Any ship is profitable to gank if it has expensive modules in it and no tank modules of any kind fitted. And yes that's how it is designed - otherwise loot wouldn't drop on kills. What you and your kind seem to have done is taken that system and expanded it to some sort of interpretation of EVE as a PvP-optional game where you are entitled to failfit your ships.

I've heard of it.

i heard nullsec is safer then highsec and highseccers belief that highsec is meant to be the safest of places, so really removing CONCORD is logical

Just quoting the DEV be glad to dig it out for you and post the link if you want so you can argue with them over design.

But the "cost" a veteran player pays for the awesome benefit of protection from war should be higher

This Thread is not Dialogue, that's for sure.

GD has become so ludicrous it's just not worth it. More issue specific forums have much better formed proposals and answers.

Do we even really need GD ? Perhaps it should be only Dev Blog and Announcement oriented with comments allowed.

Sorry, but after 3 years of the same it's just seriously old. REAL old.

Generally these arguments end with posters like you crying and ISDs rushing to save the thread.

This Thread is not Dialogue, that's for sure.

GD has become so ludicrous it's just not worth it. More issue specific forums have much better formed proposals and answers.

Do we even really need GD ? Perhaps it should be only Dev Blog and Announcement oriented with comments allowed.

Sorry, but after 3 years of the same it's just seriously old. REAL old.

In short what you will see is all these wardec / NPC threads dead because no one will want to be part of a corp with a terrible PvP rank, careless of what they kill, baring in my recognition is important to most internet spaceship nerds

SOLUTION!!

The problem really here is elite pvpers seem to want to attack those who dont want to attack back. CCP should develop a combat score for a corp, whenever a corp decs a pure carebear corp, the aggressors rank goes down, whenever they dec a PvP corp their rank goes up, this rank is measured by PvP kills NOT PvE kills.

This way 98% of elite pvpers who jerk off on their killboard stats, will be ranked based on 'actual' pvp and not "look at me mam, im punching a kitten" pvp.

In short what you will see is all these wardec / NPC threads dead because no one will want to be part of a corp with a terrible PvP rank, careless of what they kill, baring in my recognition is important to most internet spaceship nerds

They should also put a ticker on those who aggress, if they dock after they aggress, this ticker goes up, it will save people warping to these losers in local.

Not safer per say, Just easier to tell friend from foe.

since everyone shares this advantage it isn't really an issue though, is it?

SOLUTION!!

The problem really here is elite pvpers seem to want to attack those who dont want to attack back. CCP should develop a combat score for a corp, whenever a corp decs a pure carebear corp, the aggressors rank goes down, whenever they dec a PvP corp their rank goes up, this rank is measured by PvP kills NOT PvE kills.

This way 98% of elite pvpers who jerk off on their killboard stats, will be ranked based on 'actual' pvp and not "look at me mam, im punching a kitten" pvp.

In short what you will see is all these wardec / NPC threads dead because no one will want to be part of a corp with a terrible PvP rank, careless of what they kill, baring in my recognition is important to most internet spaceship nerds

They should also put a ticker on those who aggress, if they dock after they aggress, this ticker goes up, it will save people warping to these losers in local.

Again, a solution is to disallow the accepting of courier contracts by players in NPC corps. To freighter contracts, freighter pilots would have to be in player run corps.

Ship v Ship PVP should not be something you can hide from either, tbh, but you can always refrain from undocking.

I would prefer to see restrictions on ships you can undock. if you are in an NPC corp you live with trial account restrictions: no industrials, no freighters, no T2 ships.

I like this solution.

It would solve the "hiding" problem of long term players exploiting NPC corp mechanics GǪ

No, it will not solve anything. The freighter owners will adapt and you will be left with suicide ganking as the only reliable method of controlling freighter traffic. So all that work by CCP, the lost subscriptions, and the extra workload incurred by freighter pilots, will amount to nothing. You will have not improved the situation over what we have today.

You best argument against a nerf is why people expect to be able to interrupt the supply chain in hi-sec. Surely they still have the low-sec and null sec possibilities to cut-off their enemies logistics. Why is there a need at all to HAVE to do it in hi-sec under a war-dec?