus a lot of work stuff too.
I would never knowingly allow a third party to monitor the goings-on of my personal hardware in any way, shape or form. |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think we should implement a final solution for bad posters with bad ideas. Notify: You are eaten by the Whumpus
http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Stella SGP
The Kimotoro Initiative
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Only if CCP promises not to steal the logins to all my p0rn sites and mess up my "fav" playlist. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
117
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:41:00 -
[5] - Quote
Stormshadow. Admirable suggestion but no. Yes I can trust the company but as we all know, companies are a collection of inidividuals and any individual can go rogue. Our credit card details are protected by international law, our personal information is not covered by all countries equally.
What might be legal (**** sites as the example - lol) in my country would not be legal in say, yours. Where does the law lay? In the land of fhe server or the client?
I have always liked the suggestion of Captcha or similar client checking. A flash in your Neocom says you've got 10 minutes to respond - but only if you're ratting or mining. Punch in the code and you're good to go.
How many people would accept this to help eliminate bots?
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

luZk
Jaegerkorpset
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
If CCP wanted to get rid of the botters i would be easy. But they wont.
I suggest.
Make a "I am human" test appear at every bounty payout with a simple math problem. Something like 3+5+2+7 = (?) and a 10 min. timer to give an answer. If you fail the test your client logs off auto. If you keep logging in and failing the test a GM gets a message about it. |

Mara Tessidar
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
Captchas. Captchas.
Not sure if trolling, or just really stupid. Notify: You are eaten by the Whumpus
http://goo.gl/uX5vk |

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
actually a captcha cleverly implemented at ANY docking phase of the game would be a great way to kill botting
click on doc stupid lil block comes up confirming docking coordinates human has to type in the correct answer to the captcha puzzle.
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released HYDRA RELOADED
71
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sri Nova wrote:actually a captcha cleverly implemented at ANY docking phase of the game would be a great way to kill botting
click on doc stupid lil block comes up confirming docking coordinates human has to type in the correct answer to the captcha puzzle.
Speaking of stupid, that is some extraordinary stupid suggestion.
GÖ½ When your ship gets blown to bits GÖ½ And you lose your Faction fits \Gÿ+/ Don't worry GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ½ GÖ¬ GÖ½ GÖ¬ Be Happy \Gÿ+/ |

luZk
Jaegerkorpset
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:Captchas. Captchas.
Not sure if trolling, or just really stupid.
I guess im really stupid then. 
Well the problem with todays test its based on 1 picture, if its Captchas or reCaptchas or "re-re-re-re-re-reCaptchas", i dont really care.
Say it was a 10-20 sec. randomized .gif with numbers appearing and disappearing or numbers moving from visible to invisible on ponies riding across your screen. Perhaps a colour code could define the order, if blue then, if red then, if yellow ect.
Can we at least agree it would be harder to bot than it is today right?
Its a ungoing fight no matter what, what works tomorrow will not work in 3-6 months. But its still better than giving up on fixing the problem. |

suki cox
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:Captchas. Captchas.
Not sure if trolling, or just really stupid.
Not sure if bot farmer, who hasnt cracked captchas |

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
luZk wrote:If CCP wanted to get rid of the botters i would be easy. But they wont.
This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
97
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Would you be ready to run anti-botware to get botless eve? Would it work? Would it fail? Would it be the end of RMT or kill the economy? How do you think the game would change? Is there any alternative solution? What could go wrong? What would be awesome?
Software security 101:
Do not trust the client. This means that regardless of how careful you are with writing your software, do not expect it to work as you designed it when it runs on hardware that you do not have in your physical possession.
Software like Punkbuster only works as long as the potential offenders aren't smart enough to use a fake Punkbuster to send fake "client is clean" messages back to the server. Any encryption performed by software on the client means that by definition the encryption keys must be on the client, which means they can be copied and used to encrypt fake "client is clean" messages.
You cannot trust the client.
So certainly, all the innocent players will happily run your Punkbuster and put up with the errors that it introduces. In the meantime the bot users will install the fake Punkbuster which reports the "good" values, even though there are a dozen bots running on that computer.
If the problem of reliably detecting bots was really as easy as you believe it is, there would be no bots.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
97
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
luZk wrote:Can we at least agree it would be harder to bot than it is today right?
Sure. It would also be harder to play legitimately.
Any mechanism to "fight bots" that causes difficulty for legitimate players is not acceptable. If I'm trying to jump through a gate to escape pursuers, why should I be forced to respond to a CAPTCHA?
Then there's the issue of outsourcing CAPTCHA solving to Mechanical Turk or hordes of $1/week Chinese prisoners.
To which point, is there a game-ethics difference between running a bot versus having a dozen Chinese prisoners playing your character for you 23x7?
|

luZk
Jaegerkorpset
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Good point Mara Rinn. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
Quote:This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. Forgive my ignorance, can you please explain to me how you would stop such actions if you were CCP? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
345
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:09:00 -
[17] - Quote
Embarrased laughter : Final solution ? Snerk...
Authoritative statement : Every anti-bot measure that requires user interaction will end up causing more trouble than it's worth for legitimate users compared to the effectiveness against actual bots.
Mild sarcasm : As for anti-bot software addons... yes, great idea, have people responsible for boot.ini and several other lesser incidents gain access to code closer to the core of your OS, that will end well. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
66
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
Players run bots and buy ISK illegally. The final fix is to remove the players, but the result is well no game.
But you know, CCP finds Bots as they can and that time and work cost money that could go into game development. Everyone says it is CCP job to police their game. Well they do, but if the player base wasn't filled with so many ......... then CCP would have more money and time to spend on other projects.
So kick your botting friend in the head, and tell him/her to knock it off.
Capitals (Balancing and Roles) |

luZk
Jaegerkorpset
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:15:00 -
[19] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Embarrased laughter : Final solution ? Snerk...
Authoritative statement : Every anti-bot measure that requires user interaction will end up causing more trouble than it's worth for legitimate users compared to the effectiveness against actual bots.
Mild sarcasm : As for anti-bot software addons... yes, great idea, have people responsible for boot.ini and several other lesser incidents gain access to code closer to the core of your OS, that will end well.
Stop talking like HK-47.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg1gTas7OAA
|

Kimli
The Directive
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:19:00 -
[20] - Quote
Simetraz wrote:Players run bots and buy ISK illegally. The final fix is to remove the players, but the result is well no game.
But you know, CCP finds Bots as they can and that time and work cost money that could go into game development. Everyone says it is CCP job to police their game. Well they do, but if the player base wasn't filled with so many ......... then CCP would have more money and time to spend on other projects.
So kick your botting friend in the head, and tell him/her to knock it off.
this ^^ |

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
346
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
luZk wrote:Stop talking like HK-47.  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=15557&find=unread Excited commentary : An ELCOR HK-47 !
http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Contributor_name:Akita_T#Contributions_link_collection |

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Quote:This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. Forgive my ignorance, can you please explain to me how you would stop such actions if you were CCP?
Your ignorance is not my problem.
This is internets forumz and no one is paying me to educate you.
Imagination is the only limitation to the amount of information and statistics available to them. If you can't figure out how the one group who owns and controls the server-side coding/operation of the game might be able to identify systematic botting, there is no hope for you.... and there will most certainly be no forgiveness for your idiocy.
This doesn't even mention the gains to be made with a small amount of resources dedicated to sting operations they could set up to nail popular sellers. The very idea you could hide/launder money through however many characters/actions from the one group of persons which no action is ultimately hidden from is an exercise in stupidity.
Forgive my brutal logic. Can you please explain to me how you are so dumb? |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
WOW has a piece of software that runs in the background, starts and stops randomly while ur running the wow client, if it detects bot software GM's are notified.
guess what, i played wow for 6 months with 3 friends. together we saw 3 bots in total.
i approve of anti bot software. as long as it only runs while client is active and doesnt take the resources of incarna because i would hate for my PC to catch fire while on login screen
|

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:The Apostle wrote:Quote:This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. Forgive my ignorance, can you please explain to me how you would stop such actions if you were CCP? Your ignorance is not my problem. This is internets forumz and no one is paying me to educate you. Imagination is the only limitation to the amount of information and statistics available to them. If you can't figure out how the one group who owns and controls the server-side coding/operation of the game might be able to identify systematic botting, there is no hope for you.... and there will most certainly be no forgiveness for your idiocy. Forgive my brutal logic. Can you please explain to me how you are so dumb? Lolz. man, you're a card.
So I can run 3 Tengu accounts. I run each for 4 or 5 hours at a time. If a neut comes into system I safe up. I do this 7 days a week. Am I a bot or a human?
I run 3 Hulks on 3 screens. I mine 5 hours a day and I do it 7 days straight. After 5 hours, I log my other 3 Hulks and mine the same. While all my Hulks are mining away I'm doing my work at my desk. Am I a bot or human?
I run a Domi and I do L4's all day every day. After 5 hours, I log my other Domi char and do the same. Am I a bot or human?
Don't bother answering. You can't tell can you? If you think patterns are a way to detect botting. Well. Cough......
Only way I have EVER seen bots identified beyond doubt is by interacting with them. Their response is the giveaway, not the botting patterns themselves.
Oh and RMT. As fast as a sting nailed an RMT'er, he's moved, shut down his accounts and started somewhere else. And apart from a breach of EULA, what law has he broken? You cannot enlist the help of the RMT ISP's/law enforcment or any such agency. So how do you stop them?
To declare that CCP could "easily" stop RMT/Botting is about.... well..... as dumb as it can get. Sorry man. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:The Apostle wrote:Quote:This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. Forgive my ignorance, can you please explain to me how you would stop such actions if you were CCP? Your ignorance is not my problem. This is internets forumz and no one is paying me to educate you. Imagination is the only limitation to the amount of information and statistics available to them. If you can't figure out how the one group who owns and controls the server-side coding/operation of the game might be able to identify systematic botting, there is no hope for you.... and there will most certainly be no forgiveness for your idiocy. Forgive my brutal logic. Can you please explain to me how you are so dumb? Lolz. man, you're a card. So I can run 3 Tengu accounts. I run each for 4 or 5 hours at a time. If a neut comes into system I safe up. I do this 7 days a week. Am I a bot or a human? I run 3 Hulks on 3 screens. I mine 5 hours a day and I do it 7 days straight. After 5 hours, I log my other 3 Hulks and mine the same. While all my Hulks are mining away I'm doing my work at my desk. Am I a bot or human? I run a Domi and I do L4's all day every day. After 5 hours, I log my other Domi char and do the same. Am I a bot or human? Don't bother answering. You can't tell can you? If you think patterns are a way to detect botting. Well. Cough...... Only way I have EVER seen bots identified beyond doubt is by interacting with them. Their response is the giveaway, not the botting patterns themselves. Oh and RMT. As fast as a sting nailed an RMT'er, he's moved, shut down his accounts and started somewhere else. And apart from a breach of EULA, what law has he broken? You cannot enlist the help of the RMT ISP's/law enforcment or any such agency. So how do you stop them? To declare that CCP could "easily" stop RMT/Botting is about.... well..... as dumb as it can get. Sorry man.
It's not what you are flying and your behaviors as viewed by a human observer, it's the statistics of those behaviors as viewed by a machine that will give away a human vs a machine. Human interaction ala conversation or otherwise is not only unneeded, it's not nearly as efficient or accurate. Reaction times, statistics of those across multiple encounters, things like that. Cold hard numbers separate machines from humans, nothing else is needed or even wanted.(I want them to KNOW I'm a bot when they ban me, not *think* I'm a bot)
Not to mention the false/bogus information that could be fed to a client to illicit reactions of a bot where a human might only perceive a glitch.
The fact that you cannot think of ways CCP could easily attack RMT only proves the limitation of your imagination, nothing more. Another display of the ignorance you asked forgiveness for earlier.
and wtf law enforcement? What are you on about?
edit: but again this is all an exercise in futility. as I've already explained CCP doesn't want to eliminate RMT in Eve. It would be suicide, especially at a time when they need every subscription they can get. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:31:00 -
[26] - Quote
Quote:The fact that you cannot think of ways CCP could easily attack RMT only proves the limitation of your imagination, nothing more. Another display of the ignorance you asked forgiveness for earlier.
and wtf law enforcement? What are you on about? You are the one telling me how easy it is. So say so instead of beating the bushes with such belligerent nonsense!
As for law enforcement, CCP cannot use law enforcement/such agencies to shut down RMT. (right, got that bit?)
So CCP has to do the job - alone. (got that bit?)
This is just one scenario. Set up sting. Catch character X. He gets banned. But not before he accidently got "blowed up" by character Y with 200 plex in his hold. Character Y is also character X etc... Rince and repeat.
Second Scenario The RMT transaction is setup outside of any Eve jurisiction. Easily done, can't be traced to any account (ebay, direct debit, paypal etc.) You can then rinse ISK through Eve with BPO/C scams, "buy 1 trit" scams etc. etc.... You simply cannot monitor the millions of transactions that occur everyday and deduce that transaction 432,564 is an RMT transfer.
Third Scenario Go to System Y, Moon 9 - warp to 70. I forgot to put my shuttle away with that 1.6b ISK BPO inside it. Gosh darn.....
There ya go. Imaginitive ways to avoid RMT. Is that what you asked for? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
luZk wrote:If CCP wanted to get rid of the botters i would be easy. But they wont.
I suggest.
Make a "I am human" test appear at every bounty payout with a simple math problem. Something like 3+5+2+7 = (?) and a 10 min. timer to give an answer. If you fail the test your client logs off auto. If you keep logging in and failing the test a GM gets a message about it.
BECAUSE IT'S AN IMPOSSIBLE FOR A COMPUTER TO DO MATH |

Prince Kobol
47
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
The problem in detecting bots is that every players is different.
We each have our own way of playing.
You can not tell 100% whether somebody is a bot or not just by watching them play.
The only 100% method I know of detecting a bot is if you destroy the ship but the pod carries on regardless.
Getting rid of bots is not easy because if it was there would be no bots.. duh.
What makes life difficult for CCP is PLEX and the ability to purchase characters.
It allows a person to create account after account without having to submit any personal information and then to purchase a character capable of ratting / botting immediately.
I am unaware of any other MMO where this is true.
A quick example.
RMT sites purchases Eve time codes using stolen credit details.
RMT agents creates a new account and uses those eve time codes to active account and redeem PLEX.
Multiple Players purchase PLEX from RMT site.
RMT agent gives those PLEX (at below the market rate) instead of isk to those players in game
Players think they are getting a good deal as they actually get more isk when selling those PLEX's then they would of taking the isk.
Once Agent has sold all the PLEX he can then ditch the account and start again.
|

mechtech
SRS Industries SRS.
26
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 07:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
I'd love a 3rd party "warden" type program.
I already being data mined by Gmail, Google, and Skype, and the NSA already has backdoors into my isp. Would I also allow some video game vikings to look for eve botting tools loaded into my memory? Sure :P
You can't ever kill botting, but you can make it harder, and increase the barrier of entry. I'd absolutely love to see an anti-bot module as a core component of the CARBON toolbox. |

Qupid Stunt
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 07:55:00 -
[30] - Quote
The last time someone came up with
The Final Solution...
It also turned out to be a bad idea |

Tuggboat
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 08:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sony does this, They have had music that infects your computer with rootkits requiring system wipe to remove. I think they have it in their DVD players too. SONY DVD wont play in my Sony DVD player.
Yes this is a great solution, Please ;) divert CCP development into designing AV type software that recognizes suspicious signatures and chews up processor cycles with fake reports. |

Florestan Bronstein
United Engineering Services
67
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 09:01:00 -
[32] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote: Would you be ready to run anti-botware to get botless eve? Would it work? Would it fail? Would it be the end of RMT or kill the economy? How do you think the game would change? Is there any alternative solution? What could go wrong? What would be awesome?
Your turn - flood away :)
no no yes neither, the professionals would just continue botting & RMTing less "casual" botting, more grinding yes PR disaster, lost subscriptions ponies would be awesome |

Tivookz
Long Dong Corp Intergalactic Exports Group
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 09:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
I don't get why so many people are against it.
If you have nothing to hide and you are a legitimate player, why be against it?
In my country the government gave rights to the police to record and store all phonecalls, mail and text messages to make it easier to counter terrorism and crime.
Lots of people were against that too but again, if it makes my legitimate life in my country safer then I'm all for it.
If isk farmers, market warrior bots, mining bots and such could dissapear almost instantly then hell yes, implement it.
Lets face it, it would most likely force almost everyone who is an afk botter to stop botting.
Only the most hardcore iskfarmers out there who actually have real people monitoring the bots 24/7 would have a chance of survival. |

TriadSte
Thr33lance Incorp
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 09:54:00 -
[34] - Quote
Only the people who use such things as RMT and bots would be against this.
The legit people would not mind any CCP software running to see out the bots.
I mean all that's needed to catch bots is a software to track time between keypresses? If char 1-2-3 etc has the same time frame of warping to station for example, its a bot and they get auto banned.
|

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off Coalition of the Unfortunate
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 10:00:00 -
[35] - Quote
Tivookz wrote:If you have nothing to hide and you are a legitimate player, why be against it?
Because software like this by its very nature has to monitor every process to be able to operate effectively.
I honestly don't care if CCP wants to assign a guy to watch a screen that shows everything my character does as I have nothing to hide so far as EvE is concerned.
That good will does not, however, extend to monitoring all of the actions of of my machine in case they happen to touch the EvE process. I consider the goings on of my personal hardware a strictly private affair and any form of anti-cheat spyware that monitors all active processes is the start of a slippery slope. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
125
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 10:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
Quote:In my country the government gave rights to the police to record and store all phonecalls, mail and text messages to make it easier to counter terrorism and crime.
Lots of people were against that too but again, if it makes my legitimate life in my country safer then I'm all for it.
I used to think like this too until our country put a bloke in jail for 60 something days on suspicion of aiding and abetting terrorists when all the guy did was use a phone that once belonged to a bloke that knew a guy who had a friend that used the phone.
He was never charged and yet he was still deported, family and all.
And then proven innocent.
Deadly true.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

KaarBaak
45
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:WOW has a piece of software that runs in the background, starts and stops randomly while ur running the wow client, if it detects bot software GM's are notified.
guess what, i played wow for 6 months with 3 friends. together we saw 3 bots in total.
i approve of anti bot software. as long as it only runs while client is active and doesnt take the resources of incarna because i would hate for my PC to catch fire while on login screen
Obviously the spy software they install on peoples' computer works. 
Quote:If you have nothing to hide and you are a legitimate player, why be against it?
Quote:Only the people who use such things as RMT and bots would be against this.
Statements like these are at least concerning...at their worst they're frightening.
However, they do serve as a reminder that there are people in the world that still have the same mentality that has given legitimacy to police states. I understand it's just a game...but the "if you have nothing to hide" mentality is fundamentally contraventional to personal freedom. There are better, less intrusive ways.
And Google and FB are also just collecting your browsing/computing activities with just your best interests at heart, as well. If you've got nothing to hide... |

Jonah Gravenstein
16
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Definitive answer is no.
I don't agree with corporate entities being able to run, what is at its core, spyware on my machines after so many cockups by so many software vendors that have produced false positives or worse. Sonys rootkit & Blizzards warden being prime examples.
The age old "if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" argument doesn't cut any ice either, would you leave your curtains open at night with the lights on so anyone on the street can see what you're up to in the privacy of your own home? --CATPAIN KIRK wrote: your not black - I've seen you in that video. I meant you write like an american but speak a somewhat difrent langauge - a bit like scotish or sumthing.-- |

Abrazzar
135
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:37:00 -
[39] - Quote
I will not install spyware on my computer. Period. Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |

Spurty
V0LTA VOLTA Corp
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:44:00 -
[40] - Quote
Punk buster? VAC?
Both do this, both lag behind a times ---- CONCORD arrested two n00bs yesterday, one was drinking battery acid, the other was eating fireworks. They charged one and let the other one off. |

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
50
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
OP you will find that these people are stupidly, ridiculously... insanely paranoid. CCP does not want your **** sites and illegal torrents people!
After giving it some thought (and after suggesting this very thing about 6 months ago) I have come to the realization that an equally controversial topic may solve botting, as well as AFK cloaking. In terms of botting, the problem is coming from software that is become smarter and smarter. But if local was delayed....
Yea... Delayed local...
Without local, how could bots react? Without local what point would there be in AFK cloakers?
But then the Null bears cry fowl just as loudly when their precious-easy-at-a-glance intel gathering tool comes into question. So they don't want that either. What do they want? I have no idea... this community complains about everything, and so we shall just have more and more bots until eve plays itself.
Soon... all MMORPG's will have to confront (and fix) this problem, or their businesses will suffer. |

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
42
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
It hasn't worked for any of the other games (o/ WoW) that has implemented such nonsense, so what makes you think big-brother software would yield a different result in Eve?
Develop a culture of snitching by making people understand that botting hurts Eve and hold people accountable .. the only (read: surest) way of doing it. Taking the 5th or feigning ignorance should never be allowed as defence since we all signed on the dotted line and thus agreed to report any EULA violations we come across.
I for one will never install snooping software of any kind (except to keep track of my multiple personalities) and abhor the idea of burning RAM no matter how little on something that has zero proven effect. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
98
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 12:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
TriadSte wrote:Only the people who use such things as RMT and bots would be against this.
Logical fallacy: "If you are not with us, you are against us!"
TriadSte wrote:The legit people would not mind any CCP software running to see out the bots.
Moral fallacy: "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."
I do have things to hide from CCP, specifically my bank account details, my Tax File Number, pass phrases for various services I administer, various documents covered by secrecy agreements that CCP is not party to. I have secrets and having those secrets does not make me an evil person. While I might trust CCP to do the right thing by me, there is no guarantee that CCP won't get bought out by someone I don't trust (such as SOE), and there is no guarantee that their supervisor program won't get hacked.
TriadSte wrote:I mean all that's needed to catch bots is a software to track time between keypresses? If char 1-2-3 etc has the same time frame of warping to station for example, its a bot and they get auto banned.
The EVE client is "dumb". All those key presses are fed back to the server. A study on bots in Ragnarok Online found that messages sent from bots had very discrete periodicity while messages sent from human controlled clients had uniform periodicity between commands. That is to say, the timing analysis you are suggesting could easily be done server-side on EVE Online just as it was done for Ragnarok Online. There is no need for any software to be added to my computer to monitor my key presses.
In addition, there is no way for CCP to trust any software running on my computer. I could write my own software which pretends to be their supervisor program and simply feeds back to CCP whatever information they expect their supervisor program to send back if I was a "legitimate" player. |

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
:contemplative mood
This is an interesting topic. I have not yet formulated my opinion, but I will say that I do not use my computer for anthing that I would not do or say in public, well except mast******** and and CCP would not be able to see that 
Slade
|

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:
I do have things to hide from CCP, specifically my bank account details, my Tax File Number, pass phrases for various services I administer, various documents covered by secrecy agreements that CCP is not party to. I have secrets and having those secrets does not make me an evil person. While I might trust CCP to do the right thing by me, there is no guarantee that CCP won't get bought out by someone I don't trust (such as SOE), and there is no guarantee that their supervisor program won't get hacked.
That is why I use a seperate computer for all of my 'sensitive stuff.'
Slade |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:11:00 -
[46] - Quote
No, I wouldn't want CCP spyware on my computer. It would likely wardec all the other spyware already there.
A kind of captcha could theoretically work, but if all it does is log you off, you will be smart enough to have built automated re-log routine.
In AION if I remember right, they have that little keypad pop up. Numbers are placed on it randomly and screen position varies, too. It activates when you have farmed a lot in a very short time. Asks you for 4 or so numbers. And I think it does not log you off. It just freezes your toon until you put in the number. Not sure anymore. I'd think even that is not totally save and just works against farm bots.
Pattern recognition will also not work. Sophisticated bots are programmed to put slight variations into their behaviour, trying to appear more human.
Lastly: The argument "only the guilty would not agree blah blah..." is BS.
I know one of the so-called "Cyberpolice" guys in my own country. He is an annoying little fat man who enjoys dirty jokes.
I certainly would not want such a guy listening to my private phone talks, read any SMS or mails I exchange with girls or anyone else or even know what TV program I'm watching. Thanks God so far all he is allowed to do is chasing the Internet for child P and such. A rather mediocre man put to a good use, one could say.
And I no longer live in my country of birth. Phew! :) |

KaarBaak
45
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:13:00 -
[47] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote: Taking the 5th or feigning ignorance should never be allowed as defence since we all signed on the dotted line and thus agreed to report any EULA violations we come across.
Can you link that portion of the EULA/ToS please, because I cannot find it and think it would be pertinent to this discussion.
|

malaire
71
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:17:00 -
[48] - Quote
Just installing CCP spyware is not solution since it can't detect LEGO robot pressing buttons on your computer.
What is needed, is for EVE to require webcam so that CCP spyware can contianually check that there is player (not robot, not your cat) present when client detects button-presses or mouse movement. As a bonus CCP can add facial detection to also detect account sharing.
Carebear -á* -áTrader -á* -áPerfect Music-á-á* -áNever Scamming -á* -áNever Pirating |

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote: In addition, there is no way for CCP to trust any software running on my computer. I could write my own software which pretends to be their supervisor program and simply feeds back to CCP whatever information they expect their supervisor program to send back if I was a "legitimate" player.
Actually, CCP don't even know if it's their client (or supervisor) program that is connected to their server.
It could very well be a proxy that washes/alters any unwanted data from the stream.
|

Eternum Praetorian
PWNED Factor The Seventh Day
51
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 13:39:00 -
[50] - Quote
malaire wrote:Just installing CCP spyware is not solution since it can't detect LEGO robot pressing buttons on your computer.
What is needed, is for EVE to require webcam so that CCP spyware can continually check that there is player (not robot, not your cat) present when client detects button-presses or mouse movement. As a bonus CCP can add facial detection to also detect account sharing.
Here is hoping that you're joking/trolling Because if not, your stupidity astounds the rest of us  |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
176
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 14:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
malaire wrote:Just installing CCP spyware is not solution since it can't detect LEGO robot pressing buttons on your computer.
What is needed, is for EVE to require webcam so that CCP spyware can continually check that there is player (not robot, not your cat) present when client detects button-presses or mouse movement. As a bonus CCP can add facial detection to also detect account sharing. Now this is what high quality troll post looks like :) Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Imuran
Zentor Industries
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 16:50:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sri Nova wrote:actually a captcha cleverly implemented at ANY docking phase of the game would be a great way to kill botting
click on doc stupid lil block comes up confirming docking coordinates human has to type in the correct answer to the captcha puzzle.
and that would take me out of the game permanently - I have severe problems deciphering a lot of captchas on forums these days - let alone the inconvenicence of it all |

Zagam
Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
123
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 17:07:00 -
[53] - Quote
If CCP instituted limited spyware, they would lose a VERY large chunk of their playerbase. Many EVE players are pretty knowledgeable about computers, and routinely check my computer for spyware and such. Largely because I don't trust anything labled "SPYware" to protect my privacy.
Beyond that... I'm sure botters could disable the spyware, or learn how to evade it.
IMO, the best way to find a botter is to track the movement of their ISK, and also track their online time. If they are on 23/7 consistently, doing the same thing... they are either sharing accounts (against the EULA) or botting (also against the EULA). And... if they have a large sum of money going to certain characters on a regular basis - smells like a potential RMT operation. |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
176
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 17:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Imuran wrote:Sri Nova wrote:actually a captcha cleverly implemented at ANY docking phase of the game would be a great way to kill botting
click on doc stupid lil block comes up confirming docking coordinates human has to type in the correct answer to the captcha puzzle.
and that would take me out of the game permanently - I have severe problems deciphering a lot of captchas on forums these days - let alone the inconvenicence of it all
Yep... and ratting bots could as well refill ammo and drop loot to pos. Mechanics related to docking would not prevent this.
I think captchas has been discussed more than enough in some of the previous botting topics already. The general feedback has always resulted to common feedback about them being great annoyance to player but unefficient against the bots. It is safe to say that captcha-related solutions would not work in eve.
Some people have been very worried about anti-botting spyware nosing their "secrets". However anti botting spyware could be as simple as external process which is running while Eve is running and is monitoring that certain programs are NOT running in the computer at that same time.
Any protective measure can be passed, but protective measures can be upgraded when this happens. If anti-botware would not stop botting (and other questionable programs) entirely, it would at least keep them offline for great period of the year.
Running anti-bot spyware is many times safer than running bot software which is spying.
Running anti-virus, anti-adware, anti-spyware is pretty much same than running anti-botware. Most of you have at least one of the 3 in your computer already.
Anti-botware can be hacked? Yes... so can eve client or your internet browser.
Removing botting (or some of the botters) would not stop RMT? Perhaps not. It still would make harder for them to get iskies to sell.
Removing botting would push more people to buy isk from RMT market? Perhaps or perhaps they would use the legal way and buy plex.
There... some of my thoughts about the issues mentioned in replies so far. Discussion has been very constructive so far - keep it going :) Thanks for all the replies. Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |

Alundil
The Unnamed. Novum Militis ExParte
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 17:25:00 -
[55] - Quote
I know I am quoting myself but only because I think that this idea would be very neat if implemented and would also give a potential boost to exploration (find old botter's stuff) and lore (here lies dead botters)
Alundil wrote:Just a thought in regards to the Botting/Macroing/RMT-ing people caught in Sreegs' devious net of devious catching.
I thought it would be a great idea if there might be a special place in New Eden for those toons/accounts caught exploiting or botting/macroing/RMT-ing by the Devs.
There's an oft quoted and cliched saying along the lines of "There's a special place in Hell for..."
1. It of course relies on CCP's willingness to seriously address the problem (insert EVE meme at your leisure). I am not necessarily saying that they do not - there just doesn't appear to be much in the way of meaningful "Perp-Walk"
2. Once the offending toon/character/account is detected the following actions happen:
a. Their accounts are immediately frozen and disabled b. Their EVE-worldy possessions (from all toons on the account) are ejected in a special super large "Jet Can" in a random system in space (w- or k-). These containers would be scannable/probable using Deep Space probes and would offer a real neat surprise to the player(s) that located them. c. The ship hulls in their possession (from all toons on the account) are transported to a remote beacon in the system they were located in. d. This beacon would be called something along the lines of "Sreegs' revenge" or some other Lore - Appropriate name e. These transported hulls would be derelict wrecks and un-salvageable. They would retain the names of the Toon caught and expelled for violating the TOS in the manner described above (botting, etc)
This would, effectively, be an EVE ship graveyard populated by some of the most despicable characters in New Eden.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=14820 |

stoicfaux
250
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 18:09:00 -
[56] - Quote
exasperation: Due to reasons mentioned previously, solving the botting problem is impractical/impossible. The only way to *truly* prevent botting is to eliminate the "need" or desire to bot. Meaning, if you eliminate the problem, then there's no need to find a solution to the problem.[1]
lecturing: Putting strip miners on a freighter, applying a PI paradigm to mining (i.e "automated" mining,) or replacing NPC bounties with PC bounties (miner pays you X isk to keep clear this belt clear of rats) are (not necessarily good) examples of removing or reducing the "need" or "desire" to bot.
[1] clarifying to prevent incredulity: For example, solving world hunger and world peace are hard problems. However, if you nerve gas the planet then there's no longer a need to find solutions to world hunger and world peace. |

Minabunny
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 18:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
Would never happen and the 'spyware' would be bypassed just like it is in other games that have gone this route. |

N1gella Laws0n
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 18:58:00 -
[58] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:We all are aware that rmt and bots are in Eve to stay. CCP is unwilling
fyp.
They don't even autoflag people that run 23/7. They're not even trying.
|

Sebero Sinak
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 19:36:00 -
[59] - Quote
+1 to you and the spyware idea...if you trust em with your other info , some CCP spyware is worth the price to cut down on botting.
Probably the biggest whiners you will see against the idea are the bot users. |

Jita Alt666
284
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 19:53:00 -
[60] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Pr1ncess Alia wrote:The Apostle wrote:Quote:This x100000
CCP permits botting for a reason.
Any claims and so-called efforts to the contrary are to keep the greater player-base collective panties unbunched.
RMT controls most of 0.0. CCP not only knows this, they factor it into their business model. Forgive my ignorance, can you please explain to me how you would stop such actions if you were CCP? Your ignorance is not my problem. This is internets forumz and no one is paying me to educate you. Imagination is the only limitation to the amount of information and statistics available to them. If you can't figure out how the one group who owns and controls the server-side coding/operation of the game might be able to identify systematic botting, there is no hope for you.... and there will most certainly be no forgiveness for your idiocy. Forgive my brutal logic. Can you please explain to me how you are so dumb? Lolz. man, you're a card. So I can run 3 Tengu accounts. I run each for 4 or 5 hours at a time. If a neut comes into system I safe up. I do this 7 days a week. Am I a bot or a human? I run 3 Hulks on 3 screens. I mine 5 hours a day and I do it 7 days straight. After 5 hours, I log my other 3 Hulks and mine the same. While all my Hulks are mining away I'm doing my work at my desk. Am I a bot or human? I run a Domi and I do L4's all day every day. After 5 hours, I log my other Domi char and do the same. Am I a bot or human? Don't bother answering. You can't tell can you? If you think patterns are a way to detect botting. Well. Cough...... Only way I have EVER seen bots identified beyond doubt is by interacting with them. Their response is the giveaway, not the botting patterns themselves. Oh and RMT. As fast as a sting nailed an RMT'er, he's moved, shut down his accounts and started somewhere else. And apart from a breach of EULA, what law has he broken? You cannot enlist the help of the RMT ISP's/law enforcment or any such agency. So how do you stop them? To declare that CCP could "easily" stop RMT/Botting is about.... well..... as dumb as it can get. Sorry man.
Your over simplification is ridiculous. Patterns in details show bot vs human very quickly. If CCP's were detailed enough...
|

Jita Alt666
284
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 20:09:00 -
[61] - Quote
My random crazy idea: Build the code for an AI NPC over ride that can be used by GMs. When a player is reported as potentially being a bot, that player is tagged and when that player logs on next (or randomly), a GM is notified with the system location, what ship the player/bot is using. The GM can then watch the player in local and see what actions the player/bot is taking. When the GM is ready, he/she can take control of NPCs in that system (or more specifically the belt/anomaly the player/bot is in) and mix things up a little. Switch targets, Utilise normally unused forms of ecm. etc. |

Mistress Motion
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 20:28:00 -
[62] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:TriadSte wrote:I mean all that's needed to catch bots is a software to track time between keypresses? If char 1-2-3 etc has the same time frame of warping to station for example, its a bot and they get auto banned. The EVE client is "dumb". All those key presses are fed back to the server. A study on bots in Ragnarok Online found that messages sent from bots had very discrete periodicity while messages sent from human controlled clients had uniform periodicity between commands. That is to say, the timing analysis you are suggesting could easily be done server-side on EVE Online just as it was done for Ragnarok Online. There is no need for any software to be added to my computer to monitor my key presses.
Ahem...
TimeToNextKeyPress += 150 + rand(x);
I would imagine every bot maker is clever enough to randomize time between keystrokes, as it's really just that simple. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
99
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 21:38:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mistress Motion wrote:TimeToNextKeyPress += 150 + rand(x);
I would imagine every bot maker is clever enough to randomize time between keystrokes, as it's really just that simple.
My argument was that there's no need to run software on the client to analyse the client's behaviour.
Thankyou for providing another argument demonstrating how hard it is to detect bots.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Industrial Complex Cosmic Consortium
99
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 21:52:00 -
[64] - Quote
Slade Trillgon wrote:GǪ I will say that I do not use my computer for anthing that I would not do or say in public GǪ
Slade Trillgon wrote:That is why I use a seperate computer for all of my 'sensitive stuff.'
Do you have sensitive stuff that you wouldn't show in public, or not? I think you're contradicting yourself here.
Bank account details, superannuation funds, silent numbers - there are plenty of things I wouldn't be letting any random stranger see. |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
138
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 23:05:00 -
[65] - Quote
Quote:So I can run 3 Tengu accounts. I run each for 4 or 5 hours at a time. If a neut comes into system I safe up. I do this 7 days a week. Am I a bot or a human?
I run 3 Hulks on 3 screens. I mine 5 hours a day and I do it 7 days straight. After 5 hours, I log my other 3 Hulks and mine the same. While all my Hulks are mining away I'm doing my work at my desk. Am I a bot or human?
I run a Domi and I do L4's all day every day. After 5 hours, I log my other Domi char and do the same. Am I a bot or human?
Don't bother answering. You can't tell can you? If you think patterns are a way to detect botting. Well. Cough......
Only way I have EVER seen bots identified beyond doubt is by interacting with them. Their response is the giveaway, not the botting patterns themselves.
Oh and RMT. As fast as a sting nailed an RMT'er, he's moved, shut down his accounts and started somewhere else. And apart from a breach of EULA, what law has he broken? You cannot enlist the help of the RMT ISP's/law enforcment or any such agency. So how do you stop them?
To declare that CCP could "easily" stop RMT/Botting is about.... well..... as dumb as it can get. Sorry man.
Quote:Your over simplification is ridiculous. Patterns in details show bot vs human very quickly. If CCP's were detailed enough...
My point here is that ANY of these could be bots OR human players. Despite what you thing, it cannot be detected without massive amounts of stats - over time - to locate any patterns that might exist
And as posted above, which was my next point, injecting randomness to break patterning in code is soooo easy to implement it's not funny. Notwithstanding that a player can also choose to have day off here and there and log earlier on odd days to randomise it even more.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

Pr1ncess Alia
Perkone Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 23:44:00 -
[66] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Quote:So I can run 3 Tengu accounts. I run each for 4 or 5 hours at a time. If a neut comes into system I safe up. I do this 7 days a week. Am I a bot or a human?
I run 3 Hulks on 3 screens. I mine 5 hours a day and I do it 7 days straight. After 5 hours, I log my other 3 Hulks and mine the same. While all my Hulks are mining away I'm doing my work at my desk. Am I a bot or human?
I run a Domi and I do L4's all day every day. After 5 hours, I log my other Domi char and do the same. Am I a bot or human?
Don't bother answering. You can't tell can you? If you think patterns are a way to detect botting. Well. Cough......
Only way I have EVER seen bots identified beyond doubt is by interacting with them. Their response is the giveaway, not the botting patterns themselves.
Oh and RMT. As fast as a sting nailed an RMT'er, he's moved, shut down his accounts and started somewhere else. And apart from a breach of EULA, what law has he broken? You cannot enlist the help of the RMT ISP's/law enforcment or any such agency. So how do you stop them?
To declare that CCP could "easily" stop RMT/Botting is about.... well..... as dumb as it can get. Sorry man. Quote:Your over simplification is ridiculous. Patterns in details show bot vs human very quickly. If CCP's were detailed enough... My point here is that ANY of these could be bots OR human players. Despite what you thing, it cannot be detected without massive amounts of stats - over time - to locate any patterns that might exist And as posted above, which was my next point, injecting randomness to break patterning in code is soooo easy to implement it's not funny. Notwithstanding that a player can also choose to have day off here and there and log earlier on odd days to randomise it even more.
So what your saying is it's impossible because it would require
#1-information (that is readily available to CCP) #2- taking the time to organize and analyze that information (OMG not TIME!!!) #3-People might not bot every day (because this is an absolute necessity to identify them amirite?)
...wait. So how does that = impossible again?
It's like your brain is actively working to sabotage your comments. Maybe you have it running in reverse or need to drink a V8? |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn Warped Aggression
44
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 23:47:00 -
[67] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:Over my dead body and / or unsubscribed accounts.
I want bots gone as much as the next guy - but like most people I have a large amount of personal content on my computer, plus a lot of work stuff too.
I would never knowingly allow a third party to monitor the goings-on of my personal hardware in any way, shape or form.
this |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 00:33:00 -
[68] - Quote
Quote: So what your saying is it's impossible because it would require
#1-information (that is readily available to CCP) #2- taking the time to organize and analyze that information (OMG not TIME!!!) #3-People might not bot every day (because this is an absolute necessity to identify them amirite?)
...wait. So how does that = impossible again?
It's like your brain is actively working to sabotage your comments. Maybe you have it running in reverse or need to drink a V8?
The "information" you readily speak so much about can easily be made difficult to interpret. We're at a stage where we can closely mimic human intelligence in a Q&A and you think 50 or so keystrokes per hour can easily be classified into bot or human behaviour? Seriously?
No game, from ANY developer has EVER been able to eliminate bots/RMT trade. To suggest that CCP is unable (or worse) don't even bother is ludicrous in the extreme.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 05:46:00 -
[69] - Quote
Chess has been botted .
The bots have millions of combination of board postions stored in their database. then their is some logic to follow the best path.
How do you prevent botting in chess ? you don't because you would need to break the rules.
How do you prevent botting in Eve ? thankfully eve can be a bit more complicated than chess but unfortunately the mechanics that the bots are exploiting are arguably less complicated . So is the answer, you don't because it would break the rules of eve ?
Or is the answer to implement a mechanic that would make it infinitely more difficult for a bot to function in eve.
No one wants to be bothered with more complexity or extra methods. The truth however, is that something needs to change in eve.
Whether it be the mechanics that the bots are exploiting or a simple mini game that's impossible for bots to solve .
the mini game would be the easiest to implement . but i would personally prefer a mechanics change.
and as for a the third option . several billion dollar companies have utterly failed at keeping bots off of Personal Computers for decades. you honestly think a million dollar budget will achieve more than those companies have ? |

Prince Kobol
47
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 06:17:00 -
[70] - Quote
Unfortunately many people simply do not understand how bots work hence so many posts saying bot are easy to detect.
If bots were so easy to detect then they wouldn't exist in the number that they do, not only in this game but in all MMO's.
Bots are programs written by some very talented and very intelligent programmers, not by some 12 yr old. |

Richard Hammond II
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
54
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 06:23:00 -
[71] - Quote
The Apostle wrote:Stormshadow. Admirable suggestion but no. Yes I can trust the company but as we all know, companies are a collection of inidividuals and any individual can
and have in the past
more to the point, arent there MMOs that run programs like that already? WoW for example. I know there are things inside their software package that trip my malware detecting programs when Ive had it installed in the past They hired actual clothing designers for WiS clothes "no wonder the monocle cost $80, they had to pay royalties" Screw "FiS" its called EVE CCP |

Brooks Puuntai
Nomadic Asylum
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 06:54:00 -
[72] - Quote
If you think you can create a in game system to try and fight bots then you are horribly wrong. Even a CAPTCHA system would fail eventually. Hence why now a days you get captcha thats so difficult most actual humans can't even read it. Removing/delaying local won't work either due to client injection since the information is already sent between server/client, local is just a GUI.
Really what the OP has in mind as far as a punkbuster style spyware is the only way to prevent botting. Also for those who are paranoid about CCP looking through your stuff, your being over paranoid. You honestly think CCP is going to sit there and shift through 300k+ peoples p0rn folders, steal your bank info(which they already have for most people), or steal any other personal info? All those programs do is sniff out processes they try to interact with the client, once this happens it sends a alert to CCP or closes the client. |

Prince Kobol
47
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 07:16:00 -
[73] - Quote
Programs like Warden and Punk Buster do not stop botting.
There are various ways to bypass both of these programs as well as there being many bots which still remain hidden from Warden.
I also found it funny when Symantec started to treat Warden as malware after an update and try to delete it.
|

Thgil Goldcore
PIE Inc.
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 07:21:00 -
[74] - Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warden_(software)
know it was brought up, but its becoming a rather common feature with online games.... |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 07:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
different human-computer interface developed by CCP
You plug your nodes on your head and things will happen. No other interface allowed, token to calrify user as well as brain scan prior to login. |

Renturu
Tribal Spirit Tribal Unity Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 08:06:00 -
[76] - Quote
I agree that there needs to be more stern action against those botting... For instance.... PERMABAN. But, to catch them... that is the trick. My son (11) plays Runescape (you think I'd trust him to convo you guy's... sheesh! - He pisses me off at times, but hey, he's my son)
Back on topic. Runescape (as much nanny control that there is) does have a system where the server will interact and you must reply or you are kicked. Perhaps CCP should impliment this in some way...
Concord flies into a belt (random security checks -High Sec, of course). Starts convo with random miners in belt... no reply, CCP boots you and 30 day ban for first offense (make it serious enough to get the point across for those attempting).
Second offense - Permaban
For low sec... hmmm, that would require something new... perhaps an NPC bounty hunter? IDK. |

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 20:31:00 -
[77] - Quote
Blizzard had a lot of botting problems with Diablo and later with WoW. They use a two-pronged approach.
First off, if they detect a compiler and/or decompiler, they dumb down the bot detection code, so the bot developer cannot accurately determine whether or not the bot will be caught by the production detection code. In this way, the devloper cannot figure out counter-measures for producion bot detection alogrithms becuase bot detection will only run at "full power" if no developer tools are present.
Secondly, they look at actions taken by the bot : server-side DB reads in the form of stuff you shouldn't know, memory writes or over-writes faster than humanly possible. Also, the bot detection code does checksums against the client and somehow has methods to detect when the correct checksum is being faked. And when they think they found a bot, a GM randomly PM's the bot/player. They can detect some forms of emulation, so if you are running a virtual machine they can detect an outside environment calling the shots. Some extreme forms of hardware emulation are not detecable but cost in the range of $100K (buy them from HP) and are intended for the engineering lab and/or hardware development team.
Blizzard does more - similar to virus checkers, they keep a list and strings of code samples to identify known bots and test for their presence. So, if you have a bot, then change it's name, or create a variant, they can still find it. I'm positive they do stuff that is a well kept set of secrets.
Blizzard stopped the bots by invading your machine at a virus-checker level. CCP can stop the bots too, but as many have said, they may or may not have the corporate will to do so. Did they already lay off the bot guy they supposedly hired ? If not, what is that guy up to ??? |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |