| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Knorkor
Spartan Advanced Mining It's Not Fair
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 01:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1155
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 02:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
get some from your orca support?
With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
|

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2586
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 03:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Knorkor
Spartan Advanced Mining It's Not Fair
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. Why do you assume there is a fleet all the time? There is not. I still use a Hulk. Mackinaw has 100m3 more and can have all mining crystals in cargo. There is no reason for the Hulk not having enough cargo for that. |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2587
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:45:00 -
[5] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. Why do you assume there is a fleet all the time? There is not. I still use a Hulk. Mackinaw has 100m3 more and can have all mining crystals in cargo. There is no reason for the Hulk not having enough cargo for that.
The Hulk is designed for mining with Hauler Support. The Mackinaw is designed for solo mining.
You are using a hammer to put a screw into a 2x4 and complaining that it is hard.
Anchor a GSC. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Knorkor
Spartan Advanced Mining It's Not Fair
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
It's not hard, it is annoying. That is all. There is no difference in yield or anything. All I do right now is dock up and get different crystals. Because that is faster than slowboating to a GSC and risk getting killed because I have not been aligned. |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2587
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
Then maybe this fit is for you.
I'll repeat. You are using a Hammer to drive a Screw into a 2x4 and complaining that it doesn't work well.
[Hulk, EHRMEGERD Crystals]
Expanded Cargohold II Expanded Cargohold II
[Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot]
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II
Medium Cargohold Optimization II Medium Cargohold Optimization II This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Dave Stark
1842
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 06:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
you're making miners look bad, biomass yourself. "100k for notifications of stupidity, i love this bounty system." |
|

CCP Eterne
C C P C C P Alliance
2062

|
Posted - 2013.02.07 08:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
I have deleted a troll post from this thread. New Eden Community Representative GÇ+ New Eden Illuminati GÇ+ Fiction Adept
@CCP_Eterne GÇ+ @EVE_LiveEvents |
|

TheSkeptic
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
110
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 08:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Confirming Hulk cargo is fine ... |

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
1547
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 10:16:00 -
[11] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. If you sell your Hulk, you could buy a Mackinaw or several Retrievers, and be much happier.
If it will help, you can contract the Hulk to me for 205m ISK, as that's the current Jita sell price and I could probably use another. Hisec only of course.
You might want to read the Dev Blog - CCP Tallest - Ship Balancing: Mining Barges, especially the section on cargo and the amount of crystals they can haul.
CCP Tallest wrote:Covetor and Hulk are meant to be used in a group, so while they have the highest mining output, they also have the smallest ore bays. The reduction of the cargo holds does have an unfortunate side effect for miners; there is much less space for mining crystals. We alleviated this slightly by cutting the volume of mining crystals in half, but it is now something that miners have to plan for before they go mining. |

Dasola
Rookie Empire Citizens Rookie Empire
141
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 12:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. Why do you assume there is a fleet all the time? There is not. I still use a Hulk. Mackinaw has 100m3 more and can have all mining crystals in cargo. There is no reason for the Hulk not having enough cargo for that.
Then your doing it wrong. Hulk is clearly intended for fleet mining operations. Mackinaw has larger cargobay, becouse its intended for solo mining.
Personally i think exhumers are fine as they are now, they have clear roles now, instead of hulk being end of all thigns... [Insert something funny or smart here]
Good lord has set me on path, sometimes im confused about what he wants from me. But path leads on, towards why he placed me on this wonderfull planet... |

Owen Dallencour
Novaku Inc Rebel Alliance of New Eden
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 14:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
For what it's worth, have to agree -- while it would be nice to have, hulk cargo size is fine. As posted above by the dev, better planning.
|

Iosue
Black Sky Hipsters
157
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 15:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
keep in mind, you don't really need a replacement crystals for all three lazers. i usually only keep one or two of each type. that's enough flexibility for my needs. |

Styth spiting
Ion Corp. NightSong Directorate
281
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 21:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. 350m3 allows you to hold 14 crystals plus the 3 you have fitted.
That gives you enough crystals for 5 ore types and 2 additional crystals. Or if you're in high sec 3 crystals for each ore type and 5 additional crystals for your main ore. Or 3 crystals for each ore type with 1 additional crystal for each and 2 crystals for you main ore.
Seriously you need more then that? You're planning on mining 10+ hours without stopping in a station? Or if you're mining with an orca the orca cant give you access to some?
Well then fit a medium cargohold optimization I and gain an additional 50m3. Or fit 2 and hold 4 or 5 more crystals.
There are so many options available to you, adapt and get used to it. |

Kate stark
Perkone Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 21:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Styth spiting wrote:Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. 350m3 allows you to hold 14 crystals plus the 3 you have fitted. That gives you enough crystals for 5 ore types and 2 additional crystals. Or if you're in high sec 3 crystals for each ore type and 5 additional crystals for your main ore. Or 3 crystals for each ore type with 1 additional crystal for each and 2 crystals for you main ore. Seriously you need more then that? You're planning on mining 10+ hours without stopping in a station? Or if you're mining with an orca the orca cant give you access to some? Well then fit a medium cargohold optimization I and gain an additional 50m3. Or fit 2 and hold 4 or 5 more crystals. There are so many options available to you, adapt and get used to it.
actually it's 13, or you won't be able to swap crystals. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1155
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 22:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Styth spiting wrote:Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. 350m3 allows you to hold 14 crystals plus the 3 you have fitted. That gives you enough crystals for 5 ore types and 2 additional crystals. Or if you're in high sec 3 crystals for each ore type and 5 additional crystals for your main ore. Or 3 crystals for each ore type with 1 additional crystal for each and 2 crystals for you main ore. Seriously you need more then that? You're planning on mining 10+ hours without stopping in a station? Or if you're mining with an orca the orca cant give you access to some? Well then fit a medium cargohold optimization I and gain an additional 50m3. Or fit 2 and hold 4 or 5 more crystals. There are so many options available to you, adapt and get used to it. actually it's 13, or you won't be able to swap crystals. because it'd be impossible to put a crystal in the jet can he's obviously using already, or jettison one crystal to switch?
With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
|

Kate stark
Perkone Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 22:53:00 -
[18] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:Kate stark wrote:Styth spiting wrote:Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks. 350m3 allows you to hold 14 crystals plus the 3 you have fitted. That gives you enough crystals for 5 ore types and 2 additional crystals. Or if you're in high sec 3 crystals for each ore type and 5 additional crystals for your main ore. Or 3 crystals for each ore type with 1 additional crystal for each and 2 crystals for you main ore. Seriously you need more then that? You're planning on mining 10+ hours without stopping in a station? Or if you're mining with an orca the orca cant give you access to some? Well then fit a medium cargohold optimization I and gain an additional 50m3. Or fit 2 and hold 4 or 5 more crystals. There are so many options available to you, adapt and get used to it. actually it's 13, or you won't be able to swap crystals. because it'd be impossible to put a crystal in the jet can he's obviously using already, or jettison one crystal to switch?
you shouldn't have to have empty space to swap a crystal anyway, it's bad coding on CCP's part. |

Not Politically Correct
Veerhouven Ventures
139
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 23:49:00 -
[19] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:Seriously, give it 200 m3 more. We need at least be able to have enough different mining crystals in there. I tend to concentrate on one ore, while mining a big variety into jets. I need those crystals around. 200 m3 more won't break anything. Thanks.
I never mine without one, or two, Orcas, but . . . .
Have you considered putting spare crystals in a GSC? |

Intar Medris
Federation of Elsinore
51
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 03:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Then maybe this fit is for you.
I'll repeat. You are using a Hammer to drive a Screw into a 2x4 and complaining that it doesn't work well.
[Hulk, EHRMEGERD Crystals]
Expanded Cargohold II Expanded Cargohold II
[Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot] [Empty Med slot]
Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II Modulated Strip Miner II, Veldspar Mining Crystal II
Medium Cargohold Optimization II Medium Cargohold Optimization II
God that fit asking to be ganked. Seriously you need Invulnablity Feild or two, and a survey scanner. Maybe even fit a shield booster in case of emergency. And no shield rigs? You're more defenseless than a new born baby.
I try to be nice and mind my business just shooting lasers at rocks. There is just way too many asshats in New Eden for that to happen. |

Knorkor
Spartan Advanced Mining It's Not Fair
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 03:24:00 -
[21] - Quote
Intar Medris wrote:
God that fit asking to be ganked. Seriously you need Invulnablity Feild or two, and a survey scanner. Maybe even fit a shield booster in case of emergency. And no shield rigs? You're more defenseless than a new born baby.
Yup, that is why I would not use it. I use a tank fit, especially since I am in 0.0. But does not matter, I bought a macki and it can hold all the crystals I need while only losing about 150m3 yield per minute. To be honest, I still want that change since I see no reason why the mack should be able to carry a wide variety of crystals while the Hulk is not. |

RubyPorto
Sniggwaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2615
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 03:25:00 -
[22] - Quote
Intar Medris wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Then maybe this fit is for you.
I'll repeat. You are using a Hammer to drive a Screw into a 2x4 and complaining that it doesn't work well.
[Hulk, EHRMEGERD Crystals] God that fit asking to be ganked. Seriously you need Invulnablity Feild or two, and a survey scanner. Maybe even fit a shield booster in case of emergency. And no shield rigs? You're more defenseless than a new born baby.
Maybe the name of the fit could have been a clue.
Also, Shield Boosters to help save you from ganks? 
Knorkor wrote: Yup, that is why I would not use it. I use a tank fit, especially since I am in 0.0. But does not matter, I bought a macki and it can hold all the crystals I need while only losing about 150m3 yield per minute. To be honest, I still want that change since I see no reason why the mack should be able to carry a wide variety of crystals while the Hulk is not.
Because, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, the Mackinaw is designed for Solo mining, and the Hulk is designed for use with fleet support. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Ling Sora
NanoCore Systems
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 17:35:00 -
[23] - Quote
Each exhumer has it's on role. When will people realize this?
I guess old habits die hard. |

Kate stark
Perkone Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 17:47:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ling Sora wrote:Each exhumer has it's on role. When will people realize this?
I guess old habits die hard.
except the skiff. |

Hannibal Ord
Fer-De-Lance
85
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:Intar Medris wrote:
God that fit asking to be ganked. Seriously you need Invulnablity Feild or two, and a survey scanner. Maybe even fit a shield booster in case of emergency. And no shield rigs? You're more defenseless than a new born baby.
Yup, that is why I would not use it. I use a tank fit, especially since I am in 0.0. But does not matter, I bought a macki and it can hold all the crystals I need while only losing about 150m3 yield per minute. To be honest, I still want that change since I see no reason why the mack should be able to carry a wide variety of crystals while the Hulk is not.
This is the most totally ******** thing I have read since I've been away from this game. |

Charles the Miner
Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
For mining ships, bigger and more is always better!
|

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
455
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 14:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
Knorkor wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. Why do you assume there is a fleet all the time? There is not. I still use a Hulk. Mackinaw has 100m3 more and can have all mining crystals in cargo. There is no reason for the Hulk not having enough cargo for that. ^^ I agree with this. The HULK has enough fleet dependance without needing to store crystals in the ORCA as well. Having a cargo hold large enough to hold three of each crystal would not in any way be game breaking.
Not having enough room for crystals can be game breaking though, at least for HULKS not in a fleet. Some players do still jetcan mine with HULKS, although I would use jetted freight cans as they hold way more, and never despawn.
A mack can easily hold a full set of crystals as it only needs two of each. The HULK needs 50% more crystals, so should have a 50% larger cargo hold. And I do mean cargo hold, as in where the spare crystals are stored, not ORE hold where the ore goes, ore holds are as they should be. |

Kate stark
101
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:36:00 -
[28] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:Knorkor wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Get them from your fleet support or anchor a GSC. Why do you assume there is a fleet all the time? There is not. I still use a Hulk. Mackinaw has 100m3 more and can have all mining crystals in cargo. There is no reason for the Hulk not having enough cargo for that. ^^ I agree with this. The HULK has enough fleet dependance without needing to store crystals in the ORCA as well. Having a cargo hold large enough to hold three of each crystal would not in any way be game breaking. Not having enough room for crystals can be game breaking though, at least for HULKS not in a fleet. Some players do still jetcan mine with HULKS, although I would use jetted freight cans as they hold way more, and never despawn. A mack can easily hold a full set of crystals as it only needs two of each. The HULK needs 50% more crystals, so should have a 50% larger cargo hold. And I do mean cargo hold, as in where the spare crystals are stored, not ORE hold where the ore goes, ore holds are as they should be.
i agree with this, if i had to agree with anything.
ccp say they like choices, so a cargo hold big enough for *exactly* three of each type of crystal (minus one, as they will already be in the strips) plus 25m3 spare so you can swap crystals due to the bad coding is the no brainer. your choice is then have crystals for every ore, so you're prepared for every situation, or alternatively sacrifice some types of ore in order to carry reloads.
it's a choice, ccp like choices, right? |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
456
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 21:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
Considering a set of T2 crystals lasts about 10 hours, there really is no reason to need to carry spares. nobody is going to mine for 10 hours without hauling. the hauler can deliver spares, or if solo, when you go to switch to your hauler swap them out.
There is no need to use crystals until they pop. a crystal 90% used will still refine into the same minerals as a fresh unused crystal. Always start with fresh crystals, and reprocess the used ones to get 80-90% of the crystals cost back in minerals.
If you make your own crystals this can save you loads of isk. even buying BPC's when you recycle most of the material costs, you will be making them far cheaper than you can buy them. |

Kate stark
108
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 22:33:00 -
[30] - Quote
there's also no reason why a ship shouldn't be able to carry a full compliment of crystals, but c'est la vie. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2669
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 23:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:i agree with this, if i had to agree with anything.
ccp say they like choices, so a cargo hold big enough for *exactly* three of each type of crystal (minus one, as they will already be in the strips) plus 25m3 spare so you can swap crystals due to the bad coding is the no brainer. your choice is then have crystals for every ore, so you're prepared for every situation, or alternatively sacrifice some types of ore in order to carry reloads.
it's a choice, ccp like choices, right?
That's not a significant "choice" given that there's no reason to carry spares of something you only need to replace once every 8+hrs.
A real choice would be "which mining crystals should I bring with me to mine this belt" or "should I assign different Hulks in my fleet to specialize on different ores in the belt."
... well hey... This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Kate stark
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 07:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:i agree with this, if i had to agree with anything.
ccp say they like choices, so a cargo hold big enough for *exactly* three of each type of crystal (minus one, as they will already be in the strips) plus 25m3 spare so you can swap crystals due to the bad coding is the no brainer. your choice is then have crystals for every ore, so you're prepared for every situation, or alternatively sacrifice some types of ore in order to carry reloads.
it's a choice, ccp like choices, right? That's not a significant "choice" given that there's no reason to carry spares of something you only need to replace once every 8+hrs. A real choice would be "which mining crystals should I bring with me to mine this belt" or "should I assign different Hulks in my fleet to specialize on different ores in the belt." ... well hey...
that's not really a choice.
that's "i need crystals, i shall bring them. then i will need to go out of my way to change them because if i'm mining anywhere that's not high sec i won't have enough room for enough types of crystal"
there's really no choice in the matter, you either have the sufficient crystals or you don't due to the low cargo limit not because of what you put in said cargo bay. you're not making the choice, the choice is thrust upon you. not to mention unless you recycle all part-damaged crystals at the end of the day there's always a need for replacements.
just for the record though; i really don't care, i'm just playing devils advocate here. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2681
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 07:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:That's not a significant "choice" given that there's no reason to carry spares of something you only need to replace once every 8+hrs.
A real choice would be "which mining crystals should I bring with me to mine this belt" or "should I assign different Hulks in my fleet to specialize on different ores in the belt."
... well hey... that's not really a choice. that's "i need crystals, i shall bring them. then i will need to go out of my way to change them because if i'm mining anywhere that's not high sec i won't have enough room for enough types of crystal" there's really no choice in the matter, you either have the sufficient crystals or you don't due to the low cargo limit not because of what you put in said cargo bay. you're not making the choice, the choice is thrust upon you. not to mention unless you recycle all part-damaged crystals at the end of the day there's always a need for replacements. just for the record though; i really don't care, i'm just playing devils advocate here.
If you're not running with a fleet (which implies hauling support) why use a Hulk?
Even if you recycle them, they last ~8 hours. Your hauling support should show up more than once every 8 hours.
Outside of HS, you have massive Roids which means that if you're solo, you'll have to head back to empty your ore bay long before you'll need to change asteroids. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Kate stark
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:That's not a significant "choice" given that there's no reason to carry spares of something you only need to replace once every 8+hrs.
A real choice would be "which mining crystals should I bring with me to mine this belt" or "should I assign different Hulks in my fleet to specialize on different ores in the belt."
... well hey... that's not really a choice. that's "i need crystals, i shall bring them. then i will need to go out of my way to change them because if i'm mining anywhere that's not high sec i won't have enough room for enough types of crystal" there's really no choice in the matter, you either have the sufficient crystals or you don't due to the low cargo limit not because of what you put in said cargo bay. you're not making the choice, the choice is thrust upon you. not to mention unless you recycle all part-damaged crystals at the end of the day there's always a need for replacements. just for the record though; i really don't care, i'm just playing devils advocate here. If you're not running with a fleet (which implies hauling support) why use a Hulk? Even if you recycle them, they last ~8 hours. Your hauling support should show up more than once every 8 hours. Outside of HS, you have massive Roids which means that if you're solo, you'll have to head back to empty your ore bay long before you'll need to change asteroids.
but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting? |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2698
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 16:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting?
And the Jetcans will evaporate long before your crystals break (or are ready for recycling). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Kate stark
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 18:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting? And the Jetcans will evaporate long before your crystals break (or are ready for recycling).
no they won't, you just cycle your jetcans. every 3 mins you can produce a jetcan, that's 20 cans per hour, with a duration of 2 hours, that's up to 40 jetcans you can have active at once. that's roughly a full freighter load (40 jetcans is roughly 1.1m m3) of ore you can mine before jetcans start evaporating.
anyway that really has nothing to do with the fact that giving more cargo space would/wouldn't break the game. as i said, there's really no reason not to give the hulk more cargo space, it just removes tedium from the game. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2708
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 04:36:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:anyway that really has nothing to do with the fact that giving more cargo space would/wouldn't break the game. as i said, there's really no reason not to give the hulk more cargo space, it just removes tedium from the game.
"It wouldn't break the game." What a great reason for buffing things.
If anchoring a GSC, using some of your infinitely recycled jetcan space, or having your fleetmate in the hauler provide you with the crystals you need is too much effort for you, the Hulk is not for you.
By the way. 1.1m m3 is about 12hrs of a Hulk mining solo. That will break around 1.5 sets of crystals. You have space for more than 1.5 sets of crystals, and hidden belts have more than enough Ore to allow you to plan ahead and never have to return for more crystals in those 12 hours (at the end of which, I'll remind you, you're returning to grab your Freighter). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
323
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 08:31:00 -
[38] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting? And the Jetcans will evaporate long before your crystals break (or are ready for recycling). no they won't, you just cycle your jetcans. every 3 mins you can produce a jetcan, that's 20 cans per hour, with a duration of 2 hours, that's up to 40 jetcans you can have active at once. that's roughly a full freighter load (40 jetcans is roughly 1.1m m3) of ore you can mine before jetcans start evaporating. anyway that really has nothing to do with the fact that giving more cargo space would/wouldn't break the game. as i said, there's really no reason not to give the hulk more cargo space, it just removes tedium from the game.
It's intended to be a fleet miner. No need to give it more self sustainability. |

Kate stark
116
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 10:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting? And the Jetcans will evaporate long before your crystals break (or are ready for recycling). no they won't, you just cycle your jetcans. every 3 mins you can produce a jetcan, that's 20 cans per hour, with a duration of 2 hours, that's up to 40 jetcans you can have active at once. that's roughly a full freighter load (40 jetcans is roughly 1.1m m3) of ore you can mine before jetcans start evaporating. anyway that really has nothing to do with the fact that giving more cargo space would/wouldn't break the game. as i said, there's really no reason not to give the hulk more cargo space, it just removes tedium from the game. It's intended to be a fleet miner. No need to give it more self sustainability.
it's not adding self sustainability, it's just removing tedium. |

Akturous
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
80
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 11:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
I can't believe you guys going on about how "hulk is a fleet ship blah blah" ffs get a grip, that's why it has a tiny ore hold. It should have enough cargo to fit all the crystals it's doing to need, so more people fly them so I can gank them and harvest their precious intact armour plates. mmmmmmm Vote Item Heck One for CSM8 |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
465
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 14:24:00 -
[41] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote:but outside of high sec jetcan mining is perfectly viable.
truth be told i find the hulk fine but i honestly see no reason why more space for crystals would be such an issue. they don't have a problem with the skiff or mackinaw carrying a full compliment of crystals so why would it be such an issue for the hulk? or do they think tedium makes mining more interesting? And the Jetcans will evaporate long before your crystals break (or are ready for recycling). Well considering since the new freight containers were introduced there is no need to jetcan mine with actual jetcans. A freight container, while no more secure than a jetcan holds far more, up to 250,000m3, and will never despawn. At least the freight cans I have had sitting at a safe spot since the patch a few months ago have not popped yet.
True you need to drop them off in the belt with another ship, but the enormous freight container is only 2500m3 packaged. And can be jettisoned from a packaged state. I have tested this. So you only need a ship with 2500m3 cargo to drop off a can that will hold 250,000m3. It will not pop after 1-2 hours like a jetcan. and you will spend some time to fill it. Although you then need a freighter to scoop it, any hauler can pick up ore from the can.
These freight containers can be strategically placed through the belt just like GSC's. Only down side is they can not be locked, so are no more secure than jetcans. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3461
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 15:13:00 -
[42] - Quote
I found the switch to a tiny Cargohold for Hulks annoying as well, but I can live with it.
There just seem to be so many last minute arbitrary changes in the game anymore, this one, the sudden scannability of the Orca Fleet Hold, I'm not really sure anymore just how much thought is seriously put into these things by CCP. Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.-á-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde - 1870's |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2708
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:14:00 -
[43] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Well considering since the new freight containers were introduced there is no need to jetcan mine with actual jetcans. A freight container, while no more secure than a jetcan holds far more, up to 250,000m3, and will never despawn. At least the freight cans I have had sitting at a safe spot since the patch a few months ago have not popped yet.
True you need to drop them off in the belt with another ship, but the enormous freight container is only 2500m3 packaged. And can be jettisoned from a packaged state. I have tested this. So you only need a ship with 2500m3 cargo to drop off a can that will hold 250,000m3. It will not pop after 1-2 hours like a jetcan. and you will spend some time to fill it. Although you then need a freighter to scoop it, any hauler can pick up ore from the can.
These freight containers can be strategically placed through the belt just like GSC's. Only down side is they can not be locked, so are no more secure than jetcans.
So fill them with crystals when you drop them off. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Kate stark
127
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Well considering since the new freight containers were introduced there is no need to jetcan mine with actual jetcans. A freight container, while no more secure than a jetcan holds far more, up to 250,000m3, and will never despawn. At least the freight cans I have had sitting at a safe spot since the patch a few months ago have not popped yet.
True you need to drop them off in the belt with another ship, but the enormous freight container is only 2500m3 packaged. And can be jettisoned from a packaged state. I have tested this. So you only need a ship with 2500m3 cargo to drop off a can that will hold 250,000m3. It will not pop after 1-2 hours like a jetcan. and you will spend some time to fill it. Although you then need a freighter to scoop it, any hauler can pick up ore from the can.
These freight containers can be strategically placed through the belt just like GSC's. Only down side is they can not be locked, so are no more secure than jetcans.
So fill them with crystals when you drop them off.
again, all it does is add tedium. there's really no reason to add tedium to the game. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2708
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:56:00 -
[45] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: again, all it does is add tedium. there's really no reason to add tedium to the game.
The only thing adding tedium is your choice to us an inappropriate tool for the job and refusing to adapt that tool (cargo expand your Hulk and you'll have plenty of space). This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Kate stark
130
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:58:00 -
[46] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote: again, all it does is add tedium. there's really no reason to add tedium to the game.
The only thing adding tedium is your choice to us an inappropriate tool for the job and refusing to adapt that tool (cargo expand your Hulk and you'll have plenty of space).
but using a hulk in a fleet IS the appropriate tool for the job. having to move crystals about is just tedious and adds nothing to the game.
i don't massively care, but a fact is still a fact. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
3461
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 20:59:00 -
[47] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote: again, all it does is add tedium. there's really no reason to add tedium to the game.
The only thing adding tedium is your choice to us an inappropriate tool for the job and refusing to adapt that tool (cargo expand your Hulk and you'll have plenty of space). but using a hulk in a fleet IS the appropriate tool for the job. having to move crystals about is just tedious and adds nothing to the game. i don't massively care, but a fact is still a fact.
Do not pay him any mind.  Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.-á-á-á-á-á-á - Oscar Wilde - 1870's |

Kate stark
130
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 21:04:00 -
[48] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Kate stark wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kate stark wrote: again, all it does is add tedium. there's really no reason to add tedium to the game.
The only thing adding tedium is your choice to us an inappropriate tool for the job and refusing to adapt that tool (cargo expand your Hulk and you'll have plenty of space). but using a hulk in a fleet IS the appropriate tool for the job. having to move crystals about is just tedious and adds nothing to the game. i don't massively care, but a fact is still a fact. Do not pay him any mind. 
*shrug* he's right, there are ways around the issue. however the issue doesn't bring anything to the game but tedium, tedium isn't fun, isn't useful, and when games are designed for fun introducing tedium for no reason seems silly. even more so when it's just 1 ship that seems to have an issue. |

Knorkor
Spartan Advanced Mining Infinite Aggression
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 11:01:00 -
[49] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: *shrug* he's right, there are ways around the issue. however the issue doesn't bring anything to the game but tedium, tedium isn't fun, isn't useful, and when games are designed for fun introducing tedium for no reason seems silly. even more so when it's just 1 ship that seems to have an issue.
Exactly. Removing the tedium. That is all. It does not make the game easier nor change the overall capability of the Hulk. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |