Why on earth does CCP have to do everything "for the sake of high-sec?"
]

There will never be a high sec CSM member. When someone from high sec runs for CSM, null sec makes fun of them...

~2to5 out-of-goon alts ... well, will be hard to reach this numbers for anyone else.

more eve politics and that there is no representative for high sec. The 15minute aggression timer is a flawed mechanic and has no one to argue this point for the eve players who think so. It's only represented by the gankers. I'm saying that the richest players in eve are allowed to prey on the poorest and newest, and are allowed to set the rules without resistance.

Also "whats good for null and low is good for high sec" is a very funny statement and probably comes from a goon. The few should not be allowed to control the many and the weakest and poorest of eve players should have representation. Instead of being scoffed at when they make their points by the richest and oldest of the community who like a particular part of the game.

People that enjoy high sec and what it has to offer should be allowed to enjoy that part of the game and have representation to say what they would like changed.

Also you say nothing stops you.. well the problem is yah when the few in null sec have thousand man alliances and the isk to have 10 accounts so that they can throw infinite votes at their candidates. Then yah there is a barrier for newer less rich players to get into csm.

Goons make up 1% of the population. Tell us more about how we out vote everyone in highsec.

I think the OP already stated how. Goons with its endless supply of ISK from moon goo and various other income allows one player to finance 10 or more alt accounts.

Ok, then they make up 10% of the population and the question remains the same.

Hmmm... Highsec could use some representation on the CSM, as long as it's the right person for the job.

I'm going through list of csm members and all i see is null sec.. null sec.. null sec.. worm hole.. null sec.. i mean jesus christ the keys to the asylum have been handed to the inmates. what is it 20% of all players live in null and they are 80%of the eve community representation.. ******* awesome ccp. No wonder there is a 15minute aggression timer for a ship getting pointed. Dull sec goons put it there so they can make billions ganking freighters with their bump machariels and 2 day condors points to get aggression. What a joke.

Hmmm... Highsec could use some representation on the CSM, as long as it's the right person for the job.

I'm going through list of csm members and all i see is null sec.. null sec.. null sec.. worm hole.. null sec.. i mean jesus christ the keys to the asylum have been handed to the inmates. what is it 20% of all players live in null and they are 80%of the eve community representation.. ******* awesome ccp. No wonder there is a 15minute aggression timer for a ship getting pointed. Dull sec goons put it there so they can make billions ganking freighters with their bump machariels and 2 day condors points to get aggression. What a joke.

I think the OP already stated how. Goons with its endless supply of ISK from moon goo and various other income allows one player to finance 10 or more alt accounts.

During the elections I was VERY vocal on the forums about this.

High-sec needs to pick a candidate and unite behind him or her. Instead, you guys are so disorganized you split your votes between a dozen candidates. Certain high-sec players even expressed on the forums that they would not support a unified candidate. That's problematic, to say the very least, considering your adversaries in these elections are better organized than most high-sec players could imagine.

So my advice is to establish a high-sec candidate by whatever means necessary and try to get your fellow...erm...players to do likewise. Otherwise, no, there will never be a high-sec CSM representative due to vote-splitting.

My 2 ISK.
[EDIT]
Oh damn. I totally forgot about Issler. Where is she anyway?

LOL
[/EDIT]

Here doing my job... :-)

Issler