EVE Search - News Flash on G/Iron/ASCN War

All Channels

Corporations and Alliances Summit

News Flash on G/Iron/ASCN War

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Reba yARR	Posted - 2005.12.01 20:39:00 - [1] So I think I must tell the story of the EPIC battles going on between iron/G and ASCN. Yes this is an alt please donÆt Spam pointing that out. I want to give a fair and balanced news flash of the last few daysà.. Dateline AZN. à.. The iron/G/ASCN war has been in a stalemate now for several weeks. Although their have been battles really nothing has changed. G/iron however has launched a new offensive in AZN by bring down 20-30 small POS and 2-3 Dreads. Yesterday during Europe time they setup the POSÆs in AZN. (I am sure ASCN is not happy to find out that a system with 60 moons is a bad thing as far as defense is concerned.) AZN is a key system to the ASCN defense lying at a middle crossroads to their defense. Its loss may not be fatal but would be a severe blow. Compounding the problem for ASCN is that from what I understand the buggy pos software did not inform them of the 30 POS being setup in their system. (LOL) So very soon after ASCN discovered what was happening ,ASCN started putting a POS in reinforce mode (even though with the current bugs it may not be target able after reinforce mode.) G/iron sent a large fleet over to AZN and very quickly a LARGE battle started at the TR07 gate in AZN. The Battle was huge and of course laggy with hundreds of ships involved. In 1 hour over 200 ships were lost in the system. I get different stories on who won. Compounding the problem is that the ASCN killboard has become rather broken from what I hear. To me a simple way to look at it is ôWho gets the loot cans?ö In this case ASCN got the loot cans. My guess is that ASCN took higher losses overall, but its just too hard to tell what the final tally sheet was. The truth of the matter is that it really did not change anything system control wise. What is for sure is the billions of isk were lost and both sides took high losses. The series of battles took well over an hour to play out. Finally reinforcements showed up from iron and ASCN went to their POS to wait for things to change. For those of you who donÆt know every day the balance of power shifts based on time zones. During Europe time G/iron has the advantage. During USA time ASCN is clearly stronger. So anyway soon G/iron left/logged and the little hobbits got busy. During the next hours ASCN put 10-12 POS in reinforce mode. This implies allot of fire power. What will happen now? ItÆs hard to tell; certainly the nature of the battle will change with RMR. Who will it favor? Who will take the most advantage of the changes remain to be seen. Morale assessment is very subjective. I think that ASCN sees this as a battle for its very existence which tends to motivate people fairly well. ASCN PVP seems to have improved in the last few weeks. G/iron morale remains good I think although some leaders seemed to feel this was going to be over very quickly. If they can truly take and hold AZN the clear advantage to the war would be theirs. Clear Winner so far: LAG Lag was horrible for both sides. Modules not working, warping not responding, overview going blank. CanÆt target enemiesàthe usual stuff. It would be nice if CCP would tell us fixing lag is a top priority. Clear Loser : POS POS wars suck. POS software is very buggy and makes whole thing frustrating to say the least. Rumours: (yup not much to back these up) ASCN used Dreadnaughts during the Fleet battle in AZN yesterday. G/Iron plan to move their alliance down to the south and live there. ASCN used half a dozen dreadnaughts to take out the POSÆs yesterday G/Iron is going to pull in another alliance to help them *Someone will soon attack G/Iron systems in the North. And thatÆs the way it is ....Dec 1st in Eve-land This is Reba Yarr signing off.
Andrei Andropov	Posted - 2005.12.01 20:54:00 - [2] Well since this appears to be a reasoned nonflame thread started by an alt, let me contribute to the thought-out altness. Doesn't G have an Outpost in their current zone of control? If so, it seems unlikely that they would abandon it, unless they're willing to essentially 'bet' it's loss against the odds they'd be able to take out ASCN and assume control over their Outposts/space.
Muthsera	Posted - 2005.12.01 21:39:00 - [3] In my time in eve that is probobly the most accurate and neutral report I have ever seen. It explains the situation very well. And whitout having intel from that area, I can not verify it. But to me it looked solid. My hope is status reports like this becomes more common. It doesn't take sides. And it gives a bird eye view of the situation. Many could learn from this kind of report. Instead of beating the war drums and play propaganda. Nicely done mate. My thoughs
Hampstah	Posted - 2005.12.01 21:59:00 - [4] I'm just jealous of a huge hour long fleet battle that was actually playable. And yeah excellent post. ----- Beware Rodentz with Gunz
Kane Jacobs	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:07:00 - [5] FFS! Press enter once in a while. _______________________________________________
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:22:00 - [6] Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 22:22:38 Originally by: Muthsera In my time in eve that is probobly the most accurate and neutral report I have ever seen. It explains the situation very well. And whitout having intel from that area, I can not verify it. But to me it looked solid. My hope is status reports like this becomes more common. It doesn't take sides. And it gives a bird eye view of the situation. Many could learn from this kind of report. Instead of beating the war drums and play propaganda. Nicely done mate. Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there)
raistalin	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:44:00 - [7] Originally by: Acwron Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 22:25:16 Originally by: Muthsera In my time in eve that is probobly the most accurate and neutral report I have ever seen. It explains the situation very well. And whitout having intel from that area, I can not verify it. But to me it looked solid. My hope is status reports like this becomes more common. It doesn't take sides. And it gives a bird eye view of the situation. Many could learn from this kind of report. Instead of beating the war drums and play propaganda. Nicely done mate. Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts I've read it over a couple times and I don't see alot thats objectionable. How would you know what is being spread within the ranks? This to imply G feels the need to use the ever-lame forum spies? I've seen alot of propaganda smack on the forums and in local from G such that I feel you've no right to accuse anyone of this.
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:46:00 - [8] Originally by: raistalin Originally by: Acwron Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 22:25:16 Originally by: Muthsera In my time in eve that is probobly the most accurate and neutral report I have ever seen. It explains the situation very well. And whitout having intel from that area, I can not verify it. But to me it looked solid. My hope is status reports like this becomes more common. It doesn't take sides. And it gives a bird eye view of the situation. Many could learn from this kind of report. Instead of beating the war drums and play propaganda. Nicely done mate. Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts I've read it over a couple times and I don't see alot thats objectionable. How would you know what is being spread within the ranks? This to imply G feels the need to use the ever-lame forum spies? I've seen alot of propaganda smack on the forums and in local from G such that I feel you've no right to accuse anyone of this. raistalin seriously I don't need a forum spy (or any kind of spy) to know what ASCN think (they say most of it on the forums outloud anyway)
Jin'Roh	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:53:00 - [9] Edited by: Jin''Roh on 01/12/2005 22:53:42 Originally by: raistalin I've seen alot of propaganda smack on the forums and in local from G such that I feel you've no right to accuse anyone of this. aha [ 2005.11.30 22:52:26 ] Sutaa > Rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:26 ] CEO Pyrex > RABBLE [ 2005.11.30 22:52:27 ] Shanzem > sdlkjsdljflkdjf [ 2005.11.30 22:52:28 ] Hyop > stups [ 2005.11.30 22:52:29 ] Shanzem > sodifjspdohfshfshdf [ 2005.11.30 22:52:30 ] Shanzem > sdfhskdhfskdhfklsdhf [ 2005.11.30 22:52:31 ] Shanzem > fisdgfsdhfdshfks [ 2005.11.30 22:52:32 ] Xiphoideus > ja da liegt es [ 2005.11.30 22:52:33 ] Shanzem > sdfhsqjwoeqwopeuqwpoeu [ 2005.11.30 22:52:33 ] xjudgedreadx > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:35 ] Shanzem > hewrhwekljrhklwjenhrw [ 2005.11.30 22:52:36 ] Shanzem > rjweprjopweiuroipu2 [ 2005.11.30 22:52:36 ] xjudgedreadx > jhfjsfhiufh [ 2005.11.30 22:52:38 ] Shanzem > 234u32nkrn324n23 [ 2005.11.30 22:52:38 ] xjudgedreadx > jdcvidfdifu [ 2005.11.30 22:52:39 ] Hyop > ah es lebt :) [ 2005.11.30 22:52:39 ] jattell > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:40 ] Shanzem > weur9wry9w8eru [ 2005.11.30 22:52:41 ] CEO Pyrex > RABBLE [ 2005.11.30 22:52:41 ] Shanzem > 3oi2j423u49823u43298nme [ 2005.11.30 22:52:42 ] xjudgedreadx > hcdiddifffasa [ 2005.11.30 22:52:43 ] Shanzem > eshfisenfesfneifne [ 2005.11.30 22:52:44 ] Shanzem > 340923u4028u4-023 [ 2005.11.30 22:52:46 ] Shanzem > wejfhepowih2q94y32oui [ 2005.11.30 22:52:48 ] Shanzem > fiwejf0wejfjsl;kmadal;kjdwed [ 2005.11.30 22:52:49 ] Shanzem > woijrwrhj3pojr\ [ 2005.11.30 22:52:49 ] Deidranna > ^^ [ 2005.11.30 22:52:51 ] Algoran Chi > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:51 ] Shanzem > soijdu9ehifushiudhfa [ 2005.11.30 22:52:53 ] Shimpu > lol. bild fnr g÷tter :) [ 2005.11.30 22:52:55 ] Algoran Chi > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:55 ] Hyop > omg :) [ 2005.11.30 22:52:55 ] Shanzem > Rabble!!! [ 2005.11.30 22:52:56 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:58 ] xjudgedreadx > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:58 ] kezz2411 > RABBLE.... [ 2005.11.30 22:52:59 ] Sceolan > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:52:59 ] Fitz Chivalry > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:00 ] Ar'tee > rabble rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:01 ] CEO Pyrex > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:01 ] ArcticFox > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:01 ] jattell > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:02 ] Crohnx > rabble! [ 2005.11.30 22:53:03 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:03 ] CEO Pyrex > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:03 ] Sutaa > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:03 ] Hyop > ascn l33t sp34k [ 2005.11.30 22:53:05 ] kezz2411 > RABBLE RRABBLE [ 2005.11.30 22:53:05 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:06 ] CEO Pyrex > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:06 ] Fitz Chivalry > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:07 ] jattell > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:07 ] Cdr Foxbat > Rabble!!! [ 2005.11.30 22:53:07 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:08 ] CEO Pyrex > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:10 ] ArcticFox > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:10 ] CEO Pyrex > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:10 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:11 ] Omaka Takim > rabble! [ 2005.11.30 22:53:11 ] Zy'or Tealon > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:12 ] turnschuh > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:12 ] Shanzem > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:12 ] Sutaa > Rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:12 ] Crohnx > Rabble! [ 2005.11.30 22:53:13 ] jattell > rabble1 [ 2005.11.30 22:53:13 ] Fitz Chivalry > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:13 ] EB Xile > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:14 ] Zy'or Tealon > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:14 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:15 ] Ramireza > looooooooool [ 2005.11.30 22:53:16 ] Toppar Wear > RABBLE [ 2005.11.30 22:53:16 ] Ar'tee > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:16 ] Barek Ironfist > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:17 ] Marcsen > hi mom [ 2005.11.30 22:53:17 ] Zy'or Tealon > rabble [ 2005.11.30 22:53:18 ] Fitz Chivalry > rubble? [ 2005.11.30 22:53:18 ] Maltroc > lol [ 2005.11.30 22:53:19 ] jattell > rabble could post more... jin

Abdalion	Posted - 2005.12.01 22:58:00 - [10] Originally by: Jin'Roh could post more... jin Please don't. --- forum rules \| [email protected] I ♥ You.... ¬ Shepherd of the [23]

Reba yARR	Posted - 2005.12.01 23:42:00 - [11] Originally by: Acwron Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 22:25:16 Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts propagenda? lol Propaganda? Sir with all due respect this is no propagenda or propaganda, I am trying to present the facts as I know them. Is everything perfectly correct? most likely not. I dont even understand the point you are trying to make about your fleet warping in? or part of it? bah. I am trying to tell people the drama (the real news) that is going on. There is no other agenda here. Reba Yarr signing off
Sarmaul	Posted - 2005.12.02 00:00:00 - [12] Originally by: Abdalion Originally by: Jin'Roh could post more... jin Please don't. rofl Originally by: Chowdown We camp a lot
raistalin	Posted - 2005.12.02 01:50:00 - [13] Originally by: Acwron Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 23:08:39 Originally by: raistalin Originally by: Acwron Edited by: Acwron on 01/12/2005 22:25:16 Originally by: Muthsera In my time in eve that is probobly the most accurate and neutral report I have ever seen. It explains the situation very well. And whitout having intel from that area, I can not verify it. But to me it looked solid. My hope is status reports like this becomes more common. It doesn't take sides. And it gives a bird eye view of the situation. Many could learn from this kind of report. Instead of beating the war drums and play propaganda. Nicely done mate. Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts I've read it over a couple times and I don't see alot thats objectionable. How would you know what is being spread within the ranks? This to imply G feels the need to use the ever-lame forum spies? I've seen alot of propaganda smack on the forums and in local from G such that I feel you've no right to accuse anyone of this. raistalin seriously I don't need a forum spy (or any kind of spy) to know what ASCN think (they say most of it on the forums outloud anyway) PS: but if you really want to know convo me ingame in the comming days Fair enough. This is true I must say, one could get that impression easily from us on pub forums.
Griff Skyshock	Posted - 2005.12.02 06:10:00 - [14] Originally by: Reba yARR Rumours: (yup not much to back these up) ASCN used Dreadnaughts during the Fleet battle in AZN yesterday. G/Iron plan to move their alliance down to the south and live there. ASCN used half a dozen dreadnaughts to take out the POSÆs yesterday G/Iron is going to pull in another alliance to help them *Someone will soon attack G/Iron systems in the North. 1. - Yes, Dreads were used during the fight in AZN. 3. - Dreads were used to take out POS, but I did not see half a dozen. The most I saw was 4. 5. - As far as I know, BoB has attacked [G] territory.
memex	Posted - 2005.12.02 07:11:00 - [15] Fritolaysia Cuts Off Chiplomatic Relations With Snackistan ------------------ RDA Appreciation Society
bigsteve	Posted - 2005.12.02 07:19:00 - [16] Quite a few PoS changed Sites, since G Alliance started there PoS erection campaign. When they had finished the erection on the first day, they had the Majority. Now Ascendent Frontier have the Majority. After we started our campaign of placing the PoS's into Re-inforced mode when we had TZ superiority on the first day, G alliance start to offline and Unanchoring a number of them on the second day of the PoS war. Why did they do this? They did not do this to the untouched ones, just the ones that had been attahced. Are they pulling out? Could be, they might of underestimated the fire power that we could field, ie taking a Small PoS into re-infored mode in a little over 30 mins. Are they unachoring them and re-achnoring them at another location? this could be so, so that they last alot longer. But over the course of the last two days, G has lost ~10 PoS site to us, (exact figure not known, as TZ change counts are lost in the excitment of battle). So all the popultaion of AZN-D2 are save once more from the invaders from G alliance.
ArcticFox	Posted - 2005.12.02 10:23:00 - [17] Originally by: Acwron Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts So I'm assuming that your definition of propaganda is something along the lines of "Anything that doesn't state that ASCN is on the verge of collapse due to the un-stoppable might of G and her allies." Because frankly I dont see anything in the OP but exactly what happened. The facts are laid out: POS were placed in system, ASCN started shooting them, Some portion of the G and friends forces came back, A fleet battle ended with G no longer at the gate (regardless of the kills/deaths ratio), ASCN proceeded to put 14 POS into reinforced mode There's nothing slanted towards ASCN that I can find. Do you simply deny that the above events occured? ---------------------------------- "There's no +6 Sword of WTFPWN in Eve." - Er... Some person on the forum...
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.02 11:02:00 - [18] Edited by: Acwron on 02/12/2005 11:02:12 Originally by: ArcticFox Edited by: ArcticFox on 02/12/2005 10:28:23 Originally by: Acwron Well it looks neutral but considering it's full of half truths and doesn't get facts right it's pretty useless. It contains quite a lot of propagenda that ASCN is spreading within their ranks. (e.g. less than a third of our fleet acctually jumped in. the rest was already there) PS: enough with these pseudo alt posts So I'm assuming that your definition of propaganda is something along the lines of "Anything that doesn't state that ASCN is on the verge of collapse due to the un-stoppable might of G and her allies." Because frankly I dont see anything in the OP but exactly what happened. The facts are laid out: POS were placed in system, ASCN started shooting them, Some portion of the G and friends forces came back, A fleet battle ended with G no longer at the gate (regardless of the kills/deaths ratio), ASCN proceeded to put 14 POS into reinforced mode I can state with a fair amount of confidence that if my beleif in these events is based on propaganda it's damn good propaganda, because I could swear I was actually there and saw these things happen. There's nothing slanted towards ASCN that I can find. Do you simply deny that the above events occured? nope I do not deny it but it looks quite different when you take into account that ASCN refused to fight G when ASCN only had around 10-15 ship advantage. (70 vs 80-90). G logged (well it was past midnight during the week). Than ASCN started to act. When there was hardly an enemy left. I'm not saying they should not do that and it's a good strategie when you can't take your enemy head on. The only difference this time was that G was eager for a fleet battle and we got a bloody good one though being heavily outnumbered. Of course our killratio wasn't as good as before but still way on our favour. ASCN still believe that when they shoot POSes when the enemy is not present they win anything. Well keep believing it and you will die even quicker. PS: POS war lol? do you think we could not have placed POSes in every one of your systems if we wanted so? It's about getting you acting since you refused to act last week. And if you refuse again you'll lose more stations.
Goberth Ludwig	Posted - 2005.12.02 11:35:00 - [19] So acvron after weeks of guerilla you got bored and engaged unfavouable odds - good for us. You threaten to anchor more POSes in our space if we dont fight you head on - go ahead, we dealt with the ones in AZN we can deal with the others... Anyway, the angry tone of you post ("dirty hobbitses you wont fight? you will die even quicklier!") gives away a lot about how your currently feeling towards how this war is going ^_^ - Gob (also known as Admiral Goberius)
Demarcus	Posted - 2005.12.02 11:53:00 - [20] Originally by: Griff Skyshock Originally by: Reba yARR Rumours: (yup not much to back these up) ASCN used Dreadnaughts during the Fleet battle in AZN yesterday. G/Iron plan to move their alliance down to the south and live there. ASCN used half a dozen dreadnaughts to take out the POSÆs yesterday G/Iron is going to pull in another alliance to help them *Someone will soon attack G/Iron systems in the North. 1. - Yes, Dreads were used during the fight in AZN. 3. - Dreads were used to take out POS, but I did not see half a dozen. The most I saw was 4. 5. - As far as I know, BoB has attacked [G] territory. If you call small, horribly inefficient gank gangs an "attack" than crank the sirens because were under attack. ------------------------------------- You are all worthless, and weak.
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:00:00 - [21] Originally by: Goberth Ludwig So acvron after weeks of guerilla you got bored and engaged unfavouable odds - good for us. You threaten to anchor more POSes in our space if we dont fight you head on - go ahead, we dealt with the ones in AZN we can deal with the others... Anyway, the angry tone of you post ("dirty hobbitses you wont fight? you will die even quicklier!") gives away a lot about how your currently feeling towards how this war is going ^_^ Gobert im perfectly happy how the war is going.:) Im getting into a fleet battle at least 2 times a week and thats more than fine by me :). I just think it's so funny that ASCN is braging about shooting POSes in the middle of the night and they think that's going to win their war. The POSes are to give you guys incentives to act and finally you did though it was in the middle of the night. So we need to give a even harder time and force you to really face us (and that's all the POSes are about for us).
Goberth Ludwig	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:02:00 - [22] Originally by: Demarcus Originally by: Griff Skyshock 5. - As far as I know, BoB has attacked [G] territory. If you call small, horribly inefficient gank gangs an "attack" than crank the sirens because were under attack. Uh oh someone is about to get forum ganked :U - Gob (also known as Admiral Goberius)
PK CHAOS	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:07:00 - [23] Originally by: Acwron Gobert im perfectly happy how the war is going.:) Im getting into a fleet battle at least 2 times a week and thats more than fine by me :). I just think it's so funny that ASCN is braging about shooting POSes in the middle of the night and they think that's going to win their war. The POSes are to give you guys incentives to act and finally you did though it was in the middle of the night. So we need to give a even harder time and force you to really face us (and that's all the POSes are about for us). Nice bit of spin there (bolded). null
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:16:00 - [24] Originally by: PK CHAOS Originally by: Acwron Gobert im perfectly happy how the war is going.:) Im getting into a fleet battle at least 2 times a week and thats more than fine by me :). I just think it's so funny that ASCN is braging about shooting POSes in the middle of the night and they think that's going to win their war. The POSes are to give you guys incentives to act and finally you did though it was in the middle of the night. So we need to give a even harder time and force you to really face us (and that's all the POSes are about for us). Nice bit of spin there (bolded). null care to explain who that would be a spin? ATM ASCN does not fight us if they only have a slight advantage (except for Crohnx <3)
PK CHAOS	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:27:00 - [25] Acwron, I MENTIONED NOTHING ABOUT FIGHTING. tis aboot your spin on PoS's
Acwron	Posted - 2005.12.02 12:35:00 - [26] Originally by: PK CHAOS Acwron, I MENTIONED NOTHING ABOUT FIGHTING. tis aboot your spin on PoS's fair enough than tell me were is there.
PK CHAOS	Posted - 2005.12.02 13:48:00 - [27] Originally by: "Acwron" The POSes are to give you guys incentives to act and finally you did though it was in the middle of the night. So we need to give a even harder time and force you to really face us (and that's all the POSes are about for us). IS THIS the really reason why you started the PoS erections. Well you are going to say YES, aint you, no-one likes to admit failure do they.
Sickbitch	Posted - 2005.12.02 15:24:00 - [28] Originally by: Acwron Originally by: Goberth Ludwig So acvron after weeks of guerilla you got bored and engaged unfavouable odds - good for us. You threaten to anchor more POSes in our space if we dont fight you head on - go ahead, we dealt with the ones in AZN we can deal with the others... Anyway, the angry tone of you post ("dirty hobbitses you wont fight? you will die even quicklier!") gives away a lot about how your currently feeling towards how this war is going ^_^ Gobert im perfectly happy how the war is going.:) Im getting into a fleet battle at least 2 times a week and thats more than fine by me :). I just think it's so funny that ASCN is braging about shooting POSes in the middle of the night and they think that's going to win their war. The POSes are to give you guys incentives to act and finally you did though it was in the middle of the night. So we need to give a even harder time and force you to really face us (and that's all the POSes are about for us). i think its funny you can only field enough people for a 4 hour period. 3.5 of which you spend at pos
Reba yARR	Posted - 2005.12.02 16:01:00 - [29] Edited by: Reba yARR on 02/12/2005 16:03:49 Edited by: Reba yARR on 02/12/2005 16:02:41 Edited by: Reba yARR on 02/12/2005 16:02:12 DATELINE AZN......Update for Dec 2nd...................... ASCN still controls AZN. They have destroyed 2-4 G/Iron POS and put most of the others in reinforced mode. The little hobbits have also put up new POS's and now control more than 50% (35!) of the moons. G's goal of forcing ASCN to decisive battles has not been successful due to the fact that the POS attacks have been in the USA time frame. No decisive battles as of dec 2nd. 31 ships lost in last 24 hours. As far as other rumours: -Bob has started to harass the G/iron space in the north -ASCN now looks like they only used 3-4 dreads during yesterdays battles. -SE has started flying with G/iron -some SA pilots have flown with ASC -Losses during the dec 1st battle look like they are strongly in G/irons favor And thats the way it is Dec 2nd in eveland Reba Yarr signing off
Discodude	Posted - 2005.12.02 18:28:00 - [30] Edited by: Discodude on 02/12/2005 18:31:02 Edited by: Discodude on 02/12/2005 18:29:25 well let me put 1 of your rumers to rest. here 2 screen shots of ASCN dreads involved in destroying G-Pos's photo 1 photo 2 there were about 4 dreads in this fleet op. We have finished off all pos's that were put into reinforced mode on sept 30 and put more into reinforced mode on dec 1 and I think were in the process of destroying more this morning of Dec 2 (in my time zone it's morning prob afternoon game time) -----------------------------------------------

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.