Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
751
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 04:48:00 -
[271] - Quote
Sarah Schneider wrote:I want moving parts on stargates, stations and POSes :(
Well there is ALWAYS the type of games that goes under your radar
A sex symbol becomes a thing. I just hate to be a thing. -Marilyn Monroe
|

Oberine Noriepa
1164
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 07:30:00 -
[272] - Quote
The effects in this are nothing short of spectacular. The shield reactions... and the ship explosions! Nice!  |

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
753
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 08:52:00 -
[273] - Quote
Oberine Noriepa wrote:The effects in this are nothing short of spectacular. The shield reactions... and the ship explosions! Nice! 
Not to mention proper sound effects. Explosions carry weight with them and the ships follow Newtonian physics A sex symbol becomes a thing. I just hate to be a thing. -Marilyn Monroe
|

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce Brosefs.
107
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 09:11:00 -
[274] - Quote
Dean Clarke wrote:The key word is "scalability".
Your rig can take it? Client turns on tesellation and similar goodies. If not, client turns them off by default.
I don't understand CCP's argument about "waiting for people to update their machines".
Because tesellation as CCP are planning it is more than just a graphics update, since it allows for accurate collision modelling. So it will be a complete redo of the physics engine at the same time, which requires the tesellation to work. So they can't have people running a client without tesellation or the physics engine will break. |

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
753
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 09:39:00 -
[275] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Dean Clarke wrote:The key word is "scalability".
Your rig can take it? Client turns on tesellation and similar goodies. If not, client turns them off by default.
I don't understand CCP's argument about "waiting for people to update their machines". Because tesellation as CCP are planning it is more than just a graphics update, since it allows for accurate collision modelling. So it will be a complete redo of the physics engine at the same time, which requires the tesellation to work. So they can't have people running a client without tesellation or the physics engine will break.
The Newtonian physics are mainly on the procedually generated asteroids which only the client can see. Please refer to the conference A sex symbol becomes a thing. I just hate to be a thing. -Marilyn Monroe
|

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
787
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 16:03:00 -
[276] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Dean Clarke wrote:The key word is "scalability".
Your rig can take it? Client turns on tesellation and similar goodies. If not, client turns them off by default.
I don't understand CCP's argument about "waiting for people to update their machines". Apparently this is not enough to run all mighty Eve, clearly my rig sucks  System Information
Time of this report: 1/9/2013, 14:45:01 Machine name: GEEK OR NOT GEEK Operating System: Windows 8 Professionnel 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.121119-1606) Language: French (Regional Setting: French) System Manufacturer: System manufacturer System Model: System Product Name BIOS: BIOS Date: 04/06/10 09:10:06 Ver: 08.00.15 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.0GHz Memory: 12288MB RAM Available OS Memory: 12280MB RAM Page File: 1530MB used, 15868MB available Windows Dir: C:\Windows DirectX Version: DirectX 11 DxDiag Version: 6.02.9200.16384 64bit Unicode
DxDiag Notes
Display Tab 1: No problems found. Sound Tab 1: No problems found. Sound Tab 2: No problems found. Sound Tab 3: No problems found. Input Tab: No problems found.
DirectX Debug Levels
Direct3D: 0/4 (retail) DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail) DirectInput: 0/5 (retail) DirectMusic: 0/5 (retail) DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail) DirectSound: 0/5 (retail) DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)
Display Devices
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Manufacturer: NVIDIA Chip type: GeForce GTX 460 DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC Device Type: Full Device Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0E22&SUBSYS_34FC1458&REV_A1 Display Memory: 4050 MB Dedicated Memory: 978 MB Shared Memory: 3071 MB Current Mode: 1680 x 1050 (32 bit) (59Hz) Monitor Name: Moniteur Plug-and-Play g+¬n+¬rique Monitor Model: HP w2216 Monitor Id: HWP280B Native Mode: 1680 x 1050(p) (59.954Hz) Output Type: HD15 Driver Name: nvd3dumx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvwgf2umx.dll,nvd3dum,nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um Driver File Version: 9.18.0013.1090 (English) Driver Version: 9.18.13.1090
Eve is harsh, ho dear.
EvE is taxing on the CPU . Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

SoOza N'GasZ
Geese Jugglers
53
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 20:47:00 -
[277] - Quote
Just suscribed to thread. Thank you for this OP . much needed. Legba |

SoOza N'GasZ
Geese Jugglers
53
|
Posted - 2013.02.24 20:59:00 -
[278] - Quote
Isnt it funny how the eve community is fighting and fighting to make eve live up to its potential, bittervets all say it will never happen and ccp just needs to be beaten into submission and ridiculed before it actually acts ?
I think maybe the last critical situation where everyone raided jita might not have been enough.... maybe we need to be much louder to make ccp hear us... Legba |

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2797
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 00:17:00 -
[279] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote:Mobile cards constitute less than 5% of the entire survey. I'm one of these and although it's pretty much midrange, i could (as in: i already have but just don't right now) play on 1920x1080 on highest settings.
Oh and please somebody change the explosions back to something that looks epic. The new explosions are crap **** and way too short. There's no "HAHAHAHAHA BOOOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!" - feeling anymore ... |

Edah Puss
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 00:34:00 -
[280] - Quote
OP: After reading this thread, a wise old saying comes to mind:
Familiarity breeds contempt. |
|

Whim Aqayn
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 00:46:00 -
[281] - Quote
No, I don't think this should be a priority. |

Shaun Klaroh
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 01:17:00 -
[282] - Quote
Some better detail for ship destruction would certainly improve the look and feel of everything. That's not to say that it's bad right now, just an "it could be better" thing. I would like to see drone failures up to a loss of one. Larger ships would be a problem though since wrecks kind of require a unified position across all clients. |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
266
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 01:48:00 -
[283] - Quote
I think CCP has some amazing graphics programmers (the work in the new char creator in particular is literally 10x above the competition), so I'm all for new shiny features added from that team.
My only request that I really want to see added is an optional high-res asset pack. Planet surfaces and backgrounds in particular could really benefit from having a higher resolution. |

4runner
Eternal Profiteers Eternal Syndicate
23
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 01:49:00 -
[284] - Quote
Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly... |

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
798
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 04:32:00 -
[285] - Quote
4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly...
Well obviously we won't be expecting that level of detail just yet. Its a benchmark toward what is technically doable today.
What we should look at is the blast from the past. Such as Homeworld and the Jupiter Incident. Those games are great reference towards what kind of special effects EvE should have Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

ashley Eoner
171
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:18:00 -
[286] - Quote
4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly... If you spent multi thousand dollars to play cry 3 engine games then you got ripped off.
|

Ivy Romanova
All Your Machariel Belong to Ham Industrial Technonauts
803
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 23:28:00 -
[287] - Quote
ashley Eoner wrote:4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly... If you spent multi thousand dollars to play cry 3 engine games then you got ripped off.
I paid 1000 and I'm playing crysis 3 on mostly ultra high thank you very much. Don't be brainwashed. Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

ashley Eoner
172
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 19:47:00 -
[288] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote:ashley Eoner wrote:4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly... If you spent multi thousand dollars to play cry 3 engine games then you got ripped off. I paid 1000 and I'm playing crysis 3 on mostly ultra high thank you very much. Don't be brainwashed. Good for you? |

Diesel47
Bad Men Ltd.
500
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 22:53:00 -
[289] - Quote
4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly...
Cry engine 3 can be run by an xbox, its nothing special. |

Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
814
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 04:35:00 -
[290] - Quote
Diesel47 wrote:4runner wrote:Please tell me how many would unsub if CCP would just say "ahh F*** it lets render the whole game on Cry Engine 3 ?
I would love it, because I can handle it, but most of the people I play with are using what can be called "a avarge laptop" not a multi thousand dollar Gaming rigs like some players.
The Star Citizen game looks just amazing and I will check it out, but asking anywhere near this level of graphics from EVE is just silly... Cry engine 3 can be run by an xbox, its nothing special.
It is when you are on DX11 if full BBAO and at 40fps , but thats not the point of the thread is it? The point is , we've already SEEN , the damage models on this last EvE Con. WE'VE SEEN the various ship models , the Lai Dais , and Quafe , the Concord. THEY ARE ALL OUT THERE! Why is CCP holding them back for consumer use ? Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|
|

Sync Hronization
Liandri Sanctuary Corps Liandri Covenant
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 05:42:00 -
[291] - Quote
I wouldn't mind an explanation as to why CCP can't release an update to allow the launcher to launch in DX9 or DX11.
I know games like The Secret World can, then there is of course all the single player games that have the option as well.
I agree with a lot of you that having explosions updated would be fantastic, not only for the older players looking for something new, but for the curious new players who first lay their eyes on this big explosion.
|

Tarn Kugisa
Infinite Covenant Tribal Band
399
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 05:56:00 -
[292] - Quote
Sync Hronization wrote:I wouldn't mind an explanation as to why CCP can't release an update to allow the launcher to launch in DX9 or DX11.
I know games like The Secret World can, then there is of course all the single player games that have the option as well.
I agree with a lot of you that having explosions updated would be fantastic, not only for the older players looking for something new, but for the curious new players who first lay their eyes on this big explosion.
This
My 7950 hungers for more EVE I can Downlclock mostly everything and get decent framerates at max settings I find that ridiculous I Endorse this Product and/or Service EVE Online Battle Recorder When I press F1 I get ISK |

Tub Chil
Last Men Standing
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:20:00 -
[293] - Quote
What I want most of all in eve is more information from the screen, not just overview. Tactical overlay is pretty bad, it needs to be tweaked heavily. I want to see ship types, their direction, signature, etc. by LOOKING at them. I remember at some point there were new icons on Sisi but CCP didn't continue the project.
undocking, drone launching and other animations would be cool as well. |

Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
815
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:22:00 -
[294] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:What I want most of all in eve is more information from the screen, not just overview. Tactical overlay is pretty bad, it needs to be tweaked heavily. I want to see ship types, their direction, signature, etc. by LOOKING at them. I remember at some point there were new icons on Sisi but CCP didn't continue the project.
undocking, drone launching and other animations would be cool as well.
That would be fabulous !!
However , bear in mind . The current UI is already JAM PACKED full of information and tools , if we fit anymore of it without proper thought. EvE would be come a point and click adventure game .(not sarcastic)
Do you have some concept art you would like to share with us about the vision of the overhauled UI ? Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

Tub Chil
Last Men Standing
40
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:39:00 -
[295] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote:Tub Chil wrote:What I want most of all in eve is more information from the screen, not just overview. Tactical overlay is pretty bad, it needs to be tweaked heavily. I want to see ship types, their direction, signature, etc. by LOOKING at them. I remember at some point there were new icons on Sisi but CCP didn't continue the project.
undocking, drone launching and other animations would be cool as well. That would be fabulous !! However , bear in mind . The current UI is already JAM PACKED full of information and tools , if we fit anymore of it without proper thought. EvE would be come a point and click adventure game .(not sarcastic) Do you have some concept art you would like to share with us about the vision of the overhauled UI ? Current eve UI does not even look like game UI, it's more like a window manager for OS. it's hard to fit anything inside separate icons for ships could work, to show hull types at least (frigate cruiser etc.) signature bloom could be a little dot in icon corner. or more obvious flames from engines.
on selected item window and lock icon we could see 3D image instead of 2d icon that we have now. 3d image is good as it changes direction towards your ship, as enemy approaches or escapes.
direction in space could be indicated by arrow or icon direction. and there should be icon for YOUR ship. |

Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
815
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:44:00 -
[296] - Quote
Tub Chil wrote:Ivy Romanova wrote:Tub Chil wrote:What I want most of all in eve is more information from the screen, not just overview. Tactical overlay is pretty bad, it needs to be tweaked heavily. I want to see ship types, their direction, signature, etc. by LOOKING at them. I remember at some point there were new icons on Sisi but CCP didn't continue the project.
undocking, drone launching and other animations would be cool as well. That would be fabulous !! However , bear in mind . The current UI is already JAM PACKED full of information and tools , if we fit anymore of it without proper thought. EvE would be come a point and click adventure game .(not sarcastic) Do you have some concept art you would like to share with us about the vision of the overhauled UI ? Current eve UI does not even look like game UI, it's more like a window manager for OS. it's hard to fit anything inside separate icons for ships could work, to show hull types at least (frigate cruiser etc.) signature bloom could be a little dot in icon corner. or more obvious flames from engines. on selected item window and lock icon we could see 3D image instead of 2d icon that we have now. 3d image is good as it changes direction towards your ship, as enemy approaches or escapes. direction in space could be indicated by arrow or icon direction. and there should be icon for YOUR ship.
can you uhh.... draw it? Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

marVLs
100
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:20:00 -
[297] - Quote
Imma want:
- new better epic explosions - better textures on big ships - more better nebulas (better space feel not colorfull pony sky) - Sci-fi UI, something like on fanfest 2012 - let us fly in space not some fluid - new hangars (3per faction) - new jump effects - new cloack/decloak effects - new awesome shield effects - remove smoke trails from missiles ffs, get them some sci-fi
And most important improve scalling. Make stations bigger (add orbital towns not only single station) Stations close to planets so it looks like on every space movie/game/even eve trailers... |

Ivy Romanova
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
815
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:23:00 -
[298] - Quote
marVLs wrote:Imma want:
- new better epic explosions - better textures on big ships - more better nebulas (better space feel not colorfull pony sky) - Sci-fi UI, something like on fanfest 2012 - let us fly in space not some fluid - new hangars (3per faction) - new jump effects - new cloack/decloak effects - new awesome shield effects - remove smoke trails from missiles ffs, get them some sci-fi
And most important improve scalling. Make stations bigger (add orbital towns not only single station) Stations close to planets so it looks like on every space movie/game/even eve trailers...
Make the texture to scale too ! The sense of scale of ships is WAAAY OFF! The geometrical and model details of ships doesn't scale at all!!!
When you put an Algos and a Thanatos side by side , you honestly can't tell which one is bigger . Brass shines as fair to the ignorant as gold to the goldsmiths. -Elizabeth I
|

marVLs
100
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:22:00 -
[299] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote:Make the texture to scale too ! The sense of scale of ships is WAAAY OFF! The geometrical and model details of ships doesn't scale at all!!! When you put an Algos and a Thanatos side by side , you honestly can't tell which one is bigger .
True true, space thingy should be epic, in EVE bad scalling destroy everything |

Kagura Nikon
Emptiness.
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:26:00 -
[300] - Quote
Ivy Romanova wrote:Mallak Azaria wrote:If you're actually comparing the current graphics to the ones from a game released in 2003 (the same year people started playing EVe by the way), then you probably need to pony up & buy new computer hardware. You can't really judge when you have everything set to 'low'. its on high thx. Try zooming onto your ship . You'll see the problem.
That is your problem.. eve is properly played fully zoomed out when you see only tiny yellow red and blue boxes! I do not want to waste even move of my computer when this is an excel game in fact. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |