| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
170
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 10:31:00 -
[1] - Quote
I realise CCP are pushing up prices in the hope people will plug the gap with PLEX because they are money grabbers, but for casual players not willing to buy plex are certain types of day to day PVP now too expensive?
I think it's reached the point where battleships are virtually extinct from pvp, especially amongst players who play with risk.
Looking at eve-kill, when you scan the first 5-10 pages of kills on any given day it is extremely rare to see a Battleship being lost, or even used. It's just page after page of frigates, destroyers and cruisers. Is this is a change in play styles, or is it a reflection of costs?
I just lost a hype, which is what made me consider this. It cost 290mil to buy and fit (t2), i then paid 60mil for insurance, went looking for a fight and lost it. I received a 170mil payout. So my 290mil ship returned 110mil in total. Whats up with that?
Surely the average casual gamer can't sustain losing 250-300mil everytime a battleship dies, or 200mil if insured? Especially if you actively go looking for fights in small or solo situations.
When all three battleship tiers were balanced, why wasn't the price set to the MIDDLE tier ship? What was the reaosn behind making them all cot the same as the most expensive tier?
It'd be good to hear some thoughts on this, because that's just one example of a growing trend in EVE. Is the new, younger, in-school and armed with dads credit card target market worth it? I'm not so sure. |

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
213
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 11:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:I realise CCP are pushing up prices in the hope people will plug the gap with PLEX because they are money grabbers, but for casual players not willing to buy plex are certain types of day to day PVP now too expensive?
I think it's reached the point where battleships are virtually extinct from pvp, especially amongst players who play with risk.
Looking at eve-kill, when you scan the first 5-10 pages of kills on any given day it is extremely rare to see a Battleship being lost, or even used. It's just page after page of frigates, destroyers and cruisers. Is this is a change in play styles, or is it a reflection of costs?
I just lost a hype, which is what made me consider this. It cost 290mil to buy and fit (t2), i then paid 60mil for insurance, went looking for a fight and lost it. I received a 170mil payout. So my 290mil ship returned 110mil in total. Whats up with that?
Surely the average casual gamer can't sustain losing 250-300mil everytime a battleship dies, or 200mil if insured? Especially if you actively go looking for fights in small or solo situations.
When all three battleship tiers were balanced, why wasn't the price set to the MIDDLE tier ship? What was the reaosn behind making them all cot the same as the most expensive tier?
It'd be good to hear some thoughts on this, because that's just one example of a growing trend in EVE. Is the new, younger, in-school and armed with dads credit card target market worth it? I'm not so sure.
Of course you're going to see more people lose smaller and cheaper ships. No one thinks twice about going on a suicide roam with a cheap ship but not many want to in a more expensive ship.
Battleships aren't extinct from PVP although new ships such as attack battlecruisers have given players more choices.
Some pilots fly ships costing over a billion ISK in PVP but they're not foolish with them either. Many players can't just lose 200 mil ISK ships on a frequent basis. This is nothing new in Eve. Just don't buy the most expensive ship you can fly.
If you want to fly larger ships in Eve your best bet is to join a nullsec alliance that offers ship reimbursement.
Ships were balanced in the sense that they were given different purposes. I don't think the mineral costs were changed.
TLDR
No PVP isn't becoming too expensive. I've played since 2009 and it seems about the same today as it was then. The cost of failue in Eve is one thing that sets it apart from some other MMO's
|

Danny John-Peter
Stay Frosty.
298
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 11:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Don't constantly PVP in battleships.
I can and have PVPed in everything from TIIIs/Battleships and Various TII hulls, however I still enjoy flying T1/Faction and TII Frigates, PVP doesn't have to be expensive. |

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
5
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 12:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
IIshira wrote:[quote=Nova Satar]
Ships were balanced in the sense that they were given different purposes. I don't think the mineral costs were changed.
You obviously don't have anything to do with construction of ships or industry. Aside from the majority of the 'rebalancing' which I would argue has been largely unnecessary & destructive to other elements of EVE Online the mineral costs for all ships that have been 'rebalanced' has increased exponentially. 'Extra materials', which are not reduced by ME research, have been added to the BPO's for all ships that have been 'rebalanced'. These 'extra materials' are typically adding approximately 40% to the cost of building those ships. If this happened in real life, and in some instances it does, it has a horrendous effect on economies both in New Eden and in RL. For those who got in before the changes to these ships there were significant profits to be made but after the fact construction of affected ships is ruined for months or longer. It does seem that CCP has, and is, making other changes to bring about and/or exacerbate the current fall in mineral prices to fix this situation. But this just brings about more problems for other careers and parts of the New Eden economy. At the moment the best we can hope is that once the T2 ships have all been 'rebalanced' that this plague stops at that threshold. I for one would not like to see capital ship & freighter BPO's touched with this infection. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11747
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 12:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ravens cost 135M or so when I started playing.
To put that into context, so did a 30 GTC card.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
170
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 12:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:IIshira wrote:[quote=Nova Satar]
Ships were balanced in the sense that they were given different purposes. I don't think the mineral costs were changed.
You obviously don't have anything to do with construction of ships or industry. Aside from the majority of the 'rebalancing' which I would argue has been largely unnecessary & destructive to other elements of EVE Online the mineral costs for all ships that have been 'rebalanced' has increased exponentially. 'Extra materials', which are not reduced by ME research, have been added to the BPO's for all ships that have been 'rebalanced'. These 'extra materials' are typically adding approximately 40% to the cost of building those ships. If this happened in real life, and in some instances it does, it has a horrendous effect on economies both in New Eden and in RL. For those who got in before the changes to these ships there were significant profits to be made but after the fact construction of affected ships is ruined for months or longer. It does seem that CCP has, and is, making other changes to bring about and/or exacerbate the current fall in mineral prices to fix this situation. But this just brings about more problems for other careers and parts of the New Eden economy. At the moment the best we can hope is that once the T2 ships have all been 'rebalanced' that this plague stops at that threshold. I for one would not like to see capital ship & freighter BPO's touched with this infection.
before the patch people hoarded staggering amounts of the original price battleships. Like i have said above, the use of battleships is extremely rare now, they never really die, as they aren't worth the risk when you consider their cost.
This means we have literally thousands of stored battleships in sellers hangars, and almost zero demand for them. The result is that months after the patch was released, Geddons for example are still selling 70mil under the build cost. Currently thats good for the PVPer, but **** for the construction industry.
Your concerns is different to mine, but they are still linked.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11747
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 13:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote: Like i have said above, the use of battleships is extremely rare now, they never really die,
I don't believe you. Produce numbers.
eve-kill might be a good place to start.
1 Kings 12:11
|

IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
213
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 13:11:00 -
[8] - Quote
Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
|

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
172
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 13:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
PLEX isn't the benchmark for eve inflation so im not sure why that is relevant.
Make everything gradually more expensive, and make PLEX values look attractive as a way to fund the increase.
People buy ISK with cash to plug the gap, if PLEX was worth 135mil still people wouldn't bother, thats why CCP has engineered their value increase. That is about as simple as it gets from CCPs strategy. I don;t blame them, it's a business and it's how business works. But for people not willing to pay them even more money for the plexes, it becomes a tiresome strain.
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11749
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 13:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
PLEX isn't the benchmark for eve inflation so im not sure why that is relevant.
yes it is.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2840
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Ravens cost 135M or so when I started playing.
To put that into context, so did a 30 GTC card.
Highlighted the thing people are often missing when they form their incredibly dumb opinions about things :) .
|

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
253
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:20:00 -
[12] - Quote
this post got eaten - pls stand by... GÖ˝ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3633385&#post3633385
- 15% more tank since the 1.1-patch. |

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
172
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:38:00 -
[13] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Nova Satar wrote:IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
PLEX isn't the benchmark for eve inflation so im not sure why that is relevant. yes it is.
i honestly don't believe you're that ignorant, just very naive
just to clarify though, you're saying we've got it good and everything is bout 400% cheaper than it should be?
|

ZeeWolf Novus
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
36
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Ravens cost 135M or so when I started playing.
To put that into context, so did a 30 GTC card.
90-100mil back in the good old days  |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
93
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 14:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:Malcanis wrote:Nova Satar wrote:IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
PLEX isn't the benchmark for eve inflation so im not sure why that is relevant. yes it is. i honestly don't believe you're that ignorant, just very naive just to clarify though, you're saying we've got it good and everything is bout 400% cheaper than it should be? Wow If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11757
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 15:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote: i honestly don't believe you're that ignorant, just very naive
just to clarify though, you're saying we've got it good and everything is bout 400% cheaper than it should be?
I'm saying that you're making unsupported assertions and also you're using the rather low rhetorical trick of saying that "battleships are too expensive" without explaining what "not too expensive" or even "not expensive enough" would be.
I am providing data to the effect that relatively speaking battleships have been far more 'expensive' than they are now, using the only reliable metric of value that we have available (game time). It's scarcely disputable that the income of the average (median) EVE player in absolute ISK terms is much higher than it was in September 2006 (which is when I started playing).
Additionally, I flatly don't believe your claims that battleships aren't used in PvP and hardly ever die when they do, and I bet you don't either. I don't believe you're that ignorant either, just dishonest.
My personal experience totally contradicts that: not only are battleships once again the standard for fleets, they're used more than ever, and they die in large numbers tyvm. Looking at INIT's alliance killboard, with the campaign that conveniently started in 01.01.2013: http://killboard.the-initiative.com/?a=cc_detail&ctr_id=5 I see 1659 BS killed and 776 BS lost. That's just from one medium sized alliance. More to the point it shows more Battleships lost and killed than any other ship class.
You'll see a similar story in most PvP alliance killboards.
Furthermore, CCP have revitalised T1 cruisers and battlecruisers, giving players access to viable yet cheaper options if they feel that battleships are too expensive for their taste.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Battle BV Master
Executor BV Sovereign Infinity
29
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 15:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
Battleship prices have gone slightly up? Slightly? Really?
My first Domi (late 2010 aka a time period you also played in) cost me 59mil (that was market price in Jita, not a friend of a friend deal) Now they are 145mil.
Using rough math a Domi has gone up 2,5 times in price since I started playing. A Plex hasnt even doubled...
So if PLEX is a yardstick, then I'd say prices of Battleships have gone (way) up since I started playing. |

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
172
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 15:31:00 -
[18] - Quote
So do you believe 300mil per Rokh to be a fair price? For their purpose, their life, and how they come to an end, do you think 300mil is a fair cost?
i don't
i believe that is now too expensive.
plus it's worth pointing out that my very first line relates to certain types of pvp, obviously moonfest puppet fights where everyone is insta-popped and then reimbursed doesn't fall under the category of cost concern.
But still i'd like the know....
Why are they the price they are?
Why did CCP choose to "rebalance" all BS to the tier 3 price?
Will the other ship classes follow in this pattern? |

Jayka Kyer
Duty. The Cursed Few
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 16:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
I hold a very different view to you. I'm a solo and small gang pvper, it is now as easy as it has ever been to keep myself in ships, and this is coming from some on who has to use isk to pay for one of my 2 accounts now and then.
Yes plex prices might be higher but making isk is also easyer now too, lets say your a humble hisec miner, look at trit and nocx prices from when plexs were cheap and look at trit and nocx prices now.
it sounds like you need to look harder at your isk making methods rather than priceing diffrences over years.
what was that saying... adapt or die? |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1579
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 16:38:00 -
[20] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:IIshira wrote:[quote=Nova Satar]
Ships were balanced in the sense that they were given different purposes. I don't think the mineral costs were changed.
You obviously don't have anything to do with construction of ships or industry. Aside from the majority of the 'rebalancing' which I would argue has been largely unnecessary & destructive to other elements of EVE Online the mineral costs for all ships that have been 'rebalanced' has increased exponentially. 'Extra materials', which are not reduced by ME research, have been added to the BPO's for all ships that have been 'rebalanced'. These 'extra materials' are typically adding approximately 40% to the cost of building those ships. If this happened in real life, and in some instances it does, it has a horrendous effect on economies both in New Eden and in RL. For those who got in before the changes to these ships there were significant profits to be made but after the fact construction of affected ships is ruined for months or longer. It does seem that CCP has, and is, making other changes to bring about and/or exacerbate the current fall in mineral prices to fix this situation. But this just brings about more problems for other careers and parts of the New Eden economy. At the moment the best we can hope is that once the T2 ships have all been 'rebalanced' that this plague stops at that threshold. I for one would not like to see capital ship & freighter BPO's touched with this infection.
Umm wasn't that kind of the point of the OP's post? New ships haven't gotten expensive arbitrarily. CCP made a deliberate change in mineral requirements in order to influence the new price of rebalanced ships. At this point they could have chosen any number of amounts to make some ships more or less expensive by adjusting mineral costs. In large part they adjusted up to the highest tier.
[edit]
Oops i totally missed the "I don't think the mineral costs were changed. I must learn2read better. |

Baggo Hammers
121
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 16:59:00 -
[21] - Quote
It's all relative. If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there. |

Kasutra
Tailor Company
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 17:01:00 -
[22] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote:I realise CCP are pushing up prices in the hope people will plug the gap with PLEX because they are money grabbers, but for casual players not willing to buy plex are certain types of day to day PVP now too expensive?
CCP doesn't set prices.
Nova Satar wrote:When all three battleship tiers were balanced, why wasn't the price set to the MIDDLE tier ship? What was the reaosn behind making them all cot the same as the most expensive tier? Because their effectiveness was normalized to the top tier?
Regardless, BSes are in a better place than they have been in in years. And yes, that includes BSes in solo/small gang PvP.
Nova Satar wrote:I know alot of highsec and low-sec players will be wondering the same thing. I just hope CCP isn't hoping that when the isk runs out of peoples wallets they will simply buy more plex to cover it.
Okay, okay okay. Let's slow down here.
First, CCP doesn't make significantly more money from PLEX than they do from regular subscriptions. The difference is the difference between the cost of a regular month's subscription and the cost of a PLEX - it's not a direct money injection for CCP.
Second, PLEX doesn't generate ISK. Players generate ISK the way they always have, and happen to use PLEX as a medium.
Third, the ISK isn't running out. The symptom you see, the one that the ISK value of ships increasing, is one of the opposite situations - there is more ISK going around.
There's no conspiracy. It just so happens that the mineral cost of BSes is high, relegating them to PvE, fleets, and bold solo/small gang PvPers - as it should be. The ship average ship in space being around cruiser size is not an indicator of the ISK running out, it's an indicator of us finally using the full spectrum of ship sizes available in the game. |

Cyrus
Sacred Templars Fatal Ascension
2
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 17:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Somewhere, just outside a level 4 mission station in empire, we have one person talking about how rarely Battleships are used and lost in PvP. Somewhere in low sec we have three pirates in a geddon, tornado, and tengu attacking a lone explorer. Meanwhile there is a hot zone in in 0.0 where Huge fleets of battleships fight it out on regular basis.
|

Hoo Yodaad
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
6
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 17:23:00 -
[24] - Quote
Nova Satar wrote: I'm spacepoor.
I agree, but you should stop whining about it. |

Derath Ellecon
Washburne Holdings Situation: Normal
1579
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 18:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
Kasutra wrote:Nova Satar wrote:I realise CCP are pushing up prices in the hope people will plug the gap with PLEX because they are money grabbers, but for casual players not willing to buy plex are certain types of day to day PVP now too expensive? CCP doesn't set prices.
Not an entirely accurate statement in terms of ship rebalance. No CCP does not set prices in game for items built by players. But they directly adjusted potential prices by adjusting the ships build costs when they adjusted mineral requirements.
So CCP doesn't set prices, but they did actively influence them.
|

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
200
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 18:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
If players could actually insure faction, T2 and T3 ships - you'd see a lot more variety. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1423
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 18:53:00 -
[27] - Quote
Its not just bang for buck that causes it.
Soloing in battleships is extremely hard. Hench not a lot of people do it often. BYDI recruitment closed-ish |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
872
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 20:08:00 -
[28] - Quote
PvP;
Scout enemy. Decide what ships will overpower them. Get in said ships. Proceed to ROFLSTOMP kittens in a bag.
Do not engage otherwise. Use BS's where appropriate. Most non fail PvPers dont hop in a BS and go looking for PvP at any cost.
And a quick search of zkillboards shows me that BS PvP is far from dead. Eve is Real |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
11766
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 20:53:00 -
[29] - Quote
Battle BV Master wrote:IIshira wrote:Your question was "Is PVP becoming too expensive?" and the answer is no.
Since I started playing in 2009 the price of battleships has gone up slightly while the price of PLEX has almost doubled. Buy orders for PLEX used to be around 350 mil and currently they're over 600 mil in Jita. This means the actual real money cost of battleships have gone down.
Yes I don't know anything about manufacturing so you got me on that one. If something CCP did to mineral costs effects the price of ships down the road I can't say but currently this has not happened.
TLDR: It has always been expensive to lose battleships in PVP. This is nothing new and hasn't changed. Most people that PVP in more expensive ships take care not to lose them.
Battleship prices have gone slightly up? Slightly? Really? My first Domi (late 2010 aka a time period you also played in) cost me 59mil (that was market price in Jita, not a friend of a friend deal) Now they are 145mil. Using rough math a Domi has gone up 2,5 times in price since I started playing. A Plex hasnt even doubled... So if PLEX is a yardstick, then I'd say prices of Battleships have gone (way) up since I started playing.
It is worth mentioning that you started playing when mineral prices were at an absolute low point due to the systematic abusive farming of dronespace anomalies flooding the market with minerals. Effectively you went into the shop when it had a 75% Off All Prices sale, then came back a year later and remarked how all the prices were 4x what they used to be.
1 Kings 12:11
|

Eyana Starstruck
Samostalna Zanatska Radnja Devil Divided By Zero
18
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 21:21:00 -
[30] - Quote
I would just like to add that players also affect the ship price, domi wasnt that expensive cause it wasn't bought that often. Domi price went up after latest big patch in which domi was rebalanced to be a pure drone boat.
Edit
Not to mention that with that re balance it become a very good if not an op ship which we who saw the alliance tournament proved it was indeed a very very powerful ship and people flocked to it... Textbook supply and demand price change... |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |