Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
1075
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 08:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
Derpster McDerp wrote:I'v been thinkin, since all of dem fancy ol' nullseccers are complaining how high-sec should be removed, nerfed, and some other junk I don't really care about, why don't we go burn null sector 4040fploppolo-303-hurp-derp since dey burned Jita last year. It'll only be fair since dey shot dat big monument thingy and kill some people in protest and stuff last year. We should strike back and shoot some of der asteriods with our mining barges and teach those darn null sec people a lesson.
I am for serious.
as far i know only a few of those dem nullseccers want to see hs nerfed to death , the people that cry the hardest to nerf hs are hsseccers who only want easy targets to measure their epeen with but other wise avoid ls and 0 s as the plague because people actually shoot back there I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |
Gnoshia
State War Academy Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 08:41:00 -
[62] - Quote
Andski wrote:Derpster McDerp wrote:why don't we go burn null sector 4040fploppolo-303-hurp-derp since dey burned Jita last year please, please do this consider EC-P8R, it's directly connected to hisec!
This. |
Lord Zim
2327
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 08:45:00 -
[63] - Quote
As far as I know, the only reason anyone in nullsec can be construed as "want to see hs nerfed to death" is when the definition of "to death" actually means "tweaked slightly", because any nerf to anything that might concern them is a huge disaster which will kill the game. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8455
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 08:47:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:As far as I know, the only reason anyone in nullsec can be construed as "want to see hs nerfed to death" is when the definition of "to death" actually means "tweaked slightly", because any nerf to anything that might concern them is a huge disaster which will kill the game.
WELL IF PEOPLE AREN'T FORCED INTO HI-SEC THEN HI-SEC WILL DIE!!!!!1111 Vote for Malcanis for CSM8: Read about my platform here
Please endorse my candidacy here |
Frying Doom
2136
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 08:49:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:As far as I know, the only reason anyone in nullsec can be construed as "want to see hs nerfed to death" is when the definition of "to death" actually means "tweaked slightly", because any nerf to anything that might concern them is a huge disaster which will kill the game. Slight scratch or complete Armageddon, whats the difference? Both obviously mean death to Hi-sec, same as if Null is boosted.
My recommendations are:-á 1.James Arget 2.Ayeson 3.Nathan Jameson 4.Cipreh 5.Chitsa Jason 6. Malcanis 7. Mike Azariah 8. Ripard Teg 9. Mangala Solaris 10. Ali Aras |
baltec1
Bat Country
5804
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 09:37:00 -
[66] - Quote
Come to VFK. |
Ra'Shyne Viper
Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
65
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 12:30:00 -
[67] - Quote
EC-P8R contact me when ur ready to (burn) us DUST 514 player
Ingame name: Vin Vicious |
Caldari Citizen 1897289768188
State War Academy Caldari State
182
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 13:56:00 -
[68] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:A southern troll.
Southern? You sir have obviously never been south. Probably never even seen a gravy biscuit. |
Raven Solaris
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 15:00:00 -
[69] - Quote
You know if you really want to **** off nullseccers, going there to fight isn't the way to do it, that's what they want.
What you want to do is sneak into their upgraded systems, kill all but 1 rat (a frigate or something) in every belt, strip mine the belts, clear all their anomalies and signatures, and then just leave. |
Lord Zim
2331
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 15:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
Please do. Make sure to faction fit the ships, too. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
|
March rabbit
No Name No Pain
611
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 15:09:00 -
[71] - Quote
posting in 0.0-seccers thread "pay attention to us!!! waaaa, waaaa!" |
Amyclas Amatin
The Phantom Regiment THE ROYAL NAVY
96
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 15:22:00 -
[72] - Quote
Could I get some carebears or even nullbears to do a survey on high-sec aggression? I'm hoping to get as varied a response as possible.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dLcM27c_qDyOIxFgE4Zan_T8j_eZDDeCUAEL4lwXGC8/viewform The post that got me banned from Eve-Uni: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=210049&find=unread |
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 15:39:00 -
[73] - Quote
Raven Solaris wrote:What you want to do is sneak into their upgraded systems, kill all but 1 rat (a frigate or something) in every belt, strip mine the belts, clear all their anomalies and signatures, and then just leave.
Wouldn't work. PvPers tend to be too lazy to bother. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|
Miranda Ctan
Aliastra Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 16:11:00 -
[74] - Quote
Burn VFK. 4/19/2013
It'll be great, nothing can go wrong. |
Dring Dingle
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 16:17:00 -
[75] - Quote
DON'T FEEED THE TROLLLS |
Onomerous
Shockwave Innovations Shockwave Sovereign Industries
58
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 19:15:00 -
[76] - Quote
Dring Dingle wrote:DON'T FEEED THE TROLLLS
This... |
Derpster McDerp
Lithium Light Expoit This Mf's
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
you guys probably took this to seriously. |
SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1520
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:32:00 -
[78] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Come to VFK.
This is probably the only thing that would get me to leave delve.
(Or log in again) |
Corey Fumimasa
Kiith Paktu Curatores Veritatis Alliance
247
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:42:00 -
[79] - Quote
Derpster McDerp wrote:you guys probably took this to seriously.
Its a serious issue even if you are a troll. Funny how that works, I guess that makes you kind of funny.
Highsec has vast wealth and skill. The guys who log on to do missions have toons that PvPers dream about; max tank, guns, nav, and drones. If they take the time to figure out PvP and get organized they will destroy the null sec blocs.
This of course wont happen, but it could, and the highsec players can be proud of that.
Is the loss of 50 or 100 ships really that much of a worry? Bring them in, cheap ones are fine, hell, over tanked procurers will teach you a lot about camps and pvp. And covops or even mwd/cloak ships are very hard to catch once you figure that out. So what if you loose 5 or 10 learning.
Once you can move around in null and low you can shut down ratting income just by being AFK cloaked in a system. And if you do manage to kill a ratter x-mas tree ship and loot it you will have more than paid for your learning losses.
Getting blown up doesn't mean you lost if it leads to you eventually destroying the bastards in null.
*Yes I camp gates in null and would love to catch a cloaky ship that doesn't know how to fight. But keep in mind I am broke and fly very cheap ships because 50% of the time the people I catch are cyno scouts.
Corebloodbrothers for CSM: Ring mining & bottom up income, new player balanced doctrines, NRDS
|
Lord Zim
2333
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:43:00 -
[80] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:If they take the time to figure out PvP and get organized they will destroy the null sec blocs. And, this'll never happen. Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
|
SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1522
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:47:00 -
[81] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:
Highsec has vast wealth and skill. The guys who log on to do missions have toons that PvPers dream about; max tank, guns, nav, and drones. If they take the time to figure out PvP and get organized they will destroy the null sec blocs.
Well they could probably destroy CVA. But I daresay a fairly large number of us have perfect tank, guns, nav, and drones, and since the fleet doctrines change from FOTM month to month, many of us can reship to something that better suits the current objective. And since we're defending our space, we could do it quickly. We won't even get into the fact that there is next to 0 chance that anyone but us would ever have a cap on field once all the jammers went up. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7346
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:52:00 -
[82] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Highsec has vast wealth and skill. The guys who log on to do missions have toons that PvPers dream about; max tank, guns, nav, and drones. If they take the time to figure out PvP and get organized they will destroy the null sec blocs.
ahahaha no they won't
basically any current bloc would outnumber them anyway with people whose characters have "max tank, guns, nav and drones" and we'd have a decisive advantage in capitals and supercapitals to begin with
I mean I'm sure the eve equivalent of a peasant revolt is an existential threat to the providence bloc but it isn't to the rest of us because the lords have always had better training, better equipment and better experience ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13454
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:52:00 -
[83] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:Highsec has vast wealth and skill. The guys who log on to do missions have toons that PvPers dream about; max tank, guns, nav, and drones. So not very well-rounded, then, and shock-full of weaknesses to exploit. Yeah, PvPers do indeed dream of finding such excellent targets.
Quote:Is the loss of 50 or 100 ships really that much of a worry? For people who can only ever think in terms of ISK/h, it sure does. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
Lord Zim
2333
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 22:54:00 -
[84] - Quote
Corey Fumimasa wrote:hell, over tanked procurers will teach you a lot about camps and pvp. Also what the christ is this? Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7348
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
i dunno but he considers organized mission runners a threat
it's not like it's amazingly distant considering that mission runners are asocial players to begin with, they are risk-averse as hell, they refuse to go under somebody else's command, preferring to "do their own thing" and, most importantly, will refuse to fly what they are asked to fly "because see i could fly a maelstrom with t2 guns and everything but this torp raven here does more dps"
so once somebody manages to get a bunch of mission runners together and convince them to play with other players, accept the inherent risks of pvp, listen to an FC and fly certain ships then they might pose enough of a threat to a small tower somewhere ~*a proud belligerent undesirable*~ TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1983
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:08:00 -
[86] - Quote
Fleet coherence and synergy are extremely important to battlefield success.... Just calling for numbers isn't enough... you need to organize them... and organizing most highsec residents is akin to herding cats.
Have you ever attended a live event? -- You get 5-25 CCP employess... -- You get 20-200 random, disorganized players showing up and twiddling their thumbs while trying to decide whom to shoot... -- Then you get a 60 man Nullsec fleet that comes in, destroys everything.. and loots the field.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
13456
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:09:00 -
[87] - Quote
Andski wrote:so once somebody manages to get a bunch of mission runners together and convince them to play with other players, accept the inherent risks of pvp, listen to an FC and fly certain ships then they might pose enough of a threat to a small tower somewhere You're being very unfair now.
Do you have any idea how much ewar a small tower can sport? Now compare that to how much the MRs will be able to bring with their GÇ£perfect skillsGÇ¥.
Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |
SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1522
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:25:00 -
[88] - Quote
If nothing else watching them learn about bubble mechanics for the first time could be entertaining. I'd drop a mobile medium 70km on a drag in line with every outgate all the way to VFK and just bomb them to death with 20 guys. |
Lord Zim
2335
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 23:26:00 -
[89] - Quote
Filthy nullbear blobber. :colbert: Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home. RIP Vile Rat |
Corey Fumimasa
Kiith Paktu Curatores Veritatis Alliance
247
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 00:09:00 -
[90] - Quote
Andski wrote:Corey Fumimasa wrote:Highsec has vast wealth and skill. The guys who log on to do missions have toons that PvPers dream about; max tank, guns, nav, and drones. If they take the time to figure out PvP and get organized they will destroy the null sec blocs.
ahahaha no they won't basically any current bloc would outnumber them anyway with people whose characters have "max tank, guns, nav and drones" and we'd have a decisive advantage in capitals and supercapitals to begin with I mean I'm sure the eve equivalent of a peasant revolt is an existential threat to the providence bloc but it isn't to the rest of us because the lords have always had better training, better equipment and better experience than the peasants
Then why is there so much talk from the big null blocks about NPC corps and high sec industry and yet no action? Highsec has towers all through it and none of them are owned by NPC corps. Highsec industry slots are as available to you as they are to a highsec bear. And highsec mission runners are very susceptible to suicide gankers.
The truth is that you are out numbered and out gunned and impotent to do anything about it. Corebloodbrothers for CSM: Ring mining & bottom up income, new player balanced doctrines, NRDS
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |