Monitor this thread via RSS [?]
 
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Vacuole
Vacuole

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 01:27:00 - [1]

That's right, look at the range bonus for those.

Now look at something like Tatanium sabot (projectile) or Uranium charges (hybrid) and the range modifiers are much lower and tolerable.

I guess the days of the EMP/AM rule is over.


Vacuole
Vacuole
Gallente
The Scope

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 01:27:00 - [2]

That's right, look at the range bonus for those.

Now look at something like Tatanium sabot (projectile) or Uranium charges (hybrid) and the range modifiers are much lower and tolerable.

I guess the days of the EMP/AM rule is over.


Letifer Deus
Letifer Deus

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 01:44:00 - [3]

Now people will actually use the other ammo. Before it was like counter-strike, they kept adding guns but did anyone really use anything but m4, ak, awp, and DE? No...

Edited by: Letifer Deus on 04/07/2003 01:45:45

I am the OG PIIIIIMP
Letifer Deus
Letifer Deus
The Short Bus Squad
The SUdden Death Squad

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 01:44:00 - [4]

Now people will actually use the other ammo. Before it was like counter-strike, they kept adding guns but did anyone really use anything but m4, ak, awp, and DE? No...

Edited by: Letifer Deus on 04/07/2003 01:45:45
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Brought to you by the letter ARRR!"
Vacuole
Vacuole

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 02:02:00 - [5]

Yeah.

I think my post sounded a little negative. I wrote it in haste.

I'm thrilled with the changes. Never could figure out how EMP was such a hard hitter regardless of range.

Vacuole
Vacuole
Gallente
The Scope

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 02:02:00 - [6]

Yeah.

I think my post sounded a little negative. I wrote it in haste.

I'm thrilled with the changes. Never could figure out how EMP was such a hard hitter regardless of range.

Cezanne
Cezanne

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 02:20:00 - [7]

It's definitely an improvement.

Pre-patch: Only one type of ammo made sense, Antimatter in the case of Hybrids.

Post-patch: A range of ammo is failing into the useful range depending upon which guns you are fitting and what role those guns are playing in your tactics; I am guessing that Iridium Thorium Uranium and Plutonium all fall into this category. Is anyone using Iron Lead Tungsten or Antimatter though? If not these could probably do with a bit of un-nerfing to bring them up a bit.

Clearly the ideal situation would be ALL ammo types being useful and used, for different load outs & tactics. The lasest patch took a large step in the right direction. In a week or so CCP should be able to stand back and plan the next one.
Cezanne
Cezanne
Gallente
The Scope

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 02:20:00 - [8]

It's definitely an improvement.

Pre-patch: Only one type of ammo made sense, Antimatter in the case of Hybrids.

Post-patch: A range of ammo is failing into the useful range depending upon which guns you are fitting and what role those guns are playing in your tactics; I am guessing that Iridium Thorium Uranium and Plutonium all fall into this category. Is anyone using Iron Lead Tungsten or Antimatter though? If not these could probably do with a bit of un-nerfing to bring them up a bit.

Clearly the ideal situation would be ALL ammo types being useful and used, for different load outs & tactics. The lasest patch took a large step in the right direction. In a week or so CCP should be able to stand back and plan the next one.
Tnelyos
Tnelyos

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 06:47:00 - [9]

antimatter is still good on the fast tracking turrets. their range is low anyway, so the range penalty doesn't hurt too much.
Tnelyos
Tnelyos

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 06:47:00 - [10]

antimatter is still good on the fast tracking turrets. their range is low anyway, so the range penalty doesn't hurt too much.
Bulk Paint
Bulk Paint

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 10:22:00 - [11]

I'm glad the new changes have gone in. The other ammo types are actually worth considering now, depending on your tactics of course.

Granted there was a short period of time when I was getting my arse handed to me in a bag as suddenly my Antimatter rounds couldn't reach anyone, but I'm getting the hang of it.
------------------------------------------------------------
Bulk Paint
Lost In Space
Bulk Paint
Bulk Paint
Gallente
The Scope

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 10:22:00 - [12]

I'm glad the new changes have gone in. The other ammo types are actually worth considering now, depending on your tactics of course.

Granted there was a short period of time when I was getting my arse handed to me in a bag as suddenly my Antimatter rounds couldn't reach anyone, but I'm getting the hang of it.
------------------------------------------------------------
Bulk Paint
Lost In Space
Erick Thakrar
Erick Thakrar

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 15:13:00 - [13]

Granted the ammo range modifiers needed badly to be implemented and so did the fixing of the various damage modifier stacking bugs with modules and such. But, and this is a big one, it was not necessary to further increase the range modifier on EMP M and it was NOT necessary to so thoroughly nerf the tracking rate and ammo capacity of these guns. Not to mention the ROF as well. Well I can live with a lower ROF, but the tracking rate is the killer. Hell, I might as well switch to small turrets since they still have a decent modifier and the tracking range is much better. Most of the non-artillery projectile weapons are worse than useless. I do more damage with a 250MM Scout artillery than I do with a Dual 180MM Carbine Repeating Cannon. Not necessarily because each hit does more damage on the 250MM Scout, but simply because I hit more often and at longer ranges. This even counts for when going against NPC Pirate Cruisers. That is so wrong on so many levels. Oddly enough it seems that lasers have largely escaped the ridiculous nerfing that Projectile turrets got. My single Heavy Modulated Laser still hits for a round a 100 damage with a Multifrequency crystal at about 10 clicks. And I only have lvl2 Med Energy Turret. Oh and putting an ammo cap of 20 rounds in a gun that has a ROF at about 3 seconds is brain dead. These nerfs were not necessary. You could have balanced them nicely by cutting ammo cap in half, implementing the existing range mods (EMP M with a -50% to range is bull****!) and fixing the damage mods stacking bugs. Everything would have been just fine. But no, you had to break out the Dinosaur Killer and nuke the site from orbit. The only way to be sure, eh?!? CCP needs to make up their mind. Not too long ago, they upped the damage that proj was making cause they weren't doing enough damage and now all of a sudden you nerf them to a point where they suck more than they did before you increased their damage!!!
Make up your DAMN Minds!!!
Ya Hya Chouhada!!!
Erick Thakrar
Erick Thakrar
Minmatar
Sebiestor tribe

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 15:13:00 - [14]

Granted the ammo range modifiers needed badly to be implemented and so did the fixing of the various damage modifier stacking bugs with modules and such. But, and this is a big one, it was not necessary to further increase the range modifier on EMP M and it was NOT necessary to so thoroughly nerf the tracking rate and ammo capacity of these guns. Not to mention the ROF as well. Well I can live with a lower ROF, but the tracking rate is the killer. Hell, I might as well switch to small turrets since they still have a decent modifier and the tracking range is much better. Most of the non-artillery projectile weapons are worse than useless. I do more damage with a 250MM Scout artillery than I do with a Dual 180MM Carbine Repeating Cannon. Not necessarily because each hit does more damage on the 250MM Scout, but simply because I hit more often and at longer ranges. This even counts for when going against NPC Pirate Cruisers. That is so wrong on so many levels. Oddly enough it seems that lasers have largely escaped the ridiculous nerfing that Projectile turrets got. My single Heavy Modulated Laser still hits for a round a 100 damage with a Multifrequency crystal at about 10 clicks. And I only have lvl2 Med Energy Turret. Oh and putting an ammo cap of 20 rounds in a gun that has a ROF at about 3 seconds is brain dead. These nerfs were not necessary. You could have balanced them nicely by cutting ammo cap in half, implementing the existing range mods (EMP M with a -50% to range is bull****!) and fixing the damage mods stacking bugs. Everything would have been just fine. But no, you had to break out the Dinosaur Killer and nuke the site from orbit. The only way to be sure, eh?!? CCP needs to make up their mind. Not too long ago, they upped the damage that proj was making cause they weren't doing enough damage and now all of a sudden you nerf them to a point where they suck more than they did before you increased their damage!!!
Make up your DAMN Minds!!!
Ya Hya Chouhada!!!
Random
Random

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 15:24:00 - [15]

i think the reson lasers are this good is becous now its wery easy to counter them with all the new platings.
Random
Random
Amarr
Rampage Eternal
Ka-Tet

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 15:24:00 - [16]

i think the reson lasers are this good is becous now its wery easy to counter them with all the new platings.



Nekayah
Nekayah

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 18:10:00 - [17]

EMP is still working okay for me. I definitely see a difference in my ammo usage though. And I tend to pull off a cruiser or a few frigates at a time, rather than just blowing through them, but EMP is effective.

I will play with the others again now though, to see what fits my style best.
Nekayah
Nekayah

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 18:10:00 - [18]

EMP is still working okay for me. I definitely see a difference in my ammo usage though. And I tend to pull off a cruiser or a few frigates at a time, rather than just blowing through them, but EMP is effective.

I will play with the others again now though, to see what fits my style best.
Ilyana
Ilyana

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 21:58:00 - [19]

EMP doesn't blow at all...neither does AM for hybrids. Just use it to tackle the right situation. Excellent ammo for short-range combat (for example holding off frigates).

In fact, the ammo range 'penalties' give you even more (tactical) variation. You can switch ammo type and change a long range gun to a medium range gun, and a medium range gun to a short range gun (altho tracking speed might become a problem when 'switching the range' of guns). Gain of ammo switching at the right time can also include higher damage since the high dmg ammo tend to have a higher range penalty.

You have to time the exact moments to switch to other ammo (or weaponry if reloading takes too much time), better suited for the new distance.

I like it a lot, but it really should've been in the game right from the start.


Edited by: Ilyana on 04/07/2003 22:06:21
Ilyana
Ilyana
Brutor tribe

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 21:58:00 - [20]

EMP doesn't blow at all...neither does AM for hybrids. Just use it to tackle the right situation. Excellent ammo for short-range combat (for example holding off frigates).

In fact, the ammo range 'penalties' give you even more (tactical) variation. You can switch ammo type and change a long range gun to a medium range gun, and a medium range gun to a short range gun (altho tracking speed might become a problem when 'switching the range' of guns). Gain of ammo switching at the right time can also include higher damage since the high dmg ammo tend to have a higher range penalty.

You have to time the exact moments to switch to other ammo (or weaponry if reloading takes too much time), better suited for the new distance.

I like it a lot, but it really should've been in the game right from the start.


Edited by: Ilyana on 04/07/2003 22:06:21
Derran
Derran

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 22:08:00 - [21]

Actually, them putting the same range penalty on projectile ammo as the hybrid was damn necessary. I am still not sure why I would want to use hybrids on my Gallentean cruiser (which is supposed to get a bonus to hybrid turret damage). All my medium weapon skills are the same level. The projectiles I used pre-patch on my Thorax were the 650MM and I used phased plasma which was supposed have a 30% range reduction (emp I think was 35%). I am still not sure now why would I want to use a 250MM hybrid (which takes 50 more power grid and consumes almost 20 times more power per shot) that uses antimatter ammo that has a -50% (-60% pre-patch) range penalty and yet only does 2 points more damage than phased plasma which has a smaller range penalty? The balance doesn't seem quite there with range mods in but it is definitely better than before. I still have a 4.4 modifier with the projectiles that use 1 point of energy vs a 3.4 with the railguns that use 19 energy. Maybe I am missing something.

Edited by: Derran on 04/07/2003 22:09:15
Derran
Derran
Minmatar
Khumatari Holdings
Ushra'Khan

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.04 22:08:00 - [22]

Actually, them putting the same range penalty on projectile ammo as the hybrid was damn necessary. I am still not sure why I would want to use hybrids on my Gallentean cruiser (which is supposed to get a bonus to hybrid turret damage). All my medium weapon skills are the same level. The projectiles I used pre-patch on my Thorax were the 650MM and I used phased plasma which was supposed have a 30% range reduction (emp I think was 35%). I am still not sure now why would I want to use a 250MM hybrid (which takes 50 more power grid and consumes almost 20 times more power per shot) that uses antimatter ammo that has a -50% (-60% pre-patch) range penalty and yet only does 2 points more damage than phased plasma which has a smaller range penalty? The balance doesn't seem quite there with range mods in but it is definitely better than before. I still have a 4.4 modifier with the projectiles that use 1 point of energy vs a 3.4 with the railguns that use 19 energy. Maybe I am missing something.

Edited by: Derran on 04/07/2003 22:09:15
Lartfor
Lartfor

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 11:46:00 - [23]

I love the new range modifier system... My favorite ammo for hybrid right now is probably iridiam. Long range and still tolerable dmg.

Also The more powerful ammo will still be used but more in the closer range guns or in a situation where ur guns out range the enemy even with AM ammo. That long range stuff is also helpful like tungsten, 150mm rail guns can hit effectivly out to like 17-19k(with the right ammo)
Lartfor
Lartfor
Gallente
Internet Tough Guys Inc.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 11:46:00 - [24]

I love the new range modifier system... My favorite ammo for hybrid right now is probably iridiam. Long range and still tolerable dmg.

Also The more powerful ammo will still be used but more in the closer range guns or in a situation where ur guns out range the enemy even with AM ammo. That long range stuff is also helpful like tungsten, 150mm rail guns can hit effectivly out to like 17-19k(with the right ammo)
Demosthenes
Demosthenes

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 12:02:00 - [25]

The dreaded nerf patch is upon us! :)

It isn't that bad, as some hybrid ammo actually extends range now. But yes, anti is no longer the only answer to "what is the best ammo?" Thorium, Iridium and others offer more now. What our medium size corp is gonna do with 40k rounds of Anti S I'm not sure....

In general it's too bad that we all do less damage. 'Cept can-spawning, gate-camping PKers. Nerf them dudes.
Demosthenes
Demosthenes

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 12:02:00 - [26]

The dreaded nerf patch is upon us! :)

It isn't that bad, as some hybrid ammo actually extends range now. But yes, anti is no longer the only answer to "what is the best ammo?" Thorium, Iridium and others offer more now. What our medium size corp is gonna do with 40k rounds of Anti S I'm not sure....

In general it's too bad that we all do less damage. 'Cept can-spawning, gate-camping PKers. Nerf them dudes.
Presidio
Presidio

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 13:58:00 - [27]

Hello everyone,
Ok I like that they finally fixed the range modifier, on ammo and crystals, but check this out:
I used to use dual 425mm scout artys and they rocked before the patch. After the patch they rename this weapon, instead of 160 ammo rounds now it only holds 20, they nerfed the tracking by 5 times: used to be 0.03 and now it's 0.006, rate of fire got nerfed too. This gun is so bad now, that small medium modulated energy beams outperform it in every aspect, so I switched to small medium modulated lasers. lol Great job devs, now I have 800 powergrid extra that is not being used. I don't use any ammo, nor capacitor, and I can hit anything close range and med range, sweet, I love this patch !!! not
-

"Passivity is fatal to us. Our goal is to make the enemy passive."
Mao Tse-tung
Presidio
Presidio
Brutor tribe

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 13:58:00 - [28]

Hello everyone,
Ok I like that they finally fixed the range modifier, on ammo and crystals, but check this out:
I used to use dual 425mm scout artys and they rocked before the patch. After the patch they rename this weapon, instead of 160 ammo rounds now it only holds 20, they nerfed the tracking by 5 times: used to be 0.03 and now it's 0.006, rate of fire got nerfed too. This gun is so bad now, that small medium modulated energy beams outperform it in every aspect, so I switched to small medium modulated lasers. lol Great job devs, now I have 800 powergrid extra that is not being used. I don't use any ammo, nor capacitor, and I can hit anything close range and med range, sweet, I love this patch !!! not
-

Orbit
Orbit

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 15:19:00 - [29]

Depending on your skills and equipment, the impact of implementing the distance modifications of ammo doesn't have to be that big of a deal.

For example, before the patch I was using AM medium in 250 Proto Gauss Rails. My Sharpshooter skill was at level 4 (+20%). My optimum range was like 29km or something, plus the falloff of 10km meant I could hit from pretty darn far out.

Now, same weapons, same ammo, same skills, and my optimum is like 14.5km, but the 10km falloff is still there too. As a result, I can hit just fine at around 20km or so, which is more than enough range to be able to fight even a 50k pirate spawn without getting roasted. Less margin for error, yes, but not catastrophic.

As with all things, with the right combination of equipment and skills, many things are possible.

Just food for thought...
Orbit
Orbit
Gallente
Galactex

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 15:19:00 - [30]

Depending on your skills and equipment, the impact of implementing the distance modifications of ammo doesn't have to be that big of a deal.

For example, before the patch I was using AM medium in 250 Proto Gauss Rails. My Sharpshooter skill was at level 4 (+20%). My optimum range was like 29km or something, plus the falloff of 10km meant I could hit from pretty darn far out.

Now, same weapons, same ammo, same skills, and my optimum is like 14.5km, but the 10km falloff is still there too. As a result, I can hit just fine at around 20km or so, which is more than enough range to be able to fight even a 50k pirate spawn without getting roasted. Less margin for error, yes, but not catastrophic.

As with all things, with the right combination of equipment and skills, many things are possible.

Just food for thought...
Ilia Volyova
Ilia Volyova

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 15:20:00 - [31]

- You can use AM still fine in the Blasters, the opt range penalities are not very sever for those.

- I'm using heavy mod Beam and 650 scouts; prepatch the scouts were better than the mods, now the mods are better - but those need energy, too. I'm quite happy with using both. Have fun with using energy weapons alone and run out of cao in a mob...
Ilia Volyova
Ilia Volyova
Minmatar
Avatars of Doom

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2003.07.05 15:20:00 - [32]

- You can use AM still fine in the Blasters, the opt range penalities are not very sever for those.

- I'm using heavy mod Beam and 650 scouts; prepatch the scouts were better than the mods, now the mods are better - but those need energy, too. I'm quite happy with using both. Have fun with using energy weapons alone and run out of cao in a mob...
Mikojo
Mikojo

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.23 23:32:00 - [33]

Edited by: Mikojo on 23/01/2007 23:29:25
lol.
xeom
xeom
Veto.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.23 23:34:00 - [34]

roflskates necros 4tw.

And yea right nobody uses EMP or AM

LaughingLaughingLaughing
---

"Those nuclear missiles are for domestic heating." - Scagga
dalman
dalman
Finite Horizon

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.23 23:50:00 - [35]

Posting in a soon locked thread:

Just to point out for all the 'new' players...

When the game went live the range penalties and bonuses on ammo wasn't working (lovely how that wasn't sorted in time, eh).
Hence all ammo had the same optimal range, so as you figure there was no point in not using the highest damage ammo ;)

This thread is from when the range modifiers on ammo was fixed (and it's worth noting that for example radio crystals did much more ammo back in the days than they do now).

Am I forced to have any regret?
I've become the lie, beautiful and free
In my righteous own mind
I adore and preach the insanity you gave to me
Krulla
Krulla
Minmatar
Queens of the Stone Age
Anarchy Empire

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 00:00:00 - [36]

Originally by: Mikojo
Edited by: Mikojo on 23/01/2007 23:29:25
lol.


You fail.
Sigs are for noobs.
schurem
schurem
Silver Snake Enterprise
Interstellar Starbase Syndicate

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 00:03:00 - [37]

Necro'ing is bad umm'kay..
However, I still think EvE needs more and better tactical warning sounds.

<<<< No Boundaries, No Fences, Fly Free Or Die Trying >>>>

Twin blade
Twin blade
Minmatar
The Caldari Confederation

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 00:10:00 - [38]

OMG look at the date for the love of god look at the date this was first posted.
!
Kai Jyokoroi
Kai Jyokoroi
The Collective
Against ALL Authorities

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 00:33:00 - [39]

Omg 3 year old thread!!1 Shocked
_____________
Yeah, we invented logoffskis, logonskis, Crtl-Q, POS spamming, whoring 10/10's with alts and Teamspeak DDoS bombs. But at least we don't have DB Preacher.
Abyssal Angel
Abyssal Angel
Caldari
Solar Wind

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 00:58:00 - [40]

Awesome, I was ready to tear the site apart for those patchnotes, thought I had missed something important :)
Please resize image to a maximum of 400 x 120, not exceeding 24000 bytes, ta! If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Deckard
Neuromandis
Neuromandis

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 01:35:00 - [41]

Oh Lords Of Darkness,
Grace us 2006 n00bies with the wisdom of 4 years past,
give the power to your chosen necromancer
to resurrect that dead, buried, decayed, cremated, outdated, obsolete, taken by the wind, forgotten even by its OP, cursed upon, thread...!!!

ARISE MY CHILD!!!!
Azerrad InExile
Azerrad InExile

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 01:42:00 - [42]

LOCK ALL THREADS THAT HAVE BEEN INACTIVE FOR OVER 6 MONTHS!!
Vicious Phoenix
Vicious Phoenix

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 01:46:00 - [43]

lol @ idiots bumping 3 and a half year old threads. Were you even born then?



CFW (Certified Forum Warrior)
I kill people ingame too.
madaluap
madaluap
Gallente
Mercenary Forces
Exquisite Malevolence

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 02:02:00 - [44]

YES YES YES


GOD YES, finnaly i looked @ the date first instead of scrolling through each post and thinking wtf? wtf? W T F?

/emote is proud of himself...

lock this please though ugh
_________________________________________________
Breetime
Sexual Chocolate
Sexual Chocolate
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 02:11:00 - [45]

Originally by: Mikojo
Edited by: Mikojo on 23/01/2007 23:29:25
lol.
I hope you get banned


Dahak2150
Dahak2150
Chaos Monkeys

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 02:55:00 - [46]

Originally by: Sexual Chocolate
Originally by: Mikojo
Edited by: Mikojo on 23/01/2007 23:29:25
lol.
I hope you get banned


Seconded.
----------------
1337 = I III III VII
Cookie = Confectionary Discus

If you're on IE, pretend this is transparent whil
goodby4u
goodby4u
Logistic Technologies Incorporated
Free Trade Coalition

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 03:09:00 - [47]

Wow this is quite funny,they were apocalyptic back then too Very Happy
__________________________________________
Yes it is great being amarr.
DeMundus
DeMundus
The Establishment
Establishment

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 04:33:00 - [48]

Look ma'! 2003 Zombie thread! Bring me my Shotgun!
Abandon all hope But take care of teh cake!11 - Immy
Karasu Kaizoku
Karasu Kaizoku
Caldari
Shikei Army

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 05:26:00 - [49]

Originally by: dalman
Posting in a soon locked thread:

Just to point out for all the 'new' players...

When the game went live the range penalties and bonuses on ammo wasn't working (lovely how that wasn't sorted in time, eh).
Hence all ammo had the same optimal range, so as you figure there was no point in not using the highest damage ammo ;)

This thread is from when the range modifiers on ammo was fixed (and it's worth noting that for example radio crystals did much more ammo back in the days than they do now).



I thought that was funny about complaining about EMP having a -35% range now it's liek 50%
-

Want a sexy signature? EVEMail me, prices can be discussed.
Arushia
Arushia
Nova Inc.

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 07:28:00 - [50]

Nice history lesson for us newer chars. Oh and IBTL.
----
I accept that this post reflects upon my corp, even if I claim it does not.
Tasty Burger
Tasty Burger

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 13:28:00 - [51]

ffs
-
It's great being Minmatar, ain't it?
Twin blade
Twin blade
Minmatar
The Caldari Confederation

Take me to the EVE-Online forum thread View author posting habits View only posts by author
Posted - 2007.01.24 13:33:00 - [52]

Guy's let it die stop bring it back.
!
   
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
 
Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20251002/0146
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.