| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

William Bradley
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 06:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I'm not aware if these ideas have been posted or not, so with that said here goes:
As many players are aware, there is a serious problem in the game with margin trading scamming going on. However, it is not just the practice itself that is the problem, but the fact that the continued existence and prevalence of such abuse is not sensible with respect to EVE Online's in-game world itself.
For context, lets quickly note how the act of margin trading scamming is able to occur: A player trained up to use the Margin Trading skill places an order on the market, but using only a fraction of the overall isk value of the order according to the skill's level. In order for the scam to work, the player then makes sure that the isk remaining in that character's wallet is low enough that the order(s) will fail when another player attempts to complete them.
In the real world, such an action has a single term: Fraud.
However, in the in-game world, such fraud is allowed to occur and is not dealt with in any meaningful way. In light of this, I have two ideas to propose; they are not ideas which can perfectly fix the problem, but should at least make it possible to help cut down on the abuse.
Idea 1: Penalties for failed margin orders. Whenever a player puts up a margin buy order, they are asking for the financial trust of the in-game market system that when the order is to be claimed that there will at least be enough isk in the player's wallet to allow the order to complete successfully. Whenever a player breaches that trust, there should be real and meaningful consequences, penalizing the player for any and all failed margin trades they attempted.
The foremost idea in terms of what types of penalties to apply to the player would be fines, and in an amount comparative to the total isk value of the overall order but with a minimum amount in order to make sure that margin scamming is de-incentivised even for orders with very low values. The point of having a scaled fine amount like this is to try and defeat margin trade scamming at its heart - by cutting into the potential profits a person would make through scamming, making it not worth the player's time to even attempt such fraud in the first place. I'm not sure what percentage of the order would be an appropriate fine for a failed order - 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, etc - I assume the CCP devs would have a better idea in that regard.
The other idea I have for an additional penalty that could be applied, although possible less meaningful, would be a loss in the player's character's security and/or empire standings as a result of failed margin orders. Since such fraud would be seen as a (serious) crime in the eyes of the civilizations in question, a player should lose standing as would be befitting a criminal act (such as with other crimes like suicide ganks and whatnot); particularly since having the player's character end up in jail is sadly apparently not an option.
A further idea that could be done either with, or in place of, the above idea for standings loss on failed market orders would be to instead establish a new standing value for player characters: Market Standing. Such a value could be very useful, in theory, for the game's market system. As a player interacts with the market, probably through placed buy/sell orders, they would slowly accrue "market standing"; representing the amount of "trust" that player character has earned through honest interactions with the market system. In a sense, it'd be a similar notion to the idea of a merchant rating in the real world. Such a stat could be particularly useful for one's market settings, because you could then instruct the game to automatically filter out market orders below a certain standings threshold (default being 0). And, by having such a value available, if a person does in fact allow a margin order to fail they could incur a heavy hit to their market standings (potentially even driving the value into negative numbers?), with the magnitude of standings loss likely corresponding to the isk value of the failed margin order. Combined with the filtering, abusers of the market could end up with their market orders not being shown to the majority of the in-game player population, serving as an additional layer of protection for honest players.
Idea 2: Wallet locking based on currently active margin orders. While possibly an idea which would partially defeat the purpose of margin trading, I do believe it could be effective for a player's wallet to be locked according to the isk value of their highest active margin order. To clarify, what I mean by wallet locking is that it would not allow the player to buy, give, or otherwise transfer isk out of their character's wallet if the wallet's value would fall under the locked value as a result of the action. The purpose of such a system is to ensure some minimum amount of isk remains within the player's wallet to at least cover the highest value margin order they have active. That would allow for there to be a buffer of isk to at least cover their largest order, but to also increase the odds of the player's wallet being able to successfully cover most/all of their lower value margin orders that they have active. That is the key point to take away from this suggestion, because it would allow for some safety to be added to the margin trading system but without defeating the overall purpose of margin trading itself.
So, there are the ideas I've thought up lately regarding how the margin trading system could be improved to function better, be more sensible, and most importantly help protect players against the overwhelmingly prevalent problem of predatory margin trading scams that are plaguing the EVE Online universe. If you have constructive input to offer on the matter, please do so; if not, please don't. |

Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
382
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 07:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'll be honest. My personal view is, that the skill is working fine as it is. Though increased broker fees in general would probably be a good thing.
All risks connected to the margin trading skill are just general risks of doing business in EVE. They fit perfectly well with the overall design of the game when it comes to trading.
If you have been scammed and want to have revenge, get the necessary intel and strike back with any means you deem appropriate.
If you can't be bothered, just deal with it. Remove insurance. |

Arya Regnar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 07:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
As long as the deposits don't cover the total amount this will continue to be a scam. And full deposits would cripple market marvelously for people that don't sit on trillions.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|

Ssoraszh Tzarszh
Tzarszh Capital Group Incorporated
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 08:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
While it is something of a bother, this so called 'scam' or 'exploit' only works because of greedy people who did not do their research.
For example, if i have a batch of 'stuff' like tritanium for example and i see a buy order for 5 isk per unit and i haul it over there and it fails i will have lost time, it is annoying to deal with it. However i have not lost any liquid isk on this because i still have this 'stuf' i can sell to other people. And as most of the time these reasonable high prices for normal 'stuff' i might have to concede to sell it for 4 isk where i had planned to sell at 5, but sell it i still can.
The only reason people are complaining about this is when someone takes advantage of the 'greed modifier', where the same person will sell something for a high price and sets up an even higher buy order for set module/item with minimum sell requirements.
'Victims' will fall for this when they see a fast isk generating opportunity and buy the overpriced 'stuff' and try to sell it to the buy order, which will fail due to the fact that the buyer does not have the isk required to buy the item. Leaving them with an item not worth half of what they payed for it, all to make a quick buck.
Now a 1 second glance at the market history tab will tell you if that is happening in most situations, look at how many units are actually selling per day, the moving average and whether or not the price recently was much lower than it is now. These are the market skills you need to have to be able to avoid these 'scams'.
The people setting up these 'scams' are looking for the amateur hour traders to feed them isk, and in the end the 'victim' made his/her own decision to buy the item in the first place for the exact price listed.
The skill 'Margin Trading' as it is now enables large scale industrialists to 'pre-set' buy orders when their current stock is in a manufacturing cycle or still on the market. IRL companies do this as well only use loans from banks to do this something that requires a level of trust unheard of in Eve Online.
|

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
225
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 08:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
Putting it in another way. You want CCP to add a not insignificant amount of game breaking new code into the game to prevent greedy people from having their arses handed to them?
Also this: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3587783#post3587783 Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1800
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 12:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
I have a better proposal: Don't be greedy, and put in a little bit of effort before blindly buying up expensive things hoping to make a huge quick profit
The other suggestions in this topic are rather awful from a design point of view.
Remember folks, CCP can't patch stupid |

Arya Regnar
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
110
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 13:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I have a better proposal: Don't be greedy, and put in a little bit of effort before blindly buying up expensive things hoping to make a huge quick profit
The other suggestions in this topic are rather awful from a design point of view.
Remember folks, CCP can't patch stupid CCP can foolproof the market but chances are people are going to invent better idiots.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|

SOL Ranger
Jaeger Squadron
25
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 13:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
SOL Ranger wrote:As I see It this can be solved by making any escrow to be dependently shared among buy orders.
Escrow rules:
A buy order can never be set unless the resulting total amount in escrow covers its value fully.
When total escrow is going below the value of a buy order your account(wallet) is charged to cover it.
Failing to cover the attempted charge any buy order which is not covered by total escrow will be immediately removed the very moment this is true.
One important result from this is, the highest buy order will always be the limiting factor, thus you will only engage in business on a level you can actually afford to do business in.
Minimum buy rules: Minimum buy amount can never be higher than 10% of the amount sold currently within a station.
Minimum buy amount will always be adjusted(per sale) by automation, between 1 and the preferred amount only(does not change anything in the buy order, just allows a bypass when sales are low).
In multi station wide buy orders the minimum buy amount is always based on the individual stations.
The highest traffic hubs will allow the highest minimum amounts whilst abandoned stations will rarely allow minimum buy amounts above 1, this will also boost localized trading more as moguls will have a hard time servicing super-wide buy orders.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3585797#post3585797
Additionally I don't believe any penalties are necessary. |

Elsbeth Taron
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 17:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
If nothing is broken, nothing needs fixing.
Margin trading isn't broken. |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
487
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 19:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Simple, fail a margin order and you lose the ISK. Consider it the same as losing pvp and your ship going boom.
After all trading is market pvp so lets put some consequences in.
And if you dont like the thought because you make such use, its the same as flying what you cant afford to lose. |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
410
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 19:05:00 -
[11] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:I'm not aware if these ideas have been posted or not, so with that said here goes:
As many players are aware, there is a serious problem in the game with margin trading scamming going on. I wasn't aware, please do explain the problem! AFAIK when a margin trader "defaults" on his buyorder, your sell is rejected, meaning you retain your goods.
Am I mistaken? Are you able to order on margin, "default" and get the sellers' goods? Is there something I missed here? |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15524
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 19:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
The only problem that needs fixing, is the poor judgement that some people make when investing their ISK. Margin trading is not broken, or in any way needing of a fix.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4066
|
Posted - 2013.09.08 22:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:Simple, fail a margin order and you lose the ISK. Consider it the same as losing pvp and your ship going boom.
You already do, so what's the problem?
Don't buy things for more than they're worth. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
487
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 00:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Simple, fail a margin order and you lose the ISK. Consider it the same as losing pvp and your ship going boom. You already do, so what's the problem? Don't buy things for more than they're worth. No Im saying the dude who put up the buy order, not just the one being scammed. Scammer gets baited and killed, normal trader with no liquidity can consider it the same as roaming a wh. This way the skill is useful, but like with everything there is risk.
Also because I want to here the scammers whine about how they lose billions on people falling for their scam and how they should get total profit from it. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4066
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 01:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:No Im saying the dude who put up the buy order, not just the one being scammed. Scammer gets baited and killed, normal trader with no liquidity can consider it the same as roaming a wh. This way the skill is useful, but like with everything there is risk.
Also because I want to here the scammers whine about how they lose billions on people falling for their scam and how they should get total profit from it.
The person who attempts to sell goods doesn't lose anything.
The person with the buy order loses money.
That is already the case.
What's the problem? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1367
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 04:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:
As many players are aware, there is a serious problem in the game with margin trading scamming going on.
There is no problem with Margin Trading. There's a problem with greed, ignorance, and illiteracy; these three things are the primary cause of anyone allowing themselves to be scammed in any fashion at all. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1801
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 07:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:RubyPorto wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Simple, fail a margin order and you lose the ISK. Consider it the same as losing pvp and your ship going boom. You already do, so what's the problem? Don't buy things for more than they're worth. No Im saying the dude who put up the buy order, not just the one being scammed. Scammer gets baited and killed, normal trader with no liquidity can consider it the same as roaming a wh. This way the skill is useful, but like with everything there is risk. Also because I want to here the scammers whine about how they lose billions on people falling for their scam and how they should get total profit from it.
Why should he lose isk for an order that doesn't complete? Give me a single reason that isn't "because I'm butthurt and want other people to be punished for my greed and stupidity" |

William Bradley
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 01:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
Having waited a while for constructive replies to occur, and seeing none, I'll begrudgingly respond to the blatently deceptive responses of margin trade scammers trying to keep a broken system broken:
Mara Pahrdi wrote:All risks connected to the margin trading skill are just general risks of doing business in EVE. They fit perfectly well with the overall design of the game when it comes to trading. No, you are wrong; completely wrong. EVE is designed as more than a mere run of the mill MMO; it's a simulated universe. Your ignorant response is purposefully ignoring that fact to gloss over the inherent problem of in-game margin trade market fraud not being dealt with as it otherwise would be in a functioning world. It is the very reason I brought up the fraud angle in the first place. Looking at the game in terms of the characters as people acting within a real-world economy, anyone perpetrating the margin trade scams would very quickly find themselves on the losing-end of heavy fines, lawsuits, and/or extensive jail sentences.
Under the currently broken system, the only people who lose due to margin trade scams are the victims of said scams; there are no real or meaningful consequences for the perpetrators of those scams, and that is the point of my suggestions. Without the protection systems that should be in place, margin trade scammers are left scott-free to bloat the market with fraudulent orders that have an exactly 0% chance of being fulfilled due to the abuse of the system's current mechanics. That is not a correctly functioning or sensible system; it's flat-out broken.
Mara Pahrdi wrote:If you have been scammed and want to have revenge, get the required intel and strike back with any means you deem appropriate.
If you can't be bothered, just deal with it. I sincerely hope that you end up the victim of a severe financial loss in the real world, so that you can feel the full weight of the ignorance of your statement. "You can get revenge" is not in any way a logical or reasonable reason to resist fixing a broken system, nor is "If you can't be bothered, just deal with it" a logical or reasonable defense for people who manipulate systems to steal from and abuse other people. Furthermore, your disgustingly disingenuous response ever so flippantly glosses over the fact that "revenge" in EVE Online is utterly meaningless; there is no way for the players to truly exact the level of justice on scammers that said scammers deserve to receive.
Arya Regnar wrote:As long as the deposits don't cover the total amount this will continue to be a scam. And full deposits would cripple market marvelously for people that don't sit on trillions. You've failed to correctly read and understand the point of my second suggestion. I did not say that full deposits should be required for all margin orders; I said that if it were done for the player's largest order, it would help provide some measure of margin trade scam protection by at least trying to ensure the largest margin order in that player's wallet will succeed, and in doing so would also provide protection for the smaller margin orders in their wallet and all without requiring the player's full set of margin orders to be covered.
Ssoraszh Tzarszh wrote:While it is something of a bother, this so called 'scam' or 'exploit' only works because of greedy people who did not do their research. No, you are wrong; the only reason the scam works is because there are no meaningful protection systems built into the market to deal with such blatant fraud. Furthermore, it's nonsense to blame the victims of a scam as being greedy when it is the greed of the scammers themselves that create the scams in the first place. If the system were set up to appropriately punish players for market fraud, there would be considerably less margin trade scamming going on, and then the system could be left for it's very real and intended purpose - to allow honest traders to increase their working capital and conduct market operations on a larger level than they otherwise would be able to. Your arguments are counter-intuitive to that point and reveal your underlying intentions; you're not interested in protecting the margin trade system for honest traders - you just want to ensure that scammers can continue to abuse the markets and players for their own gain.
Scammers wrote: Sable Moran wrote: Putting it in another way. You want CCP to add a not insignificant amount of game breaking new code into the game to prevent greedy people from having their arses handed to them?
TheGunslinger42 wrote: I have a better proposal: Don't be greedy, and put in a little bit of effort before blindly buying up expensive things hoping to make a huge quick profit
Mag's wrote: The only problem that needs fixing, is the poor judgement that some people make when investing their ISK. Margin trading is not broken, or in any way needing of a fix.
Domanique Altares wrote: There is no problem with Margin Trading. There's a problem with greed, ignorance, and illiteracy; these three things are the primary cause of anyone allowing themselves to be scammed in any fashion at all.
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Why should he lose isk for an order that doesn't complete? Give me a single reason that isn't "because I'm butthurt and want other people to be punished for my greed and stupidity"
As I said above, all of these statements are nonsense; blaming the victims of scams as greedy is nonsense since it is the greed of the scammer in the first place that creates these problems. It is highly likely that you are all just a margin trade scammers trying to prevent a broken system from being fixed. |

Elizabeth Aideron
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
222
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 02:55:00 -
[19] - Quote
Margin trading scams only have a single obscure counter known as clicking the price history tab. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4068
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 07:13:00 -
[20] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:anyone perpetrating the margin trade scams would very quickly find themselves on the losing-end of heavy fines, lawsuits, and/or extensive jail sentences.
Except that scamming, extortion, most kinds of theft, fraud, cons, racketeering, and a whole host of other things that are crimes in the real world are perfectly legal in EVE. As you said, EVE is a simulated universe. It has its own laws. Stop trying to apply laws from other universes to it.
Quote:it's flat-out broken.
The Failed Margin order costs the person who put it up ISK. The person who tried to sell to it is left entirely whole. They have lost nothing.
What's broken?
You lost the money when you bought the overpriced goods.
EVE's not a happy fun place where the game protects you from your own stupidity, and it's not meant to be.
Quote:I sincerely hope that you end up the victim of a severe financial loss in the real world, so that you can feel the full weight of the ignorance of your statement.
Ooohm the "I can't distinguish between real life and fantasy and therefor wish real world harm on people who disagree with me on the internet" argument.
EVE is all about DIY Justice. The real world is not. One is a video game, the other is not.
Quote:No, you are wrong; the only reason the scam works is because there are no meaningful protection systems built into the market to deal with such blatant fraud.
Once again, Fraud is legal among capsuleers. Besides that, there's a whole second tab in the market window that, if clicked on, jumps up and down and shouts "This is a Margin scam" when appropriate.
Quote:and then the system could be left for it's very real and intended purpose [Citation Needed]
Scams and Cons only work when someone allows their greed for "too good to be true" returns on their investment/time/effort/etc to prevent them from doing the (often dead simple) legwork to reveal the scam for what it's worth (in this case, you have to press a single button uncover the scam). There's an old saying in the confidence business: "You can't con an honest mark." "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
228
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 07:44:00 -
[21] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:As I said above, all of these statements are nonsense; blaming the victims of scams as greedy is nonsense
They are not victims of scams, they are victims of greed, plain and simple.
William Bradley wrote:since it is the greed of the scammer in the first place that creates these problems.
Most likely this scam is used because of the amount of tears it generates. Any and all monetary gains are just a nice bonus.
William Bradley wrote:It is highly likely that you are all just a margin trade scammers trying to prevent a broken system from being fixed.
So just because I'm opposing your silly ideas makes me a scammer? Sterling argumentation :) Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

Verity Sovereign
Sovereign Fleet Tax Shelter
517
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 10:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
In IRL, there are severe penalties if you can't cover your margins...
There should always be a certain % of the ISK in escrow as long as the buy order is up. When a margin call comes and they can't cover, this ISK should be lost to them forever.
Just as we have "security standings", perhaps we should have "credit ratings" Fail to cover a margin -> hit to your credit rating.
Margin trading would require the trader to have a positive credit rating. The higher your credit rating, the less you need to put in escrow.
Also, buy orders (maybe sell orders too) would list the credit rating of the toon who set it up |

Electrique Wizard
Mutually Lucrative Business Proposals Market and Contract PVP
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 10:42:00 -
[23] - Quote
Margin trading is fine as it is. Every now and then an angry highsec dweller comes along and cries about life not being fair, about there not being anything in the "SupriseBoxes", about his 15 bil atron being ganked outside jita 4-4, about a bag of rare crap bought in local not really being worth 2 bil on the market buy orders.
Eve isnt fair and it never should be fair. |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family
80
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 11:06:00 -
[24] - Quote
It isn't broken and the scams are so obvious it is painful. Especially the ones that spam in local with the scam . It doesn't need fixing and people that lose isk to this deserve it. The skill is required for most traders to function efficiently. If a "fix" is really needed then maybe lose a percentage of the escrow for a failed market order. This would at least let us punish the noisy spamming guys by failing their orders for them but likely leave the subtler ones in place. At 5-10% of escrow posted would maybe also add a level to market PVP by trying to catch out overextended traders by calling their bluff on how many buy orders they have up. Anyway it is fine as it is and if they change it to what i have just written that is also fine. Fixing it to protect the idiots who fall for this is not fine though. |

Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
123
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 11:24:00 -
[25] - Quote
You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). |

Iorga Eeta
Hekatonkheires Industries
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 12:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
Really, you want a measure of creditworthiness of the buyers. Is this a margin buy order? Has that buyer defaulted on other buy orders?
Unfortunately, the market system doesn't tell you whom your buying and selling from before you purchase or sell an item. But a flag on the buy order, like "MO" or some such would be a good indicator.
First, though, you simply shouldn't trust any order that has a minimum buy amount greater than 1.
After that, you can start your own website, like eve-scammers.com, or something, and allow people to post buyer and selling ratings and report bad buy and sell orders. |

Infiltrator2112
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 12:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
Training Common-Sense to level 2 should fix your problem with this "scam".
It is easy enough to avoid beeing scammed by checking the market details on the specific item either using the ingame market and out-of-game tools. No need to fix what isn't broken. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
501
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 14:00:00 -
[28] - Quote
Iorga Eeta wrote: First, though, you simply shouldn't trust any order that has a minimum buy amount greater than 1.
Why? If someone is buying x of something across a region they might not want to pick it up in small quantities. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15524
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 14:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Scammers wrote: Sable Moran wrote: Putting it in another way. You want CCP to add a not insignificant amount of game breaking new code into the game to prevent greedy people from having their arses handed to them?
TheGunslinger42 wrote: I have a better proposal: Don't be greedy, and put in a little bit of effort before blindly buying up expensive things hoping to make a huge quick profit
Mag's wrote: The only problem that needs fixing, is the poor judgement that some people make when investing their ISK. Margin trading is not broken, or in any way needing of a fix.
Domanique Altares wrote: There is no problem with Margin Trading. There's a problem with greed, ignorance, and illiteracy; these three things are the primary cause of anyone allowing themselves to be scammed in any fashion at all.
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Why should he lose isk for an order that doesn't complete? Give me a single reason that isn't "because I'm butthurt and want other people to be punished for my greed and stupidity"
As I said above, all of these statements are nonsense; blaming the victims of scams as greedy is nonsense since it is the greed of the scammer in the first place that creates these problems. It is highly likely that you are all just a margin trade scammers trying to prevent a broken system from being fixed. I don't even have the margin trader skill injected, let alone use it on any character I use.
Your fundamental problem seems to be your lack of understanding how this scam works, therefore missing the ways that are already available to avoid being caught out.
Price checking an item, is not gained by taking the over priced buy order as the correct value of an item. You need more knowledge of an items price, gained from the market in different regions. If you only take the buy order as the indicator, or choose not to gain more knowledge, you are to blame.
The actual scam relies upon you buying the overpriced items. So if you do have the knowledge required to make investments, you would avoid such over priced items. But being caught out, simply means you paid over the odds for something, which was your fault. You still have those items and can sell them, but at a loss. A loss which was your fault, due to lack of knowledge.
The whole point is that those who dive into these deals, do so thinking they are going to make a quick buck. A quick buck off someone, who has seemingly sold an item for less then someone else seems to want to pay for it. It seems that greed for some in these situations, takes precedence over knowledge. This is their undoing and they only have themselves to blame.
Oh and Eve is a harsh dark universe, please don't try to compare it to real life because that's ridiculous.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Doddy
Dark-Rising
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 15:08:00 -
[30] - Quote
William Bradley wrote: In the real world, such an action has a single term: Fraud.
Man, what country do you live in that saying you want to buy something then not buying it is fraud? In the civilised world that is a customers privilege.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1808
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 16:07:00 -
[31] - Quote
It's fun to watch the nutters compare EVE to real life. Market manipulation or fraud is illegal in the real world, and a bad thing that should be prevented. Sure. So is murder, theft, other forms of scamming, etc. They're all allowed in EVE because it's a game. You can't drag real world laws and morals into this because it's a game. The fact you seem to not understand the difference is incredibly scary.
People who put up these margin trading orders lose money if the order fails. Nothing more needs to be done.
Well one thing needs to be done: You need to do your research when playing the markets, this is your fault and your fault alone. It is not a problem with mechanics.
Tears for the tear bucket please |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
412
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 16:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
Alphea Abbra wrote:William Bradley wrote:I'm not aware if these ideas have been posted or not, so with that said here goes:
As many players are aware, there is a serious problem in the game with margin trading scamming going on. I wasn't aware, please do explain the problem! AFAIK when a margin trader "defaults" on his buyorder, your sell is rejected, meaning you retain your goods. Am I mistaken? Are you able to order on margin, "default" and get the sellers' goods? Is there something I missed here? Now that OP is insulting his own intelligence, can he try to answer this? |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4072
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 16:41:00 -
[33] - Quote
Verity Sovereign wrote:In IRL, there are severe penalties if you can't cover your margins...
In real life, trading on margin is using borrowed money to buy things. If I lose the borrowed money, the bank loses the money they loaned me.
In EVE, the margin trading skill has nothing to do with borrowing money. If I can't complete the escrow, the only thing that happens is that I'm out the broker fee without having a completed transaction to show for it. The seller is left entirely whole, having lost nothing due to the order failing.
And that's where that particular argument falls apart. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1381
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 17:44:00 -
[34] - Quote
William Bradley wrote: As I said above, all of these statements are nonsense; blaming the victims of scams as greedy is nonsense since it is the greed of the scammer in the first place that creates these problems. It is highly likely that you are all just a margin trade scammers trying to prevent a broken system from being fixed.
They are the only ones to be blamed. They chose to be a victim, and what's more, they chose it when they purchased an overpriced item on the market or from a contract, without bothering to properly research the item in question. Their money was lost before they ever tried to sell to a failed buy order. The fact that said buy order provided an enticement is of no account. There are many reasons that buy order may fail, to include being issued on an unbacked margin; if someone has so little self control that they cannot take a moment to research what they are buying into in hopes of turning a profit, then they have absolutely no one to blame for it but themselves. The tools are available to everyone. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

William Bradley
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 18:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you. |

Verity Sovereign
Sovereign Fleet Tax Shelter
521
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 18:44:00 -
[36] - Quote
FWIW, I've lost *time* to these "scams"
I think once I saw a Phantasm with a buy order for 125 million, and in dodi I saw many sell orders for about 15 mill less not too far away in Dodi.
I figured I could ferry some Phantasms over there, sell them, and make a bit of a profit - Nope, I was left with Phantasm purchased at market value. They've gone up in price since then (due to inflation), so no big deal. (there was a 2nd buy order up for Phantasms at a fraction of market value, I think the scam there was for people not paying attention when they try to sell)
I don't necessarily consider it greed, people provide a service by moving stuff to where it is wanted. |

Elizabeth Aideron
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
232
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 18:49:00 -
[37] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you.
http://i.imgur.com/YJyZGTj.jpg |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
412
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 18:53:00 -
[38] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you. "Projection" is a term that comes to mind. And that makes it easy to conclude your personality:
Quote:such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world. Don't judge yourself too harsh. Your lack of integrity and your ability to project your faults unto others is deplorable, but don't worry too much. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4074
|
Posted - 2013.09.10 23:27:00 -
[39] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point.
"I can't respond to anything anyone's said, so I'll just dismiss it."
Quote:There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement.
"The only reason people are arguing contrary to my position is that they have an untoward interest in the outcome."
Quote:That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
"Your actions in a game carry the same moral weight as actions in the real world, thus taking a Queen in Chess should have you hanged on a count of Regicide."
Quote:I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you.
"Bad people in EVE are all Sociopaths in real life."
BINGO! "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
489
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 02:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
So tell me why this margin trading skill should be introduced? What precisely does it cover and allow to benefit the game? |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4077
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 03:35:00 -
[41] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:So tell me why this margin trading skill should be introduced? What precisely does it cover and allow to benefit the game?
It allows market traders without 10s of billions of spare ISK to usefully take part in slower markets. It allows market traders without 10s of billions of ISK to make a reasonable income by trading. It allows market traders without 10s of billions of ISK to compete. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Lukas Rox
Aideron Technologies
29
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 04:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
Margin Trading scams exist because people trust the market too much. In 99.9% of orders they complete, so new players quickly learn to trust the market. And then out of a sudden it fails them, leaving them with an item they never wanted in the first place.
IMO what should be changed is Aura should say something about "dont trust buy orders" in the tutorial:
"Market buy orders can sometimes fail, for example when the buyer does not have enough money to cover the order. Some people can deliberately use this against you."
And that's it I think. If someone didn't run the tutorial, then they can be blamed for their ignorance. Blogging about EVE on http://pozniak.pl/ |

Bigg Gun
Flying Bags Inc. Bulgarian Space Federation
31
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 04:53:00 -
[43] - Quote
Hmm didn't read through all that crap, but here's how it could work: The seller receives a message: "The item you're trying to sell is being bought on margin and there's not enough money at the moment to cover it, would you like to sell it anyway and wait until the buyer deposits the sum?" If yes the item is being held in the market. At the same time the buyer's account goes into the negative. He can't put new buy orders until he pays off the item.
Voila |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4077
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 05:00:00 -
[44] - Quote
Bigg Gun wrote:Hmm didn't read through all that crap, but here's how it could work: The seller receives a message: "The item you're trying to sell is being bought on margin and there's not enough money at the moment to cover it, would you like to sell it anyway and wait until the buyer deposits the sum?" If yes the item is being held in the market. At the same time the buyer's account goes into the negative. He can't put new buy orders until he pays off the item.
Voila
Hoooray, Free, infinite ISK faucet.
Oh, and the "Margin Trading Skill" and "Trading on Margin" are two entirely unrelated things. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15525
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:09:00 -
[45] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you. It's quite clear that you can only reply with ad hom attacks. Although already clear to most, your use of these personsl attacks only highlights that your stance/argument is weak and without foundation.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
415
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 10:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
Lukas Rox wrote:Margin Trading scams exist because people trust the market too much. In 99.9% of orders they complete, so new players quickly learn to trust the market. And then out of a sudden it fails them, leaving them with an item they never wanted in the first place.
IMO what should be changed is Aura should say something about "dont trust buy orders" in the tutorial:
"Market buy orders can sometimes fail, for example when the buyer does not have enough money to cover the order. Some people can deliberately use this against you."
And that's it I think. If someone didn't run the tutorial, then they can be blamed for their ignorance. I'm all for making the tutorial more informative, but if newbies have the isk to buy a contract (Often in many multiple-digit millions or even billions) then they want the item enough to pay for it. If they pay for little-traded with the intention of selling to ridiculous overpriced buyorders and end up either having to sell at more regular market values or keep a module, they wanted the potential profit enough to risk buying the contract. I have nothing against the sentence you suggested. I find it fine and helpful in general while not too handholding. There could even be added a line about contracts & containers without too much trouble. My concern is that it could become too much handholding. Giving the tools to learn when you're about to be scammed (And a general "be careful, you can be scammed in EVE") is good - and your suggested sentence would do that fine. I just wanted to be sure that this was articulated, so that it does not enter the area of slippery slopes. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1814
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 11:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you.
It's not cheating, we're not scumbags, general ad hominem attacks just demonstrate how weak and desperate your arguments are.
There is no issue at all with the margin trading. If you buy something, try to sell it to an order that was made using margin trading and which then fails, you don't lose anything. You keep the item(s) you tried to sell and nothing happens. The person who put up the buy order losese some isk.
You have yet to explain why this is an issue, and why it needs changing.
Say it with me: You keep the items, and the failed buy order costs the other person isk.
That is more than reasonable if you ask me.
The only reason you are ranting is because you initially overpaid for the item you tried to sell. How is that anyones fault except your own? No one held a spacegun to your head and made you buy it. There are also tools within the game that allow you to judge whether the amount you're paying for it is reasonable.
So what is the problem again? |

Fourteen Maken
The House of JuIii
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 11:29:00 -
[48] - Quote
I was close to falling for this scam myself , but I knew something was up so I asked a member of my corp who explained it to me. It's one of the more subtle scams, but even the isk doubling thing catches some folks out there's no way to save some people from their own naivety, there will always be somebody somewhere willing to buy bridges off nigerian princes over the telephone. |

brinelan
The Flying Dead Insidious Empire
95
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 16:59:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lephia DeGrande wrote:You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course).
you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item sorted by date, has low and high price and even a large colorful graph.. oh wait... |

Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
129
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 17:17:00 -
[50] - Quote
brinelan wrote:Lephia DeGrande wrote:You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item sorted by date, has low and high price and even a large colorful graph.. oh wait...
I dont have problems with scaming it was just a small idea to speed up the process and give the player more information that matters. |

Mer88
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 17:37:00 -
[51] - Quote
what it needs is warning to new players about the scam. i am sure everyone will get scamed once before we knew about what this scam really do. The unlucky ones will put all their isk into buying something that seem for sure would make a profit then realize their whole bank account is gone. These kind of scam is impossible for the people to detec unless you were told before. it is almost like a contract to sell a mach for 2million isk then you accept the contract and boom your just lost a mach in your hanger because the guy had a skill call bait and swtich trained to lvl 5 which will change the contract from selling to buying.
These kind of scams where are skills related should be warned to players by CCP because even a very careful person will get scammed. there is no way to know unless you know about the skill. |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
420
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 21:22:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mer88 wrote:what it needs is warning to new players about the scam. i am sure everyone will get scamed once before we knew about what this scam really do. The unlucky ones will put all their isk into buying something that seem for sure would make a profit then realize their whole bank account is gone. These kind of scam is impossible for the people to detec unless you were told before. Wrong. You can check the market and know it before buying.
Quote:it is almost like a contract to sell a mach for 2million isk then you accept the contract and boom your just lost a mach in your hanger because the guy had a skill call bait and swtich trained to lvl 5 which will change the contract from selling to buying. No. Those are almost entirely unlike each other.
Quote:These kind of scams where are skills related should be warned to players by CCP because even a very careful person will get scammed. there is no way to know unless you know about the skill. A careful person won't get scammed. A less careful person will only get scammed if he/she wants a potential profit more and faster than checking it over. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4097
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 22:00:00 -
[53] - Quote
Lephia DeGrande wrote:brinelan wrote:Lephia DeGrande wrote:You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item sorted by date, has low and high price and even a large colorful graph.. oh wait... I dont have problems with scaming it was just a small idea to speed up the process and give the player more information that matters.
The UI gives you the following information for every single item on the market: The highest and lowest transaction prices for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The median transaction price for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The volume of transactions for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) A trailing 5d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A trailing 20d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A list of all open bids and asks with their remaining duration (and their last update time, by proxy) (table only)
What more information could you possibly want? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Lephia DeGrande
Luxembourg Space Union
130
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 22:27:00 -
[54] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Lephia DeGrande wrote:brinelan wrote:Lephia DeGrande wrote:You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item sorted by date, has low and high price and even a large colorful graph.. oh wait... I dont have problems with scaming it was just a small idea to speed up the process and give the player more information that matters. The UI gives you the following information for every single item on the market: The highest and lowest transaction prices for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The median transaction price for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The volume of transactions for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) A trailing 5d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A trailing 20d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A list of all open bids and asks with their remaining duration (and their last update time, by proxy) (table only) What more information could you possibly want?
Still dont get it? Its about >REDESIGN< the UI...  |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4099
|
Posted - 2013.09.11 22:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lephia DeGrande wrote:RubyPorto wrote:The UI gives you the following information for every single item on the market: The highest and lowest transaction prices for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The median transaction price for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) The volume of transactions for each and every day of the last year (table or graph) A trailing 5d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A trailing 20d average transaction price for the last year (graph only) A list of all open bids and asks with their remaining duration (and their last update time, by proxy) (table only)
What more information could you possibly want? Still dont get it? Its about >REDESIGN< the UI... 
Ok, what better way is there to present that information than your choice of a graph or table? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

brinelan
The Flying Dead Insidious Empire
95
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 13:41:00 -
[56] - Quote
So you cant sell an item to a buy order, you are out no money when you cannot sell the item to the buy order.. whats the problem? And no, it is not ccp's job to hold your hand the entire time you play. If you want hand holding, go back to wow.
If you bought an item that was that overpriced that's your problem, not the failed buy order. Don' be greedy and you wont fall for these. |

Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve The Fourth District
499
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 14:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
I'm fully in support of anything to fix the margin trade scam. I don't want to see all scamming removed from EVE as it is a part of it, however the margin trade scam has nothing to alert a playing to it being a scam unless they know about that exact scam.
ISK doubling, contract and item switch scams all have clear information or are based on trust in the party you're dealing with meaning the fault of falling for these scams is in the hands of the player who doesn't check them correctly.
Margin trade scams however have no indication at all and I have known many veteran players who have fallen for it because they had no idea it was possible. When you see something for sale for lower than someone is buying it you assume the market isn't open to abuse for scamming.
OP's ideas are a good trail of thought and better than most peoples requests to simply remove the skill from the game. Lieutenant Turelus
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
The Fourth District |

Sam Alkawe
We are not bad. Just unlucky Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.09.12 14:52:00 -
[58] - Quote
Turelus wrote:I'm fully in support of anything to fix the margin trade scam. I don't want to see all scamming removed from EVE as it is a part of it, however the margin trade scam has nothing to alert a playing to it being a scam unless they know about that exact scam.
ISK doubling, contract and item switch scams all have clear information or are based on trust in the party you're dealing with meaning the fault of falling for these scams is in the hands of the player who doesn't check them correctly.
Margin trade scams however have no indication at all and I have known many veteran players who have fallen for it because they had no idea it was possible. When you see something for sale for lower than someone is buying it you assume the market isn't open to abuse for scamming.
OP's ideas are a good trail of thought and better than most peoples requests to simply remove the skill from the game.
I would think that is the beauty of the scam. The fact that even experienced players can get caught in it unless they learn about the scam is very nice. Sure, maybe there could be a few changes to the way the market works, but the scam by itself should exist IMO. Baiting somebody to buy something overpriced could be done without the Margin trading, albeit with a lot more risk to it (or not as many benefits). Bonus points if you can control access to the station (such as camping gates and station to kill anything that wants to sell there) among other things. |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
421
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 11:42:00 -
[59] - Quote
Turelus wrote:I'm fully in support of anything to fix the margin trade scam. I don't want to see all scamming removed from EVE as it is a part of it, however the margin trade scam has nothing to alert a playing to it being a scam unless they know about that exact scam.
ISK doubling, contract and item switch scams all have clear information or are based on trust in the party you're dealing with meaning the fault of falling for these scams is in the hands of the player who doesn't check them correctly.
Margin trade scams however have no indication at all and I have known many veteran players who have fallen for it because they had no idea it was possible. When you see something for sale for lower than someone is buying it you assume the market isn't open to abuse for scamming.
OP's ideas are a good trail of thought and better than most peoples requests to simply remove the skill from the game. Please explain what issues there are with margin trading? When you sell to an order that fails, do you lose the stuff you're selling? |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
614
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 13:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
brinelan wrote:Lephia DeGrande wrote:You want less Scam? Improve the UI so can Identity scams faster (if your able to read of course). you mean like adding a tab that shows you the sales history of that item sorted by date, has low and high price and even a large colorful graph.. oh wait... Most items used for margin trade scams have either no buy history or a scam buy history, so they look legit.
Margin trade scams do suck pretty hard though. Those of us with market knowledge know about this kind of thing, but often you see a newbie with no idea it's even possible. Since there is nowhere that explains this to a newbie, they see a sure fire way to make profit, then they lose out. Not because they did anything particularly stupid, but they believed the numbers the system showed them.
So with that in mind, I'd suggest simply adding an "isk in escrow" column to the market buy orders, that shows how much is in escrow (or the order amount total is it was all in escrow). At least this would give an indicator that something was amiss so they could go find out what it means. If they chose to ignore that and still bought they items, that's tough luck. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Drake Doe
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
267
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 14:15:00 -
[61] - Quote
Why does no one find it moderately suspicious when someone is selling a module for less than a buy order? What would that person gain for earning less isk and having to wait longer for said isk? To me, this applies to contracts that look too good to be true, and turn out to be scams. All the proposals here do is literally tell the person it's a scam, yet claim that people will still fall for it. If a newbie falls for it, they fell for it because they didn't listen to the tutorials (I almost certainly remember a tutorial mentioning being wary of "good deals" from scammers, pirates, etc., but I might be mistaken.) This thread seems to be full of people, who aren't new players, that fell for a scam and are using newbies as a scapegoat to change the system in their favor. "The homogenization of EVE began when Gallente and Caldari started sharing a weapon system."---Vermaak Doe-- "Ohh squabbles ohh I love my dust trolls like watching an episode of Maury with less " Is he my Dad " but more of " My Neighbor took a dump on my lawn " good episode! *pops more corn*" ---Evernub-- |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15526
|
Posted - 2013.09.13 14:46:00 -
[62] - Quote
Turelus wrote:I'm fully in support of anything to fix the margin trade scam. I don't want to see all scamming removed from EVE as it is a part of it, however the margin trade scam has nothing to alert a playing to it being a scam unless they know about that exact scam.
ISK doubling, contract and item switch scams all have clear information or are based on trust in the party you're dealing with meaning the fault of falling for these scams is in the hands of the player who doesn't check them correctly.
Margin trade scams however have no indication at all and I have known many veteran players who have fallen for it because they had no idea it was possible. When you see something for sale for lower than someone is buying it you assume the market isn't open to abuse for scamming.
OP's ideas are a good trail of thought and better than most peoples requests to simply remove the skill from the game. And the point you and others seemingly forget to mention, is that they have to buy an overpriced item first. Which just so happens to be something you CAN check.
If you wish to invest in the market, then a certain amount of knowledge is required. This does not mean taking that buy/sell order price, as your only piece of knowledge. It means looking closer at the market and checking if what you are buying, does in fact cost that much.
People dive into these deals, thinking they are getting a great deal and will make some good ISK of another pilot. But in a market that is PvP based, they have bested you due to your lack of due diligence.
TL: DR: Don't blame the Margin Trader Skill, if you paid over the odds for an item without getting all the relevant information first.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Montevius Williams
The Scope Gallente Federation
578
|
Posted - 2013.10.04 23:12:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mara Pahrdi wrote:I'll be honest. My personal view is, that the skill is working fine as it is. Though increased broker fees in general would probably be a good thing.
All risks connected to the margin trading skill are just general risks of doing business in EVE. They fit perfectly well with the overall design of the game when it comes to trading.
If you have been scammed and want to have revenge, get the required intel and strike back with any means you deem appropriate.
If you can't be bothered, just deal with it.
I disagree. What is the risk for the person placing the buy order? If noone buys, he can simply cancel the order and get his isk back.
The Margin trading skill is broken and not being used as intended. They need to either get rid of it, or make a mechanic that allows it to work. Im all for scamming in EVE, but using the actual in game market to do so is a bit much. The market should pretty much be locked down tight by the Devs. They got 5 real time economists watching the the EVE market yet due to a loophole, you bypass all the monitoring/mechanics.
Also, the fact that you cant SEE who is scamming you is even more ridiculous. At least with Contracts, I know who I am dealing with before hand. With Margin Trading, I have no idea until after the fact. It' not hardcore, it's not brutal, it's not EVE, it's just stupid. "The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1095
|
Posted - 2013.10.05 00:07:00 -
[64] - Quote
Quote:The Margin trading skill is broken and not being used as intended.
They have outright stated that it is, actually. Ever few months or so though, some new dumbass dredges up the topic again anyway. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 23:39:00 -
[65] - Quote
Personally i find scams unpleasant, however.... Eve is also a fascinating social experiment too and that i do find very interesting,what happens and how do people behave when offered a universe where the restrictions that we grew up with are removed or subtly modified. We learn this if we move to another country and the laws we know are different with new risks and opportunities, some thrive and some lock the door and dream of going home. There is no doubt we are in a different universe and that is made very very clear, what sort of person will you be when you actually have the restrictions removed? You can learn a lot about yourself and be very suprised, The only thing that is missing is a good revenge mechanic that lets you go after the main and not the alt then we can really discover how nasty we can be. There are definitely some i would like to go thermonuclear on..... Just for the lutz. |

epicurus ataraxia
Unchained Industrial Collective Defiance Enterprises
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 00:06:00 -
[66] - Quote
A follow on , don't feel bad about getting caught, there are so many scams, some downright sneaky and some quite intelligent, I myself fell into a well planned intelligent version of this, he placed a buy order in one region and a sell order in another station (actually 5 of them) in the next region so you feel that you have gained a trading advantage, he wasn't greedy 2 or 3 million per unit. He did dozens a day so it looked right in the buy history until you went to sell.......thankfully i only tried one rather than filling my cargo hold as something did not smell quite right..... Hey at least you can sell it where you bought it for a small loss. However greed will get you every time........ |

Judith Frozenvoid
Cryogenic Consultancy
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 05:27:00 -
[67] - Quote
let the buyer and the seller beware. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Forsak3n.
610
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 08:25:00 -
[68] - Quote
The only change that needs to happen to margin trading is if the buyer doesn't have the money, the seller shouldn't lose the goods. If that is how it already works, then ignore me. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
447
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 12:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:The only change that needs to happen to margin trading is if the buyer doesn't have the money, the seller shouldn't lose the goods. If that is how it already works, then ignore me. Then I'll ignore you. (Since yes, it already works like that. You don't get what you don't pay for.) |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1488
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 12:42:00 -
[70] - Quote
boy this thread delivers...
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Velicitia
Emergent Avionics
1643
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 12:49:00 -
[71] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:However greed will get you every time........
This, so very much this ... both in game and out (amirite, CCP )
Only acceptable fox for the margin trading scam is "If it looks too good to be true, it is"
One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1195
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 13:04:00 -
[72] - Quote
While I don't agree that margin trading needs a "fix", it really is just people falling to greed, I do wonder why margin trading is still as it is. Mainly because EVE tends to drive player involvement, while margin trading contrast starkly against it. Margin trading is essentially a safe way of borrowing isk to pre-order goods. Why is margin trading an automatic function, rather than a player driven mechanic? A player driven mechanic would require players to earn trust in order to do things, the way it should be. With the current system, any character training the skills is automatically granted that trust. It feels to me no different from the idea of an eve NPC bank, which people are usually against as it removes player driven content. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Velicitia
Emergent Avionics
1643
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 13:20:00 -
[73] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:While I don't agree that margin trading needs a "fix", it really is just people falling to greed, I do wonder why margin trading is still as it is. Mainly because EVE tends to drive player involvement, while margin trading contrast starkly against it. Margin trading is essentially a safe way of borrowing isk to pre-order goods. Why is margin trading an automatic function, rather than a player driven mechanic? A player driven mechanic would require players to earn trust in order to do things, the way it should be. With the current system, any character training the skills is automatically granted that trust. It feels to me no different from the idea of an eve NPC bank, which people are usually against as it removes player driven content.
I think it's mostly because the market itself is "outside" of the players hands (i.e. it's run by the NPC brokers).
That said, I believe the player created and run bulk trade mailing list/channel allows for buying on margin (and futures as well)... One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia |

The Spod
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
98
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 13:49:00 -
[74] - Quote
Margin trading scam is simply an exploit; for all purposes the game mechanics should not allow a trade to fizzle if you see the isk on buy order you should expect to get it. The integrity of the market requires it.
The issue naturally is with differentiating phases of the scam as the heist happens in a different trade to the margin fizzle. There is nothing wrong with putting out overpriced stuff. There is definitely everything wrong in putting out overpriced buy orders with the knowledge it won't come to fruition.
CCP has to rule knowledgeably setting up fizzling orders an exploit first and foremost. Then handle it case by case with banhammer ultimatums. This moves the risk to margin trader, not the one who thinks he can sell stuff to buy orders at the specified price (as he should be able to).
Manually doing the bait and recall is not an exploit but for all purposes can go under the banhammer with no detrimental impact to the game.
EDIT: the burden of knowing the rules has to be foremost on the scammer by common sense. (playstyles) |

Velicitia
Emergent Avionics
1644
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 14:05:00 -
[75] - Quote
The Spod wrote:Margin trading scam is simply an exploit; for all purposes the game mechanics should not allow a trade to fizzle if you see the isk on buy order you should expect to get it. The integrity of the market requires it.
The issue naturally is with differentiating phases of the scam as the heist happens in a different trade to the margin fizzle. There is nothing wrong with putting out overpriced stuff. There is definitely everything wrong in putting out overpriced buy orders with the knowledge it won't come to fruition.
CCP has to rule knowledgeably setting up fizzling orders an exploit first and foremost. Then handle it case by case with banhammer ultimatums. This moves the risk to margin trader, not the one who thinks he can sell stuff to buy orders at the specified price (as he should be able to).
Manually doing the bait and recall is not an exploit but for all purposes can go under the banhammer with no detrimental impact to the game.
EDIT: the burden of knowing the rules has to be foremost on the scammer by common sense. (playstyles)
So, what you're saying is that if my order for 300 million isk worth of Trit I set up last month falls through because someone entirely filled a billion ISK worth of other mins unexpectedly ... I get classed as "exploiting" the system and a banhammer?
One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia |

The Spod
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
98
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 14:26:00 -
[76] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:The Spod wrote: CCP has to rule knowledgeably setting up fizzling orders an exploit first and foremost. Then handle it case by case with banhammer ultimatums.
So, what you're saying is that if my order for 300 million isk worth of Trit I set up last month falls through because someone entirely filled a billion ISK worth of other mins unexpectedly ... I get classed as "exploiting" the system and a banhammer?
Nope. See the non satiric short quotation above. |

Velicitia
Emergent Avionics
1644
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 14:36:00 -
[77] - Quote
ah ... so, how is CCP supposed to determine whether or not it's "willfully not having enough ISK" then? One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1197
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 14:42:00 -
[78] - Quote
The only change I'd make to margin trade is adding a column to state the amount in escrow for the order (probably as a %). It's not unrealistic to have that information, and it would not stop stupid people falling for trade scams.
See the problem with margin trading is that coming from other games, you won't know about it until after you've been scammed (or if you've read up on it specifically). It's not a common thing in games and it's never explained, so you are assumed to know that an order can fail. By adding a column to show the amount in escrow people would see it and say "I wonder what that means" then go find out. That doesn't mean an order with less than the full amount in escrow is a scam, it would just give you the information you need to make informed decisions.
tl;dr MT scams prey on lack of knowledge about game mechanics. Providing information that points to those mechanics allows a player to educate himself before falling prey to one, if he so wishes. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Decian Falx
Arcana Imperii Ltd. Strictly Unprofessional
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 23:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
The only thing that needs to be done to margin trading is making the 'fail' point the value of the sell order rather than the buy order.
Example:
Scammer has an item listed for 50m, buy price at 100m in Dodixie, minimum 5 items. Actual value of 1m. You go to Jita, pick up 5 of the items for 5 million.
You return to Dodixie, manually set the sell price to 24m each (minimum required in escrow w/ margin trading 5, at buy price of 100m). You press sell, the escrow alone covers the 24m*5=120m.
If you try this currently, the order fails anyway: It *seems* to check whether the scammer has the full offered amount rather than the amount asked.
In practical terms, this would mean it is risky (but NOT impossible) to scam people for more than about 4x the value of an item. The more money the scammer puts on the table, the more incentive for someone to counterscam them.
This is how it SHOULD be. The scam should not be impossible but bigger risks should mean bigger rewards. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4238
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 05:58:00 -
[80] - Quote
Decian Falx wrote:You return to Dodixie, manually set the sell price to 24m each (minimum required in escrow w/ margin trading 5, at buy price of 100m). You press sell, the escrow alone covers the 24m*5=120m.
If you try this currently, the order fails anyway: It *seems* to check whether the scammer has the full offered amount rather than the amount asked.
It does work like that. But you're not the first to think of that trick.
Buy order for 10, minimum 5, 100m/unit. Total order is 1b, escrow is 240m. Sell 5 to the order at 48m/unit. Total order is now 500m, escrow is now 0 ISK.
Now start spamming your 80m/unit sales contract. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
842
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 08:42:00 -
[81] - Quote
Now this thread has a lot of LOL in it, but the following is filled with so much fail......
William Bradley wrote:Since practically none of you are posting anything constructive on the matter and are merely regurgitating the same "I want to be able to cheat anyone I please; it's not my fault, it's their fault" scumbag rhetoric as always, I'm not going to be bothering to respond to such vapid posts beyond this point. There is no logical or reasonable argument being presented from any of you for why the margin trading system should not be fixed; your only obvious interest is in keeping the system as it is so that you can continue to exploit other players for your own sick amusement. That EVE Online is a game is no excuse for you to treat the real Human beings on the other end of each character as inanimate objects for you to use and abuse at your leisure; such an attitude is deplorable, and speaks to your lack of integrity in the real world.
I sincerely hope CCP does do something to fix the margin trading system, if for nothing else to protect the undeserving victims of such scams from the greed and bile of sociopaths like you.
While I agree that the margin trading skill can be (lets say) 'miss-used', It does have its uses. Also its easy to view the market history on items and spot the scams.
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |

Kara Trix
PVE Corporation
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 13:06:00 -
[82] - Quote
I was wondering why those orders happened, mostly in Jita. I have on a number of occasions fell for that trick...... yes, I admit it.... I'm greedy.
I think you just gave a lot of new players the idea to do it though... |

Careby
Careby Exploration
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 14:04:00 -
[83] - Quote
The margin trading skill is fine. In-game fraud is fine. Capitalizing on the greed of other players is fine.
What is not fine is flawed market information. Market information should be 100% reliable at the time it is displayed. If an order cannot possible execute, it should not be visible in the market screens.
If I have one million in available funds, and ten different one-million-isk buy orders, there is no problem showing my orders, because any one of those orders can be filled. But if I have one million in available funds, and a ten-million isk buy order, that order should not be visible in the market because it cannot possibly be filled. Showing the order only reduces the accuracy of the available information and undermines confidence in the market.
I don't see any need to cancel buy orders which are under-funded, just don't show them until the buyer has enough funds to cover them. If the buy order is for a multiple quantity, show the actual quantity that can be covered at the time the order is displayed.
|

Lena Lazair
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 14:08:00 -
[84] - Quote
The best possible solution to this was already proposed in another thread somewhere.
The only reason Margin Trading works in the real world is because there is some real-world risk and consequence associated with abusing/misusing it. Time/skill training is the only meaningful risk/punishment in EVE. Ergo, make Margin Trading a "T3" skill; failed margin orders knock a level off your Margin Trading skill.
There, problem solved. Legitimate users of Margin Trading should almost never fail an order (unless they are being too aggressive in which case, slap on wrist, lesson learned). They would be practically unaffected.
Scammers can still scam, only now they'll have to dedicate a bit of account training time once in a while to keep it going indefinitely. A bit of consequence to abusing the Margin Trading mechanic and an ongoing investment required on the part of the scammer.
Everybody wins. |

Decian Falx
Arcana Imperii Ltd. Strictly Unprofessional
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 22:45:00 -
[85] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Decian Falx wrote:You return to Dodixie, manually set the sell price to 24m each (minimum required in escrow w/ margin trading 5, at buy price of 100m). You press sell, the escrow alone covers the 24m*5=120m.
If you try this currently, the order fails anyway: It *seems* to check whether the scammer has the full offered amount rather than the amount asked. It does work like that. But you're not the first to think of that trick. Buy order for 10, minimum 5, 100m/unit. Total order is 1b, escrow is 240m. Sell 5 to the order at 48m/unit. Total order is now 500m, escrow is now 0 ISK. Now start spamming your 80m/unit sales contract.
I was not aware of this, however I don't see how that's really a problem: Selling at 48m per unit should only use up the escrow for the units sold: selling at double the escrow value should draw half the funds from escrow and half from wallet. Escrow goes away first but on a per unit basis.
Worded another way, if I have a 5 unit buy order left, my minimum escrow is still 24% of the price of those 5 units. The remainder is due on sale or the order fails. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4242
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 22:50:00 -
[86] - Quote
Decian Falx wrote:I was not aware of this, however I don't see how that's really a problem: Selling at 48m per unit should only use up the escrow for the units sold: selling at double the escrow value should draw half the funds from escrow and half from wallet. Escrow goes away first but on a per unit basis.
Worded another way, if I have a 5 unit buy order left, my minimum escrow is still 24% of the price of those 5 units. The remainder is due on sale or the order fails.
That's not how EVE's Escrow works. Escrow is a pool, not spread over each item, nor each order, simply per character/wallet. And they aren't selling to the order at double the escrow amount, they're selling 5 units at the full escrow amount (240m).
Moreover, changing it to work the way you suggest would do horrible things to the vast majority of traders who use the Margin Trade skill to allow them to compete in larger and slower markets without an unlimited bankroll. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 00:46:00 -
[87] - Quote
The OP is obviously trolling at this point but I'd like to expand on something other people have touched on.
While it's an excellent scam, it relies upon something no other scam utilizes. The perceived integrity of the in-game market.
Let's take a ISK doubling scam. In order to fall for this scam you need to place your trust in some official looking wallet API site which for new players isn't so farfetched. But it's still easy to see the website is not affiliated with CCP. You don't get an in-game window indicating that the character is delivering their promises.
Contract scams. This simply relies on people not actually reading the contract and assume the title or local spam is accurate. The in-game description of the contract is completely accurate 100% of the time, as anyone would expect from a central game system.
But with the margin-trading scam your trust is breached not by a player. Not by an external website. But by the market itself which says that another player will buy an item off of you for the specified price. There is absolutely no reason for a player to consider the game's own market is lying to them.
When someone falls prey to this scam they aren't going to direct rage at the previously anonymous perpetrator. They are going to feel betrayed by the game's own mechanics. I don't really think this is the kind of scam CCP wants.
I've seen two solutions I would consider acceptable. Show the percentage of the buy order in escrow, so it's at least remotely noticeable to a player that the buy order is not a guarantee. Or delist/reduce buy orders when the potential buyer no longer has the funds. Anything else is either overly punitive to those actually trying to use the margin trading skill legitimately, or does not solve the problem of the market system itself being untruthful.
I hope that even those who enjoy the harsh realities of Eve can see this is an unacceptable situation, for reasons that have nothing to do with the actual scam, but with the apparent veracity of the market. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Forsak3n.
614
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 01:30:00 -
[88] - Quote
I think there should be a message somewhere that reminds people that orders don't necessarily complete. If there is, then ignore me. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. |

TheMercenaryKing
StarFleet Enterprises Fatal Ascension
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 13:31:00 -
[89] - Quote
So if i understand this scam it is like the contract and buy order scam where a minimum amount of x item (not sold on the market) is needed and the contract offers x items - 1. The person attempts to sell the items he/she bought on the contract and fails for minimum items requires. In this case its not the minimum items, its the amount of isk the buyer has.
Dude, if an offer looks too good to be true, it is. Why would someone make a contract for an item and then compare it to the market when they would get more isk by selling on the market buy orders? |

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
689
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 13:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
You can't add teaching common sense to the market tutorial.. |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 13:48:00 -
[91] - Quote
TheMercenaryKing wrote:So if i understand this scam it is like the contract and buy order scam where a minimum amount of x item (not sold on the market) is needed and the contract offers x items - 1. The person attempts to sell the items he/she bought on the contract and fails for minimum items requires. In this case its not the minimum items, its the amount of isk the buyer has.
Dude, if an offer looks too good to be true, it is. Why would someone make a contract for an item and then compare it to the market when they would get more isk by selling on the market buy orders? No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4244
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 16:14:00 -
[92] - Quote
James Akachi wrote: No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense.
The ability to put up more buy orders than you can cover with your liquid balance is the entire point of the skill. And since a buy order failing cannot possibly hurt anyone (as they are left in the exact same position they were in before it failed), there's no reason to change this. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 17:31:00 -
[93] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote: No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense.
The ability to put up more buy orders than you can cover with your liquid balance is the entire point of the skill. And since a buy order failing cannot possibly hurt anyone (as they are left in the exact same position they were in before it failed), there's no reason to change this. The skill does not allow you to put up a buy order you cannot currently cover, am I mistaken?
If that is true then my suggested fixes would not affect those legitimately using the skill to put up multiple buy orders, but either it needs to be displayed which buy orders are not a guarantee, or they should simply be delisted when the buyer's funds are reduced.
The idea that the in-game market is displaying orders which cannot be fulfilled reflects poorly only on the game itself. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2695
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 20:34:00 -
[94] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:Having waited a while for constructive replies to occur, and seeing none, I'll begrudgingly respond to the blatently deceptive responses of margin trade scammers trying to keep a broken system broken: Mara Pahrdi wrote:All risks connected to the margin trading skill are just general risks of doing business in EVE. They fit perfectly well with the overall design of the game when it comes to trading. No, you are wrong; completely wrong. EVE is designed as more than a mere run of the mill MMO; it's a simulated universe. Your ignorant response is purposefully ignoring that fact to gloss over the inherent problem of in-game margin trade market fraud not being dealt with as it otherwise would be in a functioning world. It is the very reason I brought up the fraud angle in the first place. Looking at the game in terms of the characters as people acting within a real-world economy, anyone perpetrating the margin trade scams would very quickly find themselves on the losing-end of heavy fines, lawsuits, and/or extensive jail sentences. Under the currently broken system, the only people who lose due to margin trade scams are the victims of said scams; there are no real or meaningful consequences for the perpetrators of those scams, and that is the point of my suggestions. Without the protection systems that should be in place, margin trade scammers are left scott-free to bloat the market with fraudulent orders that have an exactly 0% chance of being fulfilled due to the abuse of the system's current mechanics. That is not a correctly functioning or sensible system; it's flat-out broken.
First off, the only fraudulent element of the "margin trade scam" is the buy order. When the buy order fails, you keep the goods, and they lose the broker fees for setting up the order. Sorry if you think the ~1% broker fee loss isn't enough. You keep your goods in this scenario, so how is it unfair and broken to you?
Additionally, this is an MMO environment where you can AWOX, Steal, scam, and suicide gank players anywhere... with little to no NPC repercussions. Why would anyone care if some put up a false buy order?
Now, I do agree that margin trader scammers should be vulnerable to counter attacks. As such, I proposed Industrial, Market, and Financial Analysis agents to follow the money trail and identify the characters worthy of your retribution. Once you know who they are, there are plenty of in-game tools to go after them. |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2696
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 21:06:00 -
[95] - Quote
Careby wrote:The margin trading skill is fine. In-game fraud is fine. Capitalizing on the greed of other players is fine.
What is not fine is flawed market information. Market information should be 100% reliable at the time it is displayed. If an order cannot possible execute, it should not be visible in the market screens.
Sell orders are 100% reliable....
Why do buy orders need to be guaranteed?
|

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2696
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 21:11:00 -
[96] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote: No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense.
The ability to put up more buy orders than you can cover with your liquid balance is the entire point of the skill. And since a buy order failing cannot possibly hurt anyone (as they are left in the exact same position they were in before it failed), there's no reason to change this. The skill does not allow you to put up a buy order you cannot currently cover, am I mistaken? If that is true then my suggested fixes would not affect those legitimately using the skill to put up multiple buy orders, but either it needs to be displayed which buy orders are not a guarantee, or they should simply be delisted when the buyer's funds are reduced. The idea that the in-game market is displaying orders which cannot be fulfilled reflects poorly only on the game itself.
You are mistaken: The margin trade skill allows you to put up an order you do not have the funds to fully cover. At MT5, you need 24% of the necessary isk to create an order.
FYI: There is no such thing as a GUARANTEED buy order. They don't exist in this game. Only sell orders are guaranteed, so run your business using that knowledge and you'll be fine! |

Criseyde
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 21:55:00 -
[97] - Quote
I think there's two things interacting here:
The ability to specify a minimum number of items on a buy order.
The ability to create buy orders that will never ever complete, ever.
The easiest solution is to ensure that money for the minimum buy order unit is always present in escrow. If there is insufficient escrow, the order gets cancelled.
E.g.
Buy 50 tritanium @ 4.00 isk per unit, with min accepted quantity of 1 unit: money in escrow due to margin trading = (50 * 4.00) * 0.24 = 48.00 isk
minimum unit price = 1 * 4.00 = 4.00 isk
48.00 > 4.00, so 48.00 isk is the accepted escrow
Buy 4 tritanium @ 4.00 isk per unit, with min accepted quantity of 1 unit: money in escrow due to margin trading = (4 * 4.00) * 0.24 = 3.84 isk
minimum unit price = 1 * 4.00 = 4.00 isk
3.84 < 4.00, so 4.00 isk is the accepted escrow
Buy 50 tritanium @ 4.00 isk per unit, with min accepted quantity of 10 units: money in escrow due to margin trading = (50 * 4.00) * 0.24 = 48.00 isk
minimum unit price = 10 * 4.00 = 40.00 isk
40.00 < 48.00, so 48.00 isk is the accepted escrow
Buy 50 tritanium @ 4.00 isk per unit, with min accepted quantity of 25 units: money in escrow due to margin trading = (50 * 4.00) * 0.24 = 48.00 isk
minimum unit price = 25 * 4.00 = 100.00 isk
100.00 > 48.00, so 100.00 isk is the accepted escrow
(One possible implementation: Money is used from escrow to make purchases, up to the point where using more money from escrow would not cover the minimum buy order unit. At this point, further units are purchased with money from the wallet. If there is not enough money left in the wallet, the remaining escrow is used to buy one last item, and the order cancelled.)
With this change, margin trading will work fine for legitimate purposes (e.g. station trading). It's also still possible to create scams (either specify a high minimum item count for a super rare item, or contract someone 10 items and only have money in escrow to buy back two of them). However, now the scammer must undergo some risk as well (someone sourcing a rare item elsewhere, or selling them two of the rare item).
N.B. Obviously this would require CCP to decide that they want to remove / nerf this exploit. My own opinion is that it needs to go, but I'm not getting into a discussion on it. This is just to present a viable solution. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4248
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 22:01:00 -
[98] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: You are mistaken: The margin trade skill allows you to put up an order you do not have the funds to fully cover. At MT5, you need 24% of the necessary isk to create an order.
FYI: There is no such thing as a GUARANTEED buy order. They don't exist in this game. Only sell orders are guaranteed, so run your business using that knowledge and you'll be fine!
There are no guaranteed sell orders either. They can be taken down or completed by someone else at any time.
I've gotten the "there's no such order" error when buying stuff plenty of times. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 22:28:00 -
[99] - Quote
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:James Akachi wrote:RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote: No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense.
The ability to put up more buy orders than you can cover with your liquid balance is the entire point of the skill. And since a buy order failing cannot possibly hurt anyone (as they are left in the exact same position they were in before it failed), there's no reason to change this. The skill does not allow you to put up a buy order you cannot currently cover, am I mistaken? If that is true then my suggested fixes would not affect those legitimately using the skill to put up multiple buy orders, but either it needs to be displayed which buy orders are not a guarantee, or they should simply be delisted when the buyer's funds are reduced. The idea that the in-game market is displaying orders which cannot be fulfilled reflects poorly only on the game itself. You are mistaken: The margin trade skill allows you to put up an order you do not have the funds to fully cover. At MT5, you need 24% of the necessary isk to create an order. FYI: There is no such thing as a GUARANTEED buy order. They don't exist in this game. Only sell orders are guaranteed, so run your business using that knowledge and you'll be fine! It would be nice if this was indicated anywhere in the market or tutorials, then. With this in mind I will be sure never to try to make ISK off the market directly. |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 22:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote: You are mistaken: The margin trade skill allows you to put up an order you do not have the funds to fully cover. At MT5, you need 24% of the necessary isk to create an order.
FYI: There is no such thing as a GUARANTEED buy order. They don't exist in this game. Only sell orders are guaranteed, so run your business using that knowledge and you'll be fine!
There are no guaranteed sell orders either. They can be taken down or completed by someone else at any time. I've gotten the "there's no such order" error when buying stuff plenty of times. If they are taken down or completed then they go away. They don't stay up for the next several days, indicating a promise that cannot be fulfilled. Since this can apparently be done without having the money to begin with, I retract my suggestions, but this is a disconcerting system to say the least. |

Ignitious Hellfury
Minmatar Republic Military Skool
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 23:04:00 -
[101] - Quote
What you don't understand is that scamming is a GOOD THING for eve. I'm still sad they got rid of free from contracts. Any means of taking is from the stupid and delivering it to the clever is good.
Plus, this only works in suspicious scenarios: What, this guy has a buy order for vaga for 1,000,000,000 and there is a vaga for sale in station for only 300m? LOL I'll get this free isk! ... cmon now kids, lets just use our brains instead. |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 23:06:00 -
[102] - Quote
Ignitious Hellfury wrote:What you don't understand is that scamming is a GOOD THING for eve. I'm still sad they got rid of free from contracts. Any means of taking is from the stupid and delivering it to the clever is good.
Plus, this only works in suspicious scenarios: What, this guy has a buy order for vaga for 1,000,000,000 and there is a vaga for sale in station for only 300m? LOL I'll get this free isk! ... cmon now kids, lets just use our brains instead. I agree completely. My comments are only related to the mechanisms of the market buy orders. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4249
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 23:15:00 -
[103] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:If they are taken down or completed then they go away. They don't stay up for the next several days, indicating a promise that cannot be fulfilled. Since this can apparently be done without having the money to begin with, I retract my suggestions, but this is a disconcerting system to say the least.
I was talking about the times they disappear between the time you click on them and the time you finish the sales window and click ok.
You just have to remember that no harm can possibly come from being left in the exact same position you were in before you tried selling to the buy order, and the buyer has lost their broker fee without a successful transaction to show for it. So why would the system be designed to needlessly charge buyers broker fees?
If there's an order that they can't afford right now, but nobody's trying to sell to them, what's the problem? When someone does try to sell to the order, the broker checks the escrow account and wallet, and if there are not sufficient funds, the exchange doesn't take place and the prospective seller is left entirely unharmed.
It's like going to a store, putting your items in the cart, and finding that you don't have the money to pay when you get to the register. Nobody gets in trouble because no contractual relationship has been in trouble and no transaction has taken place. You simply leave with what you had when you walked in, and the store retains the goods you were interested in. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2700
|
Posted - 2013.10.09 23:58:00 -
[104] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:Gizznitt Malikite wrote:James Akachi wrote:RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote: No, it is placing a buy order that looks inviting by controlling the sell orders available, then lowering your wallet balance so when someone attempts to sell you the item, you cannot cover the purchase. With Margin Trading the "buyer" only needs to put a percentage of the buy order in escrow. The only problem I have is that it is then possible for the market to show buy orders that will fail, this makes no sense.
The ability to put up more buy orders than you can cover with your liquid balance is the entire point of the skill. And since a buy order failing cannot possibly hurt anyone (as they are left in the exact same position they were in before it failed), there's no reason to change this. The skill does not allow you to put up a buy order you cannot currently cover, am I mistaken? If that is true then my suggested fixes would not affect those legitimately using the skill to put up multiple buy orders, but either it needs to be displayed which buy orders are not a guarantee, or they should simply be delisted when the buyer's funds are reduced. The idea that the in-game market is displaying orders which cannot be fulfilled reflects poorly only on the game itself. You are mistaken: The margin trade skill allows you to put up an order you do not have the funds to fully cover. At MT5, you need 24% of the necessary isk to create an order. FYI: There is no such thing as a GUARANTEED buy order. They don't exist in this game. Only sell orders are guaranteed, so run your business using that knowledge and you'll be fine! It would be nice if this was indicated anywhere in the market or tutorials, then. With this in mind I will be sure never to try to make ISK off the market directly.
Fine by me.... that just leaves more opportunities for me to enjoy! |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 00:00:00 -
[105] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote:If they are taken down or completed then they go away. They don't stay up for the next several days, indicating a promise that cannot be fulfilled. Since this can apparently be done without having the money to begin with, I retract my suggestions, but this is a disconcerting system to say the least. I was talking about the times they disappear between the time you click on them and the time you finish the sales window and click ok. You just have to remember that no harm can possibly come from being left in the exact same position you were in before you tried selling to the buy order, and the buyer has lost their broker fee without a successful transaction to show for it. So why would the system be designed to needlessly charge buyers broker fees? If there's an order that they can't afford right now, but nobody's trying to sell to them, what's the problem? When someone does try to sell to the order, the broker checks the escrow account and wallet, and if there are not sufficient funds, the exchange doesn't take place and the prospective seller is left entirely unharmed. It's like going to a store, putting your items in the cart, and finding that you don't have the money to pay when you get to the register. Nobody gets in trouble because no contractual relationship has been in trouble and no transaction has taken place. You simply leave with what you had when you walked in, and the store retains the goods you were interested in. That is a flawed analogy. This is not a store transaction, it is an order which in some cases could never have been funded. A sell order cannot be put up and maintained without having the physical goods that are being sold. Nor can a contract of any sort function in this manner. I do not understand why anyone would expect a market system to list false buy orders.
You keep repeating that it doesn't harm anyone. Well aside from the scam that has been discussed earlier in this topic that is true. I am not claiming it is bad because people make money in an illicit manner from it. I'm saying it is contrary to the function of an official ingame market system. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4250
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 00:12:00 -
[106] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:That is a flawed analogy. This is not a store transaction, it is an order which in some cases could never have been funded. So is putting the goods in your cart when you don't have the money in your bank account (assuming you plan to pay with a debit card). You say "I want to buy this" the broker (cashier) calls your bank (or the computer does it) and the bank says "there isn't enough money in the account, don't complete the transaction." Where is the flaw in the analogy?
There's a reason why most businesses do not take special orders (or usually any order that cannot be filled immediately) without a deposit. They adapted to the fact that (barring a specific contract), an order is not binding until the goods have changed hands. Deposits allow them to recover any expenses they may have incurred by making the goods available to the customer.
Quote:A sell order cannot be put up and maintained without having the physical goods that are being sold. Nor can a contract of any sort function in this manner. I do not understand why anyone would expect a market system to list false buy orders.
Why should the broker check the escrow account unless someone's asking him to?
They aren't false buy orders. The skill allows you to tell the broker "I'll have the rest of the money available by the time someone asks to fill the order." Since you're the only one who can possibly be harmed by your own failure to do so, what's the problem? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 01:04:00 -
[107] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote:That is a flawed analogy. This is not a store transaction, it is an order which in some cases could never have been funded. So is putting the goods in your cart when you don't have the money in your bank account (assuming you plan to pay with a debit card). You say "I want to buy this" the broker (cashier) calls your bank (or the computer does it) and the bank says "there isn't enough money in the account, don't complete the transaction." Where is the flaw in the analogy?
In that the store didn't put up a notice saying you had the money to purchase those items when you entered the store. It's not at all comparable.
Quote:Quote:A sell order cannot be put up and maintained without having the physical goods that are being sold. Nor can a contract of any sort function in this manner. I do not understand why anyone would expect a market system to list false buy orders. Why should the broker check the escrow account unless someone's asking him to? They aren't false buy orders. The skill allows you to tell the broker "I'll have the rest of the money available by the time someone asks to fill the order." Since you're the only one who can possibly be harmed by your own failure to do so, what's the problem? It's not about who it harms. It's about buy orders being on the market that cannot be fulfilled, the system knows this because it knows your wallet balance. This is completely antithetical to any market system I know of. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4252
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 01:25:00 -
[108] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:In that the store didn't put up a notice saying you had the money to purchase those items when you entered the store. It's not at all comparable.
Find where in the market screen it guarantees that all buy orders are always fully supported. Just because you make an assumption doesn't make it a fact.
Quote:It's not about who it harms. It's about buy orders being on the market that cannot be fulfilled, the system knows this because it knows your wallet balance. This is completely antithetical to any market system I know of.
I just mentioned one. Ordering something from a store that doesn't require a deposit. Some of those orders may never be picked up because the person who ordered the item realized they didn't have the money. No goods change hands, no money changes hands, no problem.
Also, the market server doesn't do a database call of every wallet in the game every server tick. That would be insane. So it doesn't actually know every wallet balance in the sense you think it does. It checks the balance of a wallet when it makes sense to check it, that is to say when it needs to know the balance either because someone's checking the balance or trying to make a transaction. It's like an ATM; the machine doesn't know everyone's balance, but it can (and will) check if asked.
If you agree that the system as it is now cannot hurt anyone, why should it be changed? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Ethrei
The Pulsar Innovation Surely You're Joking
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 01:40:00 -
[109] - Quote
I skipped 6 pages, I''ll assume (and safely so) that I didn't miss anything.
Anyhow, I came all this way just to say, OP, you seem butthurt. Were you the victim of your own ignorance and foolish, impulsive greed? It sure does sound like it. Maybe you should work on that instead of the 'broken system' that only actually punishes people too stupid to pay attention. Common sense and paying attention to what is going on is more than enough to avoid getting scammed; 6 years running and SOMEHOW I've avoided getting scammed by this horribly broken and scam-filled system. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... After all, a fool and their money are soon parted. |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 01:47:00 -
[110] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote:In that the store didn't put up a notice saying you had the money to purchase those items when you entered the store. It's not at all comparable. Find where in the market screen it guarantees that all buy orders are always fully supported. Just because you make an assumption doesn't make it a fact. Where in the market screen does it say buy orders can be false? I've been playing for 6 months and never even knew this was a possibility until a week ago through a third party website. Who would assume that an in-game market shows you orders that will fail? That's ludicrous.
Quote:Quote:It's not about who it harms. It's about buy orders being on the market that cannot be fulfilled, the system knows this because it knows your wallet balance. This is completely antithetical to any market system I know of. I just mentioned one. Ordering something from a store that doesn't require a deposit. Some of those orders may never be picked up because the person who ordered the item realized they didn't have the money. No goods change hands, no money changes hands, no problem. Also, the market server doesn't do a database call of every wallet in the game every server tick. That would be insane. So it doesn't actually know every wallet balance in the sense you think it does. It checks the balance of a wallet when it makes sense to check it, that is to say when it needs to know the balance either because someone's checking the balance or trying to make a transaction. It's like an ATM; the machine doesn't know everyone's balance, but it can (and will) check if asked. I didn't mean to say it should; I was referring to the game knowing you don't have the funds when you place the order initially. Checking balance periodically to remove unfunded orders is one of the possible solutions I presented earlier before knowing orders could be placed without having the funds to begin with.
Quote:If you agree that the system as it is now cannot hurt anyone, why should it be changed? It can, but only those who don't do their research. I agree that scam is a non-issue. It should be changed because it's misleading to list orders that will not go through, especially if they would not have even gone through when they were placed.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4252
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 06:51:00 -
[111] - Quote
James Akachi wrote: Where in the market screen does it say buy orders can be false? I've been playing for 6 months and never even knew this was a possibility until a week ago through a third party website. Who would assume that an in-game market shows you orders that will fail? That's ludicrous.
I never claimed that it said that. I am only claiming that nowhere on the market screen does it guarantee that all orders will complete. If you assume otherwise (as you are doing in trying to shift the burden onto me), that's on you.
Quote:I didn't mean to say it should; I was referring to the game knowing you don't have the funds when you place the order initially. Checking balance periodically to remove unfunded orders is one of the possible solutions I presented earlier before knowing orders could be placed without having the funds to begin with.
So you're saying that newer marketeers (y'know, the ones for whom the skill is most important) should have to work out in advance what order (generally largest to smallest) to place their orders in so that they can place all the orders they want before running into an arbitrary liquidity requirement?
Why should the balances be checked until someone tries to fill the order? Why should new marketeers be arbitrarily punished for momentary liquidity crises (you know, the type that new, inexperienced, relatively poor market traders are likely to have)?
Quote:It can, but only those who don't do their research. I agree that scam is a non-issue. It should be changed because it's misleading to list orders that will not go through, especially if they would not have even gone through when they were placed.
They are left with exactly what they had before they tried to sell to the order, so how are they harmed by the order failing? Are you claiming that there should be some sort of guarantee that there will be a customer ready to buy an overpriced item you bought just because you bought it at a ridiculous price?
Check out the Fiddle Game scam for the RL equivalent of the Margin scam. The scam is over when you buy the fiddle. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 13:37:00 -
[112] - Quote
Do people really come into this game and not assume that orders displayed by the game's own market system for months would have had a possibility of being fulfilled at some point in their lifetime? I find that hard to believe.
Should I need to conduct a thorough investigation of skills to make sure other critical game systems such as contracts or manufacturing job requirements aren't lying to me? |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2701
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 17:39:00 -
[113] - Quote
Have you ever ordered drive through only to discover you don't have your wallet? Ever have a prescription filled only to leave it behind because you don't have your insurance card? Have you ever As long as you don't take possession of the food (aka like eat the food before realizing you can't pay for it), there are very few recourses a business can take against you.
Many businesses deal with "false buy orders" on a regular basis. The majority of times it is accidental, and they eat the cost of prepping the food and hope to sell it to someone else. Sometimes it is malicious (did you ever have unpaid pizza delivered to someone as a prank?), and in these cases the Business owners take steps to avoid future losses.
In EvE, which is purposely dystopic, you too can suffer from "false buy orders". You can also implement good business practices to avoid future losses (like researching the true value of your goods, as well as their sales volume and volatility). And unlike the above scenarios, when the buy order fails, you keep the goods, which are NOT perishable, meaning it is even easier to avoid losses like the above.
In short.... do some research when engaging in trade-for-money, and quit trying to change the market system because your to lazy or incompetent to cope with this simple concept.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4254
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:19:00 -
[114] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:Do people really come into this game and not assume that orders displayed by the game's own market system for months would have had a possibility of being fulfilled at some point in their lifetime? I find that hard to believe.
So you're saying that you did make an assumption, it turned out to be wrong, and now you're angry. Every game is different, and it behooves you to investigate investments before making them. When I first saw one of these, I asked someone what the hell was up, and had it explained to me. It's pretty damn obvious that there's something fishy about a buy order for hundreds of millions of ISK more than the lowest sell order. It doesn't take all that much clear thinking to just not buy the fiddle.
Quote:Should I need to conduct a thorough investigation of skills to make sure other critical game systems such as contracts or manufacturing job requirements aren't lying to me?
If you don't have Production Efficiency 5, the Material requirements a blueprint will show you will be wrong if the blueprint has extra materials that also appear in the normal materials. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:34:00 -
[115] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:James Akachi wrote:Do people really come into this game and not assume that orders displayed by the game's own market system for months would have had a possibility of being fulfilled at some point in their lifetime? I find that hard to believe. So you're saying that you did make an assumption, it turned out to be wrong, and now you're angry. Every game is different, and it behooves you to investigate investments before making them. When I first saw one of these, I asked someone what the hell was up, and had it explained to me. It's pretty damn obvious that there's something fishy about a buy order for hundreds of millions of ISK more than the lowest sell order. It doesn't take all that much clear thinking to just not buy the fiddle. Actually I have never seen this scam or had a buy order fail, I've repeatedly mentioned I have no problem with the scam's existence. That is irrelevant to my point, which is solely that the market should not display incorrect information.
Quote:Quote:Should I need to conduct a thorough investigation of skills to make sure other critical game systems such as contracts or manufacturing job requirements aren't lying to me? If you don't have Production Efficiency 5, the Material requirements a blueprint will show you will be wrong if the blueprint has extra materials that also appear in the normal materials. I am aware. Unlike the market issue, that is a bug. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4256
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:32:00 -
[116] - Quote
James Akachi wrote:Actually I have never seen this scam or had a buy order fail, I've repeatedly mentioned I have no problem with the scam's existence. That is irrelevant to my point, which is solely that the market should not display incorrect information.
What's incorrect about it? Someone has placed an order for those items and has promised to have the ISK by the time someone tries to sell to them. They've paid their fee to the broker, so why shouldn't the order remain until it completes, expires, or fails?
Quote:I am aware. Unlike the market issue, that is a bug.
I thought after 9 months it became a feature...  "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Mnemonym
Salvage Security Services MK.VII
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 07:29:00 -
[117] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: What's incorrect about it? Someone has placed an order for those items and has promised to have the ISK by the time someone tries to sell to them. They've paid their fee to the broker, so why shouldn't the order remain until it completes, expires, or fails?
The order should cease to exist BEFORE it gets the point of failure, if the wallet cant cover the order it has no validity.
Orders should not fail, this is the issue.
I'm sitting at the station, I have the goods, the order is still present, I go to sell the product, and lo and behold the system fails the trade..... had it been the case that the person putting up the buy order cancelled it, I would say working as intended. but the system failing the trade for no penalty is wrong |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
1336
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:40:00 -
[118] - Quote
Ignitious Hellfury wrote:What you don't understand is that scamming is a GOOD THING for eve. I'm still sad they got rid of free from contracts. Any means of taking is from the stupid and delivering it to the clever is good.
Plus, this only works in suspicious scenarios: What, this guy has a buy order for vaga for 1,000,000,000 and there is a vaga for sale in station for only 300m? LOL I'll get this free isk! ... cmon now kids, lets just use our brains instead. While I agree, margin trading scams exploit the fact that EVE has a different market system to any other game. Coming from any other MMO you would never think that an order on the market had any ability to fail, so until you've read about it or fallen for it, you don't know about it. Scammers should have to put in effort to scam, and I think MT scams require no effort thanks to that fundamental misunderstanding. Here I'll quote myself from prevously:
Lucas Kell wrote:The only change I'd make to margin trade is adding a column to state the amount in escrow for the order (probably as a %). It's not unrealistic to have that information, and it would not stop stupid people falling for trade scams.
See the problem with margin trading is that coming from other games, you won't know about it until after you've been scammed (or if you've read up on it specifically). It's not a common thing in games and it's never explained, so you are assumed to know that an order can fail. By adding a column to show the amount in escrow people would see it and say "I wonder what that means" then go find out. That doesn't mean an order with less than the full amount in escrow is a scam, it would just give you the information you need to make informed decisions.
tl;dr MT scams prey on lack of knowledge about game mechanics. Providing information that points to those mechanics allows a player to educate himself before falling prey to one, if he so wishes.
On top of that, for some reason the spam of "look at this EPIC FAIL market order! LOL!" annoys me more than any other spam. Now spam, there's an issue that need resolving. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Sylphy
TSOE Po1ice TSOE Consortium
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:27:00 -
[119] - Quote
Actually, the solution si pretty simple. And it would eliminate a lof of the scams.
When placing a buy order, the portion that you're willing to pay for the item(s) in question is taken out of your wallet and put in a reserved state until the sale goes through and currency is given to the seller or you cancel the buy order and money returns to you.
The fact that you can put a 2bil buy order without actually having 2 bil in your wallet is a scam on it's own.. |

Yolo
Yolo Corp xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
66
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:56:00 -
[120] - Quote
When a trade fails because you have no funds, the margin is transfered to the person trying to sell to you instead of returned to your wallet.
This means, you can still trade using margin trading exaly like today, but there is an added risk. When someone puts up a fake/scam buyorder, it would be of economical interest for someone to find these rare items and meet the order to cash out the margin.
If someone is scammed, and they will be, they get the margin so in the end their economical blow is reduced by 24% and their chance of staying in the game increases exponentionally.
What ya think? - since 2003, bitches |

Drakast
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:08:00 -
[121] - Quote
William Bradley wrote:I'm not aware if these ideas have been posted or not, so with that said here goes:
As many players are aware,t.
CCP wont change anything because they gather all the lost tax from the cancelled orders.
its an isk sink easily avoided by looking at the market before you go clicking your mouse button.
only the stupid and greedy get caught out.
|

Angeal MacNova
XDraconis CombineX
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 16:16:00 -
[122] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3746822#post3746822 |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4273
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 01:35:00 -
[123] - Quote
Yolo wrote:When a trade fails because you have no funds, the margin is transfered to the person trying to sell to you instead of returned to your wallet.
You can already do that. You just sell your item at ~25% of the listed price (the minimum escrow amount with MT5).
Of course, if they already did that...
Mnemonym wrote:The order should cease to exist BEFORE it gets the point of failure, if the wallet cant cover the order it has no validity.
Why? The only person hurt by a failed order is the one who posted the order. They lose their broker fees, and don't get a successful transaction.
Besides, the entire point of the skill is to allow you to have more buy orders than you can afford right now.
Quote:Orders should not fail, this is the issue.
Why not? Why should the order complete if the buyer doesn't have the money to pay for the goods? "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc Forsak3n.
635
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:09:00 -
[124] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Yolo wrote:Orders should not fail, this is the issue. Why not? Why should the order complete if the buyer doesn't have the money to pay for the goods? They want the margin trading scam to actually work. Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
4274
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 08:11:00 -
[125] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yolo wrote:Orders should not fail, this is the issue. Why not? Why should the order complete if the buyer doesn't have the money to pay for the goods? They want the margin trading scam to actually work.
If the order completes, it changes from a scam to an infinite, free ISK fountain. "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
d-£-󦦦º-ó-ꦪ¦¦e¦¦-í-ë-í-󦦦+¦¦¦»-ö¦+b-¥¦º¦¦¦¦¦½¦¦-ö-ëa-Ŧ+-¥¦í¦+-à-à¦ñc¦ó-á¦í-ƒ¦«¦½¦Ö¦¦¦á-ò-çl-Ǧ¢-ü¦+-û¦ƒ¦¦-ô-ë-Ö-ô¦Ñ-ô¦¬¦½e¦+¦¿¦ù¦¦¦ÿ¦ù¦Ñ¦¼-ò-ꦽ¦¦¦+¦+-ö¦¦-à¦á¦ú¦ÿ |

James Akachi
Perkone Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:00:00 -
[126] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Yolo wrote:Orders should not fail, this is the issue. Why not? Why should the order complete if the buyer doesn't have the money to pay for the goods? They want the margin trading scam to actually work. I don't think anyone has stated that, that's obviously a bad idea. Personally I want the market only to show valid orders, like a market or auction service in any other game. There is no precedent for an in-game market system that shows orders that cannot be completed. In addition there is no in-game mention of this aspect to new players, even in the tutorial that encourages them to use the market to purchase a tracking computer. I would similarly want such an indication if Contracts could fail after fulfilling all of the requirements, as that is also nonsensical. |

Astarte Bellatrix
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 17:25:00 -
[127] - Quote
(I posted this in a new topic, but seems to fit here) - The mechanics for margin trading that allow for the scam make no sense. Which is why so many fall for it once. Once a player corners the market on some rare item, it is too easy and risk free to lure a noob in while emptying the escrow. It allows these scammers to just sit there, bot some messages about a great deal, and trap someone who would never have guessed that it was possible to place a buy order that had no funds to back it up and which would cancel as soon as they tries to redeem it. That kind of mechanical flaw strikes me as crazy, and the use of it seems more like an unfair exploit than a legitimate tactic. I also have some trouble seeing how margin trading carries any risk at all, either done legitimately or as a scam. All that a player who puts up a buy order without enough funds in escrow or wallet risks are the fees and taxes. Everything else in Eve carries risk, but why not margin sales, especially when run as a scam?
I would suggest the following: it should not be possible to reduce the escrow below what is required for the skill level to place the buy order. The player placing the buy order should at least be required to always have that escrow in place. The scam will still be possible but will be a little trickier. And to make a real risk, if a margin buyer has a buy order out and fails to have the funds needed for the order in escrow and in their wallet, the escrow should be forfeited to the person who tried to make the sale, or forfeited to eve as a fine. Margin buyers can still try to work a version of the scam, but will have to keep track of it and will face real risk if someone out-thinks them. It would certainly be more interesting if there was a way to hunt margin scammers and try to beat them at their own game, since they never leave station and mostly operate as bots.
The scam also will not work as well if there are sufficient items out there. I have tried to trap a margin scammer, but he has control of every one of the items he uses. Not sure how this would work, but perhaps Eve could inject a number of items into the market whenever the number available falls below a certain amount. The only way I can think of now to trap a margin scammer is to wait for someone to fall for it, then try to buy the items the victim tries to resell before the scammer buy thems back cheap for further use, but catching the event at that exact moment is pretty impossible, especially if there are no other items out there that can be planted in the scam mechanics to alert me when a victim has fallen for it. Just a few items would be sufficient, not something that would alter the legitimate market, but if only enough were floating around to defeat the scam, that would put a lot of risk on the scammer b/c someone on to the game who can get access to those items on the market can potentially trap the scammer (if the escrow remained) or at least short-circuit the scam. A scam hunter could find the items and boom!
Markets work in part because of some knowledge of the players involved. It should be possible to find out who is making buy and sell orders, instead of having to wait until the transaction occurs. Why not have the player's ID in the market window or at least available if searched for in the transaction box? This might create a process for players to alert others about scammers, since the scam itself is usually "run" by a different character than the one who is advertising it. And if I can see that the same character has put up a bunch of sale orders and also has put up cheap buy orders below the scam buy order, that will be a good hint that something odd is going on. In a real market, people know who they are dealing with at some level. Just as in a real market, alts (front companies) could be used, but that is an additional piece of effort for the scammer.
In the end, the ability to place a false (and risk-free) buy order is not something a noob would suspect was possible, and that ability makes no logical sense anyway. I can see how a scammer could pull this off without that mechanism, buy placing the sale and buy orders as needed, then rushing to cancel the buy order as soon as someone falls for the bait by buying the items for sale. But at least that will require some constant maintenance by the scammer, and some resulting strategy and counter-strategy by the parties - a player trying to defeat the scam would know that they need to buy the items or provide their own items from the market and get to the buy order before the scammer can cancel it. If there has to be at least the necessary amount in the escrow, the player trying to beat the scam will have to calculate if they will still make a profit if they do this, or at least seriously damage the scammer's isk, which would carry its own satisfaction.
Eve has security ratings and standings. But running scams does not affect that. There should be a mechanism to score honest players on the market and scammers. Sort of a Better Business Bureau for Eve. Bounties don't work b/c the margin scammers rarely leave station and use alts.
Another problem with margin scams is the use of what amounts to bots, placing messages in trade hub local chats every two minutes. And the ease of the margin scam promotes this, b/c the scammer just plants the landmine in the market and then bots the messages on locals until, inevitably, someone bites. Make the scammer stay at the computer because there is a way to defeat the scam if they are not monitoring the market, but keeping the amount in the escrow and not allowing the order to just fail without any risk to the scammer. |

Psychoactive Stimulant
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 17:35:00 -
[128] - Quote
Margin scams are good for the game. This game has plenty of hand-holding, we don't need more.
Margin scams keep the user base adult and mature, rather than a bunch of 12 year old whiny bitches. Just like AFK cloaking. These features are what keep the game good. If you appease the ex-WoW players too much, we'll lose what we have.
If you want WoW, go play WoW. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 :: [one page] |