Which is what, refusing to listen to a few mindless people who are making personal attacks against a person they have never met demanding answers to a question that they have no right to.

Which is what, refusing to listen to a few mindless people who are making personal attacks against a person they have never met demanding answers to a question that they have no right to.

Which is what, refusing to listen to a few mindless people who are making personal attacks against a person they have never met demanding answers to a question that they have no right to.

I hear whiteknighting is all the rage nowadays...

1. Your point being what?
2. The developers preach now.. please show me were they preach.
3. No, you are not making founded and reasons criticisms at all. I have yet to see any rounded and reasonable criticisms, only a load of vile hateful rubbish.
4. You want the ability to want answers.. lol, I have never heard so much rubbish in my life. Just because CCP likes to engage its customers like any half decent company would, it does not mean that you can then want to know why they hired and fired people.
5. Like I said, just because you are paying customers it don't mean a thing when it comes to anything outside of the game Eve, and that includes hiring people.
6. I can play that game as well.. see answer 3 :)
7. It depends on the context.. are we talking about pathology, biology or psychology.

I learned that you are talking rubbish, have a personal agenda against somebody who you have never met and also.. This is my main..

Belligerent disregard and resentment, yeah.

Pretty sure you need to look up the meaning of those words

I hear that posting rubbish is all the rage as well :)

It is their past action that is the issue.

1) An employee does tasks for a company to make a product. Thus the product is altered. In this case, the product is Eve.
2) Check interviews, old posts, blog posts, etc. The very existence of the blogs, social media, and forum sections specifically to solicit crowd sourcing from the community speaks to this. They are the tenants of strong community building and branding. CCP maneuvered their brand to not only be a dynamic space sim, but a company 'in touch' with its community demonstrated by the sheer amount of interaction going on.
3) See post #52 for the criticisms. If you are not capable of reading and understanding the criticisms, then you are not credible in this argument at all and can be dismissed.
4) Why can we not want to know? Why are you using ad hominem?
5) See point 2 as to why it indeed does matter.
6) Good for you.
7) Sociological. Emergent behavioral patterns originating from a group which then spreads out to cause more action. Social media is a good example of latent action spurred on by an event.

I once again suggest you read Post #52 to understand the actual logical reasoning behind this as opposed to dismissing the claims of others as 'agenda based' or misogynistic. We don't care that she's a woman. We wouldn't care if she was a sentient lemur. It is their past action that is the issue.

I am almost certain this is what it sounds like when a hipster realizes that his cherished nitch hobby is about to go mainstream.

It only seems like a few today, because so many were slain yesterday.

There's only the decimated camp on one side of the field whose warriors are now more careful, and the frightened , on the other side of the field the white knights and fans are still at full strength.

The battlefield is strew with the corpses of the blunt, the overtly truthful, the twitter, youtube and picture linkers.

which ones? the ones where she criticized eve (far from the first ccp employee to do so)?

1. The task in question is answering questions and forum moderation for Dust.. how does that effect Eve?
2. Yet at no point would I consider any of them preaching.. like I asked before.. give me a link to something which can be classed as preaching.
3. I have read them but all I see is personal attacks and nothing which states that she can not do the job that she has been hired for. In fact she has things which would make her a good candidate such as having over 25k subs on her youtube channel which would indicate that people like her, which is good for a community rep.
4. You can not know because if has nothing to do with you. Also, I am pretty damn sure that CCP are not able to post what her qualification are because that would be classed as private data.
5. See point 2.
6. Thank you :)
7. Lol.. well you have me beat by that one. Far too clever for me :)

Her past actions have no relation to her job. So posts youtube vids, she complained about the Eve community.. who hasn't, and as for the rest I will not talk about as what she does in her personal life is up to her and nothing to do with anybody here.

I have no idea if she was the most qualified for the job because I have no idea what her qualifications are and what the post required and was not involved in her interview.

That's the point, nobody here knows.. hence why it all amounts to nothing then personal attacks as nobody has the facts apart from CCP and they are the only people who matter.

Mainstream? EVE? Get real..... .seriously.

which ones? the ones where she criticized eve (far from the first ccp employee to do so)?

Do some research and see how far the rabbit hole goes. It's not pretty.

Which is what, refusing to listen to a few mindless people who are making personal attacks against a person they have never met demanding answers to a question that they have no right to.

i did but i couldnt find anything, sorry :(

It is not personal attacking, it is critical thinking based on the evidence at hand.

Which is pretty limited, seeing as she hasn't been giving us information related to a job application. Seems that CCP, having gone through a formal hiring process, is far more likely to have the relevant information. What you're doing isn't critical thinking, it's looking at limited facts and jumping to conclusions.

Which is pretty limited, seeing as she hasn't been giving us information related to a job application. Seems that CCP, having gone through a formal hiring process, is far more likely to have the relevant information. What you're doing isn't critical thinking, it's looking at limited facts and jumping to conclusions.

They appear to have been deleted along with her Twitter posts. Someone can eve mail you links to saved copies if they are so inclined. I saw a lot floating around yesterday.

My god, this (blank). The prose, the sparkling wit, s/he's a genius! An unknown quantity! S/he'll lead our company into the 23rd century!

Again, this is not related to her qualifications or ability as a community manager. What is questioned and would beg an explanation is why she, of all people, was hired given her history and reputation with the community? I studied PR as an undergrad and one of the key things when hiring a community rep or any client/customer facing employee is to assess the persons online sentiment towards them. Customers are not idiots despite some beliefs. If they see a rep being employed, and that rep is loathed by the customers, you have problems.

The only possibility of being hired were to be if she brought some kind of financially tempting plan or skill to the table. The ROI would need to be HUGE to warrant the risk. But, THAT is jumping to a conclusion (Occam's Razor).

Having read through this thread and the deleted one, this 'loathing' isn't universal, not even amongst the subset of people that use the forums.

Fact is, most [/i ]players don't have a problem with her, it's just that the ones that do are particularly vocal. But none of the people opposing her hiring have made complaints about her lack of ability to do her job. It's all about how they [i]fear she will do, or things that she has done in the past - which are unrelated to her current job.

The bit about what she brings to the table is pretty much irrelevant - she's already been hired, the decision has been made. How it was arrived at is not really our concern.