Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Angang Ostus
Shooting Red Crosses
67
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:I think the PVE in EVE is basically ok (I do null sec exploration, low sec PVE except FW, and high sec exploration and incursions), people who keep screaming for pve "iteration" are just people who are easily bored and should probably be playing a more PVE oriented game to begin with.
People who argue for PVE being left in the dust while literally everything else receives extensive iteration are just reactionaries who reject diversity.
|

Brainless Bimbo
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:25:00 -
[62] - Quote
Everyone in eve should be considered a solo player, from one man corps to big alliance bosses, after all its all personal ego....
Simply put, the meta games and the lack of trust it engenders along with the multiple accounts its evident we are all out just for our selves.
Huge scams, corp rip offs, disbanding BoB, all solo players that kicked the others.
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
773
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:28:00 -
[63] - Quote
Brainless Bimbo wrote:Everyone in eve should be considered a solo player, from one man corps to big alliance bosses, after all its all personal ego....
Simply put, the meta games and the lack of trust it engenders along with the multiple accounts its evident we are all out just for our selves.
Huge scams, corp rip offs, disbanding BoB, all solo players that kicked the others.
Ya, exactly. It would actually be a bad move to make group interaction too easy and structured. Groups should be fractious and constantly rising and falling.
Otherwise it's just "clanwars" online, which empties out a huge range of group formation and maintenance that makes interaction in Eve so fun. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
2695
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:30:00 -
[64] - Quote
Most of those people who say "this is a multiplayer game go back to WoW" are the ones who tend to take glee in ganking, scamming, etc. and exhibit an inability to get over themselves.
The rest of the players, regardless of what the do, do whatever they want, and don't care what anybody else does. They might play in groups, they might play solo, they probably do both..
Most important of all, they don't sit there saying "Eve is...." and then try to adhere to it like some kind of religion.
Self-interest and not giving a rats ass what anybody thinks - that's a sandbox. That's also an exercise in liberty.
Sometimes I suspect that the "Eve is... and therefore all must adhere to it" crowd are the kids who grew up watching too many political speeches where they were sold on the virtues of seeking out causes "greater than themselves". Well, whatever one's opinion on any cause, I doubt a video game is one of them.
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1684
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 17:43:00 -
[65] - Quote
Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:I think the PVE in EVE is basically ok (I do null sec exploration, low sec PVE except FW, and high sec exploration and incursions), people who keep screaming for pve "iteration" are just people who are easily bored and should probably be playing a more PVE oriented game to begin with. People who argue for PVE being left in the dust while literally everything else receives extensive iteration are just reactionaries who reject diversity.
That's just paranoid BS. PVE gets iterated on all the time (incursion nerf/ buff, null sec anom buffs/nerfs, the mission ui overhaul last year, the major NPC AI change that happened a few months ago etc etc etc). Hell, the next expansion will include major changes or additions to key parts of PVE (anomaly rebalance, scanning changes, ice anoms, major mag/radar overhaul).
WTf are you talking about anyway?
EVE PVE is fine, hell its better than it was 2 years ago. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's broken.
|

Angang Ostus
Shooting Red Crosses
67
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 18:53:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:I think the PVE in EVE is basically ok (I do null sec exploration, low sec PVE except FW, and high sec exploration and incursions), people who keep screaming for pve "iteration" are just people who are easily bored and should probably be playing a more PVE oriented game to begin with. People who argue for PVE being left in the dust while literally everything else receives extensive iteration are just reactionaries who reject diversity. That's just paranoid BS (the paranoid part is ignoring all the great recent PVE changes while concntrating attention on the few changes that have affected pvp). PVE gets iterated on all the time (incursion nerf/ buff, null sec anom buffs/nerfs, the mission ui overhaul last year, the major NPC AI change that happened a few months ago etc etc etc). Hell, the next expansion will include major changes or additions to key parts of PVE (anomaly rebalance, scanning changes, ice anoms, major mag/radar overhaul). WTf are you talking about anyway? EVE PVE is fine, hell its better than it was 2 years ago. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's broken.
It's not broken. It's just old and tired. There are two kinds of iteration, maintenance and new stuff. Everything up to now since Apocrypha, other than Incursions, has been maintenance. That's important and those changes have been great. Odyssey is clearly going to add some new content to exploration. Hopefully it's more than just the model of the ancient colony ships they showed at Fanfest. If they think just that plus pinata mechanics is going to instill " a sense of wonder" in us they've got another thing coming.
You're wrong. EVE PVE is not fine. Anything in an MMORPG that has only received maintenance but precious little new stuff for this many years is far from just fine. |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness Clockwork Pineapple
1848
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 19:03:00 -
[67] - Quote
then you have the real issue
solo pvp is acceptable and encouraged solo mining is not
so lets be clear on what aspect of solo play people really hate |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
598
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 19:04:00 -
[68] - Quote
Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:I think the PVE in EVE is basically ok (I do null sec exploration, low sec PVE except FW, and high sec exploration and incursions), people who keep screaming for pve "iteration" are just people who are easily bored and should probably be playing a more PVE oriented game to begin with. People who argue for PVE being left in the dust while literally everything else receives extensive iteration are just reactionaries who reject diversity. That's just paranoid BS (the paranoid part is ignoring all the great recent PVE changes while concntrating attention on the few changes that have affected pvp). PVE gets iterated on all the time (incursion nerf/ buff, null sec anom buffs/nerfs, the mission ui overhaul last year, the major NPC AI change that happened a few months ago etc etc etc). Hell, the next expansion will include major changes or additions to key parts of PVE (anomaly rebalance, scanning changes, ice anoms, major mag/radar overhaul). WTf are you talking about anyway? EVE PVE is fine, hell its better than it was 2 years ago. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's broken. It's not broken. It's just old and tired. There are two kinds of iteration, maintenance and new stuff. Everything up to now since Apocrypha, other than Incursions, has been maintenance. That's important and those changes have been great. Odyssey is clearly going to add some new content to exploration. Hopefully it's more than just the model of the ancient colony ships they showed at Fanfest. If they think just that plus pinata mechanics is going to instill " a sense of wonder" in us they've got another thing coming. You're wrong. EVE PVE is not fine. Anything in an MMORPG that has only received maintenance but precious little new stuff for this many years is far from just fine.
EvE Online is an old school sandbox mmo-rpg game, not a kindergarten themepark game. In EvE, players are the content. It makes no sense to spend CCP precious time making worthless themepark stuff.
What CCP should do is constantly iterate and improve the existing systems (like in the last 3 expansions) and intruduce new sandbox features (Odyssey). |

Skeln Thargensen
Filthy Carebear Tax Avoidance Shell Corp
139
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 19:05:00 -
[69] - Quote
yeah, missions could use an overhaul in particular. they're unengaging grindfests currently. freelance space bum |

Angang Ostus
Shooting Red Crosses
67
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:17:00 -
[70] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:Angang Ostus wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:I think the PVE in EVE is basically ok (I do null sec exploration, low sec PVE except FW, and high sec exploration and incursions), people who keep screaming for pve "iteration" are just people who are easily bored and should probably be playing a more PVE oriented game to begin with. People who argue for PVE being left in the dust while literally everything else receives extensive iteration are just reactionaries who reject diversity. That's just paranoid BS (the paranoid part is ignoring all the great recent PVE changes while concntrating attention on the few changes that have affected pvp). PVE gets iterated on all the time (incursion nerf/ buff, null sec anom buffs/nerfs, the mission ui overhaul last year, the major NPC AI change that happened a few months ago etc etc etc). Hell, the next expansion will include major changes or additions to key parts of PVE (anomaly rebalance, scanning changes, ice anoms, major mag/radar overhaul). WTf are you talking about anyway? EVE PVE is fine, hell its better than it was 2 years ago. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's broken. It's not broken. It's just old and tired. There are two kinds of iteration, maintenance and new stuff. Everything up to now since Apocrypha, other than Incursions, has been maintenance. That's important and those changes have been great. Odyssey is clearly going to add some new content to exploration. Hopefully it's more than just the model of the ancient colony ships they showed at Fanfest. If they think just that plus pinata mechanics is going to instill " a sense of wonder" in us they've got another thing coming. You're wrong. EVE PVE is not fine. Anything in an MMORPG that has only received maintenance but precious little new stuff for this many years is far from just fine. EvE Online is an old school sandbox mmo-rpg game, not a kindergarten themepark game. In EvE, players are the content. It makes no sense to spend CCP precious time making worthless themepark stuff. What CCP should do is constantly iterate and improve the existing systems (like in the last 3 expansions) and intruduce new sandbox features (Odyssey).
I don't think in black and white like you. I see a grey area where sci fi lovers like myself can get some content while the sandbox continues to roll on. I can participate fully in the sandbox while taking time on the side to enjoy some content that immerses me in the world in a different way. And make some ISK while I'm at it, which I need to do anyway. If CCP is lacking in "precious time" to make this happen, then...well I hope they heed voices like mine and hire the right people.
You can be as disrespectful as you like but more PVE content would improve EVE for a lot of us. And I'm talking about people who love EVE and want to invest in it and want to be active in player interaction and emergent content. |
|

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
445
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:33:00 -
[71] - Quote
Sigh. It's your game time, play how you want. End of story. CCP will cater to what their numbers show. If all of a sudden, tomorrows data showed that 75% of the player were solo players, CCP's next expansion would be all for solo players. Thats the way Corporations work in real life. They cater to their customer base or someone else will and they go out of business.
dark heartt wrote:It's not so much the solo gameplay that people dislike, it's the mindset that people generally get from playing solo. I do a lot of solo activities in game as my time permits, but I also involve myself in the community. I would say that the vast majority of solo players are the miners and industrialists out there and they tend to complain about being killed by gankers and use the 'highsec should be safe argument'.
The other major thing is that they feel solo players don't bring any emergent gameplay to the sandbox, so they don't contribute anything to the game.
That and some people just like to hate on other peoples gameplay styles just because it isn't their own.
I agree and disagree.
I agree that it's not so much solo players, its the solo players that complain about Solo content when EVE is clearly marketing as a game with immense social implications that are the problem. I disagree that its the vast majority. I dont think there is anyway to put a number on this. Unless CCP has offical data on this, this is just conjecture. "The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB |

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Late Night Alliance
2362
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 22:56:00 -
[72] - Quote
The general impression I came away from Fanfest with was that CCP want to make more PvE content... but they want it to be more geared towards group play... and by that I mean; you can still run content solo, you just won't be very efficient doing it by yourself (or multiboxing).
And as far as the state of PvE is concerned Angang Ostus... the problem with creating whole new PvE content that people can run by themselves is that it will be mapped out and become repetitive in the space of 6 months or less. Then the DEVs are back at square one. Rinse and repeat.
The best content we have got PvE-wise (in my opinion) is where the DEVs gave us tools and a situation that cannot be solo'ed by a single player (not without very significant effort and/or risk at least).
Wormholes are a good example of this. C1s to C3s can be solo'd... it's hard and risky but doable. Beyond that you NEED people... because if the Sleepers don't rip you a new one then someone residing or invading it will. Incursions... pure group content. When they first came out people whinged and bitched because they lost their pimp fit Rattlesnakes and CNRs screaming "I shouldn't be forced to work with others." A year later it's now "old and tired" PvE... but wait... it's still chugging and still causing drama... because the players themselves are causing it... because the site forces them to interact.
Whether some like it or not... content that encourages group interaction and conflict is the way this game is going to evolve... simply because it's more future proof than anything else. Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
359
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:27:00 -
[73] - Quote
I'll have to admit. My main money maker is in an NPC corp. I sometimes interact with people, but always at arms length... With a 10 foot pole.
I suppose saying this will make someone invariably mad as they claim that NPC corps are the bane of EVE's existence.
I suppose I could join someone else's corp but then I would have to deal with corp taxes, asshatery, wardec's, and awoxing.
I suppose then you could cry and whine on the forums til the dev's forced everyone out of NPC corps, but then I'd just start a one man corp and disband every time someone war dec's me.
Sometimes putting up with other people is too much work.
"Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:31:00 -
[74] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:I'll have to admit. My main money maker is in an NPC corp. I sometimes interact with people, but always at arms length... With a 10 foot pole.
I suppose saying this will make someone invariably mad as they claim that NPC corps are the bane of EVE's existence.
I suppose I could join someone else's corp but then I would have to deal with corp taxes, asshatery, wardec's, and awoxing.
I suppose then you could cry and whine on the forums til the dev's forced everyone out of NPC corps, but then I'd just start a one man corp and disband every time someone war dec's me.
Sometimes putting up with other people is too much work.
Go nuts, nobody actually cares what you DO; we just care when you cry on the forums as the box you put yourself in gets smaller and smaller.
|

Seven Koskanaiken
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
151
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll45/vahrokh/EvE/Misc/EvE_Box_back_zps234d30bc.jpg |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1686
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 23:41:00 -
[76] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:I'll have to admit. My main money maker is in an NPC corp. I sometimes interact with people, but always at arms length... With a 10 foot pole.
I suppose saying this will make someone invariably mad as they claim that NPC corps are the bane of EVE's existence.
I suppose I could join someone else's corp but then I would have to deal with corp taxes, asshatery, wardec's, and awoxing.
I suppose then you could cry and whine on the forums til the dev's forced everyone out of NPC corps, but then I'd just start a one man corp and disband every time someone war dec's me.
Sometimes putting up with other people is too much work. Go nuts, nobody actually cares what you DO; we just care when you cry on the forums as the box you put yourself in gets smaller and smaller.
No matter how many times you say it Varius, it keeps on being true (truth does that lol) .
I jsut sometimes feel sorry for people, namely the people who somehow need to think "it's all about me". It drives me a little crazy when someone pulls out that "you must want me to play differently" BS. I mean seriously, what does that say about a person that they could actually feel that way?
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
8134
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:24:00 -
[77] - Quote
First up, I'm mainly a solo hisec PvE/Industry player with 3 characters. Solo play is fine, it's the attitudes of some of the people who do it that are the problem, that can change with time, mine certainly has.
I came to Eve from a non MMO gaming background, I was shocked the first time I got killed and wailed in local, everybody enjoyed my tears 3 months later I realised that one day, I could be the one doing the killing. I left highsec, lived in wormholes for 2 years, exploded a bit, lived in lowsec for 6 months, did the group thing and exploded some more, but solo and highsec is how I prefer to play, for the moment. It doesn't stop me teaming up with like minded folk when an opportune target presents itself or to achieve something that requires teamwork though.  A war hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
361
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:31:00 -
[78] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Varius Xeral wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:I'll have to admit. My main money maker is in an NPC corp. I sometimes interact with people, but always at arms length... With a 10 foot pole.
I suppose saying this will make someone invariably mad as they claim that NPC corps are the bane of EVE's existence.
I suppose I could join someone else's corp but then I would have to deal with corp taxes, asshatery, wardec's, and awoxing.
I suppose then you could cry and whine on the forums til the dev's forced everyone out of NPC corps, but then I'd just start a one man corp and disband every time someone war dec's me.
Sometimes putting up with other people is too much work. Go nuts, nobody actually cares what you DO; we just care when you cry on the forums as the box you put yourself in gets smaller and smaller. No matter how many times you say it Varius, it keeps on being true (truth does that lol)  . I jsut sometimes feel sorry for people, namely the people who somehow need to think "it's all about me". It drives me a little crazy when someone pulls out that "you must want me to play differently" BS. I mean seriously, what does that say about a person that they could actually feel that way?
I don't know. I've seen a lot of mad players demand that NPC corps be nerfed. I don't care either way. I'm only one step away from running everything in a one man corp. But many of you seem like you want me to join an alliance and kowtow to the powers that be. Its as if there is a group of players are just incensed at the fact player plays solo.
As long as you say "I don't care about NPC corps and solo players" then we're all cool. Its just that I have seen the opposite on many occasions. As long as playing solo is viable, I'll keep playing. Who knows, I might have a seperate account with a SA forum account just waiting for the 3 months so I can get in. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:41:00 -
[79] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:I don't know. I've seen a lot of mad players demand that NPC corps be nerfed. I don't care either way. I'm only one step away from running everything in a one man corp. But many of you seem like you want me to join an alliance and kowtow to the powers that be. Its as if there is a group of players are just incensed at the fact player plays solo.
As long as you say "I don't care about NPC corps and solo players" then we're all cool. Its just that I have seen the opposite on many occasions. As long as playing solo is viable, I'll keep playing. Who knows, I might have a seperate account with a SA forum account just waiting for the 3 months so I can get in.
Nonono, we don't care that you refuse to play interactively. That doesn't mean we don't support changes that hamper your playstyle.
Not caring what YOU do, does not equate to not caring how the game is structured.
I fully support the removal of NPC corps given that the few essentials they provide (new player stuff) is handled by new (better) mechanisms. I don't care whether that's a burden or boon to YOU.
|

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
361
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote: That doesn't mean we don't support changes that hamper your playstyle.
So to borrow from my sig... So you hate the way I play and it makes you cry like a baby?
I suppose I should enjoy your tears while it lasts. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 00:48:00 -
[81] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Varius Xeral wrote: That doesn't mean we don't support changes that hamper your playstyle. So to borrow from my sig... So you hate the way I play and it makes you cry like a baby? I suppose I should enjoy your tears while it lasts.
No, it means precisely the opposite. Play however you want, I could not care less.
The fact that a change benefits or hinders you means nothing to me. |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
361
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:02:00 -
[82] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:Varius Xeral wrote: That doesn't mean we don't support changes that hamper your playstyle. So to borrow from my sig... So you hate the way I play and it makes you cry like a baby? I suppose I should enjoy your tears while it lasts. No, it means precisely the opposite. Play however you want, I could not care less. The fact that a change benefits or hinders you means nothing to me.
I don't know. The desire to see the way I play the game changed seems to mean a hatred towards how I play the game.
So you don't care how I feel, but you just feel strongly about what I do and it makes you get all mad and run to the forums saying "I don't like how the game is played this way! Waaah! Change it! Or else!"
Seriously, if you didn't care, why are you replying to me? Seems that you do.
Should I lick you face to get a gulp of those tasty tears of your demanding the game to be changed to suit yoru personal viewpoints? "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:20:00 -
[83] - Quote
Nope. I begrudge no player who plays the game within the eula and tos.
|

Eurydia Vespasian
nova insula mining and industrial
2386
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:31:00 -
[84] - Quote
i find myself playing "solo" more lately. though i'm never really alone because i am constantly talking in channels or sometimes comms and getting interaction that way.
but i play solo a lot because i do a lot of exploration and stuff....and don't like to share my isk making sites.  |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
361
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:37:00 -
[85] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Nope. I begrudge no player who plays the game within the eula and tos.
And I will quote you Varius Xeral wrote:That doesn't mean we don't support changes that hamper your playstyle.
So you want my playstyle to go away because it doesn't suit your tastes... I'm pretty sure that is a sign you hate that aspect of the game and therefore hate the way those players play the game.
Again, I can only see this as you being mad and angry about how others play the game because you don't want them to play the game in that way. So you come to the forums and put up a fuss about how X gameplay mechanic should be changed because of your personal opinion that no one should play the game like that.
I mean why would you want to hamper other player's playstyle if you didn't hate the way they played?
So mad. Its so sad.
Keep replying. I enjoy your excuses. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
It's not the same. People respond to the rules and incentives they are faced with, and as long as they're playing within the rules of the game, how they respond to those rules and incetives is totally up to them. That doesn't mean that the rules and incentives with which we all are faced, including myself, cannot be improved from my perspective. If my perspective comes at the cost of how someone else chooses to respond, too bad for them. I still care as little about how they play as I did before, which is nothing.
Unless you have something new to add this is my last response, as I feel I've made myself more than clear. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
651
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 01:53:00 -
[87] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:It's not the same. People respond to the rules and incentives they are faced with, and as long as they're playing within the rules of the game, how they respond to those rules and incetives is totally up to them. That doesn't mean that the rules and incentives with which we all are faced, including myself, cannot be improved from my perspective. If my perspective comes at the cost of how someone else chooses to respond, too bad for them. I still care as little about how they play as I did before, which is nothing.
Unless you have something new to add this is my last response, as I feel I've made myself more than clear. I'm not sure how a person who doesn't care how others play can even have an opinion on game changes. Having an opinion on changes to how people interact evidences an opinion on various types of interaction or lack thereof. You may not care how an individual plays persay, but you would have to find a certain interaction or means of avoiding it undesirable, thus you clearly do have some concern regarding our activities collectively. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
782
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 02:00:00 -
[88] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:I'm not sure how a person who doesn't care how others play can even have an opinion on game changes. Having an opinion on changes to how people interact evidences an opinion on various types of interaction or lack thereof. You may not care how an individual plays persay, but you would have to find a certain interaction or means of avoiding it undesirable, thus you clearly do have some concern regarding our activities collectively.
Absolutely. I care how the rules and incentives affect me, which other players may be the vessel for, but I don't begrudge the players because they are merely playing the game as I am, which is as best suits them. Therefore, I do not care how others play.
Not complicated. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1688
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:15:00 -
[89] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:
I don't know. I've seen a lot of mad players demand that NPC corps be nerfed. I don't care either way. I'm only one step away from running everything in a one man corp. But many of you seem like you want me to join an alliance and kowtow to the powers that be. Its as if there is a group of players are just incensed at the fact player plays solo.
That's conflating issues. Being in an NPC corp isn't a "playstyle".
I don't like NPC corps because they artifically insolate players for consequneces other players have to deal with for very little cost. That's a game balance issue, not a play style issue. Pve vs pve, thats an example of a play style issue.
And none of us who think veteraqn players hiding in NPC corps is unfair care where the players go (whether it's to a one man corp or some big alliance) so long as they are then exposed to the same situations everyone else in high sec are. Even within npc corps, npc corps are unfair (mission runners and explorers pay taxes, miners and haulers don't).
Wishing for equitible situations among customers isn't "caring about how someone plays or where in space they live". My dislike of npc corps is philosophical I would dislike Unicorns crapping isk just as much.
Quote: As long as you say "I don't care about NPC corps and solo players" then we're all cool. Its just that I have seen the opposite on many occasions. As long as playing solo is viable, I'll keep playing. Who knows, I might have a seperate account with a SA forum account just waiting for the 3 months so I can get in.
You have a very warped way of seeing things. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
1688
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 04:22:00 -
[90] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: I'm not sure how a person who doesn't care how others play can even have an opinion on game changes.
Very easily. How someone plays and issues with game rules are seperate things.
I don't know of one person who cares that I do incursions or faciton warfare (no one ever snet me a mail saying "yo dude, FW missioning is all "alternative lifestyle" and you shouldn't do it).
They (and I) DID care what the former inbalances those things had did to the game, which is why they got nerfed (bad for me personally,good for the game in general). Just because i liked to farm FW LP doesn't mean that was good for the game.
Some people are so bloody self centered that they can't imagine a situation that is good for them could need nerfing. CCP is about to nerf my beloved Forsaken Hubs in oddessy, and eventualy they are gonna nerf my even more beloved Machariel (they've already said so). I don't LIKE it, but I accept it as just the way it has to be.
Many many people couldn't imagine saying what I just typed lol. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |