| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13  .. 13 :: one page | 
      
      
      
        | Author | 
        Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) | 
      
      
      
          
          Vaerah Vahrokha 
          Vahrokh Consulting
  3745
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 17:56:00 -
          [301] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote: If each ship costs you "hours of effort" you suck at EVE. 
 
  And if there isn't room in the game for people who suck at it, the game will go away. Right now, such room exists.  
  And this is the two liners recap of my wall of text.  
  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
  Twitter channel | 
      
      
      
          
          Tebb1288 
          Ion Corp. NightSong Directorate
  3
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 18:34:00 -
          [302] - Quote 
          
           
          You shouldn't be trying to find ways to punish players in high sec.
  You should be trying to find ways to encourage players to leave high sec. From there you can kill them.
  Tired of miners all hiding in high sec? Remove the high yield ores (condensed, luminous, etc) from high sec so they only appear in low and null and increase their yield over the 10% and 20% they are now. 
  You want players to stop play solo? Give them Incentives to join groups or move out of npc/one man corps. Increase the taxes on npc corps and lower the refine value of npc stations so that there is a noticeable gain to join a player run corp and move out of the high sec stations. 
  Figuring out how you can storm into high sec to kill and grief these players will just make them quit, and result in less people for you to kill and grief. | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 18:40:00 -
          [303] - Quote 
          
           
          There are two barely on-topic things I would like to bring up.
  I don't play the same game that the 1%ers do. I use the same server, but don't play the same game. I don't want to and there is nothing to force me to do it. I enjoy doing constructive things, like mining, manufacturing, and, yes, null sec anti-pirate roams. I will continue until CCP makes it impossible, because that is what I enjoy.
  I know for a fact that I am not alone.
  Second, I'm not sure where all the talk about people holing up in station due to war decs comes from. I've had a number of corporations over the years. I stopped counting the number of times they were war decced at 16 for some reason. During those war decs, I don't think I ever lost a ship, or paid an ISK. My definition of war decs doesn't have anything to do with killing anyone's ships, especially mine. I believe that the winner is the one who maintains their income during a war and doesn't lose anything, especially the fee you have to pay to maintain the war dec.
  I don't stay in station. I don't need to. I've been doing this too long to not know how to deal with extortionists and other 1%ers. | 
      
      
      
          
          Dave Stark 
           1671
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 18:43:00 -
          [304] - Quote 
          
           
          Tebb1288 wrote:Tired of miners all hiding in high sec? Remove the high yield ores (condensed, luminous, etc) from high sec so they only appear in low and null and increase their yield over the 10% and 20% they are now.   
  so what you're saying is, if asteroids in low sec were worth 20% more than asteroids in high sec, people would mine in low sec? is that honestly what you're implying? 
  please say you're not that stupid. please. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." | 
      
      
      
          
          Davith en Divalone 
          Aegis Coalition Logistics
  48
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 18:54:00 -
          [305] - Quote 
          
           
          Not Politically Correct wrote:First off, I don't think I have ever said, anywhere, that all non-consensual PvP should be taken out of the game. If i did, sorry. Cutting all non-consensual PvP wouldn't solve the problem. (It would be interesting to see what it would do, though.
  Returning to the theme of the thread, IMHO, the current game mechanics seem to me to attract players who are not player friendly. For instance, I travel a lot and watch local chat. I may go months before I see any one say or do anything friendly. The majority of what is posted in those channels isn't even civil. No. I'm not advocating that the chat channels be moderated.  
  Default chat channels are bad in almost every game. Although it could be much worse, Eve doesn't have a Pornshire (a WoW zone notorious for erotic role play, although I've heard it can be hilarious.) The default new player channel though isn't bad, although it does get trolled on a daily basis. I've found corp chat and voice coms here to be among the more friendly and helpful I've ever encountered. 
  My opponent is not my enemy. In chess, you do your best to systematically strip away defenses and put the opposing player into a desperate, unwinnable situation. Then, at the end of the match, we shake hands and walk away, because win or loose, it's about the challenge. That's a central part of not only Eve, but most games out there involving more than one person. 
  But sure, there should be mechanisms out there to enable one to walk away from a lopsided match that's gone beyond good sportsmanship. NPC corps, jump clones, and alternate characters provide this. | 
      
      
      
          
          Jenn aSide 
          Smokin Aces.
  1198
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 18:55:00 -
          [306] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote: If each ship costs you "hours of effort" you suck at EVE. 
 
  And if there isn't room in the game for people who suck at it, the game will go away. Right now, such room exists. Highsec play time to replace a reasonable L4 missioning ship is several hours of L4 missions, even given optimal play. This isn't a problem. Since you are in Goonswarm you probably have some idea of how long it would take to earn the isk to replace a reasonable nullsec ratting ship by ratting with that ship. From what people claim on the forums and the market price of the fits it looks like it takes 2-3 hours to earn enough ratting to replace a decent ratting rig. Having other sources of income, as well as savings from successful play, doesn't change that.  
  This post illustrate a problem I find with how some high sec people think: You have no experience with null sec and are just going off what you heard.
  I'd stake what little reputation I have on the following Statement, the best isk per hour you can get from a sub-capital ship comes from a Vindicator where the pilot has access Serpentis or guristas space (namely Forsaken Hubs). The best I've seen is a 55 mil tick with a vindicator in that situation (a naga is a less efficient but much much cheaper and still really profitable alternative, but thats another story).
   That's at best 165 mil an hour (before taxes) in the best situation you can get regarding null sec anomalies with a single sub-capital ship. With a ship that will at best run you 2 to 3 bil. Thats 12 to 15 ish hours of ratting to replace it (not counting faction spawns and escalations, which are rare enough to not be a factor.
  Compare the above to the 180 mil an hour I make with the exact same ship (vindicator) as a part of a shiney HIGH SEC incursion fleet (120 mil bounties plus 60 mil worth of CONCORD LP).
  I recently helped a Buddie (friend of a friend) who was new to the game get a Fleet Tempest so he could do high sec incursions (he was already bored with missions after playing for 3 months). 3 days later he bough his very 1st machariel that he didn't even have the skills to sit in yet with isk from incursions.....
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Newt Rondanse 
          Magnificent Mayhem Mining
  1
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:13:00 -
          [307] - Quote 
          
           
          Yeah, I don't know nullsec. So? 
  If what I said is wrong, correct it. | 
      
      
      
          
          Jenn aSide 
          Smokin Aces.
  1199
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:18:00 -
          [308] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Yeah, I don't know nullsec. So?   
  That's the entire point, you choose to form and opinion about and make a post concerning something that you admit you don't know anything about (not to be harsh to you personally, but this happens ALL THE TIME with high sec people). Most high sec people will never leave high sec according to CCP, but then still have nerve enough to offer opinons about every aspect of the game and form ill-informed opinions about people who play outside high sec. it's a bad personal tendency that drives me up the wall lol.
  it's not the same for everyone else. EVERY null, low and WH player will start and probably spend signifigant time in high sec where as the opposite isn't true. High Sec folks should understand that before posting....but don't..
  (Again, not to be harsh to you personally, you just tripped over one of my pet peeves about "high sec folk").
 
 Quote: If what I said is wrong, correct it.
  
  I just did lol.
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Newt Rondanse 
          Magnificent Mayhem Mining
  1
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:22:00 -
          [309] - Quote 
          
           
          I was editing while you were responding, and I don't see what my ignorance of nullsec operations has to do with my ability to comment on PvE rewards in highsec.
  For L4 missions an ordinary Dominix with a T2 fit is quite a good choice, but if all you are doing to pay for it is L4 missions it will take a few hours of earnings to cover replacement costs. | 
      
      
      
          
          Tebb1288 
          Ion Corp. NightSong Directorate
  3
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:26:00 -
          [310] - Quote 
          
           
          Dave Stark wrote:Tebb1288 wrote:Tired of miners all hiding in high sec? Remove the high yield ores (condensed, luminous, etc) from high sec so they only appear in low and null and increase their yield over the 10% and 20% they are now.   so what you're saying is, if asteroids in low sec were worth 20% more than asteroids in high sec, people would mine in low sec? is that honestly what you're implying?  please say you're not that stupid. please.  
 
  I said increase their yield higher than 20%. I bolded it so it is easier for you to read.
  The value that would push people to go to low sec would vary by person to person, with some never leaving the safety of high sec. | 
      
      
      
          
          Jenn aSide 
          Smokin Aces.
  1199
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:29:00 -
          [311] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:I was editing while you were responding, and I don't see what my ignorance of nullsec operations has to do with my ability to comment on PvE rewards in highsec.  
 
  You don't see how you ignorance of Null sec affects your post COMPARING high sec pve to null sec pve?
 Quote: For L4 missions an ordinary Dominix with a T2 fit is quite a good choice, but if all you are doing to pay for it is L4 missions it will take a few hours of earnings to cover replacement costs.
  
  Just like in null sec where a good ratting ship like a mach or vindi will take hours of grinding. you can do it in cheaper ships sure, but the cost/time will scale almost the same way. A dominix in Forsaken Hubs will still take time to grind up like it would in a lvl 4 mission, it wouldn't be that much faster at all. 
  You have a common misundertanding of null sec if you think you get isk just from jumping in to a 0.0 system and warping to the 1st belt you find lol. | 
      
      
      
          
          Dave Stark 
           1672
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:30:00 -
          [312] - Quote 
          
           
          Tebb1288 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Tebb1288 wrote:Tired of miners all hiding in high sec? Remove the high yield ores (condensed, luminous, etc) from high sec so they only appear in low and null and increase their yield over the 10% and 20% they are now.   so what you're saying is, if asteroids in low sec were worth 20% more than asteroids in high sec, people would mine in low sec? is that honestly what you're implying?  please say you're not that stupid. please.  I said increase their yield higher than 20%. I bolded it so it is easier for you to read. The value that would push people to go to low sec would vary by person to person, with some never leaving the safety of high sec.  
  sure it does, but low sec ores are already worth 20% more than high sec ores, hence me questioning the stupidity of your statement.
  in short; your suggestion changes nothing. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." | 
      
      
      
          
          Ana Vyr 
          Vyral Technologies
  364
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:41:00 -
          [313] - Quote 
          
           
          As a solo, single account holder player, this is what I do:
  Manufacturing....T2 stuff....this requires me to have a POS for blueprint research. I mine my own fuel and do PI to keep that going. I do research for datacores. I mine my own minerals for manufacturing, and buy what I cannot mine. These activities take quite a bit of time. 
  When I want something different, I split my time between level 4 missioning, and exploration.
  New solo content would be a great thing, but the game does already have many options.
  I did the whole alliance corp nullsec deal way back about four years ago and found it really not to my liking, people were dishonest, teamspeak was required, and we were expected to dance to somebody elses tune. I just don't have the time for that, but if that's what makes you feel happy, I have nothing against it at all. | 
      
      
      
          
          Newt Rondanse 
          Magnificent Mayhem Mining
  1
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:46:00 -
          [314] - Quote 
          
           
          Jenn aSide wrote:Newt Rondanse wrote:I was editing while you were responding, and I don't see what my ignorance of nullsec operations has to do with my ability to comment on PvE rewards in highsec.  You don't see how you ignorance of Null sec affects your post COMPARING high sec pve to null sec pve? Quote: For L4 missions an ordinary Dominix with a T2 fit is quite a good choice, but if all you are doing to pay for it is L4 missions it will take a few hours of earnings to cover replacement costs.
  Just like in null sec where a good ratting ship like a mach or vindi will take hours of grinding. you can do it in cheaper ships sure, but the cost/time will scale almost the same way. A dominix in Forsaken Hubs will still take time to grind up like it would in a lvl 4 mission, it wouldn't be that much faster at all.  You have a common misundertanding of null sec if you think you get isk just from jumping in to a 0.0 system and warping to the 1st belt you find lol.   I wouldn't know about earning isk in nullsec, only what people claim on the forums.
  I trade and do highsec missions and PI. 
  It's relaxing and fun for me, and I don't have a killboard to show for it.
  Am I playing EvE wrong? | 
      
      
      
          
          Jenn aSide 
          Smokin Aces.
  1199
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:54:00 -
          [315] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Newt Rondanse wrote:I was editing while you were responding, and I don't see what my ignorance of nullsec operations has to do with my ability to comment on PvE rewards in highsec.  You don't see how you ignorance of Null sec affects your post COMPARING high sec pve to null sec pve? Quote: For L4 missions an ordinary Dominix with a T2 fit is quite a good choice, but if all you are doing to pay for it is L4 missions it will take a few hours of earnings to cover replacement costs.
  Just like in null sec where a good ratting ship like a mach or vindi will take hours of grinding. you can do it in cheaper ships sure, but the cost/time will scale almost the same way. A dominix in Forsaken Hubs will still take time to grind up like it would in a lvl 4 mission, it wouldn't be that much faster at all.  You have a common misundertanding of null sec if you think you get isk just from jumping in to a 0.0 system and warping to the 1st belt you find lol.  I wouldn't know about earning isk in nullsec, only what people claim on the forums. I trade and do highsec missions and PI.  It's relaxing and fun for me, and I don't have a killboard to show for it. Am I playing EvE wrong?  
  Why would you think you're playing EVE wrong? I am a mostly PVE player who plays in high low and null so (unlike you) I am familiar with a broad spectrum of PVE earning capabilities.
  You're not playing wrong, you're simply doing forum posting wrong lol. Why comment on something you know you don't have any information on? I've simpyl corrected your provably incorrect notions about a place you admit knowing nothing about? That doesn't show much common sense is all I'm saying.
 
 
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Tebb1288 
          Ion Corp. NightSong Directorate
  3
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:55:00 -
          [316] - Quote 
          
           
          Dave Stark wrote:Tebb1288 wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Tebb1288 wrote:Tired of miners all hiding in high sec? Remove the high yield ores (condensed, luminous, etc) from high sec so they only appear in low and null and increase their yield over the 10% and 20% they are now.   so what you're saying is, if asteroids in low sec were worth 20% more than asteroids in high sec, people would mine in low sec? is that honestly what you're implying?  please say you're not that stupid. please.  I said increase their yield higher than 20%. I bolded it so it is easier for you to read. The value that would push people to go to low sec would vary by person to person, with some never leaving the safety of high sec.  sure it does, but low sec ores are already worth 20% more than high sec ores, hence me questioning the stupidity of your statement. in short; your suggestion changes nothing.  
  Except if they were worth 50% or 100% more than I would have to consider mining them. I mine in high sec. 20% more isn't enough to make me leave for lowsec. or nullsec. The increase in profit has to outweigh the risk of loss, or else it is not worth doing.
  I take it you don't do anything in high sec except grief people? If you took a minute to understand why people stay in high sec you could understand what it would take to draw us out.
  Also, I do have an alt to suicide gank miners. Not because it is fun, but because killing someone else mining in my belt and having that ore to myself outweighs the cost of losing that ship. | 
      
      
      
          
          Davith en Divalone 
          Aegis Coalition Logistics
  48
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 19:56:00 -
          [317] - Quote 
          
           
          Natsett Amuinn wrote: The bottom line.  People that stay docked do so because they don't want to lose a ship. I don't care who you are, or where you play. It makes no diffence if you're a high sec industrialist, or -A- claiming it's to deny good fights. 
  When you don't undock it's because you're trying to not to lose a ship, and that's simply pathetic. 
  
  Of course it's about not losing a ship. That's why there's an efficiency ratio on the killboards.
  But, knowingly walking into a trap is playing the game badly and dumb. I've no obligation to give you the easy kill, and every obligation to use the tools at my disposal to take the fight to ground that I think is more in my favor. 
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:04:00 -
          [318] - Quote 
          
           
          Ana Vyr wrote: I did the whole alliance corp nullsec deal way back about four years ago and found it really not to my liking, people were dishonest, teamspeak was required, and we were expected to dance to somebody elses tune. I just don't have the time for that, but if that's what makes you feel happy, I have nothing against it at all.
  
  This is the best description of the whole Null Sec experience I have ever seen. I applaud you.
  Not all people who prefer Hi Sec do so because they have never been to Null. Many of the prefer Hi Sec because they have been to Null, and it is just as Ana stated. (Based solely on the year that I spent there.)
  Someone else was talking about the financial benefits of being in Null Sec. As for mining, no one seems to mention incidents like a corp trying to keep 700,000 units of Compressed Zydrine, because it was worthless. Hmmm.
  Plexes? I ran some when I was out there. For me, the big difference between running complexes and running Level 4s is that I don't like running complexes. Level 4s I don't particularly enjoy, but I don't dislike them.
  The amount of ISK available is NOT a good reason to move to Null Sec, for me, and it wouldn't be even if CCP nerfed the ore.
  Null Sec is basically for a special kind of people. Most are so special that they risk their ships every time they leave Null. I have no desire to be one of those people, and no one can force me to be one. I do just fine with my limited means and aspirations. :)
  Once again, I strongly suspect that I am not alone. As a matter of fact I suspect that there are more players who feel the way I do, than there are players who want to be 1%ers.
 
 
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Keen Fallsword 
          Skyway Patrol
  143
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:05:00 -
          [319] - Quote 
          
           
          Liang Nuren wrote:CCP doesn't only listen to the people who get 10,000 votes from their alliance bloc. You dramatically overestimate the power the CSM holds.
  -Liang
  Ed: Also, CCP has done tons for my mostly solo/super small corp play style since Apocrypha.  
  Very True CSM is for tourism. Its free Iceland tour club. | 
      
      
      
          
          Newt Rondanse 
          Magnificent Mayhem Mining
  1
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:05:00 -
          [320] - Quote 
          
           
          Jenn aSide wrote: Why would you think you're playing EVE wrong? I am a mostly PVE player who plays in high low and null so (unlike you) I am familiar with a broad spectrum of PVE earning capabilities.
  You're not playing wrong, you're simply doing forum posting wrong lol. Why comment on something you know you don't have any information on? I've simpyl corrected your provably incorrect notions about a place you admit knowing nothing about? That doesn't show much common sense is all I'm saying.
 
 
 
   Well, the only thing I got wrong in my original post was how much a reasonable nullsec ratting ship would cost.
  I'd seen the 55M/tick claim before (a lot), and figured that a half-billion isk ship would be able to get a significant portion of that for a well-skilled character. I guess I was wrong there.
  So, what's your take on the need for a place where people can fail at EvE without being pushed out of the game completely? | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:18:00 -
          [321] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:
  So, what's your take on the need for a place where people can fail at EvE without being pushed out of the game completely?
  
  I'm sorry, but I don't think that is going to get you a polite response.
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Bud Austrene 
          Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
  7
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:32:00 -
          [322] - Quote 
          
           
          Perceived risk vs perceived rewards is what motivates me to play semi-solo and in high sec. I believe that is everyone's motivations for playing the way they do. 
  For some, the sense of accomplishment that i get for soloing difficult content, has no value and say that i am dumb to do it the hard way. But i get a lot of satisfaction out of knowing I can soloing things like the Lvl 4 Angel Extravaganza mission bonus room. It would certainly go faster and easier if i invited a few friends.
  But it is not just about the isk or loyalty points it is about playing the game. The challenge is such that the accomplishment has value to me. 
  I like the game the way it is but would not mind if there were more content that required finesse intead 
 
  Yes I am an alt. I see no reason to make it easy for bullies and greifers  | 
      
      
      
          
          Ishtanchuk Fazmarai 
           1123
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:41:00 -
          [323] - Quote 
          
           
          Natsett Amuinn wrote:(usual l33t PvP bitching-bragging about how EVE is too safe).  
  As usual, you left out another important part: if you burn my house, I will kill you so you don't have any chance to burn it again. CCP Unifex: -á"lurking single players (...)-áare the majority of characters on Tranquility"
  ...And so now we know why CCP hasn't done anything for soloers since Apochrypha. | 
      
      
      
          
          Jenn aSide 
          Smokin Aces.
  1199
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:48:00 -
          [324] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Why would you think you're playing EVE wrong? I am a mostly PVE player who plays in high low and null so (unlike you) I am familiar with a broad spectrum of PVE earning capabilities.
  You're not playing wrong, you're simply doing forum posting wrong lol. Why comment on something you know you don't have any information on? I've simpyl corrected your provably incorrect notions about a place you admit knowing nothing about? That doesn't show much common sense is all I'm saying.
 
 
 
  Well, the only thing I got wrong in my original post was how much a reasonable nullsec ratting ship would cost. I'd seen the 55M/tick claim before (a lot), and figured that a half-billion isk ship would be able to get a significant portion of that for a well-skilled character. I guess I was wrong there. So, what's your take on the need for a place where people can fail at EvE without being pushed out of the game completely?  
  High Sec already exists.
  Kidding aside, The whole game is a place where people can and do fail (I know i do, like the time i auto piloted an empty frieghter to jita and went to sleep......
  .....without bother to check if my alliance at the time was war-decced.......
  But a game that calls itself hardcore should never promote failure. Failure in eve comes at a steep cost, and that's part of what makes EVE great. It's sad that some people don't accept that.
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 20:48:00 -
          [325] - Quote 
          
           
          Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:Natsett Amuinn wrote:(usual l33t PvP bitching-bragging about how EVE is too safe).  As usual, you left out another important part: if you burn my house, I will kill you so you don't have any chance to burn it again.   
  That might be considered anti-social behavior, but that's also what I would do.
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 21:02:00 -
          [326] - Quote 
          
           
          Jenn aSide wrote:
  But a game that calls itself hardcore should never promote failure. Failure in eve comes at a steep cost, and that's part of what makes EVE great. It's sad that some people don't accept that.
 
  
  The problem is that a failure early on drives a lot of people away. Suppose you have a Trial Account and you are doing tutorials, and you get your first real frigate. You undock and have an instance of non-consensual PvP. 
  You've got nothing invested in the game except hopes. What incentive is there to try and find out if you could be the most successful Eve player ever, in whatever field you choose? 
  I'm not sure what I would have done if I had lost my first real ship on my first day in the game. They didn't have the "This Is How To Lose A Ship' tutorial then.
 
 
  | 
      
      
      
          
          Newt Rondanse 
          Magnificent Mayhem Mining
  1
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 21:05:00 -
          [327] - Quote 
          
           
          Jenn aSide wrote:Newt Rondanse wrote: So, what's your take on the need for a place where people can fail at EvE without being pushed out of the game completely?
  High Sec already exists. Kidding aside, The whole game is a place where people can and do fail (I know i do, like the time i auto piloted an empty frieghter to jita and went to sleep...... .....without bother to check if my alliance at the time was war-decced....... But a game that calls itself hardcore should never  promote failure. Failure in eve comes at a steep cost, and that's part of what makes EVE great. It's sad that some people don't accept that.   I think that's mostly the point of highsec, and the point of the way NPC faction content is setup.
  Even if someone fails at the game completely they can pick themselves back up in pretty short order. | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 21:07:00 -
          [328] - Quote 
          
           
          Newt Rondanse wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Newt Rondanse wrote: So, what's your take on the need for a place where people can fail at EvE without being pushed out of the game completely?
  High Sec already exists. Kidding aside, The whole game is a place where people can and do fail (I know i do, like the time i auto piloted an empty frieghter to jita and went to sleep...... .....without bother to check if my alliance at the time was war-decced....... But a game that calls itself hardcore should never  promote failure. Failure in eve comes at a steep cost, and that's part of what makes EVE great. It's sad that some people don't accept that.  I think that's mostly the point of highsec, and the point of the way NPC faction content is setup. Even if someone fails at the game completely they can pick themselves back up in pretty short order.   
  Only if they want to. Only if they didn't lose the desire to play this particular game. | 
      
      
      
          
          Dave Stark 
           1675
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 21:20:00 -
          [329] - Quote 
          
           
          Tebb1288 wrote:Except if they were worth 50% or 100% more than I would have to consider mining them. I mine in high sec. 20% more isn't enough to make me leave for lowsec. or nullsec. The increase in profit has to outweigh the risk of loss, or else it is not worth doing.
  I take it you don't do anything in high sec except grief people? If you took a minute to understand why people stay in high sec you could understand what it would take to draw us out.
  Also, I do have an alt to suicide gank miners. Not because it is fun, but because killing someone else mining in my belt and having that ore to myself outweighs the cost of losing that ship.   
  except, you wouldn't consider mining in low sec. you'd go to null sec since it's safer due to the nature of grav sites in industry upgraded systems before we even get on to intel channels etc.
  i live in high sec, i know exactly why i'm there. unwardeccable easily afkable isk comparable to null sec mining without the hassle. i would go to null sec if it was worth it, and even with their ores already being worth 20% more than our high sec ores it isn't worth going.
  the fact that low sec ores are in 0.0 and 0.0 being virtually infinitely safer than low sec means nobody will take low sec seriously for mining. you'd just find yourself a null sec corp, enjoy that 50% extra profit, and never worry about incurring a loss. all you'd "pay" for that 50% profitability is jumping in to an established 0.0 corp and using their logistics chain.
  the problem isn't really to do with the profitability of ores in regards to low sec mining, it's just that low sec is a **** environment to mine in. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." | 
      
      
      
          
          Not Politically Correct 
          Veerhouven Ventures
  83
  
          
                 | 
        Posted - 2013.01.24 21:25:00 -
          [330] - Quote 
          
           
          Dave Stark wrote:
  the problem isn't really to do with the profitability of ores in regards to low sec mining, it's just that low sec is a **** environment to mine in.
  
  In my half-vast experience, the only sensible use for Low Sec is as a pathway to Null Sec. :) | 
      
      
        |   | 
          | 
      
      
      
        | Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13  .. 13 :: one page | 
      
      
      
        | First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |