| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |

Shamad Conde
|
Posted - 2005.12.14 17:47:00 -
[241]
Edited by: Shamad Conde on 14/12/2005 17:47:21 o_0
|

Vegas
|
Posted - 2005.12.14 17:47:00 -
[242]
Originally by: Metal Dude
We donĘt start the smack but we finish it.
That one's for my sig
Originally by: Metal Dude
We donĘt start the smack but we finish it.
|

Kcel Chim
|
Posted - 2005.12.14 17:49:00 -
[243]
Originally by: SinBin
Ill have to agree also we made the mistake of assuming ATUK member had some say in there corp actions, our mistake for not seeking out an FC since they was all crashed we had to take the word of ATUK member that could get online.
If you read my post on the main topic here I belive i see an ATUK stuck & not at any time did I assume it was done on purpose.
another fine FE argument example. We have persh claiming NO 5 member was crashed. We have you claiming all our FC's crashed (and prior to that that u only saw 2 of our supposed to be 10+ ppl fleet).
Not to mention that we actually had a node reboot last night. This means ALL nodes were rebooted and yet still some of us had login issues (like myself not beeing able to login till 0.00 and went to bed).
Quiet contradicting claims here FE dudes. Maybe it would make some sense if you actually try to syncronize your conspiracy theories, its bad if they contradict each other without 1 word added from our side.
|

HellsRazor
|
Posted - 2005.12.15 10:12:00 -
[244]
ok i only read first post...
but id just like to say... i could not get into game... filed petition. i entered game 10min later, npc ed in my p[ricey ship...out of no where moved to hostile space 11 jumps from where i was...not at a station but at a ss in a hostile region. I yelled tp GM to put me back and i was finally placed back after a few minutes. BUT, why was i moved 11 jumps in space in hostile area? o and by a GM or was it dev..i get mixxed on terms...but who every filed my claim was an ex enemy of my alliance.
i mean it was algood i didnt die and he put me back...but im lost why it happen in first place 11 jumps in space ...in a hostile region with hostile pvpers in local.
|

Mr Raine
|
Posted - 2005.12.15 12:36:00 -
[245]
i dont think the gms should have any other account or charector, they support the game and create the game, they should not be able to play , if you wish to test use your gm account on the test server, simple.
my thoughts on the matter,
and back tracking on certain matters is a no go. u make a decision u stick with it, this seems to be happening more often then not resently, you can either give in or hold your guns, and you falling off the seat becuase of mis communitcation etc etc, and lower people down your chain of command making incorrect decisions,
to sum up. gm's should not be able to have another charector/account,
and stick with your decisions, make sure u have the right person making the decisions,
mr raine,
oh and by the way, this is what i belief and maybe not what others share,
|

Feta Solamnia
|
Posted - 2005.12.15 12:51:00 -
[246]
heh...
Oh If I only valued disclosure more than I value the trust of friends...
Originally by: Oveur
I have access to all market data. Believe me, we have not reached anything close to deflation yet.
|

Maud
|
Posted - 2005.12.15 13:51:00 -
[247]
Ohh My the whine is an old one.
Case point
The Big VV-VCR fight
The JQA & 3rd front forces were fighting the old CA forces (I use this as it was a mixed fleet & they were all in CA before it broke up. Suddenly an apparant Node crash resulting in just about all the JQA forces dropping offline. Needless to say 3rd front were now vastly outgunned & got maimed. The JQA pilots couldn't log back for 30 mins due to lag & then appeared in small numbers.
The consequences were far greater than the apparrent FE only crash but most pilots took it on the chin and got on with the fight next day. (3rd front pilots never trusted JQA fully again as a result tho)
This happens its rare & would be almost impossible for a GM to organise. Its another LAG induced incident & should be no suprise !
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |