| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country
5584
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:22:00 -
[121] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:OMG James 315 is an absolute KING of emergent game play. look at all the butthurting people he's ticked off, and this thread didn't even start off as anything to do with minig or the new order etc.
When you can make people cry at the mere MENTION of your name or group (ie "New Order"), you've simply won EVE. Goons needed a whole allaince to tick people off, and james did it with some alts and a few friends. I find that amazing.
Bat Country only needed 15 people to tick off most bears last year. Honestly it is not all that hard to do, you should give it a try |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1234
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:36:00 -
[122] - Quote
1-4 pilots is usually enough to tick off most bears.
It's surprising how _FAST_ a system clears out when 2 or 3 pilots go flashy red... One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 11:55:00 -
[123] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:1-4 pilots is usually enough to tick off most bears.
It's surprising how _FAST_ a system clears out when 2 or 3 pilots go flashy red...
By the definitions presented in this thread the "industrialist" would hang around and wait to get ganked? yeah right, but if they do the sensible thing because a bunch of red carebears have waltzed into the system then suddenly they become the carebear?
Docking when gankers come into the system is simply a reduction of isk-losses, strangely enough the exact same reason gankers use cheap ships to gank in, the reduction of cost.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
6320
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 12:11:00 -
[124] - Quote
Domina Trix wrote:Velicitia wrote:1-4 pilots is usually enough to tick off most bears.
It's surprising how _FAST_ a system clears out when 2 or 3 pilots go flashy red... By the definitions presented in this thread the "industrialist" would hang around and wait to get ganked? yeah right, but if they do the sensible thing because a bunch of red carebears have waltzed into the system then suddenly they become the carebear? Docking when gankers come into the system is simply a reduction of isk-losses, strangely enough the exact same reason gankers use cheap ships to gank in, the reduction of cost.
The problem isn't with the people who dock up their industrial ships, they're at least paying attention, it's the ones that are so oblivious to their surroundings or afk that they remain where they are, and then whine, and demand changes, when they explode.
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13241
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 12:25:00 -
[125] - Quote
Domina Trix wrote:Velicitia wrote:1-4 pilots is usually enough to tick off most bears.
It's surprising how _FAST_ a system clears out when 2 or 3 pilots go flashy red... By the definitions presented in this thread the "industrialist" would hang around and wait to get ganked? No. By the definitions presented in this thread, the GÇ£industrialistsGÇ¥ would have a back-up plan that they'd initiate, and would not be ticked off by it.
There's absolutely no need to dock up just because there are gankers in the system. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Domina Trix
McKNOBBLER DRINKING CLAN
6
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 12:37:00 -
[126] - Quote
Quote:No. By the definitions presented in this thread, the GÇ£industrialistsGÇ¥ would have a back-up plan that they'd initiate, and would not be ticked off by it.
There's absolutely no need to dock up just because there are gankers in the system.
Tanking for a possible gank is just one way of dealing with the threat but lowers yield.
Fitting for yield increases the risk of losing a ship to gankers but this is mitigated somewhat by warping whenever red names appear in local.
Those are just two ways to deal with the threat of ganking, yet one gets called an "industrialist" and the other "carebear".
Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about having the game changed to suit them. Two of the defining characteristics of a carebear are wanting other players to play the way the carebear wants and whining on the forums for the game to change when they don't. Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about wanting the game changed to suit them. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13241
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 13:03:00 -
[127] - Quote
Domina Trix wrote:Tanking for a possible gank is just one way of dealing with the threat but lowers yield.
Fitting for yield increases the risk of losing a ship to gankers but this is mitigated somewhat by warping whenever red names appear in local.
Those are just two ways to deal with the threat of ganking, yet one gets called an "industrialist" and the other "carebear". Eh, no. Neither is called either.
Quote:Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about having the game changed to suit them. You haven't been on the forums much, then. Just have a quick search for the bajillion GÇ£buff hulk/nerf gankingGÇ£ threads we've had.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2973
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 14:48:00 -
[128] - Quote
Domina Trix wrote:Tanking for a possible gank is just one way of dealing with the threat but lowers yield.
Fitting for yield increases the risk of losing a ship to gankers but this is mitigated somewhat by warping whenever red names appear in local.
Those are just two ways to deal with the threat of ganking, yet one gets called an "industrialist" and the other "carebear".
No, both of those approaches fit quite handily under the "industrialist" heading, per OP's definition.
The "carebear"* doesn't tank their mackinaw and makes no attempt to warp away (usually because they're AFK), and then is upset and stumped over the burning wreckage that was their 200m ISK ship.
*again, OP's definition. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1234
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 14:58:00 -
[129] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Domina Trix wrote:Velicitia wrote:1-4 pilots is usually enough to tick off most bears.
It's surprising how _FAST_ a system clears out when 2 or 3 pilots go flashy red... By the definitions presented in this thread the "industrialist" would hang around and wait to get ganked? No. By the definitions presented in this thread, the GÇ£industrialistsGÇ¥ would have a back-up plan that they'd initiate, and would not be ticked off by it. There's absolutely no need to dock up just because there are gankers in the system.
yeah, bastards camped the gates...     One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
1069
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 15:48:00 -
[130] - Quote
Here's another difference:
Carebear: The minerals I mine/blueprints I own/commodities I produce/Datacores I farm are free
Industrialist: Everything gets calculated as if I would buy it and if I don't make 5-10% profit it's not worth my time unless there are huge numbers. Mining Overhaul Nothing changed since 2008. |

Alexzandvar Douglass
Shogun's Samurai Unclaimed.
109
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:22:00 -
[131] - Quote
The easiest solution to all issues is just mine in nullsec.
Iv always mined in nullsec, have never, ever, lost a single barge! And I have all the Veldspar I want to sell at high prices to super cap builders! |

Kane Alvo
SQUIDS.
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:25:00 -
[132] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:The easiest solution to all issues is just mine in nullsec.
Iv always mined in nullsec, have never, ever, lost a single barge! And I have all the Veldspar I want to sell at high prices to super cap builders!
Don't let Malcanis and his null bear entourage see this post. There's still trying to convince us that null industry needs a buff.
 Caldari Militia -áGÿ£GÿàGÿP Psychotic Monk for CSM8 |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
523
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:34:00 -
[133] - Quote
Why the fascination with ganking indust... careb... barges and exhumers?
Does it somehow prove you are an awesome PvPer when you can suicide gank a ship that can't shoot back?
I just don't understand why SO many people seem to think that EVE will be horrible if they can't fly around blowing up indt... careb... mining barges and exhumers all day.
Are you really that fail at PvPing against ships that can shoot back?
Explain it to me why EVE will die if you can't get your jollies blowing up ships of people that just want to be left alone.
Do you also salt snails and pull the wings off flies for jollies? |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
918
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:42:00 -
[134] - Quote
Kane Alvo wrote:Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:The easiest solution to all issues is just mine in nullsec.
Iv always mined in nullsec, have never, ever, lost a single barge! And I have all the Veldspar I want to sell at high prices to super cap builders! Don't let Malcanis and his null bear entourage see this post. There's still trying to convince us that null industry needs a buff.  yes that single-line anecdote from some guy has convinced me completely |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
918
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:43:00 -
[135] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Why the fascination with ganking indust... careb... barges and exhumers?
Does it somehow prove you are an awesome PvPer when you can suicide gank a ship that can't shoot back?
I just don't understand why SO many people seem to think that EVE will be horrible if they can't fly around blowing up indt... careb... mining barges and exhumers all day.
Are you really that fail at PvPing against ships that can shoot back?
Explain it to me why EVE will die if you can't get your jollies blowing up ships of people that just want to be left alone.
Do you also salt snails and pull the wings off flies for jollies? I asked Cleverbot.
Quote: Benny Ohu: Does it somehow prove you are an awesome PvPer when you can suicide gank a ship that can't shoot back?
Cleverbot: Your only 17 that is why. Go back to school infant.
|

Karle Tabot
State War Academy Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 17:25:00 -
[136] - Quote
Another version:
I look up from working on the work I brought home from the office, which pays me enough for doing extra high level real life work to buy a good number of plex for each hour of that extra real life real money work I do. I see the results and consider my options. I can just shrug it off, get another whatever and get back to what I was doing and leave it at that.
Or I could get pissed off, and do that, and also put a one billion bounty on each of those pilots. Or I could contact some available mercs in game and make a private contract with them to make it cost those pilots far more than it cost me. It would cost me some real time money for plex, but I really do make a lot of that real time money doing that work while mining, and the cost of that revenge is not even a drop in the bucket.
Most likely I am just going to take option number one simply because the same logic that tells me losing an imaginary ship and ISK that is not a fraction of the real time money I make being able to do extra real money work while sometimes afk mining also tells me it is not worth it to so target people simply playing the game.
There are things that could make it worth it, such as smart assed comments in local or my mail.
Now why even bother to post this? Far too many assume just because you are mining, even afk mining, at the time, that you are a target they can hit at no risk.
You are occasionally going to be in for a really bad surprise. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
1471
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 17:32:00 -
[137] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Why the fascination with ganking indust... careb... barges and exhumers?
Does it somehow prove you are an awesome PvPer when you can suicide gank a ship that can't shoot back?
I just don't understand why SO many people seem to think that EVE will be horrible if they can't fly around blowing up indt... careb... mining barges and exhumers all day.
Are you really that fail at PvPing against ships that can shoot back?
Explain it to me why EVE will die if you can't get your jollies blowing up ships of people that just want to be left alone.
Do you also salt snails and pull the wings off flies for jollies?
Hey Op, here's that carebar you were talking about.
I mean, how utterly self serving can one be. I've flown expensive ships all over EVE, and had them blown out form under me when I was doing nothing more than minding my own business hacking a radar site or slavaging a mag or running a 5/10 or such in low esec etc etc. In most cases im not even pvp fit and a few of the times I got blown up it was in high sec (before I knew what to do about it, or i didn't realize the corp I wa sin at the time was wardecced).
NOT ONCE did it ever cross my mind that the other guy just playing the game was somehow the bad one. No, my 1st thought was "gee, there is something I don't quite understand, I should have learned more before trying this thing I was doing".
So I learned, and haven't lost a ship in high sec in a couple years despite multiple incidents ......like the guys who tried to gank my jump freighter last week.
Slave set plus some +6 hardwirings I get from the concord lp store in freighter pilot (even the freaking +6% noble mechanic HULL implant LOL) plus 2 alts in cheap tech 1 armor repping ships = frustrated gankers and a freighter in 20% hull :) . I do wish ccp would nerf repair bills though.
And that's the difference between me and you, and between the industrialist and the carebear. One of us (hint:me) understands the game (even the parts that negatively affect us) and accepts that for it to be a GAME their has to be negative affects and conflict. When you take away conflcit and negative stuff it stops being a game and starts being animated ************ (damn filter blocking out the word for self-pleasuring lol).
The other thinks people playing the game the way they want to (ie shooting unarmed ships) is somehow wrong....... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13243
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:06:00 -
[138] - Quote
Kane Alvo wrote:Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:The easiest solution to all issues is just mine in nullsec.
Iv always mined in nullsec, have never, ever, lost a single barge! And I have all the Veldspar I want to sell at high prices to super cap builders! Don't let Malcanis and his null bear entourage see this post. There's still trying to convince us that null industry needs a buff. Why would they be worried, seeing as how his post doesn't actually conflict with anything anyone who wants to see null buffed has said?
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Kodama Ikari
Concordiat Spaceship Samurai
29
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:21:00 -
[139] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote: She also follows the third rule of EVE - never be AFK when not docked or behind a POS shield, so her pod warps out before anyone can pop her (much cheaper) implants.
This is not the third rule of Eve, and there are a dozen good reasons to be afk while in space. More than a dozen if you're an industrialist.
The real difference between a carebear and an industrialist is that the industrialist isn't relying on that single mackinaw for a significant portion of her income. Some first-hand PI tips |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
356
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:37:00 -
[140] - Quote
Posting in a "white guy drives like this" thread. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
528
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:43:00 -
[141] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Hey Op, here's that carebar you were talking about.
.
Nice comeback, but doesn't come close to answering the question.
Why the fascination with ganking mining ships?
Freighters.. sure. Could be mass value of stuff in there. But a mining ship? What are you going to get?
Why will EVE die, if it is not easy to gank a mining ship?
|

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
356
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:43:00 -
[142] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Both the carebear and the industrialist ask, Why do you so so badly at PvP that you have to gank exhumers that can't shoot back, just to grow your epeen?
Real PvPers fight other players that are ready and looking for a fight.
Yep. Its like how Somali pirates board defenseless oil tankers, instead of taking on a US destroyer like real men. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
528
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:46:00 -
[143] - Quote
How is the OP of this thread not a rant? Why this strawmanning, pile of nothing still even open after 6 pages?
Why this fascination with killing mining ships. Why is EVE going to die if you can't spend your day blowing up mining ships? |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
530
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 18:56:00 -
[144] - Quote
Takseen wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:Both the carebear and the industrialist ask, Why do you so so badly at PvP that you have to gank exhumers that can't shoot back, just to grow your epeen?
Real PvPers fight other players that are ready and looking for a fight.
Yep. Its like how Somali pirates board defenseless oil tankers, instead of taking on a US destroyer like real men.
So, what you are saying is, that if you gt caught ganking a mining ship in high sec, you should be biomassed or banned... just like those somali pirates get killed or thrown in jail if caught?
Cool.
You know, we don't just blow up their rubber rafts, then make them go kill rats for a couple hours, and all is forgiven... right?
OP:
"Real men" keep quite when I blow up their defenseless ships that can't fight back.
"***** Willows" come on the forums and whine when I grief them.
How is that not a rant? How was this thread not locked after 1 minute? |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1234
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:02:00 -
[145] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:How is the OP of this thread not a rant? Why this strawmanning, pile of nothing still even open after 6 pages?
Why this fascination with killing mining ships. Why is EVE going to die if you can't spend your day blowing up mining ships?
You mine, you sell your minerals to Mfg. Mfg builds ship, and sells it on the market. Combatant buys ship and uses it to replace losses incurred in war/lowsec/whatever.
Miner gets blown up, combatant doesn't get his ship. Simple breaking of the logistics chain. One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
357
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:03:00 -
[146] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:Yet I see more threads on these forums from gankers than I do miners whining about having the game changed to suit them. You haven't been on the forums much, then. Just have a quick search for the bajillion GÇ£buff hulk/nerf gankingGÇ£ threads we've had.
I conducted just such a search. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=search&search=buff+hulks
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2626132#post2626132 Rubyporto complaining about ganking Mackinaws no longer being profitable
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2024883#post2024883 Jaison Savrita complaining that ganking hulks is no longer profitable
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=159275 48 page thread complaining about ganking nerf
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1755830#post1755830 Alavaria complaining about hulks being buffed
|

Dave Stark
1990
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:14:00 -
[147] - Quote
Kane Alvo wrote:Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:The easiest solution to all issues is just mine in nullsec.
Iv always mined in nullsec, have never, ever, lost a single barge! And I have all the Veldspar I want to sell at high prices to super cap builders! Don't let Malcanis and his null bear entourage see this post. There's still trying to convince us that null industry needs a buff. 
when high sec mining is more isk/hour than null sec mining, i'd say it does. Want miners to move from high sec to null sec? Then give them a reason to join player corps, and stop null sec grav sites being worth less isk/hour than high sec asteroid belts. Really isn't difficult. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
530
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:16:00 -
[148] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:How is the OP of this thread not a rant? Why this strawmanning, pile of nothing still even open after 6 pages?
Why this fascination with killing mining ships. Why is EVE going to die if you can't spend your day blowing up mining ships? You mine, you sell your minerals to Mfg. Mfg builds ship, and sells it on the market. Combatant buys ship and uses it to replace losses incurred in war/lowsec/whatever. Miner gets blown up, combatant doesn't get his ship. Simple breaking of the logistics chain.
Null maybe. High sec? You don't have NEAR enough sec status to blow on suicide ganks to make a dent in the supply chain. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
530
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:18:00 -
[149] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote: when high sec mining is more isk/hour than null sec mining, i'd say it does.
That is an issue of limited belts and the annoyance rocks in the clusters, and needs to be addressed by fixing null.. not by making it easier to gank high sec carebear miners. |

Velicitia
Arma Artificer
1234
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:31:00 -
[150] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Velicitia wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:How is the OP of this thread not a rant? Why this strawmanning, pile of nothing still even open after 6 pages?
Why this fascination with killing mining ships. Why is EVE going to die if you can't spend your day blowing up mining ships? You mine, you sell your minerals to Mfg. Mfg builds ship, and sells it on the market. Combatant buys ship and uses it to replace losses incurred in war/lowsec/whatever. Miner gets blown up, combatant doesn't get his ship. Simple breaking of the logistics chain. Null maybe. High sec? You don't have NEAR enough sec status to blow on suicide ganks to make a dent in the supply chain.
no, not the entire chain ... but on the other hand, a lot of the "big time" mfg toons buy stuff outside of standard market channels... so, killing a few macks/hulks might be just enough to kill the chain ... at least for a day or two. One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |