Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Karmilla Strife
Stormcrows
143
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:22:00 -
[181] - Quote
If we're only going by the opinions of the Empires and Mortals, then I'm an exemplar of the Amarr Empire, a Divine Commodore of it's navies, a Paladin of it's Theology Council, and a trusted agent of it's Ministry of Internal Order. There is a reason why this is not the case for beings such as us.
I don't care about the OP. If you want to **** your way to the top, good on you. But, the opinions of those beneath all of our status are likewise beneath all of our notice. |

Liuni Kalthis
Alexylva Paradox
28
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:24:00 -
[182] - Quote
I have no idea what this has turned into. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1181
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:27:00 -
[183] - Quote
Please describe in detail the accomplishments and specific personal traits the baseliners adore in you.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2374
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:27:00 -
[184] - Quote
Saber1 wrote: I think Miss Dea aims to enlighten everyone to how much of a joke your channel really is.
So, the aim is to discourage others from connecting to it? The ideal outcome would be that everybody stops connecting to the Summit and goes elsewhere?
Quote:EDIT: But seriously, I think it's about time everyone stopped posting and let this channel die in peace.
Channel or thread?
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
295
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:31:00 -
[185] - Quote
Bai'xao Meiyi wrote: This is by far the most despicable thing I've ever heard from a priest of any kind. Arrogant, disgusting, racist, violent, utterly unnecessary and deeply educational as to just what sort of people guard the Amarr faith. People who will gladly side with a criminal organization of soul destroying infidels who abduct millions hailing from his own faith at every opportunity and a psychopathic Blood Raider who gladly puts thousands of lives in peril, simply for gambling's sake just to spew forth filth at an ex slave.
The fact that you share a title with Kithrus, disgusts me. Such a vile little man gets to be on the same level as him, is trusted to educate anyone on morality and faith.
There are many double standards at work in The Summit than just the ones I've raised. An example of how corrupt the channel really has become.
Katrina Oniseki wrote: In the ideal scenario, what would happen for you to be satisfied with the outcome of this thread?
An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel.
Also a gentle push in nudging the community toward a more fitting one.
And maybe a little in general enlightenment overall to the real nature of your little Summit club.
Although bonus freakin' points if ya'll dare to clean house because of this. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1181
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:34:00 -
[186] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Bai'xao Meiyi wrote: This is by far the most despicable thing I've ever heard from a priest of any kind. Arrogant, disgusting, racist, violent, utterly unnecessary and deeply educational as to just what sort of people guard the Amarr faith. People who will gladly side with a criminal organization of soul destroying infidels who abduct millions hailing from his own faith at every opportunity and a psychopathic Blood Raider who gladly puts thousands of lives in peril, simply for gambling's sake just to spew forth filth at an ex slave.
The fact that you share a title with Kithrus, disgusts me. Such a vile little man gets to be on the same level as him, is trusted to educate anyone on morality and faith.
There are many double standards at work in The Summit than just the ones I've raised. An example of how corrupt the channel really has become. Katrina Oniseki wrote: In the ideal scenario, what would happen for you to be satisfied with the outcome of this thread?
An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel. Also a gentle push in nudging the community toward a more fitting one. And maybe a little in general enlightenment overall to the real nature of your little Summit club. Although bonus freakin' points if ya'll dare to clean house because of this.
'Intergalactic Summit' is an alternative channel that is I believe officially neutral?
It does not seem very popular, but I'm sure that has nothing to do with the few people who spend time there?
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2375
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:38:00 -
[187] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote: An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel.
Also a gentle push in nudging the community toward a more fitting one.
And maybe a little in general enlightenment overall to the real nature of your little Summit club.
Although bonus freakin' points if ya'll dare to clean house because of this.
I see.
Thank you for your answer. |

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:39:00 -
[188] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:
'Intergalactic Summit' is an alternative channel that is I believe officially neutral?
It does not seem very popular, but I'm sure that has nothing to do with the few people who spend time there?
I'm sure when it comes to the services of chatting and (truly) sharing the opinions of all New Eden, another channel will surface in time that can actually do what it says it does. Without bias, preferred.
Karmilla Strife wrote:Bla bla, the opinions of those beneath all of our statusGǪ
I find it cute that you consider the sum of your being to a social rank that is written off the opinion of a channel that is anything but neutral.
You're something else. |

Saber1
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
31
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:44:00 -
[189] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote: Channel or thread?
Thread, sorry.
|

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1181
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:44:00 -
[190] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:Isis Dea wrote: An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel.
Also a gentle push in nudging the community toward a more fitting one.
And maybe a little in general enlightenment overall to the real nature of your little Summit club.
Although bonus freakin' points if ya'll dare to clean house because of this.
I see. Thank you for your answer.
I think she's going for some sort of Martyr status and hoping to be ejected from the Summit.
Afterwords a popular revolt in the channel!
"BRING BACK ISIS!" they will demand. BRING BACK OUR CHAMPION.
Their voice will shake the heavens.
|
|

Pieter Tuulinen
Pyre Falcon Defence Cadre XV-01A Pyre Falcon Defence Combine
2232
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:47:00 -
[191] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote: In the ideal scenario, what would happen for you to be satisfied with the outcome of this thread?
An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel.
I can do an impression.
"Ooh! Elevate and vindicate me by inclusion into the Moderator Team. No? Then your channel is a laughing stock and will only remain as the most frequented touchstone for Capsuleer networking until one that does service my need for validation eclipses it!"
Sorry. I didn't get the accent right, I know. |

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
302
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:51:00 -
[192] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:Isis Dea wrote: An impression. One that I can quote for later times when it comes to how much stock one can put in your laughingstock of a channel.
Also a gentle push in nudging the community toward a more fitting one.
And maybe a little in general enlightenment overall to the real nature of your little Summit club.
Although bonus freakin' points if ya'll dare to clean house because of this.
I see. Thank you for your answer. I think she's going for some sort of Martyr status and hoping to be ejected from the Summit. Afterwords a popular revolt in the channel! "BRING BACK ISIS!" they will demand. BRING BACK OUR CHAMPION. Their voice will shake the heavens.
The fact you imply I would be ejecting for carrying the opinions I have implies you're anything but neutral.
I question your right to be a moderator or to even moderate, since I am a voice of New Eden and my issues surface from the foundations of each of the empires (where especially it comes to the example of Sansha). At times, especially if true to the character in the mirror, there will be people who will hate you for being youGǪ
And you ban them rather than welcome their opinion.
That's an act only fitting for scum. |

Kasuko Merin
Ravenworks Industrial
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:54:00 -
[193] - Quote
Helluva lot of 'implying' and speculation in this thread. |

Liuni Kalthis
Alexylva Paradox
28
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:56:00 -
[194] - Quote
Kasuko Merin wrote:Helluva lot of 'implying' and speculation in this thread.
Welcome to the IGS, it is interesting to read however. |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2377
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:57:00 -
[195] - Quote
If you wouldn't mind, Isis, I'd like to ask you a few more questions.
Which of the eight moderators do you 'question the right to moderate'?
What is your overall and/or specific opinion on each of the eight moderators of The Summit?
Do these opinions reflect your overall opinion of the Summit's content?
If one were to avoid connecting to The Summit, what would be an alternative venue you'd suggest to them?
Do you take issue with The Summit the users, the moderators, or the way the channel works?
Do you feel that you could improve these issues? If so, how?
In your opinion, what would be the single most important change to the Summit? |

Scherezad
Lai Dai Research Spacelane Security
1259
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:59:00 -
[196] - Quote
Please forgve me, but this all seems to be a little bit... show-y? Perhaps it is too Caldari of me, but this seems the sort of question best answered by the free market. Let us buy the product we like most, and place the owness on the manufacturer to do the selling.
The Summit is a well-known brand and carries some manner of clout, regardless of the more questionable elements you highlight. If you wish to claim market share, or damage its own current share, however, you will have to do more than a smear campaign - you will have to show a better product for us to purchase in its place. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1183
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 00:06:00 -
[197] - Quote
Scherezad wrote:Please forgve me, but this all seems to be a little bit... show-y? Perhaps it is too Caldari of me, but this seems the sort of question best answered by the free market. Let us buy the product we like most, and place the onus on the manufacturer to do the selling.
The Summit is a well-known brand and carries some manner of clout, regardless of the more questionable elements you highlight. If you wish to claim market share, or damage its own current share, however, you will have to do more than a smear campaign - you will have to show a better product for us to purchase in its place.
It's hard to market 'butthurt.'
Bitter taste that product, no matter how you try and dress it up.
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
302
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:26:00 -
[198] - Quote
To Katrina Oniseki:
Which of the eight moderators do you 'question the right to moderate'? The following I question the right to "publicly" moderate The Summit ((with no offense to any of them personally)):
- Tiberious Thessalonia - The man is an enemy to 90% of New Eden. To stay true to ourselves (if part of said side of New Eden) means we're attack him constantly. That plus even suggesting his own opinion automatically brings many to want to fight/contest it due to his affiliation alone.
- Ava Starfire - Her taboo of edgy conflicts and subjects cause her to dodge a far percentage of what actually is New Eden, especially where you dare let all sides of New Eden be involved. That and she doesn't voice radical Minmatar nor the Tribes outside her own very well.
- Silas Vitalia - Her particular brand of Sani Sabik is very untraditional of others following the Sani Sabik way and those of the Empire should be allowed to follow their leaders in condemning her and her faith. I also find her ego getting in the way of judgement far more than it should.
Other than that I have no issue with any of the channel's moderators.
What is your overall and/or specific opinion on each of the eight moderators of The Summit? - This part is key: I love them. They are sharp examples of sides of New Eden and bring to show flavors any pilot should be exposed to with time. They're bold, strong in their opinions, and back themselves formidably. Yet as moderators, especially when such examples such as those I raise within this topic surface, that nature can get in the way of maintaining neutrality very quickly.
Do these opinions reflect your overall opinion of the Summit's content? - Not just my own, but a vast many others who've recently reached out to me. If you're ever wondering about why strong characters haven't been surfacing recently or sought to desire seat within contributing to the channel's purpose, that's why. They have been cut down by these views.
If one were to avoid connecting to The Summit, what would be an alternative venue you'd suggest to them? - At this point, I find neutrality is truly impossible. At least not without allowing personal attacks and characters to bound off each other, even in the edgy nature I try to bring to show. I'd recommend more focused channels featuring the sides of certain laws. But I don't want to give up on the melting pot just yet...
Do you take issue with The Summit the users, the moderators, or the way the channel works? - I find the channel's purpose incredibly noble, yet entirely impossible. Yet I've not lost complete hope, hence why I don't want to run just yet. I think it's more a justice to let all of you know there's something wrong. Even if it means shadowing the meaning of this topic under an attack. I'm afraid that's just more myself, a character sticking true to herself, working. Any additional issues have already been (or are further down) listed.
Do you feel that you could improve these issues? If so, how? - Moderators moderate indirectly, from the shadows, without expressed opinion and intervene only when there's been a clear violation. Classic goers of the channel should know that if they want proper intervention, they need to bait the troubled characters into truly going too far. - Personal attacks should be entirely allowed if you're truly allowing even the controversial to thrive amongst the populace. At least to a large (but certain) extent. - If you truly want a state of neutrality then you shift the channel's ownership (publicly) to CONCORD and the rightful owners of the IGS (as to imply within your channel's title). Also denying posers of the CONCORD ((CCP)) affiliation would add a large extent of legitimacy.
Up to this point, while surely not an official channel, this channel has functioned very similarly to one, providing users with the largest community of capsuleers for a forum. That is something incredibly spectacular but also heralds a very large responsibility.
In your opinion, what would be the single most important change to the Summit? - Reintegrate neutrality. Should that be the freedom of personal attacks and the true floodgates of New Eden's dark nature opened. Or catering to certain laws and holding true to them. In either case, eliminate personal opinions of moderators affecting any act of moderation.
DISCLAIMER: Please do not use these words against me. I am one of the worst examples of any potential moderator and have absolutely no intention of trying to play that role nor climb any social ladder. I've been sitting very quiet for a very long time since the earlier days of The Summit, patiently watching it plummet into what it is now.
It didn't start this way. Even if it means condemning myself amongst the majority to raise these issues to light, I will. I won't wear gloves, I won't be nice, I'll insult far more than I'll likely contribute.
But that is also me, my character, and the curse of.
Just another shade of New Eden, Isis |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1183
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 01:52:00 -
[199] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote: I also find her ego getting in the way of judgement far more than it should.
Provide specific examples of moderator actions that are the result of this, or is this more your opinion than fact?
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2380
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:07:00 -
[200] - Quote
That post has been far more helpful than the entire rest of the thread combined. Thank you for writing it. I'd like to address some concerns of yours, if I may.
First, and before I go any further - allow me to state openly that we know we are not neutral, and we cannot be neutral. You are correct in that this is an impossible goal, as we found it to be long long ago. This is the single largest reason CONCORD decided to break off association from "The Summit" and finally make the effort to make an official CONCORD supported "Intergalactic Summit" channel.
In The Summit, we do not seek neutrality or unbiased moderation. The Summit was originally intended to be something quite different from what it is now, as you already pointed out. Instead, using a word you so appropriate used above, we've opted for the "Melting Pot" ideal, where we allow various cultures to intermingle and only act to bring a sense of civility to the channel. This is perhaps key to what we're trying to do. We're attempting, albeit ineffectively or outright failing at times, to keep the channel civil, not neutral. There is a significant difference.
The Summit is a meeting place of peers, not an official forum for discourse and neutrality. It is, in effect, a club or bar or lounge. You used the word 'club' once before in the pejorative sense, and it's more accurate than you might think. It's a place where fellows of a kind (capsuleers and DUST clones) can get together and chat under the very loose pretense of not smashing each other over the head with the beer bottles. Under that metaphor, the moderators are little more than volunteer bouncers. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that it is a venue more akin to CONCORD's Inner Circle Chambers.
When we tell you to go to the "Intergalactic Summit" channel, we're not telling you to **** off. Well, okay sometimes we are. The point is, we're trying to point out a very different alternative which is closer to what you're describing The Summit should be. We're telling you to go there because we cannot be and will never be what you want. You want this lounge to be an embassy. It's not.
We literally cannot (meaning we are unable to) hand over control to CONCORD. They don't want it. They have their own channel, named the very same as this forum.
We cannot enforce neutrality while being non-neutral ourselves. I'm sorry, but we're volunteer moderators. Not professionals. We could of course be professionals if the users of The Summit wanted to start paying membership fees, and at that point we could seriously consider the prospect of hiring truly neutral and unbiased moderators where money is a more powerful motivator to swallow the boiling anger some of you users can stir up in us.
I understand that you want the Summit to be neutral, but you're effectively barking up the wrong tree. You keep saying it isn't neutral, and you're absolutely right. We agree with you. You're just not hearing us when we say that it's not our intention to be neutral. The purpose of The Summit has changed. It has become something completely different.
There are alternatives to what we have here, as we've pointed out time and time again. Compared to ours, "Intergalactic Summit" channel is not moderated by live users, but by a reporting system instead built into your NEOCOM. That completely hands off approach is just about as close as you can get to the sort of neutrality you request. Even then you will be subject to the interpretations of those reading and answering the reports. More often than not, you'll simply be told to block the offending user. That's neutrality. That's indirect moderation. That's allowing personal attacks. It's everything you ask for, already made.
I hope this helps. |
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:44:00 -
[201] - Quote
Then perhaps one final question and this one's probably the bread and butter of the entire topic: am I going to be banned for being me?
Judging by the number of people claiming to know what it is I am and are doing, I would like to say you already know me.
However as I look in the mirror I find myself fulfilling a role I honestly think no one prior to me has fulfilled, especially when it comes to the realm of radical Matari.
You say you envision a melting pot, but how well does a melting pot accommodate a girl who really doesn't know her place and refuses to settle? Who dares to even look the Cardinal in the eye and claim he's still a man and only that? Who dares to hold each capsuleer to a standard, even if it is a evil one? Who shines a warped silver light into what we find as taboo within society, not just the slave trade but the pleasure field within it, and those who find their escape there? The Matari who represents the disunity, believes in the violence, doesn't fear death but doesn't seem to know life either, who prides herself in the barbaric nature that many Amarrians would "rightfully" claim of her race?
A bold little vagabond amongst the stars, dabbling with the forbidden, shivering within the cold but finding home there, amongst the gnawing and mashing of metallic teeth... playing pirate because the immortal crowd sickens her but too many have invested within her to ever truly give up.
Is there room for her here?
Or for the sake of the stars does the little black hole need to find somewhere else? |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2382
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 02:57:00 -
[202] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Then perhaps one final question and this one's probably the bread and butter of the entire topic: am I going to be banned for being me?
If you mean for this thread? No.
If you have more specific questions on things that you tend to do in The Summit, I'd be happy to answer them in private. I can say that so far, watching you in The Summit, you haven't done anything particularly over the top. You're strange by some standards, and you're a bit irritating by others, but you've stayed within the rules so to speak.
Quote: Judging by the number of people claiming to know what it is I am and are doing, I would like to say you already know me.
However as I look in the mirror I find myself fulfilling a role I honestly think no one prior to me has fulfilled, especially when it comes to the realm of radical Matari.
I don't pretend to know you, so I can't comment on that. Like I said, if you want to provide more specific examples of things you wonder would be moderated, you can ask me in private when we next see each other there.
Quote: You say you envision a melting pot, but how well does a melting pot accommodate a girl who really doesn't know her place and refuses to settle? Who dares to even look the Cardinal in the eye and claim he's still a man and only that? Who dares to hold each capsuleer to a standard, even if it is a evil one? Who shines a warped silver light into what we find as taboo within society, not just the slave trade but the pleasure field within it, and those who find their escape there? The Matari who represents the disunity, believes in the violence, doesn't fear death but doesn't seem to know life either, who prides herself in the barbaric nature that many Amarrians would "rightfully" claim of her race?
A bold little vagabond amongst the stars, dabbling with the forbidden, shivering within the cold but finding home there, amongst the gnawing and mashing of metallic teeth... playing pirate because the immortal crowd sickens her but too many have invested within her to ever truly give up.
Is there room for her here?
Or for the sake of the stars does the little black hole need to find somewhere else?
I can't answer many of those questions for you. We've never really gotten to know each other, or spoken much beyond passing chatter.
I can say though that you've already been all of that so far - and we haven't tried or intended to get rid of you. Where you decide you want to go is up to you, but so far we haven't found reason to make that choice for you.
Despite how angry you've made some of us, you're still welcome in The Summit. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1183
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:08:00 -
[203] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:Isis Dea wrote: I also find her ego getting in the way of judgement far more than it should. Provide specific examples my moderator actions that are the result of this, or is this more your opinion than fact?
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:10:00 -
[204] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote:Isis Dea wrote: I also find her ego getting in the way of judgement far more than it should. Provide specific examples my moderator actions that are the result of this, or is this more your opinion than fact?
As demonstrated within this thread, easily. Even Saber pointed out where you crossed a line.
Nonetheless, I would like to stay. And of course to be a thorn in people's side as usual.
|

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1183
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:18:00 -
[205] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote:Isis Dea wrote: I also find her ego getting in the way of judgement far more than it should. Provide specific examples my moderator actions that are the result of this, or is this more your opinion than fact? As demonstrated within this thread, easily. Even Saber pointed out where you crossed a line. Nonetheless, I would like to stay. And of course to be a thorn in people's side as usual.
This thread is not the Summit. I don't have to follow Summit rules on the IGS.
Provide an example from The Summit where my moderator actions were the result of a personal agenda and not due to violation of Summit policies. This is important as I am a moderator and pride myself on an essentially sterling record of rare and justified moderation in that channel.
Find just one example.
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:23:00 -
[206] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote: This thread is not the Summit. I don't have to follow Summit rules on the IGS.
Provide an example from The Summit where my moderator actions were the result of a personal agenda and not due to violation of Summit policies. This is important as I am a moderator and pride myself on an essentially sterling record of rare and justified moderation in that channel.
Find just one example.
Did I specifically say you demonstrated such traits within The Summit? No. I've been referring to you being you in general. While I hope that's something you continue to not show within your power as a moderator, even Saber pointed out you hinted use of your power for personal opinion here.
Common sense considered, I think its safe to assume its only a matter of time. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1183
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:38:00 -
[207] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote: This thread is not the Summit. I don't have to follow Summit rules on the IGS.
Provide an example from The Summit where my moderator actions were the result of a personal agenda and not due to violation of Summit policies. This is important as I am a moderator and pride myself on an essentially sterling record of rare and justified moderation in that channel.
Find just one example.
Did I specifically say you demonstrated such traits within The Summit? No. I've been referring to you being you in general. While I hope that's something you continue to not show within your power as a moderator, even Saber pointed out you hinted use of your power for personal opinion here. Common sense considered, I think its safe to assume it's only a matter of time.
So you admit you have no evidence of moderator actions by myself being unjustified, and are basing your horrible opinion of my moderation on possible future actions?
You stay classy.
|

Isis Dea
State Protectorate Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 04:08:00 -
[208] - Quote
Silas Vitalia wrote:Isis Dea wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote: This thread is not the Summit. I don't have to follow Summit rules on the IGS.
Provide an example from The Summit where my moderator actions were the result of a personal agenda and not due to violation of Summit policies. This is important as I am a moderator and pride myself on an essentially sterling record of rare and justified moderation in that channel.
Find just one example.
Did I specifically say you demonstrated such traits within The Summit? No. I've been referring to you being you in general. While I hope that's something you continue to not show within your power as a moderator, even Saber pointed out you hinted use of your power for personal opinion here. Common sense considered, I think its safe to assume it's only a matter of time. So you admit you have no evidence of moderator actions by myself being unjustified, and are basing your horrible opinion of my moderation on possible future actions? You stay classy.
Horrible to you. I've taken you for your implied word, Miss Vitalia. Someone would be stupid not to.
The fact you're this sore over this could easily be another example.
Instead of fighting to get me to say something for you, how about just simply and originally saying, "Thank you for your opinion, Isis. I don't agree with it but you're welcome to it."
I think that would you properly telling me and anyone else monitoring this topic that you really don't let your personal opinion get in the way.
That would be a neutral response.
A moderator response. |

Silas Vitalia
Nobilita Nera JIHADASQUAD
1184
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 04:18:00 -
[209] - Quote
Isis Dea wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote:Isis Dea wrote:Silas Vitalia wrote: This thread is not the Summit. I don't have to follow Summit rules on the IGS.
Provide an example from The Summit where my moderator actions were the result of a personal agenda and not due to violation of Summit policies. This is important as I am a moderator and pride myself on an essentially sterling record of rare and justified moderation in that channel.
Find just one example.
Did I specifically say you demonstrated such traits within The Summit? No. I've been referring to you being you in general. While I hope that's something you continue to not show within your power as a moderator, even Saber pointed out you hinted use of your power for personal opinion here. Common sense considered, I think its safe to assume it's only a matter of time. So you admit you have no evidence of moderator actions by myself being unjustified, and are basing your horrible opinion of my moderation on possible future actions? You stay classy. Horrible to you. I've taken you for your implied word, Miss Vitalia. Someone would be stupid not to. The fact you're this sore over this could easily be another example. Instead of fighting to get me to say something for you, how about just simply and originally saying, "Thank you for your opinion, Isis. I don't agree with it but you're welcome to it." I think that would you properly telling me and anyone else monitoring this topic that you really don't let your personal opinion get in the way. That would be a neutral response. A moderator response.
Actually I'm quite free to shower you with derision as much as I like outside of that one particular channel.
It's a thing called work ethic that one is able to put aside such emotions under different circumstances.
And this notion that often gets repeated that my responding to a few forum threads is somehow a great victory against me and a demonstration of my soreness is just a bit pathetic.
If only there was a way you could effect me in some other, tangible way?
|

Ava Starfire
Stormcrows
1263
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 04:30:00 -
[210] - Quote
Oh look.
The three moderators she has issues with are precisely the three who have called her out on being an idiot.
Wow.
I'm sure it's just a coincedence. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |