Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries R-I-P
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:38:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
So in other words, you are not going to launch half-finished, half-baked, bug riddled content?? And instead lauched polished content?
No complaints here..... I am a Pod Pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1109/Hostile-Takeover-by-Marek-Okon[1].jpg
|
|

CCP Solomon
C C P C C P Alliance
38

|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:41:00 -
[92] - Quote
Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed  Associate Technical Producer - Carbon |
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:44:00 -
[93] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote: Honestly, I think the whole concept of incarna was wrong. CCP repeatedly stated that there would be no combat involved like FPS-style killing sprees. Considering that the majority of eve players go great lenghts just to blow stuff up and watch shiny ships go boom I find it hard to believe that any of them would find a "pacifistic" environment for their avatars enjoyable. If CCP wants the players to accept WiS, it will not work without combat.
Which is an illusion created by current PVP shoutbox, because there are a lot of people enjoying other parts of EVE. Like the ones constructing said shiny space ships or the ones mining the stuff to build shiny space ships or those who like to explore more than to shoot spaceships and the glorious CSM did nothing for them.
I do like the open PVP approach EVE takes, but blowing up spaceships sincerly is not all.
A few years ago there were many initiatives around EVE that were quite good and player organized events. Lately the talk has been all around pew-pew. If I want pew-pew ONLY I play Lost4Dead or one of the other shooters I have installed.
EVE used to be an intelligent game that made you think out of the box.
Now go kiss some lower backs in 0-Sec, k? |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:47:00 -
[94] - Quote
Well, i actually hoped for the establishments, because i thought they are almost done already.
Tbh, i was really forward looking to the games CCP presented at the last fanfest.
That said ... i'm glad that you finally extend and fix the simulation again. :)
WHERE'S MY SHINY ????????!!!!!!! :D *lol*
Also, if you want to add content to the quarter, ADD MINIGAMES AND A WAY WE CAN PLAY AGAINST EACHOTHER, MAYBE ON THE BIG SCREEN OR HOWEVER !
THINK ! ABOUT ! IT !
:)
I KNOW there are plenty of people not caring about this, but i also know there are quite some people who'd enjoy it. :)
Like ... myself. Gimme a chess. checkers. go. TIC-TAC-TOE ! :)
That strange game you've shown on fanfest, which took place in the establishment, I REALLY WANT TO LAY MY HANDS ON THIS ONE !!! *lol*
I promise, people will like it ! :) (unless your games crappy, but you can't fail much at chess, for example. ^^) |

Juil
Phoenix Industries Pty. Ltd.
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:49:00 -
[95] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed 
Why so you can promise more stuff and then 'push it away' when you miss your deadlines?
Since 2006 you have been promising Ambulation as it was back then, then the last 2 fan fests you've been hyping about incarna.. you've told us that we would finally be given the keys to the station that we could interact in a avatar.. that we could leave the ship and start to explore the OTHER side of eve.. and that you would be giving us the tools to make what we wished of it...
Now your saying sorry summer expansion was a big aprils fools joke.. and once again we are not finishing and deliviering on what we have promsied.
And yes I know people are going to flame me for this but I was looking forward to Incarna in it's full not for what it is at the moment.. but for what it promised.. Making more of the EVE SANDBOX into an actual SANDBOX. I love my Space Ships, but I also love being able to escape from that reality and Incarna if it was anything like they had hyped on about at fanfest would have given you something akin to what Second Life has managed.. only with better content and better graphics.
People seem to think that because there is no 'actual' solid game play defined by CCP that sorry it's not a feature.. but that's the point, Eve is not meant to be 'this is how you play, this is what you do and that is that' Eve is meant to be a Sandbox, it's meant to be 'here are the tools, go and make the game play you want'... and Incarna had the hint of that finally TRUELY becoming something.. from being able to put tattoo's all over my Avatar's body, to making an establishment to finally maybe making all those worthless dancers I have useful etc..
It had the possiblity of opening up entire new Industrial area's for those who are Industrialists... manufacturing entire new sets of items for the AVATAR side of the game..
and yet instead we got NeX and now we get yet another dropped expansion.. half finished and from CCP's track record.. never to BE finished.
Thanks for lieing for the past several years CCP.. and for getting peoples hopes up at a fantastic feature only to again scrap it. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
106
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:50:00 -
[96] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
your stuff, contract it to me in Jita 4-4. Anyone who is blue to DRF are cowards and have failed Eve.
MM Bombers, Best Bombers |

Tristan North
The Scope
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:13:00 -
[97] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
your stuff, contract it to me in Jita 4-4.
Just +1 who wrote it before you, after you read it 2 times it becomes irritating.
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:21:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed 
To kick some lower backs? I have real legs... ;) But you can buy me a beer at fanfest and I might forgive you the troll post. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:23:00 -
[99] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Well, that sucks. I guess Ill be back when you guys get serious about avatar gameplay. Ive only been waiting 3 years (or whatever). I'm going to go wait somewhere else. CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this. |

Ni Cho
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:33:00 -
[100] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I am all for this Incarna stuff people complained about CCP not doing for many years before I even played Eve Online: a sometimes crappy game. I am glad to see the space ship crap being worked on, since you know, I am a starship captain and all that crap.
Just make sure you roll out that Incarna crap right and with **** people can do, maybe even with out blowing up our computers... 
I want my Sexual Enhancement shop to be of the same high quality as the ding dongs I will be peddling.
But I want spaceship crap to be right/nice/fixed/cool FIRST. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:42:00 -
[101] - Quote
Ni Cho wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I am all for this Incarna stuff people complained about CCP not doing for many years before I even played Eve Online: a sometimes crappy game. I am glad to see the space ship crap being worked on, since you know, I am a starship captain and all that crap. Just make sure you roll out that Incarna crap right and with **** people can do, maybe even with out blowing up our computers...  I want my Sexual Enhancement shop to be of the same high quality as the ding dongs I will be peddling. But I want spaceship crap to be right/nice/fixed/cool FIRST.
You said crap more often than I said lower backs today while meaning arse! I salute you, Goon.
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:44:00 -
[102] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote: Well, that sucks. I guess Ill be back when you guys get serious about avatar gameplay. Ive only been waiting 3 years (or whatever). I'm going to go wait somewhere else. CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this.
My thoughts are pretty similar. The only decision for me is as to whether I stay subscribed and just train skills or just quit until CCP finally delivers something worth coming back for. I might give it a week or so to see what the upcoming Dev blogs promise.
Personally I would love some sort of statement from CCP on what Incarna will actually contain, merely so I have something to look forward to, and work towards being ready for. As opposed to this endless c**k tease. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
89
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:51:00 -
[103] - Quote
CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:53:00 -
[104] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
Stay Classy |

Zenethian
The Jagged Edge Ushra'Khan
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:53:00 -
[105] - Quote
I have always been opposed to the very idea of Incarna. Eve at it's core is an internet spaceships game.
If you wanna walk around in a space station, go get a SecondLife account.
I was really worried that Incarna was going to become the focus of Eve's development. I was considering cancelling my accounts because of it. However, with this latest news, I will be keeping my accounts, and maybe even adding a new one.
TL;DR: Accounts subbed! |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:54:00 -
[106] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:58:00 -
[107] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know?
Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list.
CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:58:00 -
[108] - Quote
Zenethian wrote:I have always been opposed to the very idea of Incarna. Eve at it's core is an internet spaceships game.
If you wanna walk around in a space station, go get a SecondLife account.
I was really worried that Incarna was going to become the focus of Eve's development. I was considering cancelling my accounts because of it. However, with this latest news, I will be keeping my accounts, and maybe even adding a new one.
TL;DR: Accounts subbed!
WIS and FIS are not mutually exclusive |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:01:00 -
[109] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path.
LOL - You did read my earlier doubts on avatar geeks working on FiS stuff, right? There is no "priority FiS or WiS" I think. They use the FiS shouters so they can.. Ah, I give up. Search for my earlier posts. I'm tired. |

Vanilla Twilight
Your Slit is Mine Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:01:00 -
[110] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know?
CCP must bring NEW content that have something to do with what EVE IS, a space fuckin ship game, not The Sims online. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:03:00 -
[111] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path. LOL - You did read my earlier doubts on avatar geeks working on FiS stuff, right? There is no "priority FiS or WiS" I think. They use the FiS shouters so they can.. Ah, I give up. Search for my earlier posts. I'm tired.
Like i asked you on another thread.. have you got any idea about how feature development works? Or do you think its only Team A do this and Team B do that.. then you get everything together and bundle into one expansion? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path.
Without having access to the subscription data I can only assume you are correct, as CCP seems to agree with you. I am not as upset with the direction of the game as I am this continued bait and switch. CCP has for years given us the impression that WIS was just around the corner and it seems, just as we are about to arrive, the rug is pulled out from under us again. |

Tristan North
The Scope
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:04:00 -
[113] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
That's just what they want you to believe untill WiS is complete. |

Afale II
Space Pony Farm
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:07:00 -
[114] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
So Incarna became another half finished and abandoned project. And no i don't think there will be a multiplayer part for Incarna ever.
You just **** off one part of the playerbase to please the other. This flip flopping won't work. FFS just one time finish the Project before you beginn another. -Nostalgia is not as good as it used to be- |

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:07:00 -
[115] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say.
Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game.
Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles.
I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations.
I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:11:00 -
[116] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say. Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game. Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles. I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations.
http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.html
Incarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
49
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:11:00 -
[117] - Quote
Finishing Establishments by Winter was very unlikely, and everyone should have known better by the time the CQ launch was pushed so far back to be a WINTER expansion when it was implicated to be a late Incarna expansion addition.
Establishments are more than just the structures.
Establishments for EVE represents the following :
Player owned station rooms, 100% customizable establishments, UI to manage customized establishments (including scripting NPCs), mutliple establishments per station, multi-player environment supporting undefined number of players, mini-games (poker, etc), Scripted NPC's, Stripper NPC actions and "clothing", social "drinking", functional environments, emotional animations (smile, sad, angry, wave), interactive environments, a concourse(??) to move between establishments, new boosters, booster trading mechanics in establishments only, player policed booster smuggling, new "local" channel, and the list goes on and on and on for establishments.
All of that is NOT getting done by winter. It's a fact, it's way too much and rushing it is just going to make it crapola. Establishments might seem like a simple addition, but really it's a whole content package that is going to be really challenging to get right, and they have ONE SHOT to do it right, so they better hit it on the head the first time.
I wish it were coming this WInter, but the fact is it just isn't. NOSTRO AURUM NON EST AURUM VULGI |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:12:00 -
[118] - Quote
Afale II wrote:You just **** off one part of the playerbase to please the other. This flip flopping won't work. FFS just one time finish the Project before you beginn another.
Well said. This should concern not just fans disappointed that WIS is pushed back, but all the people that are happy FIS is now priority have to wonder: For how long? How long until CCP flip flops back the other way without finishing FIS projects. |

Equto
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:14:00 -
[119] - Quote
I assume ccp is working / has been working on the minigames, would it be too much to ask for the simple ones to be added to our quarters so that we can atleast see what you had in mind without taking staff from anywhere else as the minigames should already be finished( you did show them at fanfest) |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:ONE SHOT to do it right, so they better hit it on the head the first time.
I wish it were coming this WInter, but the fact is it just isn't.
I agree with what your saying. The problem isn't the reality, its how CCP has pimped WIS for 5 years and the expectations set forth.
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |