Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Verity Sovereign
Sovereign Fleet Tax Shelter
501
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 09:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Thats what locator agents are for :)
CN invulns... who uses those nowadays? get a Pith C type... |

Moonlit Raid
State War Academy Caldari State
94
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 22:50:00 -
[32] - Quote
Keith Planck wrote:Terrible Powergrid Which Translates into terrible DPS and range Which turns into terrible completion time Which = terrible isk/hr
I'm pretty sure you can run a site faster with a machariel and coming back in a noctis; or just blitzing sites and skipping salvage.
Literally the only advantage the Vargur has is the tractor beam range and an unnecessary boost to tank. It can tank C4 sleeper sites but so can a machariel, and it can't even fit the 1400s needed to DPS them, or even a smartbomb.
Just... why CCP, why is the powergrid sooooooo terrible... It should be able to fit 1400s and a LARGE shield booster with at most 1 faction reactor control unit.
Well even if these guys don't agree with you, I do. I'd like to be able to fit 1400's to it. |

Arec Bardwin
1007
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 23:11:00 -
[33] - Quote
Anfauglith wrote:This is my Vargur and yes, I like to be semi-afk or wander off to something else  That is why it's capstable and you don't have to worry about aggroing this and that. Oh, and with a set of Crystals you REALLY don't have to worry about being too drunk  [Vargur, Missions] Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Pithum A-Type Medium Shield Booster Caldari Navy Adaptive Invulnerability Field Caldari Navy Adaptive Invulnerability Field Tracking Computer II, Tracking Speed Script Shield Boost Amplifier II Cap Recharger II 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Fusion L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Fusion L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Fusion L 800mm Repeating Artillery II, Republic Fleet Fusion L Small Tractor Beam II Small Tractor Beam II Small Tractor Beam II Large Projectile Ambit Extension I Large Projectile Burst Aerator II No faction gyros makes that a sad Vargur
|

M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
161
|
Posted - 2013.07.20 23:20:00 -
[34] - Quote
Cause it looks awesome! How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |

Shereza
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
166
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 01:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:It is pretty fail as a t2 top of the line boat considering that rest of marauders are not plagued with joke of a powergrid, hopefully CCP will do something about marauders in this century.
The paladin's power grid actually is a bit of a "joke." Also the paladin is about the only marauder that I've seen have trouble being unequivocally superior to its respective race's black ops ship in PvE. The vargur and panther come close, but the panther has some fitting issues and a decidedly weaker tank letting the vargur pull ahead a bit despite the panther having more paper damage.
Trinkets friend wrote: Falloff, bitches. Rat specific tank. Aggroing things properly. ABing away from your DPS. Drones to take out frigs.
Machariel can do all that with a falloff bonus while also fielding 4 sentry drones to help out with any initial long-range combat or for four heavy drones for taking out large structures.
Trinkets friend wrote: You are all bitching because you overtank your Vargurs with Xl bosters because you are sissies.
Or it could just be because fitting an XL booster lets them free up another mid slot for something more useful than a tank mod. |

Keith Planck
League of Extraordinary Equines
507
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
Shereza wrote:Trinkets friend wrote: You are all bitching because you overtank your Vargurs with Xl bosters because you are sissies.
Or it could just be because fitting an XL booster lets them free up another mid slot for something more useful than a tank mod.
This, the big reason the machariel pulls so far ahead is because it has so many more slots, it can fit so much more damage.
XL shield booster, or Large shield booster with an amp. Doesn't really matter, you still can't get the range, or the webs, or the damage. |

Keith Planck
League of Extraordinary Equines
507
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 07:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:Varg is only good as ov3rtank3d mission runner ir will never out dps out run or out perform machariel and it cant use 1400mm artys without making it a joke fit.
It is pretty fail as a t2 top of the line boat considering that rest of marauders are not plagued with joke of a powergrid, hopefully CCP will do something about marauders in this century.
Your one to talk :P |

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 09:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:Varg is only good as ov3rtank3d mission runner ir will never out dps out run or out perform machariel and it cant use 1400mm artys without making it a joke fit.
It is pretty fail as a t2 top of the line boat considering that rest of marauders are not plagued with joke of a powergrid, hopefully CCP will do something about marauders in this century. Well, pirate battleships are supposed to be top-DPS boats so your argument is invalid.
And in missions, 1400 mms are the joke to begin with. I did fly Machariel and don't remember a single mission when artillery performed better than autocannons. Ammo saving was obviously better, but ISK/hr - never.
In this regard the argument about fielding 4 sentries is also a moot, unless someone wants to say they use both AC-s and sentries...
And lastly, from completness point of view it's indeed strange that this ship can't use long range guns of its class. But if you think it hurts your mission performance then you're doing them wrong. Even if it was indeed a case, this crippled Vargur still performs better than fully pimped Vindicator. (OK, on most missions, because nothing beats blasters in Damsel in Distress) |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 14:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
hmskrecik wrote:Mina Sebiestar wrote:Varg is only good as ov3rtank3d mission runner ir will never out dps out run or out perform machariel and it cant use 1400mm artys without making it a joke fit.
It is pretty fail as a t2 top of the line boat considering that rest of marauders are not plagued with joke of a powergrid, hopefully CCP will do something about marauders in this century. Well, pirate battleships are supposed to be top-DPS boats so your argument is invalid. And in missions, 1400 mms are the joke to begin with. I did fly Machariel and don't remember a single mission when artillery performed better than autocannons. Ammo saving was obviously better, but ISK/hr - never. In this regard the argument about fielding 4 sentries is also a moot, unless someone wants to say they use both AC-s and sentries... And lastly, from completness point of view it's indeed strange that this ship can't use long range guns of its class. But if you think it hurts your mission performance then you're doing them wrong. Even if it was indeed a case, this crippled Vargur still performs better than fully pimped Vindicator. (OK, on most missions, because nothing beats blasters in Damsel in Distress)
Your answer would be perfectly valid if this game was named "l4 missions only using autocanons online" and not "eve online"
After all this changes there are army of ships that will out dps vargur in missions(one thing ship should excelling in) making all of those ships better bang for your buck.
Only thing that goes for varg is easy tank mode and that alone does nothing to make this ship perform good it just make it easy to tank.
This is what you should look at any ship before using one in precise order.
1 DPS potential 2 DPS potential 3 DPS projection 4 DPS projection 5 mobility 6 drone bay 7 is your hard drive fragmented or not 8 are your GPU drivers up to date 9 are you drunk or not 10 local tank.
So as i see it varg in nothing more than over tanked pigeon holed ship.because if you moved from basic decade old pve to new forms of it ship sucks... it pg is serious issue not having option to fit 1400mm is nothing more than pathetic.
and lets not forget that even with autocannons it isn't something to write home about.
@ Shereza
Paladin did have tight pg that is true but varg is in pathetic area with that,also lazors got buffed with lowering pg req for them that should make thing easier and Redeemer is rly good black-ops. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 15:12:00 -
[40] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:[....] there are army of ships that will out dps vargur in missions Name them please. A single Machariel does not make an "army". For sure Vindicator, Kronos nor Dominix do not belong to this list.
Quote:So as i see it varg in nothing more than over tanked pigeon holed ship If you overtank your Varg then it is your problem and it is you doing it wrong.
Quote:it pg is serious issue not having option to fit 1400mm is nothing more than pathetic. I agreed: not being able to fit 1400mms is an issue with regard to being able to fit 1400mms. In respect to being able to competently finish the mission, the issue is non existent. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 16:20:00 -
[41] - Quote
hmskrecik wrote:Mina Sebiestar wrote:[....] there are army of ships that will out dps vargur in missions Name them please. A single Machariel does not make an "army". For sure Vindicator, Kronos nor Dominix do not belong to this list. Quote:So as i see it varg in nothing more than over tanked pigeon holed ship If you overtank your Varg then it is your problem and it is you doing it wrong. Quote:it pg is serious issue not having option to fit 1400mm is nothing more than pathetic. I agreed: not being able to fit 1400mms is an issue with regard to being able to fit 1400mms. In respect to being able to competently finish the mission, the issue is non existent.
Kronos with rails is lacking ~ 100dps... with blasters sure but they are kinda sucky for missions
But Vindi with rails will pull same dps as varg can with autos it will have 30k opty not 3k and plenty of falloff as well add 5 sentry's and it rly pull forward.
Navy domi will out dps varg bu 200-400 dps using rails+ drones,
Golem and CNR will own Vargur
Paladin and NM will out dps it too.
TFI will out dps it as well...N mega should be able to out dps(*using rails and sentry) it too N apoc is close but what it lacks in raw dps it compensate with 80+k optimal and nice tracking.
i am forgetting few..oh n Armageddon will out dps it as well.
Overtanking it or undertanking it yield same result it is dead end skill wise t2 ship that is average at running missions and worse at rest of pve and for most part unusable for pvp and it cant use it own racial weapons.
It is good for missions sure but marauder description imply s it should be more than that and if faction ships is better than it than what marauder is supposed to be good at? http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 17:03:00 -
[42] - Quote
You're missing the point. I'm not talking about EFT- warrioring. I'm talking about actual in-game performance. As in "ISK per hour", or "tick value", or "time to mission completion", you name it. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 17:17:00 -
[43] - Quote
The 'Point' is that Vargur is good to average mission runner that you need to invest years of training time to fly in autocannon only variant while u can do same(faction ships) or BETTER(pirate ships) for half of training time that will also expand your skill to another race ships for example.
That is the 'Point' not your i am fine with what it does..some ppl see it potential and where it lacking..you are clearly not one of them. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
90
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 17:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Strawman ---> this way
My point has been always the same: Vargur is one of the best performing missioning ships of those I used so far. Not being able to fit artillery is strange but is not a problem. |

hellcane
Never Back Down
71
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 17:48:00 -
[45] - Quote
EFT warrioring looks fun |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 18:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
hmskrecik wrote:Strawman ---> this way
My point has been always the same: Vargur is one of the best performing missioning ships of those I used so far. Not being able to fit artillery is strange but is not a problem.
Since you are repeating your self il just drop this here
"Your answer would be perfectly valid if this game was named "l4 missions only using autocanons online" and not "eve online" " PWG is an issue if you god forbid try to do something different than shooting tier 1 rats.
And for a T2 battleship it does suck when pirate AND faction ship are able to out class it
It literally don't bring anything to table worth mentioning or worth invested skill points in marauders that will make you BETTER mission runner than using some other ships. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 18:17:00 -
[47] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:PWG is an issue if you god forbid try to do something different than shooting tier 1 rats.
And for a T2 battleship it does suck when pirate AND faction ship are able to out class it
It literally don't bring anything to table worth mentioning or worth invested skill points in marauders that will make you BETTER mission runner than using some other ships. Please... The fact that you cannot competently use this ship does not mean the ship is bad. I'll repeat myself once more: I flew both Vargur and Machariel and all I can say is that Vargur has nothing to be ashamed of.
hellcane wrote:EFT warrioring looks fun Tru dat. Though it gets old very fast. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 18:22:00 -
[48] - Quote
Except it is worse than mach it is gimped for pvp and it is worse for rest of pve yeah it sure is shameless. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 18:31:00 -
[49] - Quote
Sorry, I can't hear you through the sound of ISK hitting my wallet.
No, really. If you want to make me convinced, convince me by actual performance figures. This is not the first such dispute I've been to and probably not the last and the thing is, I don't give a damn about stats analysis. I only care about what really matters: how a ship performs in game. You still didn't make your case on these terms. |

hellcane
Never Back Down
72
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 18:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
hmskrecik wrote:hellcane wrote:EFT warrioring looks fun Tru dat. Though it gets old very fast.
Still amusing to see people doing it in these type of threads.
hmskrecik wrote:No, really. If you want to make me convinced, convince me by actual performance figures. This is not the first such dispute I've been to and probably not the last and the thing is, I don't give a damn about stats analysis. I only care about what really matters: how a ship performs in game. You still didn't make your case on these terms.
You wont change the mind of the people that honestly believe EFT > actual performance. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
"Sorry, I can't hear you through the sound of ISK hitting my wallet."
lol like lol
I fly ships too and i do give a damn,that's why i am here advocating for ship that is with gimped PWG and is gimped in more ways than one.
And while it can deliver doing l4 there are simply better ships for that and when one expand it views above l4 missions it become apparent what i am talking about.
And lastly i am not here to convince you anything you responded to me disagreeing not other way around.
@ hellcane
i think that you will make more impact if you find EFT meme to link otherwise you are just mildly boring and even less contributing to discussion/argument/whatever.. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
540
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:04:00 -
[52] - Quote
A mach outperforms a vargur, it's got everything the varg has and a 25% damage bonus on top of it. The tracking bonus doesn't matter too much unless you're a terrible pilot and the tank bonus doesn't matter too much because it's not really a limiting factor in level 4s.
The time to pull out the vargur is when tank is important like high rated DED sites and possibly wormholes. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:08:00 -
[53] - Quote
"The time to pull out the vargur is when tank is important like high rated DED sites and possibly wormholes"
Mach can do those too maybe c5 emphasis in maybe in varg and even than if you are soloing it you are doing it wrong might as well mine gas in a omen. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
540
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:11:00 -
[54] - Quote
I doubt a mach could do anything above a 5/10, typically you get full room aggro instantly and the npcs are spawn pretty close. Mach relies on being able to manage incoming DPS by a combination of speed and target selection |

hellcane
Never Back Down
72
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:13:00 -
[55] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:A mach outperforms a vargur Feeding the mach faction ammo, you get 30 dps more once you are 10km closer to the target. There are other differences that dictate which would be better based off of playstyle.
Super-tanking the vargur is the wrong way to go. |

Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
387
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
10/10 angels get eaten with mach http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
540
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
Mina Sebiestar wrote:10/10 angels get eaten with mach
good luck in final pocket with 4 web towers and the antimatter channeler |

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:20:00 -
[58] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:A mach outperforms a vargur, A pirate battleship outperforms a marauder. In other news, Elvis is still dead.
Nobody questions the fact that Machariel outperforms Vargur. But then again, Machariel outperforms almost every other ship so it doesn't mean anything. The question is how Vargur stands on its own. And the answer can be split to two independent issues:
1. Not being able to fit 1400mms (or 1200mms for that matter). Machariel with ACs gets better ticks than Machariel with arties. Since Machariel and Vargur have the same falloff bonus I really doubt the arties on Vargur could outdo ACs.
2. How AC Vargur performs related to other non-Machariel ships? Very, very well. |

Tsukino Stareine
The Red Circle Inc.
540
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
I would hazard to say most of the navy battleships would also outperform the vargur in level 4s. Would also say Dominix (regular T1) would outperform. |

hmskrecik
TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance
91
|
Posted - 2013.07.21 19:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Tsukino Stareine wrote:I would hazard to say most of the navy battleships would also outperform the vargur in level 4s. Would also say Dominix (regular T1) would outperform. You guess while I fly all this crap and compare ticks. I dunno about nullsec anoms but in L4s Vargur is second only to Machariel. |
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |