Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
It was my understanding that Establishments were slated for the Winter 2011 Expansion, but going by this Devblog, I see no mention of Establishments in the upcoming Expansion any more, when it was promised multiple times in the past.
So, I'd like a simple yes or no (or SOMETHING, anything.), are Establishments coming with the next Expansion? |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
219
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Would you accept no for an answer without making an issue about it ?
|

Mersault
The Pie Factory
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Establishments, like pies, take a good deal of preperation. They need time to rest before they are good to go. |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
29
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 13:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Would you accept no for an answer without making an issue about it ? Yes, I'd just like to know if they're coming or not. The idea of Incarna (WiS at the time.) is what got me into EVE. I was really excited to know that Establishments were coming this Winter, now I'd just like to know if I should still be excited for them or not. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
136
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would like to answer this question with a definate: Mmmnoyermaybe? - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Alua Oresson
The Dominion of Light BLACK-MARK
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
From Zulu
Quote:I want to make it clear that this is not a final list. As we go through design and implementation phases some things may require more work than initially expected and others may not hold water in the design phase and therefore may not make it into this particular expansion. Similarly some things might get added to the list. We will keep you updated on our progress every step of the way because, as Hilmar said, communication is one of the things we are dedicated to improve.
Emphasis is mine.
However, I would not be holding my breath. Incarna was initially supposed to release with all four CQ's. They are just getting around to releasing the other three. I would assume the art assets are quite a bit behind. Wouldn't expect to see Establishments until around the summer expansion actually. |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Alua Oresson wrote:From Zulu Quote:I want to make it clear that this is not a final list. As we go through design and implementation phases some things may require more work than initially expected and others may not hold water in the design phase and therefore may not make it into this particular expansion. Similarly some things might get added to the list. We will keep you updated on our progress every step of the way because, as Hilmar said, communication is one of the things we are dedicated to improve.
Emphasis is mine. However, I would not be holding my breath. Incarna was initially supposed to release with all four CQ's. They are just getting around to releasing the other three. I would assume the art assets are quite a bit behind. Wouldn't expect to see Establishments until around the summer expansion actually. I read that, and I understand. I just found that the fact they said Establishments were coming this expansion, then them not appearing on that list, was kind of odd. You'd think something that was promised is coming would already be on that list.
So, of course, now I doubt they are. I'd just like a definite answer.
Really, the moment I read that CCP was "reorganizing" internally, I figured Establishments weren't coming and that (maybe) these fixes are easier to achieve than actually pushing out Establishments, so CCP took the easy road to pleasing the mass whiners on the forums and used this whole thing as a cover for "we won't have Establishments ready by December, so lets do something easier and say we're listening to people. Win-win." buuuuut.. That's just me speculating on the internal workings of CCP.
Honestly, I just want a "yes" or "no" so I know what I'm waiting for. |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Also, I'd like to point out that that "not a final list" is almost certainly there so when they remove something at the last minute, people can't say that the list was supposed to be a definite thing, I honestly doubt anything will be added.
Ugh, I'm starting to hate my posts. I'm becoming anti-CCP :/ |

Mia Restolo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
I'll go with no. Considering it's taken them months to get 3 new rooms to the test server I would expect interactive multiplayer environments to show up around the winter 2015 expansion. |

Calipygian
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mystic5hadow wrote:Also, I'd like to point out that that "not a final list" is almost certainly there so when they remove something at the last minute, people can't say that the list was supposed to be a definite thing, I honestly doubt anything will be added.
Ugh, I'm starting to hate my posts. I'm becoming anti-CCP :/ They can hedge their bets all they want, but no MMO dev is ever let off the hook because they used non-comittal language. MMO fans tend to harsly punish and endlessly bring up any "promise" devs fail to deliver on. Not mentioning something they'd like to get in but aren't pretty confident about is a good strategy in my opinion. |
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Well, I'm certainly not that much anti-CCP, but I was very much looking forward to WiS myself, even though I played the game for many years just being a spaceship.
And I agree with your estimation: They figured out: "Phew, Incarna is harder to do than we thought. Luckily we have a bunch of loud 0.0 whiners in the backyard! Lets please them, even though nothing will actually change for them in game. And say we listened to players, even though they only represent a very small percentage of playerbase."
Then the CCP Genius Handshake Award was presented to someone. |

flakeys
The Great cornholio's Paper Tiger Coalition
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Mystic5hadow wrote: I just found that the fact they said Establishments were coming this expansion, then them not appearing on that list, was kind of odd. You'd think something that was promised is coming would already be on that list.
You do know how long us oldtimers waited on WIS while it was promised to come soontm?I'd think next summer earliest to expect any big new content to the WIS so keep your hopes low is my advice , if you can't enjoy eve without the WIS then you've joined the wrong game imho.IT's there as a sideshow for the main game.
|

Iohet Nolafew
Star Frontiers BricK sQuAD.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:24:00 -
[13] - Quote
Based on the other dev blog, I'm willing to bet establishments are going to come when they're done, rather than rushing a half finished product out, which bit them in the ass already this year. So I'd guess no. |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
33
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:30:00 -
[14] - Quote
flakeys wrote:Mystic5hadow wrote: I just found that the fact they said Establishments were coming this expansion, then them not appearing on that list, was kind of odd. You'd think something that was promised is coming would already be on that list.
You do know how long us oldtimers waited on WIS while it was promised to come soontm?I'd think next summer earliest to expect any big new content to the WIS so keep your hopes low is my advice , if you can't enjoy eve without the WIS then you've joined the wrong game imho.IT's there as a sideshow for the main game. I've only been waiting since 2008, it's not that I can't enjoy EVE without it, it's the fact that CCP always promises stuff then doesn't deliver. Now it was just the ultimate tease to me, as Incarna is something I'm really excited for, they kept saying that Establishments are coming this Winter, we already have CQ teasing us, and now it seems CCP has dropped Establishment from this Winter. Which, for all I know, may not be the case as we all know CCP isn't very good at being clear about everything, but if that is the case then I am severely disappointed. It's the solitary thing I have been waiting for, the rest has just been bonuses to me, and now that it seemed it was finally arriving.. CCP decides to focus on the stuff those-with-the-loudest-mouths (or clickiest-keys? I dunno, lol) complained about.
I will always love EVE, regardless if Establishments come this Winter or not. Though I may be disappointed if they aren't coming any time soon, I will still play and enjoy EVE... Unless they pull this again, then I dunno, I'd probably be really pissed by then. |

Alxea
U-208 Bacon Fortress Gaming Syndicate
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
I think they were delayed thanks to the playerbase moaning and I was looking forward to the bars and trophy rooms. :( |

Herold Oldtimer
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iohet Nolafew wrote:Based on the other dev blog, I'm willing to bet establishments are going to come when they're done, rather than rushing a half finished product out, which bit them in the ass already this year. So I'd guess no.
I agree with this, both the release date and what they will be hopefully releasing.
I have no problem waiting till they feel confident enough to give us something good.
|

Tristan North
The Scope
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
Mystic5hadow wrote:"We won't have Establishments ready by December, so lets do something easier and say we're listening to people. Win-win." This. |

Jokerface666
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
Are going to make a new post every 3 hrs if you do not get an answer??
Ffs some official write "no" please ------------------------------w00t w00t rapetrain------------------------------ |

Alua Oresson
The Dominion of Light BLACK-MARK
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
The squeeky wheel gets the grease. However, I think that this refocus of their time is well spent. They are still working on WIS. And I do believe they will have something out in about a year. However, I am excited that the actual core gameplay is being addressed. These are items that have plagued the game for years. I'm all for fixing the game before you add more stuff to it. |

Mystic5hadow
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
36
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Alua Oresson wrote:The squeeky wheel gets the grease. However, I think that this refocus of their time is well spent. They are still working on WIS. And I do believe they will have something out in about a year. However, I am excited that the actual core gameplay is being addressed. These are items that have plagued the game for years. I'm all for fixing the game before you add more stuff to it. I'm happy they're working on FiS, I just wish they would have finished up with Establishments at least before switching to focus on WiS, rather than cutting off WiS and potentially upsetting players (like myself) that were actually excited and waiting for WiS stuff.
They should have just made their intention clear like so "Folks, we know you want FiS stuff, so let us just finish up what we're working on for WiS right now so we don't **** off people waiting for the WiS stuff we promised, then we'll get right to this FiS stuff you want, okay? Okay."
That would have made me perfectly happy. |
|

mechtech
SRS Industries SRS.
31
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 14:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
FiS is the priority of the winter expansion, I can guarantee there won't be establishments in it. We don't even have the 3 other captains quarters yet, so obviously the art assets for establishments are not yet done. As for the multiplayer networking for player avatars, I bet that's still in development as well.
If I were to guess, judging by my 10+ expansions that I've seen CCP roll out over the years, I'd say that winter will have the other captains quarters, the expansion after will let you invite other people to your room (and have a few other WiS features), and the expansion after will have the first iteration of establishments.
To be frank, Incarna had no content, Tyrannis was a minigame, and Dominion was a failure. The last good (and man was it good) expansion that we had was Apocrypha 1.5 years ago, so CCP has a ton of catching up to do to ensure that players have a reason to play the game. They took verbal flak, and CCP has recently started to lose a fair share of subscribers. The next 2 expansions will almost certainly be centered around engaging gameplay content. |

Ilkahn
United Aerospace Co-op
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
Agreed, when i found this game i found it to be completely awesome when i started. It still is, but they need to address the things they have not finished yet. I can say that from when i started about 1.75 years ago the game has changed a great deal, it also seems to have broken some things along the way, especially where it concerns ship balancing (namely the gallente ships). It's terrible game mechanics when the minmatar are referred to as the "Winmatar" and all new players are heartily urged to abandon their racial heritage in favor of the FOTM. Even the caldari known to be the favored class for PVE with the EWAR owneveryone PVP ships overshadow the gallente... sigh.
I must give them absolute kudos though on the best game i've ever played even despite it's flaws. They truly aren't doing a bad job, and it's not the indians at the desk fault for the issues. Hilmars letter, sincere or not (however you feel about it) steps up and accepts the blame for the issues. The desk jockeys that put this code together for us are simply doing what they are told, they don't get to write their own checks so let's not smash them upside the head to much.
Good Job CCP, you can do it better than the rest, now give us the great game it is. And yes, i personally want the WiS. I want a freaking lazor gun, and i want to shoot that cheating scum of a player at the card table that wins my isk...  |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:08:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lets see at the changes planned and then lets think how this could possibly hinder them to continue with WiS, if they felt committed:
Hybrid weapons balancing --> Takes some math genius as a ressource. Factional warfare --> mostly quest scripters I guess. Assault ships --> Math genius again. Capital ship balancing --> Mr Math again New T2 modules --> Some icon designer & Mr Math Starbase logistics management --> see above New EWAR-Drones --> see above T2 Rigs manufacturing --> see above Ship spinning --> done... New font --> done More captains quarters --> Done. These are the people working on Incarna and WOD. I highly doubt they need much time from the rest. Time dilation --> Genius progger and database admin.
So: Mainly it is probably about progress not being fast enough in the Incarna team. The rest is mostly an excuse.
Also, will the above really change much for FiS?
0.0 is supposed to be a lawless place were large groups of players can carve out their own empires and then defend them constantly. It should be a place where you're constantly at war and on your toes. Now... Will the above changes really change much to improve that feeling?
Low Sec is supposed to be a haven for pirates. Do I get extra-Tortuga feeling out of those changes?
Factional Warfare theoretically could be interesting. In the end I'm sure you get a few more missions and perhaps two stations or so.
The rest are small changes. |

DickbeardThePirate
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:09:00 -
[24] - Quote
If you're more concerned about not getting WiS content then you are pleased by the promise of FiS improvements, I would like to kindly ask you to get out.
The future vision trailer was why I resubscribed to eve at the start of the year, but even I can see that that content is far far far less important then refining the game as it currently is. Hilmar's latest devblog has reassured me that I am not wasting my (or someone elses) money. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:12:00 -
[25] - Quote
DickbeardThePirate wrote:If you're more concerned about not getting WiS content then you are pleased by the promise of FiS improvements, I would like to kindly ask you to get out.
The future vision trailer was why I resubscribed to eve at the start of the year, but even I can see that that content is far far far less important then refining the game as it currently is. Hilmar's latest devblog has reassured me that I am not wasting my (or someone elses) money.
Talking to me? If you would be able to read thoroughly, you would see that I think they could do both at the same time? |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Lets see at the changes planned and then lets think how this could possibly hinder them to continue with WiS, if they felt committed:
Factional warfare --> mostly quest scripters I guess.
I could pick on a lot more but this alone shows up you have zero idea about what you're talking about.
When you genuinely don't have a clue its a lot more intelligent to keep silent than prove you have no idea at all.
Something you may want to consider in future - I would recommend it to you. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
Yes, it is always funny to see the huge number of geniuses on this forum humbling me so efficiently. I will now crawl back into my cave, embarassed by all the genius your postings on this forum usually express. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Yes, it is always funny to see the huge number of geniuses on this forum humbling me so efficiently. I will now crawl back into my cave, embarassed by all the genius your postings on this forum usually express.
Nobody genuinely in FW gives a toss about PVE.
The fact you don't know that but still feel the need to tell us all what you think requires doing in development terms speaks volumes.
Oh and sarcasm won't help. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:28:00 -
[29] - Quote
I know what many of you want. You want meaningful FW, as in: Your actions will affect the game universe for other players and the FW players.
That would actually make me join you. But I doubt you get that on the scale you want it, sarcasm aside.
Also, it wasn't my point. My point was avatar and station designers will likely not be needed to improve FW and the other things on the list, so it is likely just an excuse by CCP because said avatar & station designers cannot deliver in time.
And I'm surprised: I thought next you'd tell me you are one of the thousands of game designers on this forum. Perhaps you are not as bad as I thought. |

Denaris Aschanna
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
*sighs* Time to type my post again as the forum decided to eat the last one..
While it's a good thing that FiS is getting some love, I really, REALLY hope CCP finish Incarna first. I remember reading that the other CQ's and multiplayer establishments were just about finished, and I'd hate for WiS to be pushed by the wayside at the last minute and become just another unfinished feature. I, and a lot of other people, have been eagerly awaiting the time when we can finally climb out of our pods and stretch our legs.
I mean, FiS has had content since 2003! That's 8 YEARS of Spaceship content. Is it really that selfish to want WiS?
|
|

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:38:00 -
[31] - Quote
No I don't think anyone really expects anything much from any FW "revamp".
What most of us would like is an end to the exploits - even when CCP say they aren't, because it takes too long to fix.
Example - I can have an alt in the Amarr FW corp rep me in the Minnie FW corp while fighting the Amarr FW corp.
He receives no standing hit but should anyone on the Amarr side shoot him then they take a BIG faction standing hit.
I'm quite happy for it to be possible to rep someone in the opposing faction but it should have consequences. It doesn't.
Now we know CCP CAN fix this nonsense because they fixed something very similar in Incursions so its not beyond the wit of man (or Icelander). The question is will they?
That's just the tip of the iceberg regarding FW.
What you're talking about is flipping systems - won't happen IMHO as it will put players off trying it. Having your "stuff" in a station you can't dock in is null-sec sov gaming, not FW.
See what I mean about not understanding  |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
10
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 15:53:00 -
[32] - Quote
I wouldn't go so far to flip whole stations or systems. That definitely would unbalance the game. But to be able to flip some targets, e.g. some radar station and it gives your faction a meaningful "we achieved something" experience and a bonus to e.g. scanning for enemies in that system. Just an example
That - or similar things - were the loud clamour that many wanted for FW.
You still miss the point of my earlier post though - oblivous to FW problems as I might be: Do you think the people that can correct that bug are the same ones that create avatars and station interiours or textures and mashes and so on?
|

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
63
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Establishments need content. Given the blogs I think we will not see them until there is content. Otherwise they would just be a fashion show. Content CCP has talked about is gambling, and contraband.
Contraband needs new FiS content as well so player enforcers can try and stop player smugglers.
Multi-player environments, gambling, and all the contraband stuff needs programmers, so it may be hard to fit it in with the other stuff on the list.
But it would be nice for CCP to tell us: Establishments this winter: On the list? Off the list? Or a solid maybe? CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 16:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
The OP must not have been paying much attention to the forums these past few months 
Slade
|

Oberine Noriepa
107
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 17:16:00 -
[35] - Quote
While I do not mind the refocus to improving the spaceship aspect of the game, I do hope that the Incarna portions get fleshed out. I think, at this point, it's obvious that the more ambitious content of Incarna is unfinished, and that CCP would rather not release an unfinished product again unless they're willing to receive the same backlash they received this summer. (Doubtful.)
On top of this, when are those new nebulae coming out? |
|

CCP Solomon
C C P C C P Alliance
20

|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:07:00 -
[36] - Quote
Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Associate Technical Producer - Carbon |
|

Khira Kitamatsu
197
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:11:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. Ponies!-á We need more ponies! |

Jack bubu
GK inc. Pandemic Legion
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:13:00 -
[38] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Was the right decision to make, FiS is more pressing right now :)
Also glad you are only delaying it and not scrapping it. |

Janos Saal
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote: That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
bye then EVE is dead |

Alex Sinai
Mining And Probing Specialists
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
That is what i needed to hear. Alts created and friends invited to EVE! :-) |
|

LawlSTi
The Imperial Fedaykin
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
See yah! |

Grateler
The People's Liberation Front of Offugen
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:15:00 -
[42] - Quote
Mystic5hadow wrote:flakeys wrote:Mystic5hadow wrote: I just found that the fact they said Establishments were coming this expansion, then them not appearing on that list, was kind of odd. You'd think something that was promised is coming would already be on that list.
You do know how long us oldtimers waited on WIS while it was promised to come soontm?I'd think next summer earliest to expect any big new content to the WIS so keep your hopes low is my advice , if you can't enjoy eve without the WIS then you've joined the wrong game imho.IT's there as a sideshow for the main game. I've only been waiting since 2008, it's not that I can't enjoy EVE without it, it's the fact that CCP always promises stuff then doesn't deliver. Now it was just the ultimate tease to me, as Incarna is something I'm really excited for, they kept saying that Establishments are coming this Winter, we already have CQ teasing us, and now it seems CCP has dropped Establishment from this Winter. Which, for all I know, may not be the case as we all know CCP isn't very good at being clear about everything, but if that is the case then I am severely disappointed. It's the solitary thing I have been waiting for, the rest has just been bonuses to me, and now that it seemed it was finally arriving.. CCP decides to focus on the stuff those-with-the-loudest-mouths (or clickiest-keys? I dunno, lol) complained about. I will always love EVE, regardless if Establishments come this Winter or not. Though I may be disappointed if they aren't coming any time soon, I will still play and enjoy EVE... Unless they pull this again, then I dunno, I'd probably be really pissed by then.
The majority of complaints recently have been because people dont want Incarna and want CCP to concentrate on spaceships.
The reality is that all this work on Incarna was going to result in very little gameplay, all Ive heard is smuggling and gambling, both of which seem to be minigames at best.
As confirmed above it wont be appearing anytime soon which is good news as I just dont see what it would have added and when the door opened and there was little to do there would have been further justified uproar. |

Written Word
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:15:00 -
[43] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
You put those last two dev blogs in perspective. Thank you.
You didn't say you would focus on spaceships because you love your customers and value their feedback, you said it because your walking in stations project is a complete and utter disaster |

KhaelaMensha Khaine
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Written Word wrote:You didn't say you would focus on spaceships because you love your customers and value their feedback, you said it because your walking in stations project is a complete and utter disaster
Actually Hellmar said BOTH. Why do people want to hate on CCP for ANY reason whatsover? Do you think it's cool. They messed up big time and they've admitted it - which is rare enough - so why don't you accept the apology in the spirit it was given.
Some people are never happy.
Mystic5hadow wrote: The idea of Incarna (WiS at the time.) is what got me into EVE.
There's your problem right there. You started playing based on the promise of future gameplay rather than the actual current gameplay. Here's a tip - don't play a game unless you don't enjoy it 'as it is'.
Incarna will hopefully add a lot to EvE but we don't want it and frankly we don't need it, until "it's done". If you and the other WIS fanbois can't handle that then well - you know where the door is. :) |

Grateler
The People's Liberation Front of Offugen
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:16:00 -
[45] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
Lol, why cancel over functionality that has never existed and would have added nothing to the game ?! |

Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
165
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
+1 good decision. improve first, extend later. You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
227
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:20:00 -
[47] - Quote
I think a lot of people were looking forward to establishments because they were such a blank canvas, and people saw in them whatever features they wanted to see. We (both CSM and the public) certainly never saw any details on the actual *gameplay* that they were going to provide, so everyone naturally assumed their favorite pet feature would be present.
I'd like to see a concrete proposal from CCP on what sort of *fun* we will have in Establishments before they make it into the game. CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog What does CSM 6 do? |

Callic Veratar
Power of the Phoenix
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:20:00 -
[48] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
It would be nice if the framework for the shared player areas could be put on Sisi for the purpose of testing sooner, rather than later, so performance issues could be ironed out closer to the beginning than the end (or a couple weeks after patch day).
I can easily see how it would be hard to make a shared area "fun". Just look at early PSHome for what Establishments could be if they're done wrong. A slow mess that offers nothing to anyone besides a small core of die-hards that convince themselves it's awesome. Beyond that, segment the docked players between the 10k+ stations in universe and they're not going to be any fun. |

iNfeck7ed
Blueprint Haus Get Off My Lawn
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:21:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP actually learned its lesson and is not going to rush through crappy establishment expansions. Meanwhile, it has given us a template of fixes it will be working on for winter such as hybrid rebalancing, FW changes, sov mech changes, assault frig bonus fix, etc, as described in the recent devs. These are way more important so just sit tight. If you feel the need to walk your avatar, go play WoW and come back when WIS is fully launched. I'll light a cyno for you when it's here. |

Razin
The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:23:00 -
[50] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
I think this is an excellent approach to any new content; glad to see that Incarna will not be an exception.
I'll be looking forward to when Incarna is expanded beyond CQs with features that contain compelling gameplay that aligns well with existing EVE mechanics and philosophy.
|
|

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
65
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
In contrast, I was in such a good mood after the devblogs yesterday I paid up 2 account for a full year each, even though I could comfortably PLEX them. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

KhaelaMensha Khaine
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:24:00 -
[52] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
DickbeardThePirate wrote:If you're more concerned about not getting WiS content then you are pleased by the promise of FiS improvements, I would like to kindly ask you to get out.
|

Grateler
The People's Liberation Front of Offugen
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:28:00 -
[53] - Quote
Two step wrote:I think a lot of people were looking forward to establishments because they were such a blank canvas, and people saw in them whatever features they wanted to see. We (both CSM and the public) certainly never saw any details on the actual *gameplay* that they were going to provide, so everyone naturally assumed their favorite pet feature would be present.
I'd like to see a concrete proposal from CCP on what sort of *fun* we will have in Establishments before they make it into the game.
Indeed.
I dont see establishments giving 99% of people any reason to leave through the door. It would be turned off by most and ignored, so why waste time developing it until theres a good reason to ?
Gambling is a minigame, smuggling sounds like a concept at best and I wonder exactly how much fun that could be, surely it would just be walking to an avatar and back to ship ?
As you say until there are actual good reasons to walk around a station then Id rather resources spent where actual gameplay will benefit.
Id love to hear genuine reasons why these people are quitting because WiS has been put on the backbburner, other than it was "promised" as with the pointlessness of it thats a promise worth breaking. |

Di Mulle
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:28:00 -
[54] - Quote
Two step wrote:I think a lot of people were looking forward to establishments because they were such a blank canvas, and people saw in them whatever features they wanted to see. We (both CSM and the public) certainly never saw any details on the actual *gameplay* that they were going to provide, so everyone naturally assumed their favorite pet feature would be present.
I'd like to see a concrete proposal from CCP on what sort of *fun* we will have in Establishments before they make it into the game.
So much QFT.
CCP is unable to implement simpliest things. Like settting to hide signatures. So they sweep it under a rug . Children do that in their pre-shool years, CCP does it being adults. Probably because it is fearless enough. |

SilentSkills
Tax Evaders Inc.
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
give me your aurum ms. barbie |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
221
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:30:00 -
[56] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote: ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Sounds like a good plan.
No dates and big bomb somewhere in the future is better than plenty of promises and no bomb :) You know that it is ready when you find all your co workers playing wis instead of doing any work.
|

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
i see this "there will not be establishment anytime soon" as "we finished first step of development of WoD technology" and "you will not get anything of it because you are test hamsters" and "when we finish all for WoD then you (maybe) will get some crumbs of that technology"
in one opinion... too much development time spent to give us one big NOTHING... and you said to us that you don't want to limit yourself in some time period to give us something of that technology... so... we are back at the beginning of "incarna story" many years ago... and this was not 18 months... this was many years old story and counting...
just a humble opinion... |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
133
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:30:00 -
[58] - Quote
People do not seem to understand the scope and the amount of hardware it will take to make a multiplayer environement for Incarna in stations.
How many people are docked at jita 4-4 on a regular basis, or in rens or dodixie or amarr? How much server power do you think this will take? It will be a lot. 4-4 alone will probably have its own server. CCP is making the right move, fix the spaceships, get all the lost accounts and players back. Once that is done and people are happy again, then move full speed ahead to multiplayer in stations. |

Raid'En
Apprentice Innovations
51
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:36:00 -
[59] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. can i have your stuff ?
it's obvious they can't give both establishments + the fixes we need on the same extension. and given we weren't even sure they could give these establishments this soon, i prefer to be sure we will have the fixes. establishment can wait. as they said anyway, they need to work on the performance issue before releasing them.
two step is right also ; we don't really know what will be on it, so our opinion may be very different from each other. i'm curious to see what multiplayer incarna really is, but well if i have to choose between lots of stuff i really like for spaceships, and some unknown multiplayer incarna, my choice is quickly made.
|

Grateler
The People's Liberation Front of Offugen
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:44:00 -
[60] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:People do not seem to understand the scope and the amount of hardware it will take to make a multiplayer environement for Incarna in stations.
How many people are docked at jita 4-4 on a regular basis, or in rens or dodixie or amarr? How much server power do you think this will take? It will be a lot. 4-4 alone will probably have its own server. CCP is making the right move, fix the spaceships, get all the lost accounts and players back. Once that is done and people are happy again, then move full speed ahead to multiplayer in stations.
Even if the technology is there, what would people do !?
/dance ? /poke ?
Seems like a lot of development for not much gameplay. |
|

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:49:00 -
[61] - Quote
Marketing, Public relation, Feedback
Just thought i would leave it there . |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
347
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:50:00 -
[62] - Quote
Two step wrote:I think a lot of people were looking forward to establishments because they were such a blank canvas, and people saw in them whatever features they wanted to see. We (both CSM and the public) certainly never saw any details on the actual *gameplay* that they were going to provide, so everyone naturally assumed their favorite pet feature would be present.
I'd like to see a concrete proposal from CCP on what sort of *fun* we will have in Establishments before they make it into the game.
I have to be completely honest and say that any possible interest I had in Incarna/establishments etc was near completely erased by the NeX concept and the realization that Incarna was basically envisaged as a microtransaction vanity display cabinet rather than any form of meaningful gameplay. How can you get excited about customizing and prepping your own "establishment" when you know it will just involve being fleeced at NeX-store level greed for every seat cushion and holopainting in your bar?
The mere existence of NeX in Eve Online is a threat to traditionally-delivered content because its competing for design time and programming against core Eve content. For CCP to have any chance of making a profit from NeX it would have to a vehicle for the delivery of exclusive content and that alone would have had the impact of pushing out traditionally-delivered stuff (bpos/lp store/drops and PI manufacturing)
So the moment NeX launched I lost all hope for Incarna EVER having any worth in Eve Online because it wasn't part of Eve Online - it was an unwelcome intrusion of greedy marketing spiel and vanity nonsense that was parasiting on the development time desperately-needed by the core Eve experience.
Popping open the wallet and buying stupid monocles and plush bar chairs is not fun and content.
Exploring the depths of 0.0 gurrista space in such of rare drops from belt rats that can be manufactured into customizable death bunny head bar murals for an establishment where you sell elicit combat drugs probably is.
But the latter has nothing whatsoever to do with NeX.
As long as this horrible horrible MT currency abortion is active I don't see any future for Incarna whatsoever.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
249
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:53:00 -
[63] - Quote
In order for Incarna to have any chance whatsoever, there needs to be solid, interesting game play. That doesn't exist, nor has the CSM seen anything on the horizon that looks to change that. Since there never appeared to be a solid idea about what 'establishments' would bring to EVE, CCP basically postponed a feature that didn't exist in the first place.
Incarna has the potential to be amazing but in terms of importance, for example when allocating resources, it pales, or should pale, in comparison to spaceships. Certainly now, and probably for a long time to come as well. In the end, you can take Incarna out of EVE, but you can't take spaceships out of EVE. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |

Jita Alt666
326
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:53:00 -
[64] - Quote
Nice to see a large amount of rational common sense in this thread. CCP I hope you read thread like this and understand what your customers value.
Yes Incarna could be cool - but with nothing to do its a massive use of resources that could be used to fix things that irritate lots of us. |

Dirk Smacker
Kaalakiota Expeditionary Force
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:57:00 -
[65] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:People do not seem to understand the scope and the amount of hardware it will take to make a multiplayer environement for Incarna in stations.
How many people are docked at jita 4-4 on a regular basis, or in rens or dodixie or amarr? How much server power do you think this will take? It will be a lot. 4-4 alone will probably have its own server. CCP is making the right move, fix the spaceships, get all the lost accounts and players back. Once that is done and people are happy again, then move full speed ahead to multiplayer in stations. That's why the amount of resources required to run CQ boggles my mind. Way, way too much to allow large groups in one setting. |

Chris Sandstorm
BoB Enterprises Veni Vidi Vici Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:58:00 -
[66] - Quote
And not a single **** was given that day. |

Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
134
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 18:59:00 -
[67] - Quote
Grateler wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:People do not seem to understand the scope and the amount of hardware it will take to make a multiplayer environement for Incarna in stations.
How many people are docked at jita 4-4 on a regular basis, or in rens or dodixie or amarr? How much server power do you think this will take? It will be a lot. 4-4 alone will probably have its own server. CCP is making the right move, fix the spaceships, get all the lost accounts and players back. Once that is done and people are happy again, then move full speed ahead to multiplayer in stations. Even if the technology is there, what would people do !? /dance ? /poke ? Seems like a lot of development for not much gameplay.
/lapdance
Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars? OR like in the eve forever video of having a war target comeing up from behind you and sending you to a clone vat because of a knife in the back. But as they have stated before, drugs should not be on the market, they shoudl be done off the grid where no one can see you changing money.
simple stuff like that initially. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
516
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:01:00 -
[68] - Quote
I demand my stripper bars!... erm... I mean gentleman's clubs! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
445
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:09:00 -
[69] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I would dearly love to see a multiplayer avatar experience in EVE one day. I have always said and I will continue to say that in the long term, EVE needs avatar gameplay to continue to grow and evolve.
But the fact is your WiS platform is simply not ready to support that level of gameplay yet, and it is equally true that the FiS aspect of the game has simply been starved of resources too long. Right now, CCP's priority must be to ensure that there will be a "long term" in which WiS can eventually flower and grow.
It is my hope that a small, lean tean will emulate the shining success of Team Gridlock, and craft and improve the WiS engine to the point where it can realistically support the gameplay you want to give us and we'd love to have. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
223
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:16:00 -
[70] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:I demand my stripper bars!... erm... I mean gentleman's clubs! The word you're looking for is pleasure hub
|
|

Versuvius Marii
Browncoats of Persephone
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:23:00 -
[71] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. Feel free to contract me all your items. If you'd be kind enough to move them to Jita or Amarr first, that'd be just awesome. And thank you. |

mkint
121
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:25:00 -
[72] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:
Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars?
why use avatars when a regular window interface would work better?
Quote:OR like in the eve forever video of having a war target comeing up from behind you and sending you to a clone vat because of a knife in the back.
Why even leave your pod in that case?
Quote:But as they have stated before, drugs should not be on the market, they shoudl be done off the grid where no one can see you changing money.
like station trading, that we have a window interface for already?
Quote:
simple stuff like that initially.
That's the problem... I want incarna to be interesting and fun, but so far I haven't seen any truly great ideas. If the activity is something that could be done in a window interface just as easily (like mini-games such as poker or that tanks one they showed at a fanfest) then WalkinginStations becomes WaitinginLine.
So, I guess that leaves us to ask, what is it other games do when they are walking around? Mass Effect has you walk and shoot (covered by Dust), or walk to agents (worst part of the game.) Other MMO's are either walk and fight, or walk and craft, or walk and fish, or /dance. Granted my MMO experience has mostly focused on EVE, but my other ventures into MMOland have all been variations on the same thing. Even with Second Life, the entire game is an elaborate Sitting in Bars.
If you discount all the combat games (as far as CCP has said in the past, Dust will be combat, incarna will be... not combat) that leaves puzzle/adventure games, which doesn't seem very EVE-y.
The only thing I can think of to make Incarna even remotely useful is to allow us to haggle with our mission agents, and allow us to haggle out of taxes, brokers fees, and the like. Maybe allow us to buy better insurance or something. Perhaps all that would depend on facial expressions of the agent and a haggling minigame.
And then have bars besides. |

Tristan North
The Scope
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:35:00 -
[73] - Quote
mkint wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:
Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars?
why use avatars when a regular window interface would work better?
Why use spaceships when colored squares would work better? |

Too Much Effort
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:36:00 -
[74] - Quote
Alex Sinai wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. That is what i needed to hear. Alts created and friends invited to EVE! :-)
You don't have any friends.
|

Aquila Draco
48
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:47:00 -
[75] - Quote
Elanor Vega wrote:i see this "there will not be establishment anytime soon" as "we finished first step of development of WoD technology" and "you will not get anything of it because you are test hamsters" and "when we finish all for WoD then you (maybe) will get some crumbs of that technology"
in one opinion... too much development time spent to give us one big NOTHING... and you said to us that you don't want to limit yourself in some time period to give us something of that technology... so... we are back at the beginning of "incarna story" many years ago... and this was not 18 months... this was many years old story and counting...
just a humble opinion...
i would not be that harsh... but not far from that opinion... |

Kumq uat
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
I know Istvaan was wanting to open some kind of establishment. Perhaps we could set up a real club based on Guiding Hand. At any rate, FiS first, establishments later, etc. I am really looking forward to both Hybrid balancing and Assault Ship buffing. SUPER ISHKUR GO! |

Grateler
The People's Liberation Front of Offugen
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 19:55:00 -
[77] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:Grateler wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:People do not seem to understand the scope and the amount of hardware it will take to make a multiplayer environement for Incarna in stations.
How many people are docked at jita 4-4 on a regular basis, or in rens or dodixie or amarr? How much server power do you think this will take? It will be a lot. 4-4 alone will probably have its own server. CCP is making the right move, fix the spaceships, get all the lost accounts and players back. Once that is done and people are happy again, then move full speed ahead to multiplayer in stations. Even if the technology is there, what would people do !? /dance ? /poke ? Seems like a lot of development for not much gameplay. /lapdance Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars? OR like in the eve forever video of having a war target comeing up from behind you and sending you to a clone vat because of a knife in the back. But as they have stated before, drugs should not be on the market, they shoudl be done off the grid where no one can see you changing money. simple stuff like that initially.
These are the only two things that WiS supporters ever raise, gambling and Drug smuggling.
Gambling is a minigame that adds nothing to Eve, if you want to play online poker play online poker. Sure it would be a bit of fun, but worthy of years of development?
You wont be able to attack people in stations.
Drugs? What walking to an avatar and buying them would be interesting ? Again, not worthy of the development.
The sad truth is that WiS and avatars sound great and funky, but arent actually of much use in this game. We would just end up with an Ironforge where people stand still doing nothing until they are ready to actually play the game.
I think CCP have put a lot of resources into Incarna and realised now that the end result wasnt going to actually be any use.
|

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 20:26:00 -
[78] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Would you accept no for an answer without making an issue about it ?
IC what you did there! |

Jashmyne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 20:47:00 -
[79] - Quote
Grateler wrote: The sad truth is that WiS and avatars sound great and funky, but arent actually of much use in this game. We would just end up with an Ironforge where people stand still doing nothing until they are ready to actually play the game.
I think CCP have put a lot of resources into Incarna and realised now that the end result wasnt going to actually be any use.
Actually it would be of great use for RPers which is really what WiS is meant for and which RPers are currently waiting for. Why would a PVP player care about walking around in a station ? As you said, you can't kill anyone there but for RPers that doesn't matter. They want a enviroment where they can connect to their characters and interact with each other. CCP got the character part done and ready and parts of the enviroment. Now just need the rest like the bars with mini-games in them. |

Flamespar
Woof Club
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 20:51:00 -
[80] - Quote
OMG. A straight answer from CCP!
Here is my personal prediction.
Nothing new for Incarna for 12 months. Except maybe some refinements and new functionality for the captains quarters.
Then they will relaunch it as actual expansion with content and compelling gameplay. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
|

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 20:53:00 -
[81] - Quote
Grateler wrote:...........
smuggling sounds like a concept at best and I wonder exactly how much fun that could be, surely it would just be walking to an avatar and back to ship ?
From fanfest, the idea was you would buy stuff face to face establishments, stuff that was illegal and could only be sold there, "off the grid". Other players would take the place of the customs NPCs you see at stargates. They would scan your ship, and if it had illegal items in it they would get rights to shot you or set you to shoot-on-sight by anyone and everyone unless you paid a ransom.. I mean a fine, yes a fine.
It was Incarna content that tied to flying in space PvP content. And now we have to wait for it. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
17
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:05:00 -
[82] - Quote
I want WiS. I do not mind so much if it takes longer, but I would appreciate more self-reflection in the capabilities of their teams from CCP in the future. Spell that HONESTY. If I'm sure I miss a deadline because the goal is impossible, I tell management. Yes, I work in a very different sector of IT but still...
Also some refocussing on non-combat flying in space stuff would be nice. There are a lot of things you can do in space, even if some people get orgasms killing miners. (Who - honestly - should then start hiring mercs instead of mimimi)
In the end I think both FiS shouters and WiS fans will be kind of disillusioned by the few changes that will be made in the "Winter Expansion".
And yes, I like spaceships and spend 90% of my EVE time in one. And yes, I'm a RPler too and like avatars that can meet.
So, remember, we all are players. If you hate Avatars, go back to ship spinning. You never will have to touch it.
But that guy now creating textures for another vampire chick could have made some of your fellow players happy too. He is not a resource missing in EVE development, I think. |

Zimmy Zeta
Humanidyne Inc.
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Honestly, I think the whole concept of incarna was wrong. CCP repeatedly stated that there would be no combat involved like FPS-style killing sprees. Considering that the majority of eve players go great lenghts just to blow stuff up and watch shiny ships go boom I find it hard to believe that any of them would find a "pacifistic" environment for their avatars enjoyable. If CCP wants the players to accept WiS, it will not work without combat. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:09:00 -
[84] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:mkint wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:
Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars?
why use avatars when a regular window interface would work better? Why use spaceships when colored squares would work better?
Exactly. The entire idea of having gambling and contraband sales in establishments is to avoid having another "spreadsheet in space" type feature.
EvE is not a text based adventure game. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
38
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:14:00 -
[85] - Quote
Wait a minute, wernt th ecrying threads about how Incarna wasnt wanted and that rebalancing spaceships and doing all stuff liek thats was what should really be done? And now it looks like it might be, the same people are going to whine about how Incarna isnt coming out fast enough? Whoda thunk... |

Varesk
Maelstrom Crew
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:14:00 -
[86] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
can i have your stuff? you can contract it to this character. I will send my freighter alt to pick it up. kthx! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
446
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:15:00 -
[87] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Wait a minute, wernt th ecrying threads about how Incarna wasnt wanted and that rebalancing spaceships and doing all stuff liek thats was what should really be done? And now it looks like it might be, the same people are going to whine about how Incarna isnt coming out fast enough? Whoda thunk...
I bolded the wrong part. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
64
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:19:00 -
[88] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Wait a minute, wernt th ecrying threads about how Incarna wasnt wanted and that rebalancing spaceships and doing all stuff liek thats was what should really be done? And now it looks like it might be, the same people are going to whine about how Incarna isnt coming out fast enough? Whoda thunk...
Different people. Alot of us do like seeing our avatars and do want multi-player environments. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:26:00 -
[89] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Eventually... that partially adresses my 2 main issues with Incarna:
Issue #1: Too few time to deliver it in the schedule suggested. I always thought of the "real" Incarna as a 2012 feature at best. Sure your team could deliver something this winter, CCP Solomon, but NOT the real stuff, rather yet another half cooked, poorly optimized feature. And probably with a severe case of my...
Issue #2: What can Incarna do for my game experience? Smuggle boosters? I never touched a booster with a ten feet pole. Boosters are not a part of my gameplay. What do I want from Incarna? First of all, I want NPCs. Because my life in New Eden is spent in stations where I barely can see 8 other guys docked at once and playing all roles of the play because of being alone in a big empty station doesn't suits my taste. What else? I want some 20th century technology. I want a holo-chat to speak with people in the other corner of the universe & interact with their virtual personae, rather than a silly text box in the lower left corner of my screen. More things? I want public spaces (theaters?) that can be rent/hired/whatever to hold public events: give awards, corporate meetings, employer of the month parties, whatever. Military parades by dust bunnies, beauty contests, roleplaying sessions, any events that the players can develop on their own to fill the void without a need to have a huge corporarion that owes the "establishment", just hire it, do your stuff, then leave. More? I want to have a gazillion emotes, i want to kiss, hug, slap, spit, hifive or just touch other players. I want to be able to dance a tango or waltz with a man i like (or a woman!) or do some line dancing or a jig or whatever... just some thoughts of the top of my head, but I guess you see the pattern...
I want that Incarna allows people to have fun by socializing rather than trying to kill each other.
And now you got TIME to work towards that. I should had never left X3: Reunion |

Kumq uat
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:34:00 -
[90] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:Tristan North wrote:mkint wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:
Anyway, looking at it form a perspective. How many play EOH poker? why not be able to play it in game at a real table with avatars?
why use avatars when a regular window interface would work better? Why use spaceships when colored squares would work better? Exactly. The entire idea of having gambling and contraband sales in establishments is to avoid having another "spreadsheet in space" type feature. EvE is not a text based adventure game.
You are in a room. The exits are north, east, and Dennis.
You see a blaster.
"Get ye blaster."
You cannot get ye blaster. |
|

Desert Ice78
Gryphon River Industries R-I-P
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:38:00 -
[91] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
So in other words, you are not going to launch half-finished, half-baked, bug riddled content?? And instead lauched polished content?
No complaints here..... I am a Pod Pilot:
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1109/Hostile-Takeover-by-Marek-Okon[1].jpg
|
|

CCP Solomon
C C P C C P Alliance
38

|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:41:00 -
[92] - Quote
Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed  Associate Technical Producer - Carbon |
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:44:00 -
[93] - Quote
Zimmy Zeta wrote: Honestly, I think the whole concept of incarna was wrong. CCP repeatedly stated that there would be no combat involved like FPS-style killing sprees. Considering that the majority of eve players go great lenghts just to blow stuff up and watch shiny ships go boom I find it hard to believe that any of them would find a "pacifistic" environment for their avatars enjoyable. If CCP wants the players to accept WiS, it will not work without combat.
Which is an illusion created by current PVP shoutbox, because there are a lot of people enjoying other parts of EVE. Like the ones constructing said shiny space ships or the ones mining the stuff to build shiny space ships or those who like to explore more than to shoot spaceships and the glorious CSM did nothing for them.
I do like the open PVP approach EVE takes, but blowing up spaceships sincerly is not all.
A few years ago there were many initiatives around EVE that were quite good and player organized events. Lately the talk has been all around pew-pew. If I want pew-pew ONLY I play Lost4Dead or one of the other shooters I have installed.
EVE used to be an intelligent game that made you think out of the box.
Now go kiss some lower backs in 0-Sec, k? |

Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:47:00 -
[94] - Quote
Well, i actually hoped for the establishments, because i thought they are almost done already.
Tbh, i was really forward looking to the games CCP presented at the last fanfest.
That said ... i'm glad that you finally extend and fix the simulation again. :)
WHERE'S MY SHINY ????????!!!!!!! :D *lol*
Also, if you want to add content to the quarter, ADD MINIGAMES AND A WAY WE CAN PLAY AGAINST EACHOTHER, MAYBE ON THE BIG SCREEN OR HOWEVER !
THINK ! ABOUT ! IT !
:)
I KNOW there are plenty of people not caring about this, but i also know there are quite some people who'd enjoy it. :)
Like ... myself. Gimme a chess. checkers. go. TIC-TAC-TOE ! :)
That strange game you've shown on fanfest, which took place in the establishment, I REALLY WANT TO LAY MY HANDS ON THIS ONE !!! *lol*
I promise, people will like it ! :) (unless your games crappy, but you can't fail much at chess, for example. ^^) |

Juil
Phoenix Industries Pty. Ltd.
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:49:00 -
[95] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed 
Why so you can promise more stuff and then 'push it away' when you miss your deadlines?
Since 2006 you have been promising Ambulation as it was back then, then the last 2 fan fests you've been hyping about incarna.. you've told us that we would finally be given the keys to the station that we could interact in a avatar.. that we could leave the ship and start to explore the OTHER side of eve.. and that you would be giving us the tools to make what we wished of it...
Now your saying sorry summer expansion was a big aprils fools joke.. and once again we are not finishing and deliviering on what we have promsied.
And yes I know people are going to flame me for this but I was looking forward to Incarna in it's full not for what it is at the moment.. but for what it promised.. Making more of the EVE SANDBOX into an actual SANDBOX. I love my Space Ships, but I also love being able to escape from that reality and Incarna if it was anything like they had hyped on about at fanfest would have given you something akin to what Second Life has managed.. only with better content and better graphics.
People seem to think that because there is no 'actual' solid game play defined by CCP that sorry it's not a feature.. but that's the point, Eve is not meant to be 'this is how you play, this is what you do and that is that' Eve is meant to be a Sandbox, it's meant to be 'here are the tools, go and make the game play you want'... and Incarna had the hint of that finally TRUELY becoming something.. from being able to put tattoo's all over my Avatar's body, to making an establishment to finally maybe making all those worthless dancers I have useful etc..
It had the possiblity of opening up entire new Industrial area's for those who are Industrialists... manufacturing entire new sets of items for the AVATAR side of the game..
and yet instead we got NeX and now we get yet another dropped expansion.. half finished and from CCP's track record.. never to BE finished.
Thanks for lieing for the past several years CCP.. and for getting peoples hopes up at a fantastic feature only to again scrap it. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
106
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 21:50:00 -
[96] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
your stuff, contract it to me in Jita 4-4. Anyone who is blue to DRF are cowards and have failed Eve.
MM Bombers, Best Bombers |

Tristan North
The Scope
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:13:00 -
[97] - Quote
Denidil wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
your stuff, contract it to me in Jita 4-4.
Just +1 who wrote it before you, after you read it 2 times it becomes irritating.
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:21:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed 
To kick some lower backs? I have real legs... ;) But you can buy me a beer at fanfest and I might forgive you the troll post. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:23:00 -
[99] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Well, that sucks. I guess Ill be back when you guys get serious about avatar gameplay. Ive only been waiting 3 years (or whatever). I'm going to go wait somewhere else. CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this. |

Ni Cho
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:33:00 -
[100] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I am all for this Incarna stuff people complained about CCP not doing for many years before I even played Eve Online: a sometimes crappy game. I am glad to see the space ship crap being worked on, since you know, I am a starship captain and all that crap.
Just make sure you roll out that Incarna crap right and with **** people can do, maybe even with out blowing up our computers... 
I want my Sexual Enhancement shop to be of the same high quality as the ding dongs I will be peddling.
But I want spaceship crap to be right/nice/fixed/cool FIRST. |
|

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:42:00 -
[101] - Quote
Ni Cho wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I am all for this Incarna stuff people complained about CCP not doing for many years before I even played Eve Online: a sometimes crappy game. I am glad to see the space ship crap being worked on, since you know, I am a starship captain and all that crap. Just make sure you roll out that Incarna crap right and with **** people can do, maybe even with out blowing up our computers...  I want my Sexual Enhancement shop to be of the same high quality as the ding dongs I will be peddling. But I want spaceship crap to be right/nice/fixed/cool FIRST.
You said crap more often than I said lower backs today while meaning arse! I salute you, Goon.
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:44:00 -
[102] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote: Well, that sucks. I guess Ill be back when you guys get serious about avatar gameplay. Ive only been waiting 3 years (or whatever). I'm going to go wait somewhere else. CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this.
My thoughts are pretty similar. The only decision for me is as to whether I stay subscribed and just train skills or just quit until CCP finally delivers something worth coming back for. I might give it a week or so to see what the upcoming Dev blogs promise.
Personally I would love some sort of statement from CCP on what Incarna will actually contain, merely so I have something to look forward to, and work towards being ready for. As opposed to this endless c**k tease. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
89
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:51:00 -
[103] - Quote
CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:53:00 -
[104] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
Stay Classy |

Zenethian
The Jagged Edge Ushra'Khan
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:53:00 -
[105] - Quote
I have always been opposed to the very idea of Incarna. Eve at it's core is an internet spaceships game.
If you wanna walk around in a space station, go get a SecondLife account.
I was really worried that Incarna was going to become the focus of Eve's development. I was considering cancelling my accounts because of it. However, with this latest news, I will be keeping my accounts, and maybe even adding a new one.
TL;DR: Accounts subbed! |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
22
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:54:00 -
[106] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:58:00 -
[107] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know?
Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list.
CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.06 23:58:00 -
[108] - Quote
Zenethian wrote:I have always been opposed to the very idea of Incarna. Eve at it's core is an internet spaceships game.
If you wanna walk around in a space station, go get a SecondLife account.
I was really worried that Incarna was going to become the focus of Eve's development. I was considering cancelling my accounts because of it. However, with this latest news, I will be keeping my accounts, and maybe even adding a new one.
TL;DR: Accounts subbed!
WIS and FIS are not mutually exclusive |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:01:00 -
[109] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path.
LOL - You did read my earlier doubts on avatar geeks working on FiS stuff, right? There is no "priority FiS or WiS" I think. They use the FiS shouters so they can.. Ah, I give up. Search for my earlier posts. I'm tired. |

Vanilla Twilight
Your Slit is Mine Federation
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:01:00 -
[110] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know?
CCP must bring NEW content that have something to do with what EVE IS, a space fuckin ship game, not The Sims online. |
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:03:00 -
[111] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path. LOL - You did read my earlier doubts on avatar geeks working on FiS stuff, right? There is no "priority FiS or WiS" I think. They use the FiS shouters so they can.. Ah, I give up. Search for my earlier posts. I'm tired.
Like i asked you on another thread.. have you got any idea about how feature development works? Or do you think its only Team A do this and Team B do that.. then you get everything together and bundle into one expansion? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Aidan Brooder wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line. You should not dismiss everyone as a "barbie maniac" just because they want other features in the game. I know many who quit not because of Incarna - but because the game got boooring doing the same stuff all over again. There are people have something called imagination, ya know? Yes, and if you take your.... *staying classy*.... If you care to read all that has been said again you will realize that Incarna was not scrapped, only put into its proper place on the development priority list. CCP prioritized Incarna while there was still things to do. Now they are backtracking, and taking the proper path.
Without having access to the subscription data I can only assume you are correct, as CCP seems to agree with you. I am not as upset with the direction of the game as I am this continued bait and switch. CCP has for years given us the impression that WIS was just around the corner and it seems, just as we are about to arrive, the rug is pulled out from under us again. |

Tristan North
The Scope
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:04:00 -
[113] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:CCP stopped focusing on spaceships, started focusing on Incarna.
Subscriptions canceled, log-ins dropped.
Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
That's just what they want you to believe untill WiS is complete. |

Afale II
Space Pony Farm
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:07:00 -
[114] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
So Incarna became another half finished and abandoned project. And no i don't think there will be a multiplayer part for Incarna ever.
You just **** off one part of the playerbase to please the other. This flip flopping won't work. FFS just one time finish the Project before you beginn another. -Nostalgia is not as good as it used to be- |

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:07:00 -
[115] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say.
Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game.
Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles.
I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations.
I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:11:00 -
[116] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say. Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game. Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles. I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations.
http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.html
Incarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
49
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:11:00 -
[117] - Quote
Finishing Establishments by Winter was very unlikely, and everyone should have known better by the time the CQ launch was pushed so far back to be a WINTER expansion when it was implicated to be a late Incarna expansion addition.
Establishments are more than just the structures.
Establishments for EVE represents the following :
Player owned station rooms, 100% customizable establishments, UI to manage customized establishments (including scripting NPCs), mutliple establishments per station, multi-player environment supporting undefined number of players, mini-games (poker, etc), Scripted NPC's, Stripper NPC actions and "clothing", social "drinking", functional environments, emotional animations (smile, sad, angry, wave), interactive environments, a concourse(??) to move between establishments, new boosters, booster trading mechanics in establishments only, player policed booster smuggling, new "local" channel, and the list goes on and on and on for establishments.
All of that is NOT getting done by winter. It's a fact, it's way too much and rushing it is just going to make it crapola. Establishments might seem like a simple addition, but really it's a whole content package that is going to be really challenging to get right, and they have ONE SHOT to do it right, so they better hit it on the head the first time.
I wish it were coming this WInter, but the fact is it just isn't. NOSTRO AURUM NON EST AURUM VULGI |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:12:00 -
[118] - Quote
Afale II wrote:You just **** off one part of the playerbase to please the other. This flip flopping won't work. FFS just one time finish the Project before you beginn another.
Well said. This should concern not just fans disappointed that WIS is pushed back, but all the people that are happy FIS is now priority have to wonder: For how long? How long until CCP flip flops back the other way without finishing FIS projects. |

Equto
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:14:00 -
[119] - Quote
I assume ccp is working / has been working on the minigames, would it be too much to ask for the simple ones to be added to our quarters so that we can atleast see what you had in mind without taking staff from anywhere else as the minigames should already be finished( you did show them at fanfest) |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:ONE SHOT to do it right, so they better hit it on the head the first time.
I wish it were coming this WInter, but the fact is it just isn't.
I agree with what your saying. The problem isn't the reality, its how CCP has pimped WIS for 5 years and the expectations set forth.
|
|

Tristan North
The Scope
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:21:00 -
[121] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Flamespar wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say. Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game. Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles. I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations. http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.htmlIncarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that.
Close minded customers like you almost killed EvE.
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:26:00 -
[122] - Quote
Personally I think we won't hear anything significant about it for about 12 months whilst they focus on FiS and restoring customer confidence.
Players have been incredibly patient with CCP, amazingly so considering how often expansions have not met the hype (PI anyone? ) I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:29:00 -
[123] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Flamespar wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote: Sorry barbie maniacs, you just got pushed to the back of the line.
This is just a ******** thing to say. Different players enjoy different activities in EVE. There is no point to dismissing their particular interest because you do not share it. Some players don't want Incarna, some do, some don't care, some want elements of both. Similaly some don't want to do planetary interaction, or mining, or pvp or PVE. We all have our favourite ways of playing the game, and I think it is one of EVE's strengths that we actually have all of these ways of interacting with the game. Personally I have no problem with each group having their particular interests focussed on for a particular expansion. I just have a problem with the half arsed approach to satsifying their interests that has typified CCP for the last few expansion cycles. I don't care about the content of the next expansion. I just want a polished set of features that actually - for once - meet our expectations. http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.htmlIncarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Close minded customers like you almost killed EvE.
What about close-eyed customers?
Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Oberine Noriepa
108
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:45:00 -
[124] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.html
Incarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Are you assuming that even a well developed implementation of Incarna in tandem with proper FiS support would kill the community? Because I'm pretty sure it wouldn't. CCP, so far as they say, have learned from their mistakes. Seeing as how Incarna's poor implementation promoted no growth whatsoever, it would be foolish to assume that they would repeat the same error. |

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 00:53:00 -
[125] - Quote
Oberine Noriepa wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.html
Incarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Are you assuming that even a well developed implementation of Incarna in tandem with proper FiS support would kill the community? Because I'm pretty sure it wouldn't. CCP, so far as they say, have learned from their mistakes. Seeing as how Incarna's poor implementation promoted no growth whatsoever, it would be foolish to assume that they would repeat the same error.
I agree. And's it pretty lazy analysis to point the finger at Incarna and say it killed EVE, when if you bothred to remove your head from your arse before looking at that graph that it is obvious that the roots of EVE's decline in subscriber numbers began before Incarna's deployment, and is probably due to multiple factors.
Let's hope the decline in numbers doesn't continue despite the refocus on FiS. I think it will continue, as CCP has a lot of work ahead restoring faith and meeting their own hype before players start coming back. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 01:09:00 -
[126] - Quote
My guess is that after releasing "walking in closets" the overwhelming dissatisfaction and even anger that brought down on their heads forced to take a fresh look at the whole Incarna plan and I suspect they came to the conclusion that as it was, it would just annoy people and that 95% of players would just opt to disable it. I'm guessing their plan was basically to just spread out the current things you can access in a station all over the inside of the station. Essentially the same approach as the CQ, but more spread out. So you'd need to walk down the hall to get to the market and agents would each be in different rooms and there would be a repair shop on the second floor and whatnot. The corporate offices were just going to be how you got to your corporate hanger. I doubt they had any clear ideas for anything significant and new that you could, or would want to, do in stations. I get how that might have sounded cool to them at first, I get that their marketing people probably went nuts about how that was the feature that would make them into the next WoW... But when you really get down to it, it's just a way to make the game a whole long more painful to use. The way people reacted to the CQ made it very clear how they would react to the even more painful variant they had planned, so now they're back to the drawing board. That's my guess anyways. Just speculation. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 01:47:00 -
[127] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Oberine Noriepa wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:http://jestertrek.blogspot.com/2011/08/some-curves-arent.html
Incarna almost killed EVE. Simple as that. Are you assuming that even a well developed implementation of Incarna in tandem with proper FiS support would kill the community? Because I'm pretty sure it wouldn't. CCP, so far as they say, have learned from their mistakes. Seeing as how Incarna's poor implementation promoted no growth whatsoever, it would be foolish to assume that they would repeat the same error. I agree. And's it pretty lazy analysis to point the finger at Incarna and say it killed EVE, when if you bothred to remove your head from your arse before looking at that graph that it is obvious that the roots of EVE's decline in subscriber numbers began before Incarna's deployment, and is probably due to multiple factors. Let's hope the decline in numbers doesn't continue despite the refocus on FiS. I think it will continue, as CCP has a lot of work ahead restoring faith and meeting their own hype before players start coming back.
Let me rephrase then.
Focusing on Incarna almost killed EVE.
We were listening to Zulu telling us that incarna would be CCP focus for the foreseeable future, and that FiS wouldn't get any major attention for at least the next 3 to 5 years.
So let me say this again. There are thing that MUST be fixed/rebalanced/iterated with FiS before any proper attention can be given to WiS. CCP believes that IT IS NOT POSSIBLE for them to deliver any meaningfull FiS content this year if they also have to finish WiS and estabilishments.
So if they are SAYING that they CANNOT DO IT, then by all means let them do it their way. The LAST thing anyone wants is for CCP to bite more than they can chew once more. Which is what they did with Incarna, and what got us to this point.
And at any rate, and i'm not trying to scorn anyone, just look at the amount of people that are irked by this change in CCP's development plans, and the amount of people that are HAPPY.
Now go back and look at the amount of people that liked what CCP was doing regarding WiS, and the amount of people who were irked by it. Compare the numbers, and tell me with a straight face that what CCP is doing now is wrong as a company who wishes to retain the majority of the customers it has left, and wishes to nurture any hope of recovering those it lost. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Di Mulle
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 01:49:00 -
[128] - Quote
Teamosil wrote: So you'd need to walk down the hall to get to the market and agents would each be in different rooms and there would be a repair shop on the second floor and whatnot. The corporate offices were just going to be how you got to your corporate hanger. I doubt they had any clear ideas for anything significant and new that you could, or would want to, do in stations. I get how that might have sounded cool to them at first, I get that their marketing people probably went nuts about how that was the feature that would make them into the next WoW...
Then their marketing people should have been really mentally disabled...though nothing would surprise me anymore. But more naive part of me still thinks situation wasn't exactly 100% SO bad. But it slid there due to the tunnel vision, which was caused by technical problems and "awesome visions" without real substance.
CCP is unable to implement simpliest things. Like settting to hide signatures. So they sweep it under a rug . Children do that in their pre-shool years, CCP does it being adults. Probably because it is fearless enough. |

Cherry Stripe
Robot Socialist Republic SpaceMonkey's Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 02:17:00 -
[129] - Quote
Oberine Noriepa wrote:On top of this, when are those new nebulae coming out?
This
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 03:02:00 -
[130] - Quote
You know an expansion with the rest of Incarna, all the propsed PVP and null sec changes, and the new nebula, would be pretty awesome.
It would even warrant it being called EVE: Reborn
Shame it's not going to happen for a very long time.
I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |
|

Tethys Atreides
The Audacity of Huge
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 03:35:00 -
[131] - Quote
Reality check:
CCP is a relatively small , independant studio. They overstepped their bounds and bit off more than they can chew. **** happens. I'm not white knighting, just stating the facts. I for one am interested in Incarna, and all that comes with it. I also expect it to be executed at the same high standard that FiS is.
Despite my cynical post history, I am quite impressed with the recent turn of events in regards to CCP senior leadership, and I am very hopeful that it will result in a better game for all of us. If that means waiting for a finished product a bit longer then so be it.
PS - Or maybe it's the wine (whine?) talking.
PPS - Also, I won't spend a red cent in the NEX store untill we get a multi-avatar environment (hint, hint). |

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 03:47:00 -
[132] - Quote
Tethys Atreides wrote:Reality check:
CCP is a relatively small , independant studio. They overstepped their bounds and bit off more than they can chew. **** happens. I'm not white knighting, just stating the facts. I for one am interested in Incarna, and all that comes with it. I also expect it to be executed at the same high standard that FiS is.
Reality check:
Hilmar wrote: Growing the company to 600 people http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=2672 I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Tethys Atreides
The Audacity of Huge
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 03:56:00 -
[133] - Quote
Vs. Sony, who can draw on a pool of 160,000 people...
Or Blizzard with 2,700.
 |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
334
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 04:03:00 -
[134] - Quote
Oberine Noriepa wrote:Are you assuming that even a well developed implementation of Incarna in tandem with proper FiS support would kill the community? If they try and do it at the expense of the real game then yes it will kill the community. If they can manage to fix and enhance core gameplay and add Incarna to that then it might succeed.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 05:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Oberine Noriepa wrote:Are you assuming that even a well developed implementation of Incarna in tandem with proper FiS support would kill the community? If they try and do it at the expense of the real game then yes it will kill the community. If they can manage to fix and enhance core gameplay and add Incarna to that then it might succeed.
Yes.
And they said that they can't so i honestly don't see the point in this pointless thread with absolutely no point to be properly pointed out. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
21
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 05:45:00 -
[136] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:Afale II wrote:You just **** off one part of the playerbase to please the other. This flip flopping won't work. FFS just one time finish the Project before you beginn another. Well said. This should concern not just fans disappointed that WIS is pushed back, but all the people that are happy FIS is now priority have to wonder: For how long? How long until CCP flip flops back the other way without finishing FIS projects.
That's one thing all these folks who are talking about resubbing and being extra happy about more FiS stuff. I'm all for more stuff whether it'd be WiS or FiS, but the one thing I can't deal with is flip-flopping. They've come out and admitted they were bullshitting us all and that Incarna in its current state is fail. They tell us in so many words its been put on the back burner, now how long that will be lord only knows.
Now they say they are going to refocus on FiS and people jump for joy and reclaim their loyalty to CCP. Lol.. They just got done telling you how they've been outright stringing you along the last months and how they are gonna get serious again. Why be so quick to claim victory for FiS supporters? Have they given you anything yet? Did you already place the bitter CCP lies in your mental vault to give them complete forgiveness.
You'd be just as foolish as the WiS folks who are left with egg on their faces. When the Winter Expansion hits and people actually get the results just how appeased they'll be.
Sadly at the state and age of EvE online and they ever evolving platform of gaming as a whole. I am sad to say I don't believe Incarna will ever be. Because every time they'll actually bring it up. It will be half-assed and/or trolled on by folks asking for more FiS and how Incarna is stupid even after they've gotten new toys.
Tl;dr People want their cake and to eat it too.. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
38
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 05:49:00 -
[137] - Quote
I'm sure this was a hard call, but probably the right decision at this point.
Yes, you are going to take flack from many because you put out "another unfinished feature", even though this is because you had to devote those resources to finishing "other unfinished features". 
A lot of comments have been made concerning the point that was made about the plan for Incarna content not being up to snuff, that no fleshed out concepts had been run past the CSM, and that getting the tech running to facilitate making WOD tick was more important than figuring out how to properly fit Incarna into EVE.
I'm going to assume that while actual design and coding work is devoted to FIS content and iteration this winter, the main work on Incarna (beyond releasing the rest of the CQ's) will center around optimizing the engine itself and forming a working outline for how to make avatar based game play be an entertaining enhancement to EVE as opposed a collection of things that can be done more easily from our current interface.
To be a success, Incarna needs to:
1: Tie into and ENHANCE current PVP and PVE content. Preferably affecting not only things like manufacturing, working the market, and agent missions... but also provide tangible benefits to PVP activities (whether in planning, making treaties, gathering intel, etc.).
2: Open completely new area's of game play that are engaging and fun, as well as make practical sense to do in your avatar instead of a pop up window. It must NOT focus on content that makes no practical sense to be avatar dependent.
3: Leverage the endless content that comes from player interaction instead of providing only static content that is exactly the same every time you do it.
This is a tall order, and will likely need to tie in with a large number of existing game area's as well as large number of completely new area's of game play. Basically, it is almost as staggeringly large a project as creating the EVE universe to begin with.
Personally I would establish some firm guidelines for Incarna content similar to what was done for developing null sec (and by extension further defining the other sec area's in EVE) before I do anything else.
Second I would make those guidelines available to the CSM and let them kick it around.
Third, I would then present those guidelines to the community in a blog to get not only general feedback but to harvest the inevitable flood of ideas that the community will generate that fit within those guidelines.
Then I would take the best of those idea's, combine them with your own and what you already have in the pipe, and create your game plan from that. Put out those broad strokes to gather some feedback and then apply the whip to the programmers liberally. 
If you take this approach, you will find a huge portion of the player base will become heavily invested in the success of Incarna... which is a big win for us all. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Meeogi
Debitum Naturae RED.Legion
3
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 05:52:00 -
[138] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
HAHA What a drama queen. Just stop while your ahead.
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 05:56:00 -
[139] - Quote
Meeogi wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. HAHA What a drama queen. Just stop while your ahead.
Funny story.. In-game i would be shooting a lot of people here.. but on this thread we are all on the same side lol.
In other words, complainers are either new people or high-sec bears and those who are happy about the changes are EVE vets who actually play the game. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Bane Necran
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:01:00 -
[140] - Quote
So, i guess it's time dilation for the winter expansion, then? Please that vocal minority who never shut up about lag in large fleet battles?
I imagine the majority of the playerbase who exist in hisec will be equally pleased.
Renan Ruivo wrote:In other words, complainers are either new people or high-sec bears and those who are happy about the changes are EVE vets who actually play the game.
Generalizations, while fun, and a good way to limit the amount of things you have to consider, are often incorrect. |
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:07:00 -
[141] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:So, i guess it's time dilation for the winter expansion, then? Please that vocal minority who never shut up about lag in large fleet battles?
I imagine the majority of the playerbase who exist in hisec will be equally pleased.
High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content.
It is about damn time you lost your virginity already. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Bane Necran
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:10:00 -
[142] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content.
It is about damn time you lost your virginity already.
Not only did i respond in advance to this mentality, but i'm also currently a 0.0 dweller, and have been before as well.
It's about time you left your simple little paradigm. The real world is big and complicated. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:20:00 -
[143] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content.
It is about damn time you lost your virginity already. Not only did i respond in advance to this mentality, but i'm also currently a 0.0 dweller, and have been before as well. It's about time you left your simple little paradigm. The real world is big and complicated.
So care to explain to me in detail what you think was the catalyst for Hillmar's letter? You are going to tell me that "people whined" and therefore CCP listened? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Montevius Williams
Trigger works
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:24:00 -
[144] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Tethys Atreides wrote:Reality check:
CCP is a relatively small , independant studio. They overstepped their bounds and bit off more than they can chew. **** happens. I'm not white knighting, just stating the facts. I for one am interested in Incarna, and all that comes with it. I also expect it to be executed at the same high standard that FiS is.
Reality check: Hilmar wrote: Growing the company to 600 people http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=2672
HAHA You think 600 people makes a large company. Wow... |

Montevius Williams
Trigger works
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:29:00 -
[145] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Bane Necran wrote:So, i guess it's time dilation for the winter expansion, then? Please that vocal minority who never shut up about lag in large fleet battles?
I imagine the majority of the playerbase who exist in hisec will be equally pleased. High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content. It is about damn time you lost your virginity already.
I thought EVE was a sandbox? You can call 0.0 "Endgame" but that would be a stretch.
Whats Endgame for a pirate? Whats Endgame for a Market Tycoon? Whats Endgame for an Industrialists? Whats Endgame for a mission runner? What's Engame for Miner?
If Im playing WoW, I know exactly what Endgame is. If I'm playing EVE, Endgame is whatever YOU want it to be, thus the Beauty of the Sandbox that is EVE. |

KhaelaMensha Khaine
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:31:00 -
[146] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Players have been incredibly patient with CCP, amazingly so considering how often expansions have not met the hype (PI anyone? )
Welcome to EVE Online - a game for life, not just Xmas. Those of us who love this game and the journey it's on are a patient lot who are willing to wait for new content as long as it's worth the wait when it arrives. Incarna wasn't - plain and simple - arguing about whether it WILL be once it's fully implemented is just speculation.
This is nothing new. EvE is (and probably always will be) a work in progress. CCP always "talk" about lots of stuff they want to add to the game but it always takes much longer than expected to arrive.
If the Incarna launch had been a success we wouldn't be seeing any of this refocusing but it wasn't and CCP has admitted as much, so if they continued with their previous plans for the Winter Expansion they would be pretty dumb.
Flamespar wrote:You know an expansion with the rest of Incarna, all the propsed PVP and null sec changes, and the new nebula, would be pretty awesome.
No, it would be completely be rubbish. Trying to include that much new content in a single expansion would be a recipe for performance problems, bugs and incomplete gameplay. It's that approach that caused this mess in the first place.
As Hilmar said CCP became too ambitious on the back of their (well deserved) success. The sensible thing to do was to admit their mistake (which he did - aswell as taking full responsibility for it) and refocus yet again. This is bound to cause further disappointment amongst players but better to have that now than another major crisis in the future. That's not flip-flopping.
Tethys Atreides wrote:Reality check:
CCP is a relatively small , independant studio. They overstepped their bounds and bit off more than they can chew. **** happens.
Spot on. Finally someone with a brain.
Seriously, it's like half you people didn't read what Hilmar wrote at all. Finally you get a letter direct from the CEO (the sort of communication which has been lacking for so long) and you choose to ignore it. For those of you that don't believe/trust him -WHY ARE YOU EVEN STILL HERE? Go play something else you hypocrites.
Nobody is going to be completely happy with this next expansion so don't expect too much. All the different interest groups want what they were promised but CCP can't make everyone happy in just 3 months. However, if it shows that CCP have their priorities correct and are back to releasing kick-ass content then that's a good sign for the future.
TLDR - If your decision to play EvE, an 8 year old game which is still growing and changing (albeit at a glacial pace recently) is based entirely on what will be in the next expansion, then this is the wrong game for you. |

Bane Necran
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:32:00 -
[147] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:So care to explain to me in detail what you think was the catalyst for Hillmar's letter? You are going to tell me that "people whined" and therefore CCP listened?
I never said anything about that. Where me and you differ is this theory of yours that every single person who is for and against this are all easily generalized about.
When a thread months ago asked what people thought the next expansion should be i responded that it should be something that justifies the existence of the QC. Now the CQ is going to be absolutely useless for god knows how long. That is, in a nutshell, my problem with this announcement. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:35:00 -
[148] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Bane Necran wrote:So, i guess it's time dilation for the winter expansion, then? Please that vocal minority who never shut up about lag in large fleet battles?
I imagine the majority of the playerbase who exist in hisec will be equally pleased. High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content. It is about damn time you lost your virginity already. I thought EVE was a sandbox? You can call 0.0 "Endgame" but that would be a stretch. Whats Endgame for a pirate? Whats Endgame for a Market Tycoon? Whats Endgame for an Industrialists? Whats Endgame for a mission runner? What's Engame for Miner? If Im playing WoW, I know exactly what Endgame is. If I'm playing EVE, Endgame is whatever YOU want it to be, thus the Beauty of the Sandbox that is EVE.
I said end-game content.
Endgame content for a merket tycoon? I don't know.. selling super capital components with your own BPO's? Where will those be used? 0.0 For industrialists? Fabricating the above? Endgame for a mission runner? NPC 0.0 missions. Endgame for Miner? WH mining. Endgame for a pirate? Killing ratting moms in 0.0 alone.
Those are the things from where you can progress no further in your chosen profession. Therefore, endgame.
Unless you plan to run level 4 missions in high-sec forever? Get enough money to buy a fully officer fit 30b worth paladin with max skills? Now what?
Endgame in EVE is about interacting with people. PVP, if you will. Because there is no end to PVP. PVP is where the true sandbox lies, where people take hold of their own destinies. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

smoopmeister
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:39:00 -
[149] - Quote
Mystic5hadow wrote:[quote=Alua Oresson]... They should have just made their intention clear like so "Folks, we know you want FiS stuff, so let us just finish up what we're working on for WiS right now so we don't **** off people waiting for the WiS stuff we promised, then we'll get right to this FiS stuff you want, okay? Okay."
That would have made me perfectly happy. TBH, more people want FiS fixes than WiS fluff, we need to see how it integrates for it to be worth the dev time we are essentially paying for and promised by subscribing. They should be developing this alongside expansions we can use now, by all means test stuff on SiSi or the other test server but releasing a single CQ and calling it an expansion is unacceptable. When dust is almost ready to go, they can deploy what they have or make it the next expansion's focus, given it will be usable as they intended it by that time.
Why not forget about WiS, then you're surprised when it does come out followed immediately by disappointment. WiS is a cage inside the sandbox, don't get trapped in it before they finish coding it. |

Tear Miner
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:39:00 -
[150] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Bane Necran wrote:So, i guess it's time dilation for the winter expansion, then? Please that vocal minority who never shut up about lag in large fleet battles?
I imagine the majority of the playerbase who exist in hisec will be equally pleased. High-sec players who live in high-sec for more than 2 years are clueless bears. Null-sec (and to an extent, wormhole space) is where the end-game content is at. Iteration in ANY MMO is about end-game content. It is about damn time you lost your virginity already. I thought EVE was a sandbox? You can call 0.0 "Endgame" but that would be a stretch. Whats Endgame for a pirate? Whats Endgame for a Market Tycoon? Whats Endgame for an Industrialists? Whats Endgame for a mission runner? What's Engame for Miner? If Im playing WoW, I know exactly what Endgame is. If I'm playing EVE, Endgame is whatever YOU want it to be, thus the Beauty of the Sandbox that is EVE. I said end-game content. Endgame content for a merket tycoon? I don't know.. selling super capital components with your own BPO's? Where will those be used? 0.0 For industrialists? Fabricating the above? Endgame for a mission runner? NPC 0.0 missions. Endgame for Miner? WH mining. Endgame for a pirate? Killing ratting moms in 0.0 alone. Those are the things from where you can progress no further in your chosen profession. Therefore, endgame. Unless you plan to run level 4 missions in high-sec forever? Get enough money to buy a fully officer fit 30b worth paladin with max skills? Now what? Endgame in EVE is about interacting with people. PVP, if you will. Because there is no end to PVP. PVP is where the true sandbox lies, where people take hold of their own destinies.
Your posting confirms to me that all you do is cry and make tired arguments over and over again.
Stop. Posting. |
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:40:00 -
[151] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:So care to explain to me in detail what you think was the catalyst for Hillmar's letter? You are going to tell me that "people whined" and therefore CCP listened? I never said anything about that. Where me and you differ is this theory of yours that every single person who is for and against this are all easily generalized about. When a thread months ago asked what people thought the next expansion should be i responded that it should be something that justifies the existence of the QC. Now the CQ is going to be absolutely useless for god knows how long. That is, in a nutshell, my problem with this announcement.
You see, the problem was releasing CQ in the first place. It wasn't ready, it is still not ready, and CCP probably realized that they could not finish it until the end of the year not even if they dedicated their full resources to it. Why do you think we still have no idea what estabilishments will do/look like? Even though these were supposedly still in development one week ago and suppoed to be released in winter?
And the god damned subscriptions dropped with incarna. You don't need to have me produce tangible proof to you right now. Just go to the login-screen at peak time and look for yourself at what i'm talking about.
Was incarna the sole cause? No. Incarna was but the last straw.
Tear Miner wrote:Your posting confirms to me that all you do is cry and make tired arguments over and over again.
Stop. Posting.
Hehe, i am not crying. I am happy. I am trying show you people why you shouldn't be crying.
I am getting what me and pretty much the majority of EVE vets have been asking for god knows how long. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Bane Necran
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:41:00 -
[152] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Endgame in EVE is about interacting with people. PVP, if you will. Because there is no end to PVP. PVP is where the true sandbox lies, where people take hold of their own destinies.
The gear grind in WoW is similarly endless, and comprises what they consider endgame. Similarly, collecting things in EVE is the endgame of a player named Entity.
Like he said before, you can't just dictate how other people play the game in a sandbox, and force them into what the endgame is for you, just like you can't say everyone who thinks a certain thing are all identical people. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:43:00 -
[153] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Endgame in EVE is about interacting with people. PVP, if you will. Because there is no end to PVP. PVP is where the true sandbox lies, where people take hold of their own destinies. The gear grind in WoW is similarly endless, and comprises what they consider endgame. Similarly, collecting things in EVE is the endgame of a player named Entity. Like he said before, you can't just dictate how other people play the game in a sandbox, and force them into what the endgame is for you, just like you can't say everyone who thinks a certain thing are all identical people.
Ok, i can agree with that.
Although i seem to have lost track of what your complaints are? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:44:00 -
[154] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:(...) 1: Tie into and ENHANCE current PVP and PVE content. Preferably affecting not only things like manufacturing, working the market, and agent missions... but also provide tangible benefits to PVP activities (whether in planning, making treaties, gathering intel, etc.).
To put it blunty.. I am pissed off that pew-pewers always ***** and whine for EVEN MORE stuff for THEIR gameplay. They should go play WoT if they just want to blow somebody else's stuff forever with no other goal than keep blowing somebody else's stuff.
I should had never left X3: Reunion |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:47:00 -
[155] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:(...) 1: Tie into and ENHANCE current PVP and PVE content. Preferably affecting not only things like manufacturing, working the market, and agent missions... but also provide tangible benefits to PVP activities (whether in planning, making treaties, gathering intel, etc.). To put it blunty.. I am pissed off that pew-pewers always ***** and whine for EVEN MORE stuff for THEIR gameplay. They should go play WoT if they just want to blow somebody else's stuff forever with no other goal than keep blowing somebody else's stuff.
Because unless you are one, you cannot fathom how neglected and poorly treated our gameplay has been for the past 3 years.
I don't run incursions, i don't play planetville, and i'm not alice in the wonderland. Its been years since i've seen proper content applied to my gameplay.
You say we want EVEN MORE stuff for our gameplay. Are you serious? We want more stuff, of course, like everyone do. But our complaints are over the LITTLE WE HAVE is in dire need of fixing for OVER THREE DAMNED YEARS.
THREE BLOODY YEARS of absolutely NOTHING. And those of you who live in high-sec?
Incursions? Mission Buff? C3 wormholes with static high-sec entrance with high-end ore? And we? Nothing was fixed, content we haven't asked for has been introduced (severely unballanced i might add), things we once had got nerfed while YOUR gameplay got BUFFED. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Aerilis
Quantum Cats Syndicate
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:51:00 -
[156] - Quote
The problem here is that you are one of the very small minority that has more than a passing interest in Incarna. CCP was slated to push forward Incarna features and introduce establishments in the winter expansion, but (fortunately) have reconsidered their priorities after months of very vocal complaints from their playerbase.
So now no, there will almost certainly not be establishments in the winter expansion (and good riddance). |

Tarsas Phage
Gank Bangers Moar Tears
20
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:51:00 -
[157] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote: WIS and FIS are not mutually exclusive
They indeed are when you have a finite amount of development time and resources to put towards it.
For those of you who have been living under a rock, especially during the past year, it has boiled down to this:
Option A: Continue full-steam with WiS-related features which will take several seasons (expansions) to fully conceptualize, implement and mature and the cost of development time being devoted to anything other than WiS
Option B: Put Incarna in its current public form in stasis and focus resources on FiS again, while working out the concepts and basic implementation of WiS features in the background.
As of yesterday, CCP has chosen (B), to resounding applause from many.
Had (A) happened, you would likely see a slow trickle of partially implemented WiS features (Only 1 racial CQ, anyone?) over the course of who knows how many expansions, and it would be the equivalent of Chinnese Water Torture whether you're a WiS fan or not. The FiS camp would abandon the game even more, and then it would be the WiS gang's turn to take their place and start giving CCP ultimatums regarding half-finished features, underdeveloped ideas, or needed fixes.
I'm not being cynical, I'm being honest.
CCP has a wonderful opportunity now and they've taken it. Fix and develop several years' worth of FiS backlog, while doing the Right Thing regarding WiS and letting concepts and implentation mature instead of hurrying something out the door.
|

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:55:00 -
[158] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Endgame content for a merket tycoon? I don't know.. selling super capital components with your own BPO's? Where will those be used? 0.0 For industrialists? Fabricating the above? Endgame for a mission runner? NPC 0.0 missions. Endgame for Miner? WH mining. Endgame for a pirate? Killing ratting moms in 0.0 alone.
You're just arbitrarily assuming that whatever happens where you hang out must be the end game... The end game for a market tycoon could be getting together $100b, and they could probably accomplish that most easily in hi sec. The end game for an industrialist could be cornering the market on a high volume item rather than a high value item. The end game for a mission runner could be soloing level 5 missions in space that is crawling with pirates, which means low sec. For a miner it could be coordinating a vast network of miners in hi sec. Etc.
You're right that some players get stuck in hi sec and can't really see that there is more game outside of the area they're comfortable with. That seems to have happened to you with sov null sec. |

Bane Necran
69
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 06:58:00 -
[159] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Ok, i can agree with that.
Although i seem to have lost track of what your complaints are?
I'm not really complaining about things so far, but i'm about to, as i also agree with you.
Renan Ruivo wrote:You see, the problem was releasing CQ in the first place.
I'd agree with that, and i think Hilmar even admitted as much in his blog.
But i'd take it even further to cover all of Incarna. Something they've been teasing us with for many years now, and are showing themselves to be be incapable of providing in any reasonable timeframe. They should have just never hyped it in the first place, and dropped it on us all when it was finally ready, or very near ready, and i mean, ready, ready. Not constantly giving the impression they've done lots of work on it, then later admitting how far very behind they are. Some of us, even non hisec bears, have been really looking forward to it, and it's disheartening to have it yanked away over and over.
I await these new vague 'space combat' things, but they'll have to be pretty goddamned impressive for me to stick around until more of incarna is released, because that's what i'm truly waiting for. It's not that i hate flying in space, it's just that i've done lots of that already, and want something new. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:00:00 -
[160] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Endgame content for a merket tycoon? I don't know.. selling super capital components with your own BPO's? Where will those be used? 0.0 For industrialists? Fabricating the above? Endgame for a mission runner? NPC 0.0 missions. Endgame for Miner? WH mining. Endgame for a pirate? Killing ratting moms in 0.0 alone. You're just arbitrarily assuming that whatever happens where you hang out must be the end game... The end game for a market tycoon could be getting together $100b, and they could probably accomplish that most easily in hi sec. The end game for an industrialist could be cornering the market on a high volume item rather than a high value item. The end game for a mission runner could be soloing level 5 missions in space that is crawling with pirates, which means low sec. For a miner it could be coordinating a vast network of miners in hi sec. Etc. You're right that some players get stuck in hi sec and can't really see that there is more game outside of the area they're comfortable with. That seems to have happened to you with sov null sec.
I'm not talking about people's ultimate goal in the game. I am talking about a tangible glass ceiling.
You can aim at getting 100b.. 110b.. 1 trillion.. thats fine and dandy.. all possible.
But if you aim at building supercap components.. and you achieve that goal. Now what? If you aim at completing NPC 0.0 missions, and you complete them all.. now what?
If i conquer all of 0.0 sov. Now what? Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:08:00 -
[161] - Quote
Bane Necran wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Ok, i can agree with that.
Although i seem to have lost track of what your complaints are? I'm not really complaining about things so far, but i'm about to, as i also agree with you. Renan Ruivo wrote:You see, the problem was releasing CQ in the first place. I'd agree with that, and i think Hilmar even admitted as much in his blog. But i'd take it even further to cover all of Incarna. Something they've been teasing us with for many years now, and are showing themselves to be be incapable of providing in any reasonable timeframe. They should have just never hyped it in the first place, and dropped it on us all when it was finally ready, or very near ready, and i mean, ready, ready. Not constantly giving the impression they've done lots of work on it, then later admitting how far very behind they are. Some of us, even non hisec bears, have been really looking forward to it, and it's disheartening to have it yanked away over and over. I await these new vague 'space combat' things, but they'll have to be pretty goddamned impressive for me to stick around until more of incarna is released, because that's what i'm truly waiting for. It's not that i hate flying in space, it's just that i've done lots of that already, and want something new.
And this is exactly my point and many other FiS lovers as well (Even those who say they couldn't care less about WiS).
The problem is that we want incarna and we want better FiS. With focus on FiS, proper iteration of it can be done in short order if properly adressed. With focus on WiS, it will be a long and painfull road (or chinese torture, as the other guy put it) and a really long time before any tangible content is present.
So i would rather prefer that CCP focuses on something that they can deliver NOW, instead of focusing on something that they will take probably more than one year to deliver. And that is the proper way to tackle development. Otherwise we get stuck with a game that has FiS issues that need to be adressed, and WiS features that take forever to appear.
Finish the backlog of FiS issues first, then add what is most needed. Then you can go Incarna full speed. Tackle development from easiest and mostly needed to hardest and mos ambitious. Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:09:00 -
[162] - Quote
Juil wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Just incase there was any uncertainty, yes, we are refocussing on spaceships, but don't put your spacelegs away just yet, they will be needed  Why so you can promise more stuff and then 'push it away' when you miss your deadlines? Since 2006 you have been promising Ambulation as it was back then, then the last 2 fan fests you've been hyping about incarna.. you've told us that we would finally be given the keys to the station that we could interact in a avatar.. that we could leave the ship and start to explore the OTHER side of eve.. and that you would be giving us the tools to make what we wished of it... Now your saying sorry summer expansion was a big aprils fools joke.. and once again we are not finishing and deliviering on what we have promsied. And yes I know people are going to flame me for this but I was looking forward to Incarna in it's full not for what it is at the moment.. but for what it promised.. Making more of the EVE SANDBOX into an actual SANDBOX. I love my Space Ships, but I also love being able to escape from that reality and Incarna if it was anything like they had hyped on about at fanfest would have given you something akin to what Second Life has managed.. only with better content and better graphics. People seem to think that because there is no 'actual' solid game play defined by CCP that sorry it's not a feature.. but that's the point, Eve is not meant to be 'this is how you play, this is what you do and that is that' Eve is meant to be a Sandbox, it's meant to be 'here are the tools, go and make the game play you want'... and Incarna had the hint of that finally TRUELY becoming something.. from being able to put tattoo's all over my Avatar's body, to making an establishment to finally maybe making all those worthless dancers I have useful etc.. It had the possiblity of opening up entire new Industrial area's for those who are Industrialists... manufacturing entire new sets of items for the AVATAR side of the game.. and yet instead we got NeX and now we get yet another dropped expansion.. half finished and from CCP's track record.. never to BE finished. Thanks for lieing for the past several years CCP.. and for getting peoples hopes up at a fantastic feature only to again scrap it.
i could not write it better... 
EVE is not being killed with expansions... EVE is being killed because of lies and lack of promised expansions / promised expansion contents...
|

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:21:00 -
[163] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:I'm not talking about people's ultimate goal in the game. I am talking about a tangible glass ceiling.
You can aim at getting 100b.. 110b.. 1 trillion.. thats fine and dandy.. all possible.
But if you aim at building supercap components.. and you achieve that goal. Now what? If you aim at completing NPC 0.0 missions, and you complete them all.. now what?
If i conquer all of 0.0 sov. Now what?
If your aim is building supercap components, yeah, you need to have some relation to sov 0.0. But that isn't everybody's aim. You could just as easily say "once you've cornered the market on tritanium there isn't really anything else to accomplish".
Some people like being part of a big alliance, some people like striking out on their own. Some people like tweaky optimization of fine details, some people like big explosions. Some people like cooperation, some people like competition. Some people want to be a small part of a big alliance, some people want to see what they can accomplish with just a couple buddies. Depending on what your druthers are, your end game might be in a different type of space. Plenty of people try out a 0.0 alliance and find it dull and less challenging than other things they've tried, so they leave and go pursue those other goals instead. At the same time, plenty of people find being in a 0.0 alliance to be the most exciting and challenging part of the game, so for them, that's the end game. It's just different preferences, it's not a heirarchy.
I dunno. One of the things I like most about eve is that there isn't a single end game. There are players just as skilled and experienced playing out at the bleeding edge of perfecting low sec piracy, working the market in jita, exploring, in faction warfare, wherever you look. It isn't like wow where there is one clear end game and everybody gets funneled into that. Yeah, you're right, that makes development planning easier when you set a game up that way, but IMO it makes the game boring too. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:22:00 -
[164] - Quote
I seem to have posted from a wrong standing point here.. i though people were mad because CCP is now turning their eyes to FIXING HYBRIDS K THX.
But it seems that people have finally realized that Incarna was not released this summer and would not be released this winter.
I share your pain (also wanted WiS), and i also regret that you cannot be consolated by the fixes and changes that they actually are bringing this winter.
Take this as you will: "C'est la vie" Sometimes the only difference between a budding genius and a blooming idiot is where they chose to take a stand. |

Jada Maroo
Mysterium Astrometrics BRABODEN
204
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:24:00 -
[165] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun.
You know what makes not-fun things fun?
Guns.
There you go.
Just saved CCP hundreds of thousands in consultants and marketing research. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
38
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:27:00 -
[166] - Quote
Not to step on toes, but there is no end game in EVE.
That's rather the whole point of this game in a way.
Yes, you can master whatever you are currently doing in game eventually.
Yes, you can leverage your skills to put you on top of the heap in your chosen profession if you are good enough.
But if you grow bored with that, and eventually you will, there are countless other interesting aspects to the game you can immerse yourself in.
And no, 0.0 is not definitively the end game of EVE either. Yes, there are things you can do there that you can't do anywhere else in EVE... but that being said there are many an old bitter vet that burned out on that whole scene and moved back to empire to pursue another lifestyle (whether that be industrialist, manufacturer, marketeer, mercenary, loyalist in FW, explorer, or pirate).
You both have some valid points, I'm not trying to say otherwise, but there is more to it than that. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Viribus
Bear Force One Elite Space Guild
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 07:43:00 -
[167] - Quote
The dudes who join for WiS probably wouldn't have stuck around, even if incarna were actually what it was envisioned to be. Even with bustling markets full of drug dealers and sex slaves WiS will only ever be there to supplement the actual spaceship game, not be a replacement for it. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
84
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:07:00 -
[168] - Quote
as far i understood answer to the OP question is no Hilmar in his letter stated that they will expand on WIS when it is done and when it has a meaningful use in EVE
And to be honest i don't see any meaningful use of establishments at the moment and knowing how long it took to make CQ i don't think we will see any exapnsion on CQ, except for the racial CQ s this year or the first 6 months of 2012
Goons Delenda Est I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
136
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:31:00 -
[169] - Quote
Forums ate my post (again)
Short version:
Jade Constantine is right
Excluding players input in a game like eve is a dead end
Players should be able to find items in stocks while doing missions, dead space complexes and creating them in one way or another selling those on to guys who have establishments. Thus creating an economy. Not unlike the gold mining in the 1800's. (reference to aurum yes).
- Blood raider uniforms and pirate hats, etc from missions/plexes
- executive skirts, boots, etc made by professions (with poly textiles and what not from PI)
- Dress Uniforms , ceremonial swords/khumaak, etc from faction warfare
All items should have flair, character and avoid to be to bland (like today)
There should be different clothing stores, tatoo parlours, hairdressers, manned by NPC's (slaves in Amarr) but doing the work you pay them for through your rent, buying extra tatoo's and clothes from guys who went out and found them. Mid level buyers would even be created to sell in bulk to big players/shops.
Illegal items would be smuggled in though low sec to be sold there to more seedy establishments/bars and backdoor deals like establishments. Incarna needs to be done when it is done, and not a second earlier. And as it seems completly redesigned. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
356
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:46:00 -
[170] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Forums ate my post (again)
Short version:
Jade Constantine is right
Excluding players input in a game like eve is a dead end
Players should be able to find items in stocks while doing missions, dead space complexes and creating them in one way or another selling those on to guys who have establishments. Thus creating an economy. Not unlike the gold mining in the 1800's. (reference to aurum yes).
- Blood raider uniforms and pirate hats, etc from missions/plexes
- executive skirts, boots, etc made by professions (with poly textiles and what not from PI)
- Dress Uniforms , ceremonial swords/khumaak, etc from faction warfare
All items should have flair, character and avoid to be to bland (like today)
There should be different clothing stores, tatoo parlours, hairdressers, manned by NPC's (slaves in Amarr) but doing the work you pay them for through your rent, buying extra tatoo's and clothes from guys who went out and found them. Mid level buyers would even be created to sell in bulk to big players/shops.
Illegal items would be smuggled in though low sec to be sold there to more seedy establishments/bars and backdoor deals like establishments. Incarna needs to be done when it is done, and not a second earlier. And as it seems completly redesigned.
All this is great stuff.
And you know the real kicker?
If items of clothing and avatar customization WERE actually player discovered/found/manufactured/sold and resold and completely integrated with the Eve economy then nobody would have a problem with them actually having some attributes and in-game effect.
Nightstalker goggles with small bonus to frigate guns? Elaborate dress skirts with a bonus to fast talk? Blood raider ceremonial robes with (shock horror) a bonus to lp for blood raider mission rewards?
Bring these things to the player exploration/production domain and out of the horrible MT/NeX corruption and we can adding actual meaningful items to the database again.
And the stupid thing is that CCP would STILL get some kind of income bump from RL cash rich players buying timecards and selling plex to afford the rarer stuff just like they do currently with pirate implant sets and flashy ships.
Absolutely everybody wins and we preserve the Eve economic sandbox.
Of course designing clothing with in-game attributes rather than out of game $ signs will require giving somebody the job of balancing/coding the bonus levels but how much richer and more immersive would it be deliver content in this way?
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
|

The Snowman
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:47:00 -
[171] - Quote
Personally Ive been waiting for WiS since I started playing in 2005.
When I go reading and writing on other forums where Eve crops up, seems that a lot of non-eve players were all waiting for when that time came also.
I think we all knew it was a pretty bold objective, but we too are used to success from CCP, despite all the whining and moaning and hysteria that a minority of players and CSM cooked up, I honestly expected Hilmar to have the balls to continue with his vision.
Sadly, balls were dropped, future visions deleted. For what? Engine trails and weapon balancing? What a tragedy. |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
94
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:50:00 -
[172] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote: That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
Can i have your stuff !?
|

TriadSte
Thr33lance Incorp
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 08:57:00 -
[173] - Quote
The weapon balancing is a great issue for myself as I began Gallente and I love Gallente ships. My gunnery in Hybrids is perfect so when CCP balance the weapons I use its gonna feel great.
Its also about time that CCP did this so that the Gallente race is on a more even keel to other races. I feel its unfair to have 1 race out of 4 to be at a loss when compared to its rivals. Gallente can be kited to hell and back pretty much.
I also want WIS but I feel that fixing the game first be priority with the Incarna team working behind closed doors, so when its time to get rid of that door its done in style and success.
The one thing I do want to see which CCP have tried many time is easier 0.0 access for people not common to null. Along with 0.0 not having all the goodies :
1. Ice not to be moved to low / null
2. Higher plexs in empire maybe all the way to 10/10 just with much lower drop rates with same pay as a lvl 4 mission. This would again create another team play game style because of that slim chance of a nice drop. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
356
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:03:00 -
[174] - Quote
The Snowman wrote:Personally Ive been waiting for WiS since I started playing in 2005.
When I go reading and writing on other forums where Eve crops up, seems that a lot of non-eve players were all waiting for when that time came also.
I think we all knew it was a pretty bold objective, but we too are used to success from CCP, despite all the whining and moaning and hysteria that a minority of players and CSM cooked up, I honestly expected Hilmar to have the balls to continue with his vision.
Sadly, balls were dropped, future visions deleted. For what? Engine trails and weapon balancing? What a tragedy.
oh come on!
its becoming increasingly obvious that incarna as a project was a complete disaster. The technology is a long long way from prime time. Given the performance issues with single characters in pretty empty CQs do you really think this scales properly to multiplayer environment?
Couple that with the reality that there is really not much that can be done with Incarna WiS?
No combat. No gambling. No mirroring of functionality in more cumbersome way (ie no walking up 2 flights of steps to repair your ship)
The vision for Incarna that we've just seen publicly shot in the back of the head was Incarna the vanity item display case and frankly that isn't any kind of a loss for anyone.
Regardless of the specific contents of the winter patch the real importance is whether CCP follows through on Hilmar's promise to do a full reallocation of development effort back to core eve gameplay. If that happens then proper expansions like Exodus and Apocrypha will be back on the table and Eve will truly have a chance to win back the trust and goodwill its lost this last 18 months.
Incarna is a minor feature that got blown out of all proportion through drunken rambling flights of fancy and came to dominate the development of this mmo for FAR TO LONG.
But when push came to shove (and delivery) the reality was there is no real content for it.
The ONLY potential content (the flashy clothes and walking around stuff) was stolen from it by the NeX gurus and crowbarred in as a clusmy MT cash grab/experiment thus rendering Incarna utterly sterile as even a potential expansion because it wasn't content for me and you it was "content" for cash cows and golden geece to bleed their credit cards on.
Honestly screw vanity-only pseudo content in eve, leave that hogwash to wow.
Give us apocrypha-scale expansions twice a year and this game will take off and flourish like you'll never believe.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Juil
Phoenix Industries Pty. Ltd.
26
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:07:00 -
[175] - Quote
Damned Ren doesn't give it a break does he.. if you don't agree with him then he'll try and twist everythign you say.
Look lets face it the problem isn't really that Incarna's been 'canceled' or rather.... that IS the problem, it's yet ANOTHER canceled feature.. another 'failed' expansion, another half assed addition.. and a lot of you are SCREAMING 'YES' because of it.
Hilmar is likely in heaven.. once again he gets to dodge actually completing something... I've been playing this game a long ass time, I've played in High Sec, I've played in Low Sec and I've played in Null Sec.. the only place i've not lived in for a time is WH space, but i've even been there for 'day trips' and I will agree ALL of Eve does need some loving there happy Ren you got it from me, I agree that Flying In Space is important.. but I will NOT agree that doing a 180 and Abandoning an expansion 1/4th complete is the solution..
Why?
Because this is what CCP does each and every expansion, this is what CCP has done since EVE came out.. any other software company would have been dragged out and shot, but saddly there is no other true Internet Flying Spaceship game out there..
You guys all claim Eve is a sandbox.... really? Second Life is a Sandbox... Minecraft is a Sandbox.. These are games/enviroments which give you the tools and tell you to go do what you want with them.. blank slates.. Eve isn't a true sandbox.. does it have the potential to be one? Maybe.. if.. IF CCP ever bothered to give the players the tools, the problem there? Those tools would likely be half finished and dropped 2 months in.
That is what the big complaint now is about, CCP and Hilmar especially have Promised time and time and time again, first it was that Combat was going to be 'greatly' expanded, enviroments where going to actually effect how you played, etc etc etc.. instead we got.. rebalancing, carriers.. and titans.. and more blobs. and then eventually some of what was once mentioned trickled into wormhole space.
We get promised that they are going to revamp null sec combat so that the dreaded gate camp blob becomes less of a problem.. we'll make Sov and the like more 'dynamic' so it feels like massive fleet combat like you see in the fiction and lore.. and we get.. Titans and Super Carriers.. and a sov system that actively promotes gate camping and hot dropping massive blobs onto people..
We get promised a 'Dynamic Factional War System that will make your actions have REAL concequence to the faction you fight for' we get.. well i wouldn't even call it anything like the Battlegrounds or Arena's of most games.. i'd just call it Broke.
We get promised cosmos dungeons and grand new missions.. we get.. broke.
we get promised for 6 years.. yes 6.. 2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010 <-- 6 + 2011 Ambulation.. or as most of you now know it 'Incarna' and what do we get.. one feature the rest dropped.
And all through out all of this we've had Hilmar and Zulu say a number of times 'We have seen the error of our ways' and yet if they have.. Why are we here again? care to explain that one Ren? Oh that's right your too busy suckign up and humping the CCP has backflipped again tree.
It doesn't matter, CCP has created a lot of mistrust and anger with some of it's oldest players now.. and while the CSM can go about trouting they have won the war.. they haven't.. they just put CCP back on the 'old' rails of half assed content, half finished products.
so yeah you have a lot of people who are eye'n this and going ok why do we bother giving our money any more?
and no you can't have our stuff.. we pay our subscription or choose not to because that is OUR right.. remember Hilmar's own words.. Watch what they Do not what they say.. Well their abandoment of yet another promise maens that my accounts got canceled.. why? Because they choose to cancel one 'promise' too many... It doesn't matter that it's Incarna to me though i loved the idea of it.. it could have been 'oh we are cancelling wormhole space' for all i care, it would have caused the same reaction.
Maybe.. MAYBE in December Hilmar will be able to prove he's actually releasing real content and real fixes again, but until then why should I believe him when he's just canceled and failed again? |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
85
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:11:00 -
[176] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I really like the idea aswell but what would people actually sell or do their shouldn't it not be much better if there was actually content to sell or trade or if it had a real meaningfull use in the game , it will jusst take time to develop it
So CCp take your time and if the world doesn't end in 2012 i still will be there to enjoy what is coming I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:15:00 -
[177] - Quote
pussnheels wrote:
I really like the idea aswell but what would people actually sell or do their shouldn't it not be much better if there was actually content to sell or trade or if it had a real meaningfull use in the game , it will jusst take time to develop it
So CCp take your time and if the world doesn't end in 2012 i still will be there to enjoy what is coming
Yeah, Incarna is coming eventually, according to Hilmar. But I don't know how long they are expecting us to wait for it. Or any other of the changes they have promised for that matter. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Sir Substance
Tactical Knightmare
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:15:00 -
[178] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Would it be overly awkward if I were to, like, offer a hug?
It *might* degenerate into leg humping. No promises. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
165
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:55:00 -
[179] - Quote
Personally i am more than happy to wait until CCP have got this one RIGHT,
And by right, i mean the ability to go the the machine "i want this, this, that, this, that and that over there too' and the machine says 'No worries! Here u go'.
Instant feature builder, the mechanics of it all worked out and oiled up.
I also think that machine should: - allow people to use emotes - allow destructable items (glasses, vases) - allow interaction with nearly all objects; brush past a painting on a wall and it tilts, able to drink from a glass, able to have things put into the glass and taken out when drinking - Burn marks from any log fires sending up sparks, or from pistols into the wall, but burn marks disappear after a minute or so? - ability to supply deployable equipment in station; posters for your CQ, Trophies, wine, dancers - all carryable from the point of sale by the avatar to the CQ, indirectly. So able to interact with everything as per normal, but not able to pick up new things (one object at a time?) - Non destructable interactive items: soccer ball on the floor u can kick, droids cleaning the floor etc - Communal voice channel: everyone who comes in is on voice comms, but the volume is automated so 10 meters away from someone you can't hear them, then the closer you get the louder they get. No PTT, but have things like a breaking glass or gunshot hearable for up to 50 meters?
Yes, this is my wish list :) The need for a good engine to make all that happen is pretty important.
Honestly though, any WiS would be awesome. [img]http://i53.tinypic.com/bebnf8.jpg[/img] |

Scitor Nantom
AfterMath. Broken Toys
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 09:58:00 -
[180] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
OOC:
Chalk me up as being very supportive of "establishments" and Walking In Stations. I know, I know, I hear everyone complaining about a need for the focus on space, and the nerd rage about how avatars are for girls, but I totally disagree.
It's disappointing that the station doors will not open before end of year. I am glad that all of the styles of Captains Quarters will be out, but I was looking forward to ambling amongst the masses.
Keep my post in mind when I say that the dynamic screens and avatars are very immersive. I like this direction. I do like that you are focusing on the core elements too... flying in space, faction warfare, etc... but you guys have got me hooked on the "dry" (non amniotic fluid) experience. |
|

Reeno Coleman
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 10:25:00 -
[181] - Quote
No establishments = less overcooked graphics cards |

Forum Bug
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 10:28:00 -
[182] - Quote
Jade Constantine wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Forums ate my post (again)
Short version:
Jade Constantine is right
Excluding players input in a game like eve is a dead end
Players should be able to find items in stocks while doing missions, dead space complexes and creating them in one way or another selling those on to guys who have establishments. Thus creating an economy. Not unlike the gold mining in the 1800's. (reference to aurum yes).
- Blood raider uniforms and pirate hats, etc from missions/plexes
- executive skirts, boots, etc made by professions (with poly textiles and what not from PI)
- Dress Uniforms , ceremonial swords/khumaak, etc from faction warfare
All items should have flair, character and avoid to be to bland (like today)
There should be different clothing stores, tatoo parlours, hairdressers, manned by NPC's (slaves in Amarr) but doing the work you pay them for through your rent, buying extra tatoo's and clothes from guys who went out and found them. Mid level buyers would even be created to sell in bulk to big players/shops.
Illegal items would be smuggled in though low sec to be sold there to more seedy establishments/bars and backdoor deals like establishments. Incarna needs to be done when it is done, and not a second earlier. And as it seems completly redesigned. All this is great stuff. And you know the real kicker? If items of clothing and avatar customization WERE actually player discovered/found/manufactured/sold and resold and completely integrated with the Eve economy then nobody would have a problem with them actually having some attributes and in-game effect. Nightstalker goggles with small bonus to frigate guns? Elaborate dress skirts with a bonus to fast talk? Blood raider ceremonial robes with (shock horror) a bonus to lp for blood raider mission rewards? Bring these things to the player exploration/production domain and out of the horrible MT/NeX corruption and we can adding actual meaningful items to the database again. And the stupid thing is that CCP would STILL get some kind of income bump from RL cash rich players buying timecards and selling plex to afford the rarer stuff just like they do currently with pirate implant sets and flashy ships. Absolutely everybody wins and we preserve the Eve economic sandbox. Of course designing clothing with in-game attributes rather than out of game $ signs will require giving somebody the job of balancing/coding the bonus levels but how much richer and more immersive would it be deliver content in this way?
My god jade you are one sexy individual when you talk in these terms, its a vison that CCP needs. CCP never asked how they could break new ground with this MMO and figure unique "sandboxy" ways to make money. They seemingly hired some marketing guysin a suit who said oh look everyone is offering a bloody MT store lets do that.
This game should always be making history not living it!!!
CCP Listen please
|

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
593
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 10:40:00 -
[183] - Quote
i would just say... CCP disappointed me one more time... i was looking forward to incarna... and now squat... look at this as big picture... we will get few patches (in one whole year) instead of big bang expansion of eve... (CQ are nothing without the rest of incarna)... so much time spent on nothing... and this patches are things that they can do in small time frame so that why we will get them...
and the most sad thing is that all ppl that i managed to invite to EVE... the last click before they said yes and created account was incarna and what i could be... now there is big chance that they are gone... ...and its so hard to get rl friends to EVE... |

cBOLTSON
Star Frontiers BricK sQuAD.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:15:00 -
[184] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Good man. First thankyou for being honest. Secondly its not that we DONT want multiplayer incarna, im sure it would be intresting. We just do not want a half finished product and im sure you guys understand this.
For me and for most of my corp and alliance we are more intrested in SPACE updates and fixes so make this winter expansion one that mabye will restore our faith in you ccp. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:21:00 -
[185] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:i would just say... CCP disappointed me one more time... i was looking forward to incarna... and now squat... look at this as big picture... we will get few patches (in one whole year) instead of big bang expansion of eve... (CQ are nothing without the rest of incarna)... so much time spent on nothing... and this patches are things that they can do in small time frame so that why we will get them... and the most sad thing is that all ppl that i managed to invite to EVE... the last click before they said yes and created account was incarna and what i could be... now there is big chance that they are gone...  ...and its so hard to get rl friends to EVE...
Well, my friends will not leave because of Incarna not coming in the so-called "Winter Expansion" patch. We usually fly together in space almost every day and they have become quite addicted.
But just to illustrate for those who do not understand the fascination WiS has on many people: - 2 of them played STO and RIFT before, 1 STO and AION. 2 came from WOW/LOTRO. All STO players agreed that EVE was the better SciFi Game, but all only joined after they introduced avatars and made the promise that said avatars could soon meet. Understand it or do not. It doesn't matter.
- First reaction when I told them that there would be no Establishments, not even a meet-in-person option, but instead what was on the list:
One said: "Well, at least a reason to look forward to SWTOR again." The reactions of the rest were more or less: "Oh, this is an expansion? Looks like patches." All were very disappointed. All will probably stay in EVE, because we like to fly together. But I'm not so sure they will want to "just fly" forever without any chance of social interaction you have in any other game. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:24:00 -
[186] - Quote
Tarsas Phage wrote:Raven Aldura wrote: WIS and FIS are not mutually exclusive
They indeed are when you have a finite amount of development time and resources to put towards it.
If I have $10 and I want some widget A and some widget B, I can buy $5 of each. And what do you consider finite time? CCP has put 5 years into WIS. That doesn't sound like they are too worried about time constraints. |

Crucis Cassiopeiae
EvE-COM
593
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:36:00 -
[187] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:i would just say... CCP disappointed me one more time... i was looking forward to incarna... and now squat... look at this as big picture... we will get few patches (in one whole year) instead of big bang expansion of eve... (CQ are nothing without the rest of incarna)... so much time spent on nothing... and this patches are things that they can do in small time frame so that why we will get them... and the most sad thing is that all ppl that i managed to invite to EVE... the last click before they said yes and created account was incarna and what i could be... now there is big chance that they are gone...  ...and its so hard to get rl friends to EVE... Well, my friends will not leave because of Incarna not coming in the so-called "Winter Expansion" patch. We usually fly together in space almost every day and they have become quite addicted. But just to illustrate for those who do not understand the fascination WiS has on many people: - 2 of them played STO and RIFT before, 1 STO and AION. 2 came from WOW/LOTRO. All STO players agreed that EVE was the better SciFi Game, but all only joined after they introduced avatars and made the promise that said avatars could soon meet. Understand it or do not. It doesn't matter. - First reaction when I told them that there would be no Establishments, not even a meet-in-person option, but instead what was on the list: One said: "Well, at least a reason to look forward to SWTOR again." The reactions of the rest were more or less: "Oh, this is an expansion? Looks like patches." All were very disappointed. All will probably stay in EVE, because we like to fly together. But I'm not so sure they will want to "just fly" forever without any chance of social interaction you have in any other game.
I understand their reaction very well... and i think that 1 year before SWTOR is released EVE could not allow itself not to have any expansion... just patches... but this is EVE with CCP developing it... and here is everything possible... they promised incarna for 5 years and nothing... now we will see how number of players go down when SWTOR lunches... |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:48:00 -
[188] - Quote
Well, personally I think that EVE and SWTOR are totally different games. I know most of our group will play both EVE & SWTOR. But it will show how much time will be spent in EVE and how much time in SWTOR.
A few weeks ago, when WiS was still confidently announced to get meeting options in winter, many said: "Perhaps I don't even play SWTOR."
Now the "spaceship only" thing is back on the table. I guess people want to stretch their legs... ;) In the end the old guard will not leave EVE I think, but they will lose many of the new players that were intrigued by Incarna. I'm especially sure they will lose a lot of new female players. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
368
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:50:00 -
[189] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:i would just say... CCP disappointed me one more time... i was looking forward to incarna... and now squat... look at this as big picture... we will get few patches (in one whole year) instead of big bang expansion of eve... (CQ are nothing without the rest of incarna)... so much time spent on nothing... and this patches are things that they can do in small time frame so that why we will get them...
A vintage racing car mechanic starts building a 1/20th scale replica of the Empire State building in his back garden. 1st year he lays the foundations. 2nd year he rips them up and changes the depth of the concrete. 3rd year he goes back to the drawing board and redesigns it as the eiffel tower. 4th year he plans to hire out the (yet unfinished) tower as a carnivale ride. 5th year he starts building the thing and it collapses into a neighbours hedge.
His neighbours come round, make him a cup of a tea, pat him on the back and say "why don't you get back to restoring cooper 500s and forget about that tower entirely? We love your damn cars to death!"
Quote:.... and the most sad thing is that all ppl that i managed to invite to EVE... the last click before they said yes and created account was incarna and what i could be... now there is big chance that they are gone...  ...and its so hard to get rl friends to EVE...
Anybody who would would have stayed in Eve as a result of what Incarna CQ's + content arid Establishments could deliver is in serious need of some proper fps gaming.
If I want to play with an avatar I load up Space Marine / Rage / Borderlands / Fallout or something of that kind.
Eve is spaceships. The people I've successfully introduced to this game are the kind of gamers that liked Elite, Freespace, Independence War, Homeworld, Master of Orion, Supreme Commander or going back a bit further - Battletech, Star Fleet Battles, Full Thrust, - that kind of thing.
Its a game for spaceship nerds of both sexes that really like lasers, siege misssles, deep space exploration and star-wars esq fleet battles and skirmishes.
Its not (and likely never will be) wow in space because the avatar part will not have any action gameplay.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

Svennig
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:51:00 -
[190] - Quote
Crucis Cassiopeiae wrote:i would just say... CCP disappointed me one more time... i was looking forward to incarna... and now squat... look at this as big picture... we will get few patches (in one whole year) instead of big bang expansion of eve... (CQ are nothing without the rest of incarna)... so much time spent on nothing... and this patches are things that they can do in small time frame so that why we will get them... and the most sad thing is that all ppl that i managed to invite to EVE... the last click before they said yes and created account was incarna and what i could be... now there is big chance that they are gone...  ...and its so hard to get rl friends to EVE...
It's not gone. This expansion they're going to focus on FiS while they perfect the technology for WiS. This is absolutely positively the best of both worlds, by far. We get a good expansion of WiS content which fixes some serious issues in the game, and then in the new year they can look to actually making a real incarna, based on a rock-solid tuned platform with lots of reusable graphics content that they can take and throw into establishments, different/bigger quarters, whatever.
My issue has never been with incarna. It's been with doing incarna while the rest of the game is broken. Once they've fixed the game, incarna is going to be awesome. I mean you've seen the fuckin Gallente quarters right? Just think of the amount of content that they'll be able to make in that graphic style. I'm semi-hard just thinking about it. And it'll be based on a more-mature technology.
CCP: Thankyou. Incarna will have its day, but the focus of this expansion on space issues is spot on. |
|

Zagdul
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
46
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:57:00 -
[191] - Quote
Thanks for taking your time on establishments.
However, I'd personally be happy if you were able to release the promenade area for social gatherings.
I'm starting to get cabin fever.
:)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoOyvRTA2Ps&feature=related
It's not Rocket Surgery |

betoli
Between the lines
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:57:00 -
[192] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun.
Yes I think there is support for it. But CCP haven't exactly been forthcoming on what ideas they have about gameplay. You guys need to put some stuff on the table, tell us whats possible, whats not, and what your thinking of putting in. Otherwise we'll be in the same place in 12 months time as we are now! Quite frankly it looks like there is a shortage of creative ideas that would make WiS worthwhile and get the large number of grumblers thinking its a good idea....
|

Slade Trillgon
Endless Possibilities Inc.
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 11:58:00 -
[193] - Quote
Since pretty much every opinion has been stated I will try a little humour 
KhaelaMensha Khaine wrote:you know where the door is. :)
I am not sure that they know where the door is.
They actually use the captain quarters 
Spinning avatar on line 
Slade
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
50
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 12:53:00 -
[194] - Quote
Aw you made me sad.
By reminding me what was once promised  I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 13:02:00 -
[195] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Aw you made me sad. By reminding me what was once promised 
The date on that video causes me physical pain :P |

Amro One
One.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 13:32:00 -
[196] - Quote
EVE = Internet Barbie in spaceships
Still have no idea why all those who hate CQ complain about graphic cards cooking when they never uses it. ???
|

Alaizabel Bronstein
United Engineering Services
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 13:51:00 -
[197] - Quote
Scitor Nantom wrote:Keep my post in mind when I say that the dynamic screens and avatars are very immersive. I like this direction. I do like that you are focusing on the core elements too... flying in space, faction warfare, etc... but you guys have got me hooked on the "dry" (non amniotic fluid) experience. Consider that for many players "non-immersion" has become a cherished feature of EVE.
One of the things that really sets EVE apart from other games is the ease with which we create, trash, buy, sell, burn our characters - an attitude that contributes a lot to the metagaming aspect of EVE.
If people would suddenly start to identify with their characters instead of viewing them as (ultimately disposable) assets & tools EVE would change a lot.
I believe EVE would have developed into a very different environment if we had started with avatars from day one (instead of "being" a ship that looks the same no matter which character pilots it) and I am not sure I would prefer that version of EVE to the current one. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
335
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:02:00 -
[198] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:If I have $10 and I want some widget A and some widget B, I can buy $5 of each. Only if they're sold in $1 or $5 packets. Unfortunately, there is a $10 minimum buy-in in this caseGǪ GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:40:00 -
[199] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Raven Aldura wrote:If I have $10 and I want some widget A and some widget B, I can buy $5 of each. Only if they're sold in $1 or $5 packets. Unfortunately, there is a $10 minimum buy-in in this caseGǪ
Incorrect, arbitrary, and without support. Thanks for nothing. If you want to play again, we accept logic, reasoning, and/or material support. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
335
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:46:00 -
[200] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:Incorrect No. Development resources are not infinitely divisible and have mandatory overhead costs. It was your analogy, so that's your problem. GǪapart from reality.
Quote:If you want to play again, we accept logic, reasoning, and/or material support. Then maybe you should present some rather than your dribble. GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
|

Captain Megadeath
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 14:50:00 -
[201] - Quote
Slade Trillgon wrote:Since pretty much every opinion has been stated I will try a little humour  KhaelaMensha Khaine wrote:you know where the door is. :) I am not sure that they know where the door is. They actually use the captain quarters  Spinning avatar on line  Slade
I find your comments laughable considering the biggest complaint from the "FiS" crowd was that they were unable to spin their ship. 
Pot - kettle - black methinks, but do continue..........  |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:03:00 -
[202] - Quote
Thats alot of words to confirm you have no support for your argument.
I will agree that development resources are not infinitely divisible and have overhead costs. You will have to be more specific than that in regards to CCP and establishments before you will convince anyone that that is the problem.
My analogy can be explained thus: $10 is CCP development budget. Widget A is development cost for WIS, Widget B is development cost for FIS. Your analogy falls apart when you state that these are mutually exclusive. I'm saying that you need more support than simply stating it as such.
When someone says your point is lacking, you should sometimes defend rather than going on the offensive. Our ability to reach some agreeable conclusion will come much faster that way. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
335
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:11:00 -
[203] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:Thats alot of words to confirm you have no support for your argument. You mean besides basic maths?
No, you can't buy $5 worth of A and $5 worth of B unless A and B are available in $1 or $5 packets.
Quote:You will have to be more specific than that in regards to CCP and establishments before you will convince anyone that that is the problem. Go back and read the various blog posts about how CCP develops EVE. It's amply explained there.
Quote:Your analogy falls apart when you state that these are mutually exclusive. Good thing I didn't say that then.
Quote:When someone says your point is lacking, you should sometimes defend rather than going on the offensive. When someone is offensive, I tell them to sod off, because that is the only answer they deserve.
Oh, and just so you know, you haven't provided any support for your analogy either, and it is entirely arbitrary as constructed. Stones and glass houses and all that, you knowGǪ? So yeah, you did indeed use a lot of words to confirm that you have no support for your argument. Fancy thatGǪ GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:26:00 -
[204] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Raven Aldura wrote:Thats alot of words to confirm you have no support for your argument. You mean besides basic maths? No, you can't buy $5 worth of A and $5 worth of B unless A and B are available in $1 or $5 packets. Quote:You will have to be more specific than that in regards to CCP and establishments before you will convince anyone that that is the problem. Go back and read the various blog posts about how CCP develops EVE. It's amply explained there. Quote:Your analogy falls apart when you state that these are mutually exclusive. Good thing I didn't say that then. Quote:When someone says your point is lacking, you should sometimes defend rather than going on the offensive. When someone is offensive, I tell them to sod off, because that is the only answer they deserve. Oh, and just so you know, you haven't provided any support for your analogy either, and it is entirely arbitrary as constructed. Stones and glass houses and all that, you knowGǪ? So yeah, you did indeed use a lot of words to confirm that you have no support for your argument. Fancy thatGǪ
You said that there was a "$10 buy in" meaning that $5 packets were not availible, that was stating that the budgets were mutually exclusive.
Also, "go read some others posts" does not make good support.
I will contend that after 3 posts you have still not offered any support for your points, you concede the arguement regardless of your willingness to admit it.
ps. breaking down each point I make into a separate quote block would like to be left back in 2004 where you found it. |

Iosue
Black Sky Hipsters
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:31:00 -
[205] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
This is what I needed to hear, I will resub my four accounts once again. Though I normally use the annual subs, I'm going to use the 6 month option this time, so that I can evaluate the winter expansion before signing up for a full year. Hope you guys are serious about FiS; bugfixing, refining and adding new content (don't forget about us indy guys!). |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
335
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:37:00 -
[206] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:You said that there was a "$10 buy in" meaning that $5 packets were not availible, that was stating that the budgets were mutually exclusive. Only if your total budget is $10. If you want to claim that it is, then yes, they are indeed mutually exclusive.
The point here is that you are making the unsupported assumption that the division of labour you're proposing is at all possible. As this whole d+¬b+ócle has show, that is not really the case. Anyone who has been reading the devblogs that have been published over the last couple of years on the topic of allocation of resources and workload won't be particularly surprised by this fact.
Quote:I will contend that after 3 posts you have still not offered any support for your points GǪaside from the reality that is before us and the long history behind it. Your unwillingness to research the matter is not a lack of proof. You, on the other hand, has nothing to support your arguments or assumptions.
Quote:breaking down each point I make into a separate quote block Is good manners because it clearly connects each answer to the point that is being addressed.
So, really, the question is this: what do you base the idea that you can spend $5 on A and $5 on B on? GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
457
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 15:40:00 -
[207] - Quote
If a woman can make a baby in 9 months, 4 women can make 2 babys in 4.5 months.
Proved by the power of maths! Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:23:00 -
[208] - Quote
Tippia wrote:
So, really, the question is this: what do you base the idea that you can spend $5 on A and $5 on B on?
I assume you mean why did I say $10 as opposed to another amount? I work in accounting and finance and when we set budgets we allocate different amounts to different projects, as does CCP:
http://eve-search.com/thread/1541173
CCP has a development budget and it can allocate based on large projects or small feature sets. Now things like personnel do come into play, but we don't have the insight to judge that ourselves. It could very likely be that I am wrong and they view these projects, WIS and FIS, as mutually exclusive, but based on my experience in budgets (which I will admit, is limited compared to some), I don't think its beyond the realm of possibility to do both.
Your "read some threads" idea of support has morphed into "read some dev blogs". It hasn't gotten any better. Which dev blogs? Which parts of these dev blogs? Quotes maybe?
The reason why quote blocks are not optimal is that, if we both use them, the thread becomes a mess and readability suffers. |

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:29:00 -
[209] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:If a woman can make a baby in 9 months, 4 women can make 2 babys in 4.5 months.
Proved by the power of maths!
Point made, but just because we don't have insight into the specific budget allocations doesn't mean that there is no value in conjecture. Most businesses operate in a similar fashion to some extent. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
335
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 16:44:00 -
[210] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:I assume you mean why did I say $10 as opposed to another amount? No, I mean what do you base the idea that you can spend $5 on A and $5 on B on?
Quote:It could very likely be that I am wrong and they view these projects, WIS and FIS, as mutually exclusive Considering how they have been treated so far, it seems increasingly likely that they are. Misunderstand me correctly: I agree with you GÇö it's theoretically possible for a company to do two things at once, and CCP have previously shown that they can have two things in focus at the same time (expansions such as Trinity and Apocrypha showed this) GÇö but the thing is that in recent years, they have just as apparently lost this ability (because they already have three things to juggle, perhaps?). From everything we've seen and been told, the resource allocation for EVE these days allows for one focus, perhaps with a few on-going tweaks and fixes at the side as long as those touch stuff that is already in the game.
Quote:Your "read some threads" idea of support has morphed into "read some dev blogs" Don't worry, it gets even better: go watch the fanfest presentations as well.
Quote:The reason why quote blocks are not optimal is that, if we both use them, the thread becomes a mess and readability suffers. How so? If I can use them to respond to specific points in your posts, you can use them to respond to specific points in mine. It is abundantly clear which posts belongs to whom, and as long as you don't break the tags or overly pyramid-quote, they read asGǪ you knowGǪ quotes.
GǪthen again, my custom CSS creates far better post separation than the mess CCP put together, so maybe I'm just having an easier time than most in this regard.  GÇöGÇöGÇö GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥ GÇö Karath Piki-á |
|

Raven Aldura
Interstellar Parcel Service
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 17:01:00 -
[211] - Quote
Then we shall agree that CCP has decided they cannot effectively develop both FIS and WIS, disagree over whether that is a good solution, and agree (most likely) that the new forums are not perfect but much better than the unholy travesty that was the old forums.
Truth be told, I have read all the dev blogs and watched the fanfest presentations, and they released what many consider one of the best FIS expansion in Apocrypha years after they announced work on WIS. Clearly they can do both at once from a budgetary perspective, but perhaps they cannot do them to a quality standard at the same time. This is a failure of management in my opinion.
Edit: removed word "operational" |

Too Much Effort
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 17:07:00 -
[212] - Quote
Tippia wrote:[quote=Raven Aldura]Blah blah blah
Blahblahblah
Don't you ever get sick of forum posturing? |

Bane Necran
72
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 17:11:00 -
[213] - Quote
Too Much Effort wrote:Tippia wrote:[quote=Raven Aldura]Blah blah blah Blahblahblah Don't you ever get sick of forum posturing?
Too little effort would be a better name for you.
If you're going to try and shut someone down here, you're just going to have to make walls of text like everyone else. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 19:12:00 -
[214] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:... Pakleds "we are not smart"....
If CCP history is any indication this means you will never ever see any additional WiS. And it will be the strangest unfinished content experience ever. Most unfinished Eve content can go unnoticed unless you made the mistake of making it your primary focus. Most players for example aren't constantly reminded that FW was never finished, that POSs have been broken since they were introduced or that WHs never got all the content promised there. But every time we log in we will now be reminded of that "crazy idea CCP started on where you would actually be able to walk around in the stations". That thing they worked on for 5 years that delivered the only single character trapped in a single room experience in MMO history". The thing that makes the NEX store and their attempt at microtransactions the biggest face plant in next generatition of MMO revenue models.
What CCP doesn't get is the EXPERIENCE of walking in stations is the fun! We don't need "game play" there to make us just want to interact socially as avatars in a space station enviroment. For example, for me to just be able to meet with my corp in a large private meeting room would be fantastic. Give me some spacestation eye candy I can share with my friends and you can stop and ponder "game play" to make it better, but putting me in my uncustomizable CQ prison cell every log in just says "fail".
So sadly what I saw in the winter expansion list was already more than they can deliver (and they even implied more would be added to the list) so they did what we begged them not to do and set us up for dissappointment.
So this winter we get the balancing we should have gotten a year ago, improvments to FW (which can't amount to much in the short time they have), some capital nerfs that should have been in a patch not an expansion, some likely randomization of 0.0 by mucking with local and making SOV even more confusing.
Net effect to myself or the members of my alliance is no decernable changes. I expect that will really be what most Eve players ultimately get from this expansion.
I think what this really says is don't expect anything new or cool in Eve, because CCP can't commit to finishing anything. The moment someone starts to whine they rethink their plans and vision and chase a new random direction. Anything more than tweaking some constants in a table that determines, damage, timers, resists, yields, speeds or ranges is beyond their capabilites to deliver in a complete and functional manner.
They have too much on thier plate and the ability to focus that you'd expect from a kitten in a ball or yarn store. They still don't graps that loud voices in these forums or from a hand full of people elected by special interest groups do not reflect the actual player base.
Steve Jobs stated "It's really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them". I thought CCP got that once but it is clear now they don't have the steel the stick to their guns and deliver anyting other than what some screamy focus group whines for.
Eve will eventually die by committee. Right now I expect folks in CCP are meeting to decide what kind of fire we want..
"When youGÇÖve been in marketing as long as I have, you'll know that before any new product can be developed it has to be properly researched. WeGÇÖve got to find out what people want from fire, how they relate to it, what sort of image it has for them."
And Eve freezes to death while they sort that out..
Issler |

Barbelo Valentinian
The Scope Gallente Federation
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 19:16:00 -
[215] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Of course you're supported dude. The "vision" is just fine, and apart from the computer-smoking CQ is a decent start.
It's mainly the fact that a) it wasn't optional as promised, and b) Hangar - a place where people were already immersed - disappeared, thus making a whole bunch of people feel "homeless" and therefore more ready to wake up out of their EVE trance and realize they weren't having as much fun with EVE as they used to.
Had CQ been rolled out as an optional adjunct, there wouldn't have been nearly so much hate for the WiS concept. Sure, some hate on it big time, but don't listen to them, they're just ******* Neanderthals, and they're a minority. I have been following this thing the whole year, and rest assured, most of the people who have unsubbed haven't unsubbed because they hate WiS on principle, they've unsubbed because of the broader issue of neglect of the core game and CCP seeming to lose its way.
Keep nurturing the core game, and you can add to it with all sorts of wonderful stuff like WiS, establishments, etc. I can assure you, most of us will lap it up - AT OUR LEISURE.
|

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 19:31:00 -
[216] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:What CCP doesn't get is the EXPERIENCE of walking in stations is the fun! We don't need "game play" there to make us just want to interact socially as avatars in a space station enviroment. For example, for me to just be able to meet with my corp in a large private meeting room would be fantastic. Give me some spacestation eye candy I can share with my friends and you can stop and ponder "game play" to make it better
To each their own, but personally I vehemently disagree with this. If there is nothing to do in stations, not too many people will hang around there for long. Unless they come up with something really clever to do there- which I gather they haven't yet- then it would just be a big hole to pour dev time into that nobody would ever use.
It isn't that CCP doesn't get that some people want like a Second Lifeish dressup minigame where there is nothing to do built into eve. That is exactly what CCP was so certain of. They went charging in that direction over the strong objections of the majority of their player base. It turned out to be a total disaster for the company. That's what the CEO just issued a very sincere appology for- driving the game in exactly the direction you are pushing for. |

The Offerer
Republic University Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 19:39:00 -
[217] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
This is the right way to do it. Thank you for making things clear.
From my point of view, it's better to have a polished feature that actually works on the majority of computers than having something like Minmatar HQ just thrown into the game.
I'd love to have multiplayer Incarna, but I'd like it to actually work and look good. It's a feature with great vision and potential that should not be ruined with another forced deployment. Building the trust of the customers again and providing much waited content to the really interesting side of the game (spaceships) are good goals for winter expansion. You have my full support. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 20:20:00 -
[218] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:What CCP doesn't get is the EXPERIENCE of walking in stations is the fun! We don't need "game play" there to make us just want to interact socially as avatars in a space station enviroment. For example, for me to just be able to meet with my corp in a large private meeting room would be fantastic. Give me some spacestation eye candy I can share with my friends and you can stop and ponder "game play" to make it better To each their own, but personally I vehemently disagree with this. If there is nothing to do in stations, not too many people will hang around there for long. Unless they come up with something really clever to do there- which I gather they haven't yet- then it would just be a big hole to pour dev time into that nobody would ever use. It isn't that CCP doesn't get that some people want like a Second Lifeish dressup minigame where there is nothing to do built into eve. That is exactly what CCP was so certain of. They went charging in that direction over the strong objections of the majority of their player base. It turned out to be a total disaster for the company. That's what the CEO just issued a very sincere appology for- driving the game in exactly the direction you are pushing for.
You don't understand immersion and how important that is to a lot of us. At least let me and others "out that door" and to a gallery of the ship docking bay and let me have an "office" in my corp HQ where you can wander in and look at our recruiting adverts and a meeting room for my members with screens that have our corp anouncements. That would be plenty to start. Since CCP can't even find a way to make low sec more interesting in 8 years how long to till they all agree what constitutes meaningful game play in WiS and get around to delivering that?
Also, I think you miss that based on CCP's performance on completion, they will NEVER come back to it so long as they think it needs some sort of "gameplay" because from day to day they can't decide what this is.
This isn't FW not being finished, its being trapped in a cell by yourself every time you log in or all the time you need to be in a station. It will serve as a constant reminder that CCP can't deliver anything complete and at least functioning in a minimal manner. It basically says you can't trust them to deliver their vision in any meaningful way.
Issler |

Alundil
The Unnamed. Novum Militis ExParte
11
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 20:39:00 -
[219] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
Back to WOW I guess |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:32:00 -
[220] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:You don't understand immersion and how important that is to a lot of us. At least let me and others "out that door" and to a gallery of the ship docking bay and let me have an "office" in my corp HQ where you can wander in and look at our recruiting adverts and a meeting room for my members with screens that have our corp anouncements. That would be plenty to start. Since CCP can't even find a way to make low sec more interesting in 8 years how long to till they all agree what constitutes meaningful game play in WiS and get around to delivering that?
Honestly, I don't even get what you'd do in the stations without any gameplay? Role play?
It's not that I would be mad if such a feature existed. It would probably even make the game better. But IMO if there is nothing to do there it would make the game better by such a narrow margin that it couldn't possibly be worth the development time. Now, again, my hope is that they do come up with something cool to do there and they do build it. But if they aren't really sure that they have a rock solid idea for something you can do in the stations that has wide support of the user base, I don't see how it could be at the top of their queue.
Issler Dainze wrote:its being trapped in a cell by yourself every time you log in or all the time you need to be in a station.
This part I do identify with. It feels weirdly like you're trapped in a claustrophobic space in the stations at the moment. I turned off the station environment for that reason. But IMO that isn't an argument for why CCP should plung ahead releasing a half backed WiS, it is an example of why that approach is a bad idea. |
|

Too Much Effort
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:40:00 -
[221] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:
Honestly, I don't even get what you'd do in the stations without any gameplay? Role play? .
Well, you're just an uninformed idiot aren't you.
Thanks for exposing that at the beginning of the post. You have no ******* clue what you're talking about. |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 21:43:00 -
[222] - Quote
Too Much Effort wrote:Well, you're just an uninformed idiot aren't you.
Thanks for exposing that at the beginning of the post. You have no ******* clue what you're talking about.
Why don't you enlighten me then. Issler is proposing that they release walking in stations prior to having any game play features there. Just a hallway people can stand in. What is it you anticipate doing in that hallway? |

Afale II
Space Pony Farm
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 22:49:00 -
[223] - Quote
If you think that this backpeddeling is good for EVE then you're wrong. This Game hasn't Evolve in years. CCP excuse was, that they where working on WIS, which was ok for me and many others.
What we got was not Walking in Station but Walking in a single Room. Thats why so many people where upset, the constant lieing together with the Itemshop and the poor performence.
CCP told everyone this summer that the multiplayer part for Incarna will be deliverd with the Winterexpansion, and now 2 months before the Deadline they dump it?
They just pissed off and lied to the other part of the playerbase that belived CCP could create this WIS Stuff they showed and promised us years ago.
And no i don't think that Weapons and Ship re-balancing together with room retexuring is a "Expansion" at all. Thats nothing a patch can't fix every other day of the year.
You will never get new customers if you just maintain your game instead of expanding it. -Nostalgia is not as good as it used to be- |

Juil
Phoenix Industries Pty. Ltd.
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 00:06:00 -
[224] - Quote
Afale II wrote:If you think that this backpeddeling is good for EVE then you're wrong. This Game hasn't Evolve in years. CCP excuse was, that they where working on WIS, which was ok for me and many others.
What we got was not Walking in Station but Walking in a single Room. Thats why so many people where upset, the constant lieing together with the Itemshop and the poor performence.
CCP told everyone this summer that the multiplayer part for Incarna will be deliverd with the Winterexpansion, and now 2 months before the Deadline they dump it?
They just pissed off and lied to the other part of the playerbase that belived CCP could create this WIS Stuff they showed and promised us years ago.
And no i don't think that Weapons and Ship re-balancing together with room retexuring is a "Expansion" at all. Thats nothing a patch can't fix every other day of the year.
You will never get new customers if you just maintain your game instead of expanding it.
Some one who actually read the thread and the complaints by the people in it.. and yeah it is, the fact that CCP has 'lied' again. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 00:27:00 -
[225] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:... Pakleds "we are not smart".... If CCP history is any indication this means you will never ever see any additional WiS. And it will be the strangest unfinished content experience ever. Most unfinished Eve content can go unnoticed unless you made the mistake of making it your primary focus. Most players for example aren't constantly reminded that FW was never finished, that POSs have been broken since they were introduced or that WHs never got all the content promised there. But every time we log in we will now be reminded of that "crazy idea CCP started on where you would actually be able to walk around in the stations". That thing they worked on for 5 years that delivered the only single character trapped in a single room experience in MMO history". The thing that makes the NEX store and their attempt at microtransactions the biggest face plant in next generatition of MMO revenue models. What CCP doesn't get is the EXPERIENCE of walking in stations is the fun! We don't need "game play" there to make us just want to interact socially as avatars in a space station enviroment. For example, for me to just be able to meet with my corp in a large private meeting room would be fantastic. Give me some spacestation eye candy I can share with my friends and you can stop and ponder "game play" to make it better, but putting me in my uncustomizable CQ prison cell every log in just says "fail". So sadly what I saw in the winter expansion list was already more than they can deliver (and they even implied more would be added to the list) so they did what we begged them not to do and set us up for dissappointment. So this winter we get the balancing we should have gotten a year ago, improvments to FW (which can't amount to much in the short time they have), some capital nerfs that should have been in a patch not an expansion, some likely randomization of 0.0 by mucking with local and making SOV even more confusing. Net effect to myself or the members of my alliance is no decernable changes. I expect that will really be what most Eve players ultimately get from this expansion. I think what this really says is don't expect anything new or cool in Eve, because CCP can't commit to finishing anything. The moment someone starts to whine they rethink their plans and vision and chase a new random direction. Anything more than tweaking some constants in a table that determines, damage, timers, resists, yields, speeds or ranges is beyond their capabilites to deliver in a complete and functional manner. They have too much on thier plate and the ability to focus that you'd expect from a kitten in a ball or yarn store. They still don't graps that loud voices in these forums or from a hand full of people elected by special interest groups do not reflect the actual player base. Steve Jobs stated "It's really hard to design products by focus groups. A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them". I thought CCP got that once but it is clear now they don't have the steel the stick to their guns and deliver anyting other than what some screamy focus group whines for. Eve will eventually die by committee. Right now I expect folks in CCP are meeting to decide what kind of fire we want.. " When youGÇÖve been in marketing as long as I have, you'll know that before any new product can be developed it has to be properly researched. WeGÇÖve got to find out what people want from fire, how they relate to it, what sort of image it has for them." And Eve freezes to death while they sort that out.. Issler
Yes, I agree 110%. It is acutally what I said all the time. I get this feeling: There are the luddites who hate WiS because they hate changes. Because the few changes they will make to FiS now are cosmetic patching. Nothing to cheer about. Then there are some arse-kissers cannot do better than to think beyond what their leaders say.
There are no "space barbies" and "second lifers" enjoying EVE one way or the other. Such people quit before finishing tuts.
The pro-WiS people I know don't even want Establishments this winter. They would like them as some great feature.
What they want is: GET OUT OF THE F-ING HAMSTER CAGE AND BE ABLE TO MEET! Like, invite each other to those awesome TM CQs. *coughs*
The whole thing has taught me a few lessons though: The CSM did a good job representing us against the 'gold ammo" issue. Something we all were united in as players. Then they went to represent a loud minority. (theirs) So: I would never vote for anyone involved with a large 0-Sec Alliance. They just don't grasp there is more to the game than pew-pew. This is what we get as an "expansion" excuse this year.
CCP manipulating us into thinking they follow "player-wishes". Hell, most players don't even read this forum. |

Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 02:25:00 -
[226] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. Why do you want a feature in a game i.e. WiS that has absolutely no information about it? At this stage all we know about WiS is that you can walk in stations and something about smuggling. That is it. You can't actually practically do ANYTHING in WiS. That is what I suspect, based upon CCP Solomon saying "the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun.". They, like you focused on the awesomeness of the feature, NOT what the feature enables people to do. They have got WiS totally backwards, figure out what WiS will bring to the game, then build WiS around that gameplay. Not put in feature and hope you think of something to do with it later. |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 04:34:00 -
[227] - Quote
Wolfcan wrote:Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. Why do you want a feature in a game i.e. WiS that has absolutely no information about it? At this stage all we know about WiS is that you can walk in stations and something about smuggling. That is it. You can't actually practically do ANYTHING in WiS. That is what I suspect, based upon CCP Solomon saying "the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun.". They, like you focused on the awesomeness of the feature, NOT what the feature enables people to do. They have got WiS totally backwards, figure out what WiS will bring to the game, then build WiS around that gameplay. Not put in feature and hope you think of something to do with it later.
Someone stated a few post before this. Alot of WiS people including myself, didn't have the ergent need for all the bells and whistles of Establishments. Simply being able to meet your Corpmates in "person" would have been enough to chew on for a few months while they figured the rest out.
We've been walking and pacing in the same CQ for how long now?
And ontop of that, Will we at the VERY LEAST get the rest of the CQ's.. If they decide to not even release those, then I don't know what else to think of CCP and their business plan for the future of EVE.
I'm just glad I wasn't one of those people who sub'd for a year straight, the agonying of knowing I'd still be paying these folks even months after I decided to leave would be rather.. ANGORZING!! LoL
But I do hope FiS actually happens for us in this Winter Expansion, cause I'm telling you.. If they fail to bring anything of real content.. These FiS people are going to drop their I <3 Hellmar banners for some pitchforks and fire..
GARUNTEE IT..! |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
457
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 04:42:00 -
[228] - Quote
Listen, maybe you people haven't noticed, but EVE is bleeding out right now.
Either CCP get :spaceships: working right now or there won't be an EVE for there to be further WiS expansions.
The Incarna engine simply isn't ready for all the cool stuff that would make a WiS focus worthwhile. It sucks, it's shocking that it's true, but there it is. No matter what, you're not going to get multiplayer WiS this winter, and you were never going to get it either.
So It's a real shame that you're not going to get 2 WiS expansions in a row after FiS has been neglected for 2 years, but you'll just have to deal with it. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 04:58:00 -
[229] - Quote
Apollo-Moor wrote:Alot of WiS people including myself, didn't have the ergent need for all the bells and whistles of Establishments. Simply being able to meet your Corpmates in "person" would have been enough to chew on for a few months while they figured the rest out.
I hear you dude, but from what I'm hearing from CCP, if they gave you what they've got, It would absolutely destroy your hopes of WiS. i.e. from all the trouble with overheating graphics cards, I would suspect WiS is impossible to implement atm (even if they wanted to). When you implement a totally broken feature to a game you can effectively poison that feature for the future, no amount of tweaking and iteration of that feature will make it better in the eyes of the community. For your benefit and all the WiS hopefuls, it would be better for you guys that CCP get WiS working right before imposing a painfullly badly broken feature into the game.
I understand where your coming from, I died a little when Blizzard announced they were delaying Diablo III |

Swooshie
USA Canada Private Corp
29
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 05:33:00 -
[230] - Quote
A view :
Stagnation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------> Innovation
Too little <-----------------------------------Balance-----------------------------------> Too much
EXTREME --------------------------------------------------------------------------------> EXTREME
All the way to the left; it dies slowly, we are bored, corporate motivation goes in the toilet.
All the way to the right: current situation; the hype factor takes over actual functionality.
EVERY TIME you set on an EXTREME, the dung hits the spinning blades.
Hope we didn't completely switch to the left now...... "It is when I think about meaning that I lose what I meant to say." -á-á-á -Swooshie |
|

Flamespar
Woof Club
51
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 12:40:00 -
[231] - Quote
Swooshie wrote:Hope we didn't completely switch to the left now......
Who the **** knows what CCP will do now. There are so many lies and broken promises that I just don't know what to believe.
I'm kinda tempted to leave EVE and come back in 12 months and see if anything has changed. Rather than this 'wait and see' bullshit. I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Ammzi
Imperial Guardians Blazing Angels Alliance
38
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 13:11:00 -
[232] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote: That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
I have never been more happy. Bye! |

DeadDuck
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 16:28:00 -
[233] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
Don't let the door hit on your way out  |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
23
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 16:41:00 -
[234] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:I'm kinda tempted to leave EVE and come back in 12 months and see if anything has changed. Rather than this 'wait and see' bullshit.
I believe they gave us the "Ol' Bait-n-Switch", but when they opened their other hand.. There was still nothing in it.. LmAo.. |

betoli
Between the lines
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:12:00 -
[235] - Quote
Afale II wrote:If you think that this backpeddeling is good for EVE then you're wrong. This Game hasn't Evolve in years. CCP excuse was, that they where working on WIS, which was ok for me and many others.
What we got was not Walking in Station but Walking in a single Room. Thats why so many people where upset, the constant lieing together with the Itemshop and the poor performence.
CCP told everyone this summer that the multiplayer part for Incarna will be deliverd with the Winterexpansion, and now 2 months before the Deadline they dump it?
Yep, lets be real about this. If CCP were 2 months away from release then they would release it.
If it only worked on high end systems, they would release it.
If it had no game play elements, but allowed you to, er, mingle, they would release it.
The fact that they are not releasing it, really can only be because a) they don't know how to integrae a variable number of CQ's into a single VR environment, b) are unclear of the mechanics (e.g. what happens if someone hits the undock button whilst in the bar). or c) they are behind with the asset design and can't make the winter release anyway.
In the meantime they are exploiting the player rage to justify failure to deliver anything, as an emergency refocussing on FiS - most of which is minor, takes only a small resource and should have been done ages ago in parallel with WiS. I mean hybrid rebalance.
a) decide how to fix it. b) change 2-3 numbers in the database.
not exactly a huge manpower effort, is it? |

betoli
Between the lines
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 20:28:00 -
[236] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Raven Aldura wrote:If I have $10 and I want some widget A and some widget B, I can buy $5 of each. Only if they're sold in $1 or $5 packets. Unfortunately, there is a $10 minimum buy-in in this caseGǪ
To be honest, I think this is the root of the problem - allocation of resouerces. In a game like eve, there should be multiple teams some of which are permanently focussed, say one on game balancing/tweaking, one on bug fixing, one on content creation where the game infrastructure is already in place, one on serious overhaul of existing game elements that are getting rusty, and 1-2 on genuinely new stuff. Remaining teams should be in support of those functions (graphics/QA etc). CCP seem to randomly reallocate and redeploy teams to try to get large feature X out the door before then reallocating them to feature X+1.
|

Athiven SkyWolf
Ancient Terran Allience
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 21:24:00 -
[237] - Quote
Grateler wrote:Mystic5hadow wrote:flakeys wrote:Mystic5hadow wrote: I just found that the fact they said Establishments were coming this expansion, then them not appearing on that list, was kind of odd. You'd think something that was promised is coming would already be on that list.
You do know how long us oldtimers waited on WIS while it was promised to come soontm?I'd think next summer earliest to expect any big new content to the WIS so keep your hopes low is my advice , if you can't enjoy eve without the WIS then you've joined the wrong game imho.IT's there as a sideshow for the main game. I've only been waiting since 2008, it's not that I can't enjoy EVE without it, it's the fact that CCP always promises stuff then doesn't deliver. Now it was just the ultimate tease to me, as Incarna is something I'm really excited for, they kept saying that Establishments are coming this Winter, we already have CQ teasing us, and now it seems CCP has dropped Establishment from this Winter. Which, for all I know, may not be the case as we all know CCP isn't very good at being clear about everything, but if that is the case then I am severely disappointed. It's the solitary thing I have been waiting for, the rest has just been bonuses to me, and now that it seemed it was finally arriving.. CCP decides to focus on the stuff those-with-the-loudest-mouths (or clickiest-keys? I dunno, lol) complained about. I will always love EVE, regardless if Establishments come this Winter or not. Though I may be disappointed if they aren't coming any time soon, I will still play and enjoy EVE... Unless they pull this again, then I dunno, I'd probably be really pissed by then. The majority of complaints recently have been because people dont want Incarna and want CCP to concentrate on spaceships. The reality is that all this work on Incarna was going to result in very little gameplay, all Ive heard is smuggling and gambling, both of which seem to be minigames at best. As confirmed above it wont be appearing anytime soon which is good news as I just dont see what it would have added and when the door opened and there was little to do there would have been further justified uproar.
Nobody i know is playing Eve. I however know at least 9 people who tried it and left after a month because they didn't like to identify with a ship.
When you say most people wants Devs to concentrate on spaceships this is true for those actually playing maybe. But the voices that were heard against Incarna were many and maybe a majority but no mystery there as most of those who would wish real avatars are not playing Eve because they don't like it as it is. I myself started playing in 2004 and left after a year to come back when Incarna was released in june. And i am not playing more than one hour before switching to another MMO that i can have a body and meet people face to face.
This is what bullies and tyrants do. Force the place around them to be the way they want then when everybody else who doesn't like it left, they can say "look 100% of people think like us".
I could say "Who cares for the 0,05 % of the population in 0,0 ?". If you look at the galaxy in game map, population in null-sec seem about that high and often lower. Why bother about it and capital ships when most fly in empire space. When the CSM asked to vote on the long list of features they were thinking most urgent for the devs to deal with i could not find one i really cared and most i was not even aware of them. As a matter of fact i looked if there was a feature about incarna and i don't think there was one or i missed it. |

Numance
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 21:33:00 -
[238] - Quote
and does this refocusing to FiS will push back DUST514 from summer 2012 release ? |

Hikaru Kuroda
Shimai of New Eden N E X O
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 21:49:00 -
[239] - Quote
Athiven SkyWolf wrote:This is what bullies and tyrants do. Force the place around them to be the way they want then when everybody else who doesn't like it left, they can say "look 100% of people think like us".
This = CSM = 0.0 alliance's interests
How could be EVE otherwise if they even choose what ships you have to fly? They are actually making the game they want. No WiS. No carebearing. Just nonsense pew-pew 24/7. |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
24
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 22:00:00 -
[240] - Quote
Numance wrote:and does this refocusing to FiS will push back DUST514 from summer 2012 release ?
Yes, yes it will.. Indefinately |
|

Swooshie
USA Canada Private Corp
30
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 22:26:00 -
[241] - Quote
Flamespar wrote:Who the **** knows what CCP will do now. There are so many lies and broken promises that I just don't know what to believe.
I'm kinda tempted to leave EVE and come back in 12 months and see if anything has changed. Rather than this 'wait and see' bullshit.
This is almost exactly what I did. I just came back to EVE in august after an 8 months long hiatus. I had no beef with CCP or any intent when I left for a while, I only was a little bored but looking forward to Incarna or rather, what the devblogs said Incarna would be. I came back on a reactivation special offer to see how things were.
Needless to say, I was disappointed of what I saw but I was willing to wait for the rest; this could take a while.
I love EVE and I'm not going anywhere this time because I play with a friend and I'm having fun. However, I thought for a long time that, as a sand box with such a deep lore, there ought to be a way to get more into the "pilot" aspect of EVE, that social interaction, on an individual level, would bring a dimension to this game like there never has been before in the game industry.
Of course, in order to make just that Incarna had to be incredible; it had to have the depth needed to reflect what FiS is and this was/is a tall order.
I agree that making sure EVE's main element, spaceships, is fun and functional is primordial. Sadly however, I think no games in this emergent cut-throat industry can hope to survive in a restricted niche market; at least not without giving up something on some fronts such as quality, diversity or innovation.
A completed and functional concept such as Incarna might very well still be necessary for EVE's survival in the long run. I guess we'll see.
"It is when I think about meaning that I lose what I meant to say." -á-á-á -Swooshie |

Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.08 23:20:00 -
[242] - Quote
Swooshie wrote:A completed and functional concept such as Incarna might very well still be necessary for EVE's survival in the long run. I guess we'll see. I couldn't agree with you more Swooshie. But the problem that exists now is the total focus on WiS, Dust514 and WoD. Basically no development on Eve for 18 months plus. This decision is killing the income stream to develop WiS features. If you ignore your current player base in order to create a "bigger, better" player base you will destroy your current game. This method has never worked in any game. CCP has bitten off more than they can chew. They need total refocusing, fix Eve then get onto WiS, Dust514 and WoD. |

Oberine Noriepa
112
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 01:51:00 -
[243] - Quote
Numance wrote:and does this refocusing to FiS will push back DUST514 from summer 2012 release ? A completely different team (CCP Shanghai) is working on Dust 514. |

Shepard Book
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 03:23:00 -
[244] - Quote
Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game.
You may want to look up a company called Blizzard. |

Xavier Zedicus
Predator's Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 03:32:00 -
[245] - Quote
FiS, also abbreviates to Fighting in station.... so really not a good term to use. Nerf Rock, Paper is fine. - Scissors-á
|

Wolfcan
EVE University Ivy League
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 04:06:00 -
[246] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game. You may want to look up a company called Blizzard. Um, yeah. Blizzard has millions of subscribers. It has the money and resources to do what ever it wants. CCP doesn't. They have a limited amount of money for development. Further, the continued decline of subscribers in EVE indicate something is seriously wrong with the game..... |

Flamespar
Woof Club
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 05:55:00 -
[247] - Quote
Xavier Zedicus wrote:FiS, also abbreviates to Fighting in station.... so really not a good term to use.
It also equals Fashion in Stations.  I can post on a forum, therefore I represent everyone. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
474
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 06:02:00 -
[248] - Quote
Shepard Book wrote:Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game. You may want to look up a company called Blizzard.
You may want to look up the trend in the numbr of people logging in to EVE. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Sebastian N Cain
Aliastra Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 13:35:00 -
[249] - Quote
Jada Maroo wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. You know what makes not-fun things fun? Guns. There you go. Just saved CCP hundreds of thousands in consultants and marketing research.
And boobs, you forgot boobs. It-¦s proven that it-¦s the best way to make not-fun things fun ever.Tons of ****** movies were saved by boobs.
Also who wouldn-¦t like to see mitten put his leather thong on and become Lady Scarlets biitch? "You either need less science fiction or more medication."
"Or less medication and more ammo!" |

Athiven SkyWolf
Ancient Terran Allience
2
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 21:45:00 -
[250] - Quote
Wolfcan wrote:Shepard Book wrote:Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game. You may want to look up a company called Blizzard. Um, yeah. Blizzard has millions of subscribers. It has the money and resources to do what ever it wants. CCP doesn't. They have a limited amount of money for development. Further, the continued decline of subscribers in EVE indicate something is seriously wrong with the game.....
Yes and one of the way to find money other than subscriptions is NEX items that people walking in station would get. Or do you think developpers are all volunteering for the joy to supply you new toys ? Guess what, they need to be paid. Or would you prefer commercial advertising ? Imagine commercial about Coke or other companies interrupting to show a full screen on" minute ad every 10 minute. Or items that you could buy only with real money, like a tech 5 DeathStar ? Even if you don't care for Incarna, consider that and think that after all it is not that bad.
Also, i am a paying subscriber too and i am tired to see my money go to things i don't care for. I don't care if big battles (well if you consider 200 or 300 big, but heh can't do more with nullsec pop) are less laggy as said to be in next winter. As said before nullsec only concerns a handful of people. I don't care if they get a new tech 4 or tech 5 ship. I am waiting for Incarna now for 6 years and have seen it repeatedly pushed back to let developpers cater to the nullsec minority. All this time i didn't complain. Now that there is ONE expansion focused on finally releasing walking in station Incarna haters again tries to push it back ?
Most Incarna haters are playing for 4 or 5+ years. I bet most are just farming pirates or asteroids to get a few millions to buy plex. Most subscription money is not coming from them. Not only are the nullsec population small but they are also then not a big source of income. |
|

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 21:53:00 -
[251] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled.
i bet the subs are still running |

MissingNo1
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.09 22:02:00 -
[252] - Quote
iNfeck7ed wrote:CCP actually learned its lesson and is not going to rush through crappy establishment expansions. Meanwhile, it has given us a template of fixes it will be working on for winter such as hybrid rebalancing, FW changes, sov mech changes, assault frig bonus fix, etc, as described in the recent devs. These are way more important so just sit tight. If you feel the need to walk your avatar, go play WoW and come back when WIS is fully launched. I'll light a cyno for you when it's here.
You do realise that WiS is a 6-8 year old concept, right?
It was first displayed at a fan fest years ago (which, I may add, has been ninja'd from CCP's YouTube page). |

betoli
Between the lines
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:24:00 -
[253] - Quote
MissingNo1 wrote:iNfeck7ed wrote:CCP actually learned its lesson and is not going to rush through crappy establishment expansions. Meanwhile, it has given us a template of fixes it will be working on for winter such as hybrid rebalancing, FW changes, sov mech changes, assault frig bonus fix, etc, as described in the recent devs. These are way more important so just sit tight. If you feel the need to walk your avatar, go play WoW and come back when WIS is fully launched. I'll light a cyno for you when it's here. You do realise that WiS is a 6-8 year old concept, right? It was first displayed at a fan fest years ago (which, I may add, has been ninja'd from CCP's YouTube page).
Seems to have gone backward since 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
|

J'Poll
IMPERIAL LEGI0N
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 12:37:00 -
[254] - Quote
So in the end we are still playing EVE Online: Incursions only with the crappy CQ atm.
I do enjoy FiS, but did also see a lot of potential in the WiS part. But I do like that CCP now actually first going to plan and improve stuff before releasing it to the masses. Now let's hope this won't take another 2 or 3 years though as all that booze I stored for my own bar in 4-4 won't last that long 
J'Poll Director / Recruiter - Borealis Mining Concern Recruiter - Imperial Legi0n
As a finishing touch, God created the Dutch |

Apollo-Moor
xHELLonEARTHx Rookie Empire
28
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 13:19:00 -
[255] - Quote
betoli wrote:MissingNo1 wrote:iNfeck7ed wrote:CCP actually learned its lesson and is not going to rush through crappy establishment expansions. Meanwhile, it has given us a template of fixes it will be working on for winter such as hybrid rebalancing, FW changes, sov mech changes, assault frig bonus fix, etc, as described in the recent devs. These are way more important so just sit tight. If you feel the need to walk your avatar, go play WoW and come back when WIS is fully launched. I'll light a cyno for you when it's here. You do realise that WiS is a 6-8 year old concept, right? It was first displayed at a fan fest years ago (which, I may add, has been ninja'd from CCP's YouTube page). Seems to have gone backward since 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
Funny looks like those guys are sittiing in some sort of War Room at the end possibly looking at PI installations... Hmm I wonder how not having that will effect DUST514.. Hmm
CCP You guys are ****** on that project without WiS believe me. I play console FPS and when you release that and people realize that they sort of need EVE players. It will tank, cause EVE players won't be WiS and won't give a **** about DUST514 players holding their pencils waiting for orders. |

Naran Eto
Kut-n-Run
18
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 14:32:00 -
[256] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Translation: We at CCP don't like confrontation so to quiet down all members of the loud noisy and aggressively whiny vocal minority we have put it on the back burner and are working on ships again. |

Oberine Noriepa
123
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 15:00:00 -
[257] - Quote
Apollo-Moor wrote:betoli wrote:MissingNo1 wrote:iNfeck7ed wrote:CCP actually learned its lesson and is not going to rush through crappy establishment expansions. Meanwhile, it has given us a template of fixes it will be working on for winter such as hybrid rebalancing, FW changes, sov mech changes, assault frig bonus fix, etc, as described in the recent devs. These are way more important so just sit tight. If you feel the need to walk your avatar, go play WoW and come back when WIS is fully launched. I'll light a cyno for you when it's here. You do realise that WiS is a 6-8 year old concept, right? It was first displayed at a fan fest years ago (which, I may add, has been ninja'd from CCP's YouTube page). Seems to have gone backward since 2008: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E Funny looks like those guys are sittiing in some sort of War Room at the end possibly looking at PI installations... Hmm I wonder how not having that will effect DUST514.. Hmm CCP You guys are ****** on that project without WiS believe me. I play console FPS and when you release that and people realize that they sort of need EVE players. It will tank, cause EVE players won't be WiS and won't give a **** about DUST514 players holding their pencils waiting for orders. That's actually a minigame called Conquest. It has nothing to do with Dust 514. A Dust view is going to be available through Planetary Interaction. It was available in the last Singularity mirror. |

WisdomLikeSilence
The Cursed Navy Important Internet Spaceship League
53
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 15:15:00 -
[258] - Quote
Raven Aldura wrote:[quote=CCP Solomon]CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this.
QFT
Seriously, Next time you bring up the subject of Incarna it had better be "here is the FINISHED INCARNA project"
By the way, the subscriber drop had little or nothing to do with Incarna expansions underwhelmingness and a lot to do with the Anomaly Nerf - which has made it impractical for thousands of players to maintain dual or triple accounts AS PREDICTED. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
39
|
Posted - 2011.10.13 16:00:00 -
[259] - Quote
WisdomLikeSilence wrote:Raven Aldura wrote:[quote=CCP Solomon]CCP please don't bring incarna up again until you mean it. This tease has gone on long enough. Screw this. QFT Seriously, Next time you bring up the subject of Incarna it had better be "here is the FINISHED INCARNA project" By the way, the subscriber drop had little or nothing to do with Incarna expansions underwhelmingness and a lot to do with the Anomaly Nerf - which has made it impractical for thousands of players to maintain dual or triple accounts AS PREDICTED.
Ahhh, no.
If someone in null is too stupid to figure out how to make good money post nerf, all they need do is go back to having a money making alt in Empire. That's how it worked for years and nothing has occured to make that more difficult... in fact it would be easier now than ever, considering the changes to agent quality.
Need I point out that this would give even more incentive to have multiple accounts... To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Important Internet Spaceship League
12
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:30:00 -
[260] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Shepard Book wrote:Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game. You may want to look up a company called Blizzard. You may want to look up the trend in the numbr of people logging in to EVE.
People are logging back into Eve, despite all the games that have been coming out, and that's saying something. I've been flying with a few people in my corp that I haven't seen in over a year. The direction change and what is coming out has been bringing people back to Eve. That is good. However, I am with many in this thread when I say that I hope Incarna isn't abandoned. The potential for Incarna being awesome is there. What we got was severely lacking.
Ranger 1 wrote:Ahhh, no.
If someone in null is too stupid to figure out how to make good money post nerf, all they need do is go back to having a money making alt in Empire. That's how it worked for years and nothing has occured to make that more difficult... in fact it would be easier now than ever, considering the changes to agent quality.
Need I point out that this would give even more incentive to have multiple accounts...
Honestly, Incursions are a bigger money maker than anoms ever were and significantly more fun than any of the other income sources in Eve right now. |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
198
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 19:37:00 -
[261] - Quote
Bagehi wrote:Malcanis wrote:Shepard Book wrote:Wolfcan wrote:. This method has never worked in any game. You may want to look up a company called Blizzard. You may want to look up the trend in the numbr of people logging in to EVE. People are logging back into Eve, despite all the games that have been coming out, and that's saying something. I've been flying with a few people in my corp that I haven't seen in over a year. The direction change and what is coming out has been bringing people back to Eve. That is good. However, I am with many in this thread when I say that I hope Incarna isn't abandoned. The potential for Incarna being awesome is there. What we got was severely lacking. Ranger 1 wrote:Ahhh, no.
If someone in null is too stupid to figure out how to make good money post nerf, all they need do is go back to having a money making alt in Empire. That's how it worked for years and nothing has occured to make that more difficult... in fact it would be easier now than ever, considering the changes to agent quality.
Need I point out that this would give even more incentive to have multiple accounts... Honestly, Incursions are a bigger money maker than anoms ever were and significantly more fun than any of the other income sources in Eve right now.
Fair point, which reinforces the point I was making. The Anom nerf had little or nothing to do with the loss of subscriptions in EVE. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
258
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:43:00 -
[262] - Quote
Alua Oresson wrote:The squeeky wheel gets the grease. However, I think that this refocus of their time is well spent. They are still working on WIS. And I do believe they will have something out in about a year. However, I am excited that the actual core gameplay is being addressed. These are items that have plagued the game for years. I'm all for fixing the game before you add more stuff to it.
No, they are not working in any way on WiS so to the OP there are no establishments coming in any current CCP plan. Himar said once the other COs are delivered Incarna has been delivered.
Himlar said they will focus on FiS only going forward as the Eve players indicated that is all they want and another developer confirmed that WiS work is "on ice" indefinitely. I have a very active thread going about that very topic.
Y'all need to be reading more!
Issler |

Selinate
78
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:45:00 -
[263] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
THANK YOU.
Even if I do really want the establishments, I really want this game to perform better with avatars... |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
258
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 21:50:00 -
[264] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Too Much Effort wrote:Well, you're just an uninformed idiot aren't you.
Thanks for exposing that at the beginning of the post. You have no ******* clue what you're talking about. Why don't you enlighten me then. Issler is proposing that they release walking in stations prior to having any game play features there. Just a hallway people can stand in. What is it you anticipate doing in that hallway?
I proposed more than a "hallway". An assortment of rooms of different themes for example. And a lot of players supported that suggestion. CCP is lying if they say they don't know how to make it compelling, there are hundreds of suggestions from players about how they could, some simple, some complex.
If you can't find some value in having a real area to occupy with other pilots as avatars in a station, then don't through the door but stop saying lots of folks wouldn't find value in what that offered and that even something simple in that direction would expand the appeal of Eve to the folks that won't play because they can't leave their ship.
Issler |

Cpt Arareb
Ideal Machine THE R0NIN
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 22:54:00 -
[265] - Quote
Khira Kitamatsu wrote:CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
That is what I needed to hear. Accounts cancelled. buuuu byyy 
|

Tristan North
The Scope
33
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:10:00 -
[266] - Quote
Cpt Arareb wrote:buuuu byyy  You're fuckin ugly.
|

Cipher Jones
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:33:00 -
[267] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
Here's the problem. You've been talking about walking in stations for a long time. I have been hearing about it for close to 3 years. Now no matter what you do you are ****** for subs. You cant possibly keep the FiS and WiS crowds happy if neither is working as intended. You guys were just starting to get your PCU up again.
TL;DR
PROTIP: Don't tell your kids you're going to Disney till you have the tickets in your hand.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Cipher Jones
104
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 23:39:00 -
[268] - Quote
Seleene wrote:In order for Incarna to have any chance whatsoever, there needs to be solid, interesting game play. That doesn't exist, nor has the CSM seen anything on the horizon that looks to change that. From 'that other forum': Quote:Since there never appeared to be a solid idea about what 'establishments' would bring to EVE, CCP basically postponed a feature that didn't exist in the first place.
Incarna has the potential to be amazing but in terms of importance, for example when allocating resources, it pales, or should pale, in comparison to spaceships. Certainly now, and probably for a long time to come as well. In the end, you can take Incarna out of EVE, but you can't take spaceships out of EVE. Yep.
Soundwave got up at fanfest and described it quite precisely. There's even a youtube video of it for our players who were educated prior to no child left behind.
Council of Stellar Misrepresentation.
See what happens when fat neckbeards try to ride little ponies? The ponies die. |

Komen
Capital Enrichment Services
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 00:50:00 -
[269] - Quote
Tristan North wrote:Mystic5hadow wrote:"We won't have Establishments ready by December, so lets do something easier and say we're listening to people. Win-win." This.
"We have no idea what establishments are supposed to be about, other than a way to socialize with other people's avatars. So instead we're going to go back to the spaceships bit (which drew MOST of this playerbase) and try to improve or fix things that have needed love for years, in a desperate bid to NOT lose so many subscribers that we no longer have a source of income. Crazily enough, we might even get back some players by doing this.
Also Incarna did not draw in the expected new subscribers, because it's an unfinished feature and should've been left in the oven another couple years." (what CCP has not actually said, but may be inferred) |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
130
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 01:39:00 -
[270] - Quote
Oh, it is nice that someone got back this old thread from the drawer. It kind of proves that there are more than "10 peoples and their alts" caring about WiS. Thank you! |
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
674
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 01:43:00 -
[271] - Quote
Aidan Brooder wrote:Oh, it is nice that someone got back this old thread from the drawer. It kind of proves that there are more than "10 peoples and their alts" caring about WiS. Thank you! You have a funny definition of the word 'proof'.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
130
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 01:45:00 -
[272] - Quote
No, I just counted the number of people that posted pro-WiS in this thread. Perhaps you have a funny concept of math? |

Bomberlocks
CTRL-Q
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.05 01:49:00 -
[273] - Quote
no. |

Ranka Mei
TANoshii Incorporated New Eden Research.
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:57:00 -
[274] - Quote
CCP Solomon wrote:Sadly, the Establishments feature will not be coming in the winter expansion. We hear you guys loud and clear and realize that there is still strong support for a multiplayer, avatar based experience in EVE (we also hear those that donGÇÖt want it). However, we think youGÇÖll agree that it has to be a compelling experience and there was a feeling amongst our people that the direction we were taking with the Establishments feature wasGǪ well, not that fun. Additionally, we wanted to ensure that our rendering technology was finely tuned to a point that would ensure all of your characters continued to look great while performing well.
ItGÇÖs humbling to see the support in this thread for a multiplayer Incarna experience and we are still committed to providing it, as and when itGÇÖs ready. We want to take the time to do it right and ensure you guys get something that is both fun and involving. There are no promises about when this will happen, just rest assured that while you are enjoying your space based updates this winter, there will continue to be movement on this.
I'm sad establishments won't be in the Winter expansion, as I truly looked forward to everything Incarna had to offer. I am, at the same time, delighted to hear you commit to doing something with Incarna, and that the door will eventually open -- even if you can't tell yet when that's going to be.
Not that it matters, but, for the record, I am a WiS lover; and I am not alone, I can assure you that!
-- "All your monies AUR belong to us!" -- CCP |

Grukni
Shimai of New Eden N E X O
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:34:00 -
[275] - Quote
Players already gave lots of ideas about how to make Incarna fun. It was mainly about running covert ops and pirating missions. Gambling (mini-games) and watching exotic dancers while drinking quafe was a nice plus to have, but not worth the effort for the added value.
An example: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1529922
Of course CCP knows it, but can't deliver on time and I understand, because it's a huge task, impossible to deliver in a 6 months timeframe. |

Candy n'Backrubs
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 05:12:00 -
[276] - Quote
Mersault wrote:Establishments, like pies, take a good deal of preperation. They need time to rest before they are good to go.
You just blew my mind |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 05:20:00 -
[277] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I proposed more than a "hallway". An assortment of rooms of different themes for example. And a lot of players supported that suggestion. CCP is lying if they say they don't know how to make it compelling, there are hundreds of suggestions from players about how they could, some simple, some complex.
If you can't find some value in having a real area to occupy with other pilots as avatars in a station, then don't through the door but stop saying lots of folks wouldn't find value in what that offered and that even something simple in that direction would expand the appeal of Eve to the folks that won't play because they can't leave their ship.
Issler
Can you give me an example of something simple, but fun, CCP could do with WiS? So far the suggestions I've heard have either seemed very involved (aka development time hogs) or pointless. Do you have a specific suggestion that you think evades both those problems? |

Soulpirate
State War Academy Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 05:41:00 -
[278] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I proposed more than a "hallway". An assortment of rooms of different themes for example. And a lot of players supported that suggestion. CCP is lying if they say they don't know how to make it compelling, there are hundreds of suggestions from players about how they could, some simple, some complex.
If you can't find some value in having a real area to occupy with other pilots as avatars in a station, then don't through the door but stop saying lots of folks wouldn't find value in what that offered and that even something simple in that direction would expand the appeal of Eve to the folks that won't play because they can't leave their ship.
Issler Can you give me an example of something simple, but fun, CCP could do with WiS? So far the suggestions I've heard have either seemed very involved (aka development time hogs) or pointless. Do you have a specific suggestion that you think evades both those problems? Doesn't matter what he says, you will either say it's not fun, pointless, or takes too much work to develop. |

Teamosil
Good Time Family Band Solution
46
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 05:54:00 -
[279] - Quote
Soulpirate wrote:Doesn't matter what he says, you will either say it's not fun, pointless, or takes too much work to develop.
The ideas I've heard so far have certainly all fallen into one of those three categories. Examples include basically just creating an empty hallway players can stand in together (not fun), moving features that you can currently access via the station interface to NPCs you would have to go talk to (pointless), or complex designs involving establishments and NPC offering new types of missions (too much work).
That's why I oppose WiS. I haven't heard any suggestions that could justify the drain of dev resources. But if somebody has an idea that would be easy to make and not completely pointless, I'd totally support that. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
282
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 06:11:00 -
[280] - Quote
Teamosil wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I proposed more than a "hallway". An assortment of rooms of different themes for example. And a lot of players supported that suggestion. CCP is lying if they say they don't know how to make it compelling, there are hundreds of suggestions from players about how they could, some simple, some complex.
If you can't find some value in having a real area to occupy with other pilots as avatars in a station, then don't through the door but stop saying lots of folks wouldn't find value in what that offered and that even something simple in that direction would expand the appeal of Eve to the folks that won't play because they can't leave their ship.
Issler Can you give me an example of something simple, but fun, CCP could do with WiS? So far the suggestions I've heard have either seemed very involved (aka development time hogs) or pointless. Do you have a specific suggestion that you think evades both those problems?
Just because you can't see something as fun doesn't mean other folks wouldn't. For example, two fanfests ago there was an amazing video of a hangar full of a huge range of ships, a viewing gallery of docked ships would be amazing. My corp for example would love a corporate meeting room and lounge. We'd also like a recruiting office. A know a lot of players that would be very happy with that as a start.
That you wouldn't enjoy that isn't my problem because a number of folks would.
Issler
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 :: [one page] |