Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

TehCloud
Mastercard.
116
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 08:17:00 -
[121] - Quote
1. Use a T2 Hauler which is immune to cargo scanners. 2. be immune to cargo scans. 3. ?????? 4. PROFIT! My Condor costs less than that module! |

Mocam
EVE University Ivy League
309
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 08:21:00 -
[122] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:Nicen Jehr wrote:Mole Guy wrote: fast forward to today. my alt undocked from jita with a hauler. it was scanned by a criminal i can do nothing too and popped by someone else. this is an exploit.
your fault for not using an insta-undock. the first chance someone should get to scan you is when you break gate cloak your first jump out of jita see, what a stupid reply. it doesnt matter WHERE you get scanned. it matters that they DO scan you. once they do, no matter WHERE you are, you run the risk of being shot. auto targeter, hot guns, when u go flashy, you pop. pretty soon, itll cost you 50-100 mill a day to run this operation. just think of how many ship you guys scan.. pop, pop, pop, pop and im not a hauler. im not a pve guy. im not a pvper. im a person who does a little of all. when i fly somewhere, i expect to be able to defend myself. thats it. i myself, will park my combat guys (i have multiple toons) in high traveled areas where they are camps and gank the gankers. i will make it my mission to cost you guys. because i can. everytime you scan someone, pop. its automatic. cant be avoided. go get another ship. i will spend a couple weeks in high sec just for fun. rack up a noob ship kill log from hell. oh, btw...go get another ship.
I will give you a simple restatement of what I posted earlier.
You won't stop random ganks with this. All you do is remove those who *DO* think, plan and use tactics for piracy.
That is not improving the game at all - it is quite literally "dumbing down" an activity that currently shows that someone is thinking and planning for what they do.
Do you really want those types removed from that kind of activity so only the half-wit drooling monkeys are left doing this?
IMO -- If you're going to lose a ship to someone, better it be to someone who actually thought about what they were doing and *PICKED* you as a target vs just a random drive-by shooting or moron gate-camper popping targets for lulz. |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
664
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 08:27:00 -
[123] - Quote
TehCloud wrote:1. Use a T2 Hauler which is immune to cargo scanners. 2. be immune to cargo scans. 3. ?????? 4. PROFIT!
Ah someone else who doesn't know what they are talking about\can't read 4 pages of a thread before posting in a thread. Go try and haul anything in T2 Blockade Runner at least once and then comment back after you've read the thread.
T2 Industrials are mentioned in-depth on Page 2/3 by myself. Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Ciaphas Cyne
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 09:23:00 -
[124] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:
if u missed it, thats ur poor reading and comprehension skills. Everyone else understood it just fine.
youve got really great selective hearing.
a true sign of a weak mind is the unwillingness to address critique. ive responded to your... "points", if you wish to call them that. furthermore, if you cannot derive a rebuttal that elevates your position in my mind then that, sir, is your fault. not mine. i do say, you're conversational skills are reminiscent of a priest in heat.
good day sir. "buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"
- you |

TehCloud
Mastercard.
116
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 09:31:00 -
[125] - Quote
Maximus Aerelius wrote:TehCloud wrote:1. Use a T2 Hauler which is immune to cargo scanners. 2. be immune to cargo scans. 3. ?????? 4. PROFIT! Ah someone else who doesn't know what they are talking about\can't read 4 pages of a thread before posting in a thread. Go try and haul anything in T2 Blockade Runner at least once and then comment back after you've read the thread. T2 Industrials are mentioned in-depth on Page 3 by myself.
Saying Blockade runners have little cargo is hardly mentioning something in-depth.
They made ships with special roles for a reason. In a Blockade Runner, noone will be able to scan you.
Even in a T1 Hauler with a Cloak noone will be able to scan you if you aren't stupid. So how is getting scanned a problem? This thread is almost as pathetic as the make highsec safer thread.
But I still like the idea on the limited engagement for scanning. I'd love to be able to shoot freighters anywhere at anytime. My Condor costs less than that module! |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
664
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 09:49:00 -
[126] - Quote
TehCloud wrote:Maximus Aerelius wrote:TehCloud wrote:1. Use a T2 Hauler which is immune to cargo scanners. 2. be immune to cargo scans. 3. ?????? 4. PROFIT! Ah someone else who doesn't know what they are talking about\can't read 4 pages of a thread before posting in a thread. Go try and haul anything in T2 Blockade Runner at least once and then comment back after you've read the thread. T2 Industrials are mentioned in-depth on Page 3 by myself. Saying Blockade runners have little cargo is hardly mentioning something in-depth. They made ships with special roles for a reason. In a Blockade Runner, noone will be able to scan you. Even in a T1 Hauler with a Cloak noone will be able to scan you if you aren't stupid. So how is getting scanned a problem? This thread is almost as pathetic as the make highsec safer thread. But I still like the idea on the limited engagement for scanning. I'd love to be able to shoot freighters anywhere at anytime.
Actually I added on the idea that immunity to cargo scanning should be extended to all T2 Blockade Runners and Deep Space Transports.
Yes, these were made for, surprise, running Blockades. Read the description again and also this "There are two variants, one able to hold more cargo, and one able to move and align faster, allowing for quick escapes."
Now you try hauling anything as a serious trader in, for arguments sake, say a Prowler. That ain't really gonna happen.
The funny thing about these is that it would've made more sense to add the immunity to Cargo Scanning to the Deep Space Transport and not the Blockade Runners as the BR has the ability to cloak and warp thus removing the risk of being scanned.
You merely address the inefficient workarounds that people use to deal with the "problem" of Cargo Scanning before ganks rather than addressing the idea in the OP.
Keep on trolling mate. Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Daichi Yamato
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
797
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:13:00 -
[127] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:
it doesnt matter WHERE you get scanned. it matters that they DO scan you. once they do, no matter WHERE you are, you run the risk of being shot.
no matter where u are u run the risk of getting shot by undocking... There are no vets in EVE. Only varying levels of Noobery. |

Ciaphas Cyne
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
51
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:20:00 -
[128] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Mole Guy wrote:
it doesnt matter WHERE you get scanned. it matters that they DO scan you. once they do, no matter WHERE you are, you run the risk of being shot.
no matter where u are u run the risk of getting shot by undocking...
unless you're in a scanning ship. git. "buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"
- you |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
664
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:31:00 -
[129] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Mole Guy wrote:
it doesnt matter WHERE you get scanned. it matters that they DO scan you. once they do, no matter WHERE you are, you run the risk of being shot.
no matter where u are u run the risk of getting shot by undocking...
Yes, we all know that EVE is a dangerous\harsh\unforgiving blah blah blah place ( abit like the Forums sometimes ha ha) and the only safe place is in dock. We aren't asking for a comforter or a blanky...just battering around some ideas to bring something new\different to the table.
Sorry, wasn't having a go just I've heard these lines so many times... Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Daichi Yamato
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
797
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:35:00 -
[130] - Quote
which is fair enough.
i'm just stressing what i believe is the root cause of ganking: Undocking in something that might be worth ganking There are no vets in EVE. Only varying levels of Noobery. |
|

TehCloud
Mastercard.
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:46:00 -
[131] - Quote
Maximus Aerelius, fit a MWD, fit a Cloak. Be immune to Cargo Scanners if you're smart enough to use insta undocks and similar smart things. My Condor costs less than that module! |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
668
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 10:57:00 -
[132] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:which is fair enough.
i'm just stressing what i believe is the root cause of ganking: Undocking in something that might be worth ganking
So any industrial hauler then? And we should all just live with that? And that there's no defence or way to combat the gankers except to just re-ship and try again? I don't believe that the EVE community is so willing to accept that or maybe it's false hope  Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
668
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 11:00:00 -
[133] - Quote
TehCloud wrote:Maximus Aerelius, fit a MWD, fit a Cloak. Be immune to Cargo Scanners if you're smart enough to use insta undocks and similar smart things.
While I appreciate the above it doesn't address the issue merely the workaround. And I personally do all of the above along with fitting Inertia Stabs, Warp Core Stabs where required etc. ectc. etc. and GTFO PDQ ASAP of the gate...believe me I know not to AFK haul as well.
This isn't the issue. The issue is the "peeping toms" who have no consequences to "popping my trailer doors" to see if anything is worth stealing.
EDIT: Oh and the MWD blows your signature up +500% making it quicker to lock you down...if the gankers are fast they'll get you. If the person Cargo Scanning you is quick they'll get you scanned quicker and let the gankers know you're using a MWD\Cloak trick...easier to scan you, easier to gank you.
EDIT 2: Practical example:
Mastodon - T2 Deep Space Transport Signature Radius150 m. MWD Active: 900m (150 + 750 from MWD) Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Anomaly One
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 12:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
This doesn't make ganking harder it just gives more opportunities for ship explosions! which is what we all want right? well, except the gankers complaining here.. how does this make highsec any safer you're still gonna destroy the freighter if it has nice loot you just can't go around doing it the easiest way now.
I don't think people are getting the idea here especially the gankers, it's not about making highsec safer or easier for freighters it's about consequences, cargo scanning is equal to truck scanning or someone openning the lock of your car to check out what's inside, looking through a car irl is the same as look at ship command has nothing to do with cargo scanning, and ship scanning is like popping the hood.
Great idea. |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
396
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 12:39:00 -
[135] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:which is fair enough.
i'm just stressing what i believe is the root cause of ganking: Undocking in something that might be worth ganking im afraid this statement isnt correct.
the root cause of gankings are pieces of crap who cant go earn a buck for themselves. they would rather sit somewhere where there is no risk for them and shoot defenseless things and take.
i rat, i build, i go in worm holes and do gas or mine, run sites, i do a wide variety of things to positively contribute. i have given away tons of rigs from salvage to noobs who cant afford to buy stuff for their new ship.
this is MY play style. this is how *I* like to play. i am not saying everyone else has too, but *I* get the most enjoyment out of helping others.
gankers are afraid to go somewhere where they might be targeted and chased down. they sit in high secuntil they find something easy to steal. of course, with my 10 years of military, i find this and those who do it to be the lowest forms of life, but thats *THEIR* play style.
all i am asking for is the ability to hold accountable *ALL* people involved with the process. if the scanner has to reship every 3 seconds and has to buy cargo scanners every 3 seconds, itll eventually break them. i would shoot the wreck so the scanner couldnt be reused. every scan....pop.
every time.
you play your way, make it right so i can patrol and defend the weak against the lazy. |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
670
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 12:54:00 -
[136] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:which is fair enough.
i'm just stressing what i believe is the root cause of ganking: Undocking in something that might be worth ganking im afraid this statement isnt correct. the root cause of gankings are pieces of crap who cant go earn a buck for themselves. they would rather sit somewhere where there is no risk for them and shoot defenseless things and take. i rat, i build, i go in worm holes and do gas or mine, run sites, i do a wide variety of things to positively contribute. i have given away tons of rigs from salvage to noobs who cant afford to buy stuff for their new ship. this is MY play style. this is how *I* like to play. i am not saying everyone else has too, but *I* get the most enjoyment out of helping others. gankers are afraid to go somewhere where they might be targeted and chased down. they sit in high secuntil they find something easy to steal. of course, with my 10 years of military, i find this and those who do it to be the lowest forms of life, but thats *THEIR* play style. all i am asking for is the ability to hold accountable *ALL* people involved with the process. if the scanner has to reship every 3 seconds and has to buy cargo scanners every 3 seconds, itll eventually break them. i would shoot the wreck so the scanner couldnt be reused. every scan....pop. every time. you play your way, make it right so i can patrol and defend the weak against the lazy.
No surprise but I have to agree with Mole Guy. If they have to scrap alts because they got popped for scanning by someone and have to do thta so often it will eventually turn into either you get "Professional Scanners" as a career (a new career path perhaps) or people get so sick of creating new chars that they no longer use disposable alts.
I, personally, have never seen the joy in ganking haulers\cargo runners. It seems cowardly and bottom feeding to me but that's my opinion. You bite the hand that feeds you and you're going to starve...
I'm all for cause and consequence as well and if I went around breaking the locks on truck doors in a freight yard I'd expect security to say "OI! WTF do you think you're doing" and then the big hairy arsed trucker driver to come out and kick my arse (or at least the co-driver). Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
397
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 13:22:00 -
[137] - Quote
Maximus Aerelius wrote:Mole Guy wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:which is fair enough.
i'm just stressing what i believe is the root cause of ganking: Undocking in something that might be worth ganking im afraid this statement isnt correct. the root cause of gankings are pieces of crap who cant go earn a buck for themselves. they would rather sit somewhere where there is no risk for them and shoot defenseless things and take. i rat, i build, i go in worm holes and do gas or mine, run sites, i do a wide variety of things to positively contribute. i have given away tons of rigs from salvage to noobs who cant afford to buy stuff for their new ship. this is MY play style. this is how *I* like to play. i am not saying everyone else has too, but *I* get the most enjoyment out of helping others. gankers are afraid to go somewhere where they might be targeted and chased down. they sit in high secuntil they find something easy to steal. of course, with my 10 years of military, i find this and those who do it to be the lowest forms of life, but thats *THEIR* play style. all i am asking for is the ability to hold accountable *ALL* people involved with the process. if the scanner has to reship every 3 seconds and has to buy cargo scanners every 3 seconds, itll eventually break them. i would shoot the wreck so the scanner couldnt be reused. every scan....pop. every time. you play your way, make it right so i can patrol and defend the weak against the lazy. No surprise but I have to agree with Mole Guy. If they have to scrap alts because they got popped for scanning by someone and have to do thta so often it will eventually turn into either you get "Professional Scanners" as a career (a new career path perhaps) or people get so sick of creating new chars that they no longer use disposable alts. I, personally, have never seen the joy in ganking haulers\cargo runners. It seems cowardly and bottom feeding to me but that's my opinion. You bite the hand that feeds you and you're going to starve... I'm all for cause and consequence as well and if I went around breaking the locks on truck doors in a freight yard I'd expect security to say "OI! WTF do you think you're doing" and then the big hairy arsed trucker driver to come out and kick my arse (or at least the co-driver). i agree. i am not saying you cant gank me. im saying its going to cost you so much, over time you will get off your lazy azzes and go do something useful.
and check this coward out who sent me an email in game. i dont think he used his main nor would he post it in here..
"pop, pop, pop, pop" From: xxx x xx Sent: 2013.10.02 13:00 To: Mole Guy,
do freighters and haulers if they carry too much.
Its ok this way, gankers already loose their ships. No more safety for high sec, **** off stupid moron.
keep it on the forums. |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
671
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 13:28:00 -
[138] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:"pop, pop, pop, pop" From: xxx x xx Sent: 2013.10.02 13:00 To: Mole Guy,
do freighters and haulers if they carry too much.
Its ok this way, gankers already loose their ships. No more safety for high sec, **** off stupid moron.
keep it on the forums.
See that kind of message really annoys me and I'd report it for harassment. Forums is forums and should stay that way but the maturity of some can seriously be questioned with that kind of message.
It's a shame because I've had some awesome discussions with the likes of Lucas Kell, Nago and Nikk Narrel to name but a few (and they've got heated, oh have they) but they never went so far as to harrass my inbox.
Keep it on the forums folks and keep it civil  Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
397
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 13:35:00 -
[139] - Quote
Maximus Aerelius wrote:Mole Guy wrote:"pop, pop, pop, pop" From: xxx x xx Sent: 2013.10.02 13:00 To: Mole Guy,
do freighters and haulers if they carry too much.
Its ok this way, gankers already loose their ships. No more safety for high sec, **** off stupid moron.
keep it on the forums. See that kind of message really annoys me and I'd report it for harassment. Forums is forums and should stay that way but the maturity of some can seriously be questioned with that kind of message. It's a shame because I've had some awesome discussions with the likes of Lucas Kell, Nago and Nikk Narrel to name but a few (and they've got heated, oh have they) but they never went so far as to harrass my inbox. Keep it on the forums folks and keep it civil  well, they couldnt have a heated debate...they would be coming unarmed. i love a good debate. you bring up good points, bring out your argument, i will do the same. let me see where you stand. lets come to an agreement thats beneficial to all. but throwing names or posting without being informed or only seeing one small side is lame.
i have apologized several times on these forums for being uninformed or making assumptions. nikk does have some weird ideas at times, but bad azz ideas other times. but i respect folks who bring it here, put up a good debate/argument and keep it here reguardless the out come. |

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
672
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:00:00 -
[140] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:nikk does have some weird ideas at times, but bad azz ideas other times.
Especially the one with Marauders replenishing ammo...I really thought he was smoking some good shizz that night but it wasn't that crazy lol.
Any way, back on topic, there's some strong feeling on this I see and it's certainly getting some good constructive comments going both for and against. Let's hope it keeps going that way and the trolling to a minimum eh.
Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |
|

Krissada
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
172
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:33:00 -
[141] - Quote
Roime wrote:
Well suggesting ship scanning to be made an aggression is not really as much carebearing as wanting to keep it safe.
Ship scanning has only offensive purpose in the game, so yes, it should cause a suspect timer.
WOW is that way ---> Remember to biomass your characters as well.
|

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
672
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:38:00 -
[142] - Quote
Krissada wrote:Roime wrote:
Well suggesting ship scanning to be made an aggression is not really as much carebearing as wanting to keep it safe.
Ship scanning has only offensive purpose in the game, so yes, it should cause a suspect timer.
WOW is that way ---> Remember to biomass your characters as well.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote. Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee" Undocking - More Routes Out of Station Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |

Madlof Chev
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
256
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:38:00 -
[143] - Quote
god damn why is this thread seven pages
people like you are literally what's killing this game |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
399
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:52:00 -
[144] - Quote
Madlof Chev wrote:god damn why is this thread seven pages
people like you are literally what's killing this game why, because i want to be able to engage you for being a low life, high sec ganker? again, im not asking for concord to intervene, just allow me to shoot u for scanning me.
dig through my truck, you will meet st peter or whom ever you believe in.
look through my ship, and i wanna know so i can put u in the grave. |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
15557
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 16:22:00 -
[145] - Quote
Can we please keep the name calling and derisory comments on other people play style out if this. You can justify this idea without such things.
Also it still remains against the rules to post personal mail here. You're not helping your stance by doing any of these things.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 18:28:00 -
[146] - Quote
Time to revisit the OP. The theme was active scanning of ships (including both ship modules and cargos). The original proposal was to trigger a suspect offence, but as has been suggested (and I concur) - a more balanced approach would be to trigger a limited engagement with the offending vessel. I don't think this is an unreasonable change to the game, and it's not ultimately going to change gameplay significantly. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Mole Guy
Xoth Inc
400
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 18:33:00 -
[147] - Quote
what im looking for is not just a limited engagement between the 2 parties, i want it to anyone can shoot. what good is having a limited engagement between a hauler and a scanning ship?
i think anyone should be able to engage, but no concord interference.
i will setup a corp or fleet around every main gate on a trade route or outside every main station.
you go flashy from scanning ANYONE, i will pop ya.
not just between the 2 people.
what ever you wanna call it, thats the desired effect i seek. i will build a corp around hunting these people down. will make it more costly to leave folks alone. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 19:01:00 -
[148] - Quote
Mole Guy wrote:what im looking for is not just a limited engagement between the 2 parties, i want it to anyone can shoot. what good is having a limited engagement between a hauler and a scanning ship?
i think anyone should be able to engage, but no concord interference.
i will setup a corp or fleet around every main gate on a trade route or outside every main station.
you go flashy from scanning ANYONE, i will pop ya.
not just between the 2 people.
what ever you wanna call it, thats the desired effect i seek. i will build a corp around hunting these people down. will make it more costly to leave folks alone. Respectfully, I think suspect status would be overkill. When you steal something, said action is (at least in theory) viewable or detectable by others. The act of targeting and scanning is a little different. How would anyone else know, for instance? In fact, if they use a passive targeting system I don't think there's any way you'd even be alerted.
I appreciate your viewpoint, but for any type of valuable cargo there are alternate ways of securely transporting it - from wrapping it inside of a container to using an insta-dock/undock to moving it in a tanked combat vessel. I got gate-ganked once in a rather expensive Tengu fit (though not obscenely ridiculous), because I'd been passively scanned at a previous jump gate and wasn't aware of the danger lurking just around the next jump. Such is life, but it taught me a lot of invaluable lessons - and I've never been ganked since. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Ciaphas Cyne
Turalyon Plus Turalyon Alliance
52
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 19:33:00 -
[149] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:This doesn't make ganking harder it just gives more opportunities for ship explosions! which is what we all want right? well, except the gankers complaining here.. how does this make highsec any safer you're still gonna destroy the freighter if it has nice loot you just can't go around doing it the easiest way now.
I don't think people are getting the idea here especially the gankers, it's not about making highsec safer or easier for freighters it's about consequences, cargo scanning is equal to truck scanning or someone openning the lock of your car to check out what's inside, looking through a car irl is the same as look at ship command has nothing to do with cargo scanning, and ship scanning is like popping the hood.
Great idea.
this guy gets it. we dont want less ganks, we just want the scanner ship concorded along with the rest of the ganking team. all you NPC corp carebears (haulers and gankers) have totally missed the point of the OP. we dont want high sec safer, and we dont want ganking to be easier. we just want all members of a ganking team to be treated equally. if that extra 500k totally throws your ganking profitability out the window then you are doing it wrong and suck at high sec ganks.
just a side note for the "gtfo and play wow" guy:
idk if you've ever played wow but i did back in highschool ('05 or so?) so i can clear up some confusion. on PVP servers in WoW there is no place on the map that you can avoid being jumped and ganked. you dont get to "scan" someones items for free, or have the benefit of being "a grey". In wow, if i see you, you are gonna die. simple as that. its actually less carebearish then how many people play EvE. I was the World PvP commander for my guild and i can attest that many, many, folks learned the hard way that by signing into Azeroth youve agreed to get ganked at any moment, at any time, by anyone that feels like it. so although its fun and easy to say "go play wow, carebear" its not really that much of a carebears game if your on a PvP server. and mind you there are no aggression timers in wow, no police to save the newbs, and no "docking up". quite frankly, i think many eve players (especially mission runners) would rage quite a PvP server on WoW faster than a nerd goes through mountain dew and funions.
and now you know. "buff only the stuff I fly and nerf everything else"
- you |
|

ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
163

|
Posted - 2013.10.02 19:39:00 -
[150] - Quote
Trolling post and personal atttack post were removed.
Forum rule 5. Trolling is prohibited. ISD Tyrozan Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department @ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |