Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
163
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 16:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
we are curious to know the direction you guys are thinking about taking marauders. exploration? t2 hac bs? worm hole survivability? scanning/probing? jump drive style capital support? reconn extension into bs? salvage king?
we keep posting kewl ideas with no response (i know yer busy), but if u guys gave us a general direction that you're leaning towards, we can gear comments that way and possibly provide assistance.
they have been broke for 7 years and we dont want to deal with another 7. so, we wanna help. thats all..=) |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 18:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
pretty please CCP ..., ah go on ... ah go on.. go on.. go on... go on!!!!!!! ah i love a bit of Father Ted 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
PavlikX
You are in da lock
73
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 18:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Indeed. |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
355
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October. |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October.
They haven't got too haulers and pirate ships yet. 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
167
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October. i appreciate you chiming in, but i am just wondering the direction they are considering. i dont want them to think for months and post something and then one of us comes up with a better direction and they have to reconsider it and delay things is all.
is it exploration? assault? are we going to make it a t2 battleship/hauler/roid ganker with x-large t2 capital strip miners and a 10 m3 cargo bay?
just an idea of the direction they are taking it is all i am asking.. a little skuttlebutt. rumors from the water cooler. please alvatore, go sit in on one of the meetings and pick their brain..=)
|
Hakaimono
Stillwater Corporation That Escalated Quickly
159
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
If they raise sensor strength, they might nerf everything else. Although I do like the idea of them being WH dedicated. |
Jureth22
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
93
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jonas Sukarala wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October. They haven't got too haulers and pirate ships yet.
true.sansha ships need a buff like theres no tommorow.just a short fact : i have seen a succubus once in so many years of playing.and the last one i seen was like 3 years ago or 4.not to mention phantasm.nightmares are being used,but they are also pretty rare to spot.
blood : cruor is just meh.i have seen one last year and he died too fast.ashimmu is meh aswell.bhaalgorn is good but that needs a look at aswell
guristas : worm : i have never seen one in space.gila is ok`ish.rattlesnake is good too.but the problem with these ships are mainly drones.i have 12m sp in drones and i cant say i`m happy with them.they are just too easy to kill and vulnerable.the only advantage they have is that if you ship gets jammed,they will keep firing
serpentis : daredevils are common,vigilants are ok`ish.vindi is good,but it just doesnt feel like being a high end battleship.
angel : dramiel is just awfull after the nerf it had a while back.cynabal is good but lacks capacitor.mach has the same capacitor problem.
but then again.thats just my opinion. |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
167
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:35:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jureth22 wrote:Jonas Sukarala wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October. They haven't got too haulers and pirate ships yet. true.sansha ships need a buff like theres no tommorow.just a short fact : i have seen a succubus once in so many years of playing.and the last one i seen was like 3 years ago or 4.not to mention phantasm.nightmares are being used,but they are also pretty rare to spot. blood : cruor is just meh.i have seen one last year and he died too fast.ashimmu is meh aswell.bhaalgorn is good but that needs a look at aswell guristas : worm : i have never seen one in space.gila is ok`ish.rattlesnake is good too.but the problem with these ships are mainly drones.i have 12m sp in drones and i cant say i`m happy with them.they are just too easy to kill and vulnerable.the only advantage they have is that if you ship gets jammed,they will keep firing serpentis : daredevils are common,vigilants are ok`ish.vindi is good,but it just doesnt feel like being a high end battleship. angel : dramiel is just awfull after the nerf it had a while back.cynabal is good but lacks capacitor.mach has the same capacitor problem. but then again.thats just my opinion. oooh kewl pirate ship posts in a marauder thread. i love it. =\ |
PavlikX
You are in da lock
73
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
I guess that CSs will be rebalanced first amongst the t2ships. Probably next expansion will have mentioned CS, pirate ships rebalances, improvements of Odyssey rebalance and new navy BSs (ex-tier3). I doubt that we will see reworked marauders soon. But still, CCP must give more discussion with T2 generation then T1. |
|
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:Jureth22 wrote:Jonas Sukarala wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:With the exception of some possible minor adjustments to T1 ships, T2 are up for rebalancing now that Tiericide is over. They'll start with T2 frigates and move upward through the ship sizes just like they did with T1 ships. Don't expect any mention of T2 battleships before October. They haven't got too haulers and pirate ships yet. true.sansha ships need a buff like theres no tommorow.just a short fact : i have seen a succubus once in so many years of playing.and the last one i seen was like 3 years ago or 4.not to mention phantasm.nightmares are being used,but they are also pretty rare to spot. blood : cruor is just meh.i have seen one last year and he died too fast.ashimmu is meh aswell.bhaalgorn is good but that needs a look at aswell guristas : worm : i have never seen one in space.gila is ok`ish.rattlesnake is good too.but the problem with these ships are mainly drones.i have 12m sp in drones and i cant say i`m happy with them.they are just too easy to kill and vulnerable.the only advantage they have is that if you ship gets jammed,they will keep firing serpentis : daredevils are common,vigilants are ok`ish.vindi is good,but it just doesnt feel like being a high end battleship. angel : dramiel is just awfull after the nerf it had a while back.cynabal is good but lacks capacitor.mach has the same capacitor problem. but then again.thats just my opinion. oooh kewl pirate ship posts in a marauder thread. i love it. =\
derailing threads ...i love it :P 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
167
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
Hakaimono wrote:If they raise sensor strength, they might nerf everything else. Although I do like the idea of them being WH dedicated. unless they get rid of rat jamming (which i do not like the idea of (military moto...train like u fight, fight like you train-meaning how ever you practice is exactly how you will perform under fire, so if we have jamming in the belts, incursinos, worm holes and everywhere we look, when our new guys get in pvp, they will know exactly how to respond) they will need to do something about the sensor strength.
if its a t2 ship which has an additional 10x multiplier on top of the 8x for bs (and all the other requirements) it should NOT be gimped. in my opinion, the t2 should be more powerful than pirate because u have to train longer and harder to get in them. t1 is what they had, then they made navy (upgraded version of t1). then, the pirates got ahold of them and modified them in different directions (but they are still t1 base ships). after they made everything and then pirates modified them, we stepped back and found new materials and new directions to go...introducing t2 (which should be superior to t1 in every way).
they should lock better, fly faster, hit harder, tank more and just be a general bad ass...unless they were made for cloaky stuff. (thats my impression of how things should have went anyway).
now fastfoward to today: the marauders and commands were made 7 years ago. eve has changed directions almost completely in that time. why keep a ship stuck in the past when it can be modified a little and sent in a new direction? they dont need to gimp anything. according to the presentation in iceland during fanfest, they said they want to give us the ships and see how we play with them, not dictate how they will be. by telling us that the marauders are PVE ONLY is in direct conflict with what they are saying and the direction we as eve are heading.
i dont forsee them being gimped. i just want to know the direction so we can help a little in the design phase. take ownership of this game instead of just playing. |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
167
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 19:55:00 -
[13] - Quote
PavlikX wrote:I guess that CSs will be rebalanced first amongst the t2ships. Probably next expansion will have mentioned CS, pirate ships rebalances, improvements of Odyssey rebalance and new navy BSs (ex-tier3). I doubt that we will see reworked marauders soon. But still, CCP must give more discussion with T2 generation then T1. discussion WOULD BE appreciated. for those of us who have been around for 7-10 years, we feel like family. we're not some nooblets here (some of us) and we just wanna help and be involved.
|
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
6420
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease: Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
229
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease:
you minge teasing bastard ya :P i love a bit of bo selecta
seriously though give us a hint 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
169
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:09:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease: first off, i am humbled that you would reply! 2nd YOU SUCK FOR NOT TELLIN!!!! =) 3rd im the size of a bear you've heard the rule dont feed the bears? (insert "tease the bears" here too)
=)
yer KILLIN me fozzie =)
side note-i REALLY like what you guys have done so far so i have NO doubts we will like em, but damn it, the suspense is killin me...=) my fav 2 ships (cmd and marauders) are getting a make over and u wont let us even hear rumor??? UUUUUGGGHHH
=)
sigh ok, i will let this post die (and ask again tomorrow)
wait, have you seen some of the posts with marauder ideas? there has been some pretty kewl ones...(in case u guys were really busy with odessy)..
give us a hint. PUUULEEEEASE! exploration? hac? reconn? t2 orca with small pulse lasers that fire rockets? |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
4564
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:21:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease:
This wont light off a multitude of speculation threads at all. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
273
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease: This wont light off a multitude of speculation threads at all. Fozzie: "What do you guys think about Marauders?" Dev team: "Yeah, we need to have a look at them."
* * *
Fozzie: "We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but..."
|
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
dont scare him away guy, im trying to bait him in. the trap is laid and everything.. sshhhhh
lol |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1091
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 20:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease:
f
u
c k
thats a tease and a half... There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |
|
Kane Fenris
NWP
30
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 21:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease:
sugestion:
dislike forum post button |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Aegis Solaris
1966
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 21:59:00 -
[22] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease: Can mount:
Capital guns http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |
Verity Sovereign
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
459
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 23:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Suggestion: Role Bonus: Immunity to non-targeted interdiction
Marauder Skill bonus: +1 Warp strength per level * one other bonus per skill level
Now it can really "maraud" behind enemy lines
Also, get rid of that weak sensor strength.
They're not more susceptible to: Turret disruption Sensor damping target painting So why should they be more vulnerable to Caldari ewar?
It would be great for low/null sec PvE |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
358
|
Posted - 2013.06.14 23:38:00 -
[24] - Quote
I have always hated how a supposedly more advanced ship has weaker electronics. Sensor strength should be the same as T1, not worse. |
To mare
Advanced Technology
197
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 00:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:We're working on a pretty cool concept for them but it's too early to announce anything.
:ultra tease: i just hope its not like the great ideas you had for the rifter wich turned out to be 1 extra pg |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction Whores in space
420
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 00:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
They gonna make ships focused on FOrum Pvp. They will be able to gank forum posts. |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
171
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 01:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
hey, im a rank 5 forum pvper.. thats why i said earlier that i have a hic lying in wait...=)
bubble up! |
Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon Drunk 'n' Disorderly
713
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 02:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
better not include leaving them as battleships with frigate sensor strength, which just get outclassed by pirate BSes |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
359
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 03:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
They'll still be more-or-less outclassed by Pirate BCs in terms of raw improvement over T1. They may, however, finally be good at something better than anything else is good at it. |
Mole Guy
Xoth Inc Unclaimed.
171
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 03:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
outclasses is relative. outclasses in raw dps? maybe, but if they arent dps mongers, then revert to my original statement.
i dig t2 stuff. pirate is ok, but im an amarr lover through and through. i dig khanid short range missile boats. i could go caldari, but its not amarr..=)
i just think it needs a role. its own role.
and @fozzie, damnit, i think we need to know. =)
at least a direction. (and something other than north...lol) =)
_GûâGûäGûàGûêGûêGûàGûäGûâ__ GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûê GûêGûê_GèÖ_Gûê_GèÖ_GûêGûê GûêGûêGûêGûê_Gûê_GûêGûêGûêGûêGûê GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûê Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê_Gûê GûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûêGûê Silence, I Keel you ! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |