(...nullsec/goons stuff...)

BURN JITA 2.0: APRIL 19-21ST 2013

There are few things that we of nullsec can agree upon, but one of them is, inevitably, '**** hisec'. We will now wash away the frustrations of March's cold war by covering ourselves in the blood and suffering of the people of hisec, the weekend before Fanfest begins - just in time to remind these people who the **** we are. As before, we will invite every null entity which wants to participate in our holy cause.

Last year there was a tremendous amount of publicity about Burn Jita, leading to a whole host of hisec movements and wardecs to counter our efforts. This year we will not be making public statements about the Burn or actively trying to advertise it. Yes, we are giving approximately 19 days of notice with this post, as well as coordinating across the CFC and the HBC if they want to participate, but the blind sleeping masses of hisec will not realize something is coming until it is too late. I am eager to see what happens to hisec if we show up without three months of wardrum-beating and hype, unannounced, and commence putting everything to the sword.

The first Burn taught us a lot. We know Jita has a population cap; we know there are only so many routes into the system which are traffic controlled. We know as well that goons in Jita enjoyed not only taking out freighters, but spreading the carnage by using thrashers to take out industrials of random passers-by. A Burn is fundamentally a terror operation; it is not so much about the isk value of each freighter destroyed as it is implanting fear into the hearts and minds of even the most humble industrialist in his Badger II. This year we will be not only ganking freighters and industrials within Jita, but Miniluv will patrol the lanes outside of Jita to destroy anyone trapped on the gates from traffic control. The number of humans involved means that it will still be a complete mess, but we expect our terror-sowing to be much more efficient than last year.

(...more nullsec/goons stuff...)

Well it's Love Jita all year around otherwise so why not?

If it means a break from uninterrupted local spam bots? Hell yes.

Guess this makes it no rumour any longer when The Mittani says it.

He could have just kept it quiet and reported every thread on the topic for rumour mongering...

So if it happens, it will in effect, be a 'burn Jita crowd' versus Concord.

Nice to see null-sec folk taking part in the pve they profess to despise so much.

Ummm...99% of what most people do in nullsec is PVE.

It's not for nothing we call them "nullbears".

Wrong.


Actually, only uninformed idiots/trolls use the term "nullbear".

this is perfect example of regular goonie posts. shows why they can be easily ignored most of a time

If you don't want facts, by all means go ahead and ignore me. Doesn't make you any more in the right.

you haven't provided any facts. Only stupid assumptions (like "idiot"). And unproven opinion "99% of what most people do in nullsec is PVE = wrong".

So what do i lose ignoring you on the first place? Nothing. As i said already.

Just ignore the simple fact that ~most~ CFC members have been told to grind up their sec status by said date...

Considering nullsec is basically empty outside of fleetfights, "99% of what people do in nullsec is PVE" is absolutely an incorrect statement.

And yes, I will call anyone who unironically believes that nullsec is all about PVE, an idiot.

you're literally responding to opinions on nullsec from a hiseccer who has not and never will leave concord's loving embrace

hope this helps!

2. "incorrect stamement" - I would like to see any other reasons outside of "basically empty outside of fleetfights" which needs another proof. Let's say goonswarm alliance has 7000 members (exact number doesn't matter here). Fleetfights rarely draws more than 500-1000 people for one side and take from few to several hours. How it is possible to fleetfights to be the main job of said alliance? I guess the same can be said about any big alliance.

number of characters in any alliance anywhere != number of players in said alliance