Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 23 post(s) |

Freelancer117
So you want to be a Hero
59
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 21:45:00 -
[301] - Quote
This system of voting will give Null sec blocs an unprecedented security to get at least 1 and most likely 2 candidates in  The only way that independents can run is through sheer name recognition or they need to ally themselves into political groups.
I have to congrat CCPgames by playing the meta game on a new level by rigging the rules, either convert or stay on the outside.
This only confirms my suspicion that from now on CCP wants to invest it time into nullsec (Sovereignty, sanctums, alliance mechanics, futher intergration of Dust514, bottom up income, technetium moons, capital fleet force projection, itterate on TiDi)
My only hope is that they dont forget to give good opportunities for small independent entities, Null sec needs to be a place where newer or smaller alliances can survive and larger ones can't easily crush them, add alot of diminishing returns as a prevention imo. http://eve-radio.com/ |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
1173
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:16:00 -
[302] - Quote
Freelancer117 wrote:This system of voting will give Null sec blocs an unprecedented security to get at least 1 and most likely 2 candidates in  The only way that independents can run is through sheer name recognition or they need to ally themselves into political groups. I have to congrat CCPgames by playing the meta game on a new level by rigging the rules, either convert or stay on the outside. This only confirms my suspicion that from now on CCP wants to invest it time into nullsec (Sovereignty, sanctums, alliance mechanics, futher intergration of Dust514, bottom up income, technetium moons, capital fleet force projection, itterate on TiDi) My only hope is that they dont forget to give good opportunities for small independent entities, Null sec needs to be a place where newer or smaller alliances can survive and larger ones can't easily crush them, add alot of diminishing returns as a prevention imo.
Nullsec is perfectly conceived for big bloc security, with instant force projection, hours long grinding of structures and vast buffer space for the early detection of threats. Why should CCP change that instead of devoting efforts to the majority of the game? EVE is Serious Business: You shall not feel entitled to being allowed to play EVE just because you are paying it. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2686
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 23:16:00 -
[303] - Quote
mynnna wrote:I want to make sure I understand this correctly. Say there are 60k votes; the threshold is then 4001 votes. Now say I were to be marked as top preference on 5000 ballots. I would get my 4001 votes at full value and be declared provisionally elected, and then the remaining 999 votes are distributed evenly to the second choices on the 5000 ballots that ranked me as first, giving each slightly less than 0.2 votes apiece. This continues until all seats are filled. Because of the proportional transfer, it doesn't matter whose votes I receive "first", because a portion of all votes transfer.
Is that correct, at least in the basic details? You can find complete details on the Wright-STV algorithm here. It's a bit laborious but pretty straightforward.
A simplified explanation of the algoritm is as follows:
If at any time there only enough candidates left to fill the needed number seats, or that many people are provisionally elected, the election ends.
Total up how many first-preference votes each candidate received.
Any candidates who get more than the threshold are declared provisionally elected. The threshold is 1 + int(number of active votes / (number of seats+1))
The provisionally elected candidate with the most votes distributes his overages. If for example the threshold is 4000 votes, and a candidate gets 5000, then he needs 80% of his voting power to get elected, and has 20% to give away. You can imagine that those ballots are cut into two parts, an 80% part that the candidate keeps, and a 20% part. The 20% part is transferred to the most-preferred candidate on it who has not already been provisionally elected. So if you had been provisionally elected and where transferring a ballot that read "mynnna-Trebor-Malcanis", and I had also already been provisionally elected, the 20% ballot would go to Malcanis.
Once the overages are distributed, a check is made to see if anyone else has been provisionally elected.
Overage distribution continues until there are no provisionally elected candidates with overages to distribute. Note that fractional ballots that went to a candidate who became provisionally elected will be fractionally distributed -- if a candidate got a 20% ballot and himself distributes 10%, then he keeps an 18% ballot and sends on a 2% one!
At this point, if we don't have enough provisionally elected candidates, the candidate with the fewest number of first-place votes is eliminated (if there is a tie, the loser is determined randomly). His name is crossed off all the ballots they appear on. Any ballots that don't have any names left are considered "exhausted" and are discarded (which reduces the threshold in the next round of the election).
The election is then restarted from scratch, with one less candidate. All those ballots are glued back together, and we go through the whole process again. If you need to get rid of 25 candidates, you're going to go through 25 rounds unless you get lucky. Better sharpen those scissors...
I am coding up my own election software as a cross-check (it's a fun little project). There are a couple of fine points I want to confirm with CCP Veritas, but that's basically it. Re-elect Trebor to CSM8 GÇó Member of CSM 5-7 GÇó My CSM Blog |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1723
|
Posted - 2013.03.02 12:04:00 -
[304] - Quote
I will admit it is kind of funny that we are using the voting system designed to give the fish and chip party an extra seat in the senate.
Please Explain
But one other question, as the votes have to be stored in a database to work out the preference voting will they remain anonymous? EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron Heart 0f Darkness
1633
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 00:13:00 -
[305] - Quote
Ellahan Vhektor wrote:Cass Lie wrote:So wormholers will have a primary after all. yes his name is Cipreh you will find his thread here as a member of his corp 7 months now i would like to voice my oppinion of him i think hes a fair and just leader and some one that you want to represent your voice if you are a wormhole capsuler CIPREH FOR ALL THE CSM'S! 
Given my experience with Clann Fian, I'll be sure to put him at the bottom of my list, or leave him off it entirely if that is an option. Treacherous, no good, back-stabbing...
edit: Of course, I'm sure someone had their reasons, but people don't forget these things. Honestly, I didn't like that alliance much anyway. zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron Heart 0f Darkness
1633
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 00:22:00 -
[306] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I will admit it is kind of funny that we are using the voting system designed to give the fish and chip party an extra seat in the senate. Please Explain  But one other question, as the votes have to be stored in a database to work out the preference voting will they remain anonymous?
Highsec is the fish and chip party. Makes sense now doesn't it.  zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Bubbleboylol
BlackWater Mercenarys
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 06:50:00 -
[307] - Quote
So why does it have to be that way? Just curious? Why not have the people running and the people voting? THe people voting get an in game email for who to vote for they click who they want then submit it. Now if CCP does not lie and or cheat the system it would work just fine..... Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 09:07:00 -
[308] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:So why does it have to be that way? Just curious?
..
Smells a bit like elections rigging....
It's not nefarious, it's just the closest some nerds* can come to solving a social issue with math.
* I say this in an endearing way "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Bubbleboylol
BlackWater Mercenarys
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 09:17:00 -
[309] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:So why does it have to be that way? Just curious?
..
Smells a bit like elections rigging.... It's not nefarious, it's just the closest some nerds* can come to solving a social issue with math. * I say this in an endearing way
yarr Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1725
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 10:21:00 -
[310] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:So why does it have to be that way? Just curious?
..
Smells a bit like elections rigging.... It's not nefarious, it's just the closest some nerds* can come to solving a social issue with math. * I say this in an endearing way Yes but what I want to know as this system was built for the fish and chip party to get another seat and this will allow Goonswarm to easily get that other seat...therefore Goonswarm is the fish and chip party....so
When do they start talking about cutting off pensions for single mothers?
Sorry Australian humor EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2688
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:17:00 -
[311] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:But one other question, as the votes have to be stored in a database to work out the preference voting will they remain anonymous? Individual votes will be anonymous (ie: nobody will know that you listed me as your top preference).
However, aggregate ballots will be published so that the election can be confirmed by interested observers. That is, a list will be generated that has entries like this:
52 ballots had preferences A,B,C,D,E,F,G 33 ballots had preferences G,A,L,Q,B,E,D,C
and so on. Re-elect Trebor to CSM8 GÇó Member of CSM 5-7 GÇó My CSM Blog |

Vince Snetterton
255
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:24:00 -
[312] - Quote
Has the HBC/CFC voting bloc published who the top ten vote-getters will be yet, or are they still sorting that out internally? |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
1227
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 17:44:00 -
[313] - Quote
Vince Snetterton wrote:Has the HBC/CFC voting bloc published who the top ten vote-getters will be yet, or are they still sorting that out internally?
You can bet that every last piece of literature on how to rig that Wright algorythm through ballot stuffing is being scrutinized with undeterred attention. EVE is Serious Business: You shall not feel entitled to being allowed to play EVE just because you are paying it. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
579
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 18:05:00 -
[314] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:You can bet that every last piece of literature on how to rig that Wright algorythm through ballot stuffing is being scrutinized with undeterred attention.
We can only hope.
Praise be to James.
|

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1727
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:45:00 -
[315] - Quote
Another question
As this election is all about not wasting votes, will the preliminary vote have an up to date counter or a greying out of candidates to show those that have reached the 200 votes required to go on the main ballot?
As is seems strange to have the main as an STV and the prelim as a first past the post. EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2688
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 21:59:00 -
[316] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:As this election is all about not wasting votes, will the preliminary vote have an up to date counter or a greying out of candidates to show those that have reached the 200 votes required to go on the main ballot?
As is seems strange to have the main as an STV and the prelim as a first past the post. The first election is not FPTP since there is no limit on how many can qualify. It's just a hoop you have to jump through.
No decision has been made (AFAIK) as to whether there will be any indication that candidates have made it past the threshold. My personal position is that CCP should inform the candidates when they have qualified, and leave it up to them whether they want to reveal that information. Also that the preliminary election is probably not going to achieve what they want. Re-elect Trebor to CSM8 GÇó Member of CSM 5-7 GÇó My CSM Blog |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1727
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 01:43:00 -
[317] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:As this election is all about not wasting votes, will the preliminary vote have an up to date counter or a greying out of candidates to show those that have reached the 200 votes required to go on the main ballot?
As is seems strange to have the main as an STV and the prelim as a first past the post. The first election is not FPTP since there is no limit on how many can qualify. It's just a hoop you have to jump through. No decision has been made (AFAIK) as to whether there will be any indication that candidates have made it past the threshold. My personal position is that CCP should inform the candidates when they have qualified, and leave it up to them whether they want to reveal that information. Also that the preliminary election is probably not going to achieve what they want. Ok so its not FPTP but it is still weird to go through this much for the main election and then have vote wasting in the prelim. EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

rodyas
tie fighters inc
1058
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 06:57:00 -
[318] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:As this election is all about not wasting votes, will the preliminary vote have an up to date counter or a greying out of candidates to show those that have reached the 200 votes required to go on the main ballot?
As is seems strange to have the main as an STV and the prelim as a first past the post. The first election is not FPTP since there is no limit on how many can qualify. It's just a hoop you have to jump through. No decision has been made (AFAIK) as to whether there will be any indication that candidates have made it past the threshold. My personal position is that CCP should inform the candidates when they have qualified, and leave it up to them whether they want to reveal that information. Also that the preliminary election is probably not going to achieve what they want. Ok so its not FPTP but it is still weird to go through this much for the main election and then have vote wasting in the prelim.
Its a business Frying Doom, the waste gets cast aside. Into a lake or an ocean even for the better.
Those wasted votes on the prelims, aren't business enough, or matter too much, so they are caste aside. That way people will focus their strength into voting that will mean business, so no votes are wasted then, so business won't be hurt.
You have to look at determining waste in the business sense Frying Doom to understand this. Waste that has no strength or focus is really waste then.
You keep acting like CCP is a political body over the game or new eden universe, its not, they are a business. This is how you have to look at things to understand, what is happening.
Most of this makes perfect business and what else would you expect from an expert masterful business. Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1729
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 07:21:00 -
[319] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:As this election is all about not wasting votes, will the preliminary vote have an up to date counter or a greying out of candidates to show those that have reached the 200 votes required to go on the main ballot?
As is seems strange to have the main as an STV and the prelim as a first past the post. The first election is not FPTP since there is no limit on how many can qualify. It's just a hoop you have to jump through. No decision has been made (AFAIK) as to whether there will be any indication that candidates have made it past the threshold. My personal position is that CCP should inform the candidates when they have qualified, and leave it up to them whether they want to reveal that information. Also that the preliminary election is probably not going to achieve what they want. Ok so its not FPTP but it is still weird to go through this much for the main election and then have vote wasting in the prelim. Its a business Frying Doom, the waste gets cast aside. Into a lake or an ocean even for the better. Those wasted votes on the prelims, aren't business enough, or matter too much, so they are caste aside. That way people will focus their strength into voting that will mean business, so no votes are wasted then, so business won't be hurt. You have to look at determining waste in the business sense Frying Doom to understand this. Waste that has no strength or focus is really waste then. You keep acting like CCP is a political body over the game or new eden universe, its not, they are a business. This is how you have to look at things to understand, what is happening. Most of this makes perfect business and what else would you expect from an expert masterful business. Ok well what I would expect from a "expert masterful business", compared to CCP I will not go into as I think the forum server would explode.
But what your saying is that first they got into trouble with the Norwegians for being a gambling site and now your saying we need to contact the UN for electoral assistance as CCP is illegally dumping votes and contaminating the political wilderness.
So now we just need a civil rights CSM candidate EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
658
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 07:48:00 -
[320] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:
The old system, flawed as FPTP is, was moving towards a trend of blocs only putting forth a single official candidiate. This was in large part due to the fact that more than one candidate was completely unnecessary - there were no votes or anything of the sort, everything that needed to be decided (chair, who goes to Iceland) was decided before anyone took office, so "stacking the deck" was a pointless gesture. What this new system has done is introduce the CSM voting on things AND given a voting system that lends itself towards multiple candidates (or at the very least allowing nullsec to dictate who the majority of the council are), which undoes all of that. That's not really a good thing, especially when you're still trying to convince non-bloc-aligned people to actually care enough to participate.
^^ +1 What I was hoping for when I heard there was going to be an electoral change would be a way to allow regional voting so the CSM would be more diversely populated. What it sounds like we'll get is a tyrany of the minority providing CCP with wildly skewed representation of the customer base and I anticipate voter turnout percentage to plummet especiallywith non-bloc customer base.
Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |
|

Indahmawar Fazmarai
1235
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 07:48:00 -
[321] - Quote
@Trebor:
By the way, do you know wether there are any plans to provide candidate insight for the preliminary election? Like a single article explaining who are the candidates, what do they stand for and why should we help them pass the threshold?
Or will that be left to each candidate's initiative so essentially we'll have half a dozen comprehensive dossiers, a few uninformative and incomplete introductions and a bunch of one-liner forum gibberish?  EVE is Serious Business: You shall not feel entitled to being allowed to play EVE just because you are paying it. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 07:59:00 -
[322] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:+1 What I was hoping for when I heard there was going to be an electoral change would be a way to allow regional voting so the CSM would be more diversely populated. What it sounds like we'll get is a tyrany of the minority providing CCP with wildly skewed representation of the customer base and I anticipate voter turnout percentage to plummet especiallywith non-bloc customer base.
What's really funny is that the "minority" you refer to (obv. you mean nullsec) was pretty firmly AGAINST any kind of change to the voting system (you can check Xhagen's voting reform thread in Jita Park if you don't believe me). If CCP was swayed by anyone (and that's a big IF), it was by people like yourself and Frying Doom crying and screaming about NULL SEC LOBBY GROUPS and other such nonsense that would lead CCP to believe that the current population was not being fairly represented.
So hey, congrats, I guess? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
658
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:05:00 -
[323] - Quote
Quote: - 12th GÇô 20th of March: candidacy application period - 22nd GÇô 29th of March: Pre-Election
For the pre-election the voters will be given the RL names connected with the Candidates' characters names correct? Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
658
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:13:00 -
[324] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:
The old system, flawed as FPTP is, was moving towards a trend of blocs only putting forth a single official candidiate. This was in large part due to the fact that more than one candidate was completely unnecessary - there were no votes or anything of the sort, everything that needed to be decided (chair, who goes to Iceland) was decided before anyone took office, so "stacking the deck" was a pointless gesture. What this new system has done is introduce the CSM voting on things AND given a voting system that lends itself towards multiple candidates (or at the very least allowing nullsec to dictate who the majority of the council are), which undoes all of that. That's not really a good thing, especially when you're still trying to convince non-bloc-aligned people to actually care enough to participate.
Snow Axe wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:+1 What I was hoping for when I heard there was going to be an electoral change would be a way to allow regional voting so the CSM would be more diversely populated. What it sounds like we'll get is a tyrany of the minority providing CCP with wildly skewed representation of the customer base and I anticipate voter turnout percentage to plummet especiallywith non-bloc customer base. What's really funny is that the "minority" you refer to (obv. you mean nullsec) was pretty firmly AGAINST any kind of change to the voting system (you can check Xhagen's voting reform thread in Jita Park if you don't believe me). If CCP was swayed by anyone (and that's a big IF), it was by people like yourself and Frying Doom crying and screaming about NULL SEC LOBBY GROUPS and other such nonsense that would lead CCP to believe that the current population was not being fairly represented. So hey, congrats, I guess?
And yet I guess CCP took what we said & gamed created a system that'll probably do the exact opposite of what we were 'screaming' for  Without compulsorary sufferage like in the country they are modelling the system over (Australia) this thing is missing a major component that would make it work.
I hope I'm wrong but this sounds like Malcanis's rule about newbies in overdrive Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:26:00 -
[325] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:And yet I guess CCP took what we said & gamed a system that'll do the exact opposite of what we are 'screaming' for  Without compulsorary sufferage like in the country they are modelling the system over (Australia) this thing is missing a major component that would make it work.
Notice that at no point did I say CCP's changes were good? I argued at great length against changing anything when the topic came up, precisely because the problem is the low voting turnout, not the voting system. What I'm saying is that at some point CCP got it into their heads to push full steam ahead with a voting system change, and it sure as **** wasn't nullsec interests pushing that attitude. Your attempts to pin that one on us are about as wrong as can be. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1731
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:33:00 -
[326] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:+1 What I was hoping for when I heard there was going to be an electoral change would be a way to allow regional voting so the CSM would be more diversely populated. What it sounds like we'll get is a tyrany of the minority providing CCP with wildly skewed representation of the customer base and I anticipate voter turnout percentage to plummet especiallywith non-bloc customer base. What's really funny is that the "minority" you refer to (obv. you mean nullsec) was pretty firmly AGAINST any kind of change to the voting system (you can check Xhagen's voting reform thread in Jita Park if you don't believe me). If CCP was swayed by anyone (and that's a big IF), it was by people like yourself and Frying Doom crying and screaming about NULL SEC LOBBY GROUPS and other such nonsense that would lead CCP to believe that the current population was not being fairly represented. So hey, congrats, I guess? You might want to read that thread again snow axe, while to start I did like the idea of a new voting system during part of tebors thread by the time CCP Xhagens was around I wanted a player awareness campaign, as on looking at a lot of the STV systems I realized it would further make the CSM filled with Null sec...So don't blame me for something I argued against. EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:38:00 -
[327] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:You might want to read that thread again snow axe, while to start I did like the idea of a new voting system during part of tebors thread by the time CCP Xhagens was around I wanted a player awareness campaign, as on looking at a lot of the STV systems I realized it would further make the CSM filled with Null sec...So don't blame me for something I argued against.
Yeah, you did, but when you say that sort of stuff in the same breath as all of your other garbage about the CSM being a nullsec lobby group (when it was about as diverse a CSM as you could get), the real message comes across loud and clear (i.e. the CSM is not fairly representing players). Besides, as we can see with these developments, by the time Xhagen's thread came around it was already too late - CCP was going to change the system and that was that. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1731
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 08:48:00 -
[328] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Frying Doom wrote:You might want to read that thread again snow axe, while to start I did like the idea of a new voting system during part of tebors thread by the time CCP Xhagens was around I wanted a player awareness campaign, as on looking at a lot of the STV systems I realized it would further make the CSM filled with Null sec...So don't blame me for something I argued against. Yeah, you did, but when you say that sort of stuff in the same breath as all of your other garbage about the CSM being a nullsec lobby group (when it was about as diverse a CSM as you could get), the real message comes across loud and clear (i.e. the CSM is not fairly representing players). Besides, as we can see with these developments, by the time Xhagen's thread came around it was already too late - CCP was going to change the system and that was that. Actually I said almost exactly that, the CSM does not fairly represent the populous of EvE and things need to change. Yes it was still acting like a Null sec lobby before it became the Pro-CCP cheer squad.
It still revolves around what I have been saying, Education of the Masses.
Not some weird voting system designed so that a minority party has the ability to claim an extra seat in the senate that it could not under Australian voting laws. EvE players have no voice. Just don't bother voting for the CSM, really its not worth the energy.
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2688
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 11:06:00 -
[329] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:By the way, do you know wether there are any plans to provide candidate insight for the preliminary election? Like a single article explaining who are the candidates, what do they stand for and why should we help them pass the threshold? I know CCP intends to do more, but I don't know if they will do this. But it's a decent idea and I will make sure that Xhagen and Dolan are pointed to your post.
DarthNefarius wrote:For the pre-election the voters will be given the RL names connected with the Candidates' characters names correct? AFAIK, yes. Re-elect Trebor to CSM8 GÇó Member of CSM 5-7 GÇó My CSM Blog |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
1235
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 14:40:00 -
[330] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:By the way, do you know wether there are any plans to provide candidate insight for the preliminary election? Like a single article explaining who are the candidates, what do they stand for and why should we help them pass the threshold? I know CCP intends to do more, but I don't know if they will do this. But it's a decent idea and I will make sure that Xhagen and Dolan are pointed to your post.
I hope they do, as so far the most comprehensive source of information are Crossing Zebra's podcasts and for a number of reasons (mostly time and language) they aren't very useful to me.
EVE is Serious Business: You shall not feel entitled to being allowed to play EVE just because you are paying it. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 .. 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |