| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:28:00 -
[91] - Quote
RAW23 wrote:Far Wanderer wrote:RAW23 wrote:This thread is nine months old  ...and it's still being linked to, which means new readers had to slog through post after post of major jerk factor in order to read anything useful.  Who on earth is still linking to this thread? Who cares?
If it doesn't interest you, that's fine. Plenty of other threads on MD for you to play in and they don't all need to be to your satisfaction to remain open.
HTFU and GTFO. Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. --Azual Skoll |

RAW23
737
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 20:19:00 -
[92] - Quote
Far Wanderer wrote:RAW23 wrote:Far Wanderer wrote:RAW23 wrote:This thread is nine months old  ...and it's still being linked to, which means new readers had to slog through post after post of major jerk factor in order to read anything useful.  Who on earth is still linking to this thread? Who cares?
I do. You said people were still linking to it and I'm interested in who is crazy enough to find this to be a valid topic of conversation nine months later.
HTFU hardly seems applicable here.
As to GTFO - no, why on earth would I do that.
And why are you so upset? There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 06:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
RAW23 wrote:Ah - I see you are a veritable fountain of terrible ideas that demand unnecessary CCP interference in the game. I fully understand your attraction to this thread now. Laying out bait to get the thread closed, eh?
Bye bye now. 
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. --Azual Skoll |

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 06:14:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jade Raikki wrote:As an economy nerd you just gave me an orgasm. Realistically speaking tho, the system would not work well with the current eve framework. If you introduced some risks on those bonds however, interesting things could come out. Risk free bonds would be a disaster, but what if there was a risk ? It's politics, after all. What sort of risks did you have in mind?  Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. --Azual Skoll |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
HIFI INDUSTRIAL The Kadeshi
284
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 11:33:00 -
[95] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:...
The major and minor factions all pay ISK to players via missions & bounty prizes and they receive ISK via transaction taxes, skill books etc. However they are running a deficit which is covered by "printing" ISK and hence increasing the money supply.
Instead of printing ISK... ISK seems to be balanced, thus your rational for change doesn't seem to exist.
CSM8 - August 2013 Summit Minutes
Dr. EyjoG said...
The next graph showed the money supply. Overall, the money supply is evening out--changes to systems have reduced the ISK supply, so average ISK in active wallets is stable as of November 2012 and the maximum amount may even be peaking. While Mike points out that the leveling-out at the top of the graph is very short, Dr. EyjoG responded that it was the first plateau visible at all. Sinks and faucets are fairly balanced right now, with a bit more faucet than sink to allow for economic growth.
------ |

Ester Hughes
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 14:20:00 -
[96] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:With the recent development and expansions of EVE I believe its time to take the step to create a better capital market. Creation of a "risk free" rate. In order to value all other financial products in Eve, a risk free rate is essential. The major and minor factions all pay ISK to players via missions & bounty prizes and they receive ISK via transaction taxes, skill books etc. However they are running a deficit which is covered by "printing" ISK and hence increasing the money supply. Instead of printing ISK, CCP can create a risk free rate by selling bonds through EVE market (at NPC bank stations) to cover the defecit. I suggest 3 types of bonds: 1 week, 1mth and 3mth bonds, which are sold every Sunday. All bonds will have a notional of 10mio ISK and the rate determined by selling price. Players can enter market orders at fx 99.00 which means that the player pay 9.9mio for the bond and receive 10mio at maturity. CCP start filling highest bids first and fill them until the deficit have been covered. If rates get to high or market orders cannot cover the deficit , CCP central bank will buy the outstanding bonds by printing. To make the system more realistic and incorporated with EVE universe the current currency ISK which is completely unrealistic need to be replaced. ( https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2974285#post2974285 ) Instead of 1 currency (ISK) , 4 new currencies wud need to be created , each printed and regulated by the major factions: Caldari yen -Ñ , Gallente Mark , Minmatar pund -ú and Amarr franc Géú. We need these changes to create a free banking system and later a efficient stock & bond market. I will create another thread on these topics later. EDIT: I have been criticised by some players not to outline the bigger picture, so I will try to outline it here: (This thread is only based on step 1-5, but i hope we can discuss some of the next steps in other threads) Step 1. Creation of 1 active central bank which issue fixed income securities based on the deficit. 2. Creation of a secondary market for state securities. 3. The One central bank is divided into 4 banks, each issuing securities within their respective area but in the same currency (ISK). 4. FX Market: 4 new currencies are introduced. To avoid distorting the market, NPC banks will act as FX Brokers and FX exchange rates are pegged to each and Plex. Bid-ask spread will be set at <0.5% keeping transaction costs very low in the beginning. 5. When players have gotten more use to the new concepts FX rates can be widen to a band of maybe 5-10% (later maybe even more). Players can then start acting as FX dealers and brokers. 6. When the first 5 steps have been implemented, the state securities will now hold both FX risk and Inflation Risk. 7. Creation of active NPC banks reporting to their respective central bank. NPC banks already exist in EVE, but they do not play any role. Players would have to actively choose a banking relationship - as all the banks are NPCs no difference will exist and interest will not have to be paid on accounts. 8. Player Corporation debt issues. The framework for private debt issues have been created, however private issues are much more complex than the ones of the state and it raises following concerns which need to be dealt with: A genuine need for public money are needed. Almost anything in EVE are not more expensive than a dedicated player can earn the money fairly easy. In RL public money are needed because no single individual (excluding maybe the richest families on the planet) will be able to fund and operate their own car factory or large ship yard. Covenants GÇô as it has been raised early in the thread, No investor protection exist in EVE. This will have to change. 9. Player corporation equity issues (IPOs). 10. Most of my ideas here are based on the foundation that Eve players (corps) should have the freedom to pursue the career they want. Hence Player customers should always have a choice between expensive NPC goods and services or Player operated industries which can offer better and cheaper products if they are well managed. Final remark will be that if a FX system gets to complicated to implement due to CCP programming costs or lack of liquidity the rest of the steps would be achievable anyhow.
Sorry, after the first paragraph or two, I didn't see any mention of what purpose they serve. Who is the large organization seeking to take on debt in order to finance short term? who has the ability to control money supply to pay back the bonds?
This looks like a solution without a problem. If you really wanted to try it, having the NPC corps offer you the chance to buy bonds, pay dividends based on taxes, and have it take from the same pool bounties do (which there isnt one ATM) etc. and recirculate the money woul work, but you'd have to have a group basically act like a central bank, setting the payout.
And the best part? None of this encourages gameplay on any level at all. http://eveplex.blogspot.ca/ - station trading in commodities exchange |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 15:59:00 -
[97] - Quote
Let me start defining GÇ£Risk FreeGÇ¥ for all of you: In Finance GÇ£Risk Free rate/bond/indexGÇ¥ typically refers to securities backed by a sovereign state. In theory this means that the sovereign will always repay principal and interest with absolute certainty because they can print the domestic currency in unlimited amounts. However it do not mean that it is risk free to hold these securities. Even when held to maturity they still hold Risks such as Inflation and Currency risk.
Loraine Gess wrote:Bonds become available by EVE bank, secured by CCP. There is no risk. The bond is for 1m each, with a payout of 1%.
Your post is from the beginning flawed as you state GÇ£There is no riskGÇ¥.
Loraine Gess wrote:I invest 100b into bonds immediately. This provides me with 100,000 bonds. Each one pays me 10,000 isk upon maturity. Each maturity date I earn 1% compounding, or 1b after the first one. Let's be generous using the OP's original numbers and say the maturity is for one month (a ridiculous ~12.5% per annum, risk-free). It is now possible for me to quit eve, sans logging in once a month, and continue to train my character and stay subscribed - indefinitely.
No where in my post I have argued, implied or expected a monthly interest of 1%. So where do you get this number from?
Loraine Gess wrote:That is, of course, assuming PLEX prices stay the same. But why would they? There are EVE trillionaires. They're earning 10b/month. Do they plex 1 account? Do they plex 10 or less?
You assume PLEX prices would stay the same GÇô If PLEX prices stay the same, it would most likely indicate a very low inflation which again imply a very low bond yield. This contradict your 1% monthly yield scenario.
Loraine Gess wrote:Let's say this EVE trillionaire, named Chribbbbbba, who does not own several titans, decides to invest half of his wealth to forever play this game. He no longer has to do any work to stay in the game, nor pay money from his bank account. Every month he pulls a magical 5b out of his ass. Within two years he can afford an extra titan at pre-bond prices. He's earning a spank ~7% per annum for doing nothing. Oh and did we mention this scales infinitely?
Regading GÇ£ChribbbbbbaGÇ¥ : As stated above the securities will face inflation risk, this means that if Chribbbba invest half his wealth in government bonds he is no way guaranteed that he can play this game forever. The bonds are NOT a hedge against PLEX inflation (or ISK depreciation). A valid question to raise is: will Chribbbbba be better off investing half his wealth in CCP bonds and then buy PLEX as time passes GÇô or would he get more PLEX using half his wealth today buying PLEX and then store them? Or will the bond yield (- transaction costs) be higher than PLEX inflation? Loraine Gess clearly think so, however I have not seen any evidence supporting his ultra aggressive statement.
Loraine Gess wrote:But wait! OP says! We'll just double isk bounties, PVE will be revived!
I never said such things GÇô please refrain from making statements on my behalf.
Regarding uptake and money supply: You are mixing up concepts GÇô Total wealth is normally defined as value of total assets GÇô value of total liabilities. So it is completely unrealistic that you assume 25% of total EVE wealth can be invested in CCP bonds. What system are you referring to which will increase the money supply by 3.2%? How can you state that people are losing 3% of their income to inflation? Who are GÇ£peopleGÇ¥ and are you just guessing on the number? To be fair this entire chapter and the rest of your post do not make any sense as you are mixing up concepts.
|

RAW23
738
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 15:59:00 -
[98] - Quote
Far Wanderer wrote:RAW23 wrote:Ah - I see you are a veritable fountain of terrible ideas that demand unnecessary CCP interference in the game. I fully understand your attraction to this thread now. Laying out bait to get the thread closed, eh? Bye bye now. 
I really don't care if the thread stays open or closed. It is the home for many terrible arguments but that doesn't seem a reason to close it. It is still beyond me why an ISD would reopen it nine months after it initially closed though and your explanation that it is still frequently linked to hasn't been substantiated yet.
By the way, if you are intent on avoiding the kind of exchanges that lead to threads being locked, might I suggested you leave your 'HTFUs' and 'GTFOs' at home? There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:07:00 -
[99] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:ISK seems to be balanced, thus your rational for change doesn't seem to exist.
CSM8 - August 2013 Summit Minutes
Dr. EyjoG said...
The next graph showed the money supply. Overall, the money supply is evening out--changes to systems have reduced the ISK supply, so average ISK in active wallets is stable as of November 2012 and the maximum amount may even be peaking. While Mike points out that the leveling-out at the top of the graph is very short, Dr. EyjoG responded that it was the first plateau visible at all. Sinks and faucets are fairly balanced right now, with a bit more faucet than sink to allow for economic growth.
------
Look at the last bit again: "with a bit more faucet than sink to allow for economic growth"
Further, even countries like Singapore who have balanced budgets by law still issue government bonds (in all major tenors) to support the market with the "risk-free" index. *Money raised by government debt issuance in Singapore are only used for investments.
Additional the rational behind my suggestion was never aimed at balanced books or money supply. These were merely additional benefits. The main retaional was to expand the sandbox and eventually allow a player operated debt market to function.
|

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:28:00 -
[100] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:Creation of a "risk free" rate.
In order to value all other financial products in Eve, a risk free rate is essential. I like the idea of adding a bond market to the game.
I don't like the concept of "risk free."
You can't have EVE without risk. Substantial risk. Sometimes even losing all your ISK risk.
What are the ways you can think of that players can influence--even temporarily halt--the bond market you're proposing?
Should the value of bonds instead be tied to stations? Such that the value of a bond is linked to the "value" of a station in terms of market activity in and out, ore reprocessing and all other activities where players pay a fee to the station and otherwise conduct their business there?
If players don't invest in bonds in an NPC station, could a station degrade over time (i.e. start to lose or close services like Medical Facilities)?
Can there be bond rates based on other factors? The value of a solar system, constellation, region?
It seems to me that the wider the area the more reliable a bond should be, whereas the smaller an area the less reliable.
Likewise, the rate of return should be smaller for a larger area, but bigger (and more volatile) for a smaller area.
Right before bonds are due, could there be mission arcs or faction warfare scenarios where players can try to sink the value of bonds "for the other side"?
Sort of a way for one large group to mess with the wallets (or rather, the bond returns) for other player's wallets? Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. --Azual Skoll |

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2088
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:40:00 -
[101] - Quote
Holy necrophiles batman ....
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 16:45:00 -
[102] - Quote
Ester Hughes wrote:Sorry, after the first paragraph or two, I didn't see any mention of what purpose they serve. Who is the large organization seeking to take on debt in order to finance short term? who has the ability to control money supply to pay back the bonds?
This looks like a solution without a problem. If you really wanted to try it, having the NPC corps offer you the chance to buy bonds, pay dividends based on taxes, and have it take from the same pool bounties do (which there isnt one ATM) etc. and recirculate the money woul work, but you'd have to have a group basically act like a central bank, setting the payout.
And the best part? None of this encourages gameplay on any level at all.
I want to create the foundation for a functioning private debt market. And since one of the best ways to value debt is: "Risk-free" index + Risks (credit risk, liquidity risk, covenants, market risk etc) It would be natural to create the risk-free index first.
I completly disagree with you last paragraph. Many players in eve love Market PVP and expanding the sandbox and making EVE a more advanced financial game would be a huge gameplay improvement to many.
There are countless threads in the forum where people demand a stock market or investment opportunities alike |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
791
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:10:00 -
[103] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:So let me ask those people, do you find it fair, not to get compensated for not having access to your money for a period of time? and do you not believe in Cost of Capital? The real world works this way and I believe it would be beneficial to Eve if they adopted similar standards. Communism is gone so lets adopt the economic principles from the free world. If we in the future would like to see a liberalised EVE banking sector, maybe even private player operated banks and free economy standards this suggestion is one small step in the right direction. It will set standards for cost of capital and bring awareness to players of financial issues into the game.
The real world works this way because people invented an artificial economic system then exported it around the world. It was only one of many economic systems that could have been chosen and in different times and places in human history many systems have been used. The idea that money is created as debt by private banks in virtually unlimited amounts and then used primarily in the creation of asset bubbles rather than R+D or manufacturing is in itself wildly bizarre and i applaud anyone including CCP that uses a different system. In any case Eve is about player created structures using the toys in the sandbox. CCP created several ways for players to create new currency (this bizarrely includes creating isk when spaceships blow up) as well as ways to remove isk from the game. many players have set up banks /ponzi schemes in the past. The debt market is alive and well in this very subforum. Player run secure 3rd party services all exist. I see nothing in your suggestion that fixes any problems or would make the game any better.
I don't see how the cost of capital in any way applies when individual players have hundreds of billions in their personal wallets doing nothing. Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85 |

Batelle
HOMELE55
2176
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:24:00 -
[104] - Quote
This entire idea is ludicrous and out of place in an economy built on currency faucents, currency sinks. CCP doesn't need to accept bonds, becuase they don't need to borrow isk for any reason, because the game is based on faucets and sinks. Furthermore, why would i ever invest isk in a real person ie on this forum if I can get a risk free return somewhere else? "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
2292
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:33:00 -
[105] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:I want to create the foundation for a functioning private debt market. And since one of the best ways to value debt is: "Risk-free" index + Risks (credit risk, liquidity risk, covenants, market risk etc) It would be natural to create the risk-free index first.
This is literally nonsense. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Batelle
HOMELE55
2178
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 17:36:00 -
[106] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Alexander wulfgard wrote:I want to create the foundation for a functioning private debt market. And since one of the best ways to value debt is: "Risk-free" index + Risks (credit risk, liquidity risk, covenants, market risk etc) It would be natural to create the risk-free index first. This is literally nonsense.
Claims to want to promote a private market for debt.
Proposes a system that would squeeze or obsolete player-offered bond offerings by having NPCs offer a zero-risk version of the same. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
985

|
Posted - 2014.03.10 22:58:00 -
[107] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued.
ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:16:00 -
[108] - Quote
Far Wanderer wrote:Alexander wulfgard wrote:Creation of a "risk free" rate.
In order to value all other financial products in Eve, a risk free rate is essential. I like the idea of adding a bond market to the game. I don't like the concept of "risk free." You can't have EVE without risk. Substantial risk. Sometimes even losing all your ISK risk. What are the ways you can think of that players can influence--even temporarily halt--the bond market you're proposing? Should the value of bonds instead be tied to stations? Such that the value of a bond is linked to the "value" of a station in terms of market activity in and out, ore reprocessing and all other activities where players pay a fee to the station and otherwise conduct their business there? If players don't invest in bonds in an NPC station, could a station degrade over time (i.e. start to lose or close services like Medical Facilities)? Likewise if player activity is halted, for however long, could this have an effect on the station and its bonds? Can there be bond rates based on other factors? The value of a solar system, constellation, region? It seems to me that the wider the area the more reliable a bond should be, whereas the smaller an area the less reliable. Likewise, the rate of return should be smaller for a larger area, but bigger (and more volatile) for a smaller area. Right before bonds are due, could there be mission arcs or faction warfare scenarios where players can try to sink the value of bonds "for the other side"? Sort of a way for one large group to mess with the wallets (or rather, the bond returns) for other player's wallets?
Let me first say that I admire you for your alternative career path in Eve. You create content and fun beyond the normal boundaries of the game. But as stated earlier the GÇ£risk free index/rateGÇ¥ do not mean you avoid all risks. It simply refers to the fact that the security does not hold default Risk.
The benefits of creating a GÇ£risk free rateGÇ¥ are: 1. Fairly easy for CCPs programmers to implement and later the same framework could be used for more securities (including player issues). 2. It raises awareness amongst players for capital market investments. 3. It creates a benchmark which other assets and liabilities will be valued against. 4. Its a system which is more realistic and closer to RL solutions.
A form of asset backed municipal bond linked to faction ware fare is an interesting suggestion. And if you want other forms of securities created, first step will be to create this CCP bond. Later when players or municipals wants to issue other debt securities it will be much easier to implant as game mechanics and investor awareness already exists.
|

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:25:00 -
[109] - Quote
Batelle wrote: Furthermore, why would i ever invest isk in a real person ie on this forum if I can get a risk free return somewhere else?
Because the real person would have to pay a much higher rate than what a CCP bond would yield.
The yield on a player issued bond will be higher because of:
1. Default Risk 2. Low recovery rate on defaults due to Zero investor protection and functioning court system 3. No enforcements of covenats 4. Higher Liquidty Risk 5. Higher Market Risk +++
This means that any rational investor would demand a much higher yield ! |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:28:00 -
[110] - Quote
Varius Xeral wrote:Alexander wulfgard wrote:I want to create the foundation for a functioning private debt market. And since one of the best ways to value debt is: "Risk-free" index + Risks (credit risk, liquidity risk, covenants, market risk etc) It would be natural to create the risk-free index first. This is literally nonsense.
Why donGÇÖt you enlighten us and tell us how you believe a bond is valued? |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:43:00 -
[111] - Quote
Batelle wrote: Claims to want to promote a private market for debt.
Proposes a system that would squeeze or obsolete player-offered bond offerings by having NPCs offer a zero-risk version of the same.
CCP issued securities are a different product than the bonds which currently exist in EVE. Instead I believe the change of game mechanics and increased investor awareness would help player issuances and create more demand for their bonds.
1. Game mechanics will allow bonds to be traded via eve market which many will find much more compelling than going through other channels like the forum. 2. Investors can now value player bonds better due to the creation of the GÇ£risk free rateGÇ¥. Better valuation = less risk = lower- yield & spread = more volume 3. Increased investor awareness will get more EVE citizens to invest in player offerings and hence increase demand for such bonds. |

Bi-Mi Lansatha
HIFI INDUSTRIAL The Kadeshi
284
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 11:20:00 -
[112] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:...The main retaional was to expand the sandbox and eventually allow a player operated debt market to function... Isn't the biggest issue with player operated debt now accountability?
For example, if I started a 'bank' today; and had thousands of people invest trillions of ISK... tomorrow I could just steal it all. I could sell or recycle this character and disappear... or just keep this character and there wouldn't be any recourse for those cheated to recover their money.
In a game, like EvE, in which deceit and deception are such an integral parts... how do you overcome this issue? |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 16:48:00 -
[113] - Quote
Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote:Isn't the biggest issue with player operated debt now accountability?
For example, if I started a 'bank' today; and had thousands of people invest trillions of ISK... tomorrow I could just steal it all. I could sell or recycle this character and disappear... or just keep this character and there wouldn't be any recourse for those cheated to recover their money.
In a game, like EvE, in which deceit and deception are such an integral parts... how do you overcome this issue?
Yes, I agree
I have only briefly touched this area in some of the post earlier in the thread. Fact is that EVE is a world full of Alts, No civil courts or justice system. Characters only face reputational risk which may be bypassed via character selling or sending to biomass. So the real difficult question is; How can we increase investor protection enough for a genuine effective player operated capital market to develop?
Disclaimer: This topic is slightly out of my area of expertise and full of in-game mechanic pitfalls. I therefore will not give any GÇ£hardGÇ¥ advice but merely soft suggestions. I also recommend anyone with knowledge and interest of this topic to participate in the discussion.
1. As stated in the beginning of the thread under 8) GÇ£A genuine need for public money is neededGÇ¥. I suggest CCP develop a farms & field concept where corporations will need to invest heavily into infrastructure in order to create player operated industries.
2. Who can raise money? In the OTC market everyone can participate exactly how it is today. But if you wish to raise money through EVE Market (which acts as the exchange and regulator) rules will apply.
3. Skills: In order to get your bonds listed the CEO + some Directors will need some skills trained to 5. It could for example be a Finance, Corporate Finance and Capital Market Theory.
4. Information: The issuer is recommended to write a business plan which will be attached to the bond (in the GÇ£infoGÇ¥ tab in-game) and required to open a thread about their IPO in the EVE forum (a new forum channel dedicated to IPOs). The public should also have access to various statistics about the company such as: Money and assets currently held, Income, Expenses, time members have logged on while in corp, skill points accumulated while in corp perhaps via some sort of API key.
5. Pay a non-refundable fee upfront (to a NPC investment bank for the listing service) If the issuance is under-subscribed the IPO will be cancelled and the listing fee lost
6.Bond Covenats: I suggest a list of predefined covenants which the bond issuer can agree or not agree to prior to the Bond IPO (and this information will be available to investors and the public), Examples; The corp will not be able to transfer or spend more than X mio ISK per X days. The corp MUST invest X mio ISK into a Player Operated Complex within X days. All T1 (industrial/freighter) (frigs/crus/bc/bs) ships must be insured at all time. Must have minimum X characters, X skill points in corp Must have minimum X mio in revenue per X days Must have minimum X mio worth of equipment/ships in corporate hangars
7. Collateral GÇô The bond issuer can decide to put down assets as collateral:
7.1 Ships GÇô the CEO will have full access to ships put down as collateral, but he will not be able to sell them through EVE Market. Further I suggest all ships held as collateral will get a unique id number. If the corp defaults all ships held under collateral will be repossessed if docked. None-docked ships will get a permanent criminal status and repossessed if they dock.
7.2 Sovereign structures GÇô at default all sovereign structures will be dismantled and repossessed 7.3 POCs GÇô will be liquidated and any recovered money will be paid out to the bond holders 7.4 Characters GÇô Perhaps the CEO or Directors should be able to put down their Character as collateral.
All items Repossessed should be instantly transferred to Jita and sold. However the proceedings from the sale should be subject to a deduction representing transaction-, repossessing and transport costs. Perhaps 25% for High-sec; 50% for Low and 75% for Null
Default GÇô If a corporate fails to pay either principal/interest when due or break any covenants on the bonds, will constitute a legal default and the bondholders will have prior legal claim over shareholders to all assets held by the corporate. In other words the CEO will be fired (all characters in the corp kicked to a NPC corp) and the bondholders would receive the proceedings from the fire sale of all corporate assets. In the event that the proceedings from the sale surpass those of the bond principal, exceeding funds will be divided amongst the shareholders. |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
179
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:04:00 -
[114] - Quote
A system like that can still be gamed, use a worthless figurehead CEO character, take down anything in space, etc. just before you default. .
|

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 19:45:00 -
[115] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:A system like that can still be gamed, use a worthless figurehead CEO character, take down anything in space, etc. just before you default.
This system was never intended to be bulletproof - just like IRL However the majority of scammers will not be able to launch a successful bond issue. Scammers will also need to invest considerable time and effort in order to pull it off. |

Scion Lex
Tungsten Carbonide Asset Management
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 01:31:00 -
[116] - Quote
There is no such thing as bullet proof. CCP will never behave as the SEC of EVE No player organization will ever have the leverage to be the SEC either All of this is a moot point IF we had a functional shares system ...and why you would want to centralize the financial sector of eve is beyond me.
...in short; NO.
|

Rainbow Dash
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
90
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 06:35:00 -
[117] - Quote
STOP BITING ON THE BAD TROLL |

Far Wanderer
Bank of Far
6
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 08:51:00 -
[118] - Quote
Alexander wulfgard wrote:Let me first say that I admire you for your alternative career path in Eve. You create content and fun beyond the normal boundaries of the game. Thank you. 
Alexander wulfgard wrote:But as stated earlier the GÇ£risk free index/rateGÇ¥ do not mean you avoid all risks. It simply refers to the fact that the security does not hold default Risk. To be honest, I don't understand all of the technical words you're using. I think I understand what you mean about no default Risk, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
I just think there ought to be some inherent risk, even in with NPC-issued bonds.
Alexander wulfgard wrote:A form of asset backed municipal bond linked to faction ware fare is an interesting suggestion. Thank you again.
I think it would be interesting if you could bet on faction warfare. Much like a hedge fund trader. It seems to me like there are enough big ISK players in EVE that if they could influence faction war outcomes for a payoff, they'd do it. (Who knows, maybe they already do?)
Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. --Azual Skoll |

Alexander wulfgard
Modulated Dreams Against ALL Authorities
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 09:11:00 -
[119] - Quote
Scion Lex wrote:There is no such thing as bullet proof. CCP will never behave as the SEC of EVE No player organization will ever have the leverage to be the SEC either
No where in my post have I argued for CCP or Players to take the regulator role.
I believe all rules and covenats should be hard (objective) and machine readable to ensure no human interaction. These will then become the game rules of EVE Capital Market.
Scion Lex wrote: All of this is a moot point IF we had a functional shares system
Why do you want to create a share market before a credit market?
Equity is the MOST junior class of investors in assets GÇô and typically also one of the most expensive. RL corporations will typically ensure most of their needed funding via other sources than Equity fx: Syndicated loans, bank loan accounts or debt, supplier liabilities and Corporate Bonds. To skip all other forms of finance and rush towards one of the most advanced forms is not sensible.
Finally you will face the same problems trying to create a Equity market as you will with a Credit market. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
992

|
Posted - 2014.03.12 22:23:00 -
[120] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post.
The rules: 26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |