| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:13:00 -
[271] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Yes, CCP should abandon their secure market niche, throw their exisiting playerbase under as bus and join the long line of MMO publishers who have struck rich by trying to copy Wow, such as and of course and let's not forget
After all, what company with 10% YoY growth wouldn't hasten to trash their business plan to try and start copying a model which is losing 20% a year.
Not saying you should copy WOW... at all.. I've never been to the website...
I think they have like 9 Million Subscribers who are actually paying each month to play though. That seems like a lot of money! I wonder why so many people are into that game? Forget for a moment that it had 12 million at it's peak.....
That's right because people can play against other players, die and re-spawn to play again without such a high cost of reentry. They can level up their character and have a level 80 dude roaming around town, if that level 80 dude gets jumped - no biggie - he respawns and ALL this gear he worked so hard for is maintained.... just needs to repair it or something.
In EVE, sure you can have a 150M SP dude, jump in a T3 -2Billion ISK rig, but don't think for a minute you're going to keep it!!! Nope, in a moment of Glory, that rig is toast... So you have to pluck down $50 buck or grind to get it back over the course of days or weeks if you don't have EVE as a Job..... That my friend is only ONE PVP experience where you lost your battle..... If you want it cheaper, your 150M SP dude has to play like a level 1 player and jump in a T1 frigate ... okay!
The cost to play against other players is too high, and the content of the game is vastly going towards being only available in PVP areas.
|

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15038
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:20:00 -
[272] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Of course I use PLEX to sub my accounts.... why in the world would I pay real money to play this game if I don't have to?
That is my point.... the payment system is a fail due to this.
I don't have to buy PLEX with Real Money because I have 50 billion ISK from playing the game. I've cancelled all my sub accounts and they are on a PLEX payment type now, if I want to reactivate one, I just buy a PLEX in market.... this should not be possible! How is CCP getting more money per month from the Plex, fail exactly?
Just because you are not spending RL monies, doesn't mean others are not. Just how do you think a Plex comes into existence?
Oh and people trade existing ISK for the Plex. It does not create ISK when traded.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:29:00 -
[273] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Franco Stein wrote:Of course I use PLEX to sub my accounts.... why in the world would I pay real money to play this game if I don't have to?
That is my point.... the payment system is a fail due to this.
I don't have to buy PLEX with Real Money because I have 50 billion ISK from playing the game. I've cancelled all my sub accounts and they are on a PLEX payment type now, if I want to reactivate one, I just buy a PLEX in market.... this should not be possible! How is CCP getting more money per month from the Plex, fail exactly? Just because you are not spending RL monies, doesn't mean others are not. Just how do you think a Plex comes into existence? Oh and people trade existing ISK for the Plex. It does not create ISK when traded.
It amazes me how people don't get how PLEX is born. When I first stared playing I bought GTC's (Game Time Codes) from one of CCP vendors.. I did so to get my head start as most do, because I am greedy and lazy!
1) Real Money gets thrown down to a Vendor for a Game Time Code of 2 months of play time for $35. 2) I then take that cool time code and offer it in the TimeCode Bazaar (now they've made it easier and can just turn it into 2 PLEX in game). At the time I did it, I think I got like $450 million ISK per .... 3) PLEX is then sold on the market for ISK, which in turn I can if I want to - Buy GEAR without earning it in game.
This is a fail, because it's supposed to be a game...not a "Buy my Rig" and see how I do against the hugely entrenched PVP base "Simulator".
EVE is certainly a niche, but not in a good way....
Edit = I see you were be sarcastic there... my bad.... you already know the scam....sorry! |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
317
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:32:00 -
[274] - Quote
Ecks Khan wrote:So everyone should start petitioning CCP to buff crime, as it will have the great effect of of keeping Wow players out.
Sounds good to me.
CCP would probably reduce it if they want to grab the strays before they get established in another MMO. If they get established in another MMO they're not leaving for a long time. Which is what older MMOs prefer, as those bitter vets aren't going to stay forever in EvE, too. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Sir Mack Inawrex
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:35:00 -
[275] - Quote
"[/i]Other games have much larger subscription bases, due to the player retention. They just have a reason for the player to come back and want to play. EVE just doesn't have that kind of content or interest for most gamers. It's just too harsh![/i]"
That's an issue with the game's core game design principals, not the PLEX system. CCP have always intended EvE to appeal to a niche market, the game's harsh ruleset will put off many players thoughout its entire lifetime. |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
139
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:35:00 -
[276] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Six Six Six wrote:Franco Stein wrote:I have had up to 8 accounts running at the same time in the past.. Now I have 3, and might just plex my main for a few years in case I play again. In any regard .... as I said.
So using PLEX is ok for you but a cheat for everyone else? Of course I use PLEX to sub my accounts.... why in the world would I pay real money to play this game if I don't have to? That is my point.... the payment system is a fail due to this. I don't have to buy PLEX with Real Money because I have 50 billion ISK from playing the game. I've cancelled all my sub accounts and they are on a PLEX payment type now, if I want to reactivate one, I just buy a PLEX in market.... this should not be possible! 1) I don't need to Pay anymore because I am amazing and entrenched. 2) Friends won't play because PVP is too harsh and they get no reward for their hour or two of play time. PLEX on the flip side has killed the game..... and turned it in to Entropia for many many players. The reason this game will never be more than the very vocal limited player base... is due to PLEX. This isn't a JOB folks..... it's a game and even though it has a GREAT potential to be amazing, it sucks due to the very high cost of PVP..... some of you think that's great if you have the RL cash or you're a full timer who has tons of ISK.. but to the rest of the world... it's just stupid. If you spend more than an hour or two playing this game a day... you are addicted and should quit for two full weeks. PS.. Forum PVP is way more fun than in game PVP..
I think you're just using PLEX as an excuse.
Continuing the subscription by using PLEX is not a goal of the game, people can make it a personal goal or they can choose to continue by paying a subscription that is a choice the player must make.
So people that choose to use isk to buy PLEX to extend their game time can't complain that their isk is going on PLEX and leaving then sort where it comes to isk needed for PvP.
EVE is not a job but you can treat it as such if you so wish, again that is the player's choice. In fact for those selling the PLEX that they purchased form CCP they're actually avoiding treating the game as a job in part. Some like treating it like a job others don't I think PLEX works quite well in this respect.
Franco Stein wrote:some of you think that's great if you have the RL cash or you're a full timer who has tons of ISK.. but to the rest of the world... it's just stupid.
I'd say this comes back to your idea of it not being fair. Well the world isn't fair it never have been and probably never will be.
Anyway I have to go out, so I'll have to revisit this later. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
15293
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:37:00 -
[277] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:This is a fail, because it's supposed to be a game...not a "Buy my Rig" and see how I do against the hugely entrenched PVP base "Simulator". How does the ability to trade paid game time make the payment system fail? It seems to be a roaring success. And how does it turn it into not being a game any more?
Quote:EVE is certainly a niche, but not in a good way. EVE has long since crept out of the niche it once was in. Half a million subscribers and constant growth for ten years pretty much disqualifies it from that position. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5345
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:37:00 -
[278] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Malcanis wrote:Yes, CCP should abandon their secure market niche, throw their exisiting playerbase under as bus and join the long line of MMO publishers who have struck rich by trying to copy Wow, such as and of course and let's not forget
After all, what company with 10% YoY growth wouldn't hasten to trash their business plan to try and start copying a model which is losing 20% a year. Not saying you should copy WOW... at all.. I've never been to the website... I think they have like 9 Million Subscribers who are actually paying each month to play though. That seems like a lot of money! I wonder why so many people are into that game? Forget for a moment that it had 12 million at it's peak..... That's right because people can play against other players, die and re-spawn to play again without such a high cost of reentry. They can level up their character and have a level 80 dude roaming around town, if that level 80 dude gets jumped - no biggie - he respawns and ALL this gear he worked so hard for is maintained.... just needs to repair it or something.
Here is the problem I think Malcanis is trying to highlight though. What you give as an example is done do death and WoW is the only MMO, that has had such success with it and even it is losing subs constantly now. Everyone else has straight up failed miserably at achieving the same success. Every single one. So if a miracle happens and EVE is somehow transformed to follow the system you describe, what makes you think the result is the 1% chance of currently unreproduced huge success vs the 99% chance of almost certain failure? If you had the definite answer to that question, you'd propably one of the most wanted person in the world of online gaming. Tons of specialists have bet hundreds of millions on the fact, that they had the answer and they have all missed the mark.
Franco Stein wrote:In EVE, sure you can have a 150M SP dude, jump in a T3 -2Billion ISK rig, but don't think for a minute you're going to keep it!!! Nope, in a moment of Glory, that rig is toast... So you have to pluck down $50 buck or grind to get it back over the course of days or weeks if you don't have EVE as a Job..... That my friend is only ONE PVP experience where you lost your battle..... If you want it cheaper, your 150M SP dude has to play like a level 1 player and jump in a T1 frigate ... okay!
The cost to play against other players is too high, and the content of the game is vastly going towards being only available in PVP areas.
I have 50 Billion ISK, that took me a few years to earn playing every daily sometimes and other times not at all.... That means if I want to play at my mains level of game play, I could have only 50 loses - considering Implants, clone costs, decent ship to compete....etc..etc..
Your whole view of the situation is just weird. T1 frigates equal lvl1 players? Ridiculously expensive ships equal playing at high level? That just isn't how this game works. You're trying to force a linear progression level based game system to fit with one, that doesn't have levels or linear progression in that sense. The problem isn't the actual system, but you trying to force your incompatible gameview to a system, that functions in a different way. There is definitely a problem here, but it's a problem of false perception. That doesn't mean it's not real or harmful, but it means it isn't what you describe it to be.
|

Ecks Khan
Smokin Aces.
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:40:00 -
[279] - Quote
Ace Uoweme wrote:Ecks Khan wrote:So everyone should start petitioning CCP to buff crime, as it will have the great effect of of keeping Wow players out.
Sounds good to me.
CCP would probably reduce it if they want to grab the strays before they get established in another MMO. If they get established in another MMO they're not leaving for a long time. Which is what older MMOs prefer, as those bitter vets aren't going to stay forever in EvE, too.
Crime is what makes EvE special, it's what all the news stories about. I'm not a very good criminal, I did try a scam once and ended up paying out more than I made hehe. But crime, and things like piracy and ganking and scamming and such, these are the "spice of life" things of a game like this.
If the people behind EvE wanted it to be huge, why did they make a niche spaceship game to begin with? And why are people keen to discard things which have proved successful over the decade this MMO has existed? I believe everything has it's place and that it's ok to not like certain things, but it's players who should seek out games they like rather than trying to change cool games like EvE (and my favorite, Darkfall) to suit their gaming style. |

Sir Mack Inawrex
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
4
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:41:00 -
[280] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:[1) Real Money gets thrown down to a Vendor for a Game Time Code of 2 months of play time for $35. 2) I then take that cool time code and offer it in the TimeCode Bazaar (now they've made it easier and can just turn it into 2 PLEX in game). At the time I did it, I think I got like $450 million ISK per .... 3) PLEX is then sold on the market for ISK, which in turn I can if I want to - Buy GEAR without earning it in game.
This is a fail, because it's supposed to be a game...not a "Buy my Rig" and see how I do against the hugely entrenched PVP base "Simulator".
Why is it a fail? One party gets the ISK they want, the other gets play time they want from a resource they don't need. Both parties win and the ability to do so comes at the benefit of a greater number of subscriptions for CCP and less illegal RMT, which comes as a quality of life improvement for the rest of the player base.
Everybody wins. There is no fail in your explanation. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3266
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:43:00 -
[281] - Quote
Guy is upset because EVE isn't a cookie-cutter MMO. The guy who was sitting next to me in the first nullsec round table who had obviously not had a shower since before boarding his flight to Iceland, you really stank. You know who you are. |

Remiel Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
1537
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:47:00 -
[282] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Wrong. Universal health care does not a socialist country make. Having socialist aspects does not make a country socialist, because we also have capitalist aspects. Alright, I gave an example of a socialist trait adopted by Australia. Please give an example of a capitalist trait. Because what you are doing is, citing something without giving a proper example, and declaring victory in the discussion by virtue of what is, literally, the card you are holding behind your back while saying "trust me...". No. I'd like to see that card, so we can continue.
I gave you one. The incredible imbalance of wealth in the US. Not the fact that an imbalance exists, but the degree of that imbalance. I'm not holding any cards behind my back. The data itself is readily available and speaks volumes.
Quote:Quote:Hence why I said, if you want to witness a compromise, come to Australia. The reason why you're so stuck on being so wrong with everything you say and assume is your premise is false: that you think there can only be one or the other.
My premise remains sound. Australia is neither large enough, nor has existed for a period of time long enough in their current hybrid social philosophy to make a determination of the long term viability of such a society. The European nations alone have existed long enough in a "nation state" level of society to use them as a possible metric, but they are all socialists. You may be an example of it working right now, but that is no guarantor of the future. That is what I mean when I say that the experiment of a hybrid middle ground society remains unproven. Particularly given that you have yet to produce a valid one.
No, your premise that there is and can only be one or the other is unsound, because if your argument is only based on there being no guarantee for future sustainability, then surely you can see how that can apply to the current model of capitalism most prevalent in the US as well. You seem to think that there are only a few countries in the world that can act as an example of what works and what doesn't, so here's a question: if something works somewhere better than something else somewhere else right now, which one do you think has a better chance of being more successful in the future? In other words, if there is such a high degree of inequality in the US making the majority of the population worse off for it, but no such problem in Australia to the same degree, which one of those systems that is "working right now" is most likely to be sustainable?
Additionally, in regards to "That is what I mean when I say that the experiment of a hybrid middle ground society remains unproven."
Many countries have mixed economic system with elements of both capitalism and socialism. In the U.S., predominantly a capitalist system, there are still social programs such as social security and Medicare. In many socialist countries, there are private business firms. Australia is an example of a very balanced economy, hence if you look up worldwide economic statistics at the moment, Australia is incredibly powerful on the global economic stage. Which is why even though we're in debt, there are 31 countries, including yours, who have bonds in our debt because it is an incredibly valuable debt. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3419
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 14:56:00 -
[283] - Quote
I like PLEX, PLEXy PLEXy PLEX, down it goes, down into my belly....
Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex 1 x Holiday present 2011: Passion for Fashion Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Free Hours Give Hours for Plex Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation GM Give Days Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation GM Give Days GM Give Days Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Pilot license activation Signup for Eve-Online Account: XXXXXXXXXXX Signup for Eve-Online Account: XXXXXXXXXXX Promotional Game Time (a¦á_a¦â) ~ (my spaceblog) http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.co.uk/~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Remiel Pollard
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
1537
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 15:10:00 -
[284] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:My premise remains sound. Australia is neither large enough, nor has existed for a period of time long enough in their current hybrid social philosophy to make a determination of the long term viability of such a society. The European nations alone have existed long enough in a "nation state" level of society to use them as a possible metric, but they are all socialists.
You may be an example of it working right now, but that is no guarantor of the future. That is what I mean when I say that the experiment of a hybrid middle ground society remains unproven. Particularly given that you have yet to produce a valid one.
Also, now that I've had a moment to do a little research, I can tell you that what I'm talking about has a name: it's called a mixed economy. Turns out, it has plenty of historical precedent.
The American School (also known as the National System) is the economic philosophy that dominated United States national policies from the time of the American Civil War until the mid-twentieth century. It consisted of three core policy initiatives: protecting industry through high tariffs (1861GÇô1932) (changing to subsidies and reciprocity from 1932-1970s), government investment in infrastructure through internal improvements, and a national bank to promote the growth of productive enterprises. During this period the United States grew into the largest economy in the world, surpassing the UK (though not the British Empire) by 1880.
Dirigisme is an economic policy initiated under Charles de Gaulle of France designating an economy where the government exerts strong directive influence. It involved state control of a minority of the industry, such as transportation, energy and telecommunication infrastructures, as well as various incentives for private corporations to merge or engage in certain projects. Under its influence France experienced what is called "Thirty Glorious Years" of profound economic growth.
Social market economy is the economic policy of modern Germany that steers a middle path between the goals of social democracy and capitalism within the framework of a private market economy, and aims at maintaining a balance between a high rate of economic growth, low inflation, low levels of unemployment, good working conditions, public welfare and public services by using state intervention. Under its influence Germany has emerged from desolation and defeat to become an industrial giant within the European Union.
And I'm still laughing that you called Australia a socialist country. The economy of Australia is one of the largest capitalist economies in the world with a GDP of US$1.57 trillion. Australia's total wealth is 6.4 trillion dollars. In 2011, it was the 13th largest national economy by nominal GDP and the 17th-largest measured by purchasing power parity adjusted GDP, about 1.7% of the world economy. Australia is the 19th-largest importer and 19th-largest exporter.
Per capita GDP, or PPP, ranks us fifth in the entire world. Australia's sovereign credit rating is "AAA", higher than the United States of America and Australia's four 'Big Banks' are among the 'World's 50 Safest Banks' as of April 2012. The four largest banks in Australia are also known as the "Big Four". According to the 2011 Credit Suisse Global Wealth report, Australia has a median wealth of US$222,000 ($217,559), the highest in the world and nearly four times the amount of each US adult. The proportion of those with wealth above US$100,000 is the highest of any country GÇô eight times the world average. Average wealth was $US397,000, the world's second-highest after Switzerland.
So for a socialist country, we must be doing alright, hey.  You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:02:00 -
[285] - Quote
The point wasn't in any way the "survival of EVE"...
although I think EVE will survive no matter what revenue system they use, since it's the only space simulator of any real quality.... very much to the credit of all devs.... the visuals are cool and ships are fun to rig.
The point is only this.... PLEX creates a "LESS THAN" gaming event that is not real achievement.
If your opinion of a game is to just use all means (so many of you) possible to get what you want (even out of game cash to advance), then that is your fun.
Yet, if you want to start with "Nothing but a subscription" and build an empire on your own skill, scam or in game merits, then this game will not allow that, due to the ability to introduce real life cash in to it's fake eco system..... other than just the ability to log in.
You may say, well to each is their own... Sure you can do that... just don't buy ISK with real money... but again no that is not accurate, since the game allows others to do it... is my empire real, compared to others who just PLEX it?
That is why Player VS Player isn't real in here.... because your achievement in game is not weighted equally.
Play ANY game ... that is "not equal" and it is a LESS THAN experience with minimal rewards.
Why do you Game? What is your Goal? Why play against other Players?
This game only allows you to play "With" other players and not against them.
Why in the world do you think the Olympics and EVERY Other sport does " Not allow Steroids"?
Because it's not real!!!! Just as EVE's competition is not real, because they allow Steroids in the form of Plex...
|

Din Chao
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
289
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:03:00 -
[286] - Quote
How has this wormhole of a thread not collapsed in on itself yet? |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:04:00 -
[287] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:How has this wormhole of a thread not collapsed in on itself yet?
because it's interesting.... read the post above you in it's entirety and repost. |

Din Chao
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
289
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:10:00 -
[288] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Din Chao wrote:How has this wormhole of a thread not collapsed in on itself yet? because it's interesting.... read the post above you in it's entirety and repost. I've read enough of your posts. Your logic is more dizzying and nausea inducing than the jump animation. |

Soylent Jade
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:17:00 -
[289] - Quote
Yes I'm sure CCP will get right on that whole cutting their income drastically thing. 
I thought PLEX was borderline P2W when I started playing, until I saw some terribly fit faction BB killmails, and realized it really isn't. I really wouldn't care if they did do away with PLEX, but it's never going to happen. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15038
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:31:00 -
[290] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Mag's wrote:How is CCP getting more money per month from the Plex, fail exactly?
Just because you are not spending RL monies, doesn't mean others are not. Just how do you think a Plex comes into existence?
Oh and people trade existing ISK for the Plex. It does not create ISK when traded. It amazes me how people don't get how PLEX is born. When I first stared playing I bought GTC's (Game Time Codes) from one of CCP vendors.. I did so to get my head start as most do, because I am greedy and lazy! 1) Real Money gets thrown down to a Vendor for a Game Time Code of 2 months of play time for $35. 2) I then take that cool time code and offer it in the TimeCode Bazaar (now they've made it easier and can just turn it into 2 PLEX in game). At the time I did it, I think I got like $450 million ISK per .... 3) PLEX is then sold on the market for ISK, which in turn I can if I want to - Buy GEAR without earning it in game. This is a fail, because it's supposed to be a game...not a "Buy my Rig" and see how I do against the hugely entrenched PVP base "Simulator". EVE is certainly a niche, but not in a good way.... Edit = I see you were be sarcastic there... my bad.... you already know the scam....sorry! You didn't answer the question, how is CCP getting more money per month from the Plex fail exactly?
Oh and I know exactly how it was born, it simplified the GTC/ETC system. Which was running well in 2004.
1. So real money gets thrown at CCP for a game time Plex. Or a GTC/ETC is transformed into a game time Plex. Same thing basically. 2. Game time Plex is traded for existing ISK or items in the game. 3. Game time Plex is used.
How is this bad exactly? Are you saying those existing items, are somehow special and more powerful than normal items? If this is the case, why did the person trade them? Wouldn't he be better with them, than without?
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
319
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 16:49:00 -
[291] - Quote
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:Ace Uoweme wrote: What hurts EvE is many things but the main one isn't the pay model, it's the wholesale PvP and/or crime. Not getting Jeweler Jenny to come into a game that will steal her stash. That's a no go from the start. WoW players can withstand even the skill training, but steal their gear? They'll play Minecraft before EvE.
That's like saying that The Ritz is hurting because it doesn't serve big macs.
Let's get real. If PLEX didn't exist, EvE will be joining EQII in actual subs. It's a very niched game, so niched it inbreeds as there's not enough new players staying to keep the gene pool healthy. "In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ~George Orwell
|

Vortexo VonBrenner
Coldest Sea Sailing
503
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:02:00 -
[292] - Quote
You know who is to blame for this mess? CANADA! BLAME CANADA!
I'm listening to-áBj+¦rk, playing EVE, eating fishsticks, and I'm cold....this is immersion gaming. |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:10:00 -
[293] - Quote
Plex/Steroids exist because you demand it...
You demand Free time You demand Pay to Win You don't care about equal game challenge, since you have a "this is EVE" junk happening in your heads.
Pay to Win isn't only in EVE, it's just terrible for the gaming experience in general. and because losers like all of you (and me at the moment) want good stuff for free....... and the ONLY way a dev company can compete is to use the only CARD they got and that is Sell you Steroids to get the insta pump!!! |

Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
3420
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:17:00 -
[294] - Quote
How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'? (a¦á_a¦â) ~ (my spaceblog) http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.co.uk/~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Franco Stein
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:22:00 -
[295] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'?
Too many words... just read the many many posts.. |

Kijo Rikki
Powder and Ball Alchemists Union The Predictables
405
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:25:00 -
[296] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Kijo Rikki wrote:Remove plex and this game would die a horrible death, guaranteed. In a world where losses are real, you cannot keep the players who refuse to spend hours grinding to replace their losses, and you cannot keep the players who refuse to pay real money to maintain a monthly subscription. Take away the plex, and you will not be left with a sustainable playerbase that will help CCP Maintain and improve their product.
Also, I think you'd be surprised the amount of alts people have, and you want to take those away too? I don't think you are thinking this through very well. Plex is the moneymaker for CCP. Always has been, even back when there wasn't plex and CCP just sanctioned game time card sales on the old forums. Well, I think you are wrong.... as the game grew well prior to PLEX. Other games have much larger subscription bases, due to the player retention. They just have a reason for the player to come back and want to play. EVE just doesn't have that kind of content or interest for most gamers. It's just too harsh! You may like it, but the VAST majority of gamers do not! Out of the 500k subs that exist I would guess that there is only less than half of that of real people, perhaps even much less... I have had up to 8 accounts running at the same time in the past.. Now I have 3, and might just plex my main for a few years in case I play again. In any regard .... as I said. PVP doesn't exist like in most ALL other games, so the gamers who "don't want to grind" just to play with other players find other games to play that a more entertaining and don't require that type of grind.... you can say EVE isn't other games... agreed.!!! Yet, the harshness of that cost keeps the game from ever growing to any real numbers.
No, PLEX has always existed as far as I know, and here is the proof. |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 17:42:00 -
[297] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Lady Spank wrote:How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'? Too many words... just read the many many posts..
What I can't work out is why you are championing (white knighting) newer players when it doesn't even effect you.
Surely you should leave that to them if it's a problem. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15039
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 19:30:00 -
[298] - Quote
Six Six Six wrote:Franco Stein wrote:Lady Spank wrote:How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'? Too many words... just read the many many posts.. What I can't work out is why you are championing (white knighting) newer players when it doesn't even effect you. Surely you should leave that to them if it's a problem. I'm sure new players will be thrilled with a champion that doesn't even understand the concept of a Plex. Or what P2W or F2P is. Thrilled.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Six Six Six
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
142
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 19:33:00 -
[299] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Six Six Six wrote:Franco Stein wrote:Lady Spank wrote:How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'? Too many words... just read the many many posts.. What I can't work out is why you are championing (white knighting) newer players when it doesn't even effect you. Surely you should leave that to them if it's a problem. I'm sure new players will be thrilled with a champion that doesn't even understand the concept of a Plex. Or what P2W or F2P is. Thrilled.
Thrilled or not he seems to think he should champion their cause. Not that there's much to champion, hence we go around in circles. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
4319
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 19:34:00 -
[300] - Quote
Franco Stein wrote:Lady Spank wrote:How exactly is PLEX 'pay to win'?
How does it disrupt 'game challenge'? Too many words... just read the many many posts.. Reading a lot of incorrect posts doesn't answer the question. 
Pay to Win is when you can buy an in game advantage with cash that is not available through other means to a player that does not spend cash to acquire it.
This does not occur in EvE.
At most you might get items slightly quicker (but not the skills to use them), although that is highly debatable. The downside is that when that item blows up (as it inevitably will) you are out real cash while the other guy is out only pretend money.
EvEs way of doing things does not even remotely border on being a true pay to win methodology. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |