| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Igor Slovensky
get outa dodge corp
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 01:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
The latest proposed industry changes in the new expansion appear once more to try and encourage a greater player presence in low and null sec areas of the eve universe.
That will not happen, not now, not ever. The reason should be obvious, it is not in the nature of a high sec player to even consider low or null sec as a viable opportunity. Nor is it in the nature of a low or null sec pvp player to suddenly want to become an industrialist.
As CCP continues to make high sec less profitable and less attractive to players, it will never have the desired effect of forcing players to low and null sec , but it may have the effect of having players vote with their credit cards by finding another game that suits their playing style and nature.
One thing I have long admired about the eve universe is that it has always attempted to maintain a balance for all types of playing styles, including a place for solo players and small industrial corporation players in high sec space. After reading the developer blogs on the new expansion I get the feeling that this desire to maintain balance has come to an end.
One area that has come under attack is ice mining. Listed below are some excerpts from CCP FozzieGÇÖs developer blog. ( link: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/resource-shakeup-blog/ )
GÇ£By CCP Fozzie
At our current numbers, the maximum supply of ice from highsec (assuming that each belt is mined out completely five times a day) would provide approximately 80% of the game's ice needs, ensuring that at least some of the ice mining must be undertaken in lower security space.
Combined, these changes are designed to make ice harvesting a valuable activity that players will engage in both cooperative and competitive gameplay to benefit from.
We at CCP want ice harvesting to be a lucrative activity that encourages players to relocate and compete for a piece of the pie. GÇ£
Clearly CCP is out to discourage solo play and encourage players to move to either move to null and low sec, or work with combat groups while mining with these changes. Unfortunately, just as the many attempts before it this one is doomed to failure also. I fear the only result this will have is driving up the costs of POS fuels and result in the shut down of small corporation high sec POSGÇÖs. What the players in those corporations will do once the life blood of their corporation is off- lined is unknown, but rushing off to null sec will NOT be one of the options they will even consider.
It is past time for CCP to understand that those wishing to be in null and low sec are already there, and nothing can be done to force those not wishing to be there to change their minds.
Flame on GǪGǪGǪ.
|

Haulie Berry
519
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 01:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP: Hey guys, we're going to make ice scarcer, which will make ice mining more valuable.
Standard issue mining moron: Y U HATE HI SEC?  |

Isonda
suspended animations DOT None Of The Above
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 01:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
OP: can I have your stuff since you are leaving? |

Warriors Fury
Fury and Love
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 02:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
I personally think that the changes they are making in the coming patch is great . Eve was always meant to be a game where the end content is in 0.0 . As it is ,I believe there is too many people living a safe life in empire anyway. I think that the changes thy are making are the right changes not to "force", People out of empire , but by adjusting the mineral contents and station slots of outposts it really opens up the bottleneck that has held back major industry in 0.0 . This means a lot to me since I have recently started a new corporation (prior to learning of the changes ) aimed at massive 0.0 industrialism , I am a huge fan of the changes to the game .
You can of course continue carebearing in empire if you want to , that of course is your freedom of choice within the wonderful world of eve . But I for one absolutely love the changes they are making , and the awesome 0.0 oppurtunities that it will open up for my corporation , and my future alliance and 0.0 industrialism . |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
909
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 02:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Most people that don't like the new patch haven't ever really experienced industry in nullsec.
The patch will be good for the game and make null more bearable for industrialists. The only thing I don't like is the new scanner that will allow quick scanning of grav sites. That's not really ok with me. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

DeLindsay
Galaxies Fall
35
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 02:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Like it or not, the OP isn't wrong. CCP is, at least in some way, forcing/encouraging players to move from their carebear lives in Highsec with an attempt to populate Low/Null with this change. They already "tried" it with DeD 1/2's and it negatively effected Faction Warfare, exactly like players said it would. Incursions are not solo'able in any way. Although this adds a great dynamic "group" content, there are MANY subs that just want to play in the Eve sandbox as if it's their own personal empire building game, and are happy to do so, unless they can no longer be happy doing so.
I could care less what CCP changes as I will adapt. If they remove X from the area I call my home, then I will just go play with Y. Since there are so many things to do in Eve it makes it easy for an older toon like myself to just go on a different path for a while. The newer players (1-3 yrs) that are skewed to a specific play style will feel jaded and could possible un-sub which is the last thing any company wants. Of course you can think of it this way. With less carebears in Highsec, who will gankers have to prey on? There is a HUGE "industry" in Highsec pirating that also could be negatively effected by the change, or any change that tries to move more of the player base into Low/Null.
Check out my post about some Drone lovin: Proposed Drone Improvement |

Haulie Berry
520
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 02:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:Most people that don't like the new patch haven't ever really experienced industry in nullsec.
The patch will be good for the game and make null more bearable for industrialists. The only thing I don't like is the new scanner that will allow quick scanning of grav sites. That's not really ok with me.
Dude. That's the very best part. |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
909
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:Zifrian wrote:Most people that don't like the new patch haven't ever really experienced industry in nullsec.
The patch will be good for the game and make null more bearable for industrialists. The only thing I don't like is the new scanner that will allow quick scanning of grav sites. That's not really ok with me. Dude. That's the very best part. If they did something about 23/7 cloak camping sure. But I don't like the fact you can train up some newbie with a cyno and easily warp to grav sites with just the ship scanner to hot drop me. Right now you need to scan down the belt, giving a bit of breathing room. We'll see I guess. Maybe it won't be as big as an issue as I think. Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

zaminia
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Zifrian wrote: The only thing I don't like is the new scanner that will allow quick scanning of grav sites. That's not really ok with me.
I have to agree.
Many players have actually spent time training scanning skills to get an 'edge' when scanning down grav sites and the like.
It appears that time was wasted as the new patch has nerfed scanning. |

Eric Raeder
No Fee Too High
29
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
Some ice mining will probably move from high to null or possibly even low, but it is not at all clear the price of ice products will go up. Ice miner cycle times are being cut in half, which means once an ice field is found the ice can be gathered a lot more quickly. It's quite possible ice prices will drop in the long run. |

Haulie Berry
520
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
zaminia wrote:Zifrian wrote: The only thing I don't like is the new scanner that will allow quick scanning of grav sites. That's not really ok with me. I have to agree. Many players have actually spent time training scanning skills to get an 'edge' when scanning down grav sites and the like. It appears that time was wasted as the new patch has nerfed scanning.
....nerfed scanning? The mere thought of never getting a sig to 25% just to find out it was a gravimetric makes me want to go spend some alone time with a high-res picture of Soundwave and a bottle of Jergens. |

Haulie Berry
520
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Eric Raeder wrote:Some ice mining will probably move from high to null or possibly even low, but it is not at all clear the price of ice products will go up. Ice miner cycle times are being cut in half, which means once an ice field is found the ice can be gathered a lot more quickly. It's quite possible ice prices will drop in the long run.
This would only be true if, once an ice field is found, it wouldn't run out of ice. They've made it very clear that the new ice belts will run out of ice. Doesn't matter how fast you can harvest it, the supply is going from an effectively infinite amount (four belts - one of each - could supply the entire ice-product needs of the game right now) to less. Without a massive uptake of low/null WH mining or a massive drop off in consumption, the price is going up (at least from, say, the pre-speculation price of two weeks ago). |

Fhaerbaline Khent
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 03:49:00 -
[13] - Quote
I think CCP went about it pretty wisely.
Excellent boost to Low / 0.0 way of life without shaking up highsec too much.
With regards to the Ice-Babies crying frozen tears......You have 'till early June to hustle static ice....Better get moving. |

Arcturus Trask
Vindicator Corporation Strategic Alliance
205
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 05:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
There are many positive aspects to the new changes. Any negatives for me are about the unknown effects. I am old and at times do not like change. I can't count the number of times that I got pissed over some change that ended up being actually rather cool in the long run.
Things that will be interesting for me... The time for endless ice mining has come at last. Except for AFK/Bot miners, this should not be too much of a problem. It is my hope that when a new Ice Field spawns that my Alliance fleet of miners can not kill it in 15 minutes. I hope that a bunch of us can kill it in 3 to 4 hours then D-Scan the next location. Twice the ice and half the time. We would not have to mine ice that often to keep our POS towers up.
As for high Sec Gankers, I do not see any reason for them to change. The extra 4 seconds it will take to find an ice belt over knowing where the static belt was should not slow them down. Tank up your miners as much as you can, watch local for sudden jumps in populations or Destroyer fleets and it is business as usual. When in doubt about local activity, warp out...
I am miffed about all the time I have spent in training my scanning to the max just so I can scan down a Gravimetric site in less than a minute. I just wish they added a new type of signature that I could look for with my kick ass scanning skillz. Now a 1 day wonder can press the scan button and jump to the Ice Field? *sigh* In that I feel cheated. :)
As to adding additional Trit and Pyrite to the low/nul sec ores will sure help us mine and build without the need for High Sec trips. The more you can do behind your Blue wall the better.
But prices will fall? Remember when you could buy a Rhea for about 2 Billion ISK? That was only a few years ago. Now they are over 7 billion. But prices will go up? Something's will go up and down for a while until we re-develop a stable economy. It will be interesting to see how that works out.
Forcing people to move to low and null.... Yes, I do see this as another CCP push to make low and null more profitable to work in. People who wish to stay in High Sec will just have to adapt to the changes and develop a support group of like minded Corps to help protect each other. I am not saying they need to make an Alliance which a lot of them wish to avoid, but develop relationships to help support each others efforts.
Those brave souls who have never stepped into low and null should try to find a stable Alliance in low and or null and change your way of game play to match those you wish to join. Take only what you need to low and null to get started. Ask the Alliance which PVP ships they recommend and the proper fittings and join in the PVP when required. The rest of the time do what you always do... Mine away, watch local, set up a proper D-Scan and keep a constant eye out. When in doubt, warp out.
CCP will be successful in moving some more players to Low and Null with this patch. There will be player who will stay in HS no matter what and adapt. I am sure there will be a lot of rage quits which will last from a few days to a few weeks before they re-sub. (EVE = Addiction) I bet that will be some who will rage quit and never come back. EvE was not in their blood I guess.
There have been more interesting patches, but I do not see my fleet in Jita blasting any Monuments over this... I am honestly looking forward to the first month after the patch. There will be adjustment.... there are always adjustments.
Fly safe my friends. It is going to be an interesting summer.
-Arc CEO VIndicator Corp
|

DeLindsay
Galaxies Fall
35
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 05:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
I just thought of a LOL side effect to the new Ice anoms. They will be a ganker paradise as most will be fitting their Macks for max yield (min tank) to race and get as much out of the 'belt' as possible before it's depleted. I can hear the screams now as so many carebears nerd rage in local and flame on the forums that CCP is being unfair to miners :P
Quote:I am miffed about all the time I have spent in training my scanning to the max just so I can scan down a Gravimetric site in less than a minute. I just wish they added a new type of signature that I could look for with my kick ass scanning skillz. Now a 1 day wonder can press the scan button and jump to the Ice Field? *sigh* In that I feel cheated. :)
Agreed brother. Also it will make those slightly better 'hidden' belts in Highsec (which have slightly better ore types) pointless as anyone can find them after the change. Check out my post about some Drone lovin: Proposed Drone Improvement |

Carina Lynn
Titanic Solutions Strategic Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 05:48:00 -
[16] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote: ....nerfed scanning? The mere thought of never getting a sig to 25% just to find out it was a gravimetric makes me want to go spend some alone time with a high-res picture of Soundwave and a bottle of Jergens.
Oh hun! I loved that one!!! Serious case of the giggles.
Here is the Pic... I am off to Jita to buy some lube.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u6iJTzeyPSk/TuvJppGEnBI/AAAAAAAAAbs/9vcgrN_azwg/s200/ccp_soundwave.jpg
|

Skorpynekomimi
499
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 07:51:00 -
[17] - Quote
Rabble rabble rabble.
It's not forcing people to populate low and null. You can still ore mine just as well, there'll just be less market for nullsec types coming to get their trit. This could collapse the 425mm railgun market, but not too much else. Ice? It's still there. Just gotta look for it, and GET UP EARLY TO FIND IT. Shocking.
Don't want to time it? Go mine it in lowsec. **** |

Beckie DeLey
Hyperfleet Industries xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
449
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:03:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ice prices on the rise; ice miners furious. I would like to remind you that littering is a crime punishable with death, and that disagreeing with me will be considered verbal littering. |

Dave Stark
2919
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
Igor Slovensky wrote:Clearly CCP is out to discourage solo play and encourage players to move to either move to null and low sec, or work with combat groups while mining with these changes. Unfortunately, just as the many attempts before it this one is doomed to failure also. I fear the only result this will have is driving up the costs of POS fuels and result in the shut down of small corporation high sec POSGÇÖs. What the players in those corporations will do once the life blood of their corporation is off- lined is unknown, but rushing off to null sec will NOT be one of the options they will even consider.
It is past time for CCP to understand that those wishing to be in null and low sec are already there, and nothing can be done to force those not wishing to be there to change their minds.
Flame on GǪGǪGǪ.
you don't have to move to null or low. there's no reason to work with combat groups mining with these changes.
are you completely stupid or just trolling? i hope you're trolling because my faith in humanity is already stretched pretty thin |

xPredat0rz
Grey Templars Fidelas Constans
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:23:00 -
[20] - Quote
You dont have to move out here to make isk. Hell I know more then a few null sec miners that plex 20 accounts mining in null. It is possible to make a metric **** ton of isk doing it.
Then again generally before you start you need to scan down wormhole exits in system and bubble the **** out of them or crash them and **** cage the gates...Even then its not perfectly safe.
On the same token you can mine in high sec, in "safe systems" and die to the thrashers and catylsts for less isk/hour.
I could say the same when it comes to missions vs Anomolies and DED sites for isk/hour.
No one is making you go anywhere. They are just rewarding those that step outside of the safety box with more ways to make isk. |

Oliver G
G Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 08:58:00 -
[21] - Quote
I totally agree with the OP. CCP has made many attempts to populate low/null. All the people who want to be there are already there.
I also see the problem that the upcomming changes do not leave room for small high sec corporations to run a POS. Limiting the ICE supply is ok, but I think they overdid it. I just checked: Khanid Kingdom will not have asingle ICE anomaly in the whole region (!).
This is not limiting the ICE supply, this is completely removing the ICE supply. Why? Does CCP really want to ban POSes from high-sec in Khanid? |

xPredat0rz
Grey Templars Fidelas Constans
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:06:00 -
[22] - Quote
Amarr has the largest stretch of space. Khanid Kingdom is also amarr.
You will have Ice within 5 jumps of the Khanid Region
Moutid in Tash Murkon
Kothe in Kador
Its not like it wont be availible. More then half of Khanid is low sec. So do some ninja low sec ops if you have to
Quote:Ice HarvestingAs mentioned in the main blog, we are planning to make significant changes to ice harvesting, moving supply from static belts into respawning anomalies, as well as doubling the speed of ice harvesters to increase yield over time.
Most systems that currently have ice belts will contain these new ice anomalies, with the notable exception of many systems in Amarrian, Khanid, and Ammatar high security space. Below I will list all the systems in high security space that will contain spawns of Clear Icicle.
Afivad, Agal, Avada, Bashakru, Chanoun, Dantan, Dihra, Erkinen, Esteban, Gamis, Gelhan, Gosalav, Jarzalad, Jerma, Kothe, Manatirid, Miah, Moutid, Ordion, Raravoss, Riavayed, Seil, Talidal, Warouh.
These will be the only high security systems that will contain Clear Icicle. All low-security and null-security systems that currently contain static ice belts, as well as all high security systems in Caldari, Gallente and Minmatar space that contain static ice belts, will contain the new ice anomalies.
|

Dave Stark
2919
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:08:00 -
[23] - Quote
Oliver G wrote:All the people who want to be there are already there.
incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there.
there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
Suck it up, OP. I don't think CCP is daft enough to think that someone like you will go to low or null. After all, they are truly scary places.
Maybe they think the high sec alts of null and low players will go there for industry. That would be a good enough start. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Oliver G
G Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
OK, so tons of ice available in low sec. Will it make me go to low? No. Why? Too much trouble. EVE is supposed to be a game. Nowe everytime I need ice for the POS it becomes a damn project to get it. I do not want to waste 3 hours in a row to grab ICE. So it is as the OP says, some people will adapt in high-sec. I am one of them.
Quote:incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there.
there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently.
And do you have the feeling that this is about to change? |

Kado Nolens
2Fux Consortium
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
I like all the changes except that Grav sites are now found by using the ship scanner the same as Anom's....
Seems very one sided and might as well go back to just hitting belts instead..... as anoms are the first to get hit in a small system... |

Dave Stark
2919
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:17:00 -
[27] - Quote
Oliver G wrote:OK, so tons of ice available in low sec. Will it make me go to low? No. Why? Too much trouble. EVE is supposed to be a game. Nowe everytime I need ice for the POS it becomes a damn project to get it. I do not want to waste 3 hours in a row to grab ICE. So it is as the OP says, some people will adapt in high-sec. I am one of them. Quote:incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there.
there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. And do you have the feeling that this is about to change?
yes. you will make more isk mining in null than you will in high sec after odyssey. |

Dave Stark
2919
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:19:00 -
[28] - Quote
Kado Nolens wrote:I like all the changes except that Grav sites are now found by using the ship scanner the same as Anom's....
Seems very one sided and might as well go back to just hitting belts instead..... as anoms are the first to get hit in a small system...
it's even worse for wormholes. you won't know some one is near you until they appear on grid. no local, no probes on dscan, just an uncloaking arazu pointing you.
wormhole miners do have my sympathy, but looking at the graphs nobody mines in wormholes anyway. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
42
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Oliver G wrote:OK, so tons of ice available in low sec. Will it make me go to low? No. Why? Too much trouble. EVE is supposed to be a game. Nowe everytime I need ice for the POS it becomes a damn project to get it. I do not want to waste 3 hours in a row to grab ICE. So it is as the OP says, some people will adapt in high-sec. I am one of them. Quote:incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there.
there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. And do you have the feeling that this is about to change? yes. you will make more isk mining in null than you will in high sec after odyssey.
And with the outpost changes you even have some chance of doing something useful with the minerals. Nowhere near far enough yet but in the right direction. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Dave Stark
2919
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 09:52:00 -
[30] - Quote
Zappity wrote:And with the outpost changes you even have some chance of doing something useful with the minerals. Nowhere near far enough yet but in the right direction.
indeed, there will be a local market for the minerals. you'll still be sending a portion of them to jita, unless other people like importing 425mm railguns... still, it'll be better than the system we have now. |

Oliver G
G Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:05:00 -
[31] - Quote
Well, it looks like we will have to wait and see how it really works out in the end. Maybe, it is still bearable to do the long range trip to get the ice.
Regarding the Outpost modifications, I cannot really say whats going on here because I have never dealt with outposts. But I trust you guys know what you are talking about.  |

Atlantis Fuanan
Uncharted Skies Cerberus Unleashed
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
I for my part, am not directly involved by this expansion change. But furthermore i really hope that this will cause the global playerbase and espacially the HiSec to move into lower Security spaces. The Playerbase should also "balance" itself into the 3 space regions, not just 70%+ HiSec and rest is creeping around in the darker space. |

xPredat0rz
Grey Templars Fidelas Constans
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:08:00 -
[33] - Quote
Oliver G wrote:Well, it looks like we will have to wait and see how it really works out in the end. Maybe, it is still bearable to do the long range trip to get the ice. Regarding the Outpost modifications, I cannot really say whats going on here because I have never dealt with outposts. But I trust you guys know what you are talking about. 
Basically you need 1 of each outpost in your constellation, or if you own the region 1 reprocessing one centrally located with jb.
Genreally though you get better refining compressing it and shipping it to high sec. One of the reason most alliance never see mineral taxes.
If your not willing to move 3-4 freighters worth of upgrades per station your better off not bothering with keeping the minerals/ ice in null |

Oliver G
G Enterprises
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 10:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
xPredat0rz wrote:Oliver G wrote:Well, it looks like we will have to wait and see how it really works out in the end. Maybe, it is still bearable to do the long range trip to get the ice. Regarding the Outpost modifications, I cannot really say whats going on here because I have never dealt with outposts. But I trust you guys know what you are talking about.  Basically you need 1 of each outpost in your constellation, or if you own the region 1 reprocessing one centrally located with jb. Genreally though you get better refining compressing it and shipping it to high sec. One of the reason most alliance never see mineral taxes. If your not willing to move 3-4 freighters worth of upgrades per station your better off not bothering with keeping the minerals/ ice in null
This kind of makes me wonder what the benefit of having an outpost then really is. I was always under the impression that outposts are like high-sec stations but owned by the playerbase. Looks like I was wrong (as I said, I never dealt with outposts). |

Zifrian
Licentia Ex Vereor Black Core Alliance
910
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 11:12:00 -
[35] - Quote
Oliver G wrote:xPredat0rz wrote:Oliver G wrote:Well, it looks like we will have to wait and see how it really works out in the end. Maybe, it is still bearable to do the long range trip to get the ice. Regarding the Outpost modifications, I cannot really say whats going on here because I have never dealt with outposts. But I trust you guys know what you are talking about.  Basically you need 1 of each outpost in your constellation, or if you own the region 1 reprocessing one centrally located with jb. Genreally though you get better refining compressing it and shipping it to high sec. One of the reason most alliance never see mineral taxes. If your not willing to move 3-4 freighters worth of upgrades per station your better off not bothering with keeping the minerals/ ice in null This kind of makes me wonder what the benefit of having an outpost then really is. I was always under the impression that outposts are like high-sec stations but owned by the playerbase. Looks like I was wrong (as I said, I never dealt with outposts). Each type of station has a role and gives you basic access to certain functions. Amarr is manufacturing, Caldari research, Minmatar refining, Gallente offices. Here's a basic rundown: http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/outpost_construction.php
So basically, because you can't set up two stations in the same system, you have to figure out what type to put and where. The Minmatar station gives you 35% refining efficiency and only after installing billion isk upgrades can you get them to 40 and 50%. Not to mention the corp that owns it usually puts on a tax (wouldn't you?) that you can't get around. So basically for refining, you need to get scrapmetal processing and refining up to 4, have a 40% refine station and use a refining implant to get "perfect" refine. Then you lose up to 10% to the owner corp.
So now I have my minerals, where do I build my stuff? Hrm, no pos with manufacturing...I go to the nearest Amarr station. That's a few jumps away. Do I have access to the production lines (there are only 20!). Yes, 1 line open. I can make my Maelstrom to sell....now am I in a trade hub for the area? Ooops, nope! Need to ship that thing to the staging station to sell. Freighter in nullsec? Um...what about a jump bridge? Well that's a lot of ozone. Well, let me use my carrier to jump my ship there to sell. Not a lot of isotopes but I can handle it. Ok, put it on market and done.
Well crap, we are low on ice materials. And since we are 3 cynos from highsec, I guess it's time to rally up the corp to go ice mine for a few 6 hours so we can run our jump bridges, pos's, and cynos for the next month. Where's that ice system? Crap, how many jumps? Guys, I can only fit so many hulks in my rorq...can someone else jump their ships? Do we have someone who can boost or pick up cans? I can't do both. Who's our security? Gah, that's far from the refinery station...guess I need to bring some heavy water with me so I can compress....woah, those are some long compression times... 
Whew, ok, ice mining done. Well now that I've done that maybe I should try to make some T2 modules that everyone uses. Wait, I have to import all the data cores from high sec as well as most of the T2 moon parts because our alliance doesn't control the right space for the base moon mats I need? Oh wait, I have to do how many reactions to get moon materials for a single item of T2? WTF?
Ah well, lets do some capital production.....I need how much Tritanium?!?!
I could go on but I have little sympathy for people complaining about fixes to null and "nerfing highsec". Especially when the changes are so small overall. Null needs a lot more love on the Science and Industry front.
Maximze your Industry Potential! - Get EVE Isk per Hour! |

Oliver G
G Enterprises
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 11:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:tons of stuff
Well, thank you very much for your elaborate answer. Reading this gave me a pretty good picture on how the situation is. And yes, I can feel your pain.  |

Reuben Johnson
Gal-Min Industries
71
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 11:46:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ive argued before that to improve Null, you need to improve Null, not nerf Hi. And this is what CCP has done. There is no Hi Sec nerf, no one is being forced anywhere. All they did is loosen the Null bottleneck for those already in Null. The vast majority of minerals will still come from Hi.
Industrialists (miners in particualr) and PvPer's dont mix. It's the Hippo giving the Scorpion a ride...sooner or later the Scorpion will sting the Hippo, just as PvPer's will eventually get bored and shoot the miners their supposed to protect, and everyone knows this.
Sov holders don't have the forsight, o likely even the tools, to see themselves as a nation, providing a safe haven for indutrialists to gather to ply their trade to advance the "nation". To them, everyone is a target. Until they either see past that, or Eve gives them the tools to implement it, Hi seccers will stay in Hi, and the large majority of minerals will still flow from Hi to Null, only those already giving it a go in Null will benefit from thsi change, with very few getting hurt. If youre getting hurt from this change, you werent on very sound ground to begin with. |

Caldari 5
The Element Syndicate
59
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 12:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
Arcturus Trask wrote:Things that will be interesting for me... The time for endless ice mining has come at last. Except for AFK/Bot miners, this should not be too much of a problem. It is my hope that when a new Ice Field spawns that my Alliance fleet of miners can not kill it in 15 minutes. I hope that a bunch of us can kill it in 3 to 4 hours then D-Scan the next location. Twice the ice and half the time. We would not have to mine ice that often to keep our POS towers up. Um I'm not sure if I heard the Presentation correctly, however I believe that the next Ice Anom Spawn is 4hours from the time it is depleted, not 4hours from the time it was started, which means that you can't chain them, and if you happen to login at the wrong time you could be twiddling your thumbs for upto 4 hours waiting for the next spawn.
Arcturus Trask wrote:I am miffed about all the time I have spent in training my scanning to the max just so I can scan down a Gravimetric site in less than a minute. I just wish they added a new type of signature that I could look for with my kick ass scanning skillz. Now a 1 day wonder can press the scan button and jump to the Ice Field? *sigh* In that I feel cheated. :) Yes, I'm a tad pissed at the Grav Sites being moved to Anoms, I would have preferred static belts moved to Anoms and the normal Grav sites left to scan down for the people that want to go the extra yard to get something decent. |

Asuna Bourne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 14:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
Im a newer player and Im not too familiar with Gravs and Anoms.
But I read about them and I trained to scan them down and mine.
Now they will always have folks in them because they no longer need to be scanned down.
That sucks. I had to waste time training skills to do this. Had I known about this, I never would have trained those skills. |

Haulie Berry
532
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
Asuna Bourne wrote:Im a newer player and Im not too familiar with Gravs and Anoms.
But I read about them and I trained to scan them down and mine.
Now they will always have folks in them because they no longer need to be scanned down.
That sucks. I had to waste time training skills to do this. Had I known about this, I never would have trained those skills.
...this entire expansion is themed around doing new and exciting things with those exact skills, and you're crying about how you won't need them to find a field to hoe anymore.  |

Asuna Bourne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:19:00 -
[41] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:Asuna Bourne wrote:Im a newer player and Im not too familiar with Gravs and Anoms.
But I read about them and I trained to scan them down and mine.
Now they will always have folks in them because they no longer need to be scanned down.
That sucks. I had to waste time training skills to do this. Had I known about this, I never would have trained those skills. ...this entire expansion is themed around doing new and exciting things with those exact skills, and you're crying about how you won't need them to find a field to hoe anymore. 
From the presentation i watched on Friday, it had nothing to do with what I used these skills for. Which is to find Gravs. Now I dont need them and they will be crowded. Which means less for me.
Whats with this talk of crying? All i did was state my opinion. Why you bitching and yelling to state yours? |

Haulie Berry
532
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:21:00 -
[42] - Quote
Oliver G wrote:I totally agree with the OP. CCP has made many attempts to populate low/null. All the people who want to be there are already there.
I also see the problem that the upcomming changes do not leave room for small high sec corporations to run a POS. Limiting the ICE supply is ok, but I think they overdid it. I just checked: Khanid Kingdom will not have asingle ICE anomaly in the whole region (!).
This is not limiting the ICE supply, this is completely removing the ICE supply. Why? Does CCP really want to ban POSes from high-sec in Khanid?
Khanid will likely have low-sec ice. The list of clear icicle containing systems they gave was for high security only.
That said, it continues to amaze me that people mine their own fuel. |

Haulie Berry
532
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:23:00 -
[43] - Quote
Asuna Bourne wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:Asuna Bourne wrote:Im a newer player and Im not too familiar with Gravs and Anoms.
But I read about them and I trained to scan them down and mine.
Now they will always have folks in them because they no longer need to be scanned down.
That sucks. I had to waste time training skills to do this. Had I known about this, I never would have trained those skills. ...this entire expansion is themed around doing new and exciting things with those exact skills, and you're crying about how you won't need them to find a field to hoe anymore.  From the presentation i watched on Friday, it had nothing to do with what I used these skills for. Which is to find Gravs.
That's a personal problem. Those skills are receiving quite the treatment this patch - you should try using them outside of the very narrow and boring scope of finding rocks to pick at. |

Asuna Bourne
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
Haulie Berry wrote:That's a personal problem. Those skills are receiving quite the treatment this patch - you should try using them outside of the very narrow and boring scope of finding rocks to pick at.
You're exactly right, it is a PERSONAL problem. The same way me Plexing or Paying for MY account is a PERSONAL problem.
You also have a PERSONAL problem, trying to force your opinion on others and influence the way they choose to play!
I use my skill how I want to my betterment or detriment. I determine the way I play. I'll adjust. Narrow and Boring it may be to you, is not how I view it.
How about you stop being condescending to people just because they dont play how you would like them too. Thats another PERSONAL problem of yours i see. |

Haulie Berry
532
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Asuna Bourne wrote:Haulie Berry wrote:That's a personal problem. Those skills are receiving quite the treatment this patch - you should try using them outside of the very narrow and boring scope of finding rocks to pick at. You're exactly right, it is a PERSONAL problem. The same way me Plexing or Paying for MY account is a PERSONAL problem. You also have a PERSONAL problem, trying to force your opinion on others and influence the way they choose to play! I use my skill how I want to my betterment or detriment. I determine the way I play. I'll adjust. Narrow and Boring it may be to you, is not how I view it. How about you stop being condescending to people just because they dont play how you would like them too. Thats another PERSONAL problem of yours i see.
Oooh, we've got a live one! 
Yes, you determine the way you play, but you have to understand how ridiculous you sound when you complain that you "wasted" your time training scanning skills as a result of a patch that completely revolves around revitalizing those skills.
CCP: Hey guys, here's some cool new scanning stuff! New data and relic sites! New system scan sweep! Loot-spew! Pre-made formations and the ability to launch them all at once! You: But... but I just wanted to use them to find a semi-private space to watch my mining lasers cycle ad nauseum!  |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1269
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 15:45:00 -
[46] - Quote
It's clear to anyone that's been around for a while: CCP has as much as stated that they want more people in null, and they STRONGLY encourage group activities. With every passing year this game becomes less and less welcome to solo players. Even solo activities like exploration are starting to get nerfed (for example, this stupid snatch-and-grab thing being explored now), and direct combat being actively encouraged (removal of "safe" mining activities in Grav sites).
Space is very clearly delineated: high sec for solo and casual gamers, low sec for the adventurous types to dabble in when interested, and null for people that don't mind being fodder for larger epeen seekers. That's cool, whatever works. I'm more often in low sec than high these days, just because I happen to like occassional in-your-face activities and annoying people. Did nullsec and the emoraging FCs, have zero interest to go back. Have multiple towers in high sec for when I'm more interested in thinking than playing Call Of Duty Spaceships version.
But from my perspective CCP is really pushing to make EveO more Call of Duty (FPS)-esque. That's awesome for them and the players that like FPS games. But it will continue to be a declining road for those that choose solo gameplay. It really is kinda obvious.
And no, none of you can have my stuff. It'll be trash-canned on fraps if and when I choose to move on. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Mosh Mikhailov
Psychological Operations Specialist Eternal Syndicate
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 16:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
TLDR you're not meant to play an MMO game solo. The reality is if you don't play with other people you'll get bored and quit period. Don't be surprised if they developers base their design decisions around this glaringly obvious aspect of the MMO genre. You can whine and threaten to unsubscribe all you want but the reality is CCP will gain more subscribers by fostering multiplayer gameplay than it will lose from the solo players that whine about solo gameplay that end up quitting anyway because they don't play with other people.
If you're noob undocking in your Ibis you're much more likely to stick with the game if you play with other people, sorry if you can't realise that. It's basically the answer to every question on reddit about whether or not you should play the game. |

Haulie Berry
533
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 16:42:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mosh Mikhailov wrote:TLDR you're not meant to play an MMO game solo. The reality is if you don't play with other people you'll get bored and quit period.
This isn't necessarily true. I am a pretty strictly solo player, and I've been at it since 2005. I'm usually pretty nonplussed by complaints that they're making it impossible to be a solo player. I can't think of a single expansion that ever had any tangible detrimental effect on my gameplay.
The worst, to date, was Incarna. It didn't hurt me, it just completely lacked anything of interest. |

Dave Stark
2928
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:32:00 -
[49] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:and they STRONGLY encourage group activities. except mining. it still promotes being antisocial and reclusive. |

Crexa
Ion Industrials
33
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 17:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Oliver G wrote:All the people who want to be there are already there. incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there. there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently.
First time I have agreed with you. I usually see you as a troll poster. We likely are agreeing for different reasons though.
"...its breakfast time and i am very hungry. may i have some of your paint chips?" |

Dave Stark
2935
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:04:00 -
[51] - Quote
Crexa wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Oliver G wrote:All the people who want to be there are already there. incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there. there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. First time I have agreed with you. I usually see you as a troll poster. We likely are agreeing for different reasons though.
i always troll, except about mining. mining is the one thing i am serious about. |

Carniflex
StarHunt Intrepid Crossing
79
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 18:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Eric Raeder wrote:Some ice mining will probably move from high to null or possibly even low, but it is not at all clear the price of ice products will go up. Ice miner cycle times are being cut in half, which means once an ice field is found the ice can be gathered a lot more quickly. It's quite possible ice prices will drop in the long run.
The quantity available in hi sec will be "limited". Question is how this "limited" is calculated. In devblog they mentioned that it will be enough to cover 80% of the empire towers need, if I understood correct. Assuming that every belt is mined out instantly the second it spawns.
As far as I'm aware then for all practical purposes only caldary towers are used hi sec. So I guess for a start its bad day to fly caldary capital ship ;) Yeah, sure you can find handful of other races towers up in hi sec as well.
What this means, longer term that price will stabilize at the level which corresponds to the null sec mining. That is approx 20 mil / h per account. I dont see reason to assume that the upcoming resource redistribution patch changes that significantly after the transit turbulence is over and prices settle somewhere. Null sec ice variants hold 350 isotopes per block (while hi sec versions hold 300), a max skilled Skiff with Roqual boost will mine 110 block per hour after thew 50% reduction is cykle time resulting in 38500 isotopes. Ignoring, for the sake of simplicity for the moment the minor amount of liquid ozone, heavy water and strontsium present that would mean price of approx 520 isk per unit for that max skilled Skiff to get 20 mil /h.
I should also add that I smell significant drop coming in the price of liquid ozone - as thats mainly coming from dark glitter which nets 1000 units of it per block. Dark glitter is atm sitting at approx 20 mil / h mark.
Anyway, while its a price increase in isotopes, the increase is not something I would consider the end of the world. Hi sec mining, in general, however, will get somewhat less luractive bcos of the significcant amount of low ends starting to come from the null sec. Yes they are bulky - at first. However, with the increased number of manufacturing slots mineral compression will be easier in null. I can reach as high as 1:30 compression ratio with select few mods, roghly 1:25 ratio if you are after better mix of minerals for building things. That means that a single JF run can carry max about 10.8 million cubic meters (~11 regular freighter loads) of minerals. You can (and its done on regular basis) compress Titans worth of minerals into roughly 3 JF loads. With the significant increase in low end production in null I would expect the null to change from importing low end into exporting low ends.
But we will see how rthings turn out Here, sanity... niiiice sanity, come to daddy... okay, that's a good sanity... *THWONK!* GOT the bastard. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT Joint Venture Conglomerate
540
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:36:00 -
[53] - Quote
.... realizes that the substantial difference between "forcing" people to play in Null/Low and offering them more rewards to take the risk is often ignored by the very young, chronologically speaking and/or otherwise. 
Proud Beta Tester for "Bumping Uglies for Dummies" |

Dave Stark
2953
|
Posted - 2013.04.28 19:51:00 -
[54] - Quote
Carniflex wrote:a max skilled Skiff with Roqual boost will mine 110 block per hour after thew 50% reduction is cykle time
check your maths buddy. it's 122.9 blocks with an orca.
with a rorqual it's 143.9 |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1246
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 08:31:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP are not attempting to "strong arm" people into low/null. They're attempting to properly balance a few mechanics.
Cry harder, bros. Your carebear tears and "EVE WILL DIEEEEEE" whines are delicious |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1246
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 08:37:00 -
[56] - Quote
Come to think of it, the only reason I can see why an ice-miner would cry about these changes are if they are botters. Ice prices are going to go up, after all.
Anyone complaining confirmed for a botter. |

Jove Angel
Jove Logistics
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 09:23:00 -
[57] - Quote
Hi
My little corp are ORE miners and even I understand what ccp are trying to do.
As static ICE can be permanently farmed by botters I think its a very good idea to take them away and have them pop up every 4 hours.
Im not sure about the concept of pushing miners into low or null as we would have to join a large alliance to keep us protected.
With this in mind we have no pvp skills as we are miners and hi sec gave us some sort of protection.
Having lived in 0.0 as a pvp char on another account I feel that miners have no chance what so ever unless they adhere to alliances that make profit of our ores.
Anyway I do like the idea of taking ice mining away but im not sure about moving to 0.0 with no pvp skills what so ever. Perhaps I should train Aeon and slap mining drones on it :P |

Krax As
Silent Tears in Space
19
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 13:32:00 -
[58] - Quote
as a player in eve for almost 7 years now (with some breaks in between) it seems to me like it was posted earlier. some people want to mine, others look down on them "playing for slave wages".. still, someone needs to mine for everything that people want to use / fly / pew pew.
same with fuel. that was probably the most stupid sentence I read in a while, something like ".. dont understand why you mine your own fuel..." .. well, someone HAS to mine the ice for that fuel mate.. so why not cut out the middleman if you have the time ??
not every player rates his activities on a pure ISK / H ratio.
I apreciate the intention of CCP to help players establish an industrial foothold in 0.0 and lowsec. BUT, (as stated before) as long as the bigger alliances and corps who "own" this space start caring about their own miners , things will never change.
as long as epeen and elite monster pvp players see no value to help their corp mates mine by providing security and intel and prefer hotdropping frigates and grinding sov, no serious miner wil risk his fleet of barges.
as long as industrial capacity of 0.0 can be locked up and blocked by a handful hardcore industrialists, doing all in High will just be the better option. lets be honest...even with the max upgrades on outposts one industrial heavyweight will use almost all slots on his own...I am talking 3 toon, max slot player accounts here something of which there are quiet a few out there)
as long as taking sov of systems and doing NOTHING with that space except holding it has value for alliances, why should they even bother ?
these changes are not bad. but who really benefits from them ?? defintily not the small corps, not the single players who enjoy mining in their 3-toon setup. (btw: mining is not antisocial.. those miners chat and talk and all that all day.. you just dont care about them to notice-¦and are in the wrong channel)
its the large entities with so much "safe" space that they can rat , mine and mine ice as much as they want and need. and who have the ressources to assemble the most efficient setup all the time, every time (meaning all TZ and locations).
even the the whole Moon / T2 setup and "rebalancing" does in fact nothing IF a large entity already controls enough moons / space. if they have enough access to moons already, pure chance to have enough access to those new moon materials is already big enough.
so. its a good change against botting ice. yay. its a great change f you dare enough to mine in low / null. yay. but if losing an orca and two barges sets you back almost 3 months of playing time (isk / plex wise) than these changes do nothing for you.
it might even out and the results might not be as drastic as some predict. but it is definitly not a change that makes EVE more attractive to small entities and corps and solo players. |

Velicitia
Nex Exercitus
1435
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 14:09:00 -
[59] - Quote
Zifrian wrote:So basically for refining, you need to get scrapmetal processing and refining up to 4, have a 40% refine station and use a refining implant to get "perfect" refine. Then you lose up to 10% to the owner corp.
all skills at 5, plus the implant will yield 100% in a 35% base station (less station taxes) -- there is a reason I have the elite refining certificates . Everything else was pretty spot on though ... One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia Malcanis for CSM8 |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
577
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:06:00 -
[60] - Quote
WOW, A lot of BS and tears in this thread.
lets get some facts straight,
This is not about forcing anyone into low or null sec. If they want to push players into low and null they would have to nerf the hell out of ganking or watch EVE die. It is not about forcing anyone to do anything. It is about providing incentives for players currently in high sec to want to go to null. Not force you, but make you want to go.
Sure, many carebears will never leave high sec. They do not have to if they do not want to. But those that do will have to opportunity to make more isk. Higher risk, higher reward, is that not how it should work?
Fozzie said high sec will only be capable of supplying 80% of the ice currently needed. That means 20% at least will need to be mined in null sec. why is this a problem? This is 80% of all the ice needed for the entire game. Far more than 20% of the ice products used in game are used in null sec. I have not seen the numbers, but If I had to guess, I would say currently far more than 20% of the ice in game in mined in null sec.
When I lived in null sec Dark Glitter was worth over 400,000 isk per block. It has the highest content of Liquid Ozone. in fact all the null sec icve variations have at least 10 times the LO as any of the high sec ICE. There as as many if not more POSes in low and Null as there are in high sec. Plus every ship with a jump drive needs ICE products for fuel. Roquals although not widely used consume ICE products when compressing. I would say closer to 50% of the ICE products consumed in the game are consumed in low and null sec. So why should all that ice come from high sec. Personally I think if anything, 80% from high sec is to high. But this requires all ICE belts to be mined dry every 5-6 hours. I doubt that will happen. A balance will be maintained.
As I said before this is not about forcing high sec players to go into low and null sec. But what it will do is force null sec alliances to accept that they need industrial players to survive. Alliances that do nothing but mine moons and PVP will soon be a thing of the past. While alliances that encourage and support industrial players to come out to null sec will become the new dominant forces. PVPers will still be the backbone of every null sec alliance, but having an industrial branch will be far more necessary than it was before.
My only complaint is about the changes to scanning down the hidden belts. Currently anyone can sneak in a cov-ops ships with a probe launcher and scan down those sites fairly easily. But it takes a conscious decision to do that. With the changes any ship passing through can locate them with the onboard scanner, this makes them no more safe than the static belts. There is a reason nobody mines in the static belts. It is not safe enough. What makes hidden belts safe enough is that potential gankers need to drop another high slot module for a probe launcher if they want to gank the miners. Many do not bother. How many null sec roaming fits have you seen that include a probe launcher? This change alone could nullify all the other positive changes. there is no need to encourage conflict in null sec, conflict will come on its own when the number of players living there goes up. More players per system means more spys, more fighting over resources, and opportunity for deals to be made and broken. players working to ward being the best at what they do will have more competition.
I have every intention of moving back to null. The only reason I left was when my daughter was born, I had far less time to spend in game. Living in null sec takes more time and dedication than living in null sec. In high sec when you are gone for a while and come back all your stuff is still there. In null sec If you not get on for a while you can come back to find your stuff is gone, or at an outpost you can no longer dock at.
Many players believe null sec industry is non existent. But nothing could be further from the truth. Even GOONS have industrial alts/players. Solar Citizens is basically an industrial focused alliance, sported by Solar fleet. And they are one of the biggest alliances. Null sec industry is everywhere, it just has not thrived under current conditions. I believe these changes in odyssey will help null sec industry to thrive. The Only change I would like to see is leaving the hidden belts hidden, you must use scanner probes to find these. other wise only the largest, safest null sec alliances will mine in them. |

Selene Nask
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 15:47:00 -
[61] - Quote
As someone who does have mining alt I really do not get the people who think the changes are somehow 'forcing' people like me to go to null.
It's not like all of sudden when the expansion drops there will be no need or demand for ore or ice mined in highsec.
Are people somehow thinking that null is all of sudden going to be supplying all of the demand for HS or something?
Yeah sure there will be some prices changes and maybe I won't make quite as much mining per hour in HS but even if the estimations some are putting out it hardly means zero not worth the time income.
None of the changes are anyway forcing me to go to null. All it means is that if I do ever decide to head off to null the rewards of mining there are more aligned to the risk you take mining there. Yeah I suppose if I did go to null I could now make more isk then in HS but it's hardly easy like HS mining is. And it's questionable how much more it would really be if I had to join an alliance for protection and like deal with more isk lost due to ship pew pew. Stuff I really have little interest in participating in while mining right now.
However in the future if I ever decide that alliance and more pvp play while mining and experiencing null life in general is something I'd like to do at least now 'well the mining sucks so much out there compared to HS' won't be a reason to not do it.
I think the adjustments are fine. If anything they're opening up more choice to players. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1283
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:36:00 -
[62] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Come to think of it, the only reason I can see why an ice-miner would cry about these changes are if they are botters. Ice prices are going to go up, after all.
Anyone complaining confirmed for a botter.
How is your head healing????
You've evidently been dropped on it a few times lately. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |

Danni stark
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Come to think of it, the only reason I can see why an ice-miner would cry about these changes are if they are botters. Ice prices are going to go up, after all.
Anyone complaining confirmed for a botter. How is your head healing???? You've evidently been dropped on it a few times lately.
considering these changes make mining a higher isk/hour activity over all, then yes botters are the only one with cause to complain. Yay, this account hasn't had it's signature banned. or it's account, if you're reading this. |

Ishaki
Caldari Prime Investments
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:15:00 -
[64] - Quote
Igor Slovensky wrote:The latest proposed industry changes in the new expansion appear once more to try and encourage a greater player presence in low and null sec areas of the eve universe.
That will not happen, not now, not ever. The reason should be obvious, it is not in the nature of a high sec player to even consider low or null sec as a viable opportunity.
I know plenty of people who would go to null if the politics weren't what they are today, that has nothing to do with being afraid of pew pew. |

Clansworth
Good Rock Materials
10
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 21:52:00 -
[65] - Quote
As someone who over many years has played many different styles (mostly carebearish) in both high, null, and w-space - I have always wished there was a stronger INCENTIVE for industrialists to live in null. Here's the thing - I like building, managing, rationing, etc. It is so much less rewarding, play-style wise, to do this in null, and really has been for a long time. The early days of building the player outposts were neat, but then that turned into just a grind, and their permanent nature as caused the need for new outposts to diminish. Ships like the Rorqual and even the Orca should have made things easier for null-sec industrialists - but they both missed the mark. Null sec is so sparsely populated compared to the empires, that the production should also be less dense. It doesn't make sense to have massive highly optimized production schemes when you don't have the demand density. Null sec production should have always been based around a nomadic, build it as the alliance needs it style of play.
In my mind, no one is going to 'prefer' to build in null, until this is changed. My long time thought on HOW this should be changed has always been through manufacturing modules for industrial ships. The mechanics have been there for a while, with the Rorqual's compression lines. It's just a matter of expanding the concept.
Until it makes sense to go from rock to ore to mineral to product to blasting holes with it in the enemies hull all within a player run empire, it will never be as rewarding as doing most of those steps within the NPC run empires.
Will this ice change kill any particular part of the game? no... but it will unnecessarily shake things up, without achieving the intended result. |

Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
151
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 23:21:00 -
[66] - Quote
Igor Slovensky wrote:
Nor is it in the nature of a low or null sec pvp player to suddenly want to become an industrialist.
...then why have I been reading up on indy things I would have never considered before? If it's a good money maker I'm interested.
|

xPredat0rz
Grey Templars Fidelas Constans
24
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 23:27:00 -
[67] - Quote
Minmatar Citizen160812 wrote:Igor Slovensky wrote:
Nor is it in the nature of a low or null sec pvp player to suddenly want to become an industrialist.
...then why have I been reading up on indy things I would have never considered before? If it's a good money maker I'm interested.
I have mining accounts right now that are unsubbed because it wasnt worth my effort to plex them. Now knowing the isk increases i am likely to see I am considering not only resubbing them but actually moving them out to null to mine.(Scary)
PvPers want a way yo generate isk with little work while they continue to explode things.
|

Carniflex
StarHunt Intrepid Crossing
80
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 13:34:00 -
[68] - Quote
Danni stark wrote: considering these changes make mining a higher isk/hour activity over all, then yes botters are the only one with cause to complain.
I do not think this affects significantly isk/h in mining. There will be some turbulence during the transit period and some mineral prices will change, however, I would expect mining isk/h to stabilize in the same region isk/h per account wise as it is today.
What will change, probably is hi sec mining isk/h but after the drone poo shock it might have been a bit out of the line anyway. But I would not expect even that change to be particularly large. It is more scordite nerf - in my opinion - than a general hi sec mining nerf.
I'm sure some people will be significantly affected, if they have limited playtime window and happen to be with that window in the timezone where ice belts are between respawns. For example, assuming each belt is mined out in 1h in hi sec - DT ends at 11, ice gone at 12 - new belt spawns 16, gone by 17, EU timezone comes on at 18 and if your playtime is 2h you will never see ice, ice spawns at 21, gone by 22 then respawns at 02 evetime, and be gone by 3 evetime, etc.
Here, sanity... niiiice sanity, come to daddy... okay, that's a good sanity... *THWONK!* GOT the bastard. |

Danni stark
12
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 14:13:00 -
[69] - Quote
Carniflex wrote:Danni stark wrote: considering these changes make mining a higher isk/hour activity over all, then yes botters are the only one with cause to complain.
I do not think this affects significantly isk/h in mining. There will be some turbulence during the transit period and some mineral prices will change, however, I would expect mining isk/h to stabilize in the same region isk/h per account wise as it is today. What will change, probably is hi sec mining isk/h but after the drone poo shock it might have been a bit out of the line anyway. But I would not expect even that change to be particularly large. It is more scordite nerf - in my opinion - than a general hi sec mining nerf. I'm sure some people will be significantly affected, if they have limited playtime window and happen to be with that window in the timezone where ice belts are between respawns. For example, assuming each belt is mined out in 1h in hi sec - DT ends at 11, ice gone at 12 - new belt spawns 16, gone by 17, EU timezone comes on at 18 and if your playtime is 2h you will never see ice, ice spawns at 21, gone by 22 then respawns at 02 evetime, and be gone by 3 evetime, etc.
what the hell are you babbling about? Yay, this account hasn't had it's signature banned. or it's account, if you're reading this. |

March rabbit
epTa Team Inc.
660
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 14:14:00 -
[70] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Oliver G wrote:All the people who want to be there are already there. incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there. there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. if you WANT then you simple do. if you DON"T WANT you look for the reasons to not DO. |

Zedutchman
Bluewater Industries Gold Star Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:00:00 -
[71] - Quote
I agree with CCP.
It's pointless to have 5000+ systems when everything between 0.0 and 0.5 is virtually abandoned. Honestly sneaking around in low-sec an trying not to get podded is much more interesting, than semi-AFKing in Empire. It's just not worth the effort, when mining buckets of veldspar is more profitable.
I'd be more than willing to give it a shot. Just strap on some Warp stabilizers and have at it. |

Centurion Dorn
Simplified Operations
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:58:00 -
[72] - Quote
I have to say, I like the changes. I've never really been an ice miner, so it doesn't affect me.
Gimping the fuel costs for jumping material out to low/null, increasing production lines, and adding the lower end minerals to ABC ore will go a long way to pushing more industry out to null and making this a more strategic game, but it's not a cure-all.
As I see it, the biggest thing stopping industry out in null are the players themselves. Alot of the null corps see PvP/CTA's as being needed by everyone in order to contribute. They don't see the indy guys pumping out ships and modules for them as a contribution. It is, but you can't convince them otherwise. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3287
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 19:05:00 -
[73] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Dave Stark wrote:Oliver G wrote:All the people who want to be there are already there. incorrect. i want to be in null, however i make more isk in high sec so i am there. there's no incentive for me to go in to null, currently. those who WANT look for opportunities those who DON"T WANT look for reasons
So under the current mechanics, for the people who WANT to produce things for a profit and PREFER to do it in Nullsec, what exactly are these magical "opportunities"?
The Sov fuel discount doesn't cover the increased cost of transport, Local nullsec does not have the population to support the volume that a single industrialists with a single large POS can put out, transport's an expensive nuisance (it cost me 14m to have people move ~8b ISK/5m m3 worth of minerals from Jita to my build site this morning. To move it instead to Todi in LS would have cost me ~500m in fuel alone using a 1 mid JF route, well over a bil factoring in market prices for LS JF services), your station (if you're lucky enough to have one with free office and manufacturing slots in a system you can put a POS up) can be attacked and taken locking down your assets.
What "opportunity" does nullsec currently offer to someone who wants to build things that HS or LS doesn't do far better?*
Far better from any rational standpoint to simply run a HS manufacturing operation on an alt and shoot things in your preferred area of space with your main.
*Aside from supers, which are only built in null because there's quite literally no alternative. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |

Zedutchman
Bluewater Industries Gold Star Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 19:46:00 -
[74] - Quote
I'm not sure It's a full fledged push to move profitable industry into NULL . I think it's mostly just adding convenience for those who choose to do it anyway, even though it's inefficient. Keep in mind this is only the first step in what sounds like a extended plan to tempt pilots out of High-sec.
I think the changes in Odyssey will mostly effect mining and resource gathering rather than manufacturing. Although I Hope eventually it might even out more . |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
3289
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 23:34:00 -
[75] - Quote
Zedutchman wrote:I'm not sure It's a full fledged push to move profitable industry into NULL . I think it's mostly just adding convenience for those who choose to do it anyway, even though it's inefficient. Keep in mind this is only the first step in what sounds like a extended plan to tempt pilots out of High-sec.
I think the changes in Odyssey will mostly effect mining and resource gathering rather than manufacturing. Although I Hope eventually it might even out more .
The increase in production slots in refining stations makes local production of ship hulls from compressed (and locally sourced) minerals far more reasonable. The increase in Ice prices makes that more enticing, as you can fit something along the lines of 140 battleships worth of compressed minerals in a JF instead of just 7 battleship hulls (or like 4-5 battleships worth of uncompressed minerals? I don't know, Compression is Lord, raw minerals suck).
But yeah, proper "I'm going to make a living off this" industry in Nullsec's some ways off. This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
"the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP)." -CCP Solomon |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |