EVE Search - Announcement:EVE Online: Odyssey 1.1 Feedback

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Announcement:EVE Online: Odyssey 1.1 Feedback

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)

CCP Falcon 3930	Posted - 2013.09.03 08:56:00 - [1] - Quote EVE Online: Odyssey 1.1 has been successfully deployed on Tranquility on September 3rd, 2013. Full patch notes are available here. This thread is for feedback only. For reporting issues, please use the EVE Online: Odyssey issues thread here. When reporting issues, please remember to specify which client you are using (PC or Mac). CCP Falcon -á \|\| -á EVE Community Team -á \|\| -á EVE Illuminati -á \|\| -á Live Events Organizer @CCP_Falcon -á \|\| -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents

Nikolai Vodkov Pro Synergy 56	Posted - 2013.09.03 11:31:00 - [2] - Quote Energy Management, Energy Emission Systems and Energy Systems Operation: have been renamed "Capacitor Management", "Capacitor Emission Systems" and "Capacitor Systems Operation". Really? Why didn't you just call it the "Yellow thingie in the middle of your hud operations" ? Run level 4 missions? -áIncrease your income and help new players earn ISK. -áJoin channel: Pro Synergy Pro Synergy is looking for dedicated Salvagers. -áWant to learn more? -áJoin channel: Pro Synergy
hmskrecik TransMine Group German Information Network Alliance 111	Posted - 2013.09.03 11:32:00 - [3] - Quote [bad post]
Tara Tyrael R.P.S. Prime 85	Posted - 2013.09.03 11:36:00 - [4] - Quote reserved ************************************************
mr ed thehouseofed Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 352	Posted - 2013.09.03 11:55:00 - [5] - Quote love the new skills tree much easier to understand , not being a nerd and all real gamers only need one toon-á
Phil Utrigas BRAB0 The Volition Cult 0	Posted - 2013.09.03 11:58:00 - [6] - Quote great work CCP, thank you millions o7
Jacumbo Ren Black Scorpions Inc Circle-Of-Two 3	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:02:00 - [7] - Quote Have noticed with scanning sites now, that if i get a site to 100% then move the probes away to scan another site, i no longer have the "warp to" button on the result. I need to pass a scan over it again, or bookmark it. Before patch the "warp to" button would stay there, even after I pulled probes. Not sure if this is intended or not.
Abon Riff Raptor Navy Dominatus Atrum Mortis 2	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:20:00 - [8] - Quote Jacumbo Ren wrote: Have noticed with scanning sites now, that if i get a site to 100% then move the probes away to scan another site, i no longer have the "warp to" button on the result. I need to pass a scan over it again, or bookmark it. Before patch the "warp to" button would stay there, even after I pulled probes. Not sure if this is intended or not. Same as he said.. Plus even though I have previously scanned the anomaly to 100%, it appears as a large red unresolved signature or a red circle. Don't really want to scan them twice, having not jumped out of the system.
M1k3y Koontz Thorn Project Surely You're Joking 286	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:23:00 - [9] - Quote New music for lowsec but not WH? I don't even bother turning on the sound anymore cause I'm tired of the same 10 seconds of music on an endless loop. How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.
Salpun Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects 642	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:31:00 - [10] - Quote Drones radial needs the recall to drone bay on the first level.

Jacumbo Ren Black Scorpions Inc Circle-Of-Two 3	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:34:00 - [11] - Quote M1k3y Koontz wrote: New music for lowsec but not WH? I don't even bother turning on the sound anymore cause I'm tired of the same 10 seconds of music on an endless loop. Make al those iskies from WH loot, and have cool music. Asking for a bit much aint ya? XD
Blue Absinthe Fur Industries 14	Posted - 2013.09.03 12:39:00 - [12] - Quote When will be able to see the health of drones in the bay......
Ivan Isovich Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:09:00 - [13] - Quote Not a fan of the the new display for ship and character attributes. Forces way too much eye movement back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...Allow the option of a collapsed view (like the old way). I can see differences of opinion on this one.
Aplier Shivra 20	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:09:00 - [14] - Quote Now any time a target I'm shooting at dies, I get the black box notification in the middle of my screen saying "you lost your target lock on [ship type], all modules being used on their vessel were deactivated". I know I lost my lock, I know my modules are being deactivated, I just watched this ship die by my lazors, I dont need a notification in the middle of my screen to tell me. Is there any way to make this disappear or at least not apply to when ships die?
Musashibou Benkei Combined Imperial Fleet JIHADASQUAD 17	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:13:00 - [15] - Quote so now there's absolutely no difference between the field and fleet command ships............ armor and siege links seriously nerfed (oh, i'm sorry; "adjusted") with no real purpose. these links affect smaller groups than larger fleets. changes made by CCP continue their downwards fall.
Thane Kuvora Infinitech 1	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:14:00 - [16] - Quote I don't like the new layout when you 'show info' on anything. It was easier to read the way it was before PLEASE CHANGE IT BACK. Why was the Badger Mark II renamed to a word that is hard to pronounce? Tayra doesn't even roll off the tongue, change it back please. IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT!!!
Miyamoto Uroki Commando Aeternitas Blinky Red Brotherhood 0	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:17:00 - [17] - Quote Ivan Isovich wrote: Not a fan of the the new display for ship and character attributes. Forces way too much eye movement back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...back and forth...Allow the option of a collapsed view (like the old way). I can see differences of opinion on this one. +1 for this. I think it's much harder to quickly read stats now.
Matthias Thullmann Dynatron Inc. The Volition Cult 6	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:22:00 - [18] - Quote Apologize if I'm being naive but what does the amount of explosives in a missile warhead have to do with it tracking a target? This is equivalent of TDs affecting the damage of an artillery shell. TD scripts should affect flight speed and flight time respectively. Silliest update ever, hope something changes next time around.
XxD3s7r0y3rxX R.E.V.0.K.E.D Unleashing Chaos 14	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:25:00 - [19] - Quote I'm not too crazy about the mindlink nerf. 37.5% would've been fair enough.
Akrasjel Lanate Naquatech Conglomerate 1199	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:36:00 - [20] - Quote So far all looks good.

Catastrophe Bloom MUSE Apprenticeship Metaphysical Utopian Society Enterprises 12	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:37:00 - [21] - Quote Thane Kuvora wrote: Why was the Badger Mark II renamed to a word that is hard to pronounce? Tayra doesn't even roll off the tongue, change it back please. Tay-ra is hard?
Infiltrator2112 Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda 5	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:38:00 - [22] - Quote The name changes went waaays to far, seriously. The "Remote Shield Booster" is only the beginning, it gets worse and worse with the "Large Remote Capacitor Transmitter" and "Remote Tracking Computer". Naming stuff according to exactly what it does may make the game a little bit more noob-friendly, but you loose a lot of atmosphere for it, and in a game like EVE that lives a lot from being a "serious internet spaceship game", it's definately not worth it. I'm ok with the skill-renaming, but those new module names just sound ******** and destroy the feeling of EVE being EVE. Please change the names back or make the new ones at least a bit more authentic. [Sarcasm]Why not rename Mega Pulse Laser and Tachon Laser to "Big Short-Range Laser" and "Big Long-Range Laser"?[/Sarcasm]
Athelas Loraiel StarFleet Enterprises Fatal Ascension 8	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:42:00 - [23] - Quote I dislike new names for noobs. it shouldnt be changed from energy emissions or transfers....it was ok.
Infiltrator2112 Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda 5	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:45:00 - [24] - Quote Athelas Loraiel wrote: I dislike new names for noobs. it shouldnt be changed from energy emissions or transfers....it was ok. Agreed. With a little bit of thinking anyone can relate an "Energy Transfer Array" to a thing that transfers capacitor.
Aplier Shivra 20	Posted - 2013.09.03 13:47:00 - [25] - Quote Also dislike the new names, not everything has to be "noob friendly", they can always click attribute tab to see what it does if there is any confusion.
Doo EetNaow Sons of War 3	Posted - 2013.09.03 14:08:00 - [26] - Quote Total mess up of the cost to purchase the Navy mindlinks. 100m isk + 2x t2 mindlinks which are bother over 100m each. 300m and 100k LP, and they are selling for 230m........ Do the math...we are out of pocket by 70m when using 100k lp. Why would anyone buy these from the navy store.
Ginger Barbarella Caldari Provisions Caldari State 1471	Posted - 2013.09.03 14:10:00 - [27] - Quote I'll add my voice of discontent for the new Info tabs layout: not good. Not easy to read quickly. Also still don't get the driving need to screw with the industrials: why did some think there was a NEED to have specialized holds on these ships, when the basic cargohold worked perfectly fine? Now I have a couple ships that I actually like to fly that are completely worthless to me. Thanks tons. And changes to links: just no, but it's too late for that. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac
Aplier Shivra 20	Posted - 2013.09.03 14:22:00 - [28] - Quote Doo EetNaow wrote: Total mess up of the cost to purchase the Navy mindlinks. 100m isk + 2x t2 mindlinks which are bother over 100m each. 300m and 100k LP, and they are selling for 230m........ Do the math...we are out of pocket by 70m when using 100k lp. Why would anyone buy these from the navy store. market prices should settle out pretty soon. the armor/info mindlink is going for over 1b in some hubs atm. CCP doesnt set prices or LP rate, players do. look at how bad the ratio is on some implants.
Guttripper State War Academy Caldari State 315	Posted - 2013.09.03 14:45:00 - [29] - Quote Re: name changes... Copied from here. "Quad LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" are now known as "Prototype 100MN MicroWarpdrive I "LiF Fueled Booster Rockets" are now known as "Experimental 100MN Afterburner I" "Phased Monopropellant I Hydrazine Boosters" are now known as "Upgraded 1MN Microwarpdrive I "Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" are now known as "Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I" "Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon Microwarpdrive" are now known as "Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I" "Monopropellant Hydrazine Boosters" are now known as "Limited 1MN Afterburner I" "Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters" are now known as "Experimental 1MN Afterburner I" "Y-S8 Hydrocarbon Afterburners" are now known as "Experimental 10MN Afterburner I" Can't confuse newbies you know!
L4V4 H4LP 3	Posted - 2013.09.03 14:45:00 - [30] - Quote Thanks for the good work! Although sometimes I wonder how you decide on some of these things..



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.