| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
397
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 19:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't
Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money.
This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG.
You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special.
AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market.
But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again
AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality .
They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining.
But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could.
So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. |

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Another quality thread brought by SFKFK.
In b4 the lock. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Another quality thread brought by SFKFK.
In b4 the lock. This is a legitimate treatment of how AFK mining devalues the whole profession of mining. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Kale Eledar
Wolves and Knights The Irukandji
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Oh god why am I taking the bait
Eh....well...yeah. I see your point, but I don't think it's about pure profit. It's profit for effort expended.
Granted, trading with good skills takes micromanagement but is generally easy and is actually legit, but someone not even playing Eve is certainly doing less work for isk.
The real stupidity is that they are missing out on all the cool stuff in the game. First come smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever.
ah i love you GCSE business students.
once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
399
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are.
So for AFK ice mining do you prefer the mackinaw or skiff types? |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Your knowledge of economics is impressive to a human being, I'll grant you that.
AFK mining lasers and bots don't care how impressive your mention of motivation theory is, though.
AFK mining lasers and bots aren't motivated by anything. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. So for AFK ice mining do you prefer the mackinaw or skiff types?
depends, ship and fittings largely depend on the length of the episode of each tv show. i like to time it so that my cargo is full at roughly the same time as the episode ends, or slightly longer if i need to grab snacks, or stuff like that. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
399
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. So for AFK ice mining do you prefer the mackinaw or skiff types? depends, ship and fittings largely depend on the length of the episode of each tv show. i like to time it so that my cargo is full at roughly the same time as the episode ends, or slightly longer if i need to grab snacks, or stuff like that.
This is the exact kind of person who I am going after in my post
Do you watch Firefly too? |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. So for AFK ice mining do you prefer the mackinaw or skiff types? depends, ship and fittings largely depend on the length of the episode of each tv show. i like to time it so that my cargo is full at roughly the same time as the episode ends, or slightly longer if i need to grab snacks, or stuff like that. This is the exact kind of person who I am going after in my post  Do you watch Firefly too?
nope, and it's pretty far down on my list of "things i might watch one day".
i understand exactly what you're saying in your post, however you make the flaw of thinking i give a **** about how much isk/hour i'm earning. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
572
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:15:00 -
[11] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. So for AFK ice mining do you prefer the mackinaw or skiff types? depends, ship and fittings largely depend on the length of the episode of each tv show. i like to time it so that my cargo is full at roughly the same time as the episode ends, or slightly longer if i need to grab snacks, or stuff like that.
I lol'd, hard.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money.
It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off.
So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
399
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort.
Oh god it begins!
Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power.
Of course you're making money, I acknowledged that. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1702
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't.
Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
210
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't. Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard.
|

Torvin Yulus
State War Academy Caldari State
115
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
YOU SUDDENLY FORUMS FORUM KINGS ARE NOTHING BUT A CONFIRME D GOON ALT GRIEFER. I CANS EE THROUGH YOU AND I KNOW WHAT YOU DO. YOU POST PRO GOON ANTI CAREBEAR PROPAGANDA AND IM GETTING ******* SICK OF IT. JESUS ******* CHRIST.
but i am not mad. im ok. because in the decade to come my people will be vidnicated
i pay my money and i am entitled to play the game the way i want to play it, not the way some goon griefer tell me to. i like afk mining i think its fun and it gives me the chance to do housework and homework and watch tv. and i made money.
i bet your one of the aspie neckbear fcs who yell at people for not fitting the damage control II instead of a damage control I. because that totally would have saved them im a pubby and im proud |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power.
incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve.
in fact, if i did it your way it'd cost me more money on my bills because i'd have spent an hour playing eve and i wouldn't have got anything else done so i'd then have to spend more time with the computer on to get things finished... Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Malphilos wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't. Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve. For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard. That'd be fine..
People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely.
When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value suffers. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too.
Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner.
Thanks for the great question. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power.
Of course you're making money, I acknowledged that.
I am not that much of a miner (I trade) but in any case, trading while mining justifies the electricity.
Watching a video while mining => the computer uses like 5 more watts out of 700 it's using anyway so.... who cares for those 5W?
Darth Gustav wrote: Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE. Make it less craptastic of a mechanic and you'll magically see people willing to actually play it. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kara Vix
Sanford and Son Salvage Peregrine Nation
87
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
These threads just keep going on and on and on. Get a life already. |

Telegram Sam
Shoot 2 Thrill
454
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. in fact, if i did it your way it'd cost me more money on my bills because i'd have spent an hour playing eve and i wouldn't have got anything else done so i'd then have to spend more time with the computer on to get things finished... Ha ha! Made me laugh in my cubicle, I might get fired now. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power.
Of course you're making money, I acknowledged that. I am not that much of a miner (I trade) but in any case, trading while mining justifies the electricity. Watching a video while mining => the computer uses like 5 more watts out of 700 it's using anyway so.... who cares for those 5W? Darth Gustav wrote: Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE. Make it less craptastic of a mechanic and you'll magically see people willing to actually play it. You mean as opposed to now, where tons of people are playing it "AFK" or by "macro"?
You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
210
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Malphilos wrote:
For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard.
That'd be fine.. People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely. When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value sufferes. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too. Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner. Thanks for the great question.
You're welcome! I have more:
When they're sitting at their keyboard, does it matter where their eyes are pointing? What if they're at the keyboard but asleep? How do wireless keyboards fit into this scheme? What's the impact of running EVE and Firefly on the same display? While sleeping? In what units are you measuring effort (as in "zero effort")?
|

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
573
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:33:00 -
[24] - Quote
Well, this escalated quickly.
|

Xercodo
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
1436
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
I think that miners simply need more yield to make prices go down. A tier 3 BS should not be over 250 mill dammit! They're supposed to be 150 D: and tier 2 should be 100 and tier 1 be 50 and BCs should be in the teens and high 20s D:
The mining profession isn't very much of a popular one and thus a relatively small % of the population does it. If this % stays roughly the same as the game grows then there will always been a obligation for the small mining population to keep up with the non-mining populaton's needs.
Give them more yield per person and you get lowered mineral prices and eventually everything levels out and the miners end up making exactly the same ISK they made with last season's best mining ship but the economy as a whole will benefit from lowered prices.
Hopefully, since the cost of living, so to speak, would go down then PLEX might too. The Drake is a Lie |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
647
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:34:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Make it less craptastic of a mechanic and you'll magically see people willing to actually play it. but if they do that, and you have to pay attention to your screen to mine, it won't be viable to mine with 20 accounts, and ccp will lose subs.
so we all know that mining is never going to be less afkable. not to mention if less accounts are mining, less ore is being mined, supply is lower, prices go up, tears start flooding the forums... it's just unpleasant for every one. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:35:00 -
[27] - Quote
Malphilos wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Malphilos wrote:
For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard.
That'd be fine.. People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely. When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value sufferes. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too. Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner. Thanks for the great question. You're welcome! I have more: When they're sitting at their keyboard, does it matter where their eyes are pointing? What if they're at the keyboard but asleep? How do wireless keyboards fit into this scheme? What's the impact of running EVE and Firefly on the same display? While sleeping? In what units are you measuring effort (as in "zero effort")? Only the last question deserves any answer.
Effort is described in terms of work, or force divided by distance, to achieve it.
In this case I'm going to use Joules (J) for the unit. Nevertheless, a zero value here is equal to a zero value for any other unit of work I'm familiar with.
I hope that helps. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |
|

CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
529

|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Deleted some trolling posts. Community Representative GÇ+ EVE Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Malphilos
State War Academy Caldari State
210
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Malphilos wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Malphilos wrote:
For the unenlightened, please explain how it's worse than mining with someone at the keyboard.
That'd be fine.. People at keyboards have limits. Limits are actually good for economies. They reinforce minimum values, rather than allowing them to sag indefinitely. When everyone can gather resources with zero effort those resources' value sufferes. As a result, the value of the profession as a whole suffers, too. Only when resources are finite in availability will there be no difference between a miner ATK and a bot/AFK miner. Thanks for the great question. You're welcome! I have more: When they're sitting at their keyboard, does it matter where their eyes are pointing? What if they're at the keyboard but asleep? How do wireless keyboards fit into this scheme? What's the impact of running EVE and Firefly on the same display? While sleeping? In what units are you measuring effort (as in "zero effort")? Only the last question deserves any answer. Effort is described in terms of work, or force divided by distance, to achieve it. In this case I'm going to use Joules (J) for the unit. Nevertheless, a zero value here is equal to a zero value for any other unit of work I'm familiar with. I hope that helps.
Oh, I think they're all valid and reasonable questions. I think it's just that the answers lack the punch you're seeking.
I am also saddened that you've seen fit to so effectively rebut the entire premise of the "zero effort" claim before we're finished having fun with it. Now the OP will have to re-work the entire screed.  |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
483
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve.
Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend.
The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing.
Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
755
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:46:00 -
[32] - Quote
A good contender for 'original post of the year?
He faces stiff competition mind you. This is not a signature. |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
647
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:47:00 -
[33] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though.
that situation only becomes reality when ice, and all of it's refined products are worth exactly 0 isk on the market.
that will never happen, hence there will always be afk ice miners. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1703
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. that situation only becomes reality when ice, and all of it's refined products are worth exactly 0 isk on the market. that will never happen, hence there will always be afk ice miners. Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
368
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:55:00 -
[35] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. I'm not sure that is even possible at this point as the resources being AFK'd are in such high demand. They can never 0 out though they can approach it. The best that can happen is it stabilizes as some decide it's not even worth their AFK time. Worse case we get no new miners and the activity stagnates at the minimum return that demand will allow. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
483
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 20:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Here's a thought: you do pay for electricity right? you could have invested an hour of effort to make far more than you made leaving your system on all day AFK mining and then saved on power. incorrect assumption #2; the computer is only on in order to play eve. Incorrect assumption 2a: I turn my computer off. My computer is on when I sleep, when I'm at work, when I take my cats to the vet. The only time it's not on, is if the electricity goes off, or I go on vacation for more than a weekend. The real problem with the opportunity cost argument is that you make the assumption that actively playing Eve to increase ISK/hour is more important to these people than whatever else they're doing at that time. It's obviously not, or they'd be actively playing EvE instead of AFKing. Hell I know people that afk mine on one account while actively running null sec anoms on the other, thereby increasing their ISK/hour over doing each activity separately.So by actively mining, you're actually giving up the opportunity make more ISK than you could by AFK mining and doing something else more profitable. Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though.
I'm not sure that would happen. The active miners would leave far before the AFKers, because their ISK/per unit of effort will fall below what they consider acceptable levels first. This will actually raise the value of the materials as the supply dries up. I expect the market would stabilize long before AFK miners cared to consider changing their ways. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
368
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:01:00 -
[37] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms.
Having not looked at the changes in ice prices lately, I'd have to ask is this happening? Are we really approaching 0 at any appreciable rate to be concerned or is the argument more academic than realistic in nature at this point? |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
647
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms.
the problem is, due to the demand prices will never be low enough for any one to consider not doing it. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:03:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Oh, come on, it doesn't have to be zero.
If the ice blocks you pull in are only worth 10 ISK, then making 300 ISK for a half hour of AFK mining isn't worthwhile, is it?
300 ISK could be attainable by running the same anomalies you mentioned only slightly (<1%) more efficiently due to lack of multitasking distractions.
The devaluation clearly does not have to be zero, though the threshold will be different for various players/bot farms.
Having not looked at the changes in ice prices lately, I'd have to ask is this happening? Are we really approaching 0 at any appreciable rate to be concerned or is the argument more academic than realistic in nature at this point? They have fallen a long way, one could say we're approaching some low number.
Whether the math says that low number is zero or not is any player's guess, I think.
But there's no doubt we're approaching a very low number based on trends. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dar Manic
Republic University Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:04:00 -
[40] - Quote
A new topic in GD. Finally!!!
This thread is going places... I just don't understand null sec players.
Please note: Anytime I use the phrase PvP in a post, I'm talking about shooting/combat/killing things/blowing things up. Thank you. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2066
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:07:00 -
[41] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again 
You have conflated two issues into one argument. The first issue is AFK mining, the other is boosting yield. These two are independent of each other, and neither is related to the true reason that mining income has dropped off a precipice recently.
More yield will reduce mining income, regardless of whether the mining is done AFK or actively. While you have successfully defined this issue, there have not been any significant boosts to mining yield recently: the highest mining yield is still the Hulk. Other ships have higher yields now, but they do not match the Hulk. They are, effectively, playing catch-up.
One recent change that has had a severely deleterious impact upon mining income was the barge buff. The virtual immunity to ganking afforded by these new ships means that there is no risk to the activity. The lack of risk means more people are actually mining. The population of miners tripled after that buff, and it is this population boost that has brought down the ISK/hr value of mining, not AFK mining, not increases to yield.
As for ice prices: even at their peak of about 400k per unit, ice was not worth mining actively. Putting the same amount of effort into the game, one could make far more ISK per hour flying those same characters in missions, or mining ore. Ice harvesting has only ever been suitable for semi-AFK gameplay at best. Most ice harvesters are aware of this, and accept the fact that their fleet will be bringing in a mediocre income: even at 4M ISK/hr, the income from that fleet is still better than no income at all. This is basic economics: some income is better than no income at all, and the reward of the activity is reflected by the effort required to perform the activity and the risk involved in performing that activity.
Finally, I challenge your assertion that AFK miners could be doing "any other activity". The entire point of AFK mining is that one is, in fact, away from the keyboard (or at the very least, away from the game while at the keyboard doing something else). The very status of being AFK indicates that one could not possibly be doing any other activity in EVE.
Thanks for the article. I hope my contribution will allow your next one to be a little better informed.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
647
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:11:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Thanks for the article. I hope my contribution will allow your next one to be a little better informed.
and i thought this thread wouldn't get any more amusing, i was wrong. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2067
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though.
Well, at some point the AFKers will devalue the resource to the point where Darth Gustav and Suddenly Forums ForumKing will either stop participating in the activity, or resort to the traditional carebear response of complaining on the forums and hoping CCP will "fix" it.
Given the last thing CCP did to "fix" mining (the introduction of the ridiculously tanked barges), I don't expect anything to be seriously done about mining in the future. I've written a blog post about my ideal changes to mining that will still allow the AFKers to ply their trade while rewarding active players. Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:24:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. Well, at some point the AFKers will devalue the resource to the point where Darth Gustav and Suddenly Forums ForumKing will either stop participating in the activity, or resort to the traditional carebear response of complaining on the forums and hoping CCP will "fix" it. Given the last thing CCP did to "fix" mining (the introduction of the ridiculously tanked barges), I don't expect anything to be seriously done about mining in the future. I've written a blog post about my ideal changes to mining that will still allow the AFKers to ply their trade while rewarding active players. You have absolutely no idea who I am or what I stand for, do you?
So should I take the time to read your blog, or should you take the time to read at least one of my posts or threads?
Because I'm not doing any carebearing. Sorry. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2067
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:28:00 -
[45] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:So should I take the time to read your blog, or should you take the time to read at least one of my posts or threads?
Because I'm not doing any carebearing. Sorry.
You are posting in a mining thread. Even more, you are in a mining thread discussing the income of AFK ice harvesting. 
I would humbly suggest that you are actively engaged in the most carebear of carebear activities. Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Gaia Ma'chello
V.I.C.E.
40
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Hm. I got 3 accounts that Ive kept PLEXed for 3 years, 2 faction BS's dead space fit, a T3, A dozen other ships and 13 bil in the wallet. And I afk mine.
What have I failed again? |

Anslo
BHEI Galactic Construction The Unforgiven Alliance
576
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:30:00 -
[47] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:Hm. I got 3 accounts that Ive kept PLEXed for 3 years, 2 faction BS's dead space fit, a T3, A dozen other ships and 13 bil in the wallet. And I afk mine.
What have I failed again?
Apparently failed to be a "non-bot aspirant." I.E. anyone who isn't their pet. 
|

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1704
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:So should I take the time to read your blog, or should you take the time to read at least one of my posts or threads?
Because I'm not doing any carebearing. Sorry. You are posting in a mining thread. Even more, you are in a mining thread discussing the income of AFK ice harvesting.  I would humbly suggest that you are actively engaged in the most carebear of carebear activities. You'd be wrong as wrong can be.
I am a null zealot part-time ganker, part-time bumper who genuinely believes that the risk I add to the game provides value-added content to miners for their benefit as well as my enjoyment.
The fact that what I do is a public service to successful miners because their wares bring more value at market as a result of my actions is all the thanks I need. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
342
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:31:00 -
[49] - Quote
OP failed to explain anything in his post Selective Pressure [FOVRA] is now recruiting! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1797934#post1797934 |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
242
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG. You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again  AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality  . They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining. But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could. So, AFKers, you fail economics forever.
You really didn't think this out, did you?
I'll give you a 1/10 for the time and ISK LOST (see what I did there?) while you posted that failed understanding of what this game is all about. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2067
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 21:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:I am a null zealot part-time ganker, part-time bumper who genuinely believes that the risk I add to the game provides value-added content to successful miners for their benefit as well as my enjoyment.
You are correct. But you are still posting in a thread about ice harvesting income! Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1708
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:00:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:I am a null zealot part-time ganker, part-time bumper who genuinely believes that the risk I add to the game provides value-added content to successful miners for their benefit as well as my enjoyment. You are correct. But you are still posting in a thread about ice harvesting income! Yup.
Because I have a valid opinion about it due to my non-mining pursuits. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Shepard Wong Ogeko
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
146
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:Hm. I got 3 accounts that Ive kept PLEXed for 3 years, 2 faction BS's dead space fit, a T3, A dozen other ships and 13 bil in the wallet. And I afk mine.
What have I failed again?
I got all that and a capital ship in less than a year of playing, and I never afk mine. I very rarely mine in general. Sounds like all that afk mining is holding you back. |

Smiknight
The Plebian Republic
34
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
Omg, I know who the OP is now. It's Al Gore, I'd recognize his fuzzy math speech anywhere! It is disheartening to see a game once steeped in cerebral thought and innovative thinking become so homogenized by entitlement and malaise; that indidviduals should instill a theme park existence through a lack of desire to overcome any and all obstacles and instead demand things be made easier for them via nerfs. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1737
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:20:00 -
[55] - Quote
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:Gaia Ma'chello wrote:Hm. I got 3 accounts that Ive kept PLEXed for 3 years, 2 faction BS's dead space fit, a T3, A dozen other ships and 13 bil in the wallet. And I afk mine.
What have I failed again? I got all that and a capital ship in less than a year of playing, and I never afk mine. I very rarely mine in general. Sounds like all that afk mining is holding you back. Such a pity. Sometimes the desire to afk is the enemy of the great. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Galaxy Pig
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
131
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:28:00 -
[56] - Quote
Kaylee is hot, jus' sayin'... |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
483
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Kaylee is hot, jus' sayin'...
That's very true.
You're wrong about everything else though. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
461
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:49:00 -
[58] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are.
Cool, I've studied business studies, economics and politics and on my management and motivation module i got 97% on the exam.
Let's look at a really basic motivation model shall we?
Quote:Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 1. Physiological needsThe definition of physiological needs is quite obvious; they are the physical requirements for human survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body cannot function properly, and will ultimately fail. Physiological needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met first. Therefore, a human lacking food, love, esteem, or safety would consider the greatest of his/her needs to be food. 2. Safety needsWith their physical needs relatively satisfied, the individual's safety needs take precedence and dominate behavior. In the absence of physical safety GÇô due to war, natural disaster, family violence, childhood abuse, etc. GÇô people may (re-)experience post-traumatic stress disorder or transgenerational trauma. In the absence of economic safety GÇô due to economic crisis and lack of work opportunities GÇô these safety needs manifest themselves in ways such as a preference for job security, grievance procedures for protecting the individual from unilateral authority, savings accounts, insurance policies, reasonable disability accommodations, etc 3. Love and belongingAfter physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third level of human needs is interpersonal and involves feelings of belongingness. The need is especially strong in childhood and can override the need for safety as witnessed in children who cling to abusive parents. Deficiencies within this level of Maslow's hierarchy GÇô due to hospitalism, neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc. GÇô can impact individual's ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships in general, such as friendship, intimacy and family 4. EsteemAll humans have a need to feel respected; this includes the need to have self-esteem and self-respect. Esteem presents the typical human desire to be accepted and valued by others. People often engage in a profession or hobby to gain recognition. 5. Self-actualizationThis level of need refers to what a person's full potential is and the realization of that potential. Maslow describes this level as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be.
Being an expert on motivation theory yourself you'll know Maslow's Hierarchy of needs forms a pyramid and it is generally considered that you need to accomplish one level before you move onto the next, so I have numbered these in the order that they are. Where do you think AFK miners fit?
- Physiological needs? Mining sustains their ability to play EVE so yup, got this stage.
- Safety? With the new mining barge buffs miners have been safer then ever before. So yup.
- Love and belonging? Well there is a lot of animosity towards miners, but that doen't mean they can't have friends. On the other hand how do you make friends when you're afk? I'll give afk miners the benefit of the doubt on this one.
- Esteem? No-one respects miners, so nope don't get this stage.
- Self-Actualisation? You really think AFK mining is the upper limit of your potential as an EVE player? If so I pity you.
Interesting though, turns out afk miners are rubbish at motivational theory as well as economic theory. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1712
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:52:00 -
[59] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Cool, I've studied business studies, economics and politics and on my management and motivation module i got 97% on the exam. Let's look at a really basic motivation model shall we? Quote:Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 1. Physiological needsThe definition of physiological needs is quite obvious; they are the physical requirements for human survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body cannot function properly, and will ultimately fail. Physiological needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met first. Therefore, a human lacking food, love, esteem, or safety would consider the greatest of his/her needs to be food. 2. Safety needsWith their physical needs relatively satisfied, the individual's safety needs take precedence and dominate behavior. In the absence of physical safety GÇô due to war, natural disaster, family violence, childhood abuse, etc. GÇô people may (re-)experience post-traumatic stress disorder or transgenerational trauma. In the absence of economic safety GÇô due to economic crisis and lack of work opportunities GÇô these safety needs manifest themselves in ways such as a preference for job security, grievance procedures for protecting the individual from unilateral authority, savings accounts, insurance policies, reasonable disability accommodations, etc 3. Love and belongingAfter physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third level of human needs is interpersonal and involves feelings of belongingness. The need is especially strong in childhood and can override the need for safety as witnessed in children who cling to abusive parents. Deficiencies within this level of Maslow's hierarchy GÇô due to hospitalism, neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc. GÇô can impact individual's ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships in general, such as friendship, intimacy and family 4. EsteemAll humans have a need to feel respected; this includes the need to have self-esteem and self-respect. Esteem presents the typical human desire to be accepted and valued by others. People often engage in a profession or hobby to gain recognition. 5. Self-actualizationThis level of need refers to what a person's full potential is and the realization of that potential. Maslow describes this level as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be. Being an expert on motivation theory yourself you'll know Maslow's Hierarchy of needs forms a pyramid and it is generally considered that you need to accomplish one level before you move onto the next, so I have numbered these in the order that they are. Where do you think AFK miners fit?
- Physiological needs? Mining sustains their ability to play EVE so yup, got this stage.
- Safety? With the new mining barge buffs miners have been safer then ever before. So yup.
- Love and belonging? Well there is a lot of animosity towards miners, but that doen't mean they can't have friends. On the other hand how do you make friends when you're afk? I'll give afk miners the benefit of the doubt on this one.
- Esteem? No-one respects miners, so nope don't get this stage.
- Self-Actualisation? You really think AFK mining is the upper limit of your potential as an EVE player? If so I pity you.
Interesting though, turns out afk miners are rubbish at motivational theory as well as economic theory. You need a job at CCP.
Your name would henceforth be CCP Maslow.
+1 sir. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
461
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:53:00 -
[60] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:
You need a job at CCP.
Your name would henceforth be CCP Maslow.
+1 sir.
I promise if I ever end up switching from risk management to video game design I'll use that as my name. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

baltec1
Bat Country
2860
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
647
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 22:56:00 -
[62] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Dave stark wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. ah i love you GCSE business students. once your teacher has covered motivation theory, come back here and realise how amusing and incorrect you are. Cool, I've studied business studies, economics and politics and on my management and motivation module i got 97% on the exam. Let's look at a really basic motivation model shall we? Quote:Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs 1. Physiological needsThe definition of physiological needs is quite obvious; they are the physical requirements for human survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body cannot function properly, and will ultimately fail. Physiological needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met first. Therefore, a human lacking food, love, esteem, or safety would consider the greatest of his/her needs to be food. 2. Safety needsWith their physical needs relatively satisfied, the individual's safety needs take precedence and dominate behavior. In the absence of physical safety GÇô due to war, natural disaster, family violence, childhood abuse, etc. GÇô people may (re-)experience post-traumatic stress disorder or transgenerational trauma. In the absence of economic safety GÇô due to economic crisis and lack of work opportunities GÇô these safety needs manifest themselves in ways such as a preference for job security, grievance procedures for protecting the individual from unilateral authority, savings accounts, insurance policies, reasonable disability accommodations, etc 3. Love and belongingAfter physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third level of human needs is interpersonal and involves feelings of belongingness. The need is especially strong in childhood and can override the need for safety as witnessed in children who cling to abusive parents. Deficiencies within this level of Maslow's hierarchy GÇô due to hospitalism, neglect, shunning, ostracism, etc. GÇô can impact individual's ability to form and maintain emotionally significant relationships in general, such as friendship, intimacy and family 4. EsteemAll humans have a need to feel respected; this includes the need to have self-esteem and self-respect. Esteem presents the typical human desire to be accepted and valued by others. People often engage in a profession or hobby to gain recognition. 5. Self-actualizationThis level of need refers to what a person's full potential is and the realization of that potential. Maslow describes this level as the desire to accomplish everything that one can, to become the most that one can be. Being an expert on motivation theory yourself you'll know Maslow's Hierarchy of needs forms a pyramid and it is generally considered that you need to accomplish one level before you move onto the next, so I have numbered these in the order that they are. Where do you think AFK miners fit?
- Physiological needs? Mining sustains their ability to play EVE so yup, got this stage.
- Safety? With the new mining barge buffs miners have been safer then ever before. So yup.
- Love and belonging? Well there is a lot of animosity towards miners, but that doen't mean they can't have friends. On the other hand how do you make friends when you're afk? I'll give afk miners the benefit of the doubt on this one.
- Esteem? No-one respects miners, so nope don't get this stage.
- Self-Actualisation? You really think AFK mining is the upper limit of your potential as an EVE player? If so I pity you.
Interesting though, turns out afk miners are rubbish at motivational theory as well as economic theory.
considering the entire of the OP hinges on physiological needs, give or take based on how you translate this stuff to the game... you pretty much proved my point.
must admit, it's been 7 years since i've seen any of that. oh the horrible memories. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1713
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one.
Vaerah:
I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession."
So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim:
1) Go into dungeon.
2) Fight your way to some ore.
3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore.
4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore.
Now what does this indicate?
In Skyrim:
1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity.
2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time.
3) Yield is low.
4) Mining logistics are time-consuming.
I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games.
So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online?
My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole.
I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
465
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:13:00 -
[64] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:
considering the entire of the OP hinges on physiological needs, give or take based on how you translate this stuff to the game... you pretty much proved my point.
must admit, it's been 7 years since i've seen any of that. oh the horrible memories.
Umm no the OP's point is that the more you mine the less the material you mine are worth and then you all whinge for more yield to mine even more and then you all whinge that your yield isnt enough to make money etc etc.
So actually what he's arguing is that you're not fulfilling your physiological needs by mining as in the long run it means miners will put themselves out of pocket.
If he had actually mentioned motivational theory like I had he'd have also pointed out that an AFK miner is so far away from self actualisation you have to question why they are doing the mining in the first place. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
465
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:15:00 -
[65] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
Oh thats easy you can find it on EVE online. Just go mine in a system where James 315 is, he's the most compelling mining content CCP have added in ages 
Never not double post. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1713
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:18:00 -
[66] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
Oh thats easy you can find it on EVE online. Just go mine in a system where James 315 is, he's the most compelling mining content CCP have added in ages  Never not double post. I kind of thought the dessie buff/Tier 3 BCs were a bit of a better deal than bumping is, to be quite frank.
Removing the ability of GSCs to disrupt smartbombs would go a long way toward the achieving the goal we share of compelling mining content, though, I think. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Beekeeper Bob
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
292
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:20:00 -
[67] - Quote
How does a Troll like this stay open for three pages, and mine get brain-wiped within five minutes? 
"Paranoia is the number one killer of idiots and Republicans." |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
649
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:25:00 -
[68] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Dave stark wrote:
considering the entire of the OP hinges on physiological needs, give or take based on how you translate this stuff to the game... you pretty much proved my point.
must admit, it's been 7 years since i've seen any of that. oh the horrible memories.
Umm no the OP's point is that the more you mine the less the materialsyou mine are worth. Then you all whinge for more yield to mine even more and then you all whinge that your yield isnt enough to make money etc etc. So actually what he's arguing is that you're not fulfilling your physiological needs by mining as in the long run it means miners will put themselves out of pocket. If he had actually mentioned motivational theory like I had he'd have also pointed out that an AFK miner is so far away from self actualisation you have to question why they are doing the mining in the first place.
it does, because he assumes isk is the motivating factor. which, it isn't. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
466
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:26:00 -
[69] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:How does a Troll like this stay open for three pages, and mine get brain-wiped within five minutes? 
L2Troll "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
368
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:29:00 -
[70] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Dave stark wrote: considering the entire of the OP hinges on physiological needs, give or take based on how you translate this stuff to the game... you pretty much proved my point.
must admit, it's been 7 years since i've seen any of that. oh the horrible memories.
Umm no the OP's point is that the more you mine the less the materialsyou mine are worth. Then you all whinge for more yield to mine even more and then you all whinge that your yield isnt enough to make money etc etc. So actually what he's arguing is that you're not fulfilling your physiological needs by mining as in the long run it means miners will put themselves out of pocket. If he had actually mentioned motivational theory like I had he'd have also pointed out that an AFK miner is so far away from self actualisation you have to question why they are doing the mining in the first place. Self actualization as a character or as a person trying to use a character in a game for gain with minimal effort? If the former than you have a point. If the latter then it would seem the more important part of the equation is the activity happening away from the keyboard. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1739
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:35:00 -
[71] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:If he had actually mentioned motivational theory like I had he'd have also pointed out that an AFK miner is so far away from self actualisation you have to question why they are doing the mining in the first place. Now that you mention it ... hm. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Inquisitor Kitchner
Galaxy Punks Executive Outcomes
466
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:40:00 -
[72] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Self actualization as a character or as a person trying to use a character in a game for gain with minimal effort? If the former than you have a point. If the latter then it would seem the more important part of the equation is the activity happening away from the keyboard.
Self actualisation as a player though wouldn't just be "can they mine with the minimum effort?" it would be "Can they be the very best that is physically possible for them to be?"
If you afk mine in EVE and the answer to that question is "Yes, I am the very best AFK miner I can be and thats all my potential is in this game" then I do genuinely feel sorry for you. "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1739
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:43:00 -
[73] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Self actualization as a character or as a person trying to use a character in a game for gain with minimal effort? If the former than you have a point. If the latter then it would seem the more important part of the equation is the activity happening away from the keyboard.
Self actualisation as a player though wouldn't just be "can they mine with the minimum effort?" it would be "Can they be the very best that is physically possible for them to be?" If you afk mine in EVE and the answer to that question is "Yes, I am the very best AFK miner I can be and thats all my potential is in this game" then I do genuinely feel sorry for you. According to James 315, many miners aspire to be the best at mining, aka, somewhat similar to the tireless "bot".
Of course, bot-aspirant behavior is prohibited under the Code, for the good of all the mining community. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
368
|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:51:00 -
[74] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Self actualization as a character or as a person trying to use a character in a game for gain with minimal effort? If the former than you have a point. If the latter then it would seem the more important part of the equation is the activity happening away from the keyboard.
Self actualisation as a player though wouldn't just be "can they mine with the minimum effort?" it would be "Can they be the very best that is physically possible for them to be?" If you afk mine in EVE and the answer to that question is "Yes, I am the very best AFK miner I can be and thats all my potential is in this game" then I do genuinely feel sorry for you. Again, that is it you limit your actualization to the role of the character. If I can do something else more meaningful outside of game while gaining inside of the game that from a motivation standpoint could enrich both activities.
But if all you care about is achieving your best character potential so far as isk earning, and your character is not dedicated to mining (in which case AFK mining in no way differentiates from ATK mining in regard to possible income generation and you are achieving your potential anyways), you wouldn't be mining anyways. But really, who cares about efficiency? |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1111

|
Posted - 2012.11.16 23:55:00 -
[75] - Quote
Removed some off topic posts. Keep it on topic please. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
129
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:01:00 -
[76] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one. Vaerah: I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession." So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim: 1) Go into dungeon. 2) Fight your way to some ore. 3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore. 4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore. Now what does this indicate? In Skyrim: 1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity. 2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time. 3) Yield is low. 4) Mining logistics are time-consuming. I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games. So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online? My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole. I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
The only other games I ever played where harvesting was embedded in the game was Saga of Ryzom now just called Ryzom. It was an Indi game that bankrupted. The other being Perpetuum. I've said before, if people really just wanted to Mine, harvest and manufacture, Perpetuum is a good game. Sadly it's PvP premised and none happens. So you will be making bots that will never get used. It made the same mistake EVE made. It built huge frontiers and forced everyone through exact pipes to get to them so it became a game of choke point farming. |

Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
5
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:06:00 -
[77] - Quote
Buddy of mine with 4 toons semi afk mines for over a billion a week... while he studies for tests for classes. He isnt minding it!  |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:07:00 -
[78] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1715
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:08:00 -
[79] - Quote
Sisohiv wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one. Vaerah: I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession." So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim: 1) Go into dungeon. 2) Fight your way to some ore. 3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore. 4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore. Now what does this indicate? In Skyrim: 1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity. 2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time. 3) Yield is low. 4) Mining logistics are time-consuming. I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games. So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online? My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole. I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games? The only other games I ever played where harvesting was embedded in the game was Saga of Ryzom now just called Ryzom. It was an Indi game that bankrupted. The other being Perpetuum. I've said before, if people really just wanted to Mine, harvest and manufacture, Perpetuum is a good game. Sadly it's PvP premised and none happens. So you will be making bots that will never get used. It made the same mistake EVE made. It built huge frontiers and forced everyone through exact pipes to get to them so it became a game of choke point farming. I didnt include SWG in my list because it has a unique system yet to be duplicated with the dynamic stats on static ores. I just want to be clear though, I'm interested in interesting mining content.
What would you say makes Perpetuum's mining system "interesting"? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1715
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:09:00 -
[80] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? I'm sorry what?
I play Eve to blow people up.
The size of my wallet isn't a factor. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:15:00 -
[81] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:baltec1 wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Hey, in most other games mining is not this hideous farce we got in EvE.
You didnt mine asteroids in SWG... Nice one. Vaerah: I have to admit I don't play a lot of games that feature mining as a "profession." So to maximize my limited experience of other games' mining, let's look at Skyrim: 1) Go into dungeon. 2) Fight your way to some ore. 3) Harvest it for no longer than 30 seconds for a scant few GP worth of ore. 4) Leave the dungeon to either forge something or sell the refined ore. Now what does this indicate? In Skyrim: 1) Mining is not a profession, it's a brief activity. 2) It involves legitimate combat nearly every time. 3) Yield is low. 4) Mining logistics are time-consuming. I'm sorry but that's all the experience I have with mining in other games. So in Skyrim, how is mining (as an activity) "more interesting" than it is in Eve Online? My answer would be that the risk that's involved combined with the design of immersion-by-necessity raise the arbitrary value of the goods acquired and therefore the activity as a whole. I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
Entropia Online, Istaria (expecially the latter, it requires some extensive digging). It's still not *awesome sauce* to do, but at least you can die or be prevented from mining in a number of ways.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
130
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:17:00 -
[82] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: I just want to be clear though, I'm interested in interesting mining content.
What would you say makes Perpetuum's mining system "interesting"?
It seemed to happen faster than EVE.
I actually forgot one. Pirates of the Burning Sea has a nice Econ system. It was all done using facility installation. Your work wasn't in the harvest, it was in the shipping. That's one of the things EVE mining never accounts for. Shipping is as much work as the actual mining. I have 32 million Toxic metal. It will never make it to market. I'm too lazy to haul it. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:19:00 -
[83] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? I'm sorry what? I play Eve to blow people up. The size of my wallet isn't a factor.
The size of CCP's wallet preservation.
I mean, you have to think quite low of yourself if you play a game where the developers are so much hands-tied to profit that they willingly keep a bad mechanic bad for the sake of keeping more subs. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1716
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:23:00 -
[84] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: You really think all those subs won't change status if mining gets an "interestingness" buff? You really think they'll be excited?
Sometimes, Vaerah, I don't see what the points of your posts are.
So, you still play a game made by a company that in your opinion keeps the worst mining implementation ever only because of wallet preservation? I'm sorry what? I play Eve to blow people up. The size of my wallet isn't a factor. The size of CCP's wallet preservation. I mean, you have to think quite low of yourself if you play a game where the developers are so much hands-tied to profit that they willingly keep a bad mechanic bad for the sake of keeping more subs. Your mode of cogitation is practically foreign to me.
How was I supposed to pull "CCP's wallet preservation" from the original quote?
Further, the game with literally the worst mining also happens to literally have the most fun PVP, so there you go.
I'm trying to bring the rest of the game up to the caliber of the PVP as a service to those who know no different. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1995
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:31:00 -
[85] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote: Your mode of cogitation is practically foreign to me.
I know, my English is self taught . If I have to write down any lengthy concepts, they quickly turn into gibber-English.
Darth Gustav wrote: Further, the game with literally the worst mining also happens to literally have the most fun PVP, so there you go.
I'm trying to bring the rest of the game up to the caliber of the PVP as a service to those who know no different.
I'd like you brought the rest of the game up to PvP standards by coming where I live and eradicating 50+ barges a day. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1716
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:33:00 -
[86] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Darth Gustav wrote: Your mode of cogitation is practically foreign to me.
I know, my English is self taught  . If I have to write down any lengthy concepts, they quickly turn into gibber-English. Darth Gustav wrote: Further, the game with literally the worst mining also happens to literally have the most fun PVP, so there you go.
I'm trying to bring the rest of the game up to the caliber of the PVP as a service to those who know no different.
I'd like you brought the rest of the game up to PvP standards by coming where I live and eradicating 50+ barges a day. Sadly, I am just one man. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
73
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:53:00 -
[87] - Quote
Kale Eledar wrote:The real stupidity is that they are missing out on all the cool stuff in the game. The real stupidity is that there are some players who don't understand that not everyone shares their opinion of what is "cool". |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1717
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 00:54:00 -
[88] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Kale Eledar wrote:The real stupidity is that they are missing out on all the cool stuff in the game. The real stupidity is that there are some players who don't understand that not everyone shares their opinion of what is "cool". The real cool is that there are some players who don't understand that not everyone shares their opinion of what is "stupidity". He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Tesal
48
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:22:00 -
[89] - Quote
Whats the opportunity cost of playing a video game when you could be out in the real world doing real world stuff. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1721
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:27:00 -
[90] - Quote
Tesal wrote:Whats the opportunity cost of playing a video game when you could be out in the real world doing real world stuff. If you're mining AFK the opportunity cost is zero.
You can play video games (Eve Online, which used to be a hard game) and court supermodels (still a hard game) at the same time. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. Have not followed the entire thread.
The first assumption is wrong because the "opportunity cost" is decided when you click "enter game". Time spent in game means time not spent IRL.
So regardless of your activity, the OC is the same. Time out of your life, regardless.
Your welcome.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:42:00 -
[92] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG. You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again  AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality  . They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining. But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could. So, AFKers, you fail economics forever.
I read it all in its entirety but yet all I still herd is blaaa blaa blaaa miners suck. If you want to be taken serious then post verifiable numbers from reputable sources. I donGÇÖt have any numbers of miners being profitable but I do know in hi-secI can afk ice mine on one account while running missions on the other. It seemed profitable to me.
The only other example is a miner person in gameGÇŞGÇŞChibra, I think he has a few isk.
|

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1722
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:48:00 -
[93] - Quote
HollyShocker 2inthestink wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG. You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again  AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality  . They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining. But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could. So, AFKers, you fail economics forever. I read it all in its entirety but yet all I still herd is blaaa blaa blaaa miners suck. If you want to be taken serious then post verifiable numbers from reputable sources. I donGÇÖt have any numbers of miners being profitable but I do know in hi-secI can afk ice mine on one account while running missions on the other. It seemed profitable to me. The only other example is a miner person in gameGÇŞGÇŞChibra, I think he has a few isk. The issue isn't whether or not ISK can be made now.
It's whether or not the unrestricted and umitigated access to materials devalues the profession over time.
The answer is a resounding, "Yes, it does." He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1722
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:50:00 -
[94] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. Have not followed the entire thread. The first assumption is wrong because the "opportunity cost" is decided when you click "enter game". Time spent in game means time not spent IRL. So regardless of your activity, the OC is the same. Time out of your life, regardless. Your welcome. While ice mining AFK you can read a story to your toddler.
While ice mining AFK you can do laundry.
While ice mining AFK you can watch Firefly.
Where is the opportunity cost again?
Oh, the few minutes between logging in and getting your mining vessel in position. 
While ice mining AFK you can court a supermodel.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Eclipse Rhade
Blades of the Exiled Angel
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:56:00 -
[95] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. This seems counter intuitive to some people - if you're making money, you're winning right? WRONG. You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special. AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market. But we all know that miners mine themselves into poverty, they've done it since the start of EVE. They complain that they don't make enough money and ask for more yield, which causes them to make either the same or often less than they did before. They then proceed to ask for more yield again  AFK takes stupid up to 11. AFK miners are collectively mining themselves into mediocrity because "I can make teh isk while watching Kaylee on Firefly" mentality  . They may be making accounting profits but the facts are they make zero or worse economic profits. Quite literally, you'd be better of doing any other activity than AFK mining. But since AFK miners only understand a wallet blink, they will think they're gaming the system by making money afk. But in reality they're selling themselves as short as you possibly could. So, AFKers, you fail economics forever.
Actually there is no opportunity cost to afk mining in most cases. When I AFK mine I usually have 2 choices. Do homework and nothing or do homework while afk mining. There is no loss from not afk mining. Also I afk mine on a second window while doing incursions. An extra 5 mil an hour is an extra five mil an hour while your complete focus is on something else.
My alternative to afk mining is usually nothing. Its not afk mine instead of incussions or homework or videos. Its if i want to log in to mine while doing those activities. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1741
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 01:59:00 -
[96] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:While ice mining AFK you can read a story to your toddler.
While ice mining AFK you can do laundry.
While ice mining AFK you can watch Firefly.
Where is the opportunity cost again? You can even listen to Boat tell a story while mining. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Sentamon
261
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 03:54:00 -
[97] - Quote
Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times.
~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1733
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 04:34:00 -
[98] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times.
Because of Falcon. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1754
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 04:39:00 -
[99] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe.
Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~) Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Maddy Joringer
Invicta Animas
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:18:00 -
[100] - Quote
Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:22:00 -
[101] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads.
Am I wrong? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Maddy Joringer
Invicta Animas
46
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:29:00 -
[102] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong?
yeah...the hulk got buffed after that .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:30:00 -
[103] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then.
Honestly, good for them for knowing better. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Maddy Joringer
Invicta Animas
46
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:32:00 -
[104] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then. Honestly, good for them for knowing better.
They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum.. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then. Honestly, good for them for knowing better. They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum.. I think the hate is mostly RP. I don't hate players - any of them. Some of it is a perspective thing.
Us vs. them stuff either way. Definitely not for everybody after a 12 hour day. Then again neither would getting ganked during Hulkageddon be for everyone after a 12 hour shift.  He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
280
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:40:00 -
[106] - Quote
Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote:Another one of those "EVeeel Mineerz keeeling eeeve" Yawn..
this must be the zillionth one I think gankers used to say the same thing about "Buff Hulk" threads. Am I wrong? yeah...the hulk got buffed after that  .. Ill tell this the zillionth time..if u suspect an AFK miner... you can report that to GM instead of making this thread into another... "Minerz are evil" thread . All this hate being generated is just sad . 3 of my friends decided not to play eve just after visiting the forums... They probably wouldn't have had the chops for Eve then. Honestly, good for them for knowing better. They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1742
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 08:45:00 -
[107] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote: They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. So let me get this straight.
You don't want to do things. Other people do.
In a game.
And you're upset because you can't ignore them...
...in the context of...
...the same exact game?
So your chief complaint is that certain people (you) don't want certain people (me) to play the game?
Or do I have you and me backward? Because I want miners to play the game. I even want them to succeed. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
280
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 09:00:00 -
[108] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Ocih wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote: They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. So let me get this straight. You don't want to do things. Other people do. In a game. And you're upset because you can't ignore them... ...in the context of... ...the same exact game? So your chief complaint is that certain people (you) don't want certain people (me) to play the game? Or do I have you and me backward? Because I want miners to play the game. I even want them to succeed.
You seem to have read that all wrong.
I've never shot a miner in my 7 years of EVE. I feel bad if I don't kill the rats orbiting a T1 barge in a belt. Even if he does seem to be AFK. I'm looking at the vitriol here on the forums. I have no issue at all ignoring Miners. Worse case scenario for me is I can buy 60 mill Abaddons and die in a fire 10 times more than I do now. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1743
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 09:05:00 -
[109] - Quote
Ocih wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Ocih wrote:Maddy Joringer wrote: They just could not understand all the hate being thrown around for an internet space ship game. Its not something one likes to experience after a 12 hour shift... They are eve material..i can say that i should have asked them not to visit the forum..
It's where I question motive when I see miner hate. They do the crap we don't want to do and we can't even ignore them? You can spin it any way you want, it comes down to this. Certain people don;t want certain people playing EVE and that is not a good thing. Any way you spin it. So let me get this straight. You don't want to do things. Other people do. In a game. And you're upset because you can't ignore them... ...in the context of... ...the same exact game? So your chief complaint is that certain people (you) don't want certain people (me) to play the game? Or do I have you and me backward? Because I want miners to play the game. I even want them to succeed. You seem to have read that all wrong. I've never shot a miner in my 7 years of EVE. I feel bad if I don't kill the rats orbiting a T1 barge in a belt. Even if he does seem to be AFK. I'm looking at the vitriol here on the forums. I have no issue at all ignoring Miners. Worse case scenario for me is I can buy 60 mill Abaddons and die in a fire 10 times more than I do now. I did read it wrong. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
The vitriol isn't all entirely ill-founded, at least not in the context of the game.
There are two drastically differing player agendas at work in the sandbox.
That's the best perspective I can give you on it I guess. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
1996
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 10:49:00 -
[110] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe. Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~)
That was exactly one of the CCP points with those new exhumers. By making them a "click once every 40 mins" affair, bots become useless.
To see how important AFK mining has become, suffice to say that the AFK ices have totally tanked, while minerals (less AFK, roids deplete in few minutes) are rising. Both resources are in need at this time, both require similarly efficient setups so the only discriminator is the AFK-ness. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
652
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:27:00 -
[111] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe. Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~) That was exactly one of the CCP points with those new exhumers. By making them a "click once every 40 mins" affair, bots become useless. To see how important AFK mining has become, suffice to say that the AFK ices have totally tanked, while minerals (less AFK, roids deplete in few minutes) are rising. Both resources are in need at this time, both require similarly efficient setups so the only discriminator is the AFK-ness.
the mineral prices are more to do with the drone nerf rather than the barge changes. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1755
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:28:00 -
[112] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe. Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~) That was exactly one of the CCP points with those new exhumers. By making them a "click once every 40 mins" affair, bots become useless. To see how important AFK mining has become, suffice to say that the AFK ices have totally tanked, while minerals (less AFK, roids deplete in few minutes) are rising. Both resources are in need at this time, both require similarly efficient setups so the only discriminator is the AFK-ness. the mineral prices are more to do with the drone nerf rather than the barge changes. That was quite a while ago now.
I think I've got to give this one to Vaerah. It's definitely divided by AFKness. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Dave stark
Black Nova Corp. R O G U E
652
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:33:00 -
[113] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Dave stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Sentamon wrote:Why do people have such an aversion to automation? Without it you'd still be living in the 1800's. To automate is what makes us human and separates us from the apes.
Boring repetitive tasks like mining should be automated and the functionality to do so should be built into the game, then people would have to use their brains to work out the most efficient way to mine, and the best places to mine, not sit hunched over the PC, with brain turned off, and *click* zzz *click* *click* a billion times. Just work our how long it takes your mackinaw to fill the cargohold really. A few clicks every 20mins to 30mins will do it, I believe. Who needs bots anymore (besides they're forbidden tech~) That was exactly one of the CCP points with those new exhumers. By making them a "click once every 40 mins" affair, bots become useless. To see how important AFK mining has become, suffice to say that the AFK ices have totally tanked, while minerals (less AFK, roids deplete in few minutes) are rising. Both resources are in need at this time, both require similarly efficient setups so the only discriminator is the AFK-ness. the mineral prices are more to do with the drone nerf rather than the barge changes. That was quite a while ago now. I think I've got to give this one to Vaerah. It's definitely divided by AFKness.
i don't know, all i mine is minerals and i haven't really noticed a price change because of the barges, definitely noticeable after the drone change though. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Irya Boone
Escadron leader
67
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:47:00 -
[114] - Quote
Already ask CCp make mining more like in sci Fi movies ....
Why our asteroids don't orbit at high speed near planets ? or Moons ?
Make asteroids mining a dangerous activity ( runninga after a good asteroid and being Hit by others asteroids orbiting in the other way , make asteroids explode.
In fact, fight with the Roid.... avoid incoming asteroids etc etc Improve C2 class WH More anos more signs ...RENAME null sec system With the name Of REAL Universe Stellar Name like KOI-730 etc etc It xill be awesome-á |

Jonah Gravenstein
Holistic Materials Research Council
3381
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:54:00 -
[115] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: According to James 315, many miners aspire to be the best at mining, aka, somewhat similar to the tireless "bot".
Of course, bot-aspirant behavior is prohibited under the Code, for the good of all the mining community.
The way to become a better miner doesn't lay in aspiring to be a tireless automaton, for rocks at least in lays in mining with company even if it's just chatting in local to kill the boredom, never missing a full cycle, because you actively manage your targets using a survey scanner, knowing just how much ore your strips are capable of pulling out of a rock, and switching rocks when you've ripped the last full cycle out.
Knowing the capabilities of your ship and managing the resources you're harvesting are beyond what an automaton or a bot can do, especially when dealing with resources that deplete, unlike ice.
Blessed are the meek, for they shall be slaughtered -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á---CCP can't patch stupid---
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 11:54:00 -
[116] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:While ice mining AFK you can read a story to your toddler. While ice mining AFK you can do laundry. While ice mining AFK you can watch Firefly. Where is the opportunity cost again? Oh, the few minutes between logging in and getting your mining vessel in position.  While ice mining AFK you can court a supermodel. 

Play game/not play game
that is all.
Anything else is bullshit, obfuscation, propaganda or conflation.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
268
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 12:41:00 -
[117] - Quote
OP is hilariously blind to the reasons people AFK mine. If you have any further thoughts on something i've posted, or want to ask an unrelated question feel free to contact me by EvE Mail or by private conversation if i'm online. BUDDY TRIALS AVAILABLE - 21days plus big ISK bonus and starting assistance |

Ragnarok DDinc
Black Merchants
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 13:01:00 -
[118] - Quote
Some people Ice mine when they can't devote a lot of attention to the game but are still on or near their computer IE: Work/School/Homework ect.
I've tried missions and ore mining(doable but annoying) before while doing HW, just doesn't work out as smoothly. |

Val'Dore
PlanetCorp InterStellar
200
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 15:55:00 -
[119] - Quote
You can make more mining Scordite for three hours than you can mining ice for 23 hours.
|

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 16:10:00 -
[120] - Quote
Another reason not to AFK mine like a silly twit... especially in a Talos
KM of AFK miner getting ganked in Halle, a kill I had front-row seats to and got some screenshots for your viewing pleasure You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
107
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 16:11:00 -
[121] - Quote
Ragnarok DDinc wrote:Some people Ice mine when they can't devote a lot of attention to the game but are still on or near their computer IE: Work/School/Homework ect.
I've tried missions and ore mining(doable but annoying) before while doing HW, just doesn't work out as smoothly.
Maybe you should focus on your homework first, and then play EVE. It sounds like you just have a problem with priorities. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Johan Civire
Dirty Curse inc.
188
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 16:20:00 -
[122] - Quote
If you mine you are a zombie or u do it if you like multitasking dont see how people can do this 1 hour long. Let alone 8 hours a day... |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1914
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 18:31:00 -
[123] - Quote
I don't think of it as AFK mining.
I like to think of it as getting paid while posting on these fine forums.
Mr Epeen  There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |

Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
38
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 19:29:00 -
[124] - Quote
You are not looking at the whole picture. First of all there is benefit from flooding the markets with ores and ice, because that means prices will drop. Cheaper POS'es means cheaper Tech II stuff, cheaper research and so on so forth. Cheaper ores mean cheaper ships, the the afk miner drives down prices by not being there, it will benefit him when he is. There are also people who AFK mine for their own consumption, and that should provide some healthy numbers in the books o/ |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1760
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 19:33:00 -
[125] - Quote
Souisa wrote:You are not looking at the whole picture. First of all there is benefit from flooding the markets with ores and ice, because that means prices will drop. Cheaper POS'es means cheaper Tech II stuff, cheaper research and so on so forth. Cheaper ores mean cheaper ships, the the afk miner drives down prices by not being there, it will benefit him when he is. There are also people who AFK mine for their own consumption, and that should provide some healthy numbers in the books Cheaper prices mean new miners get the shaft.
Cheaper prices devalue mining as a profession.
Cheaper prices cheapen the thrill of PVP.
Cheaper prices are not the miners' friend. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

MinefieldS
1 Sick Duck Standss on something
178
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 21:17:00 -
[126] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:
I'm interested in examples of other games with truly compelling mining content.
Any suggestions anybody for where I can gain this perspective of interesting mining in other games?
Stars! In this game you can build mining frigates and corvettes, but the best mining ships are cruisers IMO. Basically you put mining modules on a ship in the editor, build the ship and then you can mine. Then after you've placed your mines any fool that tries to fly through them at warp speed higher than 4 (there are some exceptions) is going to be damaged or blown up to hell depending on the mine strength.
Now, the cruisers are the best for this if you get a special 3-in-1 module that also has mines and bombs from a mysterious trader, because you can send a few cruisers to a low population planet, bomb it to **** and place mines on it so the enemy colonists will get raped when they fly into mines at ridiculous speed. If they fly at warp 4 you can intercept them with those cruisers easily in space. Also mines can decay or be destroyed by lazors, but for huge MinefieldS you need lotsa lazors. There's also a whole mining race with a variety of mines, but I never played it.
Minesweeper You play as a UN dude who's about to get his helmet ventilated; normally you'd drop your gun and run away, but there's a problem. There are huge MinefieldS in front of you and in addition to getting holes in your blue UN helmet you're gonna create jobs for those doctors who use chainsaws. You have to use your smarts in this game to find all the mines, it's very fun.
X-COM You can buy these proximity mines and give them to your evil dudes. Then you put a mine into a hand, activate it and throw it near a door or other tactically important location. Then you wait for the enemy evil dudes to walk over it and BAM! Huge MinefieldS seem like overkill.
RF Online It's a failed korean MMO, but it also has mining. You level an archer/dwarf machine gunner/robot with a gun to like lvl 55 then change your class to a miner. That would take you a few hours if you know what I mean :wink: :wink: Then you buy a lot of mining equipment and go to a mine where people mine ore. You activate stealth/invisibility and place your mining equipment in narrow passes and wait for the enemy miners who actually want to mine to step on it. BAM! No ore for you, motherfather. You get pvp points and race points for these kills too. You can lay huge MinefieldS in this game and with smart placement you can blow up top enemy players too unless they're tanks. Oh and you can AFK mine too, but the mines deactivate after 2 hours or so.
There are many more games with mining but I hope this is enough for you for now. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 21:47:00 -
[127] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Yes they do. The AFK will stop reading here and flame me, but you won't  Although AFK mining will always generate an accounting profit (your ISK quantity goes up), AFK mining is one of the worst activities imaginable for making money. It's the worst but it's better than making zero ISK and it comes with the equivalent effort of staying logged off. So to talk along your line, the opportunity cost of making little ISK with zero effort is more favorable than making zero ISK with zero effort. Not on a macroeconomical scale, it isn't. Devaluing professions through non-stop zero-effort resource uptake is not good for Eve.
You mean like... Oh, no! Have to log my PI alt in but I'm too tired. Tomorrow...
Yeah, Minesweeper is awesome. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
942
|
Posted - 2012.11.17 22:00:00 -
[128] - Quote
This lobbing about miners goes beyond ridiculous. It's simply a witch hunt at all cost by the biggest afk miners in eve against new players/small entities rather than real bots (botters have also all interest on making clean place for their bots at the belt)
Pathetic. brb |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
648
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 01:29:00 -
[129] - Quote
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:This lobbing about miners goes beyond ridiculous. It's simply a witch hunt at all cost by the biggest afk miners in eve against new players/small entities rather than real bots (botters have also all interest on making clean place for their bots at the belt)
Pathetic. Actually, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess it's actually a coordinated campaign, in game and on the forums, to draw attention to the state of mining.
It *IS* stupid boring - whether or not everyone agrees is of course entirely subjective - but there are too many threads popping up too fast to just be *random dude 10,004* complaining about the same thing...
vOv
I could be entirely wrong, but hey, I wouldn't have expected anyone to be able to screw a specific Ice supply up either...
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
2403

|
Posted - 2012.11.18 01:59:00 -
[130] - Quote
Please stay constructive and on topic, thank you.
Moved from EVE General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Grombutz
Treasures Collectors Solar Citizens
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 10:43:00 -
[131] - Quote
Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"? |

Dre'tok Thurr
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 14:05:00 -
[132] - Quote
Waaaaah! Waaaaah! Those mean miners expect me to pay for their minerals and ice. Waaaah!
Wait, I know, I'll gank them and get them back.
Oh, darn, CCP's made it harder (but still not impossible) to gank them? I'd have to actually work a bit at it now? Waaaah!
Oh, and the prices of minerals is going up? Inflation? Must be because there are too many miners! Waaaaah!
Get over your whiny little "wannabe badass" selves. If you don't like mining, here's a clue for you...
DON'T MINE.
Did you miss the clue? I can repeat it.
As for prices on minerals going up, that's because there is more ISK constantly entering the game. As long as ISK enters the game faster than it leaves (and very little leaves, while billions enter every day through NPC bounties, mission rewards and Insurance payments) it will eventually lead to inflation as people who have accumulated more ISK are willing to pay more to get their purchases first.
Ice prices are going down for now? That is because supply is (at least for now) outstripping demand. It is only temporary. The inflation that infests New Eden absolutely will eventually win out at some point.
In the mean time I will continue to mine (AFK or not) when I feel like it and laugh at you moronic fools that clearly have no idea how the game is balanced. You think the devs care about your careful anti-mining rants? They don't, because they know that as much as you rant about the miners, you need them just as they need you. They need you to provide them with a market via your cute little "pew pew" games (awe, look, the cute little nullsec guy blew something up and thinks he's a badass now). You need miners to provide the raw materials to build the replacement for the ship you just blew up and the equipment on that ship.
I love going on the Kill Boards every so often. Not because I give a flying fart whose epeen has grown slightly because they blew up something, but because I look at every one of those destroyed ships and modules and tell myself "Look at the lovely ISK I am about to get paid to mine minerals to replace THAT!" You blow up a freighter with a few billion in items, you get to go stroke your epeen and tell yourself you are "hard core" and you are "playing eve the RIGHT way". I look at that same Kill mail and say "Yay, I see a buy order for a few billion Tritanium coming my way!"
As for motivation, I enjoy making virtual money easily. Could I make more .001'ing in stations? Probably, but I don't want to spend the time dealing with hundreds of others doing the same. Could I make more running missions? Maybe, but a full squadron of miners requires very little effort to net over 100M an hour in minerals. If I were missioning I'd have to actually pay more attention.
As for those that feel that I am making ISK without enough risk, I'd offer you some KY Jelly for your poor hurt butt, but I don't care enough about your whiny complaints to bother. I'm too busy taking YOUR money when your ship gets shot out from under you! Hahaha!
Just realise that we miners hold you wannabe gangsta badass hard core PvPers in every bit as much contempt as you hold us. The only difference is that you pay us to hold you in contempt. Next time you blow up someone's ship, just remember that you've just made our wallets a bit fatter, so we miners are the real winners in your little PvP fight. |

Felicity Love
SIDERION JUMPSHIPS
15
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 14:42:00 -
[133] - Quote
OP, when you're done, shovel this mess up and bring it to my garden compost pile, mmmmmkay ?
At least there it will decay into something useful. Someday.

|

Barakach
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
90
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:18:00 -
[134] - Quote
Grombutz wrote:Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"?
Please list your per account income, not your total. Anyone can purchase 10,000 accounts, multi-box them then claim they make 300m/hour as if it's a great return. |

Darth Gustav
Interwebs Cooter Explosion Fatal Ascension
1772
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:21:00 -
[135] - Quote
Barakach wrote:Grombutz wrote:Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"? Please list your per account income, not your total. Anyone can purchase 10,000 accounts, multi-box them then claim they make 300m/hour as if it's a great return. This does not factor the damage AFK mining does to the value of mining as a profession.
What you can earn right now is immaterial if you are clearly working toward the end goal of effortless supply.
Value = Demand / Supply.
That 300M per hour will eventually turn into 150M per hour with the same number of accounts.
Then 75M.
Then 37.5M.
Give it time and see. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Barakach
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
90
|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:30:00 -
[136] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Barakach wrote:Grombutz wrote:Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"? Please list your per account income, not your total. Anyone can purchase 10,000 accounts, multi-box them then claim they make 300m/hour as if it's a great return. This does not factor the damage AFK mining does to the value of mining as a profession. What you can earn right now is immaterial if you are clearly working toward the end goal of effortless supply. Value = Demand / Supply. That 300M per hour will eventually turn into 150M per hour with the same number of accounts. Then 75M. Then 37.5M. Give it time and see.
What I was going after is I've seen quite a few people claim they can make 300m/day mining, only to find out they have 3 Hulks and an Orca mining for 8 hours or something like that. Then I point out they could make more money by not subbing their extra accounts and just purchase Plex for much less effort.
There are many other ways to measure income for given effort, but this was only one example. |
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1066

|
Posted - 2012.11.18 19:32:00 -
[137] - Quote
Troll removed. ISD Suvetar,-áCaptain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department We are hiring! |
|

Herr Hammer Draken
160
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 09:33:00 -
[138] - Quote
Somebody mentioned opportunity cost early in this thread but missed the connection.
Which is as more players mine ice because they can do it afk, they reduce the amount of mineral mining that is happening. Your mining ships can not be in two places at the same time. As less ships mine minerals the supply shrinks.
The opportunity costs are ice prices drop and mineral prices rise.
And guess what is happeneing in game right now?
Gee! Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

Every One
Omni Galactic Resource Excavation Inc. Tri-Star Galactic Industries
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 10:59:00 -
[139] - Quote
If somebody afk mines, that means they have something better to do. They are just making a bit of ISK while not being active in-game.
For example: I have to WORK. I start afk mining (takes me like 2 minutes to warp to the belt and start mining) then I know that for quite a lot of time I won't have to check on my miner, thus doing work stuff.
Sure it's cheap, but my other choices are the following 1. don't afk mine, do something else instead (L4s, active mine ore, trade, etc) = a lot more isk gained, got fired 2. don't afk mine, don't do anything else instead either = 0 isk gained, did not get fired
Now Mr Economy graduate...tell me what I should do. |

Grombutz
Treasures Collectors Solar Citizens
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 14:16:00 -
[140] - Quote
Barakach wrote:Grombutz wrote:Hum, I make 300 mil/hour with my mining-accounts on Ice, while watching a movie. Ofcourse I have an eye on local, but that's hardly considered active gaming.
If I would do something else instead - I wouldn't be able to get such an income, just because I can't dualbox more than 2 accounts with efficiency.
So, I think ICE is totally worth it :D
Anyway, grinding missions or anoms/plexes is equally boring, so what's the deal with mining Ice "AFK"? Please list your per account income, not your total. Anyone can purchase 10,000 accounts, multi-box them then claim they make 300m/hour as if it's a great return.
Ofcourse I have multiple accounts (6 1/2 mack + Corp-Rorqual) - but this doesn't matter for this topic, because the total income per hour is important in this discussion. ;)
Ofcourse I could make more ISK/H/Account in the same time, but I can handle 7 macks while handling 7 mission/plex-runners is impossible ;)
|

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
426
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 14:51:00 -
[141] - Quote
thread originator prefers the company of gentlemen.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
237
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 20:51:00 -
[142] - Quote
And allow RMT mining bots back into the game? The people asked for this, obviously with big changes CCP can make 100% of its players happy, sometimes the unhappy simply need to adapt and stay away from programing more bots perhaps. |

Priestess Natasha
Southwark Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:58:00 -
[143] - Quote
Wanted to add some variations to the mining types I've experienced in other games. Also what I eventually did to make it suck less.
UO - The Mechanic: You hit the dirt or a mountainside with a pickaxe or a shovel. Travel - Areas depleted quickly so you had to move around. Solution: Eventually scripted with EasyUO, fully automated recalling (teleporting), mining, smelting and storing.
User input required. Medium to high. Script complexity - Medium to high.
SWG - (Pre CU/NGE) The Mechanic: Resources were extracted via machines that needed to be tended once a week or so. The extractors required fuel and cash to run. Travel - Non existant other than planet swapping, or heading out to your field. Again once a week or so to empty them out and refill with fuel. Solution: Slot trade and blanket large areas with heavy extractors on every planet. No macroing or scripting needed.
User input required. Harvesting - Low, Manufacture - High Script complexity - Not used.
Quality of resources changed, so having small farms on single planets generally didn't work too well. There was a limit on the number of harvester machines that one could have per character. Harvester slot trading was done with other players on different servers. It was not uncommon to have harvester fields numbering in the 100's
*** It should be noted that SWG crafting system was far and away the best crafting system ever made in any game at any time. Every item was unique, with unique stats. The skill (and luck) of the crafter, and material quality played an enormous role in the final product.
WoW - The Mechanic: Run around (later on fly around) and pick things up off the ground, or hit them with a pickaxe. Travel - It was very possible to set yourself a path or circuit and just mine/herb all day in one area or until you went insane. Solution - Botted. WoWGlider (MMOGlider) create your own paths and the bot would do it for you. Lootfilter for junk and wake up to bags full of herbs/ore.
User input required - Medium. Script complexity - Medium to high. Fishing was also trivial to script...just FYI.
EVE - The Mechanic: Move to a location and sit there until your bags are full. Empty and repeat. Travel - Non-existant. Solution- Bot it.
User input required. Low Script complexity - Trivial.
I'm a rabid crafter in every game I've ever played...except EVE. Why? It's too dull, even for me. I mean so dull that I can't even be bothered to script it. |

Styth spiting
Ion Corp. NightSong Directorate
89
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 00:05:00 -
[144] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: You see, there is this really cool thing called "implicit cost" also known as opportunity cost. When you do something you give up the chance to do something else. Normally, this is par for the course and totally ok. But AFK ice mining is special.
Apparently you don't understand what AFK (Away From Keyboard) means and don't understand how players are capable of multitasking. Your comparing the idea of mining while doing something else inside our outside of the game to other isk making activities such as running missions, incursions etc, none of which can be done AFK (some can partially be AFK but require players to interact every few minutes, vs 15 - 30 minutes).
Really it is stupid for anyone to do anything in game to generate isk since you could generate more isk / hour working a real job and buying PLEX with real money. So everyone who makes isk in this game is stupid according to you.
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: AFK ice mining is like collecting cans on the street to cash in at an aluminum recycling plant for some nickels. The entry barrier is nonexistent, any moron can do it. This, combined with perfect information (current ice prices are known to all and the locations of ice belts are readily available) means that ice prices are as low as they can possibly be in the market.
No, its like collecting cans while you're on the job doing something else. You assume the person is just collecting cans, but in reality they are collecting cans plus doing something else. That something else could be market stuff, PI, working, watching movies etc. Besides having to do 1 - 2 things per hour the person is able to generate isk while practically not playing the game.
Also why do you care if ice prices are so low? If anything any non-ice mining character would be happy about this. The only reason to be pissed about ice prices is if you're an ice miner yourself.
|

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
2096
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 06:13:00 -
[145] - Quote
I collect cans while walking the dog. I am already walking. I already have bags for collecting things. I don't go walking to collect cans, but I come home with the dog, a bag full of cans and a bag full of doggy doo.
There is no opportunity cost in collecting cans while walking the dog. There is an opportunity lost when I walk the dog and do not collect cans.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |

Greyhound Slarkson
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 13:34:00 -
[146] - Quote
I cannot believe no one mentioned the most well renowned game with mining content in it, that is actually interesting, hell even the name of the game is MINEcraft.
If you consider what makes mining in minecraft different (and arguably more enjoyable) on a metalevel from mining in Eve, one cane see certain differences.
In EvE you know from the beginning of your activities what will happen, you fit your ships for max yield and know exactly how much money you will be making in 3-4 hours of mining.
Mining in Minecraft is closer to exploration in EvE in that respect, you go out and have no idea what you will find, you will fill your pockets with crap and when you happen to find a diamond/deadspace item you rejoice.
Regarding the risk, you can basically ignore EvE rats, and just look at gankers just like creepers. They turn up out of nowwhere if you are not paying attention to your surroundings and blow you up, which will loose you your valuable loot.
The only real point that makes Minecraft mining more interesting than EvE mining, would be that element of luck. Even if you fill your pockets with cobblestone you rationalize that time spent as well spent if at the end of the day you find 4 diamonds.
Therefore I would suggest giving mining a very small chance of finding higher end ores, or other rather valuable stuff. People are stupid and will rationalize their time spent mining worthless veldspar if they find some expensive item in the meantime, even if it increases their isk/hr by a very small margin.
One could even put in a mechanic that works like fishing in Minecraft, where something pops up on your display while mining and if you activate the "special stuff laser" on your mining ship during that time, you get the chance for the high value item. Thereby still making afk mining possible, but rewarding it if you also are at the keyboard.
|

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
266
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 15:06:00 -
[147] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Accurate but completely one sided close minded comment.
You are correct from a certain point of view but you miss on big piece of the puzzle.
AFK miners do not mine when they could be doing something else. It is an activity that is done when the account would otherwise not even be logged in.
There are players who will play on one account and have other accounts set up to AFK mine while they are busy on there main account. Other will have there accounts AFK mining while they ARE AT WORK AND CAN NOT PLAY. Others still use bot programs to run the mining ops for hours with zero interaction.(this is illegal but hard to prove or get caught at.)
There is no scenario where these afk accounts could be making more money, as the player can not be ATK for any other activity on that account. It is AFK mine for a little isk or make no isk at all off that account. Any amount of isk not matter how small is a positive. it cost the player nothing unless they are ganked.
The argument about this activity getting to a point where returns are so low they can not even cover the cost of a PLEX is irrelevant. Most of these accounts are subbed for other purposes and only used to afk mine when not being used for there intended purpose. Again any income from AFK mining is a bonus as the alternative is making zero isk not doing other more profitable activities.
AFK mining is really only done for mining ice. normal mining can not be left to run on its own for more than a couple minutes without a bot program.
So what impact does this really have on the game? Well ice mining is pointless to do ATK as the income is so low, but it is also the most boring activity in the game, so no loss there. It also keeps ice prices down. This directly results in fuel costs of running POSes and capital ships being kept down. A positive effect as far as I am concerned. Considering that most AFK ice miners are research or production alts that often work out of POSes this activity keeping ICE value down has far less impact than simply making less off the ice they sell. They also receive the benefit of their POSes costing less to run. So this isk they lose from low sell prices of the ice is made back from reduced cost to run their POSes.
There really is no major negative impact on the game from AFK mining. A lot of players hate it, but it does keep prices down. When I mine it is never ATK, but generally semi-AFK. If I have the time to devote to the game then I spend it doing far higher isk/hr activities than mining. But when I am busy doing other things I often have my miners working away in the back ground, I am technically at the key board but engaged in activities outside of EVE. I mine enough ice, and bring in enough PI materials to not only keep my POS running, but have extra blocks to sell off. It takes me two weeks to generate two months of fuel.
My fuel blocks manufacturing I consider a semi-AFK passive income. It takes very little time and effort to accomplish, and can be done at times when I can not devote enough attention to the game to conduct any higher isk/hr activities. |

Mouse-Fitzgerald en Cedoulain
en Cedoulain Trade and Freight
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.23 07:46:00 -
[148] - Quote
As a relative novice, it is amazing even to me that this argument still takes place. This might be relevant if the people AFK mining were actually thinking about doing anything else, but sure, yeah, if you're mining AFK that means you can't do other things on that character . How observant of you. I learned what opportunity cost means in 5th grade too. |

Joanna RB
JoJo Industries n Shipbreakers
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 00:07:00 -
[149] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:Eventually you devalue the gatherable resources enough that it doesn't matter though. Given the last thing CCP did to "fix" mining (the introduction of the ridiculously tanked barges), I don't expect anything to be seriously done about mining in the future. I've written a blog post about my ideal changes to mining that will still allow the AFKers to ply their trade while rewarding active players.
Please no. That blog suggests moving roids to grav sites. Scan Players already have far too game content to play with - wormholes, complexes, hacking/archaology sites, and combat probe PVP for example. So why make mining yet another goody that only Scan Players can access? A lot of people hate moving circles around on a star map while flying blind with a cloaked ship that is utterly useless at anything else other than scanning, why should they be forced into exploration? If you dont like mining, incursions, factional warfare, epic arcs, 0.0 warfare, POS building, trading, lowsec - you can avoid them and still have plenty of content in the game to play with. Moving more and more stuff under the horror blanket of exploration so you miss out on half the game if you are not a Scan Player is detrimental. Also it will screw new players - with a maxed out T2 exploration frigate, SOE probe launcher, and SOE probes, you can easily spend 20-30 minutes scanning several systems before coming across a grav site, then another 3-4 mins to actually scan it down to warpable. A new player who wants to mine, with naff all exploration skills in an unbonused ship with bog standard probes will spend well over an hour before even finding a roid! |

Invictra Atreides
Toward the Terra
98
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 02:52:00 -
[150] - Quote
I like mining.
Such an simple answer to this question. But then again its a question with multiple answers. Blog |-áTutorials | Youtube "I donGÇÖt know everything, I just know what I know." |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |